Just a heads up to everyone.. today is the last day of support for 8.2. It
will not be receiving any more security updates from this point forward.
--
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
Online Security Resource Book; http://linsec.ca/
lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 08:54, Vincent Danen wrote:
Just a heads up to everyone.. today is the last day of support for 8.2. It
will not be receiving any more security updates from this point forward.
trumpet
da dada da dada . da dada da dada da dada
/trumpet
*grin*
Want to buy
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 20:15, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 08:54, Vincent Danen wrote:
Just a heads up to everyone.. today is the last day of support for 8.2. It
will not be receiving any more security updates from this point forward.
trumpet
da dada da dada . da
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:35:19 + David Whiting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[06/Mar/2003:07:17:05 +] StartListening: Unable to bind socket -
Cannot assign requested address.
So, something is stopping it from getting the address it wants. I also
noticed that named wasn't happy either:
see
On Thursday 06 March 2003 02:56 am, David Whiting wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 01:27:43PM +, Anne Wilson wrote:
It looks okay to me (i.e. no garbage characters, but it could be
misconfigured without me having a clue)
NETWORKING=yes
FORWARD_IPV4=false
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:51:52AM -0500, Pierre Fortin wrote:
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:35:19 + David Whiting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[06/Mar/2003:07:17:05 +] StartListening: Unable to bind socket -
Cannot assign requested address.
So, something is stopping it from getting the
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:51:52AM -0500, Pierre Fortin wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cups]# service named status
rndc: connection to remote host closed
This may indicate that the remote server is using an older version of
the command protocol, this host is not authorized to connect,
or the
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 10:03, David Whiting wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:51:52AM -0500, Pierre Fortin wrote:
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:35:19 + David Whiting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[06/Mar/2003:07:17:05 +] StartListening: Unable to bind socket -
Cannot assign requested
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:17:02AM -0500, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
Dave:
Check your mail settings -- you have two To entries:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED], hence the double
postings.
-- cmg
Oh, sorry! I only see one so didn't know this was happening...still
learning. I'll
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 11:30:40PM -0800, Alan wrote:
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 01:12, David Whiting wrote:
Hi,
I've just upgraded from 8.2 to 9.0 (just as everyone else is getting exited
about 9.1 :-) and have a printing problem. msec_find ran this morning
and now cups is unable to bind
On Wednesday 05 Mar 2003 1:48 pm, David Whiting wrote:
I get this message in /var/log/messages though. Any chance it is
related?
[alert] httpd: Could not determine the server's fully qualified domain
name, using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName
I don't know whether it's related or not, but have you
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:13:19AM +, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 05 Mar 2003 1:48 pm, David Whiting wrote:
I get this message in /var/log/messages though. Any chance it is
related?
[alert] httpd: Could not determine the server's fully qualified domain
name, using 127.0.0.1 for
On Wednesday 05 Mar 2003 3:08 pm, David Whiting wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:13:19AM +, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 05 Mar 2003 1:48 pm, David Whiting wrote:
I get this message in /var/log/messages though. Any chance it is
related?
[alert] httpd: Could not determine
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:48:36 + David Whiting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 11:30:40PM -0800, Alan wrote:
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 01:12, David Whiting wrote:
Hi,
I've just upgraded from 8.2 to 9.0 (just as everyone else is getting
exited about 9.1 :-) and have a
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 09:48, David Whiting wrote:
I get this message in /var/log/messages though. Any chance it is
related?
[alert] httpd: Could not determine the server's fully qualified domain
name, using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName
If not, I'll worry about this one another day.
It
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 09:27, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 05 Mar 2003 3:08 pm, David Whiting wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:13:19AM +, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 05 Mar 2003 1:48 pm, David Whiting wrote:
I get this message in /var/log/messages though. Any chance it is
Welcome to the hell of 9.0 on a laptop... just for starters, I've removed
shorewall and msec from mine. Reliability is so bad (I don't have the HD
space to install more than one distro, and won't install 9.0 on any other
system I own or support) that I'm lucky to go a week without
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 10:13:50AM -0400, Adolfo Bello wrote:
It shows a DNS problem that might be related to your printing problem.
