LURKING REPORTERS: More ironclad evidence of why you should not trust what
Barry tells you. Check it out with someone reliable.
Wow. You'd think Barry was asleep and dreaming the whole time Robin was posting
here.
BTW, everything I'm about to say can be found in the FFL archives.
Sre, Barry, sre. I understand why you don't want me to alert them to
your particularly egregious misrepresentations.
You seem to have deleted the part about everything I said being in the
archives. The lurking reporters are more than welcome to contact me for
specifics so they can
Wouldn't you love to see all those purported emails? Jeez, all I have to do is
say lurking reporters and Barry freaks.
LURKING REPORTERS: More ironclad evidence of why you should not trust what
Barry tells you. Check it out with someone reliable.
Just FYI, Judykins, I am in email
I wonder if this bit is addressed to Barry, who seems to claim definitive
knowledge of who is enlightened and who isn't (or wasn't, in Robin's case):
I say alleged because enlightenment does not show, and an unenlightened person
would not know how to evaluate its presence (assuming
Phrases are not knowledge, Share. Any knowledge about Raudra Rasa and Krodha
Bhava, you obtained on your own--except for the knowledge emptybill provided,
which, as you keep avoiding, was that they are are said to be instrumental in
bringing about God-realization through anger.
---In
Actually, if they accept what Barry says here, they aren't very good at
determining what is fact, what is fantasy, and what are outright lies. They
might well experience some serious cognitive dissonance if they were to look at
certain items in the FFL archives.
---In
Stop digging, Share. You're getting yourself into an increasingly deep hole.
Below, I quoted the entirety of emptybill's post--three sentences, the second
of which was the one that mentioned Raudra Rasa and Krodha Bhava in the context
of using anger as a path to God. There was almost nothing
Actually, Share did not explain things adequately, but that's a red herring
with regard to your own misrepresentations.
The lurking reporters have not seen any hypocrisy from me, nor have they
seen me say anything that was untruthful. Your claims about Robin in your
recent post were
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolitionism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolitionism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolition_of_slavery_timeline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolition_of_slavery_timeline
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
Mike, I like your
Michael, if you haven't read up on shingles, you really should. There's a
vaccine available (approved for folks 50 years old and older) that
significantly reduces the chances of a recurrence. Shingles is a huge problem
for older folks. If you ever had chicken pox, the shingles virus is in your
Learning that you and I both had been in extensive private contact with Robin
(initiated by Robin) upset Barry terribly. It made him look like a fool for his
claims that Robin had no interest in us, e.g.:
*From my point of view*, Robin barely tolerated his groupies here. He almost
never had
There wouldn't have been any arguments about forum posters if Barry's comments
about Robin in connection with the article hadn't been blatantly false.
The parallel between Robin and Cohen is interesting, though. They both went
through what sounds like a similar agonizing reappraisal of their
Ho-hum, another delusional psychotic rant from Barry. Does he enjoy living in
this ugly fantasy world he's created?
I suspect the key to it is that it enables him to project all his own flaws
onto the people he hates. The most extreme example comes at the end of this
post, where he
Um. Didn't somebody just rail against belittling and putting down as stupid
the folks one corrects?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
Mr. I'm-Enlightened-And-Thus-I-Just-Know-Things-That-You-Lesser-Beings-Don't
is showing his ignorance again. This is what he
Oh, don't be silly, feste. Of course you're protecting her, along with the rest
of the White Knights. But nobody else on FFL, as far as I can see, seems to
need such protection, even when they're being harassed (by Barry, for example)
in the most unpleasant and obsessive ways.
You have
For decades?? Share, you've known me for less than a single decade. What on
earth would lead you to think you knew what I've been doing for decades? It
couldn't be that you're taking Barry's word as gospel, could it?
