On Jan 13, 2013, at 12:32 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
two questions about next release and dependencies:
1) David reworked our JavaEE descriptors parsing to use sxc. In this
refactoring we
On Jan 13, 2013, at 2:06 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2013, at 1:56 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2013, at 12:32 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu
On Dec 30, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Id like to break rest default config so 1.6 is better imo
Why don't we have a discussion about breaking the default config. Can you post
a proposal on it?
-David
Le 30 déc. 2012 21:34, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
You mentioned it breaks the config. Can you write up some before and after
examples of that?
Note, we've never ever broken config without still supporting the previous
version. We supported the OpenEJB 2.x config for years.
Part of the reason I was on the conservative side when we were
Sounds like we have a clear path for compatibility. If someone is configuring
endpoints, we do it the old way. If someone is configuring Applications, we do
it that way.
Question though on the new way. How does one configure an endpoint if no
application exists and they just have endpoints
Just a note that Unsafe definitely is portable. We investigated it when
Geronimo started using it (rather OpenEJB uses it for CMP and other things).
It's the one exception to the not portable rule and is considerably faster
than any alternative because it goes directly at memory addresses,
Heard back from the ASF Board. Our TLP name is now officially Apache TomEE :)
Will follow up with Infra to see if it's at all possible to get
us...@tomee.apache.org etc.
-David
Working on t1.micros in EC2 and noticing that the JAX-RS portion of deployment
(1.5.1) is taking an exceptionally long time.
Jan 3, 2013 4:28:52 AM org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener init
[...trimmed 2 minutes worth of logging...]
Jan 3, 2013 4:30:43 AM
Committed.
On Dec 28, 2012, at 7:19 AM, Anonymous CMS User anonym...@apache.org wrote:
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://openejb.apache.org/tomee-mp-getting-started.mdtext
Index:
Applied! Thank you so much, Gerhard!
I think I had a stale version of that page, so the CMS merged and warned me
that it merged then committed. Let me know if the page is missing something.
Thank you!
-David
On Dec 26, 2012, at 6:11 AM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote:
Clone
On Dec 20, 2012, at 5:28 AM, AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com wrote:
Did the trick. The build moves on to the next failure
Need to get that surefire thing hitched up.
Feel free to tinker with the Buildbot builder definition directly. All
committers have access:
Checkout:
On Dec 17, 2012, at 8:32 AM, AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com wrote:
There may be more of these lurking in the code. I know win platform does not
seem to be used much but we still need to check
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openejb-trunk-win-sunjdk/ every now and then.
Problem is that
Casting my vote and closing. Here's my +1.
-David
On Dec 13, 2012, at 7:40 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Discussion concluded some time ago on changing the name of the project to
Apache TomEE. The consensus is clear to move ahead with the name change and
in the weeks
Vote passes with 10 +1s, a +0.5 (not really an option, but we'll let it slide),
a +0 and no other options.
+1s:
Alan Cabrera
Andy Gumbrecht
Charles Moulliard
David Blevins
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Jonathan Gallimore
Karan Malhi
Mohammad Nour El-Din
Thiago Veronezi
Vishwanath Krishnamurthi
+0.5
How could I forget Daniel!
Vote passes with 11 +1s, a +0.5 (not really an option, but we'll let it slide),
a +0 and no other options.
+1s:
Alan Cabrera
Andy Gumbrecht
Charles Moulliard
Daniel Stefan Haischt
David Blevins
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Jonathan Gallimore
Karan Malhi
Mohammad Nour El-Din
Here's the preview link:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/openejb/?previewEntry=apache_tomee_1_5_1
Looks like my little script is slightly broken.
-David
On Dec 16, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
you need roller account, think only committer can get it
Try this URL:
http://blogs.apache.org/preview/openejb/?previewEntry=apache_tomee_1_5_1
I might add some links in there and maybe some highlights of the release notes.
-David
On Dec 16, 2012, at 1:47 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's the preview link:
https
Expanded it a bit with some summary details:
http://blogs.apache.org/preview/openejb/?previewEntry=apache_tomee_1_5_1
-David
On Dec 16, 2012, at 2:18 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Try this URL:
http://blogs.apache.org/preview/openejb/?previewEntry=apache_tomee_1_5_1
On Dec 14, 2012, at 12:34 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 on the renaming based on the discussion we had before
But about the purpose/responsibilities of the project won't that contradict
w/ Apache Geronimo ?
