Am Freitag, 25. April 2008 02:50:46 schrieb Jim Lux:
>
> I believe that's what the latest versions of PowerSDR do.. they run
> the Rx continuously, and gate the audio off during Tx time. More than
If so, audio keying may be the problem.
If you want to work QSK, you want to hear the signals betwe
Jim,
Thanks for the interesting theoretical reflections. The question
remains as to why the 5k behaves the way it does in the shack. Please
see the 2nd tier responses inserted below:
On 24 Apr 2008 at 17:47, Jim Lux wrote:
> At 11:41 AM 4/24/2008, Ed W2RF wrote:
> >After the completion of tra
Without having to spend a lot of time searching back through the reflector
emails for specifics, can those of you that are using PowerSDR with Windows
Vista tell me your experiences with both the SDR-1000 and the Flex 5000A
using that operating system?
I'm considering buying another computer simi
Guenter,
The suggested operation would be that you hear both your transmitted
signal and the band between dots properly aligned, only delayed by
the latency interval. In practice the 5K doesn't do this. You might
hear the band during the start of the first keying element. Then only
pops and cr
Joel,
It boils down to this. Both the F5K and the SDR-1000 running the latest
released version of PowerSDR is fully supported under XP. The F5K is fully
supported under Vista and the SDR-1000 is also supported with a few caveats.
The caveats are:
1.) There is no Vista driver for the USB-to-pa
Dan,
Glad DDUtil is working for you.
Bob Tracy has just recently added a Digi offset setting for RTTY to the Test
Branch code. See the CAT Command tab in Setup for this feature.
73,
Steve K5FR
-Original Message-
Steve,
Thanks for the tip and the great software. I had it up and runni
Microsoft is holding firm to ending retail sales of XP at the end of
June of this year. They will allow OEMs to bundle it with "low-cost
computer systems". They have, however, promised to support XP
(releasing new bugs, eh, fixes) thru June of 2010.
As you may know, when you buy Vista you can "dow
Well maybe not.
http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9927721-7.html
Ken Simmons, K5UHF
FlexRadio Systems
Sr. Design Engineer
13091 Pond Springs Rd. #250
Austin, TX 78729
Phone: 512-535-4713
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://m
At 07:42 AM 4/25/2008, you wrote:
>Microsoft is holding firm to ending retail sales of XP at the end of
>June of this year. They will allow OEMs to bundle it with "low-cost
>computer systems". They have, however, promised to support XP
>(releasing new bugs, eh, fixes) thru June of 2010.
>
>As you m
Does anyone have experience with 64bit Vista? Is it more stable than
the 32 bit? If I use Vista, explorer has to reset itself probably 3-4
times a week and once a month I have to repair the OS from its
installation dvd once a month. It really is on the border of unusable
over here on my q6600 machi
I am using the new software with the offsets now and still have problems. Cat
to MixW direct works great.
Cat to DDutil to Commander to MixW presents problems with the offset??
Dan> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; flexradio@flex-radio.biz>
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] Sharing CAT>
At 08:16 AM 4/25/2008, Neal Campbell wrote:
>Does anyone have experience with 64bit Vista? Is it more stable than
>the 32 bit? If I use Vista, explorer has to reset itself probably 3-4
>times a week and once a month I have to repair the OS from its
>installation dvd once a month. It really is on th
MS will soon release its (so called) final release which is labeled SP3.
This has already been released to government and some commercial agencies.
As you are probably aware there are so many problems within Vista that
government agencies will not incorporate it into any networked facilities.
Even
OK, here is my final word on this topic.
PowerSDR/SDR-5000 is an outstanding performer, in my opinion. So it
is my hope that this QSK topic will be given due consideration by the
PowerSDR programming team. CW may be dying, but we CW operators are
not. Guys, don't let this deficiency go un-notic
Dave --
I wrote the iambic keying code that's used in PowerSDR. I myself am a 99% CW
op and was when I was first licensed in 1962. The Bobs N4HY and K5KDN are
superb, long-time CW ops both by profession and avocation.
I mention these things simply to emphasize that getting CW right is not an
afte
I assume that we can infer that the new SDR software architecture is taking all
of this into account as a fundamental design criterion so that a better mouse
trap is built from the ground up.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fra
Tim --
Correct.
