Title: Message
i'd
have to admit that is a good rule
another quick question
i have
managed to finally get our backup server to see the exchange box, and is backing
up the "Microsoft Exchange Directory" & "Microsoft Exchange Information
Store".
i have
also got the option to backup "Mic
Aww, How sweet!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Changing legacyExchangeDN on a user account
Take the high road, David, and don't validate those kind of posts by
respond
Title: Message
While
it is also in the FAQ's... Most of the professionals here shun
BLB's...
-Original Message-From: John Sparrow
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:08
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote
backup
i'd
have to admit
I have a situation where I need to extend the schema in exchange to add a field
that will include the PIN number of users blackberries. However, I want this
field to only be seen by certain folks - can this be done by restricting access
to that field by creating a security group and adding folks
Title: Message
I'm
removing Innoculate for Exchange 5.5 tonight in order to install Antigen.
It would make sense to me to stop the Info store before I attempt an un-install.
There is no reference to this in any CA literature or support. Anyone care to
voice an opinion? Thanks.
Steve
List Cha
Title: Message
Sounds
like a good plan - and backups!
-Original Message-From: Stephen J.
Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002
7:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing
InnoculatIT for Exchange
I'm
removing Innoculate for Exchang
Title: Message
Won't
hurt, but I don't think I had to.
-Original Message-From: Andy David
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 9:01
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Removing
InnoculatIT for Exchange
Sounds like a good plan - and backups!
Title: Message
I
don't think it is necessary (and a reboot may be required
anyway).
-Original Message-From: Stephen J.
Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002
4:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Removing
InnoculatIT for Exchange
I'm
r
There is a great list to ask this question at www.activedir.org.
Don't let the frightening FrontPage theme fool you.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 5:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Schema and Security Group Que
Presently, the NT4.0 SBS is the primary DC for domain XX and the 2000
server is the DC for domain YY
When I'm finished, the old 2000 server will remain the DC for domain YY
and the new 2000 server with exchange 5.5 will be just another server in
domain YY.
For licensing and hardware limitation r
Sounds like an interesting program. Who makes it ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Allowing access for
Hi guys,
I've got an add-in program that removes duplicates from
Free utility called click yes will do this for you. You can find this and
other utilities at Slipstick.
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in c
Your right in that there are not many users (~ 20). The Exmerge sounds
like the tool I need.
Right now there are only 2 servers, in 2 DIFFERENT domains due to
someones incompetence. The existing 2k server is a DC with Active
directory. I am taking the 4.0 SBS to 2k server to be a member serve
Title: Message
Pine
Agent
-Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002
12:23To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Wanted:
Plain text email client
Yes
something other than that, because I want to only be able to receive pla
I believe this is possible. This is specified on the Advanced Permissions
page of the OU the users are in. You may have to specify it in multiple
OU's depending on how you have your AD structured.
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 0
Title: Message
First
of all, it's "neither I nor Martey Boy "said"" You'd better work on
your MCP for Huked on Fonics.
Second
of all, who is Martey. Emmanuel seems to be the person who started this
thread.
-Original Message-From: David N. Precht
[mailto:[EMAI
Yeah go with the exmerge. It works with 5.5 or 2000 so it really doesn't
matter, I thought you were upgrading to e2k. But exmerge is the safest
way to do it. In Exmerge there's actually a one step process that you
could try if you have admin permissions on both boxes and servers.
Otherwise do the
Couldn't it be defined as a universal security group and than propagated
downward through the AD? Does that make sense?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Subject: RE
Title: Message
pegasus maybe?
www.pmail.com
Thanks,
-Chris-
IT Director
Sundowner
Interiors
-Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002
1:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Wanted:
Plain text email client
Hi
I don't think so. It looks like the OU is the only place you can specify
security on specific properties of the User object. You can use the SG to
accumulate the users you want to grant the permission to, but I think
granting permissions to that SG needs to be done in the OU.
> -Original Me
After doing a little more checking, it looks like only specific properties
of the User object are available even at the OU. You can specify security
on all the properties at the individual user object level, but I don't think
you want to do that. I suspect the properties that you can set securit
There is little difference between the "MAC" Outlook client and the "PC" Outlook
client. Sounds like a typical excuse to get his own way...
-Original Message-
From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 5:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: "
Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is
locked. We have a user who's mail is being forwarded to another mailbox
outside of our network. His messages then automatically go to his deleted
items folder. Since these messages are unread, when purging his deleted
items, ev
Thanks for the insight.. Hmmm, professors, wanting to get their own way?!?
Hmmm, it's a thought.