It is not resolving the server name and it defaulting it to IP
127.0.0.1. Is the printer a local or network printer? Is it attached to
the server whose name
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:51:57AM -0500, Pierre Fortin wrote:
That said, have you used suspend/resume? That's the worst offender for
me... so bad that I just shutdown/reboot instead... with suspend/resume,
I lose sound, printer, and looking at a hard lockup within an hour or
so...
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 01:27:43PM +, Anne Wilson wrote:
It looks okay to me (i.e. no garbage characters, but it could be
misconfigured without me having a clue)
NETWORKING=yes
FORWARD_IPV4=false
DHCP_HOSTNAME=ganymede
HOSTNAME=ganymede
DOMAINNAME=ammp.net
Hi,
I've just upgraded from 8.2 to 9.0 (just as everyone else is getting exited
about 9.1 :-) and have a printing problem. msec_find ran this morning
and now cups is unable to bind to socket 631. I am not sure if this is
a coincidence but I remember seeing previous posts about woes with msec.
I
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 01:12, David Whiting wrote:
Hi,
I've just upgraded from 8.2 to 9.0 (just as everyone else is getting exited
about 9.1 :-) and have a printing problem. msec_find ran this morning
and now cups is unable to bind to socket 631. I am not sure if this is
a coincidence but
how do you know it is the cds and not the reader?
On Saturday 09 November 2002 12:15 am, dfox wrote:
Somebody scribbled about [expert] 8.2 cd's
Has anyone else on here come across defected 8.2 cd's..
I came across a set yesterday when I purchased them at staples.
Hmm. You may be better off
On Saturday 09 November 2002 12:06 pm, ET wrote:
how do you know it is the cds and not the reader?
Because I tried more than 1 cd reader and did the same with the others as
well...
Harold
On Saturday 09 November 2002 12:15 am, dfox wrote:
Somebody scribbled about [expert] 8.2 cd's
Has
Somebody scribbled about [expert] 8.2 cd's
Has anyone else on here come across defected 8.2 cd's..
I came across a set yesterday when I purchased them at staples.
Hmm. You may be better off getting them at cheapbytes.com, they are
pretty inexpensive. Might just be that a few of the 8.2 cds were
Has anyone else on here come across defected 8.2 cd's..
I came across a set yesterday when I purchased them at staples.
it stops in the middle of the boot.img being very dissapointed of not having
the 8.2 standard version.
I'm not able to afford the powerpack version and no broadband to dowload
Working is clear, defective is elusive.
Have you tried making a boot floppy diskette?
If the contents will copy to your hard disk, you could try a hard disk
install.
This is also a time to find Linux friends in your area, It is likely at least
one could help you set up a network install.
Jim
http://www.cheapbytes.com/
Jim Tarvid wrote:
Working is clear, defective is elusive.
Have you tried making a boot floppy diskette?
If the contents will copy to your hard disk, you could try a hard disk
install.
This is also a time to find Linux friends in your area, It is likely at least
I have used Mandrake from version 7.1 and have never had problems installing.
I have used this box with 8.0 and 8.1 with great success. Over the last few
weeks I have tried version 8.2 and cannot get it to work reliably. Many times
it fails durning the install wether I do graphical or text.
I have used Mandrake from version 7.1 and have never had problems installing.
I have used this box with 8.0 and 8.1 with great success. Over the last few
weeks I have tried version 8.2 and cannot get it to work reliably. Many times
it fails durning the install wether I do graphical or text.
so what does (as root, in a text console, without the quotes)
cat /proc/interrupts say and can you disable apic in bios?
Unfortunately I am now running Mandrake 8.1 as I could not keep 8.2
functioning.
ACPI has been disabled in the BIOS already. A habit from when I ran BeOS.
John
John Wheat wrote on Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:07:33PM -0700 :
so what does (as root, in a text console, without the quotes)
cat /proc/interrupts say and can you disable apic in bios?
ACPI has been disabled in the BIOS already. A habit from when I ran BeOS.
Not acpi, apic (Advanced
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 10:42 pm, you wrote:
John Wheat wrote on Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:07:33PM -0700 :
so what does (as root, in a text console, without the quotes)
cat /proc/interrupts say and can you disable apic in bios?
ACPI has been disabled in the BIOS already. A habit
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 19:42, you wrote:
John Wheat wrote on Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:07:33PM -0700 :
so what does (as root, in a text console, without the quotes)
cat /proc/interrupts say and can you disable apic in bios?