73
Frank
AB2KT
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assume that we can infer that the new SDR software architecture is taking
> all of this into account as a fundamental design criterion so that a better
> mouse trap is built from the gro
What is so great about the Flex 5000 is that we are even having this
discussion. There is the real possibility of significant improvement, on this
area or others.With most of the other manufacturers, such a discussion
would be pointless.With the others, you are stuck with what you go
In topic Re: [Flexradio] CW QSK ability
At 11:24 AM 4/25/2008, Dave Blaschke wrote:
>OK, here is my final word on this topic.
>
>PowerSDR/SDR-5000 is an outstanding performer, in my opinion. So it
>is my hope that this QSK topic will be given due consideration by the
>PowerSDR programming team. CW
Cecil,
I don't think that it is Apple code, maybe some Unix or Linux code,
which the Apple OS is based on. I don't consider Quick Time to be very
stable... :-| Unix is much more stable, but the GUI (Graphical
User Interface) is not as user friendly or has the "Eye Candy" that
Window/A
Quoting Jerry Flanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Fri 25 Apr 2008
11:30:57 AM PDT:
> I am beginning to wonder if CW in the production software is broken
> and only we in the field notice it. Or perhaps the production version
> does not presently include features of the version used by Bob above?
Hi Jerry,
I think QSK results are highly "processor," Windows version and
associated executing apps dependent.
With flexRadio we all have to be careful about the performance of our
computer when making high end performance statements. Performance
statements are meaningless with out a the defi
At 03:35 PM 4/25/2008, Jim Lux wrote:
>Quoting Jerry Flanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Fri 25 Apr 2008
>11:30:57 AM PDT:
>
>
>>I am beginning to wonder if CW in the production software is broken
>>and only we in the field notice it. Or perhaps the production version
>>does not presently include feat
Quoting Jerry Flanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Fri 25 Apr 2008
02:04:13 PM PDT:
> At 03:35 PM 4/25/2008, Jim Lux wrote:
>> Quoting Jerry Flanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Fri 25 Apr 2008
>> 11:30:57 AM PDT:
>>
>>
>>> I am beginning to wonder if CW in the production software is broken
>>> and only
Mark,
Good info. Besides the VOX being quick, the input is balanced, but if
the shields are tied together or common there is a possibility that
noises can be introduced via the shields. Tough working with those
small connectors, but glad you got to the bottom of the problem.
73,
Dudley
WA
Hey Jerry,
You've probably noticed my post just pervious to yours. With a 3Ghz
Pentium 3D and nothing but v1.10.4 running, I had QSK to 25 Wpm. A
Pentium 3D is a bit of a dog so I bet a top end box gets 40WPM...
How about giving us your QSK performance limit? Your machine and
Windows info.
Hi Rob
You have QSK with a SDR-1000 at 25 WPM CW? Please confirm that you
can hear band activity under these conditions - maybe QSO someone
and ask him to break you as you tx - then see if you can actually hear him.
Is your SDR-1000 unmodified in respect to rx/tx switching - i.e, the
standa
I can't reproduce this result. On a 3ghz quad core, with 192khz
sample rate and cpu at 8%, sending 25wpm, I hear no usable band sound
between dots. Only pops and crackles.
73 Ed W2RF
On 25 Apr 2008 at 15:15, Robert Dennison wrote:
> Hey Jerry,
>
> You've probably noticed my post just pervious
> I'm considering buying another computer similar to the Dell I
> purchased a few months ago so one can be dedicated to the 5000A and
> the other to the SDR-1000. The same Dell I purchased a few months ago
> could be purchased with XP, now that option doesn't exist.
The Dell Store at my neighbo
The feature (as with all new features being developed) is in the
PowerSDR/branches/test part of SVN. If you are using the PowerSDR/trunk, you
will not find it there yet. The trunk is just for bug fixes to the released
version of PowerSDR and the /branches/test is where new features are vetted
Hi Ed,
I want to thank you guys for responding.
I also get all the pops and crackles and the panadapter display flashing
on and off drives me crazy, but yes I believe I could hear the 200 hz
offset solid S9 tone. Useful band noise? I doubt I would have heard a
dit or a dah!
What would be rea
there must be serious problems here...
I can get up to 7 words a minute, thats it ... I can barely make out
signals between dits..
25 wpm... no way... not here anyway..
SDR1K /w HPSDR P4 3.2 ghz 1gb pc2700
W9RAY
Ed Russell wrote:
> I can't reproduce this result. On a 3ghz quad core, with
Rember Jay,
I was listing to a solid S9 tone and new exactly what to listen for. In
my second test I could definitely here band noise between the snaps and
crackles which makes me think I could have heard a dit once and awhile.
Actually hearing a single dit on a single space is unlikely; howeve
33 matches
Mail list logo