I've certainly been hammering Barry for decades (or almost two), but as
Just for da record, the nature of the God of classical theism is said to be
absolutely simple:
The doctrine of divine simplicity says that God
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God is without parts. The general idea of divine
simplicity can be stated in this way: the being of God is identical to
My contribution:
* It respects other traditions and beliefs. One may disagree with the teachings
of other spiritual traditions, but one refrains from criticizing or mocking the
teachers, teachings, or practitioners.of those traditions. It's considered
extremely low-vibe to do so and not at
Oh, Lawson, I'm sure nobody would assume I had Barry in mind. He probably just
forgot to include this attribute in his own list, don't you think?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :
That's just not cool, Judy, as it automatically casts dispersions on Unc's
way of
Not a thing wrong with the idea, as far as I'm concerned, except that in the
execution, you left out any mention of respecting other spiritual
teachings/teachers/practitioners.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
Thanks for your input. As should be obvious, I'm
Nope, has nothing to do with the tactic you invented and falsely attribute to
TM supporters in that post, except insofar as the post represents your futile
and laughable attempt to slaughter the elephant.
Just as an example of how ludicrous your Big Game Hunter efforts are: In a
post to
salyavin wrote:
I wonder who these thugs are?
No, you don't.
She must have very poor reading comprehension if she thinks that the peaksters
weren't just using Barry's colourful prose as an excuse to leave.
That makes no sense, salyavin. Nobody needed an excuse to leave. They had
salyavin wrote:
LOL, you'll be crawling back up the post count in no time!
Nope, sorry to disappoint.
Barry wrote:
Whatever else may have been going on in her life (for example with her
physical health), there has clearly been no change in her mental health. She's
as insane as ever, and as compulsive as ever. And she still has that tendency
to make things up in an attempt to get the people
aryavazhi wrote, in part:
...Just remember Judy, not being in contact with the movement at all, having
had 1 1/2 TM courses in her life,
I don't really know what 1 1/2 TM courses could mean, but for the record, I
took the basic TM course, the TM-Sidhis course, the mini-SCI course, a
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
aryavazhi wrote, in part:
...Just remember Judy, not being in contact with the movement at all, having
had 1 1/2 TM courses in her life,
I don't really know what 1 1/2 TM courses could mean, but for the record, I
took the
One would think, if I were indeed petty and self-obsessed, I would welcome
emails from FFLers, and would enjoy seeing people speculate as to why I stopped
posting. But instead, I'm discouraging both.
Opsie!
And of course I should have learned by now to meekly accept it without
salyavin wrote:
I wish we could still ask Nabby but he fled to that place where having a
contrary opinion marks you out as a terrorist or something.
Actually it's or something on The Peak. And the something is someone who
has a contrary opinion.
Those here who have claimed
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
Judy is obviously a control freak - who else would try to correct the most
minute detail of other people's posts?
You have to be kidding me. If someone made a post with a bunch of factual
misrepresentations about you in an
salyavin wrote:
What I can't believe is being described as a thug simply for not sharing her
hallucination about what happened. And then having the temerity to say what I
thought. And on a discussion forum too! Bloody charming eh?
Thug as I've been using the term refers to the propensity
OK, that's it, I've said most of what I wanted to say. If anyone responds to
any of these posts, my follow-up is:
I stand by what I wrote.
Anything Barry or aryavazhi adds will most likely involve deliberate
misrepresentations, so take that into account. Others of Barry's thugs may
And now a couple from Barry. He writes:
One would think that if a person is trying to claim they left FFL for
positive reasons, they shouldn't undercut that claim by coming back every so
often to prove that she's still *just as negative as ever* and towards *the
same people as ever*
Here's a start, a twofer from salyavin at his dimwittiest:
If the peaksters want her as their queen bee I'm happy for them but it does
underline what I'm going on about as far as self awareness goes.
How about just *general* awareness of what's going on around you? I haven't
left any
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
Perhaps they were under the impression, based on what was said, these
particular persons would not return to FFL ever.
You wouldn't be referring to Jim and me, would you? Are you afraid to state
our names?
Actually if they
Before Barry and/or one or more of the Thugs decides to pile on, allow me to
point out that there is actually only one person from The Peak, Jim, who posts
here once in awhile. Doug and Steve have been posting on both forums all along.
I don't post on The Peak at all and extremely rarely on FFL
I think you must have misunderstood something I said again.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
I am sorry your memory is not what it used to be. You used to be able to pull
something up from the past in a snap.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@...
