This is from Solie's book:
The name in Netbios lists is compared with the source name field for Netbios
commands 00 and 01 an is comparted with the destination name field for
Netbios commands 08, 0A and 0E (datagram, name-query, name recognized).
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form
Hi,
Have you considered something like this..??
dlsw icanreach netbios-exclusive
dlsw icanreach netbios-name "Name"
Also.. you will only see this in your local capabilities..
HTH,
Sal
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i
Hi,
I need a little information for a DSLW+ configuration. I have configured two
DLSW+ peers (router A and Router B), to connect two LANs (LAN A conneted to
router A and LAN B connected to router B). The transport is TCP/IP. I need
to configure a filter in router A which will permit pass to WAN
You should do bit-swapping because the routers will speak in non-canonical
addressing.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70164&t=70154
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.
There is a lot of confusion about running dlsw+ between two routers. For
example, If a there is a peer relationship between r1 and r2. r1 config,
dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 2.2.2.2 r2 config,
dlsw local-peer peer-id 2.2.2.2 dlsw remot-peer 0 tcp 1.1.1.1 both r1 and r2
Token Ring uses non-canonical addresses. There shouldn't be a need to swap
addresses if both hosts are on Ethernet.
Priscilla
Azhar Teza wrote:
>
> There is a lot of confusion about running dlsw+ between two
> routers. For example, If a there is a peer relationship between
&
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dlsw+ [7:64218]
where to locate dlsw, tb,irb in the document cd ? thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64229&t=64218
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription in
where to locate dlsw, tb,irb in the document cd ? thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64218&t=64218
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report miscon
Hello,To configure DLSW peers between 2 routers running FR, which cmd.
needs to be set under the interface:Is it:#frame-relay map dlsw 102
broadOR#frame-relay
map llc2 102 broad Which one?? I have got it to work by mapping to llc2
but just ran over Solie's PSV 1 where he talks about config
Hello,To configure DLSW peers between 2 routers running FR, which cmd.
needs to be set under the interface:Is it:#frame-relay map dlsw 102
broadOR#frame-relay
map llc2 102 broad Which one?? I have got it to work by mapping to llc2
but just ran over Solie's PSV 1 where he talks about config
Hello,Have 2 routers in a FR netw. configured for Dlsw using FR encap
with one side configured with just the promiscuous keyword only and the
frame-relay map llc2 cmd. The other side is configured with the
remote-peer and the frame-relay map llc2 cmd. Just to confirm: that this
does not work
Hello Paul,
Thank you very much for your reply.
If I have a FR p2p intf. and if I need to configure the Dlsw peers using
FR encap. is there a way to map llc2 to the dlci #?
This is only possible on a FR multipoint or physical intf. but not on a
p2p subif.
So if not, then is tcp and fst the
I would use TCP. Although there are more header, all is up to TCP - link
failures, retransmission...
"Cisco Nuts" @groupstudy.com em 30/01/2003 08:58:17
Favor responder a "Cisco Nuts"
Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Assunto:
Hello,
If I have a bunch of routers connected via frame-relay and ospf & the
requirement is to configure DLSW peers between them, would I configure
remote-peers with tcp or frame-relay? (if the requirement did not
specifically state any).Thank you.Sincerel
Hello,
I am trying to get Solie's Lab 32 static Nat and DLSW to
work and am unable to. I have tried variouse things including
adding the 100.100.1.1 loopback address and adding network statements
in EIGRP for it. Can anyone who has gotten this lab to work please
give me a cut and paste of
Hi Group,
I am very very confused about DLSW over ISDN. I tried to simulate the CCO
example
at:-
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk331/tk336/technologies_tech_note0
9186a0080093ecb.shtml
Firstly, by following the example exactly, I managed to get everything to
work.