ACPI has been disabled in the BIOS already. A habit from
I have used Mandrake from version 7.1 and have never had problems installing.
I have used this box with 8.0 and 8.1 with great success. Over the last few
weeks I have tried version 8.2 and cannot get it to work reliably. Many times
it fails durning the install wether I do graphical or text.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recertify drives if I have any doubts.
What do you mean by recertify -- is this some official test, or some
testing that you do? Is if for CDs or HDs or both?
PS: I assume if you disable DMA in the BIOS, then the drives do not use
DMA and hence, access is slower?
Trying to install 8.2 on a system with 500Mhz Celeron/192MB/20GB. Here
are the consistent problems:
During install, at least one package fails.
Disk 2 is not accepted, even though it takes just fine on other
computers.
On first boot, I'll get the first L in lilo and then a repeated 2
digit
Trying to install 8.2 on a system with 500Mhz Celeron/192MB/20GB. Here
are the consistent problems:
During install, at least one package fails.
Disk 2 is not accepted, even though it takes just fine on other
computers.
On first boot, I'll get the first L in lilo and then a repeated 2
I'm using 8.2 with the smp kernel (Tyan S2466 2xAthlon MP1600+) and a Matrox
G450 for two heads and Voodoo3 PCI for the third head.
If I use menudrake to add a program, not only do I immediately drop to the
dumbed down menu, I lose displays :0.1 and :0.2 after logging back in and
the system
Installing 8.2, and everything goes great until I'm configuring X.
I installed from the same disks on the same machine a while ago, and
everything kosher that time.
I set all parameters, then go to test the X settings, and I get the
following:
could not open default font 'fixed'
try to change
Installing 8.2, and everything goes great until I'm configuring X. I
installed from the same disks on the same machine a while ago, and
everything kosher that time.
I set all parameters, then go to test the X settings, and I get the
following:
1) Send hardware info on your system
2)
Thanks, but too late, I performed another fresh re-install, and it
worked this time.
How would I turn off font services during an install?
Ken
On Fri, 2002-07-05 at 16:44, Jason Guidry wrote:
Installing 8.2, and everything goes great until I'm configuring X. I
installed from the same
Thanks, but too late, I performed another fresh re-install, and it
worked this time.
hey, can't complain with that.
How would I turn off font services during an install?
it may only be available in expert mode, but the installer gives you a
chance to turn off some of the services that you
Mandrake 8.2 has a default security setting that leaves users' home
directories world readable. I just read that you can enter other user's
home directories and subdirectories and read the files. The Mandrake
msec level by default choice is Standard. If you chmod each user's home
dir to 700,
700 is fine as long as you don't want your users to have webpages. If you
don't plan to allow them to have a website (or no one uses it but
yourself), then you can have it set to 700. If you have the user as a
member in the apache group, and have the directory owned by the apache
group, then
Go into /usr/share/msec and edit the perm.3 file
/home/* to whatever permissions you like, 700 for what you are looking to
do... or alternatively, use the higher security setting in the mandrake
control center although using the Mandrake control center will change
permissions other than your
I found the solution on deja.
To install 8.2 on the Shuttle FV25 you need to first
disable IDE Prefech in the BIOS setup.
After I did that 8.2 installed without any problems.
I don't know why the IDE prefech setting was causing
the install to lockup.
Robert
--- Robert Barry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm trying to install Mandrake 8.2 on a Shuttle FV25
motherboard. I'm using a FTP install. All goes well
until the graphical install tries to detect IDE
devices. At that point my computer locks up. Because
it locks up I can't figure out what is causing the
lock up.
Here is my system:
Here is some additional info from the Shuttle site:
VIA VT8606T(PN133T) / VT82C686B Chipset
Socket 370, Supports Intel FCPGA Pentium III /Intel
FCPGA2 Pentium III-Tualatin / Celeron /
Celeron-Tualatin / VIA C3
Two 168-pin SDR DIMM PC100/PC133 SDR DIMM
Onboard Savage 2D/3D Graphics Engine
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 12:41, Alfredo Cole wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi:
I have now LM 8.1 PowerPack, and 8.2 DE. Is it now safe to use any of
these on an IBM ThinkPad i1250? I still can not understand why I can
use SuSE 7.2 and not LM 8.x.
