On 11/09/2009, Rainer Döbele doeb...@esteam.de wrote:
Hi Sebb,
thanks for checking our release once again but I was shocked to read about
your verdict.
However I have problems to reproduce your findings.
I have downloaded both the zip and the tar from
http://people.apache.org
On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere
franci...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere
franci...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] -1
Distribution archives are broken.
On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/09/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
...
Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for testing?
If so, then it should not be the in
On 09/09/2009, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much everyone on the previous thread for the help with the
intricacies of what goes in NOTICE and LICENSE. I think we've got the files
to a good point, but before we tag the 1.3-rc3 candidate, I'd like a sanity
check from
On 09/09/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 22:28 +0100, sebb wrote:
Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for
testing? If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in
the binary release.
We have a source and binary
On 08/09/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
Attached are draft copies of LICENSE and NOTICE files for the cassandra
project.
LICENSE is monolithic, it contains a copy of all licenses. It is meant
to replace the texts we currently keep in lib/licenses.
NOTICE contains an
On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please
see details below :
Looks OK now - the issues I raised have been fixed, thanks.
---
The artifacts are available for review at:
On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:33 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende
On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please
see details below :
Looks OK
On 03/09/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-rc1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent,
On 03/09/2009, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
All:
The Pivot community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Apache
Pivot 1.3 Release Candidate 2. We would now like to request the permission
of the Incubator PMC to publish the artifacts on the Pivot download page.
The
On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
A new RC is now available, please see details below :
---
Please review and vote on the M1-incubating release artifacts of PhotArk.
The artifacts are available for review at:
On 04/09/2009, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
The NOTICE file contains items which should not be there, i.e. Tomcat.
The servlet implementation could come from a number of places. We
originally didn't mention it in the NOTICE file, but it got caught as
something that needed to
On 04/09/2009, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
The LICENSE file does not contain the full CCA LICENSE for the Silk
icons; see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode for
the full text.
Good to know - I'll update it on the trunk. Given that we got it
On 02/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebb,
So to sum up, do we still have blocking issues left? If needed I can brew an
other rc to fix a few more of those minor issues (they are fixed
in trunk).
IMO the NOTICE file problems need to be fixed.
Thanks
On 31/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is
now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release.
So far the release has been approved by Empire-db committers, but due
to vacation time
Just noticed that (some) Incubator releases are being made from
personal directories on people (minotaur).
That does not seem right to me, but perhaps I'm being too picky?
Example:
http://incubator.apache.org/empire-db/downloads/downloads.htm
On 01/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
[inline reply]
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
The new release candidate uses exactly the same name for the artifacts
and the SVN tag.
This makes it very difficult to determine later what
On 31/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is
now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release.
So far the release has been approved by Empire-db committers, but due
to vacation time
On 01/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, just noticed that there is another version of the tutorial in
Word format (tutorial.doc).
This is stored in SVN alongside tutorial.pdf, but for some reason in
the archive the doc file is stored in one of the
On 01/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
I fixed the empire-db site download links. (might take a few hours for
the change to be propagated)
http://incubator.apache.org/empire-db/downloads/downloads.htm
Still one problem left, the md5 and sha files don't seem to have
On 31/08/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for all the reviews and feedback for the PhotArk RC2. I have
fixed all the severe and blocking issues and have produced a new RC...
Please follow the link below for the new RC details :
On 02/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, done
so we should never point to archive.apache.org from the site
You can point to archive.apache.org for archived releases, see for example:
http://tomcat.apache.org/
Download/Archives
or
On 22/08/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:16 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
Sigs and hashes OK; tgz and zip agree with each other.
However, the source archive does not agree with the SVN tag - the
versions are different in various pom.xml
for the first release
+1 for subsequent releases
Rainer
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Re: [DISCUSS] Changing poddling release voting process
-1
I try to check my podlings' releases personally, but I usually fail
where Sebb shines :). It is much easier to guide the addition of new
On 21/08/2009, Rainer Döbele doeb...@esteam.de wrote:
The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is now
looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release.
So far the release has been approved by Empire-db committers, but due to
vacation time and other
On 21/08/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/08/2009, Rainer Döbele doeb...@esteam.de wrote:
The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is now
looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release.
So far the release has been approved by Empire-db
On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
the tag is located here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/empire-db/tags/empire-db-parent-2.0.5-incubating
This is because our parent module is called empire-db-parent. Is this a
problem?
I don't have a problem
On 21/08/2009, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
There is only a combined source/binary archive, which is not standard
practise.
All other projects release a source archive; almost all also release a
separate
On 21/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
-1
AIUI, all proposed releases must be voted on by the IPMC, not just by
the podlings.
