GFI used to be really good at Tech Support in EMEA. I have head they've
gone downhill somewhat of late. MimeSweeper is still in a strong
position over here.
Mark Arnold, MVP(Exchange)
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 August 2002 00:28
I'm getting this error but it's not from logoff.asp. MS PSS had me uninstall,
reinstall IIS, SP2, Exchange 2k, E2k SP3 in that order on our Exchange server. Now I
get these errors every few minutes. Also people with mailboxes on that server can not
access it with OWA.
Wilson
-Origi
Used several versions with Exchange 5.5. Found the released versions to be
of "beta" quality and reliability. Found the tech support to be shabby at
best (I think they had two people total handling all the calls). It was a
real pain in the rear to administer - and had limitations which made it
I have been looking at the SurfControl products. They are a little spendy,
but if you are a large company, seems to be a product that is well worth the
money. Our quote came to right around $60k for 1000 user licenses, support
and contracts and the additional plug-ins I wanted. This was a 3-yea
My company needs a product to block by domain, sender. We must also be
able to block spam, email attachments. We are currently using software
called eSafe which is less than what we had hoped for and we are looking
for another option. Any recommendations. We are looking at this software
from GFI c
Apparently a problem with semantics.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IS disk at 100% utilization - HELP!
OK, just going by your original figures - 27g, 25g f
Glad it worked!
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 6:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
BRAVO That indeed fixed the problem. It was a Win2K DNS issue - The
Exchange server would query the DNS t
BRAVO That indeed fixed the problem. It was a Win2K DNS issue - The
Exchange server would query the DNS to resolve the domain name and the Win2K
would give a failure response. SP3 for Win2K fixed the DNS issue and all my
emails are now going through.
Thanks to Thomas !!
-Original Messag
OK, just going by your original figures - 27g, 25g free.
-Original Message-
From: Sauer, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IS disk at 100% utilization - HELP!
Primary partition for the "system"
I would also be looking at ComVault Galaxy.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MS Exchange Archiving Software
Hi,
I wanted to find out if anyone has used any software applicati
On Wed August 28 2002 19:48, Tom.Gray wrote:
> The problem is with Norton Antivirus for Exchange 2.xxx
>
> If you delete from the server (such as in OWA) everything is just fine. If
> you delete a bunch of items with attachments from a client outlook dies.
> Something about the timeout for delet
Remember you can always run the newer version on a workstation that is
running 2000 and not be stuck with the NT only version
.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: exm
Thanks Thomas. Seems like that might be the cause of the problem. I am
running a Win2K DNS server.
I'm going to update the SP to fix this problem and check if that resolves
the issue.
Will report back on the results.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Primary partition for the "system" is on a different spindle from the IS and
log files. System, directory, log files and IS each have their own spindles.
Primary partition free space is 2.6 Gb or 66%. The disk utilization, % read
time, is for the IS only. All other spindles are at or below 1%.
Only having 7% free space on your primary petition is not enough.
Consider freeing up some space on that disk or investing in more/bigger
drives?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Sauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E
Only about 7% free on your primary partition? Depending on how big your
paging file is, that's not enough free space. Try and move some stuff
off that drive or consider more/bigger disks.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Sauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002
What DNS are you using? If you're using Win2K or NT4.0 DNS take a look
at Q295933. This would cause the behavior you are seeing.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
Well, I just tried sending a message from an Exchange 5.5 sp4 server to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and got back an immediate NDR with "551 User not local.
Relaying not allowed". Kind of whacky, but certainly the lack of an MX record didn't
cause any problems.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From:
Disk going bad? What does Insight Manager have to say?
Jim Helfer
-Original Message-
From: Steve Sauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IS disk at 100% utilization - HELP!
Around 4:00 pm last night, a
Around 4:00 pm last night, as close as I can tell, I received a few
scattered reports that one of my Exchange servers was responding
vry slowly. I took a look and didn't immediately see anything
wrong -- My Outlook was responding normally. This morining the Helpdesk
got flooded with call
No..I do have a PTR record
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
What about a reverse lookup PTR record. Maybe that's what you need.
Thank you,
Alex Gonzalez
I just checked my queue and verified all those emails that were in there
with status of "Network error during host resolution" and they all were
missing an MX record. So it seems like my Exchange 5.5. server just will not
send to domains missing an MX record.
Any help on this would be much appreci
I agree with Chris - If the goal of the organization is collaboration (I
know I will get flamed for this) nothing beats Notes - I have managed both
environments each environment has its strength and weakness but in terms of
true collaboration and knowledge sharing Notes/Domino is the stronger
solu
> Can I stop someone from using my administrator SMTP address?
