I would like to see Cyrus imap moved from contrib to main.
Cheers!
S
As I found more and more hardware problems which are describe as software
(Mandrake) problems, it would be great to include a memory test and a hard
disk test in Mdk9.2 CD1.
The memory test is a stand alone OS it could be set up as rescue mode.
See http://www.memtest86.com/
When a computer has
On Monday 02 June 2003 15:00, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
As I found more and more hardware problems which are describe as
software (Mandrake) problems, it would be great to include a memory
test and a hard disk test in Mdk9.2 CD1.
The memory test is a stand alone OS it could be set up as rescue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre Jarillon wrote:
As I found more and more hardware problems which are describe as software
(Mandrake) problems, it would be great to include a memory test and a
hard
disk test in Mdk9.2 CD1.
The memory test is a stand alone OS it could be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Scherer wrote:
IIRC, memtest86 is a very long test.
It would be more intersting to propose a floppy image of it, and
instruction on how to test the system, in case of problem, in the
documentation.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9.1]$ ls
Le Lundi 2 Juin 2003 15:49, Buchan Milne a écrit :
As I found more and more hardware problems which are describe as software
(Mandrake) problems, it would be great to include a memory test and a
hard disk test in Mdk9.2 CD1.
See http://www.memtest86.com/
Michael said it is very
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:22:45PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
On Monday 02 June 2003 15:00, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
As I found more and more hardware problems which are describe as
software (Mandrake) problems, it would be great to include a memory
test and a hard disk test in Mdk9.2 CD1.
[SNIP]
But what disk test? Most disk tests are provided by the manufacturer,
some only work in DOS (except IBM DFT).
In case of defective tracks a warning should be given.
What about hdparm ? hdparm -Tt or is that not a real test ?
During a normal installation, it would be good
Le Lundi 2 Juin 2003 23:02, Thibaut Fernagut a écrit :
In case of defective tracks a warning should be given.
What about hdparm ? hdparm -Tt or is that not a real test ?
-Tt is only to test the speed. Not to search for defective tracks.
bonnie++ is far a more accurate measurement of the
Am Montag, 2. Juni 2003, 15:00:21 Uhr MET, schrieb Pierre Jarillon:
As I found more and more hardware problems which are describe as software
(Mandrake) problems, it would be great to include a memory test and a hard
disk test in Mdk9.2 CD1.
The memory test is a stand alone OS it could be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Buchan Milne wrote on Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 01:01:43PM +0200 :
The biggest issue is hardware, and the only way that is going to improve
is if more people test the Betas, since hardware/kernel fixes should not
be made in RCs. But, for this to
Entête en cours de reécriture, merci de patienter en lisant la réponse au mail
de Todd Lyons, à Mercredi 2 Avril 2003 21:18
Buchan Milne wrote on Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 01:01:43PM +0200 :
The biggest issue is hardware, and the only way that is going to improve
is if more people test the Betas,
Le mar 01/04/2003 à 00:14, J.A. Magallon a écrit :
1 - a laptop, except for the screen size and resolution witch is
sometimes particular(1400*1200) for example must run Mdk's normal i586.
It's not a different architecture.
I have realized this just as I type. Think of a lab/university admin that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Monday 31 March 2003 01:31 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
But the installer has to be reasonably finished before the rc phase
starts.
In my opinion, far too many features were being actively developed
during the
beta period: for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Elliott Martin wrote:
seeing the wishlist flyby got me thinking...
...it would be really cool if there were a drak tool for joystick
configuration...
anyway, it's just an idea!
Agreed, actually, draksound may be best to handle some of this,
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 14:34, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2003, James Sparenberg wrote:
I fail to see why a laptop needs vastly different software to a dekstop
machine.
Does Apple have a laptop version of OS X?
Yes
Please show me where I can buy it (and I don't mean
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 03:35, Steffen Barszus wrote:
On Monday 31 March 2003 02:41, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
Le Lundi 31 Mars 2003 01:27, Edward Tandi a écrit :
But I do personally think that the quality is beginning to suffer.