No. Apache doesn't have the concept of a project or
On Dec 14, 2012, at 11:00 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 14, 2012, at 12:34 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 on the renaming based on the discussion we had before
But about the purpose/responsibilities of the project won't
Didn't get much in the way of followup, going to assume the 15th is fine. If
not, speak up :) Will update our logo contest page tomorrow.
-David
On Dec 11, 2012, at 11:26 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 11, 2012, at 2:09 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@gmail.com wrote
Discussion concluded some time ago on changing the name of the project to
Apache TomEE. The consensus is clear to move ahead with the name change and in
the weeks since the discussion, no other views have been expressed, it's time
for an official vote.
To do this we need a resolution to:
On Dec 11, 2012, at 12:50 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
a quick word to share a little thought: was the fact to do the logo
contest on JIRA a good idea?
we have pretty bad stats now mainly because of it ;)
Who knows if it was good idea or not :) It seems to be
What do people think about extending the logo contest?
As these things go, no one participates until other people participate. Once
the ball gets rolling, though, it really rolls. Ours just started to roll in
the last two weeks. Now we're getting logo submissions on a pretty regular
basis.
of juanuary then we choose for beginning of february
wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2012/12/11 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com:
What
On Dec 10, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote:
Binaries Source:
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/staging-132/openejb-4.5.1/
Whoops. I just noticed the OpenEJB Standalone zip/tar are not in the binaries
directory. This is a bug in the release-tools I
On Dec 11, 2012, at 2:52 AM, AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com wrote:
If I have my way I would prefer a 'mutable' keyword, with the default being
'immutable' (final) ;-).
Man after my own heart :)
http://blog.dblevins.com/2011/04/final-is-my-favorit-java-keyword.html
An update to that
TCK looks good as well. My +1!
Such an excellent job Jean-Louis! This is a big milestone for the project.
Getting more people familiar with the release process is critical and you've
done a fantastic job at it. Thank you as well to Elisa and Luna for donating
their Jean-Louis time to us :)
Created us an Apache TomEE community on Google+ as it looks much nicer than a
simple Page. While I was filling out sections to encourage discussions, it
occurred to me that it's the perfect place to ask people to share I use TomEE
stories with us.
I posted to the user list already, but I
Haven't yet wired it in, but hacked all weekend on finally killing our JAXB
performance overhead. The Java EE descriptors change only every so many years
so it makes zero sense to pay 500ms to 1+s *per boot* on JAXB discovering and
processing our descriptor tree. We pay both reflection and
On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:33 AM, AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1964
[...]
What should the process actually be here. Is the real intention to overwrite
the 'colors' directory with the second deployment? This means the original
Awesome. Reviewing the LICENSE/NOTICE files will be easy :)
-David
On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
here the diff (size) between 1.5.0 and 1.5.1 (current) branch:
apache-tomee 1.5.1 webprofile
change: +0.22 MB
total : 27.13 MB
If you can file JIRAs for the Release notes that'd be awesome!
-David
On Dec 4, 2012, at 3:02 AM, andygumbre...@apache.org wrote:
Author: andygumbrecht
Date: Tue Dec 4 11:02:55 2012
New Revision: 1416880
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1416880view=rev
Log:
Fix - OpenEJB 'lib' is
Moving the discussion to the dev list. Seems there's some confusion on the
rules around java:app visibility.
From a purely specification and compliance perspective, the basic rule is that
java:app is visible to the entire application, universally. No exceptions
and no conditions. If it is
On Nov 22, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote:
The release notes preview is available here
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/releasenotes-1.5.1.html
Excellent to see it working! I always have problems getting it to run. Seems I
always have to patch something.
On Nov 19, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Afair the policy so far has been that all packages must be under the TLP
name. That was the reason why CODI also has org.apache.myfaces.extension.cdi
and not simply org.apache.codi. That was the main reason for proposing
, November 19, 2012, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
So all is fine?
What are we waiting for now?
Le 19 nov. 2012 22:39, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comjavascript:;
a écrit :
On Nov 19, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.dejavascript:;
wrote:
Afair the policy so far has been
FYI cabin doors (plane) are closing back online in the morning.
On Monday, November 19, 2012, David Blevins wrote:
At this point we draft up a board resolution to amend our TLP name and
description and vote on it. Then we wait till next board meeting till its
official.
The next board
Any more thoughts on this?
