Hi everyone,
I looking for an answer to the following questions:
1) How many equal path cost static routes to the same destination
network can a cisco router support.
2) how Can traffic be load shared between two redundant links on 1 to 3
ratio using static routing (i.e. 1 packet on one
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Hussam Adili wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I looking for an answer to the following questions:
> 1) How many equal path cost static routes to the same destination
> network can a cisco router support.
usually 4 by default, but expandable to 6 with the maximum-path
> 2) how Can traffic be load shared between two redundant links on 1 to 3
> ratio using static routing (i.e. 1 packet on one interface and 3
> packets on the other.)
I don't believe you can do this.not "balancing" like that. Do you
have something against running
Yes. I agree with Philip static route will not support load uneven balancing
but
EIGRP will. Static route will send out the packet in rotating basis and
ignore
the BW define.
Q 1. Up to 6 static routes can be supported by Cisco IOS.
Rgds,
Sam
> -Original Message-
> From: P
There is a yes answer to #2, but it probably requires 2 routers.
Basically, you need to have four paths between the routers either four
interfaces or vlan trunks, static routes on the "LAN" router, and policy
routes "internet" router.
Can it be done in one router? I&#x
The other downfall of using static routes to load balance is that you are
process switching the packets and not fast switching.
Here's Cisco's definations on the two...
Fast Switching
Cisco feature whereby a route cache is used to expedite packet switching
through a route
Does anyone have any ideas about implementing static ipx routes between
two different routers? Or better yet, static routes based on availability
of destination interface/address (ip or ipx)
Thanks,
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
Had a problem today that doesn't make much sense to me.
Very simplified layout (hopefully not oversimplified...)
RTA -- RTB -- RTC
RTB gets a summary LSA for a network, call it 50.0.0.0, from RTA. This summary
LSA is visible with the command 'show ip ospf da su'.
There is also a static route
Does the following lines extracted from a configuration redistribute all
static routes on the router? Or will I have to go through and add the
specific static routes and redistribute them? Trying to t-shoot an issue and
was wondering if redistribution of static routes (or lack thereof) was
Can anyone tell me if you are able to use a loopback address in a static
route. For example
ip route x.x.x.x y.y.y.y 196.8.87.17
x.x.x.x y.y.y.y being the loopback address.
Thanks
Mike
__
Disclaimer and confidentiality note
Everything in this e-ma
Hi
I know Im doing something completely stupid here so
please be kind.
Master and Oldie are linked via S0 (10.2.2.0/24).
192.168.1.0/24 is a network on e0
Im trying to use static routes as you can see. No
routing protocols are running.
>From Oldie, I can ping the Ethernet interf
Anybody heard about floating static routes at all?
Jose Luis Canillas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@groupstudy.com on
23/05/2000 01:31:50 PM
Please respond to Jose Luis Canillas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
S
Yes, they are basically static routes that you change the administrative
distance on, so that route is used only after a preferred route is no longer
available.
EF
-Original Message-
From: Jose Luis Canillas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 2:57 PM
To: cisco
Hi,
if there is a packet for the destination 10.2.2.6
and x.x.x.x is down.
Is the router permanently trying to send it via x.x.x.x (because of its
lower AD of 202) and drop it all the time ?!?
Or is it going to send it via y.y.y.y (ignoring the higer AD of 203) ?
S 10.0.0.0/8 [202/0] via
: Redistribution od Static Routes
Does the following lines extracted from a configuration redistribute all
static routes on the router? Or will I have to go through and add the
specific static routes and redistribute them? Trying to t-shoot an issue and
was wondering if redistribution of static
Let's say we have a given destination that has two static routes defined,
the first with an AD of 50, the second with an AD of 100. We are also using
EIGRP with an AD of 90. We just had a circuit go down which corresponded
with the first route, but instead of the eigrp route being inserted
In a message dated 11/6/00 1:12:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Had a problem today that doesn't make much sense to me.
Very simplified layout (hopefully not oversimplified...)
RTA -- RTB -- RTC
RTB gets a summary LSA for a network, call it 50.0.0.0, from RTA. This summ
- it shows up with 'show ip ospf da su'.
So there is an LSA for that network in the OSPF table on RTB.
My understanding, which you seem to confirm with your point 2, is that routing
protocols (in this case, OSPF and static routes) work independantly of one
another, and that barring redis
the OSPF route on RTB, RTB does know about
> the 50.0.0.0 network from OSPF as well - it shows up with 'show ip ospf da su'.