Thank you.
I
Curios on this one. Is it possible that LM-sensors which shouldn't be
run with a thinkpad regardless of distribution, being confused with LM
as in Linux-Mandrake. Although I don't know what the LM in LM_sensors
stands for this is for sure something you don't want to run on an IBM
thinkpad.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was actually running version 7.2 and very happy with it, except for
minor problems with my graphics card, which forced me to boot windows
first, and then Mandrake. So, I asked on this list if I could upgrade
to version 8.0, and civilme clearly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi:
I have now LM 8.1 PowerPack, and 8.2 DE. Is it now safe to use any of
these on an IBM ThinkPad i1250? I still can not understand why I can
use SuSE 7.2 and not LM 8.x.
Thank you.
- --
Alfredo J. Cole
http://www.acyc.com (Accounting Systems)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi:
I just bought this scanner because I saw at sane's site that it was
supported. The lsusb command lists that it is connected to the USB
port, but xsane and kooka both say there is no scanner installed. Has
anybody gotten this scanner to work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 14 May 2002 8:33 pm, you wrote:
Hi:
I just bought this scanner because I saw at sane's site that it was
supported. The lsusb command lists that it is connected to the USB
port, but xsane and kooka both say there is no scanner
I am really looking for the correct place to send bug reports. Can
someone please direct me to the correct place for this.
I recently installed Mandrake 8.2 and my second ide dvd drive was
recognised and configured except the scsi emulation was missed. I had to
add it to the append=devfs= ...
On Friday 10 May 2002 10:07 am, Keith Bambery wrote:
I am really looking for the correct place to send bug reports. Can
someone please direct me to the correct place for this.
I recently installed Mandrake 8.2 and my second ide dvd drive was
recognised and configured except the scsi
Keith Bambery wrote:
I am really looking for the correct place to send bug reports. Can
someone please direct me to the correct place for this.
I recently installed Mandrake 8.2 and my second ide dvd drive was
recognised and configured except the scsi emulation was missed. I had
to add
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 14:55, Gary Dunn wrote:
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 20:36, Alan wrote:
On Friday 07 November 2036 03:21 am, Al Niessner wrote:
I have Mandrake 8.2 up and running on a twin P3 desktop and now my
laptop. The desktop went without a hitch because the disk was erased and
On Friday 07 November 2036 03:21 am, Al Niessner wrote:
I have Mandrake 8.2 up and running on a twin P3 desktop and now my
laptop. The desktop went without a hitch because the disk was erased and
full installation was done. My laptop was much more difficult. To start
with, I had to use the
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 20:36, Alan wrote:
On Friday 07 November 2036 03:21 am, Al Niessner wrote:
I have Mandrake 8.2 up and running on a twin P3 desktop and now my
laptop. The desktop went without a hitch because the disk was erased and
full installation was done. My laptop was much more
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:36:57 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But Damian,
1) With other filemanager doesn't happen
yep, i did some testing lately and it seems konqueror is the buggiest of them all.
i even found ways to make it display wrong icons for directories.
2) If were true, is
Damian G wrote:
i know that's not too much, but in windoze i couldn't get a third of that..
Anyway this Floppy issue is not a Linux problem but a KDE (Konqeuror) one.
so i read a very interesting thread about filemanagers and ended up
getting to know filerunner... Konq went straight to the
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 16:47:27 -0600
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damian G wrote:
i know that's not too much, but in windoze i couldn't get a third of that..
Anyway this Floppy issue is not a Linux problem but a KDE (Konqeuror) one.
so i read a very interesting thread about
Damian G wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 16:47:27 -0600
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fwiw, I have run Konq, I hated it. I tried filerunner Found it
overly complex. Civilme *Bless his little heart* Suggested Krusader.
Its on the cd's you get. Wonderful program, no bugs that
Damian G wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:03:04 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mentioned this probably bug of 8.2 in the crashtesters list, but I
have the feeling that not enought attention has been given. Other
crashtesters have tryed with the same badly results.
Try to copy files
I mentioned this probably bug of 8.2 in the crashtesters list, but I
have the feeling that not enought attention has been given. Other
crashtesters have tryed with the same badly results.
