CHAP authentication does not use a TCP/UDP port. CHAP is handled in the PPP
protocol between the client and the router. The router may use some other
type of authentication (RADIUS, TACACS+, etc) to authenticate the user to
some outside security server, but the CHAP communications is carried
CHAP authentication does not use a TCP/UDP port. CHAP is handled in the PPP
protocol between the client and the router. The router may use some other
type of authentication (RADIUS, TACACS+, etc) to authenticate the user to
some outside security server, but the CHAP communications is carried
neg IP) and
that is where you want to put an incoming access-list on.
Martijn
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Thomas N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vrijdag 29 augustus 2003 11:31
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: TCP/UDP port for CHAP [7:74480]
I got SOHO sites with PPPoE
I got SOHO sites with PPPoE connection to the Internet. They use CHAP for
authentication. I would like to setup an ACL to filter out traffic on the
outside interface. I am wondering what TCP/UDP port CHAP protocol use?
Thanks!
Thomas
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form
A "window" is not a thing that gets sent in a TCP session. You don't send
"windows." A window is the size of the TCP receive buffer. A receiver can
send an ACK before its receive buffer is full. Perhaps you are thinking of
a "segment" in Cisco's term
On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 10:14 AM, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
>
>> 2.Can receiver send ack before whole window comes in?
>
> Not for the window it's receiving, but for a previous window.
>
Unless you're Microsoft.
http://grotto11.com/blog/slash.html?+1039831658
This isn't to make this a
"Reimer, Fred" wrote,
>A "window" is not a thing that gets sent in a TCP session. You don't send
>"windows."
A window is the amount of unacknowledged data the sender is allowed
to have outstanding to the receiver. It isn't necessarily identical
Here are some tcp questions:
1.Can the sender send more than the window size?
2.Can receiver send ack before whole window comes in?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73518&t=73518
--
**Please support Group
1.Can the sender send more than the window size?
No a sender can not send more than the window size
e.g if we have two hosts A and B and B's advertised window size is 32kb.
Upon the first tcp connection A(sender) can send up to the maximum window
sise(segments) and it then has to wait f
At 2:17 PM + 8/5/03, Janik James wrote:
>Here are some tcp questions:
>
>1.Can the sender send more than the window size?
No.
>2.Can receiver send ack before whole window comes in?
Not for the window it's receiving, but for a previous window.
Message Posted at:
http://w
D] A ---> FrameRelay(WAN) --> Location B ---> Site to
> Site VPN (T1)
> --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] C
>
> I have captured the packet using ethereal and found that Source
> PC TCP
> Maximum Segment Size is 1456bytes and that of Mainframe is
> 4056bytes. This
> slow response issu
A host uses the TCP maximum segment size option to specify the max size of
TCP segments (packets) that it can accept. In the case where you have the
slow response time, the mainframe is saying that its max segment size is
4056 bytes, which means that it can accept packets of that size (with that
Hello group,
I am facing slow response issue when connecting to Mainframe. This is how my
connectivity goes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] A ---> FrameRelay(WAN) --> Location B ---> Site to Site VPN (T1)
--> [EMAIL PROTECTED] C
I have captured the packet using ethereal and found that S
Hello,
I think this is 12.1.(5)T9 problem again.
Although you did not enable CBAC, but bear in mind:
"Cisco IOS IDS/CBAC and the TCP Intercept feature work independently of each
other and, in fact, should not be used together due to the fact that they
use the same internal engine.&
Hi,
Has anyone actually been playing with Cisco TCP intercept lately? Does this
piece of
crap work at all? I am running both IOS version 12.1.5(T9) and 12.2.15(T)
and TCP
intercept is not working in "intercept" mode. TCP intercept does work in
"watch" mode.
when it is r
>Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>>
>> Zsombor Papp wrote:
>> >
>> > As a side question, do you think that TCP must run over IP? :)
>>
>> I forgot to comment on that very important question! :-)
>>
>> I've never seen TCP run over a
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>Has anyone seen TCP run over anything other than IP? I'm curious.
IIRC, even Avian Carriers use IP
> By the way, TCP was developed before IP. Most people assume the
> opposite. At the time, TCP included most of IP's current
> functionali
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> Zsombor Papp wrote:
> >
> > As a side question, do you think that TCP must run over IP? :)
>
> I forgot to comment on that very important question! :-)
>
> I've never seen TCP run over anything other than IP, although
> in
Zsombor Papp wrote:
>
> As a side question, do you think that TCP must run over IP? :)
I forgot to comment on that very important question! :-)
I've never seen TCP run over anything other than IP, although in theory it
could. The devil in the details though.