-David
On Nov 15, 2012, at 8:22 AM, stratwine tovishwan...@gmail.com wrote:
Jonathan Gallimore-2 wrote
I think renaming the TLP makes sense as TomEE is getting a lot of
attention
from the public now, and having it under OpenEJB has the potential to be a
little
Talk is in 3 hours :)
Can someone attach the paw print logo here?
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-575
-David
.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
To: dev@openejb.apache.org dev@openejb.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 4:04 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] TomEE as the TLP name
Since it came up in the other thread, good time
agree on something?
I do not like the actual logo (or no logo). The feather with TomEE on
top
is just aweful :)
Looks like we only have Romain's proposal.
How could we proceed?
Would be great to get it for the 1.5 release.
WDYT?
Jean-Louis
2012/6/19 David Blevins
Since it came up in the other thread, good time to officially raise the
discussion on how we want to identify ourselves as a TLP.
There have been concerns raised on how we identify to the public in terms of
our primary identity -- the website says TomEE in letters as big as my hand
was one
On Nov 13, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote:
But, that bring the question: should OPENEJB be renamed to TomEE as the TLP
at Apache?
Exactly. That's the ultimate subject I wanted to bring up, but wanted to give
Mohammad the chance to raise his concerns about
Won't get a chance to look at it, but there's a TCK failure wrt
@DataSourceDefinition. Here's the stacktrace. Will post the test info to
tck@openejb.a.o
SEVERE: Unable to register JDBC pool with JMX
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
This one hit me on stage last Tuesday -- I attempted to use a SNAPSHOT instead
of the released version.
Seems we changed something between the 1.5.0 and last Monday that breaks
undeployment causing failure on redeploy:
INFO: Started Ejb(deployment-id=HelloBean, ejb-name=HelloBean, container=My
Noticed the Intellij Blog post on TomEE support figured we should feature it.
Entry queued up for tomorrow to give at least a little time for review:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/openejb/?previewEntry=intellij_idea_12_eap_available
Note the bad formatting is the preview script -- needs
Looking for some insight as to what TOMEE-334 is meant to imply.
-David
https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2012/10/8 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Looking for some insight as to what
...@gmail.com
i globally agree even if i would have had it on the 12th.
- Romain
2012/6/4 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Jun 4, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Neale Rudd wrote:
If we get a higher vote for the pawprint sum(+1/-1) vs (waitFor40days)
we'll just go with it - pending David's
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2012/10/8 David Blevins david.blev
On Oct 8, 2012, at 1:31 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hi David,
I wrote the announcements and sent them to you but did not get any feedback.
WDYT about them? Should I re write new ones?
Any feedback would be appreciated.
For others, here is the first draft I wrote.
. Per Apache
by-laws votes need to have a '[VOTE]' header and run for a period of days and
close with a '[RESULT]'.
-David
2012/10/8 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
I think the fact that we're getting votes on a '[RESULTS]' thread is a
sign there was no actual vote :)
That said, it's
On Oct 8, 2012, at 11:27 AM, Neale Rudd wrote:
I'll put them on a URL within the next hour if you can send it quickly,
otherwise tomorrow. Someone else can count the votes over the next 72 hours.
If there is a too-close vote, maybe it's better to run a competition, or if
it's unanimous
- Original Message - From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
To: dev@openejb.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 5:55 AM
Subject: Re: 1.5 Clarification
On Oct 8, 2012, at 11:33 AM, Neale Rudd wrote:
- http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html shows 1.0.0, but
http
Ok, vote passes with 10 +1s and no other votes!
+1s
Jean-Louis Monteiro
David Blevins
Dain Sundstrom
Jeff Genender
Romain Manni-Bucau
Jonathan Gallimore
Alan Cabrera
Daniel Haischt
Thiago Veronezi
Karan Malhi
Will push all the binaries. Then we need to wait a bit for the mirrors to
sync. We
).
wdyt?
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau*
*Blog:
**http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
2012/9/28 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
TCK looks good. Builds fine. Works in Eclipse
TCK run from trunk post-change passed. A run from the staging-060 binaries is
in progress and looks good. Build looks good.
Here's my +1
-David
On Sep 28, 2012, at 4:40 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
Ignore. Forgot to update the options on the tool :) Use the 052 vote.
We can reroll.
Will merge and do that now.
-David
On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-433
and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-432
didnt put any version since i don't know if we re-roll the vote
*Romain
On Sep 27, 2012, at 11:09 AM, David Blevins wrote:
We can reroll.
Will merge and do that now.
-David
On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-433
and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-432
didnt put any version
TCK looks good. Builds fine. Works in Eclipse. Here's my +1!