I think Mandrake should be releasing less frequently and
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 02:02, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Monday 31 March 2003 01:31 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
But the installer has to be reasonably finished before the rc phase
starts.
In my opinion, far too many features were
Elliott Martin wrote:
seeing the wishlist flyby got me thinking...
...it would be really cool if there were a drak tool for joystick
configuration...
anyway, it's just an idea!
-elliott
Long overdue! For USB joysticks it should be easy. The problem is with
gameport joysticks. I think
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, webudo2 wrote:
A bugfree released MDK 9.2 - with all bugs resolved known from cooker and
bugzilla
This also requires discipline from testers. Installer problems cannot be
worked on substantially after RCs. Kernel/hardware
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm. Haven't a DVD burner to try, but is anything more than k3b needed?
Free version of cdrecord can't write DVDs (AFAIK), and k3b does not know
about growisofs. You would also have to enter the size of the DVD in
minutes :-(. cdbakeover is no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Warly wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm. Haven't a DVD burner to try, but is anything more than k3b needed?
Free version of cdrecord can't write DVDs (AFAIK), and k3b does not know
about growisofs. You would also have to enter the
Le Mardi 1 Avril 2003 19:41, Warly a écrit :
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, webudo2 wrote:
A bugfree released MDK 9.2 - with all bugs resolved known from cooker
and bugzilla
This also requires discipline from testers. Installer problems cannot be
worked on
Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 29 March 2003 06:28, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
As it seems the correct moment:
- gpg-agent support
- mdadm support
- synaptic driver
- easy.urpmi better integration
- mirror mess sanitization
* One-click/one-command
Am Dienstag, 1. April 2003 18:08 schrieb George Mitchell:
Elliott Martin wrote:
seeing the wishlist flyby got me thinking...
...it would be really cool if there were a drak tool for joystick
configuration...
anyway, it's just an idea!
-elliott
Long overdue! For USB joysticks it
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 16:41, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
Le Lundi 31 Mars 2003 01:27, Edward Tandi a écrit :
But I do personally think that the quality is beginning to suffer. I
think Mandrake should be releasing less frequently and have a longer
stability/testing/fixing period. If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 16:41, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
perhaps the time has come to start looking at
a slower release cycle, and/or niche releases ie laptop, MNF Multimedia
etc.
I fail to see why a laptop needs vastly
Quoting Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
of If you want to ensure your hardware works, you *must* test beta1.
Buchan
Agree. I posted a similar message just after the final release. Maybe the more
efficient way is to :
- rename the beta to RC directly, or just use 1 beta. Psychologically, a
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 03:01, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 16:41, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
perhaps the time has come to start looking at
a slower release cycle, and/or niche releases ie laptop, MNF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- rename the beta to RC directly, or just use 1 beta. Psychologically,
a lot of
people try only the latest RC, thinking that bugs will be found by the
other
people...
Well, IMHO,
- fake that the final release date is actually 1 or 2 weeks before the real
release date, since most of the bugs arrive at the last minute, so that it
leaves more time to correct last minute bugs.
This would be lying, no ?
I don't think this is very honest...
But I agree that something
Quoting Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, IMHO, this is the mentality that *must* be fixed.
Quoting Michael Scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This would be lying, no ?
I don't think this is very honest...
OK, I know, this would be lying, this would be not very honest, etc... But I
don't
On Monday 31 March 2003 02:41, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
Le Lundi 31 Mars 2003 01:27, Edward Tandi a écrit :
But I do personally think that the quality is beginning to suffer.