Please ignore what he says about me. He has it completely wrong.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
Serious_Richard brings up in this particular thread an important point about
privacy on FFL. From the beginning Rick has been intent on creating a
safe-space of
Oh, shut up, salyavin. You have nothing to contribute to this discussion. You
can't even get your basic *facts* straight. Where science is concerned, facts
are all-important, but the hell with the facts where *people* are concerned,
right? What intellectual integrity!
---In
P.S.: You do realize that if we're trolls, we're more highly evolved than you
are, according to Barry:
Given that scenario, and all of the classic definitions in spiritual
literature of enlightenment vs. ignorance, t'would seem that trolls are far
more highly evolved than those whose
Oh, I still stand by what I said. Not sure where you got the idea I'd dropped
it.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
I do not see why it would be necessary to understand you because that never
seems possible anyway. Nice to see you have dropped the 'I stand by what
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Barry's method, it seems to me, was similar to the way one would handle
dealing with ISIS effectively. I am all for ISIS being neutralised.
Exactly.
This is hilarious. Jim and I pop in for brief visits, leave a few posts each,
and Barry and Salyavin spring into full-on jibbering-idiot mode, slapping
together a tag-team pastiche of stupid mistakes, lies, misrepresentations, and
wildly illogical analyses.
Funniest of all, they portray
Interestingly, Nabby hasn't gotten much in the way of agreement concerning crop
circles or Creme. Yet nobody has been booted off The Peak for expressing their
disagreement.
How can this be?
It almost seems as though the only real difference between FFL and The Peak is
that the members of
Uh-huh. Let's see some names.
(Or *you* moderating?? Have you lost it completely now, or what?)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
I ran in to Rick at church this morning. Some here recently were anxiously
expressing their concern they were kicked off FFL
No, no, I meant names of the people supposedly concerned that they were kicked
off FFL.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote :
These are the currently listed mods:
http://alex.natel.net/misc/ffl_mods.jpg http://alex.natel.net/misc/ffl_mods.jpg
I don't know
More strawmen and faux naivete.
If you aren't interested in the topic, why are you commenting at length?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
I don't see there is much distinction between a distinction and a 'technical
distinction' here. Yes Rick allows
While I consider Richard a troll, I do not consider Barry, you or Jim a troll.
Barry is the very definition of a troll. Pushing buttons is just a euphemism
for trolling. Don't pretend you weren't aware of that.
Yes people left over what I would consider a stupid point.
It was the
Did you have some comment to make on what I wrote, Xeno, or were these just
some random thoughts?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
People rarely see eye to eye. Everyone here has characterised other's ideas
and behaviour in ways that that particular person
Are you having some trouble understanding my post, Xeno?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
It would appear authfriend can correctly spell 'cognitive dissonance'. You
are holding two or more contradictory beliefs and thinking everything is OK?
From: authfriend@...
Does the You are holding... refer to me? If it refers to me, you didn't
understand the post. Read it again.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
No. But you may explain to me why you think I did not.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Are
In the olden days of FFL, prior to Neo, identities were handled differently.
People's real names appeared in the headers of their posts, along with their
handles, unless they had specified when registering for Yahoo! that only their
handles be used. I did not so specify, and my real name
Seems to me we're starting right out with abuse of Doug, before he's done
anything at all.
Nobody, of course, will fall off the radar if they're banned. They can
always email Rick (or Alex, if he's still functioning in the moderator realm).
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
I believe you know what random means and how I was using it in this context.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
If thoughts are spontaneous, does that mean they are random? Might be, might
not be. How could you tell?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Actually, Rick didn't say anything about trying to determine exactly who is
disrupting Fairfield Life He simply said he might appoint a moderator
because he doesn't believe in enabling abusive behavior. Presumably once the
moderator has taken over, the abusive behavior here will no longer
I don't think I need to explain anything to you. I think if you reread what I
wrote, carefully this time--several times if necessary--you'll see why your
question was based on a misunderstanding.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
'You are holding...' was a question.
