On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 02:14:07 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Shit, it's a good thing I don't have heart disease: Writing this message
probably would have done me in. I feel like Lewis Black, but without the
funny.
No, it was pretty funny :D
-Steve
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.wfd7p6fxeav7ka@steves-laptop...
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 16:30:07 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
> wrote:
>
>> Ouch. I haven't had virus problems on my XP system (knock on wood...),
>> but
>> my sister's had a lot of virus trouble on her Win7 machine (and g
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 16:30:07 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Ouch. I haven't had virus problems on my XP system (knock on wood...),
but
my sister's had a lot of virus trouble on her Win7 machine (and guess who
had to fix the fucking thing every time...) Of course, my dad had a lot
of
virus
Am 03.06.2012 00:37, schrieb Zardoz:
On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 11:56:36 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Make up your fucking mind, MS.
It's called Marketing and Sales department.
Every company that sells commercial products needs to keep adding the
"next big thing" to their product as a means to sel
On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 11:56:36 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Make up your fucking mind, MS.
It's called Marketing and Sales department.
Every company that sells commercial products needs to keep
adding the "next big thing" to their product as a means to sell
the product to existing users.
L
"Roman Ivanov" wrote in message
news:jqbnii$pgs$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 5/24/2012 4:45 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Mirko Pilger" wrote in message
>> news:jpl36q$sta$1...@digitalmars.com...
And Vista doesn't pop-up tons of shit everytime the pointer gets near
the
bottom of
On Friday, 25 May 2012 at 22:30:30 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Well, realistically 128MB for XP, and even that was back around
2000 or so.
I'm not really sure what the heck exactly happened (Just web
sites? Or
something more?), but these days, even on XP, 1GB is really
bare minimum.
That's se
On 5/24/2012 4:45 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Mirko Pilger" wrote in message
> news:jpl36q$sta$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>> And Vista doesn't pop-up tons of shit everytime the pointer gets near the
>>> bottom of the screen. I'd never be able to get any work done if I had
>>> (barely-distinguisha
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.wevud50reav7ka@steves-laptop...
>
>>> These are misleading statistics:
>>>
>>> 1. Most PCs that were built for XP *cannot* be upgraded to Win7. People
>>> are *very* unlikely to throw away perfectly working equipment just so
>>> they
>>> can upgra
On 25/05/2012 20:06, Walter Bright wrote:
I use putty every day, it is indispensible. But it doesn't work in the
other direction - I cannot ssh from Linux into Windows.
I've set up an ssh server with bash/unix utilities on Windows before
now. It was a massive hassle to do, but the end result w
On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:45:43 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
To be fair, I don't have a problem with the "search all programs"
feature. I
*do* have a problem with it being used as an excuse for not allowing me
to
have my All Programs menu operate in the way that works well for me.
And I k
"Gour" wrote in message
news:jpoc5j$1lvh$1...@digitalmars.com...
On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:42:09 -0400
>
> Here is something to make you a day. ;)
>
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/05/no-cost-desktop-software-development-is-dead-on-windows-8/
>
> &
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/pr
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.wevd5ooieav7ka@steves-laptop...
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:42:09 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
> wrote:
>
>>
>> *shrug* I find the thumbnail popups vastly inferior. Actually, I find it
>> useful literally 0% of the time, and both annoying and distracting 1
"David Nadlinger" wrote in message
news:kafgmioabokjwkfwm...@forum.dlang.org...
> On Friday, 25 May 2012 at 14:42:52 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> Just because some people like it doesn't mean it was a sensible move to
>> force it on *everyone*.