Yes, just surrender any and all domain names you own.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/s
It's not just that the site is missing an Mx record, they also lack a valid
PTR for their A record. The number of domains which so poorly manage their
DNS is thankfully small, relatively speaking.
> -Original Message-
> From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August
Never underestimate a dead horse ;-)
Notes/Domino and the other integrating products like SameTime (used by
the US Navy because it was the only one 2-3 years back which offered
encrypted Instant Messaging with logging etc.) and QuickPlace (which
scales way better than Sharepoint and offers other
I had to relay to work around this issue. Has anyone else had similar issues
with Exchange 5.5 not being able to send email to domains with a missing MX
record ?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 3:11 PM
To: Exchange
About 4-6 months ago (before I got cable modem service), I had TWO of my old
AOL accounts used for spamming purposes, even though they had strong
passwords on them. I changed my password to another 9-character strong
password, and within two weeks, it had happened again. Upon changing my
passwor
What you could do is create another shared contact list with those
consultants in it. That might simulate what you are trying to do.
Maybe???
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Su
Title: RE: MS Exchange Archiving Software
Storagetek and Legato use the same product. It was originally developed by OTG software, and OTG was bought out by Legato. We are going with the StorageTek solution here because we are already using their ASM product for several other applications, a
IMHO it depends on what the company culture leans towards.
If it is hardcore collaboration and mail is an afterthought then Notes might
be the way to go; although Exchange is catching up day by day.
If it is hardcore mail and communicaiton of the one to one, one to many type
then Exhcange cannot b
Let me see if I understand
... so somebody somewhere else is SPAMMING all these folks
and using my Administrator SMTP address as the mail sender. So AOL and
MSN servers are just telling my server that the messages did not go
through
to the recipients.
Would it tell me if some are getting throug
Notes is dead.
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/02/08/26/020826opcurve.xml
But seriously, there are quite a few things I like about Domino that
Exchange has yet to offer.
Good luck either way.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, Au
All I can say, man, is GFL. And I am sorry.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Lotus Notes help - sort of
All,
Our corporate mangers have decided that we need to rep
That dunnit! Once I switched to one of my Windows 2000 XCH 5.5 servers and
ran the exmerge from the Exchange 2000 CD it worked like a charm! Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: "Dale Geoffrey Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Augus
All,
Our corporate mangers have decided that we need to replace our perfectly
running Exchange system with Lotus Notes.
The push for change is being led from the top (non-IT) managers; I could not
find anyone at any IT personnel at our plants that was actually for this
change (Exchange to Domin
The messages do have different message IDs.
I've had it happen a few times since my last message to the list, and can't see
anything different in the tracking logs between the situations when both messages
arrive, and those where only one arrives. In both cases the logs show both messages to
h
I tried the one that ships with Exchange 2000 but it will not run on an NT4
server.
I will check and see if I can get those versions.
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: "Dale Geoffrey Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28,
Upgrade your ExMerge. There is a 3.71 and a 4.0 version out that probably
will eliminate some of your problems.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exmerge help
Any Ideas?
Any Ideas? The Q article mentions:
If you receive the following error:
Error creating Message Service (MSPST MS)
Make sure that Exchange client is installed on the computer that Exmerge.exe
is running on.
Does anyone know if they literally mean the old exchange client or will
Outlook 2000 suffi
I can log into mine from my desk and try to login to a co-worker, and I
can get mine, not his, same server, everything...
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subj
We'll they do access the Internet and certain apps on the Intranet. They will send
email internally all day no problem is sending out to the Internet that is the issue.
I have thought of the second SMTP server idea but no one wants to buy another system.
What I was hoping for is to find a wa
Our incoming mail comes through a Linux-based mail relayer, while our
outgoing goes from the IMS through our proxy server, which also doubles as
our DNS lookup server. And no...the proxy doesn't have 5.5 installed on it.
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi there
Thank you so much for your assistance!!
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mac personal folders corrupt
See Q296142.
Geoff...
-Original Mes
After looking at his dns, I'm amazed his mail works at all.
Is your relay server a 5.5 server? It doesn't act like one, which is
probably why it does work.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Exchange
Because someone is forging your administrator SMTP address, trying to make
it look like it came from you.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR - Inbound Mail F ailure - huh?
I hav
The from you and to you is because of a bcc: Block everything from
@mortgage.. In the IMC.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR - Inbound Mail F ailure - huh?
