it not
been for Bill East replying to your post, I wouldn't have known this thread
exists.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error
Actually the name optonline.net
As best as I can guess, the remote server is complaining that the format of
your message does not conform to the format it expects, which would be a
user at a local host in the recipient's domain. The other half of the
message is that it's not a gateway, so it will not pass on what appears to
be a
I have seen misleading 550 errors if Reverse DNS to your domain is not
correct. If the IP address of your SMTP relay/server resolves to
mail.domain.com, but the SMTP server/relay actually claims to be a
different host name, then you can get a 550 error.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).
Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that
server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or
more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the
basic SMTP
Exchange server?
Any AV on the exchange server?
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments
I encountered a strange behaviour with Outlook 2000.
I
What AV is running on the Exchange server? I've noticed some small delays
on mail with attachments since installing ScanMail but its not too
bad...Have you considered using WinZip or something on all those files?
That might help...
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL
I have seen this behavior with several AV software packages (Groupshield,
Grousphield 2000, NAV, and Trend. What I have seen happen is that the AV
software takes more time depending on the size of the message. At times I
have had to double click on an attachment multiple times before it will
, just on general principles.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange 550 error
It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).
Domain.com is not a local host
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of East, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error
As best as I can guess, the remote server is complaining that the format of
your message does not conform
Of Public Folder:
Exchange
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error
I have seen misleading 550 errors if Reverse DNS to your domain is not
correct. If the IP address of your SMTP relay/server resolves to
mail.domain.com
Thanks. That's a good idea
-Original Message-
From: Dolphin, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments
What AV is running on the Exchange server? I've noticed some small
Norton Anti Virus for MS Exchange running on Exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments
Exchange server?
Any AV
Thanks. That's good to know.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments
I have seen this behavior with several AV software packages
The antivirus is scanning the attachment.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour with multiple attachments
Norton Anti Virus for MS Exchange running on Exchange
). Any suggestions on how to use the info in rfc821 to
determine what the issue is and why it is sporadic? Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re
: RE: Strange 550 error
...no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole.
Maybe you just answered your own question.
Have you checked the RBL's to see if your listed? Have you been spamming
this domain to death? With a domain name like optonline.net, I'd be tempted
to drop you
: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error
Chris - Thanks for the info - looks like it could be an MX issue as the MX
record for the customer points to oldcustomername.com not
newcustomername.com (although both names are still valid). FYI
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error
Telnet to port 25 and run the SMTP commands is the simple way to send
commands and read replies one
The present moment is all we have control of, on a good day. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error
Charles -
I fully agree
Subject: Re: Strange 550 error
It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).
Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that
server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or
more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using
-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error
Jim -
The customer is not on optonline.net, is not listed at
ordb.org, there has
not been any spamming coming from this domain from
Outlook 2k will block some types of attachments.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:36 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Strange attachment problem
Subject: Strange attachment problem
Hi all,
Have her uncheck the option to send to that recipient using rich text.
On 1/22/03 3:35, Rob Hackney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, have searched archives/ technet and done a google but no joy...
I have a user who is using Outlook98 on our exch 2k server
She has been complaining that a
, the recipient doesn't get attachment.
I've checked all the mailbox restrictions and they are all set as
default.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 January 2003 14:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange attachment problem
Outlook 2k
I think were the problem begins is when a user replies to a particular
message and somehow the smtp address is stripped and the
/O=DOMAIN/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE
GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=4b2343a9-eaac9ea5-8725686c-62c10b is replaced. I
caught this one again this morning and sure enough, in the
Thanks Ed. You are correct with x.500. Basically instead of the smtp
address appearing in the users properties, I get the following
replacement: /O=DOMAIN/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE
GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=3F8933DF-5DD39F94-87256657-7AECCF
We do not have an exh 5.5 connector; but do have a notes
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 December 2002 12:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange NDRs
Thanks Ed. You are correct with x.500. Basically instead of the smtp
address appearing in the users properties, I get the following
replacement: /O=DOMAIN/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE
GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN
technological solutions to
behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Kevin Cobb
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 5:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange NDRs
Thanks Ed. You are correct with x.500. Basically
I think you're talking about an X.500 address, no? The one with
slashes?
