Re: Remove Gnome y dependencias

El 16/8/23 a las 14:21, Guido Ignacio escribió: Me mandaron un equipo para que deje solo MATE como desktop y veo que tiene instalado gnome y todo lo que instala el tasksel. Hay alguna forma de limpiar a gnome del sistema y las dependencias que instala? Obvio sin afectar a MATE Gracias

Re: unbound and fetchmail (was: Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system')

Am Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 10:09:42PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > On 02/03/2023 22:27, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > Am Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 09:26:33PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > > On 28/02/2023 17:25, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > > I will just inform about the status. Everything is fine

Re: unbound and fetchmail (was: Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system')

On 02/03/2023 22:27, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: Am Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 09:26:33PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: On 28/02/2023 17:25, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: I will just inform about the status. Everything is fine now. A word about systemd-networkd-wait-online: With this service running there

Re: unbound and fetchmail (was: Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system')

Am Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 09:26:33PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > On 28/02/2023 17:25, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > I will just inform about the status. Everything is fine now. A word > > about systemd-networkd-wait-online: With this service running there > > has been even a delay of 1-2 seconds

Re: unbound and fetchmail (was: Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system')

On 28/02/2023 17:25, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: I will just inform about the status. Everything is fine now. A word about systemd-networkd-wait-online: With this service running there has been even a delay of 1-2 seconds when switching from one console to a different one (the consoles when X is

Re: unbound and fetchmail (was: Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system')

Am Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 01:21:07PM -0600 schrieb David Wright: Hello David and Max, > On Sun 26 Feb 2023 at 19:08:01 (+0100), Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > Am Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 10:33:19PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > > On 25/02/2023 19:49, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > > Now there are

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Hi. On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:53:24PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > (Meanwhile solved with denyinterface in /etc/dhcpcd.conf) > > > > Long story short, consider running "systemctl mask dhcpcd" unless you > > need dhcpcd to work in a way described above. > > The laptop does need to

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Hi. On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 05:25:09PM +0300, Reco wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 04:01:06PM +0300, Reco wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 12:18:52PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: } } } } } Have you tried `journalctl

Re: unbound and fetchmail (was: Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system')

On Sun 26 Feb 2023 at 19:08:01 (+0100), Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > Am Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 10:33:19PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > On 25/02/2023 19:49, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > Now there are no messages reported by journald as above. > > > > I am curious if fixing unbound and so

Re: unbound and fetchmail (was: Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system')

Am Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 10:33:19PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > On 25/02/2023 19:49, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > Now there are no messages reported by journald as above. > > I am curious if fixing unbound and so network-online.target helped to avoid > 169.254.x.y address in your case. Can

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Sun 26 Feb 2023 at 22:11:30 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote: > On 26/02/2023 18:18, Geert Stappers wrote: > > AIUI is systemd-networkd the main player, dhcpcd some helper > > and NetworkManager for contact with user. > > First of all, I would not touch dhcpcd.conf for a while. > > Is it assumed

Re: unbound and fetchmail (was: Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system')

Am Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 10:33:19PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > On 25/02/2023 19:49, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > Now there are no messages reported by journald as above. > > I am curious if fixing unbound and so network-online.target helped to avoid > 169.254.x.y address in your case. I am

unbound and fetchmail (was: Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system')

On 25/02/2023 19:49, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: Now there are no messages reported by journald as above. I am curious if fixing unbound and so network-online.target helped to avoid 169.254.x.y address in your case. Can fetchmail work without a kludge you added to achieve some delay? My

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On 26/02/2023 18:18, Geert Stappers wrote: AIUI is systemd-networkd the main player, dhcpcd some helper and NetworkManager for contact with user. First of all, I would not touch dhcpcd.conf for a while. Is it assumed that ovs-system should get its IP address from DHCP? If I understand it

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Hi. On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > Hi. > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 04:01:06PM +0300, Reco wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 12:18:52PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > Feb 24 22:24:15 trancilo dhcpcd[1175]: ovs-system: carrier acquired > > > Feb 24

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Hi. On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 04:01:06PM +0300, Reco wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 12:18:52PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > Feb 24 22:24:15 trancilo dhcpcd[1175]: ovs-system: carrier acquired > > Feb 24 22:24:15 trancilo dhcpcd[1175]: ovs-system: IAID cb:93:09:25 > > Feb 24 22:24:15 trancilo