I think Mandrake should be releasing less frequently and have a
longer stability/testing/fixing period. If
On Monday 31 March 2003 13:29, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- rename the beta to RC directly, or just use 1 beta. Psychologically,
a lot of
people try only the latest RC, thinking
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, IMHO, this is the mentality that *must* be fixed.
people usually are non patchable :-(
On Mon 31 Mar 2003 04:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted as excerpted below:
For the 9.0, I remember that there were so my bugs to correct the last
week, Mandrake decided to postpone the final by one week. Everyone agreed
and cheered Mandrake for a good decision. This would be exactly the same to
On Mon 31 Mar 2003 05:09, Steffen Barszus posted as excerpted below:
What about an alpha release from time to time ? My biggest problem is
-a to get the beta becaue of bandwidth
- to get the beta before the next beta is out ;)
Isn't this what Cooker is, essentially, at any moment, at least
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Buchan Milne wrote on Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 09:32:06PM +0200 :
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, webudo2 wrote:
A bugfree released MDK 9.2 - with all bugs resolved known from cooker and
bugzilla
This also requires discipline from testers. Installer
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 12:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
of If you want to ensure your hardware works, you *must* test beta1.
Buchan
Agree. I posted a similar message just after the final release. Maybe the more
efficient way is to :
...
-
On Monday 31 March 2003 00:36, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Sunday 30 March 2003 16:58, Michael Scherer wrote:
Since dosemu without a OS image is useless, they dropped it.
That's a false assumption if ever I've seen one. Nothing wrong with
installing your own copy of MS-DOS 6.22 under DOSEMU.
On 03.31, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 03:01, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 16:41, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
perhaps the time has come to start looking at
a slower release cycle,
On Mon, 30 Mar 2003, James Sparenberg wrote:
I fail to see why a laptop needs vastly different software to a dekstop
machine.
Does Apple have a laptop version of OS X?
Yes
Please show me where I can buy it (and I don't mean bundled, OEM is OEM,
Mandrake also does OEM, but this is not
But how easy is it to set up MS-DOS
depends on how hard you want it to be IF you have the floppies/ or a partition handy
On Monday 31 March 2003 01:31 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
Buchan Milne wrote on Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 09:32:06PM +0200 :
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, webudo2 wrote:
A bugfree released MDK 9.2 - with all bugs resolved known from cooker
and bugzilla
This also requires discipline from testers.
On Mon Mar 31 21:00 -0500, Greg Meyer wrote:
But the installer has to be reasonably finished before the rc phase starts.
In my opinion, far too many features were being actively developed during the
beta period: for example: mdkkdm, installer, mcc, galaxy and there are
others. All of
seeing the wishlist flyby got me thinking...
...it would be really cool if there were a drak tool for joystick
configuration...
anyway, it's just an idea!
-elliott
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 22:19, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 04:21, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Sunday 30 March 2003 04:31, Adam Williamson wrote:
Don't start crying gentoo!, because if you get speed boosts via
gentoo it's generally by using very aggressive compilation options,
Quoting Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sunday 30 March 2003 04:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whats wrong with dosemu?
Requires proprietary C compiler to build.
no it does not. it compiled in gcc.
Also, DosBox promises to be a little less savage on the CPU useage.
Cheers; Leon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 March 2003 05:04, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Sunday 30 March 2003 04:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whats wrong with dosemu?
Requires proprietary C compiler to build.
huh? no, that's incorrect, but it just won't compile under mandrake ATM,
Entête en cours de reécriture, merci de patienter en lisant la réponse au mail
de [EMAIL PROTECTED], à Dimanche 30 Mars 2003 11:09
Quoting Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sunday 30 March 2003 04:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whats wrong with dosemu?
Requires proprietary C compiler to
No, but I'd guess Mandrake has less aggressive compilation options for a
reason. Would the distro actually all build right with more aggressive
ones?
Well, just create the options, and, a lot of volontary beta tester will give
us report :-)
I think that mandrake use conservative compilation
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Leon Brooks wrote:
How? A likes-optimisation RPM spec tag?
LikesOptimised: CPU=i686 SSE
Anything that takes advantage of SSE should be packaged right (Gwenole's
multiple lib story).
* A working MS-DOS emulator.
Didn't dosbox go into contrib just after
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Michael Scherer wrote:
Well, just create the options, and, a lot of volontary beta tester will give
us report :-)
I don't think this is a good way to test ... some obscure software no-one
on cooker uses could have a fatal flaw triggered by optimisations.
