Nvidia drivers POPCNT SSE 4.2

​Hi, Is anyone running an Nvidia card on a CPU that does not support POPCNT? I have been reading about Blue Screens of Death being experience by Windows users due to Nvidia drivers not supporting CPUs which do not have support for POPCNT. I am wondering if this issue will affect Linux

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 intoa2880x2560

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 03:01:53PM -0400, gene heskett wrote: [...] > Which is why I catalogue MBA's in the same box as all the lawyers Bill S. > said he would kill first. I don't think killing is a good idea. Still, I'd be happy if the nerd community had the brains to not flock towards those ba

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 intoa2880x2560

On 10/8/24 14:48, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 02:28:44PM -0400, gene heskett wrote: On 10/8/24 08:14, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:41:20PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: [...] Synaptic now finds nvidia-settings, but wants 72 other packages to be loaded

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 into a2880x2560

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 02:28:44PM -0400, gene heskett wrote: > On 10/8/24 08:14, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:41:20PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Synaptic now finds nvidia-settings, but wants 72 other packag

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 into a2880x2560

On 10/8/24 08:14, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:41:20PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: [...] Synaptic now finds nvidia-settings, but wants 72 other packages to be loaded, including gcc which I took as a health and safety warning. This is DKMS [1]: NVIDIA's kernel m

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 into a 2880x2560

On Tue, 8 Oct 2024, Stefan Monnier wrote: Hmm... maybe I'm wrong but this gives me the impression you were not using nvidia's proprietary drivers, which which case you don't/didn't need `nvidia-settings` because `xrandr` (and the various front-ends for it) should have wo

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 into a 2880x256

Sorry, just dicovered, it is not the full xorg.conf. This is the correct one, and below you can see, where the resolution can be forced. Using xorg.conf is nice, when you need special settings. Hope this helps (and sorry again, to attach a file, but I suppose, this makes it for the op easier).

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 into a 2880x2560

Instead of using nvidia-settings, you could also create a /etc/X11/xorg.conf and edit the settings you need. Yes, xorg.conf ois no more needed, as the driver itself checks the settings, but in some cases xorg.conf might help. I allow myself to attache mine here from the old days, it is for

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 into a 2880x2560

> I took the risk, clicked on "apply", watched the packages load but during > the installation got the message "Free nouveau kernel module conflicts with > non free nvidia module. Reboot". I saw several messages of the form: Hmm... maybe I'm wrong but this gi

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 into a 2880x2560

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:41:20PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: [...] > Synaptic now finds nvidia-settings, but wants 72 other packages to be > loaded, including gcc which I took as a health and safety warning. This is DKMS [1]: NVIDIA's kernel module isn't GPL compatible (but th

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 into a 2880x2560

On Mon, 7 Oct 2024, Xiyue Deng wrote: Roger Price writes: Is there some way of getting to this package? Looks like nvidia-settings comes from "contrib". Have you enabled the contrib repository in your apt settings? Something like below: | deb https://deb.debian.org/debian/ boo

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 into a 2880x2560

On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:52:51 +0200 (CEST) Roger Price wrote: > In Debian 11 I have two 2560x1440 displays side by side in portrait > mode. With the package nvidia-settings I created an xorg.conf which > set these two displays to work as a single 2880x2560 display, Very > nice. I wo

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 into a 2880x2560

On 2024-10-07 21:52, Roger Price wrote: In Debian 11 I have two 2560x1440 displays side by side in portrait mode. With the package nvidia-settings I created an xorg.conf which set these two displays to work as a single 2880x2560 display, Very nice. I would now like to do the same thing in

Re: Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 into a 2880x2560

Roger Price writes: > In Debian 11 I have two 2560x1440 displays side by side in portrait mode. > With > the package nvidia-settings I created an xorg.conf which set these two > displays > to work as a single 2880x2560 display, Very nice. I would now like to do the > sa

Debian 12: need nvidia-settings to join 2 2560x1440 into a 2880x2560

In Debian 11 I have two 2560x1440 displays side by side in portrait mode. With the package nvidia-settings I created an xorg.conf which set these two displays to work as a single 2880x2560 display, Very nice. I would now like to do the same thing in Debian 12, but with Debian 12 I cannot find

workaround for Nvidia vs hibernate

I have an EVGA Nvidia GTX 970, Nvidia driver 470, and three monitors. If I hibernate at night and resume in the morning, the GPU gets in a state where: temp<60C: fan speed is actually and reported 0 temp>60C: fan speed is actually 0, but is reported as crazy non-contiguous values Which m

Re: linux-image-6.10.6 fails to build in nvidia-tesla-470

On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:04:18 +0200 Christian Britz wrote: > Am 09.09.24 um 10:27 schrieb David: > > > `apt auto-remove' > > You generally might want apt --purge auto-remove > This also cleans up configuration files. Which is the same as "apt autopurge", which I suggested earlier in this thre

Re: linux-image-6.10.6 fails to build in nvidia-tesla-470

Am 09.09.24 um 10:27 schrieb David: > `apt auto-remove' You generally might want apt --purge auto-remove This also cleans up configuration files.