Assuming no
Dear All, I am in the process of selecting a PIX model and would like to
know how many TCP sessions on average, and on peak that the router
receive ? Can this be accomplished using NetFlow ? If not, what other
options are available. Best Regards,Yasser
Larry Letterman wrote:
>
> Is it being load balanced or does it have 2 nics ?
> We just went thru this issue with a mail server and load
> balancing
> That had default gateway probs with two nics on separate
> subnets...
Default gateway problems caused it to send TCP resets? Wh
] On Behalf Of
Scott Hoover
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tcp reset problem [7:70521]
Running a solaris (v8 I think) box with Lotus Notes on it (new build).
We are having a problem with the server immediately sending a reset to
clients after receiving the syn
Scott Hoover wrote:
>
> Running a solaris (v8 I think) box with Lotus Notes on it (new
> build). We
> are having a problem with the server immediately sending a
> reset to clients
> after receiving the syn.
I bet there's a firewall on the server that's blocking access to the port.
> Congestion
Running a solaris (v8 I think) box with Lotus Notes on it (new build). We
are having a problem with the server immediately sending a reset to clients
after receiving the syn. Congestion or errors on the segment are
non-existent. I don't control the server so I can't see the logs but I'm
dealing
/www.webattack.com/get/superscan.shtml
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wilmes, Rusty
> > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 2:22 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: TCP/UDP port scanning Program [7:66881]
> >
> >
> > > -Original
CTED]
> Subject: RE: TCP/UDP port scanning Program [7:66881]
>
>
> the copy of this in my sent items has the link I sent but its not in what
> was recieved in the group. does majordomo scrub links?
>
>http://www.webattack.com/get/superscan.shtml
>
> > -
2 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: TCP/UDP port scanning Program [7:66881]
>
>
> I have been looking for any utilities that does TCP/UDP port scanning.
> If you know of any utility that can do the
IL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: TCP/UDP port scanning Program [7:66881]
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: johnman johnman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 12:42 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: TCP/UDP port scanning
ing for any utilities that does TCP/UDP port scanning.
> If you know of any utility that can do the port scanning please let me
know.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _
> MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viru
> -Original Message-
> From: johnman johnman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 12:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: TCP/UDP port scanning Program [7:66881]
>
>
> I have been looking for any utilities that does TCP/UDP port scanni
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TCP/UDP port scanning Program [7:66881]
I have been looking for any utilities that does TCP/UDP port scanning.
If you know of any utility that can do the port scanning please let me know.
_
I have been looking for any utilities that does TCP/UDP port scanning.
If you know of any utility that can do the port scanning please let me know.
_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http
Many thanx! Friend !
It seems that there is few errata in the book :))
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66741&t=8
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report mis
Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66689&t=66605
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
Subject: Errata of TCP/IP Volume I by Jeff [7:8]
Could Someone provide the Errata of TCP/IP Volume I by Jeff ? I have seen
it before in this BBS , but now I can not find it . Thanks!!!
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
Message Poste
Could Someone provide the Errata of TCP/IP Volume I by Jeff ? I have seen
it before in this BBS , but now I can not find it . Thanks!!!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8&t=8
--
FAQ, list archi
alaerte Vidali wrote:
>
> RFC 2001 explains TCP Slow Start, Congestion Avoidance,
> Fast Retransmit, and Fast Recovery Algorithms.
>
> I am trying to figure out a example when a duplicate ACK occurs
> due a segment that was lost.
If a recipient notices a hole in the bytes re
RFC 2001 explains TCP Slow Start, Congestion Avoidance,
Fast Retransmit, and Fast Recovery Algorithms.
I am trying to figure out a example when a duplicate ACK occurs
due a segment that was lost.
Any Thoughts?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66605&
S! ALL,
I have been to the Cisco Press site but I cannot find them there. It looks
like both books have been updated to newer editions. Does anyone have these
errata files? I have found that without these errata files the lab exercises
are near to useless due to the printing (and err..umm..just pl
ly don't have an
> answer. I've checked RFC 793 and haven't spotted the answer yet.
>
> Is there a default time specified in TCP to remain in the SYN SENT state?
> If a device sends a SYN and doesn't receive a response, is the timeout a
> built-in TCP parameter or
One of our programmers is asking me about this and I really don't have an
answer. I've checked RFC 793 and haven't spotted the answer yet.
Is there a default time specified in TCP to remain in the SYN SENT state?
If a device sends a SYN and doesn't receive a response, is th
ted
> the answer yet.
