I am trying to locate replacement semi-rigid cables cables for my old HP 8546A
EMI Receiver. The HP/Agilent/Keysight part number is 85460-20036 but are no
longer available from any source that I can find. These are the (3) cables
with type N connectors joining the EMI receiver (top box) to
We've been told by Rohde & Schwarz that our ESIB receivers are obsolete and
they can't perform repairs on them anymore because of parts unavailability.
Does anyone know of a company that will repair these?
Thank you in advance,
Bill Stumpf, Lab/Technical Manager
D.L.S. Electronic Systems, Inc
.
Brian Kunde
Manager * Compliance Engineering
LECO Corp * Compliance Testing Center
From: Bill Stumpf [mailto:bstu...@dlsemc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 11:39 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] HP 8546A EMI Receiver - Looking for calibration facility
Bob,
You might try
they’re local (California) and ISO 17025 accredited.
Manny Barron
Tuesday, October 23, 2018, 8:20 AM -0700 from bob.sy...@gilbarco.com <
bob.sy...@gilbarco.com >:
>Worldly Experts,
>
>I just learned that Keysight has unceremoniously dropped calibration and
>repair support
We use Hayes for ours.
Regards,
Josh
From: Sykes, Bob [mailto:bob.sy...@gilbarco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 11:21 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] HP 8546A EMI Receiver - Looking for calibration facility
EXTERNAL SENDER: Verify links, attachments and sender before
Bob,
You might try Trescal
Bill
From: Sykes, Bob [mailto:bob.sy...@gilbarco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 10:21 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] HP 8546A EMI Receiver - Looking for calibration facility
Worldly Experts,
I just learned that Keysight has unceremoniously
We don't have the same model though. So, hopefully they can help you.
Josh
From: Wiseman, Joshua
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 11:37 AM
To: 'Sykes, Bob'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: HP 8546A EMI Receiver - Looking for calibration facility
We use Hayes for ours.
Worldly Experts,
I just learned that Keysight has unceremoniously dropped calibration and repair
support for the 8546A EMI receiver.
It's an old beast, but we like it and use it a lot. Does anyone still use one
of these and know of a facility (preferably U.S.) that can calibrate
eivers or, even better, these specific R+S receivers? I have an inquiry in
with our local R+S office on the last point also.
2) What would you consider to be a standard calibration for an EMI
receiver?
Many thanks,
James Pawson
Leading EMC Engineer
Echost
AM
Subject:
Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver
Because EUT may contain inductors and switches
that generate spike when intentional or unintentional switching
or switching ON/OFF during the test.
Invariably the day comes that a BIG transient blows BIG money without
such a protector.
Gert
t coax from the
receiver whenever we were not testing.
The Other Brian
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ken Javor
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 1:03 PM
To: Untitled
Subject: Re: Protect An EMI Receiver
Gert provided an excellent post, but I am puzzled by the need
In message
,
dated Wed, 28 Dec 2011, Grace Lin writes:
Depending on design, some dimmers incorporate a mechanical relay to
satisfy UL 1472 air gap requirement. The relay does create huge click
noise. By the way, a mechanical relay is an incidental radiator per FCC.
Ah, in Europe we do no
Dear John,
Thank you very much for your comments.
Yes, I agree it doesn't necessarily imply damage (we didn't pay for repair
this time). I believe it does imply some potential problems (out of
spec). Several months before the annual calibration, SELFTEST results
failed. We couldn't figure out
of using as much attenuation in front of the analyzer as
possible. There is no point in having a noise floor that is more than 20dB (or
even 10dB) below the average limit, IMHO.
Bob R.
--- On Tue, 12/27/11, Derek Walton wrote:
From: Derek Walton
Subject: Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver
Not entirely correct. The 1 kOhm bleeder working against the 0.25 uF
blocking cap yields a 10:1 voltage divider, open-circuit. Still too much
for an EMI receiver absent adequate attenuation and/or filtering. At 400
cycles (per one post, not the original concern) the problem is greatly
Back in the early 1990s, Tegam supplied a LISN that had a switch which could
be depressed while connecting the EMI receiver to the LISN EMI port.
