On 3-Aug-08, at 10:07 PM, Nick Hughart wrote:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:34 -0500 Nick Hughart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> babbled:
>>
>>
>>> Ian Caldwell wrote:
>>>
Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on
all pages
>>>
On 3-Aug-08, at 4:31 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:48 PM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Yes, and it's up to the company to decide what they need to keep
>> private to
>> make money. That's how companies
On 3-Aug-08, at 4:28 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:46 PM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> People contributing to the community? Sure that's ok for me. That's
>> ok for
>> everyone I believe
On 3-Aug-08, at 2:50 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:46 PM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 3-Aug-08, at 1:27 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey, but that's ok for _YOU_, isn't it?! Y
On 3-Aug-08, at 1:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 3-Aug-08, at 1:04 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:56 PM, dan sinclair <[E
On 3-Aug-08, at 1:27 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:07 PM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 3-Aug-08, at 1:04 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:56 PM, dan sinclair <[E
On 3-Aug-08, at 1:04 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:56 PM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On 3-Aug-08, at 12:43 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 3-Aug-08, at 1:04 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:56 PM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On 3-Aug-08, at 12:43 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 3-Aug-08, at 12:43 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> It seems the license question is still very much discussed. Until
>> now I
>> didn't say much about it. But now I like to add my 2 cents to that
>> topic
On 3-Aug-08, at 3:38 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>> I won't help if it's LGPL. I also won't link to it in my code as I
>> won't fix bugs in it.
>
> People like Cedric and Gustavo and their companies are more open
> minded than you. Their companies work with and on the efl. With he
> BSD licence, t
On 2-Aug-08, at 9:41 PM, Blake Barnett wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:53 PM, dan sinclair wrote:
>>
>> It all comes down to when you're doing the 2.0 release. If you do a
>> 2.0 release in a few months it looks like we just rushed a 1.0 out
>> the
>> do
On 2-Aug-08, at 7:59 PM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
> License
> As most of the code on efl-research project (and most of *my* code) it
> does not have COPYING file, it was left out on purpose, basically to
Leaving out a COPYING file basically makes the code proprietary. No-
one can use it with
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:58 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:03:41 +0200 Andreas Volz
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>>
>>> I vote to use LUA for scripting too. I've embedded it into several
>>> commercial products in the p
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:55 PM, Sthithaprajna Garapaty wrote:
> I'm not saying having a CMS will suddenly bring people to write.
> That's a separate problem.
> I think it will not BLOCK people from writing. There's a difference.
> There are various avenues we can pursue to attract writers.
> Bounties, r
We've tried this about 3 times. Someone comes along and says if we
have a CMS non-technical people will write articles. We implement a
CMS. No-one writes articles. We drop the CMS.
If you want to write news releases put them on blogs. Or write a news
blurb for the front page. If longer artic
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:12 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> As I said, it already happened, don't hide under the "we did not
> official 1.0 yet".
No, it hasn't. If a company jumped on _alpha_ level software and
started to develop around it they have to expect that changes are
coming. Hence the
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:12:00 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> babbled:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> oh of course. details! :) we can dot
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:18 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:53 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On 2-Aug-08, at 1:40 AM, Nick Hughart wrote:
>>> Vincent Torri wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
&
On 2-Aug-08, at 1:51 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>
>>
>> How does our changing now affect them any different then if we
>> changed in 6 months?