Re: linux-image-6.10.6 fails to build in nvidia-tesla-470

On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 11:04 +0300, Anssi Saari wrote: > Charles Curley writes: > > > apt purge linux-image-amd64 linux-headers-amd64 > > apt install linux-image-amd64 linux-headers-amd64 > > > > You may want an "apt autopurge" in between. > > That should do it although it's apt autoremove  `ap

Re: linux-image-6.10.6 fails to build in nvidia-tesla-470

On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 11:04 +0300, Anssi Saari wrote: > Charles Curley writes: > > > apt purge linux-image-amd64 linux-headers-amd64 > > apt install linux-image-amd64 linux-headers-amd64 > > > > You may want an "apt autopurge" in between. > > That should do it although it's apt autoremove  `ap

Re: linux-image-6.10.6 fails to build in nvidia-tesla-470

Charles Curley writes: > apt purge linux-image-amd64 linux-headers-amd64 > apt install linux-image-amd64 linux-headers-amd64 > > You may want an "apt autopurge" in between. That should do it although it's apt autoremove I believe but if not you can explicitly remove the backport kernel image and

Re: linux-image-6.10.6 fails to build in nvidia-tesla-470

On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 16:39:46 -0600 Rick Macdonald wrote: > Well, this is embarrassing. I found in the bash history that I ran > this: > > apt install -t bookworm-backports linux-image-amd64 > linux-headers-amd64 > > Sorry to sound so lame, but I do I remove the backport such that it > goes back

Re: linux-image-6.10.6 fails to build in nvidia-tesla-470

ning an up-to-date Bookworm desktop. I have an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 (192-bit) using the NVIDIA Driver Version 470.256.02, coming from the nvidia-tesla-470 packages. I've searched this list and the package pages and don't see any bugs reported. The 6.10.6 image fails to build: Errors we

Re: linux-image-6.10.6 fails to build in nvidia-tesla-470

Rick Macdonald writes: > I'm running an up-to-date Bookworm desktop. I have an NVIDIA GeForce > GTX 760 (192-bit) using the NVIDIA Driver Version 470.256.02, coming > from the nvidia-tesla-470 packages. I've searched this list and the > package pages and don't see

linux-image-6.10.6 fails to build in nvidia-tesla-470

I'm running an up-to-date Bookworm desktop. I have an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 (192-bit) using the NVIDIA Driver Version 470.256.02, coming from the nvidia-tesla-470 packages. I've searched this list and the package pages and don't see any bugs reported. The 6.10.6 image

NVIDIA driver 555.58 released and Wayland Explicit Sync

​Hi, Previously I explained how I have been using AMD Radeon GPUs for supporting VirtIO 3D GPU drivers in KVM, Steam games, and Wayland in KDE. All working very well. I have a few Nvidia GPUs I would like to use but at this time, I don't think Nvidia proprietary drivers support Wa

Re: nvidia package 340xx

On 23/08/2024 18:51, Hans wrote: 2. Enter the line for sid into your /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-free non-free-firmware [...] 5. Do NOT upgrade any other files! Do NOT aot upgrade or aptitude upgrade now although it will install many other pack

Re: nvidia package 340xx

.list > > > > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/[1] sid main contrib non-free > > non-free- firmware > > > > > > 3. apt update > > > > > > 4. apt install nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver firmware-misc-nonfree > > At this point many packages

Re: nvidia package 340xx

ree > non-free- firmware > > > 3. apt update > > > 4. apt install nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver firmware-misc-nonfree At this point many packages were installed, I didn't get a choice, I am not sure why. Then system failed to boot X, so I scrapped it all. > My notebook i

Re: nvidia package 340xx

> I should read my own posts. I have now installed Ubuntu 22 with Kernel > 5.4 and it is working with the above Nvidia card. But I have only kicked > the can down the road to April. I wonder if it will be possible to run > Debian 12 or 11 with a 5.4 kernel and nvidia-legacy-340xx-dri