However, according
initiate traffic by clicking on Network Neighborhood, I can see the
MAC
addresses showing up from the "show bridge" command & "show dlsw
reachability" & I
can also see the DLSW peers' states as "Connect". Yet the circuit keeps on
getting
to the "CKT_S
etBEUI 0xF0
SNA 0x04, 0x05, 0x08, 0x0C
IS-IS 0xFE
BPDU0x42
CDP 0xAA
Priscilla
Cisco Nuts wrote:
>
> Hello,If I were to permit only SNA traffic between 2 routers
> under DLSW+,
> what values would I use under the access-list?Ex. #access-list
> 299 permit
> 0x.. 0x...
The information you seek can be found on CCO at the following URL:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/698/acl200.html
HTH,
John
>>> "Cisco Nuts" 12/27/02 4:10:56 PM >>>
Hello,If I were to permit only SNA traffic between 2 routers under
DLSW+,
what values would I
Hello,If I were to permit only SNA traffic between 2 routers under DLSW+,
what values would I use under the access-list?Ex. #access-list 299 permit
0x.. 0x. I tried the Caslow and the Tan Nam-Kee books for further
clarification without much luck. Tried the DLSW+ config. guide on CCO -
No
Hi,
I have another task for you guys. I would appreciate your help.
I have R2 and ring 100 attached to it. On ring 100 there is a PC with mac
address , I do not want r3 and r4 send 'explorer' to find this
machine.
For this to work, I think I can use "dlsw icanreach mac-a
Hello group,
Does the dlsw prom-peer-default command override any capabilities exchanged
between a local peer set up as promiscouous and a peer trying to connec to
it?
Cheers,
Raul
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55326&
Ignore the subject.
I checked, on R1 I get full reachability to R3's ethernet network via R2. It
is just an interesting observation that no actual connection is active when
I enter 'sh dlsw peer' on R3 but in fact it is peering with the backup peer.
On R1 I see a Netbios name that
Hi
A DLSW backup peer question if anyone would care to clarify this:
|>>>>>>(BACKUP)>>R2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>|
R1 R3
|>>>>>>>(primary)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&
While loopbacks are good in a token ring environment, they are not good in
a Ethernet environment, especially if you are attempting DLSW Transparent
Redundancy.
Brett Johnson
-Original Message-
From: Debbie Westall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 9:12 AM
Adam,
I have used DLSW many times to connect SNA/token rings sites together.
It works great.
One piece of advice I can give when setting up the DLSW, use loopbacks to
form the DLSW "tunnel". This is especially useful if you have redundant
paths to the sites. The loopbacks are always u
Hi all,
I got a doubt on dlsw I could not find much info in CCO too.
How can we prevent the dlsw connection falling back to the primary peer from
the backup peer. The 'linger' option with '0' sec and the 'no linger' option
does not seems to be working out.
DLSW+ does establish a TCP connection between 2 routers by using defined
local and remote peers. The following global config commands are used :
dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.25.250.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 172.25.250.129
You also need to define a bridge group(SNA is not routable) for DLSW. The
Hi,
I am using DLSW over frame relay already. Works great. From what I can
remember, DLSW+ establishes a TCP connection between the 2 routers, leaving
the SNA on the LAN's
-Original Message-
From: Adam Frederick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2002 18:37
To: [
x27;s flowing across the
Frame.. but it's still SNA on my provider side. I'm curious as to how they
are going to accomplish this. They require we use a specific naming
convention on all our Win2K machines. I'm thinking they're going to use
DLSW+
? Any input is greatly appreciate
How can we prevent the dlsw connection falling back from backup peer to
primary peer when the later comes back alive. The 'linger' option with '0'
sec and the 'no linger' option does not seems to be solving the issue.
Any helpers please...
Message Posted at:
I have run into the udp problem but in a differant scenerio. If you
can get the 10 sites to work without adding the udp-disable to the main
router I would do so otherwise being a global command you will have to
touch them all.
Dave
Mohsin Hussain wrote:
>
> I have main DLSW
I have main DLSW router connecting to 20+ peers. 10 Of those peers connect
via firewall. Since DLSW uses UDP unicast port 0 to establish circuit,
firewall drops the dlsw session. To fix this Cisco came up with solution to
disable the UDP using DLSW udp-disable. My question is could I configure
Add Netbeui to your Windows clients on Ethernet. DLSW will bridge this and
you should see some traffic.