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Hi. On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 12:18:52PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > Feb 24 22:24:15 trancilo dhcpcd[1175]: ovs-system: carrier acquired > Feb 24 22:24:15 trancilo dhcpcd[1175]: ovs-system: IAID cb:93:09:25 > Feb 24 22:24:15 trancilo dhcpcd[1175]: ovs-system: adding address >

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 09:42:49AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 25/02/2023 04:43, Geert Stappers wrote: > > Having `apt purge avahi-autoipd` still gets me "auto IPv4 address" > > > > Ideas how to avoid it are welcome. > > Have you checked "journalctl --boot" for logs which component assigns >

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Am Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 07:41:26PM +0100 schrieb Christoph Brinkhaus: I reply to myself thanking Max. > Am Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:09:34PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > On 22/02/2023 23:45, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > Am Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:24:59PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > > > On

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 9:51 PM David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 24 Feb 2023 at 22:43:49 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote: > > [...] > I see you rebooted, and you get the same address. It's ambiguous as > to why: it could have been stored, which makes things more efficient > when a number of machines

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Fri 24 Feb 2023 at 22:43:49 (+0100), Geert Stappers wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 01:25:55PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 24 Feb 2023 at 19:41:26 (+0100), Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > Am Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:09:34PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > > > > > > > > > > I

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On 25/02/2023 04:43, Geert Stappers wrote: Having `apt purge avahi-autoipd` still gets me "auto IPv4 address" Ideas how to avoid it are welcome. Have you checked "journalctl --boot" for logs which component assigns 169.254.x.y address and for various errors related to network? I am not

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 01:25:55PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 24 Feb 2023 at 19:41:26 (+0100), Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > Am Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:09:34PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > > > > > I mean IPv4 link local addresses 169.254.x.y. My impression is that > > >

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Fri 24 Feb 2023 at 19:41:26 (+0100), Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > Am Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:09:34PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > On 22/02/2023 23:45, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > Am Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:24:59PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > > > On 22/02/2023 01:26, Christoph

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Am Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:09:34PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > On 22/02/2023 23:45, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > Am Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:24:59PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > > On 22/02/2023 01:26, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > > [Unit] > > > > Description=A remote mail retrieval and

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On 22/02/2023 23:45, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: Am Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:24:59PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: On 22/02/2023 01:26, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: [Unit] Description=A remote mail retrieval and forwarding utility After=network-online.target opensmtpd.service unbound.service

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On 22/02/2023 19:40, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 02:04:58PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Maybe the 'w' is not matching anything. I thought eth0 and wlan0 went the way of the dinosaurs. I thought with Consistent Network Device Names and biosdevname, the name will begin with a

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 02:04:58PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Maybe the 'w' is not matching anything. > > I thought eth0 and wlan0 went the way of the dinosaurs. I thought with > Consistent Network Device Names and biosdevname, the name will begin > with a 'p' or 'em', not a 'w', and based

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 1:43 PM David Wright wrote: > > On Tue 21 Feb 2023 at 13:48:58 (-0500), Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 1:26 PM Christoph Brinkhaus > > wrote: > > > [...] > > > > But backing up... I suspect there's something wrong with your static > > > > ip address

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 17:45:40 (+0100), Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > Am Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:24:59PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > On 22/02/2023 01:26, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > > > I have no idea if it is possible to estimate a DHCP response > > > > > time. > > > > Since static IP

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Tue 21 Feb 2023 at 13:48:58 (-0500), Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 1:26 PM Christoph Brinkhaus > wrote: > > [...] > > > But backing up... I suspect there's something wrong with your static > > > ip address assignment. The address is already taken, the netmask is > > > wrong,

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Am Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:24:59PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > On 22/02/2023 01:26, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > > I have no idea if it is possible to estimate a DHCP response > > > > time. > > Since static IP address is assigned, it does not matter. I expected DHCP > configuration and that

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On 22/02/2023 01:26, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: I have no idea if it is possible to estimate a DHCP response time. Since static IP address is assigned, it does not matter. I expected DHCP configuration and that delay may be noticed in `journalctl -b 0` logs. [Unit] Description=A remote

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 01:48:58PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 1:26 PM Christoph Brinkhaus > wrote: > > [...] > > > But backing up... I suspect there's something wrong with your static > > > ip address assignment. The address is already taken, the netmask is > > >

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 1:26 PM Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > [...] > > But backing up... I suspect there's something wrong with your static > > ip address assignment. The address is already taken, the netmask is > > wrong, or the gateway is wrong. > > > > Looking back through this thread, I did

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Am Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 01:06:01PM -0500 schrieb Jeffrey Walton: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:45 PM Christoph Brinkhaus > wrote: > > Am Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:00:56PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > > On 20/02/2023 21:44, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > > Am Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 09:59:20AM +0700