Try to copy files from the harddrive to a floppy using konqueror. You
can do it with just a
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:03:04 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mentioned this probably bug of 8.2 in the crashtesters list, but I
have the feeling that not enought attention has been given. Other
crashtesters have tryed with the same badly results.
Try to copy files from the harddrive
Em Qua, 2002-04-24 às 16:03, Damian G escreveu:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:03:04 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mentioned this probably bug of 8.2 in the crashtesters list, but I
have the feeling that not enought attention has been given. Other
crashtesters have tryed with the same
But Damian,
1) With other filemanager doesn't happen
2) If were true, is linux an stable system
if a floppy with some errors can hung it?
Francisco Alcaraz
Murcia (Spain)
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
It fails after Lilo is loaded. After the boot loader screen is loaded (and
you have the chance to select Linux-Secure, Linux, Failsafe) when
Linux-Secure is selected it gets about this far:
Loading Linux-Secure...
and then the system reboots.
Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
Hi all,
I have an older machine that I use as a firewall, it is a P166 with 64MB ram and a
6Gig HD. I am trying to upgrade it from SNF7.2 to SNF8.2. I installed MDK 8.2 with
the minimum install as suggested from the mailing lists and it installs with no
problems but on
It fails after Lilo is loaded. After the boot loader screen is loaded (and
you have the chance to select Linux-Secure, Linux, Failsafe) when
Linux-Secure is selected it gets about this far:
Loading Linux-Secure...
and then the system reboots.
Ralph
Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
Hi all,
I have an older machine that I use as a firewall, it is a P166 with 64MB ram and a
6Gig HD. I am trying to upgrade it from SNF7.2 to SNF8.2. snip
I can find no info anywhere on SNF8.2 and I'm interested in building a
firewall soon.
1st question, where is
Jason Guidry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
Hi all,
I have an older machine that I use as a firewall, it is a P166 with 64MB ram and a
6Gig HD. I am trying to upgrade it from SNF7.2 to SNF8.2. snip
I can find no info anywhere on SNF8.2 and I'm interested in building a
Jason Guidry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
Hi all,
I have an older machine that I use as a firewall, it is a P166 with 64MB ram and a
6Gig HD. I am trying to upgrade it from SNF7.2 to SNF8.2. snip
I can find no info anywhere on SNF8.2 and I'm interested in building a
Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
Jason Guidry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
Hi all,
I have an older machine that I use as a firewall, it is a P166 with 64MB ram and a
6Gig HD. I am trying to upgrade it from SNF7.2 to SNF8.2. snip
I can find no info anywhere on SNF8.2 and I'm
People have suggested that my problem may be memory-size related, but 1) non-laptop
16MB didn't
have this problem, 2)I would presume when the installation script starts, it checks
the amount of
the available memory, and no warning appeared on screen nor in logs.
We want to have the same linux
Actually computers are a mistery!
Do you remember my problem in a computer that with 8.2 didn't recognize
a ps2 wheel mouse?; it had also problem with lilo to change anything:
error: image not found.
Whell, today I decided to do an actuallization as expert but not
selecting new packages; I
I know this should be a certified linux compatible computer.
IT install fine, it detects the matrox card, the sound. But the nic is
a diferent story. Drakconf just does cant see the ethernet card.
lspci cant find it either.
I know that it is a 3c905c, and that it worked with windows
This may help: When I did an upgrade from 7.2 to 8.1, my nic
suddenly stopped working - for no apparent reason. The symptoms
were similar to what you describe. I tried all sorts of things,
including pulling my hair out, but nothing worked.
Eventually I removed the card from the box, had a
Dear friends,
I am having problems to install 8.2 in a computer that runed 8.0 without
problems:
Pentium III 1Ghz, 256 Mb Ram; keyboard Microsoft USB, mouse ps2 whell
Microsoft.
Installation: no mouse; if I have conected both, the Microsoft whell ps2
and other serial mouse it start with the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear friends,
I am having problems to install 8.2 in a computer that runed 8.0 without
problems:
Pentium III 1Ghz, 256 Mb Ram; keyboard Microsoft USB, mouse ps2 whell
Microsoft.
Installation: no mouse; if I have conected both, the Microsoft whell ps2
and other
Larry
First of all I try the installation with this ps2 wheel mouse attached
to the computer and no mouse appeared in the installation and of course
not option to install it.