>
> Just because a few people don't »like it« doe
On May 25, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 5/24/2012 11:01 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> PuTTY's pretty good once you get over the initial intimidation and (small)
>> learning curve. But I agree, all that shit should be "in the box" already,
>> plus grep, curl, tee and maybe some oth
On 5/24/2012 11:01 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
PuTTY's pretty good once you get over the initial intimidation and (small)
learning curve. But I agree, all that shit should be "in the box" already,
plus grep, curl, tee and maybe some others (Fuck, toss in bash, too). And a
windows sshfs, packed-in,
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:06:14 +0100, Brad Anderson wrote:
>
>> I actually love AeroSnap. Not for that maximization feature but for what
>> it does when you drag to the left and right sides of the screen. It makes
>> working between two locat
On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:42:09 -0400
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote:
> ??? Of *course* most Win7 users like Win7 better, the ones who don't
> are XP users. Likewise, I can confidently say that a high majority of
> users for XP like the old interface better than Win7. So I don't see
> what that really mean
On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:42:09 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.wevablddeav7ka@steves-laptop...
I find this feature is *vastly* superior to the old "group all buttons
together into one taskbar button, then pop a list of the titles"
mechanism.
On Friday, 25 May 2012 at 14:42:52 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Just because some people like it doesn't mean it was a sensible
move to force it on *everyone*.
Just because a few people don't »like it« doesn't mean it
wasn't a good move as everyone else now benefits from it.
All they have to
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.wevablddeav7ka@steves-laptop...
>
>I find this feature is *vastly* superior to the old "group all buttons
>together into one taskbar button, then pop a list of the titles" mechanism.
>
*shrug* I find the thumbnail popups vastly inferior. Actually,
On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:30:03 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
"David Nadlinger" wrote in message
news:fvvzmqelefzdwdsoo...@forum.dlang.org...
On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 21:10:44 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
at least the taskbar is a user preference (a
On 25.05.2012 13:12, Regan Heath wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:06:14 +0100, Brad Anderson wrote:
I find the new Win7 to be much too clever. For example, if you move a
window up
against the top edge of the screen, it switches to full screen. Aggh. I
know why that was done, but it's just tailfins
On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:06:14 +0100, Brad Anderson wrote:
I find the new Win7 to be much too clever. For example, if you move a
window up
against the top edge of the screen, it switches to full screen. Aggh. I
know why that was done, but it's just tailfins and taillights in the
shape
of jet en
On 2012-05-25 07:30, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
It's all just, "You're *going* to like our objectively superior design, or
you can just fuck off." Ie, they've adopted Apple's (and Mozilla's) #1 core
value. No, fuck *you*, Win7/Vista.
So much anger inside one person :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:jpmhit$180q$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 5/24/2012 1:16 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
>> It's because the concept of "share this" is too damn simple. (and bogus).
>> Any
>> real network sharing requires users, ACL and so and so forth.
>>
>> To be frank I alway
"Sean Kelly" wrote in message
news:mailman.1061.1337904113.24740.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>On May 24, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>> On 5/24/2012 2:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> You sir, have inspired me :) I started writing a reply, but it ended up
>>> being this:
>>>
>>>
"David Nadlinger" wrote in message
news:fvvzmqelefzdwdsoo...@forum.dlang.org...
> On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 21:10:44 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
>>> at least the taskbar is a user preference (and I'm pretty sure you can
>>> revert that),
>>
>> It isn
No it doesn't. The "skin" is like XP, but all the behavior is still the same
Win7 stuff. It's still Windows Dock, just with more grey and straight edges.
i seem to miss something crucial here. i have a win xp and win 7 machine
in front of me this very moment. the quicklaunch buttons on the win
On May 24, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> I've tried various downloads that are bad ports of Unix tools to do things
> like tar, rsync, etc. One common disaster with them is they fail on large
> files - apparently some internal wrap-around. Miserable.
The GnuWin32 project is pretty so
On May 24, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 5/24/2012 2:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> You sir, have inspired me :) I started writing a reply, but it ended up
>> being this:
>>
>> https://www.semitwist.com/articles/article/view/steve-jobs-was-not-a-good-designer
>
> :-)
>
> My main
I've tried various downloads that are bad ports of Unix tools to do things like
tar, rsync, etc. One common disaster with them is they fail on large files -
apparently some internal wrap-around. Miserable.
On 5/24/2012 3:46 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Yes, even FTP can't beat straightforward "crack open this box and pull hdd out".