>
> Is there a default time specified in TCP to remain in the SYN
> SENT state? If a device sends a SYN and doesn't receive a
> response, is the timeout a built-in TCP parameter or is that a
> function of the application or operating system?
>
> I&
Are you talking about -
nmsp1790/tcpNarrative Media Streaming Protocol
nmsp1790/udpNarrative Media Streaming Protocol
I do not know the answer, but would suggest you permit it both ways then
do a show ip access-list to see what gets matched and then remove any
Hello,
Does tcp port 1790 have to be permitted both ways (similiar to bgp and
dlsw)?
Ex. #permit tcp any any eq 1790
#permit tcp any eq 1790 any
Could someone clarify this for me?
Thank you.
Sincerely,
CN
_
The new MSN 8
Hello,
Does tcp port 1790 have to be permitted both ways (similiar to bgp and
dlsw)?
Ex. #permit tcp any any eq 1790
#permit tcp any eq 1790 any
Could someone clarify this for me?
Thank you.
Sincerely,
CN
_
The new MSN 8
telnet service can sit on a port other than 23, in
a cisco router or switch for that matter.
i have not a found a way to do it(but, i haev not looked ver hard, either),
but it can be done by nating the tcp port of a giving ip, efectively
arriving at the desired solution.
u could use " ip
s:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > line vty 3 4
> > password LetMeInPort3001
> > login
> > rotary 1
> > !
> >
> > telnet 3001 allows you to telnet into router at port 3001
> >
> > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> >
> > >
.
""Dimitrije"" a icrit dans le message de news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> line vty 3 4
> password LetMeInPort3001
> login
> rotary 1
> !
>
> telnet 3001 allows you to telnet into router at port 3001
>
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
> &
This does not look right to me. I am about
to delve in to TCP/IP illustrated to find out about it, but does this
behaviour trigger anything in your minds?
Cheers,
Symon
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6461
e server from being an issue.
>
> IN the packet sniff I also see multiple acks with the same
> sequence
> number, one after the other. This does not look right to me. I
> am about
> to delve in to TCP/IP illustrated to find out about it, but
> does this
> behaviour trigger a
I found this link:
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2001.txt
Good explanation about slow start, congestion avoindance, fast retransmit
and fast recovery.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64513&t=63904
--
FAQ, list arch
line vty 3 4
password LetMeInPort3001
login
rotary 1
!
telnet 3001 allows you to telnet into router at port 3001
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> How do you change tcp port for telnet on a router?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+--- On Tuesday, March 04, 2003 14:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed:
|
| How do you change tcp port for telnet on a router?
|
supposing you wanted to telnet to the router using port 10023...
! ingress interface for telnet session
!
int e0
ip addr
How do you change tcp port for telnet on a router?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64382&t=64382
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report miscon
d in RFC 1144. The idea
behind it is to not send fields in the IP and TCP headers that aren't
changing or are easily predictable. It eliminates fields from both the TCP
and IP headers.
For some reason, finding a copy of the RFC that isn't in some awful format
and hasn't eliminated the fig
See this link for the answer.
http://www.elischer.org/netgraph/man/ng_vjc.8.html
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 22:16
To: Cisco Group Study; ccielab
Subject: Van Jacopson TCP/IP header compression (RFC 1144)
Hi group,
Does the Van Jacopson TCP/IP header compression
Hi group,
Does the Van Jacopson TCP/IP header compression algorithm compresses both ip
and tcp headers or only the tcp header?
Thanks in advance
John Tafasi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64045&t=64045
--
>Regarding ddditive increase and multiplicative decrease, I've never >heard
of any operating system doing that. After a quick Google, I >get the
impression those may be research projects? Can you tell us >more about them?
I was not successful trying to understand it.
I saw that there is a mechani
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am looking at TCP4s Flow Control mechanism. I have found
> Additive
> Increase/multiplicative decrease and slow start explanation.
>
> What I am looking for is how TCP/IP on our servers behavior
> when congestion
> occurs related with t
I am looking at TCP4s Flow Control mechanism. I have found Additive
Increase/multiplicative decrease and slow start explanation.
What I am looking for is how TCP/IP on our servers behavior when congestion
occurs related with the window size.
Any Thoughts?
Message Posted at:
http
Hi.. Can you teach me to do the following. I have a UNIX box (standalone
without IP) and it is connected to a RS232 printer. Now I want to convert
the RS232 signal to TCP/IP signal using the AS2509j access server and
transmit over WAN to another access server and convert back to RS232 and
ser) would be helpful.
Is it the tcp session which is dropping, an error message delivered from the
webserver due to an application timeout, ...
