Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.2.1, 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Assignee: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.2.1, 3.0
OpenEJB supports multicast and multipoint cluster configurations. We don't
have a mechanism for configuring peer servers
: public (Regular issues)
Components: ActiveMQ
Affects Versions: 2.2.1, 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Assignee: Kevan Miller
It's possible to configure master-slave configurations of ActiveMQ running
within a Geronimo server. However, when a BrokerService is going
All,
Note the following Travel Assistance information for ApacheCon 2010.
--kevan
Begin forwarded message:
From: Gav... ga...@16degrees.com.au
Date: May 16, 2010 7:25:39 PM EDT
To: p...@apache.org
Subject: [Travel Assistance] - Applications Open for ApacheCon NA 2010
Reply-To:
On May 16, 2010, at 10:33 PM, Ben Liang wrote:
Hi Donald,
I have signed ACL and my jira ID is ben.liang please kindly add me to the
contributor list.
Hi Ben,
You should have contributor rights, now. Look forward to your contributions!
--kevan
Minor points:
* Copyright date in the NOTICE file has not been updated
* The KEYS file should be deleted
* Can the .properties files be updated with source license headers? Their
content is trivial/nonsensical, but if syntactically possible would be better
to have a header...
Major point:
*
Thanks Rick. Looks good. Here's my +1.
Apologies about the xbean-finder-shaded mistake. I was confused by the
relocation pattern in the pom:
relocation
patternorg.objectweb.asm/pattern
Seeing some problems...
Following files do not have source license headers and IMO must:
pom.xml
container/openejb-osgi/src/main/resources/default.openejb.conf
Some could have them, I believe:
container/openejb-activemq4/src/main/resources/login.config
On May 11, 2010, at 1:48 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Every time I use jconsole I have to spend a long time trying to figure out
how to connect to geronimo. Not sure if its in the wiki but maybe if its on
the dev list I'll be able to find instructions again.
1. To get the mbeans in
On May 11, 2010, at 5:49 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On May 11, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On May 11, 2010, at 1:48 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Every time I use jconsole I have to spend a long time trying to figure out
how to connect to geronimo. Not sure if its in the wiki
On May 8, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Ivan wrote:
OK, thanks for all of your support, we pass the vote for Tomcat 7.0.0.1. I
will promote it to central repository later.
Three binding vote :
Rick, Ivan, and Joe Bohn.
Ivan,
IMO, calling this vote was premature. No strict guidelines were broken, so
+1
Source, signature/checksums, build, license/notice all look good.
--kevan
On May 7, 2010, at 8:30 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Please vote for the geronimo transaction manager component consisting of the
transaction manager and connector framework 3.0.
The main changes in this release are:
Source, signature/checksums look good. RAT looks good.
I'm unable to build, however. I get a missing dependency:
Missing:
--
1) com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-xjc:jar:2.2
I'm -1 until this is resolved.
--kevan
On May 5, 2010, at 7:31 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi
On May 10, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Source, signature/checksums look good. RAT looks good.
I'm unable to build, however. I get a missing dependency:
Missing:
--
1) com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-xjc:jar:2.2
I'm -1 until this is resolved.
I may have had a local maven
On May 10, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Source, signature/checksums look good. RAT looks good.
I'm unable to build, however. I get a missing dependency:
Missing:
--
1) com.sun.xml.bind:jaxb-xjc:jar:2.2
I'm -1 until this is resolved.
Apologies, my mistake... Build
On May 4, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
+1 (assuming the potential license issue mentioned below is not an issue)
I was able to build and run the new tomcat image.
The license issue pointed out last time is now resolved but there is one
other potential issue. I noticed a number
)
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Installed the Blog sample, ran it successfully. Stopped the server (kill -9 or
reboot your system ;-)
I get the following:
ka...@root Booting Geronimo Kernel (in Java 1.6.0_17)...
Starting Geronimo Application Server v3.0-SNAPSHOT
: deployment
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
running redeploy of the blog sample fails as follows:
$ ./deploy undeploy
../../samples/org.apache.aries.samples.blog.jpa.eba-0.1-incubating.eba
Using GERONIMO_HOME: /Users/kevan/Demo/geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-5284:
---
Description:
running redeploy of the blog sample fails as follows:
$ ./deploy redeploy
issues)
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
After undeploy of blog sample:
./deploy undeploy
../../samples/org.apache.aries.samples.blog.jpa.eba-0.1-incubating.eba
A subsequent deploy fails:
$ ./deploy deploy
../../samples
Wanted to let the Geronimo community know that Donald Woods is a new member of
the ASF. The ASF membership elected Donald in recognition of his many
contributions to Geronimo, OpenJPA, and Incubator projects.
Congrats to Donald on this well deserved achievement!