""Robert Massiache"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All
>
> I tried to perform DLSW in home lab, but with ether
Hi All
I tried to perform DLSW in home lab, but with ethernet interfaces.
Sh dlsw peers shows successfull 'connect' remoete peers.
But I cannot reachablity or, Netbios reachablity or mac address in
capablitues.
Can any none clarify it?
Thanks a
OBLEM/ISSUE:
--
i have the following config...r5 is the border peer & r8 & r4 are
clients...i configure a default cost of 5 on r5 but when i issue a "show
dlsw cap" on either client, the peer cost stays @ 3...is this a bug or
misconfig?
r5 (the border peer)
dlsw local-p
GoodMorning Sunshine!
Bill,
FST is supported only when the end systems reside on Token Ring. Two FST
peers can connect over High-Level Data Link Control (HDLC), Ethernet, Token
Ring, FDDI, Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM), or Frame Relay.
I believe FST can cross Ethernet but only for the purpos
Can FST encapsulation handle both Token Ring hosts and Ethernet hosts? In
the CCIE Practical Studies book there is a chart that sayd it only works
with Token Ring hosts, yet a couple of pages before that it states that it
will work with all types of Media?
Thanks for the help
Message Posted
i have the following config...r5 is the border peer & r8 & r4 are
clients...i configure a default cost of 5 on r5 but when i issue a "show
dlsw cap" on either client, the peer cost stays @ 3...is this a bug or
misconfig?
r5 (the border peer)
dlsw local-peer peer-id 100.100.5.
The source-bridge transparent command is only needed if
you are bridging between the token-ring and ethernet on
the same router. It is not needed if you are using
dlsw to peer between, for instance, R1 token and R2
ether AND R1 ether and R3 ether/token.
The virtual ring is not required on
his router!
Thirdly, to accomodate more than two rings on a router you need this virtual
ring. This is a limitation of the chips used in the routers.
Have a look at this link: (Watch the wrap)
I found this really useful - Solie book has some good srb and dlsw stuff too!
http://www.cisco.com/univercd
two questions...thx in advance!
1. is the "source-bridge transparent" command required on the token ring
router when one dlsw peer is ethernet only & the other dlsw peer is token
ring only (i.e., bet/ r1-e1 & r2-to1)?
2. why is the virtual ring (500) required on the ethe
GUys,
I am confused abt configuring Mobile ARPIf I want to make my users
mobile from Vlan 10 to VLan20. Where I shud conigure mobile ARP???on Vlan
10 or on Vlan 20??
2nd. do we have to define any network uner ROUTER MOBILE?? or just put it.
int e0(vlan20)
ip mobile arp
ip proxy arp
rout
hould specify the same list number in each definition. "
Chris
""William Lijewski"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have two questions about DLSW + that I could use some explainations for.
> I would greatly appreciate any feed
according to my understanding , it applies ring-list.
Rahul Mehta
""William Lijewski"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have two questions about DLSW + that I could use some explainations for.
> I would greatly appreciate any
I have two questions about DLSW + that I could use some explainations for.
I would greatly appreciate any feedback you may have.
1) When you are doing DLSW Lite across the Frame Relay why is it necessary
to map the LLC2 across the frame when you are not using passthrough? I can
undertand it
I have two questions about DLSW + that I could use some explainations for.
I would greatly appreciate any feedback you may have.
1) When you are doing DLSW Lite across the Frame Relay why is it necessary
to map the LLC2 across the frame when you are not using passthrough? I can
undertand it
With DLSW over frame relay, you can use direct encapsulation (frame map
dlsw, with pass thru), or DLSW Lite (frame map llc, no pass thru). On the
lab I'm sure they would make it clear which one they wanted and if not...
ask the proctor. Here's a link which explains it pretty well.
Hi,
I was as confused as you before, because different material
states different definition and categories about DLSw+ direct
encapsulation.
I am stick on the CD`s definition that DLSw+ Lite is one kind
of direct encapsulation over Frame Relay.
