+1
Am 11/1/11 9:16 AM, schrieb Bernd Bohmann:
+1 for the idea
but -1 for the name. I expect trouble with the Apache Incubator.
What is the difference between Apache Incubator and Apache MyFaces Incubator?
If there is a difference we should consider a different name.
I would prefer labs,
FWIW:
-1
why introducing yet another level of incubation process ?
I find it (very) problematic trying to be in some sort of
competition w/ the Apache Incubator...
(even if the discussed targets here are JSF specific)
Why not simply moving future (MyFaces) GSoC directly to the Apache
Labs
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW:
-1
why introducing yet another level of incubation process ?
I find it (very) problematic trying to be in some sort of
competition w/ the Apache Incubator...
(even if the discussed targets here are JSF
thx matt for the links
regards,
gerhard
2011/11/2 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW:
-1
why introducing yet another level of incubation process ?
I find it (very) problematic trying to be in some sort of
i think we should stop the vote and re-visit the original thread at [1].
there we could discuss the name and we could re-visit the option to
use the asf incubator directly (for gsoc projects).
regards,
gerhard
[1] http://markmail.org/message/d7oogfabvliwn7fg
2011/11/2 Gerhard Petracek
Why incubator for Gsoc projects?
IMO that's wrong.
Move stuff like that to Labs: build code and get releases out (release
often, release early)
Once there is interest - by some community decide where to go:
There some options, like:
a) Going to the incubator - start to build a community around
besides labs (see [1]) i agree for the existing gsoc projects like:
- component library for html5 components
- webapp-test btw. webapp-test2 (manila)
- codi-rad
i'm perfectly fine with a) since the basic topic was the quick
community check.
- we should start a new thread for checking potential
+1 for the idea
but -1 for the name. I expect trouble with the Apache Incubator.
What is the difference between Apache Incubator and Apache MyFaces Incubator?
If there is a difference we should consider a different name.
I would prefer labs, sandbox or what ever.
Regards
Bernd Bohmann
On Tue,
hi bernd,
the name might be difficult. e.g. there is also an area called apache
labs [1] and we have sandbox modules without such rules.
regards,
gerhard
[1] http://labs.apache.org
2011/11/1 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com:
+1 for the idea
but -1 for the name. I expect trouble with
The description of apache labs is:
Apache Labs is a place for innovation where committers of the
foundation can experiment with new ideas.
This modified description of Apache Myfaces Incubator/labs/sandbox
would perfectly fit for MyFaces:
Apache MyFaces Labs is a place for innovation where
+1 for the idea!
I agree with Bernd about the name. For me, incubator is also associated
with rules and legal stuff. We should encourage people to contribute,
instead of scaring them away. Sandbox or labs sounds encouraging and
accessible. But perhaps we should discuss/vote the name in another
hi bernd,
the description of the apache incubator is:
The Incubator project is the entry path into The Apache Software
Foundation (ASF) for projects and codebases wishing to become part of
the Foundation's efforts. All code donations from external
organisations and existing external projects
hi bart,
as mentioned [1] by mark it's also about ip clearance [2].
regards,
gerhard
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/201110.mbox/%3c1319274310.93350.yahoomail...@web27807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com%3E
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
http://www.irian.at
+1
Regards,
Jakob
2011/11/1 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
Hi,
in order to check if there is a community for a new sub-project (esp.
GSoC projects for MyFaces), we discussed [1] the introduction of an
internal incubator.
We would release such projects early and e.g. after a
Ok,
if there is no real difference between Apache Incubator and Apache
MyFaces Incubator,
I have to change my vote to
-1
especially a have a problem with:
All code donations from external organisations and
existing external projects wishing to join MyFaces enter through the
MyFaces-Incubator.
hi bernd,
i just changed the text of the incubator as you did with the text of
labs to show that it fits better because the primary goal is the
community check (+ we can never ignore ip clearance).
we just don't need the overhead of the incubator and the incubation
phase is very short.
we are
] Internal Incubator
Ok,
if there is no real difference between Apache Incubator and Apache
MyFaces Incubator,
I have to change my vote to
-1
especially a have a problem with:
All code donations from external organisations and
existing external projects wishing to join MyFaces
Hi,
in order to check if there is a community for a new sub-project (esp.
GSoC projects for MyFaces), we discussed [1] the introduction of an
internal incubator.
We would release such projects early and e.g. after a quarter we
decide if we keep and promote a project (as a sub-project or a module
18 matches
Mail list logo