--kevan
This is breaking 2.2 builds because of an updated dependency. It's adding a new
dependency on org.bouncycastle bcprov-jdk15. We have our own geronimo-crypto
library (which was created due to patent issues with bouncycastle library. A
new non-patent encumbered bouncycastle jar was created, I
On May 2, 2010, at 2:17 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Anyone else seeing this test failure trace in the tomcat module? I think I
have up to date tomcat external and tomcat plugin...
I'm seeing the same failure.
--kevan
FYI. Forwarding the ApacheCon CFP from annou...@apachecon.com
--kevan
On Apr 28, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Sally Khudairi wrote:
ApacheCon North America 2010
1-5 November 2010 -- Westin Peachtree in Atlanta
Technical Tracks: Call For Participation
All submissions must be received by Friday, 28 May
http://geronimo.apache.org/ is not correct -- there are problems in the
left-hand column. I'm guessing that it has been caused by the recent confluence
changes. Anybody able to look at this?
--kevan
On Apr 29, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
On 4/29/10 8:26 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
http://geronimo.apache.org/ is not correct -- there are problems in the
left-hand column. I'm guessing that it has been caused by the recent
confluence changes. Anybody able to look at this?
--kevan
On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing
information properly. Thanks!
One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have
svn:eol-style=native
On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing
information properly
On Apr 27, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/27/2010 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan
+1
Signatures, checksums, rat, build, license/notice all look good.
--kevan
On Apr 23, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.5 or
2.1.6-SNAPSHOT server from OpenJPA 1.x to
Hi Donald,
Looks pretty good. I wasn't able to install on a 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT server,
however. Is it working for you?
2010-04-27 20:54:53,060 ERROR [PluginInstallerGBean] Unable to install plugin
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.MissingDependencyException: Plugin is not
installable on
On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
We have had a couple of fixes in the 2.2 branch since the Geronimo 2.2 was
released. Maybe it's time to release Geronimo 2.2.1 to bring all the
available fixes to Geronimo users.
If everybody agree to release the new 2.2.1 release. I'd
is to promote, then fix, but
maybe they can be fixed before promotion.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 25, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I'm seeing one blocker issue -- all of the checksums that I have downloaded
do not match the corresponding checksums that I compute. For instance
Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing
information properly. Thanks!
One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have
svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the
file type in our recommended client
I'm seeing one blocker issue -- all of the checksums that I have downloaded do
not match the corresponding checksums that I compute. For instance:
$ md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat
yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz.md5
md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat
On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Here are 3 scripts attached to help checkout, rat:check and build the
tags in the vote.
Thanks for the scripts. A few comments:
1) We are voting on source artifacts, not svn. So, I use wget. (e.g. 'wget
--no-check-certificate
On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Can we ignore the following rat:check failures?
geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 -
src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/xml.xsd
src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd
geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7 -
Looks good. Thanks Rick! Here's my +1
--kevan
On Apr 22, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single
vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6.
Delos,
For scanning mailing list history, it's helpful if you update the Subject with
a [RESULT]
--kevan
On Apr 23, 2010, at 3:54 AM, Delos wrote:
Besides, we also get +1 from Ashish and Forrest, thanks!
2010/4/23 Delos dait...@gmail.com
GEP RC1 passed the voting with following result
0:
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5268
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.2, 2.1.5, 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Errors like the following are difficult to debug/diagnose. We should do
something to make
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5269
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.2, 2.1.5, 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Failures of the following sort provide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-5269.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
oops.
ContainerBase.addChild: start: LifecycleException
On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
I've been working on moving the org.apache.geronimo.bundles components out of
the server tree into its own top-level project so these bundles can be
released separately. The working copy can be found here:
Signature/checksums look good. I ran RAT and built successfully. Will leave the
testing for others. Here's my +1
--kevan
On Apr 18, 2010, at 10:28 PM, Delos wrote:
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse
Plugin 2.1.5 RC1.
The source code zip is here:
Rick,
I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency
issues. For example:
ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be
geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1.
jaxb 2.2 has a dependency on geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.3 not
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/21/2010 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Rick,
I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency
issues. For example:
ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be
geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-5244:
---
Summary: Upgrade to AMQ 5.3.1 (was: Upgrade to AMQ 5.1.3)
Upgrade to AMQ 5.3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-5244.
--
Resolution: Fixed
No apparent problems.
Upgrade to AMQ 5.3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4871.
--
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Not seeing this problem on 2.2 with Java 6. Java 5 doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4991:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
Update AXIS2 stack to 1.5.1
On Apr 19, 2010, at 4:27 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
Dear all,
News has been published in homepage: http://geronimo.apache.org/
Artifacts has been published in: http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.1.5/ ,
will it sync to mirrors in 24 hours?