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:32
>To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: "Trail" for mail popped and routed
>
>
>
>T
Change the rule to mark items read. Then delete
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange dilemma
Interesting dilemma here and the answer may be obvious but my brain is
locked. We
Have this user install:
http://www.microgarden.com/outlooktools/index.htm
Then your redheaded stepchildren (whatever that means) won't know they
are being neglected.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Adm
It sounds like maybe you are using an Outlook rule to forward his email.
How about instead created a "Special Recipient" of his external address on
your exchange server, and then in the exchange server administrator entry
for this guy, on the "Delivery Options" tag, make the Special Recipient the
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma
1. Why is it forwarded?
2. Change the delete rule on the mailbox.
3. What's wrong with red heads? I personally think they have more fun than blonds...
Sherry Abercrombie
Data Center Administration Team
Information Technology
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly j
Sorry Sherry, nothing personal. I cannot find in the rules where I can
change the mail to mark as read or that would be my solution. The forwarding
story is too long to type here.
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monda
Title: Message
It
depends on your resources pal. Do you have the space on your Exchange
server to have Deleted Item Retention turned on? If you do have it turned
on, then BLB's are really not necessary. If you cannot have DIRT turned
on, then BLB's will give you an option to restore a mai
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma
They will not get this if this user is the
alternate recipient and do not have it go to the mailbox. I am curious as to why
you would have all mail go off-domain. That sounds dangerous
- Original Message -
From:
Abercrombie,
Sherry
To: MS-Exch
Title: Message
That's
why I said "Most Professionals" :P
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie,
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:52
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: remote
backup
It
depends on your resources pal. Do you h
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma
I now
have Exchange 5.5 on a 2000 server. When I upgrade the domain to 2000, will
there be any issues with this exchange setup. Will Exchange 5.5
interact/effect/monkey wrench any thing in the 2000 Active
Directory?
Thanks,
Nick
List Charter and FAQ at:
http:
Actually, there are several big differences:
1. Mac Outlook cannot search LDAP directories.
2. Mac Outlook cannot do POP3/IMAP.
3. Mac Outlook cannot drag and drop items between folders.
4. Mac Outlook cannot assign tasks.
! -Original Message-
! From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
the specific difference my user is complaining about was the inability to
import contacts.
Is that different in mac and PC outlook ?
>-Original Message-
>From: Hemang C. Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:12
>To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>Subject: RE: "Tra
Why not just create a Custom Recipient? No mailbox, no e-mail to delete.
---
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
California State University Dominguez Hills
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:34 AM
> To: MS-E
Importing into Mac Outlook is pretty limited. You can import from a .pab,
Schedule+ or a .csv. That's it.
! -Original Message-
! From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
! Sent: July 01, 2002 09:21
! To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
! Subject: RE: "Trail" for mail popped and routed
!
!
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma
Thanks, redheads can be a bit touchy at times:) I hate forwarding mail to another domain. I only do it when I'm forced to and then it's the proverbial "kicking & screaming & digging my heels into the floor" scenario before I'll do it. Are you doing the forwarding
I'm with Ken here. If they don't need to access mail internally, then give
them a CR and you're done. I do this all the time (something like 1000 CR's
here). Otherwise you can create a CR and assign it as the alternative
recipient for this persons mailbox. That way the message would get delivered
Title: Message
I'll
be in that category next week.I better be there by next week, or I'll be an
Exchange Admin who's server has quit due to reaching the 5.5 standard 16GB limit
on her priv.edb.
Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficien
Ok, that helps. Thanks for clearing this up for me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Subject: RE: Schema and Security Group Question
I don't think so. It looks l
A mailbox rule and it is also a custom recipient.
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
Thanks, r
Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes on
sabbatical or off campus for a while but will come back to their office. If
their primary e-mail account is on another server then I just use a Custom
Recipient.
Ken
---
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
Ca
No OWA?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Ugh. I only do it this way temporarily. For example when someone goes
on sabbatical or off campus for a while but will
Agreed but we have a need for someone (clerical) to monitor this person's
calendar so all messages other than calendar items get forwarded and
deleted. All calendar items go into their mailbox here so that the
person(clerical) here can make appts, etc.
-Original Message-
Yea, that too but a lot of people don't like OWA on Exchange 5.5. I'm
hoping OWA on Exchange 2000 will take care of that.
---
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
California State University Dominguez Hills
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but using internal
Calendar? Too weird.
---
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
California State University Dominguez Hills
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 200
I wanted to apologize to all those who were on the OWA SSL thread a few
weeks ago.
My contribution was that you can force SSL without a cert, but I discovered
today that I was wrong. I used to run OWA on my web server, which has a
cert, although not exclusively for OWA. When I installed my new Ex
Exactly, you big fat* weirdo Bill!