>
> As I said, you think that we will release the next major releas
On 2-Aug-08, at 1:40 AM, Nick Hughart wrote:
> Vincent Torri wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'd say you're so eager to release something you're not thinking
>>> about
>>> the impression it gives. Cha
On 2-Aug-08, at 1:37 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>>
>> On 2-Aug-08, at 1:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
>>>>> This is probably better to do before we release. If we put out
>>>>> Edje
>>>>&
On 2-Aug-08, at 1:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
>>> This is probably better to do before we release. If we put out Edje
>>> with Embryo support and then remove Embryo with Edje2 we'll be
>>> pissing
>>> off a lot of people that create themes and applications. Better to
>>> bite the bullet an
On 2-Aug-08, at 12:52 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:39 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> You're releasing something before it should be released just to
>> give the
>> impression of a 1.0 for something that
On 2-Aug-08, at 12:33 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Guys, maybe you're forgetting about it, maybe you're hiding behind the
> "we have not released a stable version for this reason", but the fact
> is that this will happen even now. Since there was not a release,
> people just assumed that
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:55 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:53 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> On 1-Aug-08, at 8:38 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
> Setup a blog on one of the many blogging platforms around and we can
> syndicat
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:55 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:53 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> On 1-Aug-08, at 8:38 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
> Setup a blog on one of the many blogging platforms around and we can
> syndicat
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:46 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> There is also a bug in Edje that has bitten us in Ewl a few times
>> where re-using Edje objects seems to cause strange things to hang
>> around. I believe pfritz was the last person to look into this so he
>> might have some more
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:38 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
> Setup a blog on one of the many blogging platforms around and we can
> syndicate the feed to planet.e.org. As relevant posts appear we can
> add news items about them that point back to the blog.
>
> http://enlightenedjournal.wordpress.com/
>
On 1-Aug-08, at 6:17 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> yeah. i agree we need releases. it's probably our biggest issue.
> right now in
> lib-space i'd want to clean up 2 major thnigs that are currently
> underway:
>
> 1. eina - move fully to using it. remove all data stuff from eco
On 1-Aug-08, at 7:40 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
> I can do that. I've been reading the CVS logs, E-devel discussions
> and stuff
> for years, so I think I can post news and blog about the major
> events in the
> community/changes in the E(FL). The problem is, I am quite tech-
> interested,
>
The COPYING file for this is currently blank. What license is this
work under? Can someone please fill in the COPYING file.
Thanks,
dan
On 30-Jul-08, at 8:46 AM, Enlightenment CVS wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : cedric
> Project : e17
> Module : proto/eina
>
> Dir : e
On 1-Aug-08, at 4:47 PM, dan sinclair wrote:
>> *5. weekly or biweekly articles*
>>
>
> Ditto to 1. They can also write the articles on the Wiki which is
> probably a better choice. Makes them easier to maintain in the long
> run. They can then be linked from the m
On 1-Aug-08, at 2:04 PM, Ian Caldwell wrote:
> What would you like to see on the new website? What goals do you
> think it
> should have.
> My personal views are this is what we need to see differently. Feel
> free to
> chime in and add to what you'd like to see on the new site
>
> *1.
On 1-Aug-08, at 3:41 PM, Veli Ogla Sungutay wrote:
> Articles friends. We need lots of them. Even a small tutorial, small
> usage
> examples would do.
Saying we need articles is fine. Finding people to write good articles
is hard.
dan
--
On 1-Aug-08, at 2:49 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Friday, 01 August 2008, at 20:38:46 (+0200),
> Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>> I have no design, but i have already complained about the web site
>> on the ML. I'm not a good designers, but i think that there are some
>> things that MUST appear on a
On 1-Aug-08, at 10:40 AM, Matteo wrote:
>> because raster did it like that :-D
>> I'm not sure why people don't want to use a cms, but I've being told
>> that they want to keep like that (cvs based).
>
>
> If you keep it CVS-based, it's hard to develop and hard to update
> with news,
> topic an
On 1-Aug-08, at 2:34 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
>> 2. E planet!?! Developers and power users should few lines on e
>> status of
>> developement. This involves.
>
> right now, e planet has not a lot of topics related to development
>
You'll also notice that about 90% of planet.e.o content is my
> That's true, and it is bad. If we want to use it we have to clean up
> the aggregated feeds. In fact planet is just a feed aggregator, a very
> good feed aggregator, but imho it could be good to have an official E
> blog.
