Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
Splitting the discussions is a great idea.
I suggest that the Experimental Group be defined to include *any*
unreleased and/or unsupported software or hardware - not just the
SVN-managed code.
For example, discussions of PowerSDR issues that use
: Saturday, June 20, 2009 7:25 AM
To: j...@3kitty.org; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
That would really be misleading to potential customers. Ddutil, VAC usage
as experimental? When I bought the Flex I was really surprised to find all
of the contortions
Re: distinguishing SVNs for Alpha code software from released versions:
Change the background color for SVNs to red or green or yellow or something
intense, and keep the boring beige for the fully released versions.
OR a large banner in a bold color at the top of the Alpha console screens
in excitement! (TM)
-Original Message-
From: Howard S. White [mailto:drpa...@kleega.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 6:25 PM
To: ger...@flex-radio.com; mnar...@comcast.net; Dave Gomberg
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
I
, 2009 7:25 AM
To: j...@3kitty.org; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
That would really be misleading to potential customers. Ddutil, VAC usage
as experimental? When I bought the Flex I was really surprised to find all
of the contortions necessary
To: j...@3kitty.org; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
That would really be misleading to potential customers. Ddutil, VAC usage as
experimental? When I bought the Flex I was really surprised to find all of
the contortions necessary to make it perform
Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of brahman...@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 8:25 AM
To: j...@3kitty.org; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
That would really
I knew you were joking.
Ed, W1PN
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Brian Lloyd brian-wb6...@lloyd.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:50 PM, Brian Lloyd wrote:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Brian Lloyd wrote:
But there is another way to think about this. Yes, it may scare someone
off but I
Phone: 512-535-4713
www.flex-radio.com
Tune in excitement! (TM)
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 8:07 PM
To: Flex reflector
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN
)
-Original Message-
From: Howard S. White [mailto:drpa...@kleega.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 6:25 PM
To: ger...@flex-radio.com; mnar...@comcast.net; Dave Gomberg
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
I do agree that for marketing purposes you
: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
Membership in the Experimental Group will be open to all FlexRadio
customers who are willing to follow the rules associated with the
privilege.
We reserve the right to restrict access to certain highly experimental SVN
branches until they are stable enough
-radio.biz
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 7:34:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
Gerald,
Sounds great to me. This makes clear the difference bwteen the experimental
SVN and the Offical Release, and allows support to focus on where it is most
needed---to get people up
My last message was not meant for the reflector. Sorry for the wasted
bandwidth.
Mark
N6SF
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives:
@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
I had to be persuaded but I believe it will benefit all of us. The use of
the test branch by people running contests and hunting vital DX or worse
yet, doing ARES work just sent shivers down my spine. It is time for a
fork
: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
Excellent point Bob.
A consideration could be made for a separate tester/coder email reflector.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Bob McGwier
Sent: Wednesday, June
On Jun 17, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Robert McGwier wrote:
I had to be persuaded but I believe it will benefit all of us.
It is certainly what I would do. Reflectors are cheap and easy to set
up. If one doesn't want to spend any effort we could certainly create
another on google-groups or
I respectfully disagree ...I don't think there should be any restrictions on
who gets to test software, if someone is savy enough to figure out how to
navigate the SVN process, they probably should be able to test the
software. The more you restrict that base of people, the less you have, and
the
At 22:38 6/17/2009, Robert McGwier wrote:
I had to be persuaded but I believe it will benefit all of us. The use of
the test branch by people running contests and hunting vital DX or worse
yet, doing ARES work just sent shivers down my spine. It is time for a
fork in the road.
IBM
It is not up to me by no means but I think simpley to select the Alpha test
group
Email reflector users, would be to only put people in it that have sent bugs to
the
Bug tracker in the last 6 months or something like that.
73's
Bret WX7Y
Other wise you have just another group of users who
, please add me to it.
Tnx to all the developers for the fabulous product.
73, de Carl N9GC (ex WCØV)
- Original Message -
From: Jesse N4BFD n4b...@gmail.com
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
I
Gerald et al,
Thanks for a great product. The Flex-3000 rekindled my interest in HF
after 30+ years in self-confinement in 2M emergency activities. My new
Flex-3000 is fantastic - even with the quick-and-dirty longwire at 15
feet that I'm using as a temporary antenna. I've worked more
That sort of models the modern amateur radio
transceiver manufacturers. You may get an
upgrade infrequently, after it has been
tested many times. We are familiar with
that process.