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Hi. On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 06:44:38PM +0100, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > I have no idea if it is possible to estimate a DHCP response time. sudo nmap --script broadcast-dhcp-discover Reco

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:45 PM Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > Am Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:00:56PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > > On 20/02/2023 21:44, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > > Am Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 09:59:20AM +0700 schrieb Max > > > > Perhaps to > > > get rid of 169.254.x.y addresses, it

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Am Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:00:56PM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: > On 20/02/2023 21:44, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > Am Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 09:59:20AM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: Hello Max, > > > Perhaps to get rid of 169.254.x.y addresses, it is enough to properly > > > configure network

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On 20/02/2023 21:44, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: Am Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 09:59:20AM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: Perhaps to get rid of 169.254.x.y addresses, it is enough to properly configure network interface, either to ensure that DHCP server is available or to assign a static address. After

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On 2023-02-19 at 11:21, Geert Stappers wrote: > Hi, > > Having installed package openvswitch-switch and doing `ip route` I do get > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system scope link src 169.254.201.7 metric 1004 > > > What can be done to prevent that "zeroconf" > configures interface `ovs-system`?

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 9:28 AM wrote: >[...] > -- > rhk > > (sig revised 20221206) > > If you reply: snip, snip, and snip again; leave attributions; avoid HTML; > avoid top posting; and keep it "on list". (Oxford comma (and semi-colon) > included at no charge.) If you revise the topic, change

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Am Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 09:59:20AM +0700 schrieb Max Nikulin: Hi Max, > On 19/02/2023 23:35, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > Am Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 05:21:47PM +0100 schrieb Geert Stappers: > > > Having installed package openvswitch-switch and doing `ip route` I do get > > >169.254.0.0/16 dev

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Monday, February 20, 2023 04:05:19 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 02:42:59AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 2:27 AM wrote: > [...] > > > > That's what Microsoft calls them. I prefer the RFC's IP4LL. > > > > And Wireshark

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 02:42:59AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 2:27 AM wrote: [...] > > That's what Microsoft calls them. I prefer the RFC's IP4LL. > > And Wireshark (https://wiki.wireshark.org/APIPA.md) and Cisco >

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 2:27 AM wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 12:53:25AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:22 AM Geert Stappers > > wrote: > > > > > > Having installed package openvswitch-switch and doing `ip route` I do get > > > > > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 12:53:25AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:22 AM Geert Stappers wrote: > > > > Having installed package openvswitch-switch and doing `ip route` I do get > > > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system scope link src 169.254.201.7 metric 1004 > > Those

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:22 AM Geert Stappers wrote: > > Having installed package openvswitch-switch and doing `ip route` I do get > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system scope link src 169.254.201.7 metric 1004 Those are called "APIPA's". Automatic Private IP Addressing (APIPA). The host parts

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On 20/02/2023 01:57, Geert Stappers wrote: feb 19 18:46:18 trancilo systemd-networkd-wait-online[601]: ovs-system: Failed to update link state, ignoring: No such file or directory feb 19 18:46:18 trancilo systemd-networkd-wait-online[601]: ovs-system: Failed to update link state, ignoring: No

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Mon 20 Feb 2023 at 09:59:20 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote: > On 19/02/2023 23:35, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > > Am Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 05:21:47PM +0100 schrieb Geert Stappers: > > > Having installed package openvswitch-switch and doing `ip route` I do get > > >169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On 19/02/2023 23:35, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: Am Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 05:21:47PM +0100 schrieb Geert Stappers: Having installed package openvswitch-switch and doing `ip route` I do get 169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system scope link src 169.254.201.7 metric 1004 Please have a look at

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Am Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 07:57:56PM +0100 schrieb Geert Stappers: Hi Geert, > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 12:21:36PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > >> Having installed package openvswitch-switch and doing `ip route` I do get > > >> 169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system scope link src 169.254.201.7 metric

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 12:21:36PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> Having installed package openvswitch-switch and doing `ip route` I do get > >> 169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system scope link src 169.254.201.7 metric 1004 > >> > >> What can be done to prevent that "zeroconf" > >> configures

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

>> Having installed package openvswitch-switch and doing `ip route` I do get >> 169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system scope link src 169.254.201.7 metric 1004 >> >> What can be done to prevent that "zeroconf" >> configures interface `ovs-system`? > > Please have a look at https://wiki.debian.org/Avahi.

