[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker closed OFBIZ-3066.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 9.04)
Hi Pierre,
most of your
Hi Jacques,
I think the two concepts are mutually exclusive, it is completely
valid to maintain a vendor branch while developing a hot-deploy
component. For example you might maintain a vendor branch for the
patches you've submitted to jira that haven't yet been incorporated
into the
I disagree, there always have been and always will be bugs in OFBiz,
there is no escaping this fact. The only reason there are more bugs
now than there were 3 years ago is because there is more community
activity. Fixing the bugs in jira will not prevent new bugs from
replacing them (and
Inline...
From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
I think a direct link on he main page is better, it shows how alive a
project is
I agree, feel free...
thanks for the pointer on ofbiz.be...is fixed now( we moved dns and
this record was forgotten
Good, for the French
Please Scott,
Inline...
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
I disagree, there always have been and always will be bugs in OFBiz,
there is no escaping this fact. The only reason there are more bugs
now than there were 3 years ago is because there is more community
activity.
Thank you Jacques for addressing this as this situation worries me
too. Although I think the power of the Ofbiz community can handle it
:-)
My suggestions would be:
- Assign volunteers and a lead to each of the components. They can
watch issues of their components and should can be consulted if
On 7/12/2009, at 10:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Please Scott,
Inline...
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
I disagree, there always have been and always will be bugs in
OFBiz, there is no escaping this fact. The only reason there are
more bugs now than there were 3 years ago
Hi all,
I have looked mainly into the SFA and Project Mgt components over the last
few months and am more than willing to help these components (for starters)
forward. Even in a greater role than just providing feedback.
Regards, Pierre.
2009/12/7 Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Thanks Hans!
Hans Baker wrote:
ok Sam agreedthat is how we have used it here...however now renamed
to ofbizwebsite.
regards,
Hans
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:29 +0800, Sam Hamilton wrote:
Hi Hans - I think the name of the folder is a bit confusing to anyone
browsing the file structure,
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Don't misundersand me. I'm not worried about new bugs. I totally
understand that this is intrinsic nature of software.
My point is only for us to give more love to these 109 issues waiting
attention in Jira, nothing else...
Jacques,
I think we should prioritize the
On 7/12/2009, at 10:22 PM, Jeroen van der Wal wrote:
Thank you Jacques for addressing this as this situation worries me
too. Although I think the power of the Ofbiz community can handle it
:-)
My suggestions would be:
- Assign volunteers and a lead to each of the components. They can
watch
Hans,
No worries We just differ sometimes in opinions. We both want to enhance
OfBiz to the best of our beliefs and abillities.
Regards,
Pierre
2009/12/7 Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
Hi Pierre,
your involvement is more than welcome, remind me when i am a bit
slow :-)
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Hi Jacques,
I think the two concepts are mutually exclusive, it is completely valid to maintain a vendor branch while developing a hot-deploy
component. For example you might maintain a vendor branch for the patches you've submitted to jira that
Mountpoint for the ofbiz website
Key: OFBIZ-3313
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3313
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Erwan de FERRIERES
From: Jeroen van der Wal jvander...@stromboli.it
Thank you Jacques for addressing this as this situation worries me
too. Although I think the power of the Ofbiz community can handle it
:-)
My suggestions would be:
- Assign volunteers and a lead to each of the components. They can
watch issues
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
On 7/12/2009, at 10:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Please Scott,
Inline...
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
I disagree, there always have been and always will be bugs in OFBiz, there is no escaping this fact. The only reason there
Thanks Bilgin,
Yes this seems fine to me
Jacques
() ascii ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org
From: Bilgin Ibryam bibr...@gmail.com
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Don't misundersand me. I'm not worried about new bugs. I totally
understand that this is intrinsic nature of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-3313:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-3313.diff
Mountpoint for the ofbiz website
I take it your planning on cleaning this up?