The following are my notes and conclusion
GUys,
A bit confuse abt DLSW+ direct encapsulation. I read on CD that
it can be configure via 2 ways
(1) DLSW LITe
(2) PASSTHRU
but I can see that in books dlsw lite is treated as another encapsulation
type and not the direct encapsulation..
SO If we follow the CD and lets consider that we
from RA to RB and RC using only one peer without
using DLSW border peer.
Isianto Istiadi
System Engineer
PT. Nusantara Compnet Integrator
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40889&t=40889
--
FAQ, list archives
Don't forget about RFC 2166
""Ben Lovegrove"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> For DLSw try RFC 1795
>
> HTH
> Ben
>
> Ben Lovegrove, CCNP
> Redspan Solutions Ltd
> Web: www.redspan.com & www.bensbookm
For DLSw try RFC 1795
HTH
Ben
Ben Lovegrove, CCNP
Redspan Solutions Ltd
Web: www.redspan.com & www.bensbookmarks.com
Tel: +44 (0)2392 492010
Fax: +44 (0)870 460 2156
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco hardware, software, accessories, and certification tips
>From: "Shivjit Patil
has a LOT of good info on this, though, so I'd read
through that stuff first, at least to familiarize yourself with it.
HTH,
John
>>> "Shivjit Patil" 4/2/02 11:29:18 PM >>>
Could anyone suggest a good resource for getting familiar with DLSW and
SRB.
Messag
Please reading this document carefully.
Techonology term , which is SNA , SRB , APPN , SDLC , DLSW+ , etc ,
is still important.
Legacy IBM SNA replace Cisco device historicaly and necessary ,
is more .
All of you , bad at English , sorry.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form
Could anyone suggest a good resource for getting familiar with DLSW and SRB.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40299&t=40299
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/ci
For DLSw+ I would look for Nam-Kee's Configuring Cisco Routers for Bridging,
DLSw+ and Desktop protocols. For switching - the Cisco LAN Switching by
Clark and Hamilton and Cisco Catalyst LAN switching by Rossi...
Either way, you should plum the depths of the CCO before buying any
Hi ALL,
any good books about Bridging and DLSW+ maybe with some Lab's to prepare
for the CCIE LAB exam.
Regards,
Tarry
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38984&t=38984
--
FAQ, list archives, and
Here's an example I pulled from the Groupstudy archives:
>netbios access-list host ccie deny TOKEN2
>netbios access-list host ccie permit *
>source-bridge ring-group 10
>dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.1
>dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.2 host-netbios-out ccie
>
This list
I must be missing something. Does anyone have an example of netbios name
filtering that works. I have spend countless hours on this and for some
reason i can seem to filter the names...
Thanks,
Dennis
r1:
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37475&t=37475
Please ignore the last post, I'm just being a dork again. :-)
I thought the usage of the dlsw port list command was like this:
dlsw port-list 1 s1
dlsw port-list 1 s2
That does not work and I end up with a one-entry port list. The actual
usage should be like this:
dlsw port-list 1
I have a problem that needs a temporary fix. At one of our branches we
have four attached SDLC devices and I need to use one dlsw peer for one
device and a different peer for the other three. At first I thought
this was easy and I'd use a port list. Well, it appears that the use of
the
tructor for CCIE R/S and Security 5-day class www.ccbootcamp.com
> __
> CCIE Security Training
> www.netcginc.com/training.htm
>
>
> ""ME"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > With dlsw, useing tcp encap, what tcp po
ost 150.20.12.2 host 150.20.12.1 eq 2065
access-list 101 permit tcp host 150.20.12.2 host 150.20.12.1 est
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq bgp
access-list 101 deny ip any any log
""Charles Manafa"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
DLSW uses port 2065 for read, and 2067 for write
CM
- Original Message -
From: "ME"
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 10:05 PM
Subject: DLSW access-list problem - more info [7:34985]
> I can see the the dlsw connection is useing tcp 2065, but seems to be
> anoth
2067
John Kaberna
CCIE #7146
NETCG Inc.
www.netcginc.com
(415) 750-3800
Instructor for CCIE R/S and Security 5-day class www.ccbootcamp.com
__
CCIE Security Training
www.netcginc.com/training.htm
""ME"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMA
I can see the the dlsw connection is useing tcp 2065, but seems to be
another piece missing... (dlsw peer works fine without acces-list).