> So there is an LSA for that network in the OSPF table on RTB.
> My understanding, which you seem to confirm with your point 2, is that routing
> proto
- it shows up with 'show ip ospf da su'.
So there is an LSA for that network in the OSPF table on RTB.
My understanding, which you seem to confirm with your point 2, is that routing
protocols (in this case, OSPF and static routes) work independantly of one
another, and that barring redis
ith 'show ip ospf da
>su'.
>So there is an LSA for that network in the OSPF table on RTB.
>My understanding, which you seem to confirm with your point 2, is that routing
>protocols (in this case, OSPF and static routes) work independantly of one
>another, and that barring
OSPF table on RTB.
> My understanding, which you seem to confirm with your point 2, is that
routing
> protocols (in this case, OSPF and static routes) work independantly of one
> another, and that barring redistribution, OSPF will not have any knowledge
of
> the existence of the static route.
Jenny & "da group",
Like many of you I'm studying for the lab--big date(s) are
21/22 June. This one caught my eye so I attempted to duplicate it as
best I could...I set up the following lab:
RTR~D<--serial-->RTR~A<--Eth-->RTR~B<--Eth-->RTR~C
2500 2500 7507
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Watson, Rick, , OUSDC wrote:
> Does the following lines extracted from a configuration redistribute all
> static routes on the router? Or will I have to go through and add the
> specific static routes and redistribute them? Trying to t-shoot an issue and
> was
I'm really glad someone tested it! Your results mean that we aren't losing
our minds. Just one question, did you misspeak here:
"When I issued the same command while the
router was configured without the static it indicated it was being
learned via 10.1.1.1 and being redistributed into ospf."
Y
DA on 09/11/2000 11:08 am
---
Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/11/2000 06:08:58 am
Please respond to Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Frank B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA@NOTES
[EM
other router, then the loopback will be inaccessable if
that one interface on the other router goes down. If you're using static
routes, be sure to include all the different paths you can take to get to
the other router - which may be complex enough to warrant just going to RIP
or OSP
Yes, you can.
- Original Message -
From: Hawthorne, Mike MM
To:
Sent: Monday, 13 August, 2001 14:08
Subject: Static routes [7:15851]
> Can anyone tell me if you are able to use a loopback address in a static
> route. For example
> ip route x.x.x.x y.y.y.y 196.8.87.17
&g
Yes, you very well can. That is infact the way it is used when you need
to load-balance a BGP session with 2 T-1's with your ISP.:-)
>From: "Charles Manafa" >Reply-To: "Charles Manafa" >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Static routes [7:15851] >Date
D]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi
>
> I know Im doing something completely stupid here so
> please be kind.
>
> Master and Oldie are linked via S0 (10.2.2.0/24).
> 192.168.1.0/24 is a network on e0
> Im trying to use static routes as you can see. No
> routing
You can also either/or (to what router man suggested) remove the ip
default-network command, and it would work as well..
Nick
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29380&t=29372
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription in
The router will first make a longest match comparison and thus match the
10.2.2.4/30 route.
At 12:39 PM 7/24/2002 +, Antonio Montana wrote:
>Hi,
>
>if there is a packet for the destination 10.2.2.6
>and x.x.x.x is down.
>Is the router permanently trying to send it via x.x.x.x (because of its
If x.x.x.x is down the static route is no longer valid and is purged
unless you add the "permenant" keyword.
Dave
Antonio Montana wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> if there is a packet for the destination 10.2.2.6
> and x.x.x.x is down.
> Is the router permanently trying to send it via x.x.x.x (because of
MADMAN,
what if x.x.x.x is an ip address from a BRI0 interface that is up/up but
BRI0:1 and BRI0:2 are down ??
monti
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49524&t=49517
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: ht
It's up up but spoofing which doesn't count.
Dave
Antonio Montana wrote:
>
> MADMAN,
>
> what if x.x.x.x is an ip address from a BRI0 interface that is up/up but
> BRI0:1 and BRI0:2 are down ??
>
> monti
--
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL
I take that last email back!!! The static will be in your route table
and if interesting it will activate the channel(s)
Dave
Antonio Montana wrote:
>
> MADMAN,
>
> what if x.x.x.x is an ip address from a BRI0 interface that is up/up but
> BRI0:1 and BRI0:2 are down ??
>
> monti
--
David
yep,
it's in my routing table ...
so, than the longest match has precedence over administrative distance like
Peter van Oene replied, right ??
thanks a lot
monti
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49529&t=49517
-
That's actually not the fact. The router has no way of ever knowing
whether x.x.x.x is down. I think MADMAN means that if x.x.x.x's
corresponding route interface leaves up/up, only a 'permanent' route
will persist.