A few issues from a quick look at the Thai version:
- The products page features OFBiz (which links to the service page
mentioned below), OpenTravelSystem (which redirects to
antwebsystems.com) and opentaps
- The service page advertises Hans
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3313.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Erwan,
Your patch is in trunk at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker reopened OFBIZ-3313:
I am sorry i do not agree with this
the website should be at he root, then a button to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12786891#action_12786891
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3313:
I agree Hans,
For me it was a temporary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2208.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Release Branch 9.04
Assignee: Adrian Crum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12786900#action_12786900
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-3313:
---
it was the simpliest way of
Hi Tim,
For the page http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/index.html
If possible it would be great to have also the runtime logs accessible. I guess
it's possible but I'm not sure where to find them on ofbiz-vm.apache.org
We need to say that java 1.6 must be used with trunk and may be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12786907#action_12786907
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3313:
Hi Erwan,
Looks like your Shift button is
Hi all,
I've got 3 compiler warnings when compiling OFBiz, listed here :
* File: UtilXml.java, Line: 57,
org.apache.xml.serialize.OutputFormat in org.apache.xml.serialize has
been deprecated
* File: ShoppingCartEvents.java, Line: 253,
Resolve compiler warnings
-
Key: OFBIZ-3314
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3314
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: product
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-3314:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-3314.diff
Resolve compiler warnings
-
Hi Scott,
had some time to look at it this weekend?
if not more objections i plan to commit the birt branch to the trunk
this week. Thank you for your time spend on this subject.
Regards,
Hans
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 01:18 +1300, Scott Gray wrote:
.
Did you look at the New Revision:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12786920#action_12786920
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-3313:
---
Yeah, I know... Still trying to
Hi all,
we've got a CI server, with a junit historic on it, at this address :
http://selenium.neogia.org/junit.html
For some days, we've succeeded in having no errors and no failures, but
since the 5th, we've got 4 failures on
* auto-tests-glPostingOnCancelCheckRun
*
Thanks For report Erwan, we will take care of it.
--
Thanks and Regards
Sumit Pandit
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:12 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Hi all,
we've got a CI server, with a junit historic on it, at this address :
http://selenium.neogia.org/junit.html
For some days, we've succeeded
Hi Scott:
Then stop the committing and do some reviewing. There is more to
software development than committing code to a repository.
Regards,
Ruth
Scott Gray wrote:
On 7/12/2009, at 10:22 PM, Jeroen van der Wal wrote:
Thank you Jacques for addressing this as this situation worries me
too.
Hello David and Other List Members:
Is there anyway to tell how many downloads have occurred recently (last
month, 6 months) at the official OFBiz download site:
http://build.ofbiz.org?
TIA
Ruth
ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com
Want to know more
I am not aware of any such tracking system in place.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hello David and Other List Members:
Is there anyway to tell how many downloads
No - I don't think those statistics are in place, but it is something we can do
when we get this moved over to the ASF infrastructure - which should be really
easy. I sent out a link to it this weekend - check it out and let us know how
it works for you.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax
Hans, let us know when this is back to just the community information. If it's
going to be a while, we should likely remove it and you can patch your local
version for you website. Wouldn't exactly be ok for us to make the English
version all about HotWax Media :)
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Dec 7,
Did all of this go to legal like was requested? If not, then it's a -1 to
commit this to the trunk.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Hi Scott,
had some time to look at it
Inline
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Dec 7, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Tim,
For the page http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/index.html
If possible it would be great to have also the runtime logs accessible. I
guess it's possible but I'm not sure where to find them on
Hi Tim:
First, thanks for the prompt reply. Could you please resupply the link?
Regards,
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
No - I don't think those statistics are in place, but it is something we can do
when we get this moved over to the ASF infrastructure - which should be really
easy. I sent out a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3314.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Erwan,
Your patch is in trunk at
Just a quick thing I noticed while looking at this again: this won't prevent
conflicts in multi-server deployments.
-David
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:00 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Mon Dec 7 13:00:09 2009
New Revision: 887916
URL:
Ruth,
Why don't you consider using one of the release branches?