Any help would be appreciated... I fly to SJ tomorow for the lab on
Monday...
Thanks!
R0-R1#sh access-list 101
Extended IP access list 101
permit udp
With dlsw, useing tcp encap, what tcp ports do I need open in an access-list
to allow dlsw to work? TCP 2065 by itself is not enough.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34981&t=34981
--
FAQ, list archi
Hello,
I'm working on getting a good understanding of DLSW+, but I'm having trouble
finding good information on this one subject: Using Priority with DLSW+.
I know the TCP ports 2065, 1981, 1982, 1983, and I know you can use them to
do queueing with, but I don't understand exa
If you're asking how to get DLSw+ traffic *through* a PIX, remember that
in later IOS releases DLSw+ will attempt to use UDP instead of TCP. If
your firewall is allowing TCP traffic into your network for DLSw+
connections, they will suddenly break if you upgrade to an IOS that uses
UDP.
Chris,
If your asking how your configure a PIX to allow DLSW to pass through it to
a router beyond the PIX, just configure a static nat and conduit/access-list
to allow the traffic the way you would any other inbound service. (DLSW uses
TCP port 2065)
If your asking how you configure DLSW _on_
Your not going to configure DLSW on a PIX, it's a security device, is
doesn't even support routing except static routes and minimal RIP.
Dave
chris fong wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any links on configuring DLSW on a
> PIX firewall with IOS 6.1 and running NAT? I tried
&g
Does anyone have any links on configuring DLSW on a
PIX firewall with IOS 6.1 and running NAT? I tried
Cisco's website and couldn't find any.
Thanks.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your uniq
The 0 is the "ring list number". From Cisco's website, is says "The dlsw
remote-peer command defines the IP address of the remote router. The number
0 that follows the remote-peer keyword is the ring-list number. Generally,
if you want a fully meshed network, use the num
When I try to define remote peer in a router, I need to specify the remote
peer IP address.
dlsw remote-peer tcp 0 tcp x.x.x.x
dlsw remote-peer tcp 0 tcp y.y.y.y
What does the "list-number" 0 mean? Do I need to put them into the same
list? What happens when I them into two diffe
Hi Joe
I don't know how this is done but will try to use the prom-peer-default
command and see what happens.
Faisal
""Joe"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Just wondering how to do point number 5 without using the keyword
&g
Just wondering how to do point number 5 without using the keyword
promiscuous? Do I use dlsw prom-peer-defaults?
""news"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hey guys
>
> I need help on understanding DLSW.
> I can not use the ke
Hey guys
I need help on understanding DLSW.
I can not use the keyword promiscuous any where in my config.
R3 and R2 is connected to Ring 100. R5 is connected to R3 and R2 via serial
link.
Task:
1. establish DLSW peer from R5 and R3 and R2
2. R5 should choose R2 as a better path to reach Ring
t need to enter the source-bridge command with the active keyword.
Well that clears that up, huh? Clear as mud
John
>>> "Michael Williams" 11/2/01 8:39:36 AM >>>
Me neither but it is a legitimate command.
Here's an URL with all kinds of information
Me neither but it is a legitimate command.
Here's an URL with all kinds of information about configuring and
troubleshooting DLSw
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/index.shtml
I do see that command used in a sample config on this page, so check this
one too (careful of wrap..
Done a lot of DLSW and never even heard of the command.
Dave
IT Guy wrote:
>
> Hi Buddies,
>
> I have confusion regarding command "Source bridge active",when configuring
> DLSW for Tokenring?
>
> Where we need to use this command??
> I beleive we have
Hi Buddies,
I have confusion regarding command "Source bridge active",when configuring
DLSW for Tokenring?
Where we need to use this command??
I beleive we have to use "Source bridge" Interface command when configuring
DLSW??Then whats the purpose of this another option &
YOU DA MAN!!!