And they still would be as the only binding votes are from IPMC
members, and
On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
So sebb, what tool are you using there to come up with all those issues ;-)
Scripts to download and unpack the archives.
Scripts to check sigs and hashes.
WinMerge and
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/releases
On 21/08/2009, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:21 PM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, if we do the making best practices a graduation requirement
instead of a release requirement that might alleviate the poor mentor
issue as its easy
On 21/08/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
So sebb, what tool are you using there to come up with all those issues ;-)
Scripts to download and unpack the archives.
Scripts to check sigs and hashes.
WinMerge and
https
be possible to recreate the jars from the source archive,
without needing to go back to SVN.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:39 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
So sebb, what tool are you using there to come up with all those issues
On 21/08/2009, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/08/2009, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
There is only a combined
On 21/08/2009, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: ant elder antel...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 2:32:39 AM
Subject: Re: Making up policy on the fly
Several improvements have been suggested on
On 21/08/2009, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 10:15:44 AM
Subject: Re: Making up policy on the fly
On 21/08/2009, Joe Schaefer wrote
On 21/08/2009, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:05 AM, sebb wrote:
On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
About that assembly issue, running mvn assembly:assembly on the
assembly... I don't really think that makes sense
On 21/08/2009, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
I wrote some procedural docs for the RM role:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#glossary-release-manager
Comments/criticisms/flames welcome.
Generally agree, but not sure what you mean by the project's
On 21/08/2009, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 11:02:12 AM
Subject: Re: RM procedural docs
On 21/08/2009, Joe Schaefer wrote:
I wrote some
On 20/08/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Luciano Resendeluckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery
application including a content repository for the images, a display
piece, an access control
On 19/08/2009, Snitkovsky, Martin martin.snitkov...@hp.com wrote:
The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 0.1
The voting mail thread can be viewed at: http://tiny.cc/es4Zu
We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
release.
On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The vote is now closed with the following results:
* +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
* 0 votes: 0
* -1 votes: 0
The vote passes.
I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
in
libraries, apart from Groovy.
Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
license files and that is an OK approach
On 17/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Robert Burrell
Donkinrobertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
You can put all the licenses or references to the licences in the
LICENSE file.
AIUI this is only best practice, not normative. every
On 17/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request
On 17/08/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Given whats being said in
On 17/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
the NOTICE file looks
On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent,
On 13/08/2009, Snitkovsky, Martin martin.snitkov...@hp.com wrote:
The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 0.1
We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
release.
Podling voting thread can be viewed at http://tiny.cc/JNjGq
The
On 13/08/2009, Snitkovsky, Martin martin.snitkov...@hp.com wrote:
The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 0.1
We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
release.
Podling voting thread can be viewed at http://tiny.cc/JNjGq
The
Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 6:32 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: wink-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wink 0.1
On 06/08/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/08/2009, Snitkovsky, Martin
On 06/08/2009, Snitkovsky, Martin martin.snitkov...@hp.com wrote:
The Wink community has started the voting to release Wink 0.1.
The voting mail thread can be viewed at
On 06/08/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/08/2009, Snitkovsky, Martin martin.snitkov...@hp.com wrote:
The Wink community has started the voting to release Wink 0.1.
The voting mail thread can be viewed at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wink-dev/200908.mbox
On 04/06/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
On 4 Jun 2009, at 16:21, sebb wrote:
On 04/06/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator
was created: 23/Feb/08.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Jukka Zitting
jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins
directory tree before deployment, as they serve
I think this helps;
But last M2 location is undertags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2. This is
the last revision. Please VOTE on this.
Thanks;
--Gurkan
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent
OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API
Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Is it OK? I will correct this and create new release tag (rc3) in the
evening.
I suggest you start a new e-mail for the vote; please include the SVN
tag revision.
Thanks sebb;
-- Gurkan
2009/6/1 sebb seb
+0.
There should probably be an AL header in the file:
stocktrader/dotnet/trader_client/Trade/Global.asax
but IMO this is not a blocker. Please fix for the next release.
==
The site index.html does not appear to have a link to the license;
there is a file called license.html but it does not
+0
Two files don't have AL headers:
openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml
samples-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml
I'm not sure what these files are for.
The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins
directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose.
The
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 10:21:09 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)
+0
Two files don't have AL headers:
openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml
be able to find all the licences by checking the
LICENSE file.
See:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses
Thanks;
--- Gurkan
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 2:36
tag.
[The combination of the revision and the tag allows the files to be
uniquely identified, thus getting round the problem of the mutable
tag]
thanks;
--Gurkan
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)
Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag.
Current Tag Revision is 780496
Thanks;
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent
On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi;
OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans
Specification which is defined as JSR-299.
