On Tue, 15 May 2018 19:21:55 +0200 Marcel Hollerbach said:
> Do what you like, call the time here. I give this up. I deleted the
> calendar item and removed the wiki content regarding the proposed solution.
>
> I proposed this now 7 days ago, no one was opposed you even wrote
> "I'm in on this.
On Tue, 15 May 2018 21:48:05 +0200 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
>
> On 05/15/2018 07:21 PM, Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
> > Do what you like, call the time here. I give this up. I deleted the
> > calendar item and removed the wiki content regarding the proposed solution.
> >
> > I proposed thi
On Tue, 15 May 2018 13:49:46 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr."
said:
> On Tue, 15 May 2018 19:21:55 +0200
> Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
>
> > Do what you like, call the time here. I give this up. I deleted the
> > calendar item and removed the wiki content regarding the proposed
> > solution.
> >
>
Hello.
On 05/15/2018 07:21 PM, Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
> Do what you like, call the time here. I give this up. I deleted the
> calendar item and removed the wiki content regarding the proposed solution.
>
> I proposed this now 7 days ago, no one was opposed you even wrote
> "I'm in on this. Alr
I uncancelled the event.
Have this meeting since it was already scheduled, discussion and
fine-tuning of schedule can continue independently. If a change is decided
on, the schedule can be altered later.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 1:50 PM William L. Thomson Jr. <
wlt...@obsidian-studios.com> wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2018 19:21:55 +0200
Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
> Do what you like, call the time here. I give this up. I deleted the
> calendar item and removed the wiki content regarding the proposed
> solution.
>
> I proposed this now 7 days ago, no one was opposed you even wrote
> "I'm in on th
Do what you like, call the time here. I give this up. I deleted the
calendar item and removed the wiki content regarding the proposed solution.
I proposed this now 7 days ago, no one was opposed you even wrote
"I'm in on this. Already added it to my own personal calendar with
notifications etc.
We tried that last time, and you where the only one from the KR Timezone
while there are many committers from that part of the world, thats why i
say, try it this week with the other time, and see if it changes :)
Also i dont see a problem with doing 2 meetings close to each other,
where one g
On 15/05/18 15:05, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2018 18:38:38 +0200 Marcel Hollerbach said:
>
>> I dont have strong feelings if its either shifted by 12h or by something
>> else. Just reminding you, UTC + 20 means that there will likely be noone
>> else part of the
On Mon, 14 May 2018 18:38:38 +0200 Marcel Hollerbach said:
> I dont have strong feelings if its either shifted by 12h or by something
> else. Just reminding you, UTC + 20 means that there will likely be noone
> else part of the meeting beside US people. I dont want to propose that
> some timez
To be clear, my original point regarding a 12 hour difference between the
meetings assumes that the selected times are viable for everyone and that
it engages the maximum number of contributors: it's easier to remember a
meeting time if it's always at the same numerical hour.
In the case where a 1
I dont have strong feelings if its either shifted by 12h or by something
else. Just reminding you, UTC + 20 means that there will likely be noone
else part of the meeting beside US people. I dont want to propose that
some timezone needs to be active in both meethings, but it could
definitly hel
As Mike suggested and I've been saying... the meetings need to be exactly
12 hours apart, not 8 hours. So if Tuesday was UTC+8, Thursday would be
UTC+20... then the next Tuesday UTC+20 and the next Thursday UTC+8, etc...
On Mon, May 14, 2018, 9:42 AM Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
> Okay, then lets sa
Okay, then lets say that we meet at the first full week and every third
full week, always on Tuesday and Thursday.
On the first week Tuesday is at UTC + 8 and Thursday at UTC + 16.
In the third week Tuesday is at UTC + 16 and Thursday at UTC + 8.
(This month however is a exception and we start th
This is actually similar to how many projects organize their meetings.
Having two separate meetings at "opposite" times allows everyone to have a
choice of meetings to attend with at least one of the times being optimal
for any given location. Using proper recording methods, everyone is then
able t
Perhaps we should -- otherwise I see people voting and making decisions in
one group that the other group would not agree to at all, as well as the
fact that the North American group is pretty heavily E devs and the
European/Asian group is pretty heavily interfaces/EFL ... without crossover
there I
On Thu, 10 May 2018 19:07:56 + Stephen Houston said:
> I'm well aware the other time slot allows for North Americans but it will
> then cut out anyone else. That's the point I was making - there is going
> to be little crossover. between the two groups of people meeting - and I
> don't think
I'm well aware the other time slot allows for North Americans but it will
then cut out anyone else. That's the point I was making - there is going
to be little crossover. between the two groups of people meeting - and I
don't think that is a good thing.