Are you running a mixed site (Exchange 5.5 and 2000) with connection
agreements?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original
From EventId.net
Event ID: 13008
Source MSExchange Pop3 Interface
Type Error
Description A FormatMessage operation for message 0x80040115 failed.
Returning NULL.
Comments Adrian Grigorof: Suggested action:
1. Apply sp3
2. Remove antivrus software, then apply sp3 and then reinstall
Have a look for a hidden mailbox called hidden by jjones 12/6/02
It could be that whoever (or whatever if it is an automated job) bcc'ed the
email to this hidden mailbox, that appears to have restrictions on the size
of emails it can receive.
In the past I have hidden mailboxes and restricted
Guys, hidden by jjones 12/6/02 is what he typed in there I think to
hide the users display name. That isn't the actual text of the error
-Original Message-
From: Brown, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 5:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 12 December 2002 2:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange NDR
Guys, hidden by jjones 12/6/02 is what he typed in there I think to hide
the users display name. That isn't the actual text
Ah... little light goes on
A clear example of why obfuscating data when asking for help tends to cause
problems.
- Original Message -
From: Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:24 AM
Subject: RE: Strange NDR
Actually what happens is that when I type in the e-mail address that
generated the NDR the alt-K it underlines it. The user with this address
exists at a different company with a different mail server of what type is
unknown to me. Here at my company there are very few users and I already
have the
I'll assume 5.5; in Exchange Administrator View:Hidden Recipients.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange NDR
Actually what happens is that when I type in the e-mail address
Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange NDR
You could use logging to see if the user is sending such mails. Anyway it
will tell you if such mails are send from your network or at least via your
server.
Make sure your server is not an open relay.
If it was up to me I would check the queue's too. Spammers
assume 5.5; in Exchange Administrator View:Hidden Recipients.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange NDR
Actually what happens is that when I type in the e-mail address
If you type in the SMTP address in question and hit Alt-K, what does it
resolve to?
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Received a strange NDR today. On an e-mail sent to someone
outside
If you are talking about outlook I type it in and Alt-k and it keeps it
the same, just underlines it. It is a good mailbox for the server as he
has been getting e-mails all day. I have left him a voicemail asking him
to send me an e-mail to confirm that address is not mistyped at all.
: RE: Strange NDR
If you are talking about outlook I type it in and Alt-k and it keeps it the
same, just underlines it. It is a good mailbox for the server as he has been
getting e-mails all day. I have left him a voicemail asking him to send me
an e-mail to confirm that address is not mistyped
Has someone unwelcome hacked into your network and used your account to
do odd things at all. It does look odd.
Might be worth turning up Logging on the IMS to high, switching on
Auditing for yourself then watching the Event Log carefully for a little
while. I may be wrong, but one never knows
You could use logging to see if the user is sending such mails. Anyway it
will tell you if such mails are send from your network or at least via your
server.
Make sure your server is not an open relay.
If it was up to me I would check the queue's too. Spammers usually don't
send just one
Try rebuilding the Profile.
- Original Message -
From: Milt Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 8:18 AM
Subject: Strange Outlook Client problem
I have a user that is using Outlook 2002 with all the current patches,
Just one message or all messages? If it's one message is it an HTML
message?
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Milt Atkinson
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 5:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Outlook Client problem
Are you sure he's *truly* logged onto the network?
It sounds like he has logged on locally, using the cached credentials of
Win2k/XP.
-Original Message-
From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 5:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange
Hey Simon, you didn't go to Southampton did you?
-Original Message-
From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2002 13:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
Turns out BTOpenworld have decided to block port 25 for all home plug
and go
Erm...yes. Do I know you?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney
Sent: 29 November 2002 16:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
Hey Simon, you didn't go to Southampton did you?
-Original
Certainly do I think - I'll pmail you and take this off list..
-Original Message-
From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 November 2002 17:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
Erm...yes. Do I know you?