Jay greenberg
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 09:57, MADMAN wrote:
> If x.x.x.x is down
a common misunderstanding.
Administrative distance applies only to the process of placing routes into
the routing table. It has nothing to do with the actual forwarding process.
I.e. if identical OSPF, EIGRP, and static routes exist for the same
destination, administrative distance determines
Here is the command. I tried it on a 7407 but it didn't work as
advertised!!
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_r/iprprt2/1rdindep.htm#1018069
Dave
Jay Greenberg wrote:
>
> That's actually not the fact. The router has no way of ever knowing
> whether
Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought it was possible to add static routes on
a PIX firewall?...For instance, if your "outside" interface's IP was
198.6.1.4 and your "inside" Interface's IP was 172.16.0.1, couldn't you add
a static route to say for IP 172
If I have a static route to the outside world, how do I add that to OSPF? Do
I have to create static routes on my ABR to get outside?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38107&t=38107
--
FAQ, list archi
Hi All,
Can you guys indicate some reference that explains how static routes are
related with the network interfacing being up or down.
Is it mandatory (there is a recommendation or RFC) that a static route
disapears from the routing table when the NIC goes down (the interface cable
is removed
Dear All,
I have an OSPF query which has been causing me a headache,
I have two 2610 routers on the LAN
Router1 is joined to a large Frame relay network running OSPF.
Router2 is participating in the OSPF network but also has two ISDN links
to remote sites.
I have put in static routes to these
Is there a way to configure a metric to a static route?
One can configure the administrative distance.
I have a situation where i want to have 2 routes in the routing table , one
learned by eigrp and the other a static one
the problem is even if i configure the ad of the static with 90 , only
You may use the PIX and static routes to forward traffic across the PIX's
interfaces but
it will not do "one-armed" routing with secondary addresses like a router
will. A
description of the PIX route command can be found at
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix
cable to
traffic traversing the interfaces of the pix (i.e. coming from the outside
or dmz interfaces).
Steve
On Mon, 7 May 2001, John Gotti wrote:
> Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought it was possible to add static routes on
> a PIX firewall?...For instance, if your "outsid
> Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought it was possible to add static routes on
> a PIX firewall?...For instance, if your "outside" interface's IP was
> 198.6.1.4 and your "inside" Interface's IP was 172.16.0.1, couldn't you
add
> a static route to say
Yes, with a PIX you can configure static mappings of outside addresses to
inside addresses, and then configure "conduits" to allow particular
traffic types thru.
Brian
On Mon, 7 May 2001, John Gotti wrote:
> Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought it was possible to add static
But preferably access-lists instead of conduits ;)
- Original Message -
From: "Brian"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: PIX and static routes [7:3484]
> Yes, with a PIX you can configure static mappings of outside addresses to
> inside add
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If I have a static route to the outside world, how do I add that to OSPF?
Do
> I have to create static routes on my ABR to get outside?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38139&t=38107
-
In OSPF configuration mode on your ASBR, you can issue the command
"default-information originate". As long as the ASBR has a default route in
it's routing table, it will inject it into OSPF. Note that you cannot
redistribute a 0/0 route into OSPF. You don't have to cre
There's a test question if I ever heard one.
- Original Message -
From: "NetEng"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:06 AM
Subject: ospf and static routes [7:38107]
> If I have a static route to the outside world, how do I add that to OSPF?
Do
> I have to creat
redistribution will happen.
NetEng wrote:
>If I have a static route to the outside world, how do I add that to OSPF? Do
>I have to create static routes on my ABR to get outside?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=381
Please specify more detail info about your case
""NetEng"" If I have a static route to the outside world, how do I add
that to OSPF?
Do
> I have to create static routes on my ABR to get outside?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.
have a static route to the outside world, how do I add that to OSPF?
Do
> I have to create static routes on my ABR to get outside?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38108&t=38107
--
FAQ, list archives, a
I know that Static Routes have a higher priority than routes learned
dynamically. I've also learned that the exception to this rule is that
floating static routes can take a back seat to dynamic routes. (Please feel
free to beat me about the head if I'm wrong on this one. It will on
process!?
thanks again,
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 17:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OSPF and static routes [7:56030]
Did you add the redistribute static command to the OSPF process on
Router2?
That
obody@;groupstudy.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 17:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: OSPF and static routes [7:56030]
>
>
> Did you add the redistribute static command to the OSPF process
> on
> Router2?