I'm glad it's working for you now!
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24938&t=24930
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
Mike,
I GOT IT TO WORK
DLSW using frame in direct encapsulation,no ip addresses or routes in
sight!!!
Thanks for all your suggestions.
I didn't use the local dlci but did change the llc2 mappings to point to the
dlci closest to the frame switch for each spoke router.
So if rtr1 is spok
Mike,
Thanks for that.
I'll suppose this will only work as you say in a p2p setup.
I will try the local dlci command as suggested.
Appreciate you help here.
Regards
Richard
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24768&t=24475
---
Richard Botham wrote:
I see what you mean about "direct encapsulation" now. I see how that would
be fine if these are 2 ends on a point to point (many times when I setup
DLSW in the past, the two routers at the end of the tunnel were spread apart
across the WAN with many routers in b
Micheal,
Thanks for the reply.
I was looking at using the commands as follows for what Cisco call direct
encapsulation , rather than specifying ip addresses as the remote peer
destination
GLobal config
dlsw local-peer
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface s0/0
Interface commands
frame
As long as you can communication using IP between the two peer routers (i.e.
either both frame connections have an IP, are using unnumbered, or you setup
the DLSW tunnel using a loopback), your DLSW tunnel should work just fine.
Can you explain a bit more about your problem and perhaps post the
Hi All,
Has anyone managed to get dlsw working using frame relay
encapsulation.(Direct Encapsulation)
Are there any good examples anyone has that I could look at ?
Cheers
Richard
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24475&
It sees the MAC-address of the sender.
""Adam Carswell"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> I've been studying DLSw and here's what I've gathered so far...
>
> 1. DLSw terminates all RIFs at
Hi all,
I've been studying DLSw and here's what I've gathered so far...
1. DLSw terminates all RIFs at the local router
2. DLSw terminates the LLC2 connection at the local router
My question concerns the MAC address:
Will a receiving station see the local router's addres
n the
ethernet. The kicker, on the TR end I have the workstation and TR interface
into a 3920 switch. When I set up the switch with a TrBrf and TrCrf of my
own (where TrBrf=DLSW source Bridge # and TrCrf=ring#) I could not get the
dlsw circuits up.
All MACs and NetBIOS names showed up under show
You can disable DLSW on a router with the "dlsw disable" config command.
It's a handy
way to shut down DLSW without changing any configs.
Don't know question 2 off the top of me melon.
Dave
Jerry Seven wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on some scenarios
Hi,
I'm working on some scenarios, two questions I could not answer:
1) How to reset dlsw connections without altering the configuration of dlsw?
2) on dlsw router, only allow NetBIOS names that contains the letter CISCO
to be advertised to it's peer.
I know I could use netbios hos
I have done many DLSW configs including what used to be refered to as
translational bridging and had never had to worry about canonical,
non-canonical. Now ring numbers in hex vs. dec is another story...
Dave
Cisco Lover wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Having a very simple confusion ab
Hi guys,
Having a very simple confusion about when and where we need to convert
canonical/noncanonical addresses ,when dealing with DLSW+??
Like for eg, if the Question ask to use ICANREACH macaddress command on
tokenring router to show that this router can reach an ethernet
macaddress DO
try the token ring paper at ccprep.com
http://www.ccprep.com/resources/news/archives/Token_Ring2.pdf
its a good start
""Lupi, Guy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am trying to find a good resource on bridging and DLSW, does a
In a message dated 9/19/01 9:55:33 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Subj: Bridging and DLSW [7:20484]
Date: 9/19/01 9:55:33 PM Central Daylight Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lupi, Guy)
Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lupi, Gu
I am trying to find a good resource on bridging and DLSW, does anyone have
any specific links or books that they could recommend?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20484&t=20484
--
FAQ, list archi
How does QOS work when used on your WAN links, does it wait until the link
is degrading before executing and if so, how does it compute this?
For instance, I know that telnet and ftp are quite high from via sniffer.
Is it feasible to implement a QOS to conserve my bandwidth for my critical
appli
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