-Original Message-
From
It would route through your Exchange server.. Look for it there.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2002 13:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
Turns out BTOpenworld have decided to block port 25
Requests to mail.bondyweb.com on port 25 just time out.
telnet mail.bondyweb.com 25
Connecting To mail.bondyweb.com...Could not open connection to the host
on port 25: Connect failed
Check your firewall, and any other things which could cause the
appropriate port to be blocked... Check also
The server isn't answering on port 25.
C:\telnet mail.simonbond.com 25
Connecting To mail.simonbond.com...
Could not open a connection to host on port 25 : Connect failed
C:\telnet 217.39.149.150 25
Connecting To 217.39.149.150...
Could not open a connection to host on port 25 : Connect failed
No errors in the event log at _all_???
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Exchange
Can you telnet and send a message that way?
- Original Message -
From: Simon Bond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:26 AM
Subject: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
Exchange 2000, SP3, W2K SP3.
I'm afraid I can't provide a
Check to make sure that somebody didn't reconfigure the firewall to block
port 25 inbound to your Exchange server. This would explain why it was
working one day and not the next without you making any changes.
Exchange 2000, SP3, W2K SP3.
I'm afraid I can't provide a great deal of
If you have a PIX (Cisco) firewall this would be in the Mail Conduit make
sure they have it configured properly.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
You don't have Authentication set to None on these machines, perhaps?
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 3:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Strange Phenomena
Thanks to all
Have you checked your security channels, I've seen this happen sometimes
when there is domain controller problems.
-Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18. marraskuuta 2002 22:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Also ensure that their machines are domain members in the new domain, if
applicable.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Phenomena
Have you checked your security channels, I've seen this happen sometimes
when there is domain controller problems.
-Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL
They have been part of the new domain for a while. The exchange box was
the last server to be moved.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Phenomena
Also ensure
As you can tell from the flavor of the other responses, clearly you have a
credentials mismatch situation. That is, the security context that the
users have prior to launching Outlook does not match the security context
assigned to their inbox. There are lots of ways to generate this condition,
1:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange account problem - need your advice...
Open ADUC on a computer that has the ESM and at least E2K Sp2 installed.
Click on ViewAdvanced Features
Then right click on the user and choose exchange tasks
Click Remove Exchange Attributes and click
Sounds like the last Exchange 5.5 server was not correctly removed from the
site. I believe the E2K FAQ has links to the steps which should be followed
to remove the last Exchange 5.5 server.
-Original Message-
From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:THooks;keglerbrown.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04,
ADSIedit should do it.
- Original Message -
From: Hooks, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 5:18 PM
Subject: Strange account problem - need your advice...
I went from Exchange 5.5 to 2000 on a new box about 10 months ago. I
Open ADUC on a computer that has the ESM and at least E2K Sp2 installed.
Click on ViewAdvanced Features
Then right click on the user and choose exchange tasks
Click Remove Exchange Attributes and click on through. This should
clean mailbox information that pertains to the other server off of the
Check your junk mail filters
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Outlook problem
I have a strange problem with Outlook 2000. Whenever I receive any message
with the words Purchase
Which is where these messages ended up on my system. It *is* the junk mail filter.
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:cvaglica;bckpc.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outlook problem
Check your junk mail filters
Service packed? Performance Optimizer Run? Any AV Software on the server?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 6:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: strange deletion problem
I recently used exmerge to move a 5.5
On Wed August 28 2002 13:29, Andy David wrote:
Service packed? Performance Optimizer Run? Any AV Software on the server?
sp4,plus latest patches, yep, Norton Corporate Edition (edb log and chk
files are excluded,) Norton Corporate edition for Exchange in mapi mode
Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 8:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: strange deletion problem
On Wed August 28 2002 13:29, Andy David wrote:
Service packed? Performance Optimizer Run? Any AV Software on the server?
sp4,plus latest patches, yep
I had a similar problem on small business server 4.5 (which runs exch 5.5)
after a disaster recovery. I fixed it by backing up the mailbox to pst,
deleting the mailbox, then re adding it and importing the pst file.
Simon.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL
$20 says running the performance optimizer again, for the first time,
resolves it.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: strange deletion problem
On Wed August 28 2002 13
On Wed August 28 2002 16:21, Chris Scharff wrote:
$20 says running the performance optimizer again, for the first time,
resolves it.