Without that switch, the open-circuit potential at the EMI port is the line
potential. When the switch is depressed, it shorts out the bleed resistor
ISN.
Doug Powell
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
*From: * Ken Javor
*Date: *Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:40:13 -0600
*To: *
*ReplyTo: * Ken Javor
*Subject: *Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver
Clearly, under the conditions of h
In message
,
dated Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Grace Lin writes:
Hi, Grace.
I need your advice to prevent R&S ESU receiver from damage. A service
report (as a result of annual calibration) indicates "frequency
response out of specification below 10MHz. Adjusted frequency
response. Adjusted the re
The CISPR 16, 5 uH LISN.
Doug Powell
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Ken Javor
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:40:13
To:
Reply-To: Ken Javor
Subject: Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver
Clearly, under the conditions of hundreds of Amperes (what
Richmond
Reply-To:
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:44:56 -0500
To:
Cc: Ken Javor
Subject: Re: Protect An EMI Receiver
Yes, an excellent post.
There is a problem sometimes when using a LISN for 400 Hz power. I
remember a manager at a former employer who didn't want to add a high pass
filter be
-To:
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:27:43 +
To: Ken Javor ,
Subject: Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver
Ken,Having worked power electronics for years, I have on occasion seen
conducted emissions far exceed 107 dBuV. Of course I have routinely
measured emissions on mains of up to 100 amps and more
...@ieee.org] Namens Ken Javor
Verzonden: dinsdag 27 december 2011 19:03
Aan: Untitled
Onderwerp: Re: Protect An EMI Receiver
Gert provided an excellent post, but I am puzzled by the need for all
this protection. Granted I work in a screen room with either dedicated
power or filtered power, but here
kHz.
Why is there even a problem?
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen"
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:26:50 +0100
To:
Conversation: Protect An EMI Receiver
Subject: RE: Protect An EMI Receiver
Happy new year to all, and hope you h
ranted. Also some of these products use AC large contractors and
>> operating these devices while under load can cause huge inductive spikes on
>> the LISN.
>>
>> - Doug Powell
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>> From: Ken Javor
>> D
Yes, an excellent post.
There is a problem sometimes when using a LISN for 400 Hz power. I
remember a manager at a former employer who didn't want to add a high
pass filter between his LISN and receiver when the limit was too low for
an attenuator. He ended up buying a new a receiver attenu
cause huge inductive spikes on the LISN.
>
> - Doug Powell
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> From: Ken Javor
> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:03:23 -0600
> To:
> ReplyTo: Ken Javor
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver
>
> Gert provided an exc
below 150 kHz.
Why is there even a problem?
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen"
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:26:50 +0100
To:
Conversation: Protect An EMI Receiver
Subject: RE: Protect An EMI Receiver
Happy new year to all, and hope
ces
the interference level. 0 Hz - 30 MHz
Doug Powell
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: doug...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:47:18
To: Grace Lin;
Reply-To: doug...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver
Grace,
It is possible to overload the
ng bv
Owner LinkedIn EMC experts group
Van: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] Namens Grace Lin
Verzonden: dinsdag 27 december 2011 17:01
Aan: emc-p...@ieee.org
Onderwerp: Protect An EMI Receiver
Dear Members,
Happy New Year!!!
I need your advice to prevent R&S ESU rece
n Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Grace Lin
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:00:48
To:
Reply-To: Grace Lin
Subject: [PSES] Protect An EMI Receiver
Dear Members,
Happy New Year!!!
I need your advice to prevent R&S ESU receiver from damage. A service
report (as a re
Dear Members,
Happy New Year!!!
I need your advice to prevent R&S ESU receiver from damage. A service
report (as a result of annual calibration) indicates "frequency response
out of specification below 10MHz. Adjusted frequency response. Adjusted
the reference oscillator to optimize frequency
Hi all,
Thanks for all the responses, there were some valuable insights.
I've now got a couple of candidates to put forward as a replacement option.
Regards,
James
> We are budgeting for a replacement for our ageing R&S ESVS10 EMI
> r
Good point Wendy, I always control my Equipment from Compliance 5, so I have
never used the SW that comes with it.
Cheers,
Derek.;
-Original Message-
From: WNya
To: Pawson, James
Cc: EMC-PSTC
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 6:56 pm
Subject: Re: EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
James,
Do
My understanding is that this is whats done...