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Scott:
Then stop the committing and do some reviewing. There is
From: Brett Palmer brettgpal...@gmail.com
Ruth,
You make a good point. This has been a topic for a couple of years now. As
OFBiz continues to grow doing even a simple smoke test on the build will
be difficult. This is why I think the only scalable solution is to run a
series of automated
Ha yes!
It's only better for a sile OFBiz instance :/ (and we have still not feedback
on performances)
What would you suggest ? If I remember well Karim's solution was good but
without an upgrade path...
Jacques
() ascii ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org
From:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-2135:
Reopened at [André Herbst's demand|http://markmail.org/message/pu3d4dfyqfuljfdq]
I think
I will look into this and try to find a solution.
-Adrian
David E Jones wrote:
One option might be to put this in, but commented out so it is just an example
in a comment. There is at least one other comment with example code for Oracle
in the entity engine, though I can't remember where it
Just in the build and log sites message right below this one:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/index.html
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 7, 2009, at 8:58 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Tim:
First, thanks
Jacques,
Anyone wanting to have detailed records of every server hit will have to
expect it to affect performance. You can't track server hits for free.
If performance becomes a problem, there is another way to do
synchronization that would be a little faster.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux
Hi Tim:
OK, I'm really stupid. I don't see where you might be referring to. This
points me to an (old - I presume since it still says to use Java 1.5)
download site. Are you saying that at some point, someone will put a
download counter on this or a similar page?
TIA
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
Hi Anil:
I feel like I'm spitting in the wind here...Please, let's just start
this conversation over again. Under the following circumstances, which
version or release of OFBiz should I use?
I'm a new user and I want to customize my OFBiz instance for a new ERP
deployment.
TIA
Ruth
Find me
This page might be helpful, and answers the more general question behind the
question:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Apache+OFBiz+Getting+Started
-David
On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Anil:
I feel like I'm spitting in the wind here...Please,
Yes - that would be the idea. It's not old - it's just not the current one so
we haven't updated the text yet - per another thread here where Jacques and I
were commenting.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 7, 2009, at
Ruth,
Its depends on How you plan to work.
If a
1) branch has all features you need
2) you plan to only customize for business use
3) Don't plan to contribute enhancements to Ofbiz trunk.
Then
Use Branch
Else If
1) You need features from latest trunk
2) You don't care
Hi Tim:
Again, thanks for the quick reply. Should I just keep checking the site
to see when someone might get around to putting the download counter on
it? Or, should I request that a site administrator put a download
counter on that web page?
TIA
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
Yes - that would be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12786998#action_12786998
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3274:
Bruno,
I'm confused. In your initial comment, you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco closed OFBIZ-3271.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed with minor last.minute changes in trunk At revision: 888030
Storing
HI David:
If that resource is the definitive answer, then why does that BIG FAT
DOWNLOAD button/link point to a trunk build? Shouldn't it point to a
release branch tag build with a good probability of working?
Am I missing something here?
Am I not reading all this information correctly?
Why
You will need to get with Apache Infrastructure as a request. I also do not
think you should put the counter on the page, but instead have the counter be
something we have access to do update documentation and use appropriately.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
Bruno,
Don't forget the UserPreference entity also has a userPrefGroupTypeId
field, so you could group the collapsed settings by screen. That would
solve the shared id problem.
-Adrian
bus...@apache.org wrote:
Author: buscob
Date: Mon Dec 7 17:24:21 2009
New Revision: 888030
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787011#action_12787011
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3274:
Adrian,
I said In the patch I updated all catalog
Thank you Adrian,
but then how to the theme loaded easily? The global ones are already
loaded along the selected theme etc.
-Bruno
2009/12/7 Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com:
Bruno,
Don't forget the UserPreference entity also has a userPrefGroupTypeId field,
so you could group the collapsed
Expanded/collapsed has nothing to do with themes.
-Adrian
Bruno Busco wrote:
Thank you Adrian,
but then how to the theme loaded easily? The global ones are already
loaded along the selected theme etc.