Re: Remove route '169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system'

Am Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 05:21:47PM +0100 schrieb Geert Stappers: Hello Geert, > Having installed package openvswitch-switch and doing `ip route` I do get > 169.254.0.0/16 dev ovs-system scope link src 169.254.201.7 metric 1004 > > What can be done to prevent that "zeroconf" > configures

Re: Remove Network Manager panel icon in Mate 1.24.1 Desktop

On 25/10/2022 15:50, jeremy ardley wrote: My only problem now is the annoying NetworkManager icon in the Mate panel. I want to remove it and I have gone through various advice pages but nothing seems to work. The NetworkManager icon seems permanently wedged into the panel. Something like

Re: Remove package source from apt(-get)

On 23/5/22 9:54 am, Charles Curley wrote: On Mon, 23 May 2022 04:58:19 +0800 Bret Busby wrote: How then, do I deal with this (slightly different) problem involving MS keys? Did you try what I suggested above? Search on the problematic key? Whilst I had not interpreted what you had

Re: Remove package source from apt(-get)

On Mon, 23 May 2022 04:58:19 +0800 Bret Busby wrote: > How then, do I deal with this (slightly different) problem involving > MS keys? Did you try what I suggested above? Search on the problematic key? -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com

Re: Remove package source from apt(-get)

On 23/5/22 1:14 am, Charles Curley wrote: On Sun, 22 May 2022 11:49:42 -0400 The Wanderer wrote: The same happens with : "W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error:

Re: Remove package source from apt(-get)

On Sun, 22 May 2022 11:49:42 -0400 The Wanderer wrote: > > The same happens with : "W: An error occurred during the signature > > verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index > > files will be used. GPG error: > > https://packages.microsoft.com/repos/edge stable InRelease:

Re: Remove package source from apt(-get)

On 2022-05-22 at 11:42, Amn wrote: > When I 'ap-get update' I get this message: > > "*E: *The repository > 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/pipewire-debian/pipewire-upstream/ubuntu > kinetic Release' does not have a Release file" > > I checked " /etc/apt/sources.list ", but the above link is not

Re: Remove package source from apt(-get)

22.05.22, 17:42 +0200 Amn: When I 'ap-get update' I get this message: "*E: *The repository 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/pipewire-debian/pipewire-upstream/ubuntu kinetic Release' does not have a Release file" I checked " /etc/apt/sources.list ", but the above link is not there. Also check

Re: remove stop un

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Sunday, October 10th, 2021 at 2:49 PM, J B Martin wrote: > On 10/10/2021 3:46 PM, fxkl47BF wrote: > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On Sunday, October 10th, 2021 at 1:46 PM, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote: > > > > > On Sun 10 Oct 2021 at

Re: remove me from this list

Dear Bryant, If you have subscribed to this list in error (or somebody else has subscribed you as a prank or whatever) - You need to send a mail to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with the subject unsubscribe Note the -REQUEST part of the list address is crucial: the mailing list

Re: remove me from this list

On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:02:29 -0500 J B Martin wrote: > I do not use this product. > > Please remove my name. > > Thank you. You can remove yourself. Many mail lists add headers on how to manage the list to every email, as this list does. Get your mail reader to display headers (often CTL-h).

Re: Remove undesired entries in MATE "Applications" sub-menus

Richard Owlett wrote: > On 07/04/2020 07:38 AM, n...@dismail.de wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:53:56 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: >>> I'm using Debian10 with the MATE desktop. >>> The Debian installer defaults to installing a mess of applications I rarely >>> want. They end up with entries

Re: Remove undesired entries in MATE "Applications" sub-menus

On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 10:42:59PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 07/04/2020 07:38 AM, n...@dismail.de wrote: [...] > >MATE has graphical editor for this. If not already installed, the package > >is named "mozo" as is the tool itself. > > How would one discover that? I've silently been

Re: Remove undesired entries in MATE "Applications" sub-menus

On 07/05/2020 01:52 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Sb, 04 iul 20, 22:42:59, Richard Owlett wrote: On 07/04/2020 07:38 AM, n...@dismail.de wrote: On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:53:56 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm using Debian10 with the MATE desktop. The Debian installer defaults to installing a

Re: Remove undesired entries in MATE "Applications" sub-menus

On 4/7/20 11:10 pm, Peter Ehlert wrote: On 7/4/20 4:53 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm using Debian10 with the MATE desktop. The Debian installer defaults to installing a mess of applications I rarely want. They end up with entries on MATE's Applications sub-menus. Without deleting the

Re: Remove undesired entries in MATE "Applications" sub-menus

On Sb, 04 iul 20, 22:42:59, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 07/04/2020 07:38 AM, n...@dismail.de wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:53:56 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > I'm using Debian10 with the MATE desktop. > > > The Debian installer defaults to installing a mess of applications I > > >

Re: Remove undesired entries in MATE "Applications" sub-menus

On 07/04/2020 07:38 AM, n...@dismail.de wrote: On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:53:56 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm using Debian10 with the MATE desktop. The Debian installer defaults to installing a mess of applications I rarely want. They end up with entries on MATE's Applications sub-menus.