Show Me The Money!
..
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
On Wed August 28 2002 14:33, Hayward, Simon wrote:
I had a similar problem on small business server 4.5 (which runs exch 5.5)
after a disaster recovery. I fixed it by backing up the mailbox to pst,
deleting the mailbox, then re adding it and importing the pst file.
D'oh.I had a feeling
It'll be there @ MEC.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: strange deletion problem
On Wed August 28 2002 16:21, Chris Scharff wrote:
$20 says running the performance
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATT Net: (919)960-
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: strange deletion problem
My first thought in these matters
On Wed August 28 2002 19:48, Tom.Gray wrote:
The problem is with Norton Antivirus for Exchange 2.xxx
If you delete from the server (such as in OWA) everything is just fine. If
you delete a bunch of items with attachments from a client outlook dies.
Something about the timeout for deletion
I am getting the same error. The script worked fine under Exchange 5.5.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k
I finally got around to doing
never mind. Read the rest of the thread and got it working
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k
I am getting the same error. The script worked fine under
E2k has the event service for backwards compatability... Just like the
MTA stacks and the SRS...
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:59 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Strange Event
]]
Posted At: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:53 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k
Subject: Re: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k
The Event Service in Ex2K is a near-direct-lift of the existing one in
5.5.
I had asked Robert Strong about
I didn't think the current version of Robert's script was supported on E2K..
Has that changed?
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k
available out
there?
Thanks,
-ryan-
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:35 PM
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k
Subject: RE: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error
-
From: Ryan Malayter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:16 PM
Subject: RE: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k
There's a page on the site where it lists feature requests, and under
exchange 2000 support, it says done. So I
Conversation: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k
Subject: RE: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error in Ex2k
There's a page on the site where it lists feature requests, and under
exchange 2000 support, it says done. So I don't know if it's in
version 4 or not.
As I mentioned, though
: RE: Strange Event Service/AutoAccept error
in Ex2k
There's a page on the site where it lists feature
requests, and under
exchange 2000 support, it says done. So I don't
know if it's in
version 4 or not.
As I mentioned, though, Strong's AutoAccept 4 was
working in my Ex2k
test lab
I had a similar situation. Two users had mailboxes that had over a million
items in it and the mailbox resources view of total k and # of items always
indicated 0. You need to look at the mailboxes for the two users that show
0 items.
Dot
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Paul
The mailboxes that show 0 items have 0 items. They are empty admin
mailboxes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behavior
I had a similar situation. Two users had
I have no idea what the 60GB threshold that you're talking about is, but I
do know what the deal is with the mailbox sizes. There's an issue where the
value returned for mailboxes which are greater than 4GB is 0, but Exchange
still knows their 'true' size and sorts them accordingly in the
Nope. Give a high enough number, the value reported in the GUI is 0, but the
sort order tells the real story.
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Paul
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 2/1/2002 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: Strange behavior
The mailboxes that show 0 items have 0 items. They are empty
There's no such thing as a 60GB threshold. Myself, I would look at
the network.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
sigh Please don't go there...
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange ...
All
It seems strange to me that with the amount of knowledge about
exchange that is
But, of course, this reminds me: When will [EMAIL PROTECTED] be removed
from this list?
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange ...
sigh Please don't go
You must be new. We all noticed that long ago, that's why it's in the
archives so many times. :)
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange ...
All
It seems
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange ...
Many of us are stuck with a managerial decision on the OOO to leave it
enabled.
It would be nice if it was controllable on a per-mailbox basis. It's
especially useful when using layoffs to have it notify recipients that these
people no longer work here
m
bad way...
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange ...
Mine is enabled. Have you ever once seen it Richard?
There's a good way and a bad way to manage
All of these users share the same SMTP namespace? I'd answer the question,
and propose a workaround but that'd take away from Mr. Woodruff's ability to
show just how ineffectual I am. Plus I might throw in a bit of my own
typical posting style and we'd hate for anyone else to think I was a
FAQ
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)
I've started getting some strange Outbound messages to Postmaster. Please
take a look. It appears
]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Outbound Messages (Postmaster)
FAQ
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Outbound Messages
101 - 200 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