-Bruno
2009/12/7 Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com:
Bruno,
Don't forget the UserPreference
Bruno Busco wrote:
Thank you Adrian,
but then how to the theme loaded easily? The global ones are already
loaded along the selected theme etc.
-Bruno
Or you can combine the screen name and sceenlet id for the preference
key, instead of (screenlet.id+_collapsed )
Bilgin
Adrian,
sorry for the bad sentence, I couldn't even read myself.
I meant that GLOBAL_PREFERENCES gets already loaded in the ApplicationDecorator.
So now we have two options to have screenlets with the same id saved
indipendently:
1) Use a screen related userPrefGroupTypeId.
2) Combine the screen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787040#action_12787040
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3274:
I don't agree that multi-column layout is defined
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787040#action_12787040
]
Adrian Crum edited comment on OFBIZ-3274 at 12/7/09 6:39 PM:
-
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787049#action_12787049
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3274:
Agreed ! ;-)
I assume that:
-
screen name=MyScreen
section
actions
service service-name=getUserPreferenceGroup
field-map field-name=userPrefGroupTypeId
value=MyScreen/
/service
set field=screenSettings from-field=userPrefMap/
/actions
...
This would mean to change all the screens! :-(
2009/12/7 Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com:
screen name=MyScreen
section
actions
service service-name=getUserPreferenceGroup
field-map field-name=userPrefGroupTypeId
value=MyScreen/
/service
Scott Gray wrote:
+1, those changes went in a little sooner than I would have liked
(before the vote had even started I think) and would have preferred to
see the documentation updated first by the people pushing for this change.
I'm the one who did this. The changes went in after the vote
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Tim:
Sorry, unless otherwise stated I always go to what has been advertised
as the official OFBiz download site: http://ofbiz.apache.org and hit
the big DOWNLOAD OFBIZ link.
Now, for a little vent: What is wrong with the file at this point? You
ask. I'll tell you
Could we move this somehow in the screen widget?
2009/12/7 Bruno Busco bruno.bu...@gmail.com:
This would mean to change all the screens! :-(
2009/12/7 Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com:
screen name=MyScreen
section
actions
service service-name=getUserPreferenceGroup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787057#action_12787057
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3313:
---
Just for the record, I don't think this should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787058#action_12787058
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3274:
You are correct.
The concept could be expanded
Then do the same thing in the model widget code.
-Adrian
Bruno Busco wrote:
This would mean to change all the screens! :-(
2009/12/7 Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com:
screen name=MyScreen
section
actions
service service-name=getUserPreferenceGroup
field-map
Also as I just mentioned in OFBIZ-3313, I don't think this should be
root in the trunk at all. It should be at the top level of the svn
repo just as the current website is and downloaded into the hot-deploy
folder of our demo instance during deployment.
Regards
Scott
On 8/12/2009, at 4:48
Hi Ruppert
Hans ended up removing the code which was of concern so the issues
that I suggested he discuss with legal are no longer present.
Regards
Scott
On 8/12/2009, at 4:49 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Did all of this go to legal like was requested? If not, then it's a
-1 to commit this to
Hi Ruth,
I agree with you on having a branch for the JDK switch (as I propose
to use branches for every change) but it doesn't help to be so
ruthless (what's in a name) towards the community. I use Max OSX too
and are still not able to run Ofbiz from trunk. First I had a JDK
issue which I was
Awesome! Thanks for letting me know Scott.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 7, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Ruppert
Hans ended up removing the code which was of concern so the issues that I
suggested
I suppose we are shameless optimists and hope that people will choose to
collaborate with other people using the software, and perhaps even participate
in the development.
Still, I agree the big download button is a bad design and I never liked it
given that there are various options to
Hans Bakker wrote:
Hi Scott,
had some time to look at it this weekend?
if not more objections i plan to commit the birt branch to the trunk
this week. Thank you for your time spend on this subject.