-Original Message-
From: Ken Javor
To: EMC-PSTC
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 3:03 pm
Subject: Re: EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
I had forgotten about that fact. In what I wrote, the assumption was that an
IF was being fed back to the rest
To: <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
Hello,
We are budgeting for a replacement for our ageing R&S ESVS10 EMI
receiver. Apart from R&S I'v
In message <8ce362b4daae905-16b4-13...@webmail-d105.sysops.aol.com>,
dated Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Derek Walton writes:
>A cable is only its characteristic impedance when fed and terminated in
>matching impedance. That's why I said non-perfect impedance of the
>cable
The characteristic impedance IS
0
> To:
> Subject: Re: EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
>
> In message , dated Wed, 31
> Aug 2011, Ken Javor writes:
>
>> Then the rest of the connection all the way back to the receiver should
>> be well-matched 50 Ohm sections.
>>
> I believe the product in q
etween the antenna and Zo of the cable.
What am I missing?
Cheers,
Derek.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Javor
To: EMC-PSTC
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 12:15 pm
Subject: Re: EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
Expansion on this: “Less issues matching a complex source impedance like and
antenna
In message , dated Wed, 31
Aug 2011, Ken Javor writes:
>Then the rest of the connection all the way back to the receiver should
>be well-matched 50 Ohm sections.
>
I believe the product in question has a fibre-optic link. I wonder what
the impedance of that is. (Half serious.)
--
OOO - Own Op
gt; From: John Woodgate
> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:51:32 +0100
> To:
> Subject: Re: EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
>
> In message , dated Wed, 31
> Aug 2011, Ken Javor writes:
>
>> Cable is usually 50 Ohms.
>
> Well, people do sometimes tread on it or even stand
In message , dated Wed, 31
Aug 2011, Ken Javor writes:
>Cable is usually 50 Ohms.
Well, people do sometimes tread on it or even stand heavy equipment on
it, but in general I agree that, if treated with care, good quality
cable has an impedance more stable and better-behaved than many antennas
-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:56:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: ,
Subject: Re: EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
All good points.
you could add that the antenna would better represent free space. I wonder
what the effect of Cal factors would be?
Less issues matching a complex source
dielectric.
I'm sure there are more.
Cheers,
Derek.
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate
To: EMC-PSTC
Sent: Wed, Aug 31, 2011 11:10 am
Subject: Re: EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
In message <40be5b4eca254ad7bae8a4d5ef896...@tamuracorp.com>, dated Wed,
31 Aug 2011, Bri
In message <40be5b4eca254ad7bae8a4d5ef896...@tamuracorp.com>, dated Wed,
31 Aug 2011, Brian Oconnell writes:
>Why is it good that the 'RF head' is separate and/or can be attached to
>the antenna?
No cable loss?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Wood
: [PSES] EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
Why is it good that the 'RF head' is separate and/or can be attached to the
antenna?
Brian the EMC amateur
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Societ
; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
Just a quick note about the Teseq Receiver. I think you really mean the PMM
marketed by Teseq.
This really is a super little receiver. It's CISPR compliant, but it also does
neat tricks like has a click option, and also
10 cents worth.
Derek Walton
L F Research
-Original Message-
From: Ken Javor
To: EMC-PSTC
Sent: Tue, Aug 30, 2011 10:25 am
Subject: Re: EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
No experience with it, but wondering if anyone else out there has used the
Amplifier Research CER2018A. This is a re
rform
calibration and perform
the occasional repair.
Pat Lawler
EMC Engineer
SL Power Electronics Corp.
"Pawson, James" wrote on 08/30/2011 03:12:14 AM:
> We are budgeting for a replacement for our ageing R&S ESVS10 EMI
> receiver. Apart from R&S I've found Agilen
From: "Pawson, James"
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:12:14 +0100
To: "EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG"
Conversation: EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
Subject: EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
Hello,
We are budgeting for a
I should add that the main standard we test to is EN 55022.
Thanks
James
From: Pawson, James [mailto:james.paw...@echostar.com]
Sent: 30 August 2011 11:12
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EMI Receiver - Recommendations?