I've been using it for years and haven't had any problem with it ;)
One thing that does work great on Windows is being able to hot plug any old
random drive into a USB
On 5/24/2012 5:54 AM, simendsjo wrote:
Yes, XP mode is a virtualized xp, but running 16-bit virtualized applications in
a virtualized xp mode on win7 just doesn't work like it should :)
Good to see we're not the only one with this problem.
I would have been happy if MS had simply provided a sof
On 5/24/2012 1:16 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
It's because the concept of "share this" is too damn simple. (and bogus). Any
real network sharing requires users, ACL and so and so forth.
To be frank I always preferred running FTP or SSH server on Windows. Or even
Apache ;)
(though remote desktop
On 5/24/2012 2:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
You sir, have inspired me :) I started writing a reply, but it ended up
being this:
https://www.semitwist.com/articles/article/view/steve-jobs-was-not-a-good-designer
:-)
My main complaint with the touch interface is my touches often frustratingl
On 5/24/2012 12:23 AM, simendsjo wrote:
What 16-bit applications are you using? Are you still supporting 16-bit on your
C compiler?
Yup. I see no reason to break that.
On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 21:10:44 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
at least the taskbar is a user preference (and I'm pretty sure
you can revert that),
It isn't, and you can't.
I've checked all over, internet search, etc. If you're on Win7,
you have the
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.wetb8lg2eav7ka@steves-laptop...
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:29:25 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
> wrote:
>
>> "Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
>> news:op.wer3hmsreav7ka@steves-laptop...
>
>>> Although I would replace Vista in your narrative with Win
"Mirko Pilger" wrote in message
news:jpl36q$sta$1...@digitalmars.com...
>> And Vista doesn't pop-up tons of shit everytime the pointer gets near the
>> bottom of the screen. I'd never be able to get any work done if I had
>> (barely-distinguishable) mini-screenshots constantly popping up to "help
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
> On 5/23/2012 1:23 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>
>> On May 23, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Walter
>> Bright
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 3. erratic issues with sharing directories. Sharing was simple with XP -
>>> one click to share, another to unshare. Win7 ha
On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:45:50 +0200, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 03:23:24 -0400, simendsjo
wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 00:03:59 +0200, Walter Bright
wrote:
I checked that, but there was some other issue with that that made it
useless.
Yeah, running 16-bit in win7
On Thu, 24 May 2012 03:23:24 -0400, simendsjo wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 00:03:59 +0200, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 5/23/2012 2:57 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:29:36 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:04:30 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 06:29:25 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.wer3hmsreav7ka@steves-laptop...
Although I would replace Vista in your narrative with Win7. Vista was a
horrible abortion that should never have seen the light of day.
Maybe so,
We don't want Like buttons and similar. That's why we use newsgroups,
mailing lists and so on. That similes are displayed as images (in
Thunderbird at least) is almost too much. :)
i've never seen smilies in mails or ng posts using thunderbird. dunno. i
guess i turned it off ages ago.
On 24.05.2012 13:58, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
- There's a Vista laptop I sometimes borrow usage of. When transferring
files with my XP machine, I used to use Win file sharing (always seemed to
be good enough on XP<-->XP setups). It worked fine for awhile, and then one
day without warning it just..
And Vista doesn't pop-up tons of shit everytime the pointer gets near the
bottom of the screen. I'd never be able to get any work done if I had
(barely-distinguishable) mini-screenshots constantly popping up to "help" me
all time like Win7 loves to do.
just turn aero off. the win 7 desktop then
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.wer3hmsreav7ka@steves-laptop...
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 06:54:23 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
> wrote:
>>
>> Oh, so it's that time of the week again already? Time for MS to change
>> their
>> minds once again on which is cool and uncool: straight vs curv
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jpkvqi$153n$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> We don't want Like buttons and similar. That's why we use newsgroups,
> mailing lists and so on. That similes are displayed as images (in
> Thunderbird at least) is almost too much. :)
>
It may sound petty, and mayb
"Dmitry Olshansky" wrote in message
news:jpkqol$rmt$1...@digitalmars.com...