If one were to be actually honest, instead of just pretending to be, two points
would need to be made:
1. The insult wasn't really to Maharishi; it was to those who revere him. It
was said that if they had witnessed him sexually abusing a baby, they would
nevertheless continue to maintain
No, that was aryavaszhi.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, richard@... wrote :
It kind of looks like yifuxero didn't get the memo about the new moderator.
He was supposed to read the messages here BEFORE he posts his own messages.
Maybe he is trying to start anonther flame war, but we
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2015 4:12 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Peep Show
While I consider Richard a troll, I
Oopsie-Judy, correction. I wrote (addressing Barry):
In fact, when I posted for the first time in months several weeks ago, it was
to rebut aryavazhi's string of malicious falsehoods about me. I didn't say
anything to you or about you until you decided to take his side and go after me.
Actually, if you look into the real story, you'll find that what follows is one
of Barry's many elaborate fantasies.
In fact, the only person from The Peak who can be said to come over to FFL
is Jim, and he has done so only very rarely (usually when some FFL thug says
something unpleasant
You've made a strawman argument, Xeno. Jim's point, which you have not
addressed, was explicit:
The [Yahoo] guidelines are not arbitrary. They are put in place to foster
discussion, about anything. If you and Rick decide hands off, there is no
unambiguous solution to trolling on this forum.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
Flags are just symbols. Everyone knows the country has changed. I'm sure they
never would have flown it all these years if anyone thought it still
represented the pre-civil war mentality. So taking it down now because
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
Now that Judy has had a go at pretending to know something about it,
Um, I don't pretend to know anything more about the history of the
Confederate battle flag flying on statehouse grounds in SC than I've read
about. Looks like I
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak@... wrote :
(snip)
Rick, you once told me that Doug was really a great guy when I complained
about his Buck persona to you privately years ago. I'm not in a position to
know what kind of guy he is, great or otherwise, but he is so clearly
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
(snip)
Me: I never said I objected to Barry having his privileges revoked because the
reason has not been revealed to me. I object to that. If the reason was because
Barry called David Lynch an idiot for giving the Guru of
This post is almost entirely irrelevant to the current situation on FFL.
Moreover, it has quite a few inaccuracies.
There is no reason that anyone's equanimity should be deliberately tested by
trying to upset them. It may happen naturally in the course of a discussion or
argument, but
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Declaring one is going to ignore the authority figure, of course, adds up to
far more than simply talking back to the authority figure. And it has nothing
to do
I don't think he's talking about the increase in activity but rather the
increase in the number of posters, four of whom are old-timers who have shown
up since a moderator was appointed.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
What on earth is the difficulty understanding the obvious here? Turq got thrown
out because he declared he was not subject to Doug's moderation. There's no
need to have Doug explain it to us when we have the evidence of the post in
which he explicitly announced he was going to completely ignore
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
LOL, looks like Judy hasn't been paying attention either.
Unless I missed the post where Buck apologised to everyone for his blatant
abuse of power and promised not to do it again because he wormed a post about
I'm sorry you didn't understand what I wrote well enough to give meaningful
responses. (Or perhaps you just chose to indulge in more irrelevancies.)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
From: authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To:
My first send hasn't shown up. Maybe Doug has decided to hold my posts for
approval. Let's see if this second try makes it...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Sure. Your accusation today that
I do not say this. But sometimes it's obvious what state of mind a poster is
in.
salyavin was just demanding that Ann quit what he called her dumb harassment
of Xeno. How about you quit your dumb harassment of me and other TM supporters?
Or is the idea to make up for Barry's absence by
Oh, blow it out your I/O port, Curtis. I note that you don't mention the
context of *my* post, because it's embarrassing to one of your compatriots in
trying to make up in nastiness for Barry's absence. And you didn't complain
when I quoted Barry's post to you without the accompanying quote
It's none of your business what I'm doing these days. But I'll be back at it
very shortly. I've just been taking a break here.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
Some of us wonder Judy what you do with your time when you are not reviling
folks on FFL.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
(snippo)
J: Obviously he'd taken exception to something Doug had said, and everybody
knows Barry was hassling Doug about his David Lynch mistake. And both times
Sure. Your accusation today that it was dishonest of me to post the last
paragraph of Barry's post in which he declares he's going to ignore Doug
completely. That was harassment, for the reasons I've already stated.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In
He's been harassing me on a regular basis, and harassing others over on The
Peak.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
You are a bit over the top in your reaction I think J, I don't think he's
harassing you, but that would be in the mind of the receiver of the comments
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
My first send hasn't shown up. Maybe Doug has decided to hold my posts for
approval. Let's see if this second try makes it...