Hello,
We are
Hello,
We are budgeting for a replacement for our ageing R&S ESVS10 EMI receiver.
Apart from R&S I've found Agilent and Teseq that make EMI receivers.
Does anyone have any thoughts on which EMI receiver manufacturer they prefer
and why? I'm thinking about things like su
not those of my employer
> [Original Message]
> From: Gert Gremmen
> To:
> Cc:
> Date: 12/5/2008 2:59:15 AM
> Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
>
> OK, but do you think the overload feature is less
> reliable implemented than the actual read-out of a peak value?
> Did the m
In message ,
dated Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Gert Gremmen writes:
>OK, but do you think the overload feature is less reliable implemented
>than the actual read-out of a peak value? Did the manufacturer do a
>lousy job ? We use an instrument to rely on its features, so do we on
>the overload feature
land Richmond [mailto:k...@earthlink.net]
Verzonden: Friday, December 05, 2008 2:48 AM
Aan: Gert Gremmen; Ralph McDiarmid
CC: emc-p...@ieee.org
Onderwerp: RE: EMI Receiver
I believe that relying on a receiver to warn it is in overload is a
mistake. It is important that those performing measurem
Cc:
> Date: 12/4/2008 1:52:19 PM
> Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
>
> I think this is more a theoretic exercise,
> and as true as unlikely to fool you.
>
> Any decent receiver in overload
> does not show a measurement value
> but blinks, reports an error condition (IEEE-bus)
&
In message <000b01c9564c$22d7c8c0$68875a40$@com>, dated Thu, 4 Dec 2008,
dward writes:
>always use his/her own noodle to judge any measurement made
How revolutionary!(;-) Seriously, it's one of those crucial things that
distinguishes professionals from others.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Tr
-6888
direct - 703-880-4841
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Clif Brick
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 11:14 AM
To: Gert Gremmen; Ralph McDiarmid
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
I guess the crux of your argument lies in the definition of &q
Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
I think this is more a theoretic exercise, and as true as unlikely to
fool you.
Any decent receiver in overload
does not show a measurement value
but blinks, reports an error condition (IEEE-bus) or has a bright red
that large ambient signal could readily
make an erroneous conclusion. Now of course if it's all carried out in
a chamber.
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Gert
Gremmen
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 1:50 PM
To: Ralph McDiarmid
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subj
2008 17:57
Aan: emc-p...@ieee.org
Onderwerp: RE: EMI Receiver
That's my understanding too.
Ralph McDiarmid, AScT
Compliance Engineering Group
Xantrex Technology Inc
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Clif
Brick
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 8:50 AM
To:
Brick wrote:
> From: Clif Brick
> Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
> To: "Gert Gremmen" , emc-p...@ieee.org
> Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 2:49 PM
> I could be wrong as it's been a few years, but it seems
> to me that a
> spectrum analyzer receiver in overload will
That's my understanding too.
Ralph McDiarmid, AScT
Compliance Engineering Group
Xantrex Technology Inc
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Clif
Brick
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 8:50 AM
To: Gert Gremmen; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
I
tion helps
Best regards,
Clif
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Gert
Gremmen
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 2:27 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
>From "EUT cost to compliance" point of view I fully agree with this
discussion about
ay, December 03, 2008 4:10 AM
Aan: emc-p...@ieee.org
Onderwerp: RE: EMI Receiver
--- On Tue, 12/2/08, Jim Eichner wrote:
>Amazing the spectrum you get when a really large 50kHz switching
>fundamental slams into the transient limiter.
I remember reading a long time ago that when a transien
--- On Tue, 12/2/08, Jim Eichner wrote:
>Amazing the spectrum you get when a really large 50kHz switching >fundamental
>slams into the transient limiter.
I remember reading a long time ago that when a transient limiter starts to
clamp, it becomes a comb generator. I ran into that recently when
Sent: 02 December 2008 19:12
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
As we often test immature prototypes with high emissions, I am quite
concerned about out-of-band emissions-related effects, and consider a
"real" preselector to be a mandatory part of any system we switch ove
hn McAuley [mailto:john.mcau...@cei.ie]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:46 AM
To: Jim Eichner; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
I notice Rohde and Schwarz have a new "low cost" ESL receiver. Unlike
previous "pre compliance" receivers it appears to be compliant to CIS
the measurement.