I
See Q296142.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mac personal folders corrupt
Hi everyone
I have a user that has a MAC, using Outlook with a personal folder. The
pe
I have my mailbox designated as Administrator in IMS Administrator Mailbox
and I have all NDR sent to me.
I know it is SPAM ... but I am getting about 2 Inbound Mail Failure
messages per Minute coming into my inbox all saying Unknown recipients for
100 different addresses at msn.com and aol.com.
Are these devices going to be on your Intranet or on the Internet?
If these are Intranet only, then you could set up a secondary SMTP server
for them to send their messages to and give that server permission to relay
through your Exchange box...
Just a thought.
Joe Pochedley
"In the end, if you
None that I know of, besides the scenario I just gave you.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Moore, Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hiding mailboxes from GAL, but not containers in Address Book
vie w
Hi everyone
I have a user that has a MAC, using Outlook with a personal folder. The
personal folder has become corrupt. I know there is a tool for fixing the
file in a PC environment, but does any know about a sucvh a tool for a MAC
OS??
Thanks
Russell
__
Your right, you can still send to a hidden mailbox, but when you compose a
message and try to select a hidden user out of the GAL they are not listed
in the GAL, which if the way it is suppose to be. I'm trying to figure out
a way for it to not show in the GAL but to show up in the Containers
und
2 is certainly the cheapest solution.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
This issue has been discussed a number of times before... One of those
discussions I
This issue has been discussed a number of times before... One of those
discussions I remember was started by me... :)
http://www.mail-archive.com/exchange@ls.swynk.com/msg24081.html
And still there's no resolution or nothing from Microsoft that even admits
there's a problem.
I think Jennifer
Does anyone have any other ideas/suggestions as to a workaround on this
issue?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trouble with forestprep
On the screen I can only enter a p
Hide the mailbox. You can still send to the SMTP address.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Moore, Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hiding mailboxes from GAL, but not containers in Address Book vie w
I ne
Hide the mailbox. You can still send to the SMTP address.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Brett Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hide user from GAL but not from Container - Twisted :-)
Hi all,
Exchang
Turn on relaying, but require authentication. Hopefully, the wireless devices can
authenticate.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMAP and Relaying issues
We are currently
Fires up Lil Kim CD...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
How Many Licks to the Center of a Tootsie-Pop?
-Original Message-
What do your event logs say?
-Original Message-
From: James Twigger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 Maintenance Never Stops Running
I am having trouble with the Maintenance Routine that runs on Exchange
I am having trouble with the Maintenance Routine that runs on Exchange
Server 5.5. It has been set to run at the default off times of the night.
However, once it starts, it never stops in the morning. This, in turn
appears to use up all the system processing time and even stop outlook web
acces
We are currently looking into a wireless solution that will utilize IMAP4. We
currently have open relaying shut off on our SMTP Server. The devices are not able to
send email via the SMTP server with it shut off. The devices don't have static IP
addresses so I can't add them to the allowed m
What about a reverse lookup PTR record. Maybe that's what you need.
Thank you,
Alex Gonzalez
Senior System Administrator
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 ext. 4914
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discu
Hi list,
I am trying to enable secure email communication with Exchange and Outlook. Using the
German versions of W2K and E2K it is some kind of hard to find the English terms. Hope
you are able to understand it anyway.
What I want to
--
Outlook users shall be able to sign and encr
Hi all,
Exchange 5.5
I'm trying to hide Consultants from our GAL list without hiding them
completely from other containers. If you hide from address book the
mailbox is completely hidden.
The big man wants consultants to not show up in the root of the GAL
because sometimes users select the ent
I am having a problem where the Exchange Server 5.5 maintenance routine
never stops running. It is scheduled for the default setting during off
hours of the night. If I let it start, it will continually run, never
ceasing to stop. The problem comes into play because this consumes all
the proces
I need to hide a mailbox from the GAL (The root of the GAL) but need to be
able to drill down into containers and still select the mailbox in the
address book view.
Any ideas on how to do this?