I think that
On Sunday 30 March 2003 12:02, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
dosemu?
Requires proprietary C compiler to build.
huh? no, that's incorrect, but it just won't compile under mandrake ATM,
and the project does'nt really seem to be that active, no stable release
since 2001...
no it is only sligtly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 March 2003 10:58, Michael Scherer wrote:
Entête en cours de reécriture, merci de patienter en lisant la réponse au
mail de [EMAIL PROTECTED], à Dimanche 30 Mars 2003 11:09
Quoting Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sunday 30 March
On Sat 29 Mar 2003 20:23, Leon Brooks posted as excerpted below:
On Sunday 30 March 2003 09:00, Edward Tandi wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 17:46, webudo2 wrote:
A bugfree released MDK 9.2
Hooray! I'll vote for that. What about all those RPM requests in
Ma[n]drakeClub? We should have all
Le Samedi 29 Mars 2003 18:22, Francisco Alcaraz a écrit :
Well, so the message of Guillaume should be interpreted about de
development of draktools and others utilities to be created by the
Mandrakesoft team or incorporated to the system.
I didn't intend to be harsh in any manner, just to say
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
- gpg-agent support
- mdadm support
- synaptic driver
- easy.urpmi better integration
- mirror mess sanitization
- complete UI-review of all Mandrake tools including accessibility support
http://www.phatvibez.net/files/mandrake/draketools.html
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 13:03, Duncan wrote:
On Sat 29 Mar 2003 20:23, Leon Brooks posted as excerpted below:
On Sunday 30 March 2003 09:00, Edward Tandi wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 17:46, webudo2 wrote:
A bugfree released MDK 9.2
Hooray! I'll vote for that. What about all those RPM
- complete UI-review of all Mandrake tools including accessibility support
http://www.phatvibez.net/files/mandrake/draketools.html
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/
I know that Mandrake is doing usabilty test on their secretary ( and others
employees as well ).
What we need is way to
On Sunday 30 March 2003 19:31, Edward Tandi wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 13:03, Duncan wrote:
On Sat 29 Mar 2003 20:23, Leon Brooks posted as excerpted below:
On Sunday 30 March 2003 09:00, Edward Tandi wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 17:46, webudo2 wrote:
A bugfree released MDK 9.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 March 2003 20:25, Steffen Barszus wrote:
On Sunday 30 March 2003 19:31, Edward Tandi wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 13:03, Duncan wrote:
On Sat 29 Mar 2003 20:23, Leon Brooks posted as excerpted below:
On Sunday 30 March 2003
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Edward Tandi wrote:
But at the same time, It would have been good to get more of the
Club-requested apps into the release. Its all swings and roundabouts.
Well, a lot of the Club requests *did* make it, and *because* of Club.
Some were not feasible for club volunteers,
On Sunday 30 March 2003 16:58, Michael Scherer wrote:
Since dosemu without a OS image is useless, they dropped it.
That's a false assumption if ever I've seen one. Nothing wrong with installing
your own copy of MS-DOS 6.22 under DOSEMU.
Cheers; Leon
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 19:39, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 March 2003 20:25, Steffen Barszus wrote:
On Sunday 30 March 2003 19:31, Edward Tandi wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 13:03, Duncan wrote:
On Sat 29 Mar 2003 20:23, Leon
Le Lundi 31 Mars 2003 01:27, Edward Tandi a écrit :
But I do personally think that the quality is beginning to suffer. I
think Mandrake should be releasing less frequently and have a longer
stability/testing/fixing period. If you look at the reviews of Linux
distros, the highest
On Saturday 29 March 2003 06:28, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
As it seems the correct moment:
- gpg-agent support
- mdadm support
- synaptic driver
- easy.urpmi better integration
- mirror mess sanitization
* One-click/one-command rebuild-the-distro-optimized command. This should
have the
On Saturday 29 March 2003 06:28, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
As it seems the correct moment:
...oh, and support for usbnet as a network install medium, so you can plug a
machine with no LAN card into another Mandrake box with a USB host-to-host
cable (about AUD$100 retail, not a brainless A-to-A
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Leon Brooks wrote:
* One-click/one-command rebuild-the-distro-optimized command. This should
have the option of either rebuilding RPMs for everything it has an SRPM
to hand for, or rebuilding just the instaklled packages - and
consequently rebuild URPMI updates if
On Saturday 29 March 2003 13:28, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Leon Brooks wrote:
* Documentation on how to submit stuff like ISP details for the internet
Drake thingy.