By careful use of input attenuation and observing the results, a traditional
skill used by users of spectrum analysers may help?
BR
John McAuley
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Jim Eichner
Sent: 02 December 2008 08:03
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subje
> -Original Message-
> From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf
> Of Jim Eichner
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 12:03 AM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
>
> Indeed, however while I too may be losing the will to live, I
y all
copies of the original message.
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Julian
Jones
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 8:49 AM
To: Untitled
Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
Can we please drop this topic now..I am beginning to lose
the will to live.
From:
field intensity x magnetic field intensity,
Where "x" denotes vector cross-product.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
> From: John Woodgate
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:07:00 +
> To:
> Subject: Re: EMI Receiver
>
> In message , dated Mon, 1
> Dec 2008, Ken Javo
In message
<9d04b979323dcd428297dda95108893e0120c...@bb-corp-ex2.corp.cubic.cub>,
dated Mon, 1 Dec 2008, "Price, Edward" writes:
>So USA 2 billion is a UK billiard?
Of course. The basis is the archaic unit 'ard' = 10^12, so a milliard is
obviously 10^9. (;-)
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try
> From: Julian Jones
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:48:58 -
> To: Untitled
> Conversation: EMI Receiver
> Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
>
> Can we please drop this topic now..I am beginning to lose
> the will to live.
>
> -Original Message-
> From
In message , dated Mon, 1
Dec 2008, Ken Javor writes:
>This may be one of those usage differences that occur on opposite sides
>of the Pond. After all, what we in the USA call a billion, you call a
>milliard, and what you mean by a billion is what we call one trillion.
No, we don't! 'Millia
> -Original Message-
> From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf
> Of Ken Javor
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 8:47 AM
> To: Untitled
> Subject: Re: EMI Receiver
>
> This may be one of those usage differences that occur on
> opposite s
Can we please drop this topic now..I am beginning to lose
the will to live.
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Price,
Edward
Sent: 01 December 2008 16:53
To: Untitled
Subject: RE: EMI Receiver
> -Original Message-
> From: emc-p...@ie
c 2008 16:30:08 +
> To:
> Subject: Re: EMI Receiver
>
> In message , dated Mon, 1
> Dec 2008, Ken Javor writes:
>
>
>> Picking a very small nit, field intensity is measured in terms of Volts
>> per
>> meter, these days. Radiated power density is meas
In message , dated Mon, 1
Dec 2008, Ken Javor writes:
>Picking a very small nit, field intensity is measured in terms of Volts
>per
>meter, these days. Radiated power density is measured in terms of Watts
>per
>square meter.
I thought you would say that. In fact, the terminology is not
co
ll explain in response to Ed Price's posts on
this subject.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
> From: John Woodgate
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:29:48 +0000
> To:
> Subject: Re: EMI Receiver
>
> In message
> ,
> dated Mon, 1 Dec 2008, "Price, Andrew (SELEX GA
In message
,
dated Mon, 1 Dec 2008, "Price, Andrew (SELEX GALILEO, UK)"
writes:
>What was wrong with the old Stoddart/Ailtech Identity?
>
>"EMI/Field Intensity Meter"
But does it measure field intensity, in watts per square metre?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and ww
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Price,
Andrew
(SELEX GALILEO, UK)
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 7:00 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: EMI Receiver
Hi All
elexgalileo.com> cc
Sent by:
emc-p...@ieee.org Subject
Hi All
What was wrong with the old Stoddart/Ailtech Identity?
"EMI/Field Intensity Meter"
Regards
Andy
Andrew P. Price
Principle Hardware Engineer, EMC Specialist
SELEX GALILEO, Sensors & Airborne Systems
Christopher Martin Road
Basildon
Essex SS14 3EL
Mail Ref : K160
( Tel Di
Does anyone out there know of a good source to rent / lease or buy a used one
of these?
Best regards,
William "Mac" Elliott
EMC Engineer
8000 West Sunrise Blvd
Plantation, Florida 33322-9947
Phone: 954.723.5480
Email: fme...@motorola.com
[ X ] General Public
- --
For the 8568B spectrum analyzer and the 85685A pre-selector, does
anybody know when HP stopped making these units?