* this in no way related to the physical state of being "fat" or "gordo". I
have no way of knowing whether you are actually obese, nor do I care.
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Leyba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Are you going to the MEC?
If you are, that's a lot of beer you're buying.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA Apology
I wanted to apologize to all those who were on the OWA
You shouldn't have any issues after an initial upgrade, as long as
everything stays Exchange 5.5. If you don't use the registry hack to force
the PDC to emulate an NT4 domain, you'll need to reboot the server after the
upgrade to get it's Kerberos authentication set up properly. If you don't
it
Luckily, you prefer Coors Lite, so it wont cost him that much.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA Apology
Are you going to the MEC?
If you are, that's a lot of beer you're
Long story
-Original Message-
From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
OK, I'm confused. They are using an outside mailbox but us
Don't you owe me like 30 of those things now? Why not combine that into a 12
pack of Sam Adams or Shiner Bock and get it over with.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA Apology
L
You know if it weren't for [l]users and half-wit psuedo sysadmins* this job
wouldn't be half bad.
*I'm talking about here not anyone on this list.
---
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
California State University Dominguez Hills
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Beckett [
Heck, I owe beer and apologies to just about everybody on this list and the
others.
How about I buy you a six-quack and we call it even?
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA Ap
Not a sysadmin*
* Just in case that was a reference
-Original Message-
From: Ken Leyba [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
You know if it we
Actually, I am not even sure who you are, so you get jack!! *wink
I was a contributer to that thread, not the creator, so my apology was not
to whoever was right, but the poor soul I may have confused.
- Original Message -
From: "Schwartz, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin
me either*
* Just in case that was a reference
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Beckett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:51 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Not a sysadmin*
* Just in case that was a reference
-
Nope, talking about where I'm at.
---
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator
California State University Dominguez Hills
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:52 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exc
You can keep your ducks up in NY.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA Apology
Heck, I owe beer and apologies to just about everybody on this list and the
others.
How about I buy
OK. I'll settle for a bottle of Jack Daniels.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OWA Apology
Actually, I am not even sure who you are, so you get jack!! *wink
I was a contr
Title: RE: OWA Apology
I'm the poor soul that started the thread and I was confused to begin with.
Apology accepted (though not needed). I appreciated everyone's help.
Now, if I had known there was a possibility of free beer...
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Matthew
Funny? I thought it was hilarious!
Aside from forgetting to type "unsubscribe", did you have anything useful in
your email that you were "about to hit send" on?
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 5:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
The "High Road"??? Which road is that? I like to take the road less and
most traveled myself... Which do you prefer?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Changing legacyExch
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma
Okay Bill, here's an idea for you. Loose the mailbox rule to forward email, setup a custom recipient in Exchange admin, set this persons mailbox properties to send to BOTH the custom recipient & mailbox on Exchange. Messages get delivered to where they want them, m
Title: Message
You
will need to move ldap in ex55 from 389 to another port. Using the ADC to auto
populate will help you manage mailboxes from AD Users
-Original Message-From: Nickolaos
Fotopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002
12:06 PMTo: MS-Exchang
How about using a hammer for the sinking in part?
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
Okay Bill
Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has
greater effectiveness...
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
How about using a hammer for t
Title: RE: OWA Apology
I
write a monthly column for our company newsletter on computer issues. We're
not a computer company and our user base is a bit uneducated, so I try to
write in basic, naive user terms. This month's column will cover Klez. Since
Klez seems to be as much a
I personally prefer Ball Peen
- Original Message -
From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Hammer good, but only if 16oz or more... I find the sledge hammer has
greater eff
Yeah I like ball peen as well. Ok actually I just like saying Ball peen.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Re: Exchange dilemm
Title: RE: OWA Apology
Your users actually read things that you write that
is more than 5 lines, is in Times New Roman, and is not HTML based? I send these
emails out to try and educate my users and I can not get them to read
them!!
In an effort to better serve t
Heh, yeah that is a cool word...heh heh
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Beckett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Yeah I like ball peen as well. Ok actually I just like saying Ball
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma
Plan for sysamdin/exchadmin stress relief after dealing with HMUs to comply with official OSHA stress relief standards:
1. Take piece of foam that is approx 6x5 and at least 3 inches thick (Note, the thicker the foam the better the results will be)
2. Take 4 pi
10 pound tweaking tool.
The DEC engineers used to carry around a rubber mallet weighted with sand
that was their tweaking tool.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
H
Ahh yes, otherwise known as the "persuader".
