Re: [DISCUSS] Layout change - remove the right table

2011-10-09 Thread sebb
On 9 October 2011 13:50, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > I've not started looking at generating projects/index.xml yet. >>> >>> Reading the past mails shows me you are +1 to commit the layout >>> changes. You are already working on the next steps :-) >> >> I'm not keen on losing the RH podling li

Re: [DISCUSS] Layout change - remove the right table

2011-10-09 Thread sebb
On 10 October 2011 02:02, David Crossley wrote: > sebb wrote: >> Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> >> >>>>> I've not started looking at generating projects/index.xml yet. >> >>> >> >>> Reading the past mails shows me you are +1 t

Re: [DISCUSS] Layout change - remove the right table

2011-10-10 Thread sebb
On 10 October 2011 09:09, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:58 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 10 October 2011 02:02, David Crossley wrote: >>> sebb wrote: >>>> Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>&

Re: [DISCUSS] Layout change - remove the right table

2011-10-10 Thread sebb
On 8 October 2011 05:25, David Crossley wrote: > Donald Whytock wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > There ought to be a tapestry.html file locally; may need to generate a >> > dummy one if the original cannot be recovered (or never existed). >> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Layout change - remove the right table

2011-10-10 Thread sebb
On 10 October 2011 12:18, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:28 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 10 October 2011 09:09, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:58 AM, sebb wrote: >>>> On 10 October 2011 02:02, David Crossley wrote: >

Podling status file simplifies website maintenance

2011-10-10 Thread sebb
The podling summary status page (projects/index.html) is now generated from the file site-author/podlings.xml, rather than site-author/projects/index.xml (which has been retired) podlings.xml contains all the information that was in index.xml, but is much easier to update and process, because it c

[SITE] Split projects/index.html

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
The podling status sumnmary page currently contains details of all podlings, past and present. It's already quite long, and it is going to get longer and longer. Would it be sensible to split the page, perhaps into one page for each status? Or maybe current, graduated and other? If it's importan

Clutch blue-green background colour obscures entries

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
Airavata at http://people.apache.org/~sebb/clutch.html#clutch OK to change that? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [SITE] Split projects/index.html

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
On 11 October 2011 18:09, Donald Whytock wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:50 AM, sebb wrote: >> If it's important to have a single page that contains all the podling >> names ever used for searching purposes, then we could create a >> simplified version of podlin

New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
The new CSS changes the default setting for links, by removing underlines unless the mouse hovers over the link. However, this has broken all the internal name definitions. These now look like links - they are blue, and get underlined when hovered over. See for example [1] where the table heading

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
ll update the CSS accordingly. We can reserve changing the Anakia style in case there are complaints from other browsers. > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, sebb wrote: >> The new CSS changes the default setting for links, by removing >> underlines unless the mouse hovers over the link. &g

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
On 11 October 2011 21:40, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, sebb wrote: >> The new CSS changes the default setting for links, by removing >> underlines unless the mouse hovers over the link. >> >> However, this has broken all the internal

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
On 11 October 2011 21:48, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> Is there any reason why we should not format: >>> h2 a { >>>  text-decoration: none; >>>  color: black; >>> } >> >> Would need to be applied to etc as well. > > h2 a, h3 a, h4 a, h5 a { >  text-decoration: none; >  color: black; > } > >> It

Re: New bootstrap CSS messes up display of all internal name definitions

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
On 11 October 2011 22:03, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> h2 a, h3 a, h4 a, h5 a { >>>  text-decoration: none; >>>  color: black; >>> } >>> It would also hide links in headings (if there are any) >>> >>> Have not found a single one. >>> Besides, it would be really nasty to put links into headi

Re: Clutch blue-green background colour obscures entries

2011-10-11 Thread sebb
On 12 October 2011 03:14, David Crossley wrote: > sebb wrote: >> Clutch uses a blue-green background colour for satisfactory entries. >> >> However, many entries include clickable blue links which are not very >> distinct from the background. >> >> I suggest