First, it would be nice if drakconnect would allow you to configure a
dialup connection *after* a LAN
A Data base system for little data-base, until now the conection with MysQL,
postgresql and similar is powerfull and difficult; most of the people do need
a not as powerfull data-base server, but a very easy to use (create database,
add data, made easyli queries and so on).
Yes, the shadow of
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 11:57, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Saturday 29 March 2003 06:28, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
As it seems the correct moment:
- gpg-agent support
- mdadm support
- synaptic driver
- easy.urpmi better integration
- mirror mess sanitization
* One-click/one-command
Le Samedi 29 Mars 2003 14:22, Francisco Alcaraz a écrit :
A Data base system for little data-base, until now the conection with
MysQL, postgresql and similar is powerfull and difficult; most of the
people do need a not as powerfull data-base server, but a very easy to use
(create database, add
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 14:03:41 +0100
Steffen Barszus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 29 March 2003 13:28, Buchan Milne wrote:
Better support of dial up on more places, including:
- dialup for users
(where-should-i-click-to-connect-to-the-net-syndrom)
yea, I second that. It goes for
Guillaume, dont missunderstanding me;
I know, a easy to use database is not something to do by Mandrake team but to
incorporate if there exists some good solution.
You mean wish and this is a wish, isn't it?
El Sábado, 29 de Marzo de 2003 14:35, Guillaume Rousse escribió:
Le Samedi 29 Mars
lördagen den 29 mars 2003 14.03 skrev Steffen Barszus:
[snip]
- Better hardware database, maybe with user-contibuted entries
That would be easy during the final stage of the install if the user is
prompted with a question like Would you like to submit your hardware list to
our HW QA team
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Francisco Alcaraz wrote:
A Data base system for little data-base, until now the conection with MysQL,
postgresql and similar is powerfull and difficult; most of the people do need
a not as powerfull data-base server, but a very easy to use (create database,
add data,
* (Content is not really Mandrake's problem, but...) More complete and
better-integrated documentation for existing applications.
Well, what about localized documentation ?
There is some good website on Linux in french, and it would be a great idea
to have them as bookmark, or as
On Saturday 29 March 2003 14:31, rcc wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 14:03:41 +0100
Steffen Barszus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 29 March 2003 13:28, Buchan Milne wrote:
Better support of dial up on more places, including:
- dialup for users
Le Samedi 29 Mars 2003 14:55, Buchan Milne a écrit :
Have you tried a dbf file-based database with OO.o?
Yes, it works fine. OO.o uses odbc to access to a postgres database.
There is OOoverBD, a document in french with screenshots:
http://www.linux-france.org/prj/edu/archinet/OOo/
for example :
Le Samedi 29 Mars 2003 14:35, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
Yes, the shadow of access is over us, but we need something similar
(probably still not avaliable under linux, but OOo has a projetc about
this).
postgresql and pgaccess ?
postgresql is the best DBMS even better than Oracle. But
On Saturday 29 March 2003 12:57, Leon Brooks wrote:
* Falling-off-a-log-easy WINE, with useful help on getting Windows apps
to work under WINE (even if this is a link to an internet site, good
general help for getting things working should be available, both in
the form of a newbie
On 2003.03.29 06:57 Leon Brooks wrote:
* One-click/one-command rebuild-the-distro-optimized command. This should
have the option of either rebuilding RPMs for everything it has an SRPM
to hand for, or rebuilding just the instaklled packages - and
consequently rebuild URPMI updates if need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 29 March 2003 17:51, Austin wrote:
On 2003.03.29 06:57 Leon Brooks wrote:
* One-click/one-command rebuild-the-distro-optimized command. This should
have the option of either rebuilding RPMs for everything it has an SRPM
to hand
Le Samedi 29 Mars 2003 17:25, Danny Tholen a écrit :
What about Xwine (is now in contribs)?, guess I could add a link to some
docs in that program.