> That should help. There could be other trickier is
Diego,
To configure an Administrative distance on a static route do the following.
ip route 10.4.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.1.20.1 100
The AD is set at 100 which is higher that the default of 90 for EIGRP.
This is called a floating static route and would be used in case of EIGRP
failing.
Brgds,
Steve
Sanchez
is right what you said
but one thing is the administrative distance and the other is the metric .
my concern is with the metric itself. as far as i know the metric can´t be
modified for a static route
regards - Diego
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=501
Are you talking about the static on the same router? What does that
accomplish?
If you were to redistribute the static into EIGRP, you can manipulate the
metric. It would take some work to tweak the calculations, but it is doable.
The static would then be advertised to the rest of the EIGRP domai
Static routes don't have a metric
(As Howard would say) What problem are you trying to solve?
About the only reason (I can think of) for 2 routes in the routing table is
to load balance across them. If you're not going to load balance (i.e. if
the static link is just for
Static routes do not have "metrics" as dynamic routes do. You are
correct in stating that the route with the lower administrative distance
is installed in the routing table. If your static has a lower distance
than the learned route the static will be used. If you have 2 routes
tha
yes chuck what you said is the only solution i implemented to this issue
it´s tweaky but possible . one must take in account not only the feasible
distance ( or metric ) of the distribution but also to set the
administrative distance to be 90 for this specific operation so the router
installs bo
really i need to have both routes for load balancing
the problem is that only one link runs a routing proto and the other not
i agree with you folks that the term metric of a static route is strange but
i have no other term to describe the situation
regards- Diego
Message Posted at:
http://www
Configure two static routes
Dave
Diego Rissone wrote:
>
> really i need to have both routes for load balancing
> the problem is that only one link runs a routing proto and the other not
>
> i agree with you folks that the term metric of a static route is strange
but
> i
I accidentally deleted the posting about this but I wanted to make a point.
It's been said that a static route has an AD of 1 unless it points directly
out an interface, in which case it has an AD of 0. Sasa just mentioned that
this has been discussed in the past and is a myth. However, I'd like to
When doing the CCIE LAB, one of the first statements is not to use any
static routes if they don't specifically ask for it. Now is a static route
only commands starting with "ip route .." or does this include commands
like:
"ip default-network"
"ip default
ng".
HTH,
John
>>> "Todd Carswell" 11/2/01 7:48:14 AM >>>
I know that Static Routes have a higher priority than routes learned
dynamically. I've also learned that the exception to this rule is
that
floating static routes can take a back seat to dynamic routes. (Pl
Look at the config. A floating static will have a metric higher than
that of the dynamic which makes it "float" or not injected into the
routing table unless the dynamically learned route is lost.
Dave
Todd Carswell wrote:
>
> I know that Static Routes have a higher prio
Carswell"
I know that Static Routes have a higher priority than routes learned
dynamically. I've also learned that the exception to this rule is that
floating
be seen in the routing table as a static route rather than
directly connected.
regards
Andy
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: Static Routes vs. Dynamic Routes [7:25059]
> Todd,
>
> A standard static route has an admin
> If I'm looking at the routing table in a router that I did not configure,
> how can I know that a static route is a floating static route and not just
a
> "run-o-the-mill" static route?
>
S network/masklength [AD/METRIC] how-connected, where AD is administrative
distance
by the administrative
John,
The behavior changed with the IOS releases. Newer IOS releases with
static routes pointing to an interface will have an administrative
distance of 1, not 0. Older versions will have an administrative
distance of 0. Unfortunately I do not know the exact release in which
the behavior
John Neiberger 7/17/03 12:12:42 PM >>>
>I accidentally deleted the posting about this but I wanted to make a
point.
>It's been said that a static route has an AD of 1 unless it points
directly
>out an interface, in which case it has an AD of 0. Sasa just mentioned
that
>this has been discussed
o test all
releases, a task that is probably impossible without a museum of hardware.
But I think the burden of proof has to lie with the pro-AD=0 faction given
the history on this issue.
Tom Martin wrote:
>
> John,
>
> The behavior changed with the IOS releases. Newer IOS releases
Hi Gang,
I have 2 routers separated by a 2Meg WAN Link.
Router A & Router B. Router B is my last configurable
router before some other poor gits responsibility.
Router B is running EIGRP with redistribute static
Router B contains a static route :
ip route 99.75.0.0 255.255.0.0 (Router B's Et
When configuring an ISDN backup for a frame relay circuit do most people
typically use "dialer watch" or "floating static routes". In my scenerio,
it's for an eigrp network and a single router.