I really don't see the point of a blog. Why not just put your blog
entry
On 31-Jul-08, at 4:14 PM, Bruno wrote:
> On Thu, 31 July 2008 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 31-Jul-08, at 3:48 PM, Bruno wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 31 July 2008 Toma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> If anything, it might be an idea to a
On 31-Jul-08, at 3:48 PM, Bruno wrote:
> On Thu, 31 July 2008 Toma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If anything, it might be an idea to ask people, what 'needs' to be
>> done? I see a few people on IRC and on forums saying, "E17 is good,
>> but its just not finished/has bits missing". Some lusers go
On 27-Jul-08, at 5:54 AM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> As you never cared about building a large community of foss
> developers,
> you have thus helped to create a largely dysfunctional project
> starved of
> resources. That's as much a part of E's legacy as anything good it
> may have
> stoo
On 25-Jul-08, at 7:48 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> Peter wrote:
>
>> to it and the original code was LGPL. But would you share code with
>> someone, that doesn't share code with you?
>>
>
> Good point. And that's precisely why many people don't like to
> contribute to bsd licensed projects.
On 24-Jul-08, at 1:25 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>> i have to say now.. success in the open source world is utterly
>> UNRELATED to
>> what kind of open source license you use. it is a hindrance if you
>> are not
>> open. in fact GPL as a license for a library can be a hindrance. i
>> could qu
On 24-Jul-08, at 5:26 PM, Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb:
>> One thing I'd like to see here is the opinion of those that do most
>> of
>> the code these days, guys like englebass, dj2, pfritz and raster. You
>> wrote lots of code already, and continue to do, what do y
On 22-Jul-08, at 3:58 PM, Dan Kronstal wrote:
> I don't know if I'm missing the point here, but it sounds like
> OpenID is
> redundant. What we've got here is three subdomains with three
> logins/accounts when they could all be using one instead. bugtracker/
> trac
> are their own sites with t
Your code marked Dead code is actually code used to shut up compiler
warnings about unused variables. So, not dead.
dan
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Enlightenment CVS <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : ravenlock
> Project : e17
> Module : libs/ecore
>
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Monday, 16 June 2008, at 15:33:23 (+0200),
> Cedric BAIL wrote:
>
>> On this topic, I believe we have two choice, libtomcrypt
>> (http://libtom.org/?page=features&newsitems=5&whatfile=crypt) and
>> openssl. My opinion on this subject is certainly biased as I already
Why did you comment out all the printfs for invalid files? Those can be
useful if the .ini file is actually screwed up.
dan
Enlightenment CVS wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : raster
> Project : e17
> Module : libs/efreet
>
> Dir : e17/libs/efreet/src/lib
>
>
> Modifi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Enlightenment CVS committal
>>
>> Author : dj2
>> Project : e17
>> Module : libs/efreet
>>
>> Dir : e17/libs/efreet/src/lib
>>
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> efreet_ini.c
>>
>>
>> Log Message:
>> - if we can't parse the INI file we can't set ini->data so return NULL
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> dan sinclair wrote:
>
>> To what end? What's the point of tying them together like this? It would
>> be better, in the long run, to just have a single widget library instead
>> of 3.
>>
>>
>
> The 'one t
andres wrote:
> El Tuesday 01 April 2008 18:33:22 dan sinclair escribió:
>> I think this is a lot of effort to save the themer the extra 20 minutes
>> it will take to change the images in the 3 theme files instead of just one.
>>
> This covers much more than images. T
andres wrote:
> El Tuesday 01 April 2008 18:17:01 dan sinclair escribió:
>> The thing is, you aren't gaining anything. The themer still has to theme
>> everything twice. All you have is a basic set of images they reference.
>> Which they could have, and just copy into th
andres wrote:
> dj2 wrote:
>> Ewl themes don't have a 'label' text portion of the button. The button
>> has a child label widget which is the text.