Good idea !
Migration and compatibility tools could be a new directory in rpmdrake.
This is now a great family of products. This is also a good
Well, so the message of Guillaume should be interpreted about de development
of draktools and others utilities to be created by the Mandrakesoft team or
incorporated to the system.
Let me think It will be good for 9.2 to include
1) Documentation about specific taks: lisen to music on
A bugfree released MDK 9.2 - with all bugs resolved known from cooker and
bugzilla
Le sam 29/03/2003 à 18:46, webudo2 a écrit :
A bugfree released MDK 9.2 - with all bugs resolved known from cooker and
bugzilla
-- Great ! ;) --
Maybe it could be a good thing to integrate bugbuddy when core.* are
generated...
An option which could be activated in drakconf?
In 9.2, it could
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:31:36 +0100
Steffen Barszus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mserver as well as LineControl are in contrib :) (thanks to buchan).
And the author of gmasqdialer (mserver) told me he want to have a look
at LineControl
excellent, my thanks go to Buchan
I'm going to test these
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, webudo2 wrote:
A bugfree released MDK 9.2 - with all bugs resolved known from cooker and
bugzilla
This also requires discipline from testers. Installer problems cannot be
worked on substantially after RCs. Kernel/hardware issues must be
known/resolved during beta.
Quoting Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* One-click/one-command rebuild-the-distro-optimized command. This
should
have the option of either rebuilding RPMs for everything it has an
SRPM
to hand for, or rebuilding just the instaklled packages - and
consequently rebuild URPMI
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 20:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* One-click/one-command rebuild-the-distro-optimized command. This
should
have the option of either rebuilding RPMs for everything it has an
SRPM
to hand for, or rebuilding just the
For the vast majority of applications you'll see no real increase in speed
at all between compiling for i586 and compiling for athlon-xp.
Is that also the reason why the rpmrc file in 9.1 doesnt contain the
additional optimization options that were present in the 9.0 rpmrc? No real
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 21:19, Texstar wrote:
For the vast majority of applications you'll see no real increase in speed
at all between compiling for i586 and compiling for athlon-xp.
Is that also the reason why the rpmrc file in 9.1 doesnt contain the
additional optimization options
The problem is that optimising for your system sounds all l33t and cool
but really, it's not, it's a huge waste of time.
I fully agree, but this is what the client dreams of.
Even if the gain is not worth the work, if it allow Mandrake to gain some
market share, it may be interesting.
And
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Michael Scherer wrote:
I fully agree, but this is what the client dreams of.
Even if the gain is not worth the work, if it allow Mandrake to gain some
market share, it may be interesting.
But it is more important to have real features than marketing hype.
And you
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 17:46, webudo2 wrote:
A bugfree released MDK 9.2 - with all bugs resolved known from cooker and
bugzilla
Hooray! I'll vote for that. What about all those RPM requests in
MadrakeClub? We should have all of them too!
Ed-T.
On Saturday 29 March 2003 20:28, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Leon Brooks wrote:
* One-click/one-command rebuild-the-distro-optimized command. This should
have the option of either rebuilding RPMs for everything it has an SRPM
to hand for, or rebuilding just the instaklled
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 02:10, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Saturday 29 March 2003 20:28, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Leon Brooks wrote:
* One-click/one-command rebuild-the-distro-optimized command. This should
have the option of either rebuilding RPMs for everything it has an SRPM
On Sunday 30 March 2003 04:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whats wrong with dosemu?
Requires proprietary C compiler to build.
Also, DosBox promises to be a little less savage on the CPU useage.
Cheers; Leon
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