Secondly I try an installation with two mice attached, one serial and
the mentioned ps2. The serial appeared in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Larry
First of all I try the installation with this ps2 wheel mouse attached
to the computer and no mouse appeared in the installation and of course
not option to install it.
Secondly I try an installation with two mice attached, one serial and
the mentioned
I wonder if you are having an interrupt conflict of some sort that didn't show
up before? Can you try moving some stuff around to free up that interrupt?
Just a guess.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear friends,
I am having problems to install 8.2 in a computer that runed 8.0 without
problems:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 16:03:57 -0800, J. Craig Woods wrote:
George, your fstab lines for mounting cdrom, cdrom2 (and floppy,
although you say it is working) look suspicious. They are in fact
telling the os to mount none, and this seems to be the error msg you
are getting too (smart errror
hi george
if you want to use supermount, you might as well use
supermount to modify the /etc/fstab for you.
# supermount -i enable
the above command would help you correct the entries
on /etc/fstab.
hth
dianne
--- George Czerw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 16:03:57 -0800, J.
On Sun, 31 Mar 2002 08:03:06 -0800, Dianne Marie Montesa wrote:
hi george
if you want to use supermount, you might as well use
supermount to modify the /etc/fstab for you.
# supermount -i enable
the above command would help you correct the entries
on /etc/fstab.
I don't know what happed. But after several reboots, I decided to delete all desktop
icons for removable devices and then recreate them as user.
Now each one of them works as it should! Go figure
Thanks everyone for your help.
George
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
I did an upgrade from 8.0 to 8.1 to a Cooker 8.2 and recently to the final
8.2. While the supermount is working with the floppy drive, as a user I
get the following error when I try to read either of my CD-R or CD-RW
drives:
Could not mount device.
The reported error was:
mount: according to
George Czerw wrote:
I did an upgrade from 8.0 to 8.1 to a Cooker 8.2 and recently to the final
8.2. While the supermount is working with the floppy drive, as a user I
get the following error when I try to read either of my CD-R or CD-RW
drives:
Could not mount device.
The reported
--- Ric Tibbetts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
YEA! The RicMan is happy again :-)
Aw.. I'm most always happy, an da Linux supporter
in arenas that you
wouldn't believe! Sometimes I just drink a bit too
much coffee. ;)
heh! dont blame it on coffee ... i love coffee and
frankly, i am hurt by
Just a quick one.
I installed 8.2 on my crash burn box tonight. The install went exactly
how an install should. Flawless.
So far, I can't see any large differences from 8.1, except that it runs
smoother, and some applications have newer versions, and run faster
smoother.
Exactly how a point
Ric Tibbetts wrote:
Just a quick one.
I installed 8.2 on my crash burn box tonight. The install went exactly
how an install should. Flawless.
So far, I can't see any large differences from 8.1, except that it runs
smoother, and some applications have newer versions, and run faster
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 22:28, J. Craig Woods wrote:
Ric Tibbetts wrote:
Just a quick one.
I installed 8.2 on my crash burn box tonight. The install went exactly
how an install should. Flawless.
So far, I can't see any large differences from 8.1, except that it runs
smoother, and
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 11:25:00PM -0800, David Guntner wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
I've downloaded the 8.2 ISO files and will be burning them to a CD when I
get a chance (once the 8.2 Powerpack box set is in the store, I'll be
picking that up). I'm currently running 8.1.
Hello
I was crasy enough to try to upgrade from rc1 to 8.2 (I said crasy because
all other attempts ended up in a full install). Fortunately everything
worked except for supermount. It is not working anymore. How can I fix that
manually?
Many thanks
Ed
Want to buy your Pack or
hi
i havent installed 8.2 yet. but i did have problems
with supermount before and can share my experiences
with it...1) maybe you can check if the new version of
initscripts was actually updated during your upgrade.
that rpm is where supermount command is bundled with.
2) you can also do a
Eduardo M. A. M. Mendes wrote:
Hello
I was crasy enough to try to upgrade from rc1 to 8.2 (I said crasy because
all other attempts ended up in a full install). Fortunately everything
worked except for supermount. It is not working anymore. How can I fix that
manually?
Many thanks
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