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 2:06 PM Carsten Hai
On Thu, 10 May 2018 14:55:07 + Stephen Houston said:
> This was the best time you could come up with for the meetings? 4-6AM EST,
> 3-5AM CDT, 2-4AM MST, and 1-3AM PDT? That pretty much means that no North
> Americans are going to be present at all... at least with the time we were
> using
From the original email:
"(Times can be discussed, they are copied from
https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Contact#Weekly_Meetings thx
Christophe Sadoine)"
So yes *for now* its the best i had as an example, feel free to propose
something else :)
Greetings,
bu5hm4n
On 05/10/2018
This was the best time you could come up with for the meetings? 4-6AM EST,
3-5AM CDT, 2-4AM MST, and 1-3AM PDT? That pretty much means that no North
Americans are going to be present at all... at least with the time we were
using for the meetings previously, it is reasonable enough for North
Amer
On 05/10/2018 09:22 AM, Simon Lees wrote:
On 10/05/18 13:20, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2018 17:17:14 + Mike Blumenkrantz
said:
While I can see some summarization of meeting items on the relatively
obscure https://phab.enlightenment.org/V33, which is inaccessible to anyone
Come on, relax :)
On 05/10/2018 05:50 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2018 17:17:14 + Mike Blumenkrantz
said:
While I can see some summarization of meeting items on the relatively
obscure https://phab.enlightenment.org/V33, which is inaccessible to anyone
who has not been avidl
On 10/05/18 13:20, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 09 May 2018 17:17:14 + Mike Blumenkrantz
> said:
>
>> While I can see some summarization of meeting items on the relatively
>> obscure https://phab.enlightenment.org/V33, which is inaccessible to anyone
>> who has not been avidly followin
On Wed, 09 May 2018 17:17:14 + Mike Blumenkrantz
said:
> While I can see some summarization of meeting items on the relatively
> obscure https://phab.enlightenment.org/V33, which is inaccessible to anyone
> who has not been avidly following the mailing list archives--ie. will never
> be visib
On Wed, 09 May 2018 17:17:14 +
Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> While I can see some summarization of meeting items on the relatively
> obscure https://phab.enlightenment.org/V33, which is inaccessible to
> anyone who has not been avidly following the mailing list
Actually correction, its not acce
While I can see some summarization of meeting items on the relatively
obscure https://phab.enlightenment.org/V33, which is inaccessible to anyone
who has not been avidly following the mailing list archives--ie. will never
be visible to any new community members--this is not quite the same as
record
On Wed, 09 May 2018 13:58:52 + Mike Blumenkrantz
said:
> Typically for meetings where items of substance are discussed, the minutes
> will be recorded for posterity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minutes
we already did that fr the past 2 irc meetings 2 weeks ago so i see no reason
this won't
Typically for meetings where items of substance are discussed, the minutes
will be recorded for posterity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minutes
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 1:26 PM Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
>
> On 05/08/2018 06:35 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > I think it's important to create a pag
Lets try it.
here is the group you can join for getting a invite:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/project/view/204/
Here is the event with the linked wiki page:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/E15
Greetings,
bu5hm4n
On 05/09/2018 03:54 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue, 8 May
On Tue, 8 May 2018 13:54:09 +0200 Marcel Hollerbach said:
I'm in on this. Already added it to my own personal calendar with notifications
etc. :)
> Updated version:
>
> i) We do two meetings a month:
> 1) 1st Tuesday of each month at 8h UTC
> 2) 3rd Thursday of each month at 16h UTC
>
On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:26:16 +0200
Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
> On 05/08/2018 06:35 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > I think it's important to create a page which tracks meeting
> > "minutes" for each meeting so that at any time people can review
> > the contents of meetings they were unable to atte
On Tue, 8 May 2018 21:31:22 +0930
Simon Lees wrote:
> On 08/05/18 21:24, Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
> > Updated version:
> >
> >> Rather then having to be subscribed to something (or as well as) it
> >> would be nice if something sent a meeting reminder email to this
> >> list 24hrs before each m
On 05/08/2018 06:35 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
I think it's important to create a page which tracks meeting "minutes" for
each meeting so that at any time people can review the contents of meetings
they were unable to attend or, for newer community members, see what the
community has been doin
True, maybe things are getting better if we pick such things up each
meeting. However, this thread is about the structure, can you bump the
other two ? :)
On 05/08/2018 05:31 PM, Stephen Houston wrote:
Yes - We have already forgotten about so much of this. The review thread
needs to be bump
I think it's important to create a page which tracks meeting "minutes" for
each meeting so that at any time people can review the contents of meetings
they were unable to attend or, for newer community members, see what the
community has been doing recently.
Probably the easiest way to do this wou
Yes - We have already forgotten about so much of this. The review thread
needs to be bumped and discussed more and the release thread needs to be
bumped and discussed more as well. Everything has already gone back silent.
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:02 AM Simon Lees wrote:
>
>
> On 08/05/18 21:2
On 08/05/18 21:24, Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
> Updated version:
>
>> Rather then having to be subscribed to something (or as well as) it
>> would be nice if something sent a meeting reminder email to this list
>> 24hrs before each meeting as well.
>>
>
> We can do that the first few weeks, but fo
Updated version:
i) We do two meetings a month:
1) 1st Tuesday of each month at 8h UTC
2) 3rd Thursday of each month at 16h UTC
(Times can be discussed, they are copied from
https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Contact#Weekly_Meetings thx
Christophe Sadoine)
ii) We create 'Re
On 08/05/18 20:16, Marcel Hollerbach wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It has been now over 10 days of the last meeting, we concluded that we
> should do them every second week and somehow already almost forgot about
> it.
>
> So here is another proposal that makes things more scheduled:
>
> i) We do two meet
Hello,
It has been now over 10 days of the last meeting, we concluded that we
should do them every second week and somehow already almost forgot about it.
So here is another proposal that makes things more scheduled:
i) We do two meetings a month:
1) 1st of each month at 8h UTC
2) 17st
41 matches
Mail list logo