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
10 pound tweaking to
Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Beckett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Ahh yes, otherwise known as the "persuader"
Title: RE: OWA Apology
I
concur with your sentiments... I really like your format, it's a shame
people don't take the time to read... I send Virus Warnings, even to
employees home addresses that I know, I try to setup short training sessions on
specific topics I get "dumb-user" questions a
Only certain parts of me weigh ten pounds...
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange dilemma
Jim, you only weigh 10 pounds? Wow, I thought Spudd Webb retired
- Origi
Lucky for you there is only one of them.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Only certain parts of me weigh ten pounds...
-Original Message-
From: Matt
Title: RE: OWA Apology
Thanks Matthew. I just sent out an email to my users with your
column attached. I get emails asking me about it and why they are getting
it. So this is really helpful. Thanks you!
paul green seattle
-Original Message-From: Desiree Herrmann
[mailto:[EM
Hmm, egos can weight that much?
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange dilemma
Only certain parts of me weigh ten
Title: RE: Exchange dilemma
I
concur, this is exactly what I do, and I don't think I've seen it so just so you
don't irritate anyone with outside addresses coming up in your Global Address
List, in the Advanced Tab of the Mailbox Properties Hide the Custom Recipient
you create from the Addre
Only when they have absorbed alcohol. And I'd tell you that my ego is much
larger than that, but modesty is one of my best qualities.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange di
Use the Schwartz, Luke.
Spaceballs - 1987 - Mel Brooks
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange dilemma
Only certain parts of me weigh ten pounds...
-Original Message--
Title: RE: OWA Apology
You stripped my company info right?
- Original Message -
From:
Paul Green
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:03 PM
Subject: RE: Klez article
Thanks Matthew. I just sent out an email to my users with your
column
Title: Message
Or
check out:
http://www.williamlogan.org/FreewareIndex/EMailClients.html
or
http://www.tinyapps.org/internet.html
-Original Message-From: Chris Peden
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002
4:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Wanted:
Title: Message
Oh
yeah, I always hide the custom recipient. Thanks for bringing that point
up Desiree.
Sherry Abercrombie
Data Center Administration
Team Information
Technology "With sufficient
thrust, pigs fly just fine."
-Original Message-From: Desiree Herrmann
[mailto
Title: Message
Hey,
just want to apologize for calling it "Special Recipient" a few zillion posts
ago, hope I didn't confuse anyone, and yes, it is good to hide
it.
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002
15:26To: MS-E
Thank you!
- Mark W. Harrison
Support Specialist
Genesistems, Inc. - Computer and Telephone Systems
Celebrating Our 25th Year of Custom Systems Integration
(585) 475-9180 x 210
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: RE: Klez article
Thanks for the kind words.
Answering Matthew's point, I've pretty much given up on group emails. The column I write is in print, in the regular company rag. We use fancy fonts and flashy pictures. What's interesting is that I get twice the response from the blue-colla
but the archives are a bit overgrown to weed right now.
I have about 5 mailboxes that I still need to move to my new server. Every
one of them gets "stuck" when I do a move mailbox. I tried exmerge, and it
gets stuck too.
To get this resolved, I was considering recreating the mailboxes on the ne
what about just opening the mailbox up in outlook, then backing it up to PST rather
than using exmerge? then just import than back to the new server... does that work?
or does the entire pst creating process (no matter which method) crap the bed all the
time?
Paul
-Original Message-
Turn off the antivirus?
W
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Gr I know we have gone over this
but the archives are a bit overgrown to weed right now.
I have about 5 ma
Background:
We recently split off as a new company. The old company used Exchange 5.5. We
created a new Exchange 2000 org (different org name) and migrated everyone over a
weekend using MailMig and Exmerge when necessary.
Problem:
People with reoccurring meetings do not have access as meeting
Apologies for the thread hijack - I forgot to rename the subject.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Background:
We recently split off as a new company. The old company used Exchange 5.5. We
created a new Exchange 2000 org (different org name) and migrated everyone over a
weekend using MailMig and Exmerge when necessary.
Problem:
People with reoccurring meetings do not have access as meeting
It is FINALLY taking a Move Mailbox on some of these guys I had left. I
rebooted 3 times, and verified that all MS Exch services started up (some
just stopped starting on startup) and verified that AV was off.
I have moved 2 so far, but it is freaking slow. I am not sure what is going
on, but
Configuration:
Windows 2000 Server
SP2
Exchange 2000
SP2
Certificate
installed.
If a user tries to
see the OWA default page they get the page cannot be displayed message, this is
something that started to happen a couple days ago, usually they are able to go
to this unsecured page and
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