Re: nvidia package 340xx

Richmond writes: > Hans writes: > >> Am Samstag, 20. Mai 2023, 19:15:18 CEST schrieb Richmond: >> >>> Hans writes: >> >> >>> >> >>> As far as I remember the problem in Nvidia does not support kernels >> >>> above 4

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

David writes: > Hi, for your information, this wiki page: > https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian > has some information related to your question, I sometimes wonder if the deb-multimedia repo counts as a Frankendebian making thingy since the wiki page is ambiguous in my opinion. I sometimes

strange behavior with Nvidia driver on Bookworm (12)

Since I installed a GTX 970 and the Nvidia driver on my Bookworm (12) system, I've noticed some odd behavior. I'll start with the most obnoxious. I'm open to any ideas. Well, not _any_ any. 1. Last night before I went to bed I suspended my computer at 2:24:55. The next log mes

usermod video,audio (was: Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970)

On 16/08/2024 06:15, George at Clug wrote: usermod -a -G video,audio [myusername] It should not be necessary. Udev and systemd-logind "uaccess" feature grants permissions to the current active user through ACLs.

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

.xx.xxx), this one should also run perfectly. The 535 needs some special funtions, not all NVidia graphic chips got them. Noted. I think I'll let this run a few days to see what shakes out. -- Remember, if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 at 15:46, George at Clug wrote: > On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote: > > FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. > > Is this what is called a "Frankendebian" ? Hi, for your information, this wiki page: https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian has

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Friday, 16-08-2024 at 03:30 Hans wrote: > > What Steam games do you have working under Nvidia? I have watched people on > > YouTube play some interesting and modern games using Nvidia + Linux and > > with ray-tracing, but they have to do a lot of customisation from what I &g

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Friday, 16-08-2024 at 03:57 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 00:48:20 +1000, George at Clug wrote: > > On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote: > > > FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. > > > > Is this what is called a "Frankendebian" ? > > No. Back

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

Le 15/08/2024 à 19:17, e...@gmx.us a écrit : [...] > Aug 15 12:57:24 cerberus lightdm[1085]: Error getting user list from > org.freedesktop.Accounts: > GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name > org.freedesktop.Accounts was not provided by any .service files [...] didier@hp-

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

> > You don't get security updates for backport kernels, so I'd strongly > oppose it if you're running an exposed server. But for a desktop system > in a normal kind of setup (behind a firewall, or on a private network) > it should be within reasonable expectations of security. Huh, this is an

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 00:48:20 +1000, George at Clug wrote: > On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote: > > FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. > > Is this what is called a "Frankendebian" ? No. Backports are reasonably safe. Installing one doesn't break all your dep

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

ome special funtions, not all NVidia graphic chips got them. I used both, and there was no performance difference between the two versions. However, the 470.xx version is looking a little bit stabler, but this I can not prove. Just a feeling. Hope this helps! Best Hans

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

> What Steam games do you have working under Nvidia? I have watched people on > YouTube play some interesting and modern games using Nvidia + Linux and > with ray-tracing, but they have to do a lot of customisation from what I > could tell. From my experience basic distribution inst

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

list from org.freedesktop.Accounts: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.freedesktop.Accounts was not provided by any .service files and it looks like that sequence occurs 8 times. At least there's this: sudo journalctl | grep -c '^Aug 15 12:57.*HDMI-2' 8 and this sudo dmesg | grep -i nvid

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

r is the DVI one the only one that works in the console? On 8/15/24 05:05, Hans wrote: Check., if it is NOT loaded and if nvidia kernel modules ARE loaded: lsmod | grep nouveau none lsmod | grep nvidia nvidia_drm 77824 0 drm_kms_helper212992 1 nvidia_drm nvidia_mode

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On 8/15/24 05:05, Hans wrote: Hi Ebon, I am running a NVidia GTX-960 iin Debianbookworm and it is working lie a charme. No problems with any of the apps, Greg mentioned. KDE, Steam games and everything elese is working great. FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

On Thursday, 15-08-2024 at 19:05 Hans wrote: > Hi Ebon, > > I am running a NVidia GTX-960 iin Debianbookworm and it is working lie a > charme. > > No problems with any of the apps, Greg mentioned. KDE, Steam games and > everything elese is > working great. What