Re: Remove undesired entries in MATE "Applications" sub-menus

On 7/4/20 4:53 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm using Debian10 with the MATE desktop. The Debian installer defaults to installing a mess of applications I rarely want. They end up with entries on MATE's Applications sub-menus. Without deleting the offending applications from the system, how

Re: Remove undesired entries in MATE "Applications" sub-menus

On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 06:53:56 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm using Debian10 with the MATE desktop. > The Debian installer defaults to installing a mess of applications I rarely > want. They end up with entries on MATE's Applications sub-menus. > > Without deleting the offending

Re: Remove from all lists.

On Thu, 28 May 2020 08:09:18 -0600 David Anthony wrote: > Please remove me from all lists. Thanks. If you will examine the headers (CTL-h on most mail readers) of emails from a list, you will often find unsubscribe information. For this list, e.g.: List-Unsubscribe:

Re: Remove from all lists.

Please remove me from all lists. Thanks. On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:33 PM J B Martin wrote: > > -- > Joseph Bryant Martin > USA 804 223-0325 > Info Voice > 804 334-4309 > > -- *David Anthony* Church Service Missionary 33 Centerville Commons Way Centerville, UT 84014 Cell-801-360-4

Re: Remove package file from cache as soon as it is installed

André Rodier wrote: > Th partition is 20G, with the big files option, perhaps it was the > reason of the small number of inodes? Yes, of course. Why did you chose this option when mkfs'ing the filesystem? Besides: Those special options are more or less a thing of the past, where you really had

Re: Remove package file from cache as soon as it is installed

On Sun, 2019-09-22 at 11:08 -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Sun 22 Sep 2019 at 16:29:54 (+0100), André Rodier wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Is there a way, when using apt to install packages, to delete the > > package file from /var/cache as soon as it is installed? > > > > I am running a package

Re: Remove package file from cache as soon as it is installed

On Sun 22 Sep 2019 at 16:29:54 (+0100), André Rodier wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a way, when using apt to install packages, to delete the > package file from /var/cache as soon as it is installed? > > I am running a package installation inside docker:stable, and it fails > in the middle, with

Re: Remove package file from cache as soon as it is installed

Hi. On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 04:29:54PM +0100, André Rodier wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a way, when using apt to install packages, to delete the > package file from /var/cache as soon as it is installed? /usr/share/doc/apt/NEWS.Debian.gz: apt (1.2~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium

Re: Remove package file from cache as soon as it is installed

On Sun, 2019-09-22 at 18:01 +0200, Nemeth Gyorgy wrote: > 2019. 09. 22. 17:29 keltezéssel, André Rodier írta: > > Is there a way, when using apt to install packages, to delete the > > package file from /var/cache as soon as it is installed? > > apt-get clean > Thanks, I knew the command, so

Re: Remove package file from cache as soon as it is installed

2019. 09. 22. 17:29 keltezéssel, André Rodier írta: > Is there a way, when using apt to install packages, to delete the > package file from /var/cache as soon as it is installed? apt-get clean

Re: Remove nautilus to stop automounts? [Was: Re: pmount could perhaps be of greater utility?

On Tue 07 May 2019 at 21:34:14 +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 04.05.19 13:48, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Erik Christiansen (2019-05-04 08:43:53) > > > There doesn't seem to be an option for pmount to mount at > > > /media/label_read_from_the_media > ... > > I don't personally use

Re: Remove contents

On 22/08/17 07:44, Sherwin Kamperveen wrote: > Is it possible to remove the following contents. It is content that is very old. No. All information sent to these mailing lists is made public by the author. It is NOT possible to remove, and the Debian project will ignore any such request. See the

Re: Remove topic

On 03/30/2017 05:21 PM, Brad Rogers wrote: On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:42:58 -0400 Catherine Gramze wrote: Hello Catherine, The Debian mailing lists are publicly available. Perhaps the Debian IRC chat channels would give you the anonymity you want. I am sorry if this disclosure