We are in the market for a spare of each, and want to know whether we're
getting something that is towards the older or newer end of the spectrum
(ya I know but I can't help myself).
Hi Mike,
According to an Agilent representative at the 2007 IEEE symposium in Hawaii,
the combination of the Agilent PSA + pre-selector + signal generator had not
been CISPR 16 certified. If CISPR 16 compliance is important to you, you may
wish to double check with Agilent for the latest status.
Our HP8568 based receivers are nearing end of life (some would say well past
it!) and hence in need of replacement. Given the reliable service they have
provided over 20+ years I’m reluctant to move away from HP/Agilent, so can
anyone offer views on their experience of the Agilent PSA together wit
Dear Members,
I need your help to determine options for an EMI receiver.
1. Time Domain Scan (FFT)
It is my understanding that time domain scan is faster. For a manufacturer,
is it necessary to choose this option (not cheap)? The goal is fully
automation to take data and generate reports
Hello fellow indentured servants.
I recently acquired a slick little LF-EMI Receiver made by Anritsu,
Model ML428B "Interference-Field Strength Meter"
Anritsu informs me they no longer have manuals available for this unit.
None of the usual After Market manual dealers I contacted have
From: Garnier, David S (MED) [mailto:david.garn...@med.ge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 8:06 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: EMI receiver: Dynamic Sciences DSI-2020
Hello,
Has anyone had any experiance with this receiver
that they would be willing to share with me (on
In a message dated 11/19/2003 3:12:16 PM Central Standard Time,
david.garn...@med.ge.com writes:
Hello,
Has anyone had any experiance with this receiver
that they would be willing to share with me (on or
off the listserve?) Interested, also if you are using
any other EMI control S/W package t
Hello,
Has anyone had any experiance with this receiver
that they would be willing to share with me (on or
off the listserve?) Interested, also if you are using
any other EMI control S/W package to control this
guy. I am interested in it's price and it's advertised
compliant cispr 16 detecto
Hello,
Anybody have any experiance with this box that
they would be willing to share?
This is a 9 Khz to 1.2 Ghz emi receiver that is
"fully CISPR 16-1" compliant.
Thanks,
dave garnier
David Garnier
e GE Medic
In a message dated 8/27/2003 6:55:38 PM Central Daylight Time,
gary_mcintu...@msn.com writes:
Just a small heads up John.
I don't have the specs on the instruments that you are discussing but one
of the many things that the NIST folks want to know about your site are the
qualifications of the
OATS, this shouldn't be
an issue.
Have fun. It's always fun spending someone else's money, isn't it?
Ghery Pettit
From: John Jankowski [mailto:john_jankow...@cnt.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:33 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: EMI receiver for OATS
7, 2003 11:32 AM
Subject: EMI receiver for OATS
List members,
I am in the process of expanding the capabilities of our Open Area Test
Site and have been searching for a replacement receiver.
During the IEEE EMC Symposium in Boston, I reviewed two models;
Schaffner - SMR 4518 ( 9khz-18Ghz)
Could all responses please be posted to the list group as I would be
interested in hearing feedback about these 2 instruments as well.
Thanks,
Monty
From: John Jankowski [mailto:john_jankow...@cnt.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:33 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: EMI
List members,
I am in the process of expanding the capabilities of our Open Area Test
Site and have been searching for a replacement receiver.
During the IEEE EMC Symposium in Boston, I reviewed two models;
Schaffner - SMR 4518 ( 9khz-18Ghz)
Dynamic Sciences International - DSI 600 Ser
Are there any opinion of EMI receiver from Schaffner?
I am considering to get one receiver or spectrum analyser to cover up to 26.5
GHz. Cost is an issue and the most important is the services provided. The
rep. of the famous brand of EMI reciver is not very good at servicing the test
lab
Hi all,
I like to use a spectrum analyser more for diagnostics, and a receiver for
compliance work.
Of course I'm biased, but the Schaffner receiver currently covers 1 GHz, and
the new version about to hit the streets goes to around 20 GHz. Both are
CISPR 16 compliant. I personally feel t
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
