Thanks so much Ashish. Hans, whenever you have a chance to supply a brief bit
about your new component it would be hugely helpful in having the community
help to reconcile these together. Thanks again everybody.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
Hello
Hello Tim,
I have already sent my comments before few days: (Sending here once
again for your reference)
-
Hello Hans | Tim,
Here are major points for your ready reference that are supported/
present in the eBay component before the introduction of ebaystore
component:
Hello Tim,
I have already sent my comments before few days: (Sending here once
again for your reference)
-
Hello Hans | Tim,
Here are major points for your ready reference that are supported/
present in the eBay component before the introduction of ebaystore
component:
Just wanted to bump this since we're now approaching the middle of the month.
Ashish, if you can point Hans to your writeup I'm sure this will help get this
party started.
I'd really like to see this consolidated before the release candidate gets put
together in early April - and I'm sure a
Hello Hans | Tim,
Here are major points for your ready reference that are supported/
present in the eBay component before the introduction of ebaystore
component:
* Multiple product store handling support in which you can maintain
the relevant data for your product, category OOTB.
* With
Hans, I see you've been busy again in the ebaystore and just wanted to get an
update on when we might be able to see what's going on so that the community
can help get back to the single ebay component again soon. I hope things are
going well on that new impl!
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 16,
Hi Ruppert,
can at the moment only repeat what i said before...let us first finish
it we plan to finish it at the end of this month, more probably next
week
Regards,
Hans
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 00:01 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Hans, I see you've been busy again in the ebaystore and just
Great - looking forward to hearing more next week - good luck on the rest of it.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 25, 2010, at 12:19 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Hi Ruppert,
can at the moment only repeat what i said before...let us first finish
it we plan to finish it at the end of this month, more
Thanks Hans - and please just come with some information so that we, as a
group, can try to get this reconciled into one app again.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Do not worry we are still working on it. This week we will do some more
commits. We plan to have
Hi Hans,
Just checking if you have reached where you intend with this implementation.
I hope that you have been not put off from developing it further. I have
tried some of the features and think they can be very useful.
Thanks,
Rohit
--
View this message in context:
Do not worry we are still working on it. This week we will do some more
commits. We plan to have this finished the end of this month.
Regards,
Hans
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 08:42 -0800, rohit wrote:
Hi Hans,
Just checking if you have reached where you intend with this implementation.
I hope
I may be wrong, but some of the last commits make me think that Hans is trying
to reconcile some of the features into the new eBay component. At least this is
what I hope :-)
Jacopo
On Feb 6, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Hans, could you please comment on this ASAP? I see that
Let us first finish the new componentsometime this coming week
then we will have a look what to do next
regards,
Hans
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 07:44 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Hans, could you please comment on this ASAP? I see that additional commits
keep going into this new
A lot of assumptions in this email..
perhaps a question for you:
who wrote the help screens in the old ebay component?
please guide me to another place where this component is explained?
Regards
Hans
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 00:16 -0700, Scott Gray wrote:
On 4/02/2010, at 10:58 PM, Sam
Still not an excuse - how about an email before you are too far down the road
that began to ask about the current implementation and what you were planning
on doing? That alone would have likely done two things:
1. Forced the community to better document the current implementation.
2. Forced
Fellow committer is in direct response to being clear that it doesn't matter
who I'm talking to - Hans, Adam, Scott, David, etc. I'm not calling out a
person in particular - only calling out the committer who instead of giving us
an improved ebay component has decided to give everyone both a
If it has nothing to do with any person in particular, then there should be no
need to refer to a person, not even in a way that attempts to disguise the fact
that you are referring to a person like writing Fellow Committer. When you
use those words you ARE in fact talking about a person, and
On Feb 5, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
I hope that clarifies the stance and the use of the words fellow committer
- not trying to be condescending - just really trying to avoid the consistent
personal attack vibe around here since this has nothing to do with any
person in
Just trying to not be personal - there is no attack in any message that's been
sent. I was asked not to refer to people directly - so I have done that. I'll
resend the message removing these words as well so that hopeful we can stop
talking about feelings and can get directly to talking about
On Feb 5, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
My recommendation - even at this point - is that we start to have a
discussion about all of the things this new component does, and the people
who are using the old one can put all of their feature coverage on the table
- then we can discuss
Responding to this message - per Jacopo and David's request. Hopefully this
gets us back to discussing how we can go about fixing the ambiguity that has
been introduced and will push us to a consolidated front on these features:
---
My recommendation - even at this point - is that we start to
On Feb 5, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Just trying to not be personal - there is no attack in any message that's
been sent. I was asked not to refer to people directly - so I have done
that. I'll resend the message removing these words as well so that hopeful
we can stop talking
Ok, I arrived too late! :-)
Jacopo
On Feb 5, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Feb 5, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Just trying to not be personal - there is no attack in any message that's
been sent. I was asked not to refer to people directly - so I have done
Too late - at least then we can discuss it without the other baggage in the
thread. Anyways, the message is across so hopefully we can have that laid out
so we can let the feature comparison begin! Looking forward to getting this
resolved ASAP.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 5, 2010, at 7:29 AM,
I believe Tim has been touched by Heathenism (don't give names) but others
don't :D
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
Ok, I arrived too late! :-)
Jacopo
On Feb 5, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Feb 5, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
I think Dale Carnegie said criticize circumstances and compliment people.