Best of Luck,
Darrell
Netswitch Technology Management
http://www.netswitch.net
""Jason Dimagiba"" wrote in message
[EMAIL
Jason Dimagiba wrote:
>
> Hello everyone, it's been a while since I last posted a message
> on this
> board >
>
> My question is:
>
> I currently experience a session timeout after 11 minutes
> running a
> query on IE5. I was thinking it may be the MTU size being set
> incorrectly on the rout
Dimagiba
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TCP connection drops after 11 minutes [7:62855]
Hello everyone, it's been a while since I last posted a message on this
board >
My question is:
I currently experience a session timeout after 11 minutes r
Hello everyone, it's been a while since I last posted a message on this
board >
My question is:
I currently experience a session timeout after 11 minutes running a
query on IE5. I was thinking it may be the MTU size being set
incorrectly on the router. I may be wrong but has anyone ever cam
Peter Golding wrote:
>
> sounds like the tcp mss parameter could be the cause. mss (max
> segment
> size) should negotiate end to end but some devices dont fall
> down to a
> lower mss requirement from the other end and therefore nothing
> is sent
> even when the tc
sounds like the tcp mss parameter could be the cause. mss (max segment
size) should negotiate end to end but some devices dont fall down to a
lower mss requirement from the other end and therefore nothing is sent
even when the tcp connection establishes.
regards, peter
Albert Lu wrote
Yes
"Peter P" @groupstudy.com em 31/01/2003 09:56:20
Favor responder a "Peter P"
Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Assunto:RE: NAT and TCP Load Distribution [7:62088]
Right. OK. Therefore - lets say we have 6 servers in our farm
Right. OK. Therefore - lets say we have 6 servers in our farm each issued
with RFC 1918 private address numbers. These get mapped to a singular global
inside address. When our customers start hitting the servers - they get
connected to one of the 6 servers in a round robin sequential fashion. This
I would use TCP. Although there are more header, all is up to TCP - link
failures, retransmission...
"Cisco Nuts" @groupstudy.com em 30/01/2003 08:58:17
Favor responder a "Cisco Nuts"
Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Assunto:
Hello,
If I have a bunch of routers connected via frame-relay and ospf & the
requirement is to configure DLSW peers between them, would I configure
remote-peers with tcp or frame-relay? (if the requirement did not
specifically state any).Thank you.Sincerel
sorry i didn't enphasis on a point that from i've written could be
misleading, (the router must rebuild the packet fields and frame fields,
then load balances to the servers.)
the router will actually, nat the ip, forward the packet in which case a
rewrite happens to the frame's mac.
regards,
""Ju
Web server farm for ur ebiz site,
u assign private address to the servers, and use only one public ip to
access them all.
""Peter P"" a icrit dans le message de news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks for that. Is my 'real world' example right in broad conception ?
Message Posted at:
http://www.grou
Thanks for that. Is my 'real world' example right in broad conception ?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62096&t=62088
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report mis
hi
it is nothing like HSRP, even if looked @ from the virtual IP point of view,
for the simple reason that HSRP elects one active router and only router is
active @ any time, (as opossed to TCP load Balacing, that uses all the ip's
of the servers to forward data to) and the real ip of the a
Can anyone give me a real world example of why you would need to consider
using TCP Load Distribution. I am summarising slightly but
TCP Load Distribution seems to be a method of using a single IP address (the
Global Inside Address)inbound; which is handed off to different devices on
the inside
trace? It would
be great for a training class. :-)
Priscilla
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 7:51 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Telnet S
education."
Priscilla
Oppenheimer To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MTU and TCP in PIX
[7:61441]
Sent
by:
no
Subject: Telnet SYN/ACK pkt reply on TCP source port 3-6!!??
I tried to telnet to a distant end 3660 router. Connection
would timeout. I was able to ping the router from my PC. The router
could telnet to the router that was between my PC and
itself. Ran captu
I tried to telnet to a distant end 3660 router. Connection would timeout. I
was able to ping the router from my PC. The router
could telnet to the router that was between my PC and itself. Ran capture
and the data yielded this
IP Source 10.0.0.1 Destination 10.0.1.2 TCP SYN destination port
02 ago
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * 192.168.12.195, from 192.168.12.195, 00:00:02 ago, via Ethernet0
> Route metric is 1, traffic share count is 1
> 10.33.75.1, from 10.33.75.1, 00:00:02 ago, via Ethernet0
> Route metric is 1, traffic share count is 1
>
> I
1, 00:00:02 ago, via Ethernet0
Route metric is 1, traffic share count is 1
I hope this answers your question. Take care.