-David
On Sep 27, 2012, at 12:46 PM, dblev...@apache.org wrote:
[generated email]
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/openejb-4.5.0/
Maven Repo:
Thanks, Jean-Louis!
Still looking, but at first glance the openejb-provisionning-4.5.0 zip seems to
be missing the LICENSE file.
-David
On Sep 25, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~jlmonteiro/staging-001/legal/archives.html
Jean-Louis
2012/9/24
On Sep 25, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
openejb-standalone 4.5.0
A jansi-1.8.jar [111.638 ko]
Missing the JANSI entry for the standalone NOTICE file, but other than that
everything looked good with TomEE WebProfile, TomEE Plus and OpenEJB Standalone.
Still need to look
Excellent. Added tests in and kicked off a build since no other of our builds
are running.
-David
On Sep 20, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
just added the builbot job for the release branch:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openejb-4.5.0
tests are skipped for the moment to
On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:45 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hello guys,
Was looking to release notes and all the work we did since last release
1.0.0.
I was wondering if we could jump to a 1.5.0?
IMHO, the gap between both is really big (large improvements, classloading
changes, ear
On Sep 19, 2012, at 12:46 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:45 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hello guys,
Was looking to release notes and all the work we did since last release
1.0.0.
I was wondering if we could jump to a 1.5.0?
IMHO, the gap between both is really
the JAX-RS distro and maybe 2 other highlights.
I'll send a note to Oracle and see what requirements we might have for adding a
certified distro with JAX-RS.
-David
2012/9/19 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Sep 19, 2012, at 12:46 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 19, 2012, at 8
Looks like this module has been failing in buildbot for a while. Tracking it
down
-David
See private tck@openejb list for details.
-David
-compiler
Rolled it back for now as it's just an example. It was also this holding up
the openejb-trunk-deploy for the last couple days. Hopefully JAX-RS comes up
green.
-David
2012/9/12 David Blevins david.blev
+ resources (then other tag
are not officially supported)?
Le 9 sept. 2012 20:53, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit :
A release would be excellent.
On Sep 8, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
We should try to push a rc asap (next week?)
Here what i want
A release would be excellent.
On Sep 8, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
We should try to push a rc asap (next week?)
Here what i want to hack on next week before a rc:
1) tomcat version update
Excellent
2) mail session property handling (kind of cosmetic)
3) little
First, nice fixes! I always love how incredibly specific your fixes are.
We should file some JIRAs for these. Maybe one for each line.
-David
On Sep 6, 2012, at 12:39 AM, andygumbre...@apache.org wrote:
Author: andygumbrecht
Date: Thu Sep 6 07:39:07 2012
New Revision: 1381492
URL:
On Aug 30, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Anthony Fryer wrote:
Are you guys thinking of providing an mbean interface to the java config api?
I used to work a fair bit on weblogic and they had configuration mbeans that
you could use to change the configuration. I think this is how they manage
clustered
On Aug 28, 2012, at 5:29 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
For java api, why not events like in cdi? We didnt mention it but we cant
do everything at every moment so i think good event could be a good
solution. An event could get a addResource method for instance
Definitely a callback mechanism
On Aug 26, 2012, at 11:06 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
I'm implementing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-731
I'm adding it to:
org.apache.openejb.config.rules.CheckPersistenceRefs
but I think I need the real PersistenceUnit, what is the best way to get it ?
The persistence-unit
On Aug 24, 2012, at 2:27 AM, Bjorn Danielsson wrote:
David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
[Please respond inline and don't top-post or the thread will be unreadable.
Just trim the email down to the parts that pertain to the response and
respond
below the part
On Aug 24, 2012, at 8:41 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
I would like to use this to have a place for the admin to write all the
config of the application, so I need only application scoped resources
Configuration
administratoraddress='**myaddress@mydomain'
/Configuration
class
On Aug 23, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
probably the ejbname usage is the issue, if the deployment is global the id
should be ;)
So your vote would be for using the deployment id?
AppContext
BeanContext id=fooApp/greenModule/CalculatorBean
/BeanContext
On Aug 23, 2012, at 3:22 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 23, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
probably the ejbname usage is the issue, if the deployment is global the id
should be ;)
So your vote would be for using the deployment id?
AppContext
BeanContext id
On Aug 23, 2012, at 3:37 PM, exabrial wrote:
A couple of things...
What about a typesafe Java Configuration descriptor? Would it be possible to
use both a compiled class and a .java file? I don't think either of these
have been tried on a ApplicationServer (yet!)