>>
> well, that's not important, each theme file (theme_ewl.edj, theme_etk.edj)
> uses the elements as needed, the end result will be the same from th
andres wrote:
> El Tuesday 01 April 2008 14:57:04 The DarkMaster escribió:
>> Andre's idea looks very interesting to me (I never mentioned, by the way,
>> that EWl or anything else should be reduced to something like GTK.
> Oh. I didn't meant to say you wanted that. My point was that complete unit
The DarkMaster wrote:
> I think almost everyone is understimating the problem. This is a very bad
> issue only Enlightenment has and a lot people asks why does this happen,
> even in our OpenGEU FOrums. Even creting EWL, ETK, etc. themes is really
> something bad a user has to do. Once you create a
Toma wrote:
>> I'm not sure, but I think it's possible to place the EWL and ETK theme
>> inside the e17 theme itself...someone can confirm this?
>>
>>
>
> No you cant. They both have seperate EDJ's and their own theme choosers.
> Toma
Actually, you can. At least with Ewl you could combine the t
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>> > >However you have it (though rel coords would seem best),
>> > > if you really want ewl to be a flexible tool for building
>> > > artistic, rich apps, then you'll want a natural way to
>> > > arbitrarily position child *widgets* - not just evas objects..
>> > > an
andres wrote:
> El Wednesday 19 March 2008 19:26:18 dan sinclair escribió:
>> Currently Ewl positions widgets based on absolute coordinates. This
>> works but isn't unnecessarily optional. Thoughts on changing the
>> internals of Ewl to use parent relative placement of
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> > You can do this now with Ewl. The only problem being, everything
> > is absolute coordinates which is a bit strange for this kind of
> > widget. If you want to do this, inherit ewl_box, remove configure
> > event, add your own configure and use ewl_object_place to put
PI from an app development perspective.
>
> Dale.
> dan sinclair wrote:
>> I'm assuming that they'd love some performance related patches.
>> Writing something from scratch isn't a good response to a performance
>> issue unless there is some fundamental r
Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
> dan sinclair schrieb:
>> Currently Ewl positions widgets based on absolute coordinates. This
>> works but isn't unnecessarily optional. Thoughts on changing the
>> internals of Ewl to use parent relative placement of widgets?
>>
>>
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> Dan wrote:
>
> > Currently Ewl positions widgets based on absolute coordinates. This
> > works but isn't unnecessarily optional. Thoughts on changing the
> > internals of Ewl to use parent relative placement of widgets?
> >
> > This would, hopefully, simplify some
ctly provide stellar parsing performance does it?,
> which appears to me a majority of peoples complaints regarding XML use.
>
> Dale.
>
>
>
> dan sinclair wrote:
>> Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>>> Massimiliano wrote:
>>>
>>> > >
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
> Massimiliano wrote:
>
> > > > Might I suggest exporting the efreet xml parser and use it
> > > > instead? Does anyone object? Using strstr to parse xml isn't
> > > > very nice.
> > > >
> > > > Sebastian
> > >
> > > On my side i don't have any preference, i initial
Currently Ewl positions widgets based on absolute coordinates. This
works but isn't unnecessarily optional. Thoughts on changing the
internals of Ewl to use parent relative placement of widgets?
This would, hopefully, simplify some of the container code and allow for
more code re-use internall
Jess wrote:
> Is there a dedicated person we should send the email to? Or just email the
> list? Sorry, not familiar with the etiquette here.
>
Recording them into wiki.enlightenment.org would probably be the best
bet. A much more stable and easy to use record then the mailing list.
dan
---
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> better than in the mailing list :) though trac is also a wiki... :) but as
> such
> the trac stuff is for more of an "official todo list". SoC stuff is right now
> just banter :)
>
Is this were I resist the urge to mention that having two wiki's seems
s
Vincent Torri wrote:
> about these suggestions, would it be interesting to add them in the trac
> main page ?