>> 3. erratic issues with sharing directories. Sharing was simple with XP -
>> one click to share, another to unshare. Win7 has a maze of dialog boxes
>> and alternate ways of doing it, some work, some don't, and no feedb
On 2012-05-24 09:56, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 07:13:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-24 08:48, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
If the app is designed correctly, it won't involve a browser in the
first
place.
So true, so true.
Where is the Like button? :)
We don't wa
On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 09:30:06 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Paulo Pinto" wrote in message
news:tvtwsxghjzkkuczrb...@forum.dlang.org...
On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 07:13:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-24 08:48, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
If the app is designed correctly, it won't i
"Paulo Pinto" wrote in message
news:tvtwsxghjzkkuczrb...@forum.dlang.org...
> On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 07:13:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2012-05-24 08:48, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>>> If the app is designed correctly, it won't involve a browser in the
>>> first
>>> place.
>>
>> So tr
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:jpjmkb$1mm6$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> I find the new Win7 to be much too clever.
I think that's a very good way of putting it.
> For example, if you move a window up
> against the top edge of the screen, it switches to full screen. Aggh. I
> know why tha
On 24.05.2012 0:04, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/22/2012 9:13 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Macs computers are the first laptops reliable enough to be handled as
an appliance - e.g. the sleep mode works well enough that I can
casually lift
the laptop off the couch while watching TV, open it, googl
On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 07:13:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-24 08:48, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
If the app is designed correctly, it won't involve a browser
in the first
place.
So true, so true.
Where is the Like button? :)
On Thu, 24 May 2012 00:03:59 +0200, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 5/23/2012 2:57 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:29:36 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:04:30 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
Win7 has enough problems that I'm forced to keep my old
On 2012-05-24 08:48, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
If the app is designed correctly, it won't involve a browser in the first
place.
So true, so true.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
"Sean Kelly" wrote in message
news:mailman.1031.1337823511.24740.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>On May 23, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Walter Bright
>wrote:
>> On 5/22/2012 2:55 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> I'm sure Google Docs is fast(-ish) on that 64-bit multi-core 8GB RAM,
>>> SSD
>>> storage mach
On May 23, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 5/22/2012 2:55 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> I'm sure Google Docs is fast(-ish) on that 64-bit multi-core 8GB RAM, SSD
>> storage machine, but when it takes that kind of hardware just to run a
>> what's really just a basic word processor, you
On 5/22/2012 2:55 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I'm sure Google Docs is fast(-ish) on that 64-bit multi-core 8GB RAM, SSD
storage machine, but when it takes that kind of hardware just to run a
what's really just a basic word processor, you know something has gone
horribly, horibly wrong.
Heh, no w
On 5/23/2012 2:57 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:29:36 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:04:30 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
Win7 has enough problems that I'm forced to keep my old WinXP machine operating:
1. can't run 16 bit programs
Really,
On 5/23/2012 1:23 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On May 23, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
3. erratic issues with sharing directories. Sharing was simple with XP -
one click to share, another to unshare. Win7 has a maze of dialog boxes and
alternate ways of doing it, some work, some don't, and n
On 5/23/2012 1:04 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/22/2012 9:13 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Macs computers are the first laptops reliable enough to be handled as
an appliance - e.g. the sleep mode works well enough that I can casually lift
the laptop off the couch while watching TV, open it, goo
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:29:36 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:04:30 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
Win7 has enough problems that I'm forced to keep my old WinXP machine
operating:
1. can't run 16 bit programs
Really, have no sympathy there :)
BTW, you should
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> On May 23, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Walter Bright
> wrote:
> >
> > 3. erratic issues with sharing directories. Sharing was simple with XP -
> one click to share, another to unshare. Win7 has a maze of dialog boxes and
> alternate ways of doing it, so
On Tue, 22 May 2012 06:54:23 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Oh, so it's that time of the week again already? Time for MS to change
their
minds once again on which is cool and uncool: straight vs curved?