Re: Remove topic

On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:42:58 -0400 Catherine Gramze wrote: Hello Catherine, >The Debian mailing lists are publicly available. Perhaps the Debian IRC >chat channels would give you the anonymity you want. I am sorry if this >disclosure of your name has harmed you in any way. You

Re: Remove topic

On 03/30/2017 04:16 PM, Lounis ILLOURMANE wrote: Hello, Can you please remove the topic on this URL https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/06/msg02062.html There's my first and family name, some people try to use this informations to hurt me. Please help me. Please do not make this message

Re: Remove topic

> On Mar 30, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Lounis ILLOURMANE wrote: > > Hello, > Can you please remove the topic on this URL > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/06/msg02062.html > There's my first and family name, some people try to use this informations to > hurt me. >

Re: Remove Account

On 2016-09-22, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: >> Brian wrote: >>> How are you reading these replies? >> >> By mails forwarded from the subscribed address to the unsubscribed one. >> I understand he cannot send mail from the subscribed address. > > > THEN... in a case like

Re: Remove Account

On 9/20/16, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > Benjamin R. Zakarin wrote: >> Therefore I implore of you to entirely scrub bzaka...@umich.edu from ALL >> MAILING LISTS AND ANY REGISTRY. > > I don't know whether anybody listens here who has the power to do so. > > Did you already try the

Re: Remove Account

On Sep 21, 2016 4:30 AM, "Michael Lange" wrote: > .-.. .. ...- . .-.. --- -. --. .- -. -.. .--. .-. --- ... .--. . .-. I'm so rusty with my Morse, it took me a minute and some effort to decode this. I always planned to get good at code. Maybe I will, if your alien

Re: Remove Account

On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:08:12 +0100 Lisi Reisz wrote: (...) > Sadly that doesn't help with the OP's problem. That requires access to > the subscribed email address. He no longer has access to the > subscribed email address and everything is being forwarded to him so he >

Re: Remove Account

On Wednesday 21 September 2016 08:29:09 Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:30:57PM +0100, Brian wrote: > > On Tue 20 Sep 2016 at 22:40:23 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > > Brian wrote: > > > > But you said he would read list mail as follows: > > > > > > He said he _receives_

Re: Remove Account

On 2016-09-21, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > It's a bot that handles requests to join the list. > > debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > > with a subject of > > subscribe > > for example and > > unsubscribe > > Note the capitalisation. > > AndyC > I learned

Re: Remove Account

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:30:57PM +0100, Brian wrote: > On Tue 20 Sep 2016 at 22:40:23 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > > Brian wrote: > > > But you said he would read list mail as follows: > > > > He said he _receives_ list mail. He did not say that he reads it. > > > > > Now he is mass

Re: Remove Account

On Tue 20 Sep 2016 at 22:40:23 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Brian wrote: > > But you said he would read list mail as follows: > > He said he _receives_ list mail. He did not say that he reads it. > > > Now he is mass deleting it! > > Potentially. An assumption as base for an in-advance

Re: Remove Account

Hi, Brian wrote: > But you said he would read list mail as follows: He said he _receives_ list mail. He did not say that he reads it. > Now he is mass deleting it! Potentially. An assumption as base for an in-advance workaround offer. He mentioned multiple debian lists. Nobody can read them

Re: Remove Account

On Tue 20 Sep 2016 at 21:22:02 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Brian wrote: > > But he can reply to either of our mails. > > Yeah. But i expect that the automat at debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org debian-user-request has nothing to do with it. He can reply to -user in the same way he sent

Re: Remove Account

Hi, i looked at the confirmation request from my subscription here, a year ago. The hope for a HTTP link dwindles. But there is the advise to send a mail To: debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org Subject: unsubscribe bzaka...@umich.edu If this does not help, then send your problem

Re: Remove Account

On Tue 20 Sep 2016 at 20:41:45 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Brian wrote: > > How are you reading these replies? > > By mails forwarded from the subscribed address to the unsubscribed one. That's a good point. If he is receiving all -user amils I needn't have sent a Cc:. Damn. > I understand

Re: Remove Account

Hi, Benjamin R. Zakarin wrote: > Therefore I implore of you to entirely scrub bzaka...@umich.edu from ALL > MAILING LISTS AND ANY REGISTRY. I don't know whether anybody listens here who has the power to do so. Did you already try the "Unsubscribe" button on

  1   2   3   4   5   >