I think wiki.enlightenment.org would make more sense then trac.
dan
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsof
On 7-Jan-08, at 10:26 AM, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Monday, 07 January 2008, at 09:21:25 (-0600),
> Ravenlock wrote:
>
>> Either way... the sources are a hodgepodge of formatting. I wonder
>> what folks would think of a document formalizing the style of the
>> sources. And possible a set of s
There are some documents on the wiki on creating widgets in Edje. You
can also try talking to dresb as he's doing that documentation stuff
at the moment. You can see the wiki at wiki.enlightenment.org.
Otherwise, I'd say embed Ewl into your application as it will make
development a lot fast
No reason to cvs remove. Just leave the file there. You can cvs update
with new files added. In order to use cvs diff -Nu you have to cvs add
the file first. Otherwise cvs doesn't know it's a new file.
dan
On 6-Dec-07, at 11:01 PM, Dave Andreoli wrote:
>
>
>> Just cvs add the file first.
>>
Just cvs add the file first.
dan
On 6-Dec-07, at 10:27 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Friday, 07 December 2007, at 04:11:54 (+0200),
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> to avoid this copies, just diff -ur /dev/null your-new-file >> patch,
>> CVS sucks, I know :-P
>
> cvs diff -Nu works just
This is great. I've had this on my plate for a while but haven't done
it for two reasons. 1) no time and 2) while I was doing the first 3
the header and stylesheet were still in flux so I didn't want to go
too far.
Everything seems to have settled for the website so I think now is a
good t
Sounds like a good idea. We can also stick the docbook source into the
e17/docs directory with the other books if you want.
dan
On 2-Dec-07, at 7:53 AM, andres wrote:
> If I combine my two articles:
> http://wiki.enlightenment.org/index.php/Development_with_Edje:_Introduction
> http://wiki.en
The e17 theme and the ewl_embed_test theme are totally independent.
There is no shared code, or anything else, between them.
dan
On 30-Nov-07, at 10:25 AM, Martin Zwickel wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:03:40 -0500
> Will Keaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bubbled:
>
>> FWIW, I've noticed that when b
Oh, Evas Errors. Sorry, wasn't paying attention. I thought you were
talking about Ewl warnings. I haven't tried to turn on the Evas stuff
before.
dan
On 19-Nov-07, at 8:18 PM, Brett Nash wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 19:54 -0500, dan sinclair wrote:
>> I'm not seei
I'm not seeing this when I have full debug on with Ewl. Can you please
post an example program that shows this behavour? We've been trying to
cleanup as many of the warnings as we can in the system. There are a
few warnings spit but not many.
dan
On 19-Nov-07, at 7:14 PM, Brett Nash wrote:
ecore_con should be removed from ecore. Other then that it looks good.
dan
On 19-Nov-07, at 10:46 AM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
> Hi, as the "ecore split" topic is around the ml again, after talking
> to dj2 on irc there was a crucial point to decide what should stay and
> what should be spl
Having two systems is going to quickly get out of hand. The longer they
both exist the harder this is going to be to fix it. We currently track
our todo lists and bugs in bugzilla. We just mark todos as enhancements.
You, of course, have the ability to add comments and we have a wiki
setup alre
The fact that trac has been added as a link on the main title bar makes
it seem pretty official. It also means that anyone coming to the site
will use trac instead of bugzilla which isn't on the main titlebar.
dan
Nick Hughart wrote:
> This was not meant to turn into a big deal. Trac is up th
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> I also like bugzilla completeness, but unless we'll create
> hierarchical bug dependencies, it doesn't worth the pain.