Regards,
Hans
I need more time to look into this. I had my big birthday party bash
on
David E Jones wrote:
Just a quick thing I noticed while looking at this again: this won't prevent
conflicts in multi-server deployments.
-David
This patch is completely, 100% wrong, and won't fix the problem.
install ofbiz, install demo data, run it.
/usr/sbin/ab -c30 -t 50
Have you visited the related Jira issue?
I can repeat the problem with my local machine, and the patch does
indeed fix it.
I agree it doesn't solve the multi-server issue. I don't know why the
original idea of a sequence ID wasn't used.
-Adrian
Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
A while ago a saw a great video on Git by Bart Trojanowski. It's quite
lenghty (approx 2 hours) but after that you can decide for yourself if you
want to give it try. There's also some interesting stuff on how Linux
manages their vast codebase. So instead of a Friday night movie rental sit
back
On Dec 7, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
Just a quick thing I noticed while looking at this again: this won't prevent
conflicts in multi-server deployments.
-David
This patch is completely, 100% wrong, and won't fix the problem.
install ofbiz, install
From: David E Jones d...@me.com
I suppose we are shameless optimists and hope that people will choose to collaborate with other people using the software, and
perhaps even participate in the development.
Still, I agree the big download button is a bad design and I never liked it given that
David E Jones wrote:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
Just a quick thing I noticed while looking at this again: this won't
prevent conflicts in multi-server deployments.
-David
This patch is completely, 100% wrong, and won't fix the problem.
install
On 8/12/2009, at 8:09 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
+1, those changes went in a little sooner than I would have liked
(before the vote had even started I think) and would have preferred
to
see the documentation updated first by the people pushing for this
change.
I'm the one
Scott Gray wrote:
On 8/12/2009, at 8:09 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
+1, those changes went in a little sooner than I would have liked
(before the vote had even started I think) and would have preferred to
see the documentation updated first by the people pushing for this
Reverted at r888111 in trunk, R9.04 at r888113
Jacques
() ascii ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
David E Jones wrote:
Just a quick thing I noticed while looking at this again: this won't prevent
conflicts in multi-server
Most of the major projects have a big DOWNLOAD button - it's a good idea - and
I'd be surprised if a call to action does not encourage more people to download.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 7, 2009, at 12:55 PM,
When you run Ofbiz on OSX using the latest Java 1.6 update you will get this
exception:
Exception: java.io.IOException
Message: Keystore was tampered with, or password was incorrect
According to another ML Apple changed the password of the keystore from
changeit to changeme:
On 8/12/2009, at 9:06 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 8/12/2009, at 8:09 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
+1, those changes went in a little sooner than I would have liked
(before the vote had even started I think) and would have
preferred to
see the documentation
Hi Jeroen,
I encountered this as well and ended up fixing it by making a fresh
copy of the keystore:
cd /Users/yourusername
keytool -importkeystore -srckeystore /System/Library/Frameworks/
JavaVM.framework/Versions/A/Resources/Deploy.bundle/Contents/Home/lib/
security/cacerts -destkeystore
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Reverted at r888111 in trunk, R9.04 at r888113
Actually, there's more to this.
If you are *just* using ControlServlet parts of ofbiz, which does
serverhit stuff, then you will probably never ever hit this bug.
However, when using webslinger, which is a faster rendering
Adam Heath wrote:
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Reverted at r888111 in trunk, R9.04 at r888113
Actually, there's more to this.
If you are *just* using ControlServlet parts of ofbiz, which does
serverhit stuff, then you will probably never ever hit this bug.
However, when using webslinger,
Hi Hans,
No I'm sorry I'm afraid I didn't find time for a full review, however
all of the licensing issues I initially raised appear to have been
resolved, so from that point of view I am fine with it being
committed. From a functional point of view I'm guess we can tidy up
anything
Thanks Scott,
There's one but: keytool creates the new keystore in the source folder so
the mv commands in your script fail. I found a shortcut to simply change the
password:
sudo keytool -keystore
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