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

Hi Ebon, I am running a NVidia GTX-960 iin Debianbookworm and it is working lie a charme. No problems with any of the apps, Greg mentioned. KDE, Steam games and everything elese is working great. FYI I am running a backport kernel, it is 6.9.7+bpo-amd64. If your card

Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970

Ebon, I have used GTX 970 and GTX 960 video cards for several years.  I have used them with Bookworm since Bookworm was released, using the Bookworm packaged Nvidia proprietary drivers. As long as the GTX 970 is not faulty, you should have an excellent experience with the GTX 970, ... unless

nvidia driver for GTX 970

Short version: Please help me install the Nvidia drivers for a GTX 970 on a Bookworm system. Is there a Q&D guide that doesn't assume I'm an idiot, or is it easy enough to explain? Long version: Yes, I'm the same guy who was considering the Nouveau driver a while back. I

Avoid APT::Default-Release (was: Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size)

On 04/08/2024 06:24, Van Snyder wrote: Then, to avoid sucking anything more from unstable, I added /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/my-default containing APT::Default-Release "stable"; It prevents installing security updates

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On Sat, 2024-08-03 at 23:49 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2024-08-01 12:12:31 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 15:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > Should I switch to the proprietary nvidia driver on these > > > machines? > > > >

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

is is not something one does often. However, the initrd.* file is still significantly larger (by 20 MB) than previously. And according to the documentation, the difference between MODULES=most (default) and MODULES=dep concerns the filesystem and harddrive drivers, while I was concerned by the

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-01 12:12:31 -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 15:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Should I switch to the proprietary nvidia driver on these machines? > > Without NVidia's graphics accelerator, using software rendering with > nouveau is painful

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 01/08/24 at 17:46, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 15:26 (UTC+0200): -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69879473 2024-07-19 02:11:58 initrd.img-6.7.12-amd64 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 112644015 2024-08-01 13:01:40 initrd.img-6.9

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 15:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. > > On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the > proprietary nvidia driver: libnvidia-legacy-390xx-* packages. > And the initrd siz

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

tps://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076561 No, bug 1076561 is fixed. FYI, without this fix, the initrd file was so big that the kernel package could not even be installed on this machine. Now, I can install it, but the initrd file is nevertheless much bigger. If I understand corre

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 17:18 (UTC+0200): > On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> the bug fix should trim initrd size considerably before >> too long. > What do you mean? After package containing bug fix is installed, newly generated initrds will be considerably sma

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

On 2024-08-01 10:23:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 15:26 (UTC+0200): > > > I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. > > > On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the > > proprietary nvid

Re: nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

Vincent Lefevre composed on 2024-08-01 15:26 (UTC+0200): > I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. > On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the > proprietary nvidia driver: libnvidia-legacy-390xx-* packages. > And the initrd size is reason

nvidia vs nouveau driver and initrd.* size

I have several Debian/unstable machines, all with a Nvidia card. On one of them, due to a bug in nouveau in the past, I use the proprietary nvidia driver: libnvidia-legacy-390xx-* packages. And the initrd size is reasonable: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 66937544 2024-07-30 11:27:32 initrd.img-6.9.12

Re: Nvidia chipsets and Debian 12 [WAS Re: Why is Firefox crashing so much lately?]

th my old Dell Vostro 1700 because the NVidia graphics chip is soldered to the motherboard, and it needs the 340 driver, which is also no longer available. One chipset. If it *just* has Nvidia - at this point, use Nouveau - stop trying to use Nvidia drivers on old hardware and that Dell is

Re: Nvidia chipsets and Debian 12

Andrew M.A. Cater composed on 2024-07-18 17:51 (UTC): > So just use Nouveau already on a ~15 year old laptop. FTR, technically not a good recommendation. Nouveau has multiple meanings. Employing each individual meaning generally is suboptimal, as it includes the "reverse-engineered, experimental"

Nvidia chipsets and Debian 12 [WAS Re: Why is Firefox crashing so much lately?]