---In
Gimme a break. You were wondering what I was talking about. You were confused.
I unconfused you.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
i was talking to Sal not u
From: authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
You're a little confused. See my third paragraph below. All three of 'em are
doing it.
(I'm not talking about *sexual* harassment, BTW, just continued
You're a little confused. See my third paragraph below. All three of 'em are
doing it.
(I'm not talking about *sexual* harassment, BTW, just continued annoying dumb
attacks, typically gratuitous.)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
I think she was accusing
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jamesalan735@... wrote :
The responses below are some of the least rational, internally most
contradictory responses that I have come across here. How the writer
(apparently) considers these to constitute even a remotely coherent argument
(and fails to
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote :
I would certainly have to agree with you, xeno.
The question is how, or why do you respond to someone who, for a great
majority of the time, is just going for a reaction.
It is a total waste of time, for which I am guilty.
That's right, it doesn't quote 415501. You get a gold star. We don't know what
the message number was, but we do have the full text quoted in 415504.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
It wasn't quoting #415501.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@...
Seems to me likely that it wasn't the disputed post so much as your reactions
to his having told you he was moderating it that led him to delete your access,
including claiming he was insane (more than once) and in particular your
declaration that you would no longer read anything he posted nor
Let's not get confused here. It's much more closely related to a post made by
Doug (not Buck) on May 25, 2015, about the biker fight at the Twin Peaks
restaurant in Waco, Texas.
We know you're doing your best to exonerate Turqb. That tells us a lot about
who you are.
---In
I won't comment except to say I'm not surprised you find ethics and morality
meaningless. Beyond that, I don't want to use personalized invective.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
Yes, the biker event was the impetus for the current spate, but in post
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
Clearly Buck/Doug is a maniac who should NOT be allowed to go through the
files deleting posts that HE alone considers against the guidelines.
As far as we know, Doug (not Buck) hasn't deleted any posts.
HE made
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
Thanks for posting this Alex. Perhaps Buck/Doug will share the rational
rationale
here so we can understand which of his interpretation of the previously never
enforced vague Yahoo guidelines Barry violated.
I
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
Bhairitu, I'm trying to respond to your post about getting the offending
posts of Turq back from wherever they reside
You can't, they've been deleted (or some of them in that thread have been, not
all,
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
(megasnip)
The problem with FFL now is that happy grandiose state is being forced from
without rather than from within each of us, trying to create a happy
problem-free state without having to face any of the issues such as
Don't embarrass yourself, Curtis.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
What on earth is the difficulty understanding the obvious here? Turq got
thrown out because he declared he was not subject to
Hey, you were the one who said to Salyavin, Or maybe I'm confused. (See below
in red.) I was just confirming that yes, you were confused.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
You are the one confused - I was addressing Sal and something he said - try to
see a mental
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
(snip)
So far Doug has stonewalled us on his reasons for banning Barry. So some are
making up their own to cover this glaring gap.
Nope, that's a story
Yeah, pretty hard to manufacture a convincing counterargument, ain't it?
The *fact* is that what Doug wrote isn't explicit either way. But what I
outlined is the way I read it when it was first posted, and I see no reason to
change that inference just because Curtis is desperate to contrive
Nope, not gonna let you keep promoting this canard. I didn't invent any
reasons to cover a vague explanation. It was the first thing that occurred to
me when I saw Barry's post: He's going to get bounced for this.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
Me: It was
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Yeah, pretty hard to manufacture a convincing counterargument, ain't it?
Me: Keep digging Ms Doubledown...You are extending my joy.
I'll be a lot more
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
You're a little confused.
301 - 400 of 1336 matches
Mail list logo
