Hello,
I am on a small internal LAN which does not use a Domain name or even
have a DNS server, well, except for the router in a way I suppose.
Anyway, I want to try to use my mailserver, simply called "localhost",
to send mail out rather than my ISP's smtp server. Mainly a learning
exercise, yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Using "sendmail" to send your email automatically will use postfix by default
on your system. Postfix understands "sendmail". As for using "localhost",
that may be fine for testing, and it will be the default if you haven't made
any changes or nam
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:25:37 -0500
Praedor Atrebates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> I haven't messed with postfix for a while but you will be able to send
> emails to individuals and newsgroups, etc, via postfix using
> "localhost" or any other name you set but you wont be able to post to
> thi
Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 22:18 schrieb JoeHill:
> Hello,
>
> I am on a small internal LAN which does not use a Domain name or even
> have a DNS server, well, except for the router in a way I suppose.
>
> Anyway, I want to try to use my mailserver, simply called "localhost",
> to send mail out rathe
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 07:18:01 +0200
Martin Fahrendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> So, you may know that your server is save, but the rest of the wold
> only may guess. And you are not able to give a guarantee. Your server
> can not get prooven while changing the IP address.
Point taken. Very go
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 06:48:07 -0500
stefmit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> I have the same setup at home (postfix for localhost, and dynamically
> assigned address), and what I found out from some receiving
> systems/ISPs was that they were rejecting my email not because of the
> membership to a
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 12:18 am, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 22:18 schrieb JoeHill:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am on a small internal LAN which does not use a Domain name or even
> > have a DNS server, well, except for the router in a way I suppose.
> >
> > Anyway, I want to try
Am Dienstag, 22. Juli 2003 13:48 schrieb stefmit:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2003 12:18 am, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> > Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 22:18 schrieb JoeHill:
> > > Hello,
> > >
...
>
> I have the same setup at home (postfix for localhost, and dynamically
> assigned address), and what I found o
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 07:08 am, JoeHill wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 06:48:07 -0500
>
> stefmit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> > I have the same setup at home (postfix for localhost, and dynamically
> > assigned address), and what I found out from some receiving
> > systems/ISPs was that they wer
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 06:28, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 22. Juli 2003 13:48 schrieb stefmit:
> > On Tuesday 22 July 2003 12:18 am, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 22:18 schrieb JoeHill:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> ...
> >
> > I have the same setup at home (postfix
Am Dienstag, 22. Juli 2003 20:56 schrieb James Sparenberg:
> On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 06:28, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 22. Juli 2003 13:48 schrieb stefmit:
> > > On Tuesday 22 July 2003 12:18 am, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> > > > Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 22:18 schrieb JoeHill:
> > > > >
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 22:04, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 22. Juli 2003 20:56 schrieb James Sparenberg:
> > On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 06:28, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 22. Juli 2003 13:48 schrieb stefmit:
> > > > On Tuesday 22 July 2003 12:18 am, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> >
Am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 07:35 schrieb James Sparenberg:
> On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 22:04, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 22. Juli 2003 20:56 schrieb James Sparenberg:
...
> > But on the other hand, if you have problems with one Mailserver how can
> > you inform the server administrator
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James
Sparenberg
> > > > I have the same setup at home (postfix for
localhost, and dynamically
> > > > assigned address), and what I found out from some
receiving
> > > > systems/ISPs was that they were reject
Am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 07:46 schrieb Frankie:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James
...
>
> Don't doubt you on this ... but if you are feeling left out
> ... I can
> send you some of what we get *grin*.
>
> James
>
> ###
Am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 08:41 schrieb Martin Fahrendorf:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 07:46 schrieb Frankie:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James
>
> ...
>
> > Don't doubt you on this ... but if you are feeling left out
> > ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin
Fahrendorf
Am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 08:41 schrieb Martin Fahrendorf:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 07:46 schrieb Frankie:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Hi Martin,
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 08:47, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
[...]
> > The main problem with amavis and postfix is a missing feature in the
> > current postfix version. You can not reject spam mails. So you lose ane
> > defence line in your battle against spam.
>
> Oh, the main problem is
Am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 09:55 schrieb Joerg Mertin:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Wednesday 23 July 2003 08:47, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > The main problem with amavis and postfix is a missing feature in the
> > > current postfix version. You can not reject spam mails. So you lose ane
> > >
Hi Martin,
thx for the hint. I might give it a try.
However - what buzzes me here is that if you use the proxy method to identify
spam - you have to get the spam anyway through it - don't you ? So - the spam
will use your bandwidth to get analyzed by the "proxy" application - and the
proxy appl
Am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 10:49 schrieb Joerg Mertin:
> Hi Martin,
>
> thx for the hint. I might give it a try.
> However - what buzzes me here is that if you use the proxy method to
> identify spam - you have to get the spam anyway through it - don't you ? So
> - the spam will use your bandwidth
rilliant though.
regards
Franki
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin
Fahrendorf
Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2003 5:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Using Postfix to send mail.
Am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 10:49 schrieb Joerg Mert
Hia there,
so - actually - the new possibility with the Proxy sounds quite interesting,
and are what I was looking for a long time now.
Does anyone has some hints as what I'd need for it (which version of Postfix
would be required), and some examples - on how to configure all that ?
Of course -
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 04:59, Joerg Mertin wrote:
> Hia there,
>
> so - actually - the new possibility with the Proxy sounds quite interesting,
> and are what I was looking for a long time now.
>
> Does anyone has some hints as what I'd need for it (which version of Postfix
> would be required),
Frankie wrote:
If the spam get rejected they know that you don't accept the
mail. It is up to
the sending server to handle the rejection.
OTOH, since spam detection mechanisms are not perfect (and black lists
based ones are evil), rejecting means you can lose good emails, while
with filtering yo
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Luca
Olivetti
Sent: Thursday, 24 July 2003 1:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Using Postfix to send mail.
Frankie wrote:
> If the spam get rejected they know that you don't accept
the
> mail. It is
ranki
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James
Sparenberg
Sent: Thursday, 24 July 2003 1:07 AM
To: Expert List
Subject: Re: [expert] Using Postfix to send mail.
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 04:59, Joerg Mertin wrote:
> Hia there,
>
> so - actually - the n
s
>
> Franki
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James
> Sparenberg
> Sent: Thursday, 24 July 2003 1:07 AM
> To: Expert List
> Subject: Re: [expert] Using Postfix to send mail.
>
> On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 04:5
r users
on "resending" or "redirecting" mail as opposed to
forwarding it
which changes the headers.
regards
Franki
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joerg
Mertin
Sent: Thursday, 24 July 2003 5:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
Am Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 19:10 schrieb Luca Olivetti:
> Frankie wrote:
> > If the spam get rejected they know that you don't accept the
> > mail. It is up to
> > the sending server to handle the rejection.
>
> OTOH, since spam detection mechanisms are not perfect (and black lists
> based ones are
gt; > -Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James
> > Sparenberg
> > Sent: Thursday, 24 July 2003 1:07 AM
> > To: Expert List
> > Subject: Re: [expert] Using Postfix to send mail.
> >
> > On W
On 23 Jul 2003 23:08:07 -0700 James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>One thing you could do.. it could be deadly if you get a lot of
> e-mail via Outhook excess. Filter for and drop all html e-mail. God
> knows it can be an extreme action, but in my case the amount of p0rn
> spam and t
32 matches
Mail list logo