27;t do that with my old Dell Vostro 1700 because the NVidia > > > graphics chip is soldered to the motherboard, and it needs the 340 > > > driver, which is also no longer available. > > > > One chipset. > > > If it *just* has Nvidia - at this point, use Nouve

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

follow the instructions precisely correctly. I had been unable to install the NVidia drivers available as nvidia- driver. After doing the steps outlined at https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#Debian_12_.22Bookworm.22,  the response was "you have held broken packages." None of the

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

This should not have been happened. Maybe you dis something in a wrong way? I treid myself and it did not deinstall kde. It is important, not to do any upgrade while the entry for sid is in sources.list. Just install both packages (as told in the wiki), then after this install remove the si

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

allow to install the driver. But it removed > at least KDE, and now it won't enter run level 5. I added > nouveau.modeset=0 to the "linux" line in grub.cfg, but it's still > running the nouveau driver, or at least that's what inxi -G reports: > Hi, For the

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

level 5. I added nouveau.modeset=0 to the "linux" line in grub.cfg, but it's still running the nouveau driver, or at least that's what inxi -G reports: # inxi -G Graphics: Device-1: NVIDIA G86M [GeForce 8400M GS] driver: N/A Device-2: OmniVision OV2640 Webcam driver: uvcvideo type: U

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

] sid main contrib non-free non-free-firmware then do apt update apt install nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver firmware-misc-nonfree This should install all necessary files and build the kernel module. Here it did work. However, I had to use 390xx instead of 340xx, but both built here fine. After

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:29:43AM -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 08:03 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > Resolve never to buy Nvidia again :) > > 1) On my brother's antique Dell Vostro 1700 laptop, the NVidia G68M > (GeForce 8400M GS) is soldered to

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver firmware-misc-nonfree This should install all necessary files and build the kernel module. Here it did work. However, I had to use 390xx instead of 340xx, but both built here fine. After it, reboot and try again if it is working. Sometimes, nvidia-detect says, use

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 08:03 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Resolve never to buy Nvidia again :) 1) On my brother's antique Dell Vostro 1700 laptop, the NVidia G68M (GeForce 8400M GS) is soldered to the motherboard. 2)I'm running NVidia in two desktops because my erstwhile SA ga

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 02:16:20AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Van Snyder composed on 2024-06-07 13:29 (UTC-0700): > > > The messages I found said "Support for it ended in 2019. Use nouveau." > This is support from Nvidia, with official Nvidia proprietary drivers >

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

Van Snyder composed on 2024-06-07 13:29 (UTC-0700): > Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in > Debian 12? > The messages I found said "Support for it ended in 2019. Use nouveau." It should have said more. Some of what it should have included

Re: NVIDIA drivers issue: Bug that keeps presenting on kernel 6.1.0-21

to solve it? I wondered about this since I have no such issue. Then I remembered, you need nvidia-driver from bookworm-updates. $ uname -a Linux rocket 6.1.0-21-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.90-1 (2024-05-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux $ apt policy nvidia-driver nvidia-driver: Instal

NVIDIA drivers issue: Bug that keeps presenting on kernel 6.1.0-21

Hello team, by installing NVIDIA drivers as per the guideline of Debian on Debian 12, it shows an error as follows: Building initial module for 6.1.0-21-amd64 > readelf: Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start > readelf: Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

r posted. However, I > have a GF-119 in my Lenovo T520, where nvidia-detect says, it needs 340xx. > But, although I got 340xx compiled for the kernel, it did not start. > > I then build 390xx, which worked like a charm. This happened on my notebook > and also on an older graphics card i

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

> In real life no one wants to care of it! Nvidia not, because this > costs money and the developers not, because this is Nvidia and > proprietrary (what is not quite correct, because the kernel-module, > which is the part, that can not be build, is open-source). Since you sa

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

No, the NV6800M needs 340xx driver, not 390xx as I prior posted. However, I have a GF-119 in my Lenovo T520, where nvidia-detect says, it needs 340xx. But, although I got 340xx compiled for the kernel, it did not start. I then build 390xx, which worked like a charm. This happened on my notebook

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 01:13 +0200, Toni Mas Soler wrote: > El Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:56:23 -0700Van Snyder < > van.sny...@sbcglobal.net> va escriure el següent: > > On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 22:47 +0200, Hans wrote: > > > Just a hint: Sometimes the nvidia-config module says

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

El Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:56:23 -0700 Van Snyder va escriure el següent: > On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 22:47 +0200, Hans wrote: > > Just a hint: Sometimes the nvidia-config module says, you need > > 340.xx, but this is not always true. My card (with th eolder > > kernel) was runnin

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On 08/06/2024 03:29, Van Snyder wrote: Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in Debian 12? I am not aware of current state of affairs. Several years ago it was possible to rebuild the .deb package (that uses DKMS) with additional patches to make the code compatible

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 22:47 +0200, Hans wrote: > Just a hint: Sometimes the nvidia-config module says, you need 340.xx, but > this is not always true. My card (with th eolder kernel) was running 390.xx, > although th esystem told me, I have to use 340.xx. 390.xx was running like a >