Egads, it's like they're spinning their wheels just for the sake of
spinning
them. I'v
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:04:30 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
Win7 has enough problems that I'm forced to keep my old WinXP machine
operating:
1. can't run 16 bit programs
Really, have no sympathy there :)
-Steve
On May 23, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> 3. erratic issues with sharing directories. Sharing was simple with XP - one
> click to share, another to unshare. Win7 has a maze of dialog boxes and
> alternate ways of doing it, some work, some don't, and no feedback on whether
> it work
On 5/22/2012 9:13 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Macs computers are the first laptops reliable enough to be handled as
an appliance - e.g. the sleep mode works well enough that I can casually lift
the laptop off the couch while watching TV, open it, google for something, and
close it, all within
On 2012-05-22 21:52, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jpg2tq$140c$1...@digitalmars.com...
The Apple mouses has always been a joke. I started with Mac OS X on a
laptop, if you then mostly use the track pad it's not as bad. When I made
the full move to Mac OS X I con
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 05:55:45PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
[...]
> > Well I guess there's such a thing as different strokes for different
> > folks, de gustibus non disputandum, etc. etc.
> >
>
> No kidding! I was reading through that interview you
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:jpgrfp$2il8$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 5/22/12 2:52 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
>> news:jpg2tq$140c$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>>
>>> The Apple mouses has always been a joke. I started with Mac OS X on a
>>> laptop,
On 5/22/12 2:52 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jpg2tq$140c$1...@digitalmars.com...
The Apple mouses has always been a joke. I started with Mac OS X on a
laptop, if you then mostly use the track pad it's not as bad. When I made
the full move to Mac OS X I cont
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jpg2tq$140c$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> The Apple mouses has always been a joke. I started with Mac OS X on a
> laptop, if you then mostly use the track pad it's not as bad. When I made
> the full move to Mac OS X I continued to use my logitech mouse.
>
A
On 5/22/12 4:18 AM, Ary Manzana wrote:
I feel like OSX (and Mac's hardware) got almost everything right. It
makes you more productive, even if you are a developer.
Same here. Macs computers are the first laptops reliable enough to be
handled as an appliance - e.g. the sleep mode works well eno
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 01:56:35PM +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[...]
> It's called Marketing and Sales department.
>
> Every company that sells commercial products needs to keep adding the
> "next big thing" to their product as a means to sell the product to
> existing users.
>
> Let's take Office
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 08:02:49AM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Paulo Pinto" wrote in message
> news:joeuhviunrputogms...@forum.dlang.org...
> >
> > It's called Marketing and Sales department.
> >
> > Every company that sells commercial products needs to keep adding the
> > "next big thing"
On 2012-05-22 14:00, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Mostly 10.2. And then people told me "You have to upgrade to 10.3! It's sooo
much better!" Me: "Yea, you said the same about 10.2, asshole. When I made
the mistake of believing you that time, I blew $100 just to add (remove?)
stripes from the dock's ba
"Ary Manzana" wrote in message
news:jpfll9$a1h$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 5/22/12 3:41 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2012-05-22 09:50, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>>> See, that must be the problem, I only like crazy insane stuff ;)
>>>
>>> I actually did spend about a year using an OSX machine
"Paulo Pinto" wrote in message
news:joeuhviunrputogms...@forum.dlang.org...
>
> It's called Marketing and Sales department.
>
> Every company that sells commercial products needs to keep adding the
> "next big thing" to their product as a means to sell the product to
> existing users.
>
Meh. Y
teresting to some of
you who prefer to rather not be bothered with the inner
workings of Git.
The release announcement is at:
https://github.com/blog/1127-github-for-windows.
Finally!
I still don't understand what posessd them to do a Mac
version first.
Nobody uses Mac.
Jesus, it&#
On 2012-05-22 12:54, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I wasn't running it on Win8. It was on XP.