I've (again) pulled the artifacts from geronimo/2.1.5
On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.0.7
Hi Rick,
This wasn't quite the spec version that I was expecting...
Our last javamail spec release was: geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.6
So, I was expecting something like geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.0
Was
All,
Please note the following and take action as appropriate.
--kevan
Begin forwarded message:
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Date: April 10, 2010 1:24:14 PM EDT
To: commun...@apache.org
Subject: [NOTICE] compromised jira passwords
Reply-To: commun...@apache.org
Hello Apache
Thanks for the update, Rick.
Have you made the OpenJPA community aware of this issue?
--kevan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854915#action_12854915
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5243:
Hmm. It's in a build that I ran last
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-5243.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
I must have been looking at the activemq-server test assembly
+1
I checked signature/checksums, source files, build, testsuite, and simple tests
with a server. All looked good to me. Assuming we pass the TCK, we should be
good to go...
--kevan
On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:46 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
Dear All,
I have managed to use maven-release-plugin to make a
On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:39 PM, David Jencks wrote:
In my efforts to see how much ejb stuff works in trunk I've found that we
need at least a little bit of corba to get anywhere, at least the
HandleDelegate, so I'm going to be trying to enable the corba stuff as little
as possible to be able
Level: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 2.2.1, 3.0
On branches/2.2 I'm able to access http://localhost:8080/activemq-console
without authentication. Since I'm able to inspect Destinations, delete
Destinations, etc
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Assignee: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.2.1
AMQ 5.3.1 has been released with a number of fixes. We should upgrade
branches/2.2...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:18 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
Hi All,
We prepared some samples regarding Jave EE 6 new features, so far including
these:
Hi Forrest,
Cool. It's not quite clear to me how much work has been done and who has done
the work. I'm now wondering if this is significant enough
On Apr 5, 2010, at 9:23 AM, Ivan wrote:
For geronimo-schema-java1.4 and java 5 schemas, I wish somebody could
double-check the descriptions in the license and notice files in the
geronimo-schema-javaee_6 before moving them out. I have mentioned it in the
past, and Donald gave me some
On Mar 31, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
We'll also be upgrading 2.2.1 to use this level of Tomcat, right?
Absolutely should be.
--kevan
On Mar 31, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
2) For our dependencies, will we need real releases, or will we ship
snapshots based on know revision levels?
Definitely real releases, IMO.
If we have specific instances where we don't think this is possible, we can
discuss alternatives.
+1
I checked source, signature/checksums, and build. All looked good.
--kevan
On Mar 24, 2010, at 10:44 PM, Delos wrote:
This voting is for tomcat-parent-6.0.26. It will be used by Geronimo
2.1.5.It's based on tomcat 6.0.26, built with maven. Besides, we also applied
some patches which
)
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
Starting the geronimo server on trunk is currently very verbose. There are a
lot of BlueprintContainer messages as Karaf is starting. That's followed by the
Karaf banner. Finally, followed by the Geronimo startup
)
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
Starting up Karaf seems to consume a fair amount of time as a Geronimo server
is started. Is it needed? I think we should consider slimming down the server
startup. I'm not sure what it's buying us
: public (Regular issues)
Components: commands
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
The current set of Geronimo commands (geronimo, deploy, start, stop, shutdown,
admin, client) need to be reviewed for functionality. Mostly, they are adopting
I'm curious to hear the community's thoughts about starting to pull together a
3.0 Milestone release. I think there's been a lot of progress on trunk and that
it would be valuable to start pulling things together for a release.
If anything, just planning for a release starts to identify hat
Thanks Rex. Makes sense.
I guess that's consistent with our treatment of server-security-config
dependencies, but I'm not convinced we're handling them correctly. Pretty
certain that we can build alternate assemblies with the same basic problem...
--kevan
On Mar 24, 2010, at 5:40 AM,
On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Marco Laponder wrote:
Hi
I am a newbi at building geronimo so it could be by lack of knowledge,in that
case forgive me. I am trying to build the 2.2 branch from source. I am at the
latest revision (927171) and followed the instructions at
On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:57 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
Thanks. So it sounds like it will be pretty much a *requirement* that
applications on 3.0 need to be fully OSGi bundles,
Well, the idea is that the geronimo deployment process will turn
On Mar 24, 2010, at 5:30 PM, David Jencks wrote:
While I always thought shared lib was a bad idea, at least pre-osgi the
concept of a classloader that you could just toss things in made sense. I
don't think it makes any sense in osgi. There is no dynamic-export header so
whatever
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4957.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2.1
2.1.5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-5200:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
high cpu load, probably result of concurrent access
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-5200:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Fix Version/s: 2.2.1
2.1.5
high
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-5200.