I've seen the following article on Cisco's website:
http://w
long does it take for a directly connected route and static routes
assoicated with an interface to disappear from the routing tables?
Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9979&t=9979
--
FAQ, list archi
I have always used floating statics to back up a frame relay network.
Why?
Easy - we're only just migrating to IOS 12.1. And anyway, this particular
network has been using floating static routes for the last several years
(since *long* before dialer watch was available) - they are flexible,
though; I intend to kick the tires of
dialer watch a bit more myself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 6:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISDN dialer watch VS floating static ro
Thanks for the advice Benjamin and Jenny.
It sounds like you have to be careful when implementing dialer watch.
(Especially, if you only want to bring up the link for 'interesting
traffic'. I guess since 'dialer watch' is fairly new most people have
'floating static ro
Sure, you can do this. But why? Why not use per-destination load
balancing instead of paying for an unused link? To achieve your goal,
do exactly as you stated. Setting the AD higher on one of the static
routes will do what you want.
To answer the last question, if a directly connected
n message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Sure, you can do this. But why? Why not use per-destination load
> balancing instead of paying for an unused link? To achieve your goal,
> do exactly as you stated. Setting the AD higher on one of the static
> routes will do w
d
> balancing instead of paying for an unused link? To achieve your
goal,
> do exactly as you stated. Setting the AD higher on one of the
static
> routes will do what you want.
>
> To answer the last question, if a directly connected interface goes
> down then all routes that exit
home users on this network.
Here's the kicker. the client refuses to allow routing protocols on either
the home user routers ( Cisco 827's ) or the central site router ( Cisco
7206 ) That means how many static routes at the host site? :-0
Food for thought - what are some of the reasons th
Managment nightmare.
I think I see their point already Chuck. I don't quite see why CDP wouldn't
be allowed though.
Am I close ?
Tony M.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 PM
Subject: I have a customer who... food for
u might need to consider a radius server and map routes to the usernames
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I have a customer who... food for thought - static routes
[7:17819]
I have
Chuck,
I am currently working on straightening out a network with the same thing as
one of its major problems. Except they have in the neighborhood of 1300
static routes. The absurd part is that they are running OSPF but not using
it for routing.
Let me explain. They have many external
t: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: I have a customer who... food for thought - static routes
> [7:17819]
>
>
> I have a customer who... don't you love it when a post begins with those
> words?
>
> In my case, I am hoping this c
It's a network for 500 to 1000 engineers. Anyone ever hear the phrase, "too
many cooks"? Static routes would give far less ability for them to muck
about and screw up the network. If there's a network and an engineer,
there's a will to play...
> -Original
nt: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: I have a customer who... food for thought - static routes
[7:17895]
OOH! OOH! OOH!I KNOW!!!
The reason why said customer doesn't want routing protocols on either the
home user routers or the central site router is bec
st 30, 2001 12:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I have a customer who... food for thought - static routes
[7:17826]
I'll bite:
PROS:
1) If DSL user decides to change his network for some reason and it overlaps
another on somewhere, dynamic routing will hose the core. (could prevent
Let me throw in some thoughts.
Why are static routes not scalable?
People start muttering about "lots of configuration."
But doesn't your customer use some sort of database, or at least
spreadsheet, to keep track of which subnets have been assigned, both
to access links and
I just quickly glanced at the 827 docs on cisco.com, so please correct me if
I'm wrong about them. According to the docs, you can configure the 827's
for bridging or NAT. You could avoid static routes on this edge of the
customer's network entirely (except for defaults on the 82
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I have a customer who... food for thought - static routes
[7:18108]
I just quickly glanced at the 827 docs on cisco.com, so please correct me if
I'm wrong about them. According to the docs, you can configure the 827's
for bridging or NAT. You could avoid
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rob Fielding
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I have a customer who... food for thought - static routes
[7:18108]
I just quickly glanced at the 827 docs on cisco.com, so please correct me if
I'm wrong about them. According t
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 7:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: I have a customer who... food for thought - static routes
[7:18089]
Let me throw in some thoughts.
Why are static routes not scalable
day, August 31, 2001 5:07 PM
Subject: RE: I have a customer who... food for thought - static routes
[7:18108]
> yes - sheer numbers of devices in the shared bridging domain. we are
talking
> 500 to a thousand home users, many of whom are technically savvy folks who
> may have reasons good
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