Yeah but it seems they're sneaking in UI elements from the mobile
versions of the OS'es. They did the same for the Mac version:
https://github.com/blog/878-announcing-github-for-mac
https://github.com/Bi
>>>> being »the
>>>> easiest way to use Git on Windows«, it might be interesting to some of
>>>> you who prefer to rather not be bothered with the inner workings of
>>>> Git.
>>>>
>>>> The release announcement is at:
>>&g
On 5/22/12 3:41 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-22 09:50, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
See, that must be the problem, I only like crazy insane stuff ;)
I actually did spend about a year using an OSX machine as my primary
system,
and was even impressed *at first*. Then I grew to hate it (It's no
elease announcement is at:
https://github.com/blog/1127-github-for-windows.
Finally!
I still don't understand what posessd them to do a Mac version first.
Nobody
uses Mac.
I don't know if that was sarcasm or what, but... GitHub is used by a lot
of RoR people (and is written in RoR), a
On 2012-05-22 09:52, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Ever since PalmOS was killed off, there's been no such thing as a sane
platform ;)
There are some sane platforms but not any good ones.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2012-05-22 09:50, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
See, that must be the problem, I only like crazy insane stuff ;)
I actually did spend about a year using an OSX machine as my primary system,
and was even impressed *at first*. Then I grew to hate it (It's now sitting,
totally dead, six feet behind me
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jpffa9$99a$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 2012-05-21 21:25, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> Finally!
>>
>> I still don't understand what posessd them to do a Mac version first.
>> Nobody
>> uses Mac.
>
> It's the only sane platform :)
>
Ever since PalmOS was kil
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jpffa9$99a$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 2012-05-21 21:25, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> Finally!
>>
>> I still don't understand what posessd them to do a Mac version first.
>> Nobody
>> uses Mac.
>
> It's the only sane platform :)
>
See, that must be the pro
//windows.github.com/
Although I'm not sure if it really stands up to the promise of being »the
easiest way to use Git on Windows«, it might be interesting to some of
you who prefer to rather not be bothered with the inner workings of Git.
The release announcement is at:
https://github.com/blo
On 2012-05-21 21:25, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Finally!
I still don't understand what posessd them to do a Mac version first. Nobody
uses Mac.
It's the only sane platform :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
//windows.github.com/
Although I'm not sure if it really stands up to the promise of being »the
easiest way to use Git on Windows«, it might be interesting to some of
you who prefer to rather not be bothered with the inner workings of Git.
The release announcement is at:
https://github.com/blo
support was buggy at best.
-Lars
Announced today: Github for Windows!
https://github.com/blog/1127-github-for-windows
"Adam Wilson" wrote in message
news:op.weodtepe707...@invictus.skynet.com...
>
>Having been the MS Build conference it is pretty obvious to me that they
>are trying to build a 'Metro' or WinRT compatible UI. Given their love of
>all things Apple, this would make sense as WinRT is MS's response
ther not be bothered with the inner
workings of Git.
The release announcement is at:
https://github.com/blog/1127-github-for-windows.
Finally!
I still don't understand what posessd them to do a Mac version first.
Nobody uses Mac.
Jesus, it's almost as bad as their web interface. I d
be interesting
>>> to some of you who prefer to rather not be bothered with the inner
>>> workings of Git.
>>>
>>> The release announcement is at:
>>> https://github.com/blog/1127-github-for-windows.
>>>
>>
>> Finally!
>>
>> I st
>>> who prefer to rather not be bothered with the inner workings of Git.
>>>
>>> The release announcement is at:
>>> https://github.com/blog/1127-github-for-windows.
>>>
>>
>> Finally!
>>
>> I still don't understand what posess
ithub.com/
>>
>> Although I'm not sure if it really stands up to the promise of being »the
>> easiest way to use Git on Windows«, it might be interesting to some of
>> you who prefer to rather not be bothered with the inner workings of Git.
>>
>> The release an
ng »the
easiest way to use Git on Windows«, it might be interesting to some of you
who prefer to rather not be bothered with the inner workings of Git.
The release announcement is at:
https://github.com/blog/1127-github-for-windows.
Finally!
I still don't understand what posessd them to do
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