Proposed released artifacts are:
Plugins repository
--
On 27/05/2009, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sebb,
sebb schrieb:
The signing key for 0xF79B7715 is not in the KEYS file:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/trunk/KEYS
This must be fixed before release.
Hmm, I added it to
http://www.apache.org
The signing key for 0xF79B7715 is not in the KEYS file:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/trunk/KEYS
This must be fixed before release.
Otherwise, the hashes and sigs are OK.
tgz and zip versions of the archives agree with each other.
I assume that the SVN tag is
On 23/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar uthaiyashan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sebb,
the source archive does not have the
documentation source files. The generated site files are included
instead. [The binary archive correctly contains the generate site
files.]
I
On 22/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar uthaiyashan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sebb,
I have uploaded the Apache Stonehenge M1 release artifacts here:
http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/take3/
Sigs and hashes OK.
Binary tgz and zip archives agree with each other
On 21/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar uthaiyashan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Apache Stonehenge community has voted for the M1 release of Apache
Stonehenge. We are now asking the approval from the Incubator PMC to
publish the release.
Stonehenge is a set of example applications for
PANEKANA - apparently means security in Hawaiian.
No hits in TESS.
Google shows no hits relating to commercial enterprises.
On 19/05/2009, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Apache Community.
It seems as if our recently changed name of Apache Ki is not free from
potential naming
On 14/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar uthaiyashan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Apache Stonehenge community has voted for the M1 release of Apache
Stonehenge. We are now asking the approval from the Incubator PMC to publish
the release.
Stonehenge is a set of example applications for
On 14/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar uthaiyashan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sebb,
Thank you very much for the quick review.
See my comments inline.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar uthaiyashan...@gmail.com
On 13/05/2009, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:09 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course external dependencies - to first level at least - *ought* to
be documented to ensure the consumer knows what else is needed to use
the product
On 12/05/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
On 12 May 2009, at 00:24, sebb wrote:
Some NOTICE files start with:
=
== NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of==
== the Apache
On 12/05/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
I was reliably informed that this was discussed on the Maven list in March
2008 (subject: legal-discuss) and for binary distributions that are
created
by the war packager that contained
On 11/05/2009, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 10:43 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
There are rather a lot of LICENSE and NOTICE files dotted around the
source archive.
That's in anticipation of the future release model that Sling
On 11/05/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
or testing the release
On 11/05/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
On 11 May 2009, at 18:11, sebb wrote:
On 11/05/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator
On 09/05/2009, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache Sling community voted on and has approved a proposal to
release Apache Sling. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC
to publish the
On 07/05/2009, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
I seem to recall that someone has a script to compare PMC membership with
SVN ACLs. Is that right?
Do you mean this?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/tools/validation/authcheck.pl
What particular aspect needs
On 07/05/2009, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
I seem to recall that someone has a script to compare PMC membership
with
SVN ACLs. Is that right?
What particular aspect needs checking?
Making sure that everyone listed in committee-info.txt as on the Incubator
PMC is also
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:35 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/04/2009, Gavin ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
Hi All,
I checked out Incubator site.
Before doing any changes at all I thought I'd build
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:10 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:35 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/04/2009
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:46 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:10 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/04/2009
On 30/04/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:46 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:35 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:46 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/04/2009
On 30/04/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:35 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:46
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:43 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:35 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/04/2009
On 29/04/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Gavin ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
Hi All,
Having updated log4php status page and doing svn up on people I noticed
some
files that could do with removing.
?
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting
I think there are some problems with the archives.
The *java* archive contains a .war file which has 42 jars in the
WEB-INF/lib directory.
Some 17 or so of these are ASF files, but the rest are 3rd party files.
None of the 3rd party files are mentioned in the META-INF NOTICE and
LICENSE files.
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 Henning Schmiedehausen henn...@schmiedehausen.org:
Sorry, to bother you here, but I don't believe, that you have
On 26/04/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there are some problems with the archives.
The *java* archive contains a .war file which has 42 jars in the
WEB-INF/lib directory.
Some 17 or so of these are ASF files, but the rest are 3rd party files.
None of the 3rd party files
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Vincent Siveton
vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
How do I build this to produce
On 26/04/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 Henning Schmiedehausen henn...@schmiedehausen.org:
Sorry
On 27/04/2009, Chris Chabot chab...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:36 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The *php* archive also has the COPYING and COMMITTERS files. The
NOTICE file says 2008.
Those files are from the same source as the java archive, so when the new
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
Thank you very much for your very prompt review.
Answers to your questions below.
Shanti
sebb
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote
1301 - 1400 of 1543 matches
Mail list logo