If I hide from address book it hides it from GAL and any containers
contained within
I have
Jennifer,
I hate to argue, but that statement is incorrect. Exchange 5.5 SP4 does in
fact send e-mail to a domain, if no mx record exists. I know this because
one of our admins sends e-mail to his personal mail server from work all the
time. His domain name is hopeless.nu and his mail is locat
How Many Licks to the Center of a Tootsie-Pop?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Natkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
How many A records are in the DNS.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [m
Discovered on production servers, then proven in the lab.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
how'd you discover this?
find it in the lab?
a cursory check of the usu
How many A records are in the DNS.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
how'd you discover this?
find it in the lab?
a cursory check of the usual resources against the
The problem is with Norton Antivirus for Exchange 2.xxx
If you delete from the server (such as in OWA) everything is just fine. If you delete
a bunch of items with attachments from a client outlook dies. Something about the
timeout for deletion is not long enough for norton to grab the attach
create a CR or PF, grant "User" role to sender's NT acct
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Non-reply email
Exch55sp4. What's the simpliest way to setup a user to be able to send
how'd you discover this?
find it in the lab?
a cursory check of the usual resources against the likely keywords reveals
no mention of this item.
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I believe a "553" NDR means you goofed-up some part of the address
formatting (i.e., added a space, used something other than the "@" sign, et
cetera).
-Original Message-
From: Welton, Gene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subje
Wonderful. I have never seen that stipulation. Whoda thunk?
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
Yes, which is the only reason we upgraded our relay servers rec
Yes, which is the only reason we upgraded our relay servers recently.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
Interesting. I have never heard that before. 5.5 requires
Multiple domains. All connect to one server for OWA and it does FE for
all the servers across various domains across the country.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA
This will work ... Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Non-reply email
Send from an account with the reply address is the SMTP address of a
distribution list/group
Send from an account with the reply address is the SMTP address of a
distribution list/group with no members.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brady, James
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Look at your IIS settings and add the domain name to it, so they are not
prompted to enter a domain, unless you have multiple domains.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subj
Use Delivery Restrictions tab on the mailbox Properties page.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
> --
> From: Brady, James
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:50
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Non-reply email
>
> Exch55sp4. Wha
Yeah, that will work. But for mass mailings, I was wondering if there was a
more server sided solution that didn't issue an NDR or require deleting the
replies.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussi
Make a rule that automatically deletes all mail that's delivered to the
Inbox?
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Non-reply email
Exch55sp4. What's the simpliest way to setup a u
Exch55sp4. What's the simpliest way to setup a user to be able to send
email that they don't want to receive replies (ie like a one way thing).
Thanks ... Jim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Arc
Look at your IIS settings and add the domain name to it, so they are not
prompted to enter a domain, unless you have multiple domains.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subj
Ah, yes, Ex2KSP3 on W2KSP3. Did all that, set the policies under
Recipient Policies, set the options on the Mailbox Management tab of the
server, then started Mailbox Manager. Being unfamiliar with what was
supposed to happen when I started Mailbox Manager, I 'accidentally'
started it multiple t
Yes I can telnet to their mail server. I used their A record and could
telnet to it.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
Perhaps their server is trying to do a reve
Interesting. I have never heard that before. 5.5 requires an mx record?
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
5.5 requires an mx record to send mail. This i
The RFC has everything to do with it.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record ?
Thanks Jennifer. I too was wondering what the RFC would have to do with
this.
So basically
Thanks Jennifer. I too was wondering what the RFC would have to do with
this.
So basically I have to inform the organization to put in an MX record in
their DNS or no Exchange 5.5. server will be able to send them email ?
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
You should either reconsider your decision to have port 137 opened or
install the latest Microsoft Security patch:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur
ity/bulletin/MS02-045.asp
Quote from NT Bugtraq:
It was bad enough in theory, but now a script-tot friendl
If you know how to write code, you can.
Just my $.02 US
Back to test the latest version of my DNS RBL blocking script for the
Windows 2000 SMTP Service ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 6:28 PM
> To: Exchan
Perhaps their server is trying to do a reverse lookup on you and its
failing.
Can you manually telnet to their mail server from yours?
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No MX Record
5.5 requires an mx record to send mail. This is not RFC behavior IMO. E2k
does not require it and uses the "a" record if an "mx" record is not
present.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
thanks Andy
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook forms/sendas
Q231174
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 2
Hmm. I have a very similar situation except that my organization
doesn't run any firewalls, VPNs, ISA, or any other type of security
except for what is on each individual server and I still have this same
issue.
What makes my work workstation act differently towards my Exchange 2000
server the
I did look up the RFC...and am soliciting a response from this list since it
wasn't much help in resolving my problem.
Here is an excerpt from the RFC that doesn't apply to my Exchange server :
The lookup first attempts to locate an MX record associated with the name.
If a CNAME record is found in
No you cannot.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: custom NDR?
OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in both/either 5.5 or 2k can
you make custom NDR's? or change the te
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