>
We already use bug dependencies in Ewl and we have to keep this
capability. If Trac can't handle this it isn't an option.
dan
> El Tuesday 13 November 2007 03:38:58 Vincent Torri escribió:
>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, dan sinclair wrote:
>> > Did you remove collections.group.parts.part.description.color_class,
>> > color, color2, color3 on purpose? If so, what's the reasoning behind
>> >
Did you remove collections.group.parts.part.description.color_class,
color, color2, color3 on purpose? If so, what's the reasoning behind
this? (lines 139-142 and 1620 - 1694)
dan
On 13-Nov-07, at 1:08 AM, Ben Rockwood wrote:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007
On 11-Nov-07, at 10:52 AM, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Nov 10, 2007 10:07 PM, Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 03:46:44PM +0100, Michel BRIAND wrote:
>>> Hi,
>> Hi
>>>
>>> Fist, your involvement and wisdom as team leader is respected and
On 21-Jul-07, at 12:29 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:07:11 -0400 dan sinclair
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>> All,
>>
>> We've had Efreet in CVS for a while now and it seems to be working
>> well.
>&g
David Seikel wrote:
> raster highly recommends that everything get updated at once. I agree
> with him.
>
If by that you mean that the person changing the API fix everything in
cvs, that's the exact opposite of what Raster said. He said it can take
a lot of time to fix, and you should only bre
All,
We've had Efreet in CVS for a while now and it seems to be working well.
Taking a look at the other apps in CVS the only one still using
Ecore_Desktop that I noticed was Engage.
Can the Engage maintainer please update the app to use Efreet so we can
move Ecore_Desktop over into proto?
Th
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
> On 7/10/07, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 9-Jul-07, at 8:13 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
>>
>> > On 7/9/07, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
On 9-Jul-07, at 8:13 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
> On 7/9/07, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I want to reply before this thread ends discussing only the "how
>> do we
>> patch projects" topic, as it is just a small part of the real
>> problem.
>> I've seen
David Seikel wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:29:37 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 20:05:30 -0400 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> babbled:
>>
>> > On 8-Jul-07, at 7:51 PM, Carsten Hai
They changed the simple search so it requires a keyword. But, you can
click search, Advanced Search tab, then just hit search and it will give
everything. (You can then save this search at the bottom of the list and
it will be added into your footer where you can just click the link)
dan
Zach
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:51 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> Maybe we need to have official IRC logs? Maybe add a #ecode channel
> whose ONLY
> purpose is discussion of code, design, direction ideas etc. No help
> questions -
> no random discussion. Log it and put that up on-line. If yo
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:59 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 19:55:08 -0400 dan sinclair
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>>>
>>> i swear i recently cleaned out the patches - like a few weeks back?
>>> Actually.. .I think we
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:51 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
>> beyond that, as my first post to this mailing list, I do want to
>> commend all the work that has been done so far, it is really quite
>> impressive; secondly, (and this is a purely selfish request) in what
>> library / place wo
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 02:35:15 +0300 "Hisham Mardam Bey"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>> On 7/9/07, Виктор Кожухаров <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
One of the options would be to assign a maintainer to each piece of
>>
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:35 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
>
> The question that I will ask again is, "why do we have patches that
> are several months old on our mailing list that have not been given a
> yes or no yet?".
>
Probably because they got lost in a flood of email and the author
never popped u
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:40 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
> On 7/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Again, from an outsiders perspective, I thought it might be useful to
>> pop in a word.
>>
>> With regards to being just a WM or being a full desktop
>> environment or
>> being a deskt
>
> yes, you're nuts ;) (sorry you set yourself up for that)
> Second point I also think we should use bugzilla it may be a bit
> overkill but at least it does wtf we want it to do so I vote we
> setup bugzilla and I'm willing to do so, but we know you spent a
> lot of time setting this one
We've been trying the new Bug genie bug tracker for a little while now
and I must say, I'm pretty disappointed in it's abilities. It took a lot
of effort to get setup, and we haven't been able to figure out how to do
simple things like change a bugs product or attach patches after the bug
has b
It can't run on evas directly as it needs to know how to receive mouse
and key events. But, the Ewl engines are setup with dependencies. So, if
you take a look at evas_fb at the top you'll see an
ewl_engine_dependencies function that declares "evas" as it's parent.
It then just implements the e
1 - 100 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