We actually have (close
If there is anyone looking for something to do, there is a ton of validation
work to be done.
Nearly all the validation code we have now is run on EJBs only, but much of it
applies universally.
Some of them that can and should be updated to check Servlets, ManagedBeans and
more:
-
So at some time a 2010 we split CoreDeploymentInfo[1] into three scoped
objects, BeanContext, ModuleContext and AppContext. Each of these contexts
objects has:
- a set of Properties so we can track options at each level
- a chained Options object to allow for property inheritance
- a typed
On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:56 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
4) create a codi arquillian test module
+1 to this option.
We knew we were only going to get away with one big module of tests for so long.
-David
Heads up on a long needed rewrite of the ServiceProvider service-jar.xml code.
We've been duplicating config for years and it's been a back-burner item on the
TODO list for quite some time.
Currently, the service-jar.xml configs, which provide defaults for anything
configured in tomee.xml,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to also present or co present with anybody interested in.
My favorite topic features oriented (cloud maybe): with ssh, provisioning,
cluster deployment, dynamic place holder, etc?
WDYT?
The point is that
It'd be great to see 3 or 4 submissions for TomEE and some of the more
interesting features we have. I'd love to attend a KarafEE talk! It'd be
great to have a general TomEE talk and then some talks specific to various
features.
I think it would be great to also have dual focused talks:
Flat would be nice. Agreed that layout is a little crufty.
-David
On Jul 25, 2012, at 12:08 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
we currently have some examples in a subfolder of examples directory - i
think of webapps
shouldn't we make it flat in our svn?
in fact there are 2 choices
Note that moving libraries out of the lib/ directory breaks most of the Tomcat
based tools like Eclipse WTP.
We could do it, but there'd be some sacrificing of our Tomcat nature involved.
-David
On Jul 25, 2012, at 6:27 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
Hi devs,
Was wondering if we could
Poking Dain, hoping he can give some feedback. Dain was the one who added the
JTA support to DBCP when we needed it. It was a pretty decent undertaking
then. I.e. didn't fit terribly well.
Redoing that in the Tomcat connection pooling might be possible. Anything that
uses the
On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:01 AM, andygumbre...@apache.org wrote:
Author: andygumbrecht
Date: Fri Jul 20 07:01:21 2012
New Revision: 1363668
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1363668view=rev
Log:
quartz 2.1.5
slf4j 1.6.6
log4j 1.2.17
If you can file JIRAs for the upgrades so we can
On Jul 17, 2012, at 6:52 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Ok, proposal?
FYI, no proposals required. Anyone is free to setup the build in any CI system.
Getting people to help maintain it is the hard part, which I think was Daniel's
point. Originally, Gavin did all the buildbot work for the
In efforts to help Jean-Louis with the JIRA cleaning and ensure his hard work
can bring as much value as possible, I expanded the capabilities of our CMS
usage so we can generate reports from JIRA
I went ahead and made a couple of them:
- http://tomee.apache.org/dev/jira/todo.html
-
On Jul 16, 2012, at 2:18 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
on jira we have several kind of task (bug, new feature...) and just noticed
we have new jira project? what does it mean?
The options that show up there are dictated by the 'Default Issue Type Scheme'
in JIRA which is shared by some
[moved back to dev as response contains no TCK confidential information]
On Jul 16, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
@David: does this task mean running tck locally?
Nope. Ensuring everything is green via any tools is good enough.
An easy step to do. Having it there listed as a
Among the largest tasks to be completed, are:
[TOMEE-302] Update LICENSE and NOTICE of changed binaries
[TOMEE-303] Create LICENSE and NOTICE for new binaries
These two typically tank most our releases. It's in this particular area where
it'd be great to see more volunteers.
For this
On Jul 14, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
I'd like to help
I tried to write some lines.
I think as an anonymous I could not update the site
Clicking the 'Submit' button with the 'Mail Diff' option checked does the
trick. Will send a notification to the dev list and we can
I've hacked up a new tool to create a task and several subtasks for all the
things that need doing when getting a release out.
Hopefully, this will achieve a few things:
- get more people involved in releases
- further document the steps involved in releases
- get releases out faster with
;
will be interesting to do some before/after gc log analyses on some
simple
apps via 'ab' generated loads.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
just wondered regarding j6 EOL
no feature
- Romain
2012/7/14 David Blevins david.blev
1 - 100 of 1653 matches
Mail list logo