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

Am Freitag, 7. Juni 2024, 22:29:30 CEST schrieb Van Snyder: Hi! Sadly to tell, that I treid hard to get 340.xx running in Bookworm. The problem is: You can not get it build with the actual kernel sources. I checked and the developers missed some dependencies, the NVidia driver needs at build

NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in Debian 12? The messages I found said "Support for it ended in 2019. Use nouveau." But I seem to have trouble with nouveau. When I was running Debian 10 on a Dell Vostro 1700 laptop with NVidia GeForce 8400M graphics,

Re: Dell Vosto 1700 and NVidia

was used also with a NVidia card GF8400M. Please note, that when you need to run with the proprietrary driver (which is downloadable as package from debian/oldstable, you need to run an old kernel. Otherwise the kernel module will not build. The 340xx legacy driver is the correct one for this

Re: Dell Vosto 1700 and NVidia

Am 20.05.2024 um 12:22:48 Uhr schrieb Van Snyder: > How do I switch to try nouveau instead? Completely uninstall it. Then reboot. If you have problem with nouveau, tell about them and maybe they can be fixed. -- kind regards Marco Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1716200568mu...@cartoonies.org

Re: Dell Vosto 1700 and NVidia

On Mon, 2024-05-20 at 20:42 +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > Am 20.05.2024 um 11:10:27 Uhr schrieb Van Snyder: > > > I installed the NVidia 340 driver > > Is there a special reason to use it instead of nouveau? I had had trouble with nouveau on other computers using different NVid

Re: Dell Vosto 1700 and NVidia

Am 20.05.2024 um 11:10:27 Uhr schrieb Van Snyder: > I installed the NVidia 340 driver Is there a special reason to use it instead of nouveau? -- Gruß Marco Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1716196227mu...@cartoonies.org

Dell Vosto 1700 and NVidia

I have an old Dell Vostro 1700 running Debian Trixie. It has an NVidia G86M (GeForce 8400M) graphics chip. I installed the NVidia 340 driver (which is difficult to find). I attached a HP 14" monitor to the VGA socket. When I booted, it came up with side-by-side displays. I could move wi

Re: how to downgrade nvidia-graphics-drivers packages?

inary packages from the nvidia-graphics-drivers, for example. > > Question is, how can I tell apt to avoid mixing version numbers? If they come from different repositories (i.e. backports, unstable, experimental) you can set priorities in /etc/apt/preferences.d/ -- read the man page for apt_

how to downgrade nvidia-graphics-drivers packages?

Hi folks, Looking at a set of installed binary packages built from the same source package, I would like to keep the version numbers consistent. There might be exceptions, but in general you won't like to mix unstable and experimental binary packages from the nvidia-graphics-drivers, for ex

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

ii at the beginning mean the package is installed. apt remove *nvidia* -s Check if the result is ok and then run it without -s (-s only simulates). Give it a try to nouveau driver, here it works very well with kernel 6.1.55 the only drawback I have is to restart the windows compositor when I

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

On 3/1/24 18:36, Thomas Anderson wrote: I will upgrade Debian to 12 within the next month or so...but before I do, want to clean up my current system. I am running Debian 12 with the nvidia driver. It's mostly OK but I recently had to reboot as the Xorg process had taken around 70%

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

lled. apt remove *nvidia* -s Check if the result is ok and then run it without -s (-s only simulates).

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

> dpkg-reconfigure nvidia-kernel-dkms > Hi all, I am using a NVidia card, which is using the Tesla-driver version (525.147.XX) and used the 470.XXX version before. Both could not be installed by using the above package. But it got installed using package module-assistant. Suggestio

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Marco Moock writes: > Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: > >> Here is the output. Wow, a lot. > > All those lines with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed. > > apt remove *nvidia* -s > > Check if the result is ok and then run it w

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: > Here is the output. Wow, a lot. All those lines with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed. apt remove *nvidia* -s Check if the result is ok and then run it without -s (-s only simulates).

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

+++-==--- un bumblebee-nvidia (no description available) ii glx-alternative-nvidia 1.0.0 amd64 allows the selection of NVIDIA as GLX provider un libegl-nvidia-legacy-390xx0 (no description available) un libegl

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Am 03.01.2024 um 11:36:03 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: > Key information: > I am aware that there are two different installation paths for the > nvidia driver, either through the repos or from nvidia downloads. > I think I did the later, but I have misplaced, lost, and cannot &g

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >