,
---rony
On 04.09.2011 18:56, Niklas Nebel wrote:
> In case anyone is still reading these lists:
>
> I have left Oracle and started a new job, not related to
> OpenOffice.org. Because of this, I won't have enough time for any
> meaningful participation in the "new" OpenO
(It is still possible to use the OOo support on Mac running the
standalone Rexx scripts via the command line, including the GUI
UNO_API_info tool.)
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask them.
---rony
--- cut here
Hi Ariel,
On 11.06.2011 20:26, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hello rony,
>
> On Saturday 11 June 2011, 12:43, rony wrote:
>
>> Hi Niklas,
>>
>> On 11.06.2011 17:36, Niklas Nebel wrote:
>>
>>> Dependencies on LGPL libraries may soon beco
On 11.06.2011 17:55, Niklas Nebel wrote:
> On 11.06.2011 17:43, rony wrote:
>> On 11.06.2011 17:36, Niklas Nebel wrote:
>>> Dependencies on LGPL libraries may soon become a problem.
>> What would be the problem here?
>>
>> [Just curious why it was o.k. in the
rhaps some tweaking of solver settings. But the patch
> shows that replacing lp_solve is clearly a (pardon the pun) solvable
> problem.
Sounds promising, nevertheless.
:)
---rony
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org
with Subject: help
nality. Whatever functionality the standard/reference package
possesses is what professionals should be able to rely on to be
available, if anyone else creates/distributes an OOo or LO package
(possibly with added functionality, leaving the base line, i.e.
standard/reference package, intact).
Regards,
---
On 07.06.2011 12:53, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:45:09PM +0200, rony wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information
>> has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation
>> seems to be (very unfor
,
---rony
On 06.06.2011 18:07, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:28:24 +0200
> rony wrote:
>
>> [... lots of hostile ranting ignored ...]
>> And by the way, if you wanted to be constructive, why did you not
>> supply a link to the place for reporting
Hi René,
On 07.06.2011 11:30, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:00AM +0200, rony wrote:
>
>> "unoinfo java" and interestingly "unoil.jar" is missing! Did a "locate
>> unoil.jar" after an "updatedb", but it is not i
installation
package has it), breaking the office.
BTW, René, where could one download your version of the deb package to
test it?
---rony
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org
with Subject: help
that they are not ignorants).
As for my application the workaround is simple: just install the genuine
OOo (or LO for that matter) and do not use the broken Ubuntu installation.
(Besides, the Ubuntu people broke the user interface with 11.04 bad
times, either taking
line does not work (using their unoinfo-output for Java) !
Instead one needs to deinstall LO, remove "~/.libreoffice" in home, get
the official LO distribution and install it, then things start to work
as was the case in the past with OOo.
Unbelievable !
---rony
P.S.: Maybe the Ubuntu
en?)
Any links that at least explain/clarify parts of these questions at this
point in time?
TIA,
---rony
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org
with Subject: help
Hi there,
should I open an issue for this? If so, whom should I assign it to?
---rony
On 10.04.2011 13:53, rony wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> testing all kind of combinations, the following behaviour can be observed:
>
> * case 1: starting OOo via the Application folder
>
>
On 11.04.2011 16:16, Joachim Lingner wrote:
> On 11.04.11 15:35, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> On 04/11/11 14:42, rony wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11.04.2011 13:16, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>>> On 04/11/11 12:24, rony wrote:
>>>>> What I would be after
On 11.04.2011 13:16, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/11/11 12:24, rony wrote:
>> What I would be after would be to get this information at installation
>> time without any user-interaction (most won't know what would be asked)
>> in a platform independent manner.
>&
Dear Stephan and Thomas,
thank you for your pointers!
On 11.04.2011 09:54, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/09/11 11:27, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> for an installation routine it is necessary to determine whether the
>> installed version of OOo is 32- or 64-bit, as this d
nctionality.
Is there anything I could do/try?
If not, should I file an issue (and if so, what level and whom to assign
to) ?
---rony
On 09.04.2011 23:02, rony wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> further debugging reveals, that indeed the error is in
>
> java.lang.System.loadLibrary(&q
oblem in OOo 3.3 for MacOSX in the context of
the scripting framework if doing a "Tools -> Macro -> Run"!
Is there anything I could (try) to do ?
TIA,
---rony
On 08.04.2011 17:29, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> currently debugging a scripting language added
versions then the request would be for all
platforms)? If so, what would be the correct means?
TIA
---rony
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org
with
if the OOo dispatch interface is attempting to loading the
scripting language it fails (and makes subsequent attempts to fail
as well),
* whereas if using the scripting framework editor to load a script
first thing and run it off the editor in the first OOo session,
then every
ll systems OOo is available) to stdout (Unicode string, multiple
paths are 0-delimited). "unoinfo" is located in the same folder where
soffice is stored and got introduced with OOo 3.0 AFAICR.
---rony
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi Alex,
On 16.02.2011 14:47, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 16/02/11 12:07, rony a écrit :
>
> Thanks for the links, will check them out. As it happens, the ports
> mechanism on Mac has oorexx so I have done installed it through the
> ports system.
>
Yes, but be aware that
On 16.02.2011 12:21, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 16/02/11 11:57, rony a écrit :
>
> Hi Rony,
>
>
>
>>> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92926
>>>
>>>
>> *UNBELIEVABLLE !!!*
>>
>> This is just unbeli
Hi Alex,
On 16.02.2011 10:46, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 15/02/11 21:49, Rony G. Flatscher a écrit :
>
>
> Hi Rony,
>
>> in the meantime it has become possible to install an oxt-package that
>> adds ooRexx as a new macro language to OOo on the MacOSX.
>>
Hi Christian,
On 15.02.2011 22:30, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi Rony, *,
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Rony G. Flatscher
> wrote:
>
>> in the meantime it has become possible to install an oxt-package that
>> adds ooRexx as a new macro la
he same oxt-package works unchanged
with the "Edit"-functionality on Windows and Linux.
Any ideas what could be the reason? Where would I find any logs on
MacOSX relating to such a problem (where is OOo logging errors to on
that platform)?
---rony
-
=$CLASSPATH:$UNO_PATH:$OOOJAVA/juh.jar:$OOOJAVA/jurt.jar:$OOOJAVA/ridl.jar
export
CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/basis-link/program/classes/unoil.jar
---rony
, then the cached context or the service
object are candidates for that to occur. However, on Windows and Linux
this does not happen as there are (global) references to these Java
objects which should inhibit any disposals.
TIA,
---rony
On 15.02.2011 16:27, rony wrote:
> On 15.02.2011 13:31, Ste
;
propValue="/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/program"
propValue="/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app"
propValue="/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/basis-link/program"
propValue="/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/basis-link"
On 15.02.2011 13:31, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 02/15/11 11:54, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> trying to figure out the setup needs for OOo 3.3 on MacOSX, if wishing
>> to use Java from the commandline to bootstrap and work with OOo 3.3.
>
> <http://wiki.services.openoffic
setup if one wishes to achieve that? Is
there a readme or wiki somewhere describing the necessary environment?
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
>>> well I don't dare to call myself that, so let's say I'm a community
>>> contributor.
>>>
>> What you do is truly great, btw. Thanks a lot Ariel.
>>
> +1
>
++1
---rony
-
Dear Stephan,
On 15.09.2010 11:51, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 09/15/10 08:12, rony wrote:
>> administra...@flatscher:~$ ls -alF
>> /home/administrator/.openoffice.org/> hadm-ooo.txt
>>
>> insgesamt 12
>> drwxr-xr-x 3 root
Hi Stephan,
On 14.09.2010 14:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 09/14/10 08:21, rony wrote:
>> The logfile (and a text-file giving information on the system) can be
>> found at:<http://wi.wu.ac.at/rgf/tmp/OOo/>.
>
> One odd thing in
> <http://wi.wu.ac.at/rg
ll make OOo available with
scripting on that particular machine (so it is more curiosity than
necessity to figure out what is happening on that Ubuntu-10.04-desktop
installation, which came without Java orginally).
Regards,
---rony
On 13.09.2010 17:47, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 09/13/10 15:
uninstalling all
Java may have left over some settings that are causing this phenomenon.)
---rony
On 06.09.2010 20:36, rony wrote:
> On 06.09.2010 16:47, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>
>> On 09/06/10 12:39, rony wrote:
>>
>>> On 06.09.2010 11:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>
esting!
Approximately when would you think this infrastructure will be available
(maybe the earliest estimation) ?
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
On 06.09.2010 16:47, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 09/06/10 12:39, rony wrote:
>> On 06.09.2010 11:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>> On 09/06/10 11:37, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>>>> After a fresh install of a German Ubuntu-desktop 10.4.1 and
>>>> starti
On 06.09.2010 11:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 09/06/10 11:37, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> After a fresh install of a German Ubuntu-desktop 10.4.1 and starting any
>> OOo module a popup error comes along informing one that OOo cannot
>> determine the user-interface lan
k into OOo and learns,
that it does not work) and how to remedy it?
TIA,
---rony
Hi René,
On 24.08.2010 10:38, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> rony, OK please try
>
> $ cd /usr/lib/ure/share/java
> $ ln -f ../../../../share/java/openoffice/jurt.jar jurt.jar
>
Yup, that makes it work !
---rony
--
Retrying...
On 24.08.2010 11:54, rony wrote:
> Hi René,
>
> On 24.08.2010 10:38, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
>> rony, OK please try
>>
>> $ cd /usr/lib/ure/share/java
>> $ ln -f ../../../../share/java/openoffice/jurt.jar jurt.jar
>>
>&
ere is at least a problem in the Ubuntu distribution with the setup
somewhere.
Regards,
---rony
On 23.08.2010 11:42, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 21/08/2010 23:57, rony wrote:
>
>> Hi René,
>>
>> sorry that it took a while to get back, but I got totally carried away
That's how the three-layewr
> OOo interface was defined.
>
What would be the easiest way to re-install the Ubuntu-OOo after
deinstalling the genuine OOo?
(Or do I have to go through Synaptic manager and check all sort of
modules (with the risk that I am overlooking
Hi René,
On 23.08.2010 16:05, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
>> for installing an extension (under Ubuntu in this particular case) in an
>> installation script the command-line tool "unopkg" is used. Whe
not closing OOo
> explicitly leavees an instance open.)
>
>
sorry for the noise, just found what I need: XDesktop.terminate().
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional co
behaviour?
Is there a command-line utility which one could use to make sure that
after unopkg OOo gets reliably shutdown? Or with other words: how could
one make sure in an un/installation script, that OOo has completely shut
down after unopkg, before proceeding
sr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/classes/unoil.jar:/usr/lib/openoffice/progra
The genuine OOo will have practically the same setting, except that its
directory would be pointed to:
"/opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/share/java/*".
HTH,
---rony
On
Hi René,
On 17.08.2010 21:05, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:49:24PM +0200, rony wrote:
>
>> (Due to a package that excercises the Java-UNO-bridge I have stumbled
>> over Ubuntu's distro which seems to be broken in that area and read
>>
>
Björn,
On 16.08.2010 16:56, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
> Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:12:50 +0200
> schrieb "Rony G. Flatscher" :
>
>
>> Maybe a last question: which Linux distributions are known to be 100%
>> compatible in their Java interfaces to OOo with th
he
> rpm-packages are all the same. ;)
>
Good to know!Maybe a last question: which Linux distributions are known
to be 100%
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
): where could one find/locate the appropriate "install"
script?
* does the genuine OOo install into /opt on Fedora or SuSE as well?
Maybe a last question: which Linux distributions are known to be 100%
compatible in their Java interfaces to OOo with the genuine OOo ?
TIA,
---rony
Buenos diaz Ariel,
On 08.08.2010 05:46, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hello Rony,
>
> On Saturday 07 August 2010, 12:21, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
>> It seems that the element in a "description.xml"
>> file can refer to multiple files that each are author
lace where one could explicitly determine
which codepage got used to create that text? If so, where and how could
that be done?)
---rony
.xml file such that it
works (and it works great and as intended!).
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
http://installation.openoffice.org/description";>
org.oorexx.uno.ScriptProviderForooRexx.package
5.00
http://wi.wu-wien.ac.at/rgf/rexx/bsf4oorexx/current/ooRexx4OOo_update.html";
/>
Is there something I am doing wrong here?
TIA,
---rony
P.S.: The specificatio
rgf/diplomarbeiten/index.htm#sem_201007a>.
---rony
y have been so
obvious for you and everyone else who has created Java based extensions,
but was new for me! Just applied it and it now works like a charm!
Again, kudos to you and Oliver!
---rony
P.S.: Now, in hindsight (after your expl
) adds the easy to
learn,
yet powerful scripting language "Open Object Rexx (ooRexx)".
As a result it becomes possible to add and deploy macros programmed
in ooRexx from within OOo.
ooRexx:http://www.ooRexx.org
BSF4ooRexx: http://wi.wu.ac.at/rgf/rexx/bsf4oorexx/current/
bundled Packages: {
}
Greatful for any further hints/suggestions!
---rony
merwork, or am I missing something obvious ?
[P.S.: Just renaming the extension back to '.jar' makes everything work
again, but I loose the "description.xml" stuff, which is a little bit
unfortunate.]
TIA,
---rony
Hi Stephan,
On 16.07.2010 14:51, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 07/16/10 13:48, rony wrote:
>> On 16.07.2010 08:48, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>> On 07/15/10 22:10, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>>>> today I stumbled over the following interesting (read: time-consuming)
&g
Hi Stephan,
On 16.07.2010 08:48, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 07/15/10 22:10, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> today I stumbled over the following interesting (read: time-consuming)
>> problem: while caching Java objects representing individual UNO_ENUM
>> va
objects representing individual UNO_ENUM
values really unsafe, i.e. the UNO side may garbage collect them?
(This seems to happen even if the Java class object representing the
UNO_ENUM gets cached!)
---rony
w.r.t. its output (cannot be
redirected, nor piped). And as such whether it warrants a bug report.
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
as a result of running
unopkg list --shared. The grep I am using on Windows is: GNU grep 2.5.3.)
Actually, the following does not work either under Windows:
unopkg list --shared > test.txt
"test.txt" would be a 0-byte file.
A
d for
installing the OOo SDK.)
TIA,
---rony
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 03/11/09 15:12, rony wrote:
>> [Yes, I wholeheartedly agree, that the current situation is many
>> times frustrating, especially for beginners in an area of OOo (even
>> experts of one or two modules are beginners if turning to new
>>
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 03/11/09 15:12, rony wrote:
>> [Yes, I wholeheartedly agree, that the current situation is many
>> times frustrating, especially for beginners in an area of OOo (even
>> experts of one or two modules are beginners if turning to new
>>
e is a lot of resources that is being
wasted just to figure out what the original cause of an exception was,
if possible at all.]
---rony
don't want to use it? If the examples are available only as NB
> projects, chances are high, that I will not only get frustrated, but that I
> will loose interest.
>
+1
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
9=Object, 11=Boolean)
isMissing(arg1)=False, value=someObject, datatype=9
isMissing(arg2)=False, value=True, datatype=11
isMissing(arg3)=True], State=[1]
Successful run.
-- cut here --
As you can see, the Basic function gets TWO arguments, instead of only
one. The last arg
) works!
Can someone shed some light on interdependencies between OOo Basic and
invoked non-OOo-Basic code via Java that bootstraps independently to OOo
in order to get a xContext?
TIA,
---rony
P.S.: Here's the OOo Basic code-snippet to invoke the ooRexx script via
dispatch:
-
Hi there,
not sure whether "dev@openoffice.org" would be the "better" list for
this question, hence cc:'ing it, but reply-to is set to point to
"d...@api.openoffice.org". Please advise, if another e-mail-list would be
better.
rony wrote:
>
gt;
> elseif fprops(p).Name = "Type" then
> type_registration = fprops(p).Value
> ... use type_registration ( which is an internal type name)
> ... to retrieve it's property "Extensions" and print it out
> endif
>
> you should be abl
much!
> Note: The script generates a simple HTML page - no content
> directly use able as Wiki content. But feel free to change
> the script so it exports the list using the right format .-)
Is there a way to also get the file-type pattern
links to the relevant OOo online documentation are
helpful for your research and experiments, in order to solve your
problem. Your findings could be valuable for other readers of this list,
hence the request to report back your findings/advice.]
---rony
--
*quite* some efforts to create it, but it works on all
platforms: Linux, Macs, and Windows), which may help you as well in your
efforts.
---rony
P.S.: Of course I am always interested in seeing the Smalltalk snippets
from time to time to relate to another posting of yours...
t; and as
such possesses the "XRefreshableInterface", which you then would neet to
query explicitly from the XEnumerationAcess object.
HTH,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ml>).
ooRexx itself is written in C++, the BSF4Rexx package enables ooRexx to
camouflage Java as ooRexx (bridging ooRexx and Java in both directions).
The ooRexx interaction with OOo uses the OOo Java bridge, hence the
packaging of the OOo support with BSF4Rexx.
---rony
Original Message
Set" interface was queried already (i.e.
whether its methods would be available already, or whether one needs to
query that interface). However, this may be interesting in other
contexts, where a service object is returned and it may be interesting
to know which interfaces got queried for already.
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
face_name...]".
Now the question: how can one get at exactly that piece of information
via Java at runtime?
E:\rony\dev\bsf\src\bin>rexxtry
REXX-ooRexx_3.2.0(MT) 6.02 16 Jun 2008
rexxtry.rex lets you interactively try REXX statements.
Each string is executed when you
re be problems foreseen with such an
approach ?
The invoking Java thread (the thread on which the script provider
runs/got invoked) would wait() upon termination of the script executing
on a separate Java thread, before proceeding.
TIA,
--
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi Rony,
I did start the discussions regarding Java version, OpenJDK, baseline
etc. on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for not announcing it here. Reason for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is, that all stakeholders from the last agreement
ribe to it)!
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!
Is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" an OOo mailing list that one should subscribe to to learn
as early as possible about Java related changes (configuration, class
loader schemes,etc.)?
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
ox 3.0.
However, FF was not able to find a newer version of the menu extension,
when it automatically checked for one! Maybe one needs to change further
version information in the rdf- and installation js-files as well?
Anyway, being a very h
Hi there,
after upgrading to FireFox 3.0 the OpenOffice.org menu extension is "Not
compatible with Firefox 3.0" and therefore disabled.
Are there any plans to update this little (and from time to time very
helpful) add-on?
Hi there,
just noticed that running DEV300/m23 with Java 1.4 does not work anymore:
- cut here -
E:\rony\dev\bsf\src\bin>testOOo.rex
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
com/sun/star/comp/helper/Bootstrap (Unsupported major.
ripts from any of the OOo supported
scripting languages.
TIA,
---rony
m (acronym) should I try to assign
such an issue?
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
any OOo
distribution. This just would reflect the reality of the environments
under which OOo has been running already and on which Java has been
deployed already independent of OOo!
Just my 2 cents...
---rony
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> On Nov 11, 2007 3:54 AM, jonathon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Rony wrote:
>>
>>
>>> FWIW: MS Word has been having that ability for quite a few versions now.
>>> There one would use the &quo
that ability for quite a few versions now.
There one would use the "Language" tab on styles to define what language
it is used for (on that dialog one is able to turn off grammar- and
spell-checking). Having that feature available it gets used around here
whenever there are mixed-language texts.
---rony
Well I tried it out on Windows too and I could install and de-install
it, using the "Software" option in the System folder. However, some
associations (I think ODT or ODS) did not get restored correctly.
Start-up times are abmysal in this beta drop, no
eiten/Seminararbeiten/2007/200701_Boehm/20070123_BoehmPatricia_FOSS.pdf>.
Also <http://www.opensource.org/> is a good place for researching all
sort of OSS licenses (on the left column), [L]GPL's home would be at
<http://www.gnu.org/>.
HTH,
---rony
Juergen Schmidt wrote:
> Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> Hi Jürgen,
>>
>> did submit the issue and set it to P1 (highest priority), as maybe other
>> third party Java based components/extensions may be affected by this
>> too.
>> (Though P1 might have been t
Hi Jürgen,
did submit the issue and set it to P1 (highest priority), as maybe other
third party Java based components/extensions may be affected by this too.
(Though P1 might have been to high.)
Here's the URL: <http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81445>.
Regard
s again for your quick answers!
---rony
P.S.: Of course all OOo jars would be needed in addition that reside in
the "classes" directory.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tion, but I have not stumbled over that
yet, or my memory fades already... ;) )
> you should submit an issue for that problem.
Should I assign it to someone already?
Thanks!
---rony
P.S.: As a sidenote: it would be possible with the help of Apache's
upcoming BSF 3.0 (in beta at the mome
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