One group of hams are attracted to the
Flex-Radio products because of the
performance and features.
Another
...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Mike Naruta
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 3:21 PM
To: Dave Gomberg
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
That sort of models the modern amateur radio
transceiver manufacturers. You
Reflexively, I disliked the idea of quashing the SVN talk on this list.
But as I started to think about it more, it began to make sense: How
many people REALLY want to watch the sausage being made? Even open
source loving Linux users don't all want to belong to the linux-kernel
list. Some people
On 6/18/2009 4:04 PM, Peter G. Viscarola wrote:
about what needs done in the next revision of the kernel.
So... sure. Move the dev talk to another list. That'd be sensible.
But restrict who can join? I think that'd be a darn shame.
Peter
K1PGV
I would also vote no to restricting the
www.flex-radio.com
Tune in excitement! (TM)
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Peter G. Viscarola
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 4:04 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166
At 13:20 6/18/2009, Mike Naruta wrote:
What if instead of talking about SVN or alpha versions, we called it
experimental
or prototype versions?
How about truth-in-labeling and call them bug testing versions
--
Dave Gomberg, San Francisco NE5EE gomberg1 at wcf dot com
All
18, 2009 1:50 PM
To: mnar...@comcast.net; 'Dave Gomberg'
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
Mike,
I am sure we can find a happy medium that meets the interests of both
groups. We will put a lot of thought into it, taking into account all
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
Hello friends of Flex!
blip/flip fixed in SVN 3170 in the test branch. BUT THIS
HAS NOTHING TO
DO WITH THE OFFICIAL FLEX RELEASES.
Folks, I do want to really urge you to use direct email to
individuals
On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Howard S. White wrote:
I do agree that for marketing purposes you need to separate the
Support
Reflector from the Experimental Group.
There are a lot of people who do not understand the difference between
Support and Experimentaion and it is pretty obvious that
On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Brian Lloyd wrote:
But there is another way to think about this. Yes, it may scare
someone off but I can't imagine it scaring off someone who really
should buy a Flex radio. If it scares a potential buyer, maybe you
don't really want that buyer. In my
Two groups would be good. It would be easier at least for me to keep
track of what's where.
You could consider restricting membership in the 'development' list to
Flex owners.
73
Wayne
K4ELO
73,
Wayne
K4ELO
k4...@fastmail.fm
___
FlexRadio Systems
On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:50 PM, Brian Lloyd wrote:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Brian Lloyd wrote:
But there is another way to think about this. Yes, it may scare
someone off but I can't imagine it scaring off someone who really
should buy a Flex radio. If it scares a potential buyer, maybe
It has been reported that if you see the panadapter jump for normal to
flat line about every second or so.. To get out of these situation,
change the Sample rate to a different sample and then back. I've seen
this on the 3K and 5K intermittently. I can't explain why, but the
change in
Confirmed here if that means anything. Just showed up on the last test SVN
at 3167.
- Original Message -
From: Dudley Hurry jhu...@austin.rr.com
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
It has been
Hello friends of Flex!
blip/flip fixed in SVN 3170 in the test branch. BUT THIS HAS NOTHING TO
DO WITH THE OFFICIAL FLEX RELEASES.
Folks, I do want to really urge you to use direct email to individuals
involved in the coding AND the bug reporting system to report on these
branches. It
-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] All using SVN 3166 or higher
Hello friends of Flex!
blip/flip fixed in SVN 3170 in the test branch. BUT THIS HAS NOTHING TO
DO WITH THE OFFICIAL FLEX RELEASES.
Folks, I do want to really urge you to use direct email to individuals
involved in the coding AND the bug
I had to be persuaded but I believe it will benefit all of us. The use of
the test branch by people running contests and hunting vital DX or worse
yet, doing ARES work just sent shivers down my spine. It is time for a
fork in the road. One for those who like to tinker and/or have specific
38 matches
Mail list logo