David E Jones wrote:
If it has nothing to do with any person in particular, then there should be
no need to refer to a person, not even in a way that attempts to disguise the
fact that you are referring to a person
Haan,
I'm sorry to hear that, I guess if no one else feels strongly about this then
I'll bow out and allow you to continue with your duplication of existing code.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 3/02/2010, at 11:52 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Scoot,
i am sorry. As I
I will try to have a look today, in order to introduce a 3d party in this
discussion...
Jacques
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Haan,
I'm sorry to hear that, I guess if no one else feels strongly about this then
I'll bow out and allow you to continue with your
duplication of
How can introducing another EBay implementation because a fellow committer is
just too far down that road really ok for the rest of the project? Try
explaining it to anyone trying to use the system why this was done -
unfortunately we can't (don't know the original gap or what was solved by
Couple of things
1. calling one ebay and one ebaystore is confusing when browsing the
source tree - perhaps once we know what the difference is between them
call them that? If its correct - call one eBay-XML and the other
eBay-API for example.
2. eBay has a huge amount of developer documentation
Tim Ruppert wrote:
How can introducing another EBay implementation because a fellow committer is
just too far down that road really ok for the rest of the project? Try
explaining it to anyone trying to use the system why this was done -
unfortunately we can't (don't know the original gap
On 4/02/2010, at 10:58 PM, Sam Hamilton wrote:
Couple of things
1. calling one ebay and one ebaystore is confusing when browsing the
source tree - perhaps once we know what the difference is between them
call them that? If its correct - call one eBay-XML and the other
eBay-API for example.
Scott,
You see the number of messages here? You think like us that everybody
reads this? (Stupid us :-) )
i propose a work in progress wiki page and somebody who will push
publication on this list, just what Jacques does well on the what is
new list.
Actually the work in progress page could be
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
On 2/02/2010, at 11:43 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Jacopo,
what we need is a wiki page where people can announce activities and
plans. Not only from committers but also from contributors and perhaps
even users.
I have proposed this before.
Scott: That's
On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Jacopo,
what we need is a wiki page where people can announce activities and
plans. Not only from committers but also from contributors and perhaps
even users.
I have proposed this before.
I think we already have something similar:
Hi Hans,
Based on your recent commits I guess your considering this discussion over?
Regards
Scott
On 3/02/2010, at 1:01 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Jacopo,
what we need is a wiki page where people can announce activities and
plans. Not
Hi Scott,
I only wondering why you send this email, can you explain that to me?
Anyway, thanks for asking, i still think it is required. It showed with
the ebay component:
1. creators of the original component would have liked to discuss it.
2. a non committer had already developed a component
On 3/02/2010, at 11:04 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Hi Scott,
I only wondering why you send this email, can you explain that to me?
As I mentioned below, your commits indicated that you are continuing in your
current direction which is something I disagree with, I was hoping some
agreement could
Scoot,
i am sorry. As I mentioned in another email jacopo already saw that we
are too far down the road. I cannot change. Anybody with Ebay knowledge
would appreciate this contribution and replace the old ebay component
directly with the new one.
I am sorry i am very busy here and cannot spend
Okay so once I saw this I took the 5 minutes necessary to look at eBay's
services and start thinking that this commit is a bad idea.
Please correct me if any of the following is wrong:
- When you originally brought this up, you described the problem as one of XML
vs. API but I think what you
Hi Hans,
Don't get me wrong, if the SDK simplifies the integration then I am all for it.
I don't however think that your approach is a good one, IMO the most likely
outcome will be that your implementation will be substantially different from
what is currently available and because of that we
Hi Hans,
first of all, thank you for contributing this big amount of code.
On Feb 3, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Hi Scott,
I am also not sure if we need 2 components. That can only be decided by
the users of the original Ebay component isn't it? I do not know the
user
Jacopo,
what we need is a wiki page where people can announce activities and
plans. Not only from committers but also from contributors and perhaps
even users.
I have proposed this before.
In this case we tried to extend the existing ebay component but found
out that the xml interface could
On 2/02/2010, at 11:43 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Jacopo,
what we need is a wiki page where people can announce activities and
plans. Not only from committers but also from contributors and perhaps
even users.
I have proposed this before.
That's what we use the dev list for though right?
44 matches
Mail list logo