Resolution: Fixed
Should be fixed. Now using ConcurrentHashMap, instead of HashSet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12848705#action_12848705
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5198:
Is your SharedLib a dependency of your
Sending this to any Geronimo committers having problems committing to svn.
SVN authentication is now using LDAP. See the instructions below, about
changing your LDAP password, if you do not know your LDAP password.
This information was sent to committ...@a.o. If you are an ASF Committer, you
/browse/GERONIMO-5204
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.1.5, 2.2.1
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2.1
Looks like there's a problem
Apologies for the broadcast message...
In thinking about ApacheCon 2010, I began to wonder if there is interest in
creating an Enterprise Java track for the conference. I think there is the
potential for a lot of interesting content. Many of our projects are busy
implementing JSR specs for
On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
Will Tomcat community plan to apply our fixes to their code base soon? If
not, because this Friday we will ship release candidate build of G 2.1.5, I
prefer to remove Spnego support this time.
The related JIRAs that need to revert are:
On Mar 19, 2010, at 12:46 AM, Nandeesh wrote:
I am trying deploy servicemix JBI componet servicemix-web-3.2.3.war file on
geronimo version geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1.4 but getting following
exception HttpManagedServlet - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
+1
Source and build all look good.
--kevan
On Mar 3, 2010, at 4:23 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo 2.1.5 release,I would like to release
txmanager-2.1.4. However, we need a full TCK against it.
Staging repo:
Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.1.5
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.1.5
I'm seeing a lot of log messages during startup of a G 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT tomcat
java ee server, that I didn't see in 2.1.4. They should be cleaned up...
INFO: Set JAAS app name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846023#action_12846023
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5185:
Hmm. Are you sure the original hot
On Mar 16, 2010, at 6:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm thinking of porting the work to deal with retrying stuff that didnt work
(GERONIMO-5152) in the tx manager component from trunk back to the 2.1
branch. However, this changes the interaction between the connection
management and the tx
: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.0
There are multiple updates in the latest Jetty 8.0.0.M0 release which are
breaking the build
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-5182:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
Fix compile errors caused by Jetty 8.0.0.M0 release
On Mar 11, 2010, at 3:54 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
Hi Jarek,
Could you help update the scripts?
I'm curious why?
--kevan
On Mar 11, 2010, at 3:54 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
Hi Jarek,
Could you help update the scripts?
Read more of my mail... ;-) So, I assume *why* is because of the move to
Genesis 2.0. So, brings up a new question... ;-) Why update G 2.1 to use
Genesis 2.0?
--kevan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4959.
--
Resolution: Invalid
I can only assume I had a configuration problem.
For remote deploy
On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
Yes, as Forrest said, I want to move to use maven-release-plugin to help the
2.1.5 release.
Please check:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-release-process.html
I'm familiar with the release process. As the 2.1 branch predated this
On Mar 10, 2010, at 3:31 AM, de...@apache.org wrote:
Author: delos
Date: Wed Mar 10 08:31:28 2010
New Revision: 921247
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921247view=rev
Log:
make trunk build successfully with v30 adapter integration
Added:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844344#action_12844344
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4959:
Must be dependent upon network/os
On Mar 9, 2010, at 2:54 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
Hi, David Blevins,
Since openejb 3.0.2 is a dependency to G 2.1.5, and I don't find any work
related with this in openejb mailing list, could you please tell us the exact
time when it will be released?
Hi Rex,
It's best to communicate this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12843188#action_12843188
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-5175:
Upgrading your JDK level is a good idea
On Mar 9, 2010, at 7:40 PM, djen...@apache.org wrote:
Author: djencks
Date: Wed Mar 10 00:40:46 2010
New Revision: 921195
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921195view=rev
Log:
don't include junit in our server
snip
Modified: geronimo/server/trunk/framework/pom.xml
URL:
Congrats Forrest!
--kevan
On Mar 8, 2010, at 8:54 PM, Ivan wrote:
I would like to welcome Forrest aboard, as he recently accepted the Geronimo
PMC invitation to become a committer. His account (xiaming) was just
created, so you should start seeing some commits from him soon.
--
Ivan
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:58 AM, Delos wrote:
Hi all,
Johannes suggested that GEP make release more frequently. The reason is user
may get new fixes earlier, instead of waiting for next release together with
Geronimo server. In this way, it will be more convenient for GEP to provide
new
On Mar 3, 2010, at 4:54 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
My point is that you should run TCK first and show results first before any
voting...
We often run TCK concurrent with a vote. So, it's not an issue, IMO. The vote
passing can be contingent on TCK looking good.
A note about TCK runs for
801 - 900 of 3005 matches
Mail list logo