Elmer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 5:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jeff's rout
BJ Rice wrote:
>
> Actually the PIX by default will allow fragmented packets.
That's not very nice of it. :-)
> This can be a vulnerability for the PIX. A good policy is to
> enable FragGuard on the PIX. This insures the PIX sees the
> entire seegmented packet before letting it pass through
Actually the PIX by default will allow fragmented packets. This can be a
vulnerability for the PIX. A good policy is to enable FragGuard on the
PIX. This insures the PIX sees the entire seegmented packet before letting
it pass through its outside interface.
Message Posted at:
http://www.group
on?
The return packets should be recognized, unless they are fragments too. But
there's no requirement that return packets be fragments. If they were
fragments, there would be an issue. Packets past the first one wouldn't have
any UDP or TCP header to help with the recognition.
When th
Since Priscilla has brought a very good point about fragmentation, I'll add
my 2 cents. Worked with pix before but not an expert. Say PIX does fragment,
would the return packet be recognized as a valid packet for a previously
established session?
Xueyan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.c
Albert Lu wrote:
>
> Hello Group,
>
> I've had this interesting thing happen with a PIX where tcp
> connection for
> HTTP was established through it however data does not pass
> through
> correctly, since there was no HTTP data being sent through. I
> noticed th
Because rip pass updates in different way.
Have a look on http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/105/54.html.
Hope it help.
If you are studing for ccie we can do together. I study now also the rip
from jeff's book.
Regards Petru
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61468
Hello Group,
I've had this interesting thing happen with a PIX where tcp connection for
HTTP was established through it however data does not pass through
correctly, since there was no HTTP data being sent through. I noticed that
the MTU for the outside and inside interfaces were differen
For Jeff's routing tcp/ip V1 book, page 214 and 215 . There is a secondly
ip address , for rip version 1 because of the discontinues 10.0.0.0. So why
there is only one route to 10.33.48.0 , and two route to 192.168.83.0 in the
routing table of Ernest_T ?
Message Posted at:
> "support" window scaling in that it still reflects the 16-bit
> value in the "normal" (non-handshake) data segments, you can
> track back to the original "syn, syn-ack, ack" handshake in the
> trace file and do the math yourself (assuming, of course, that
window scaling in that it still reflects the
16-bit value in the "normal" (non-handshake) data segments, you can track
back to the original "syn, syn-ack, ack" handshake in the trace file and do
the math yourself (assuming, of course, that the distant-end accepted the
offer to scal
To all,
There is a freeware program called Dr. TCP Win for Windows 2000/XP that
allows you to change both the MTU and TCP Window size--requires a reboot,
though, after the change.
Cheers!
--
Richard A. Deal
Visit my home page at http://home.cfl.rr.com/dealgroup/
Author of Cisco PIX Firewalls
> So one wild idea would be to remove memory from the host. Or maybe you
could
> get it to use up a chunk of memory by opening lots of large docs and/or
> using a RAM disk!?
In practice, you'd have to really restrict the amount of RAM to a level
that the OS wouldn't function. You're talking about
> An interesting side note: Ethereal apparently doesn't support window
> scaling.
Do you mean the tcp window scale option or just the phenomenon of having
data outstanding? You can always just count un-acked bytes for an idea
of how big the window is. It's dyanmic, of c
s vermill wrote:
>
> s vermill wrote:
> >
> > Group:
> >
> > On a W2k machine, I've tried several different recommendations
> > for adjusting the TCP receive window size. None of them,
> > including those directly from Microsoft, seem to have an
ltRcvWindow is a string type
> and
> > the
> > value describes the default receive windowsize for the TCP
> > stack.
> > Otherwise the windowsize has to be programmed in apps with
> > setsockopt."
> > Perhaps the app is setting it differently. It also see
s vermill wrote:
>
> Group:
>
> On a W2k machine, I've tried several different recommendations
> for adjusting the TCP receive window size. None of them,
> including those directly from Microsoft, seem to have any
> impact. I'm capturing my own traffic and my a
e 64kbps.
>
> Rik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: s vermill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 December 2002 6:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Perhaps O/T: Window TCP Rcv Window [7:59400]
>
> Marc Thach Xuan Ky wrote:
> >
> >
Marc Thach Xuan Ky wrote:
>
> Scott,
> A clue from this webpage:
> http://www.psc.edu/networking/perf_tune.html
> Describing Win98 it says "DefaultRcvWindow is a string type and
> the
> value describes the default receive windowsize for the TCP
> stack.
> Ot
1 - 100 of 652 matches
Mail list logo