Re: Clutch blue-green background colour obscures entries

2011-10-12 Thread sebb
. If this is stored on p.a.o in a personal directory, we can try different settings very quickly. > Thanks, > Christian > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:38 AM, David Crossley wrote: >> sebb wrote: >>> David Crossley wrote: >>> > sebb wrote: >&g

[SITE] Samples of site with different CSS settings

2011-10-12 Thread sebb
I've uploaded the current site to my pao directory: http://people.apache.org/~sebb/incubator/ This was created using a reworked site.vsl that creates relative links where possible, so the LH menu should work OK the directories are: current - as for existing CSS files bootstrap - css fil

Re: [SITE] Samples of site with different CSS settings

2011-10-12 Thread sebb
On 12 October 2011 13:46, sebb wrote: > I've uploaded the current site to my pao directory: > > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/incubator/ > > This was created using a reworked site.vsl that creates relative links > where possible, so the LH menu should work OK > > the

Re: Format of email

2011-10-12 Thread sebb
On 12 October 2011 16:50, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > sebb wrote on Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 16:36:27 +0100: >> On 12 October 2011 16:23, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> > sebb wrote on Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 18:24:19 +0100: >> >> On 11 October 2011 18:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Deltacloud 0.4.1 (incubating)

2011-10-12 Thread sebb
On 12 October 2011 17:39, David Lutterkort wrote: > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 11:13 +0200, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> David, >> >> congratulations to the new release. >> >> Just a comment I cannot see the new release on the website: >> http://incubator.apache.org/deltacloud/ >> Should't it be u

Re: Interest in Apache beanshell incubation?

2011-10-12 Thread sebb
On 11 October 2011 21:34, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > (Sorry for crossposting for this time, please redirect any > response only to general@incubator) > > Hello; > > As some advocacy related to Apache OpenOffice.org, I asked > the beanshell.org guys to adopt the Apache License 2. > > Not only did Patri

Podling status summary - expand details for graduated/retired/dormant projects?

2011-10-13 Thread sebb
The graduated podling list does not make it easy to find the new home of a project. One has to click on the status page link and hope that the status page has been updated with the new TLP details. For example, Abdera does not show the new URL; ActiveMQ does. But even if the status pages were all

Re: [SITE] Samples of site with different CSS settings

2011-10-13 Thread sebb
On 13 October 2011 08:45, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:46 PM, sebb wrote: > ... >> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/incubator/ > ... >> the directories are: >> >> current - as for existing CSS files >> >&

Re: [SITE] navigation

2011-10-13 Thread sebb
On 13 October 2011 08:49, David Crossley wrote: > Here is a solution which should meet the quest for "appealing" > and also meet the quest for "usability". > > This intends to use the same colour that "bootstrap" uses > for "a:hover". > > I presume that they have used a dull variant of the link co

Re: [SITE] Samples of site with different CSS settings

2011-10-13 Thread sebb
On 13 October 2011 13:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:57 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 13 October 2011 08:45, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >>> ...I prefer the bootstrap variant with the subtler colors. >> >> Unfortunately the colours don't wor

Re: [SITE] Samples of site with different CSS settings

2011-10-13 Thread sebb
On 13 October 2011 13:54, sebb wrote: > On 13 October 2011 13:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:57 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 13 October 2011 08:45, Bertrand Delacretaz >>> wrote: >>>> ...I prefer the bootstrap variant with the su

[SITE] change to relative links + change to use id for anchors

2011-10-13 Thread sebb
I think it would be useful to use relative links where possible throughout the Incubator site. Also, by switching to using rather than will avoid having to distinguish links from anchors, at least in the Anakia-generated output. Both of these will change just about every HTML file, so I'd like

Re: Podling status summary - expand details for graduated/retired/dormant projects?

2011-10-13 Thread sebb
On 13 October 2011 16:00, Donald Whytock wrote: > So...a url attribute that takes precedence when present, otherwise the > link is derived from the podling name?  Or should the url attribute be > default-filled for all cases? No, the URL I referred to would only apply to *non-current* podlings. T

Re: Podling status summary - expand details for graduated/retired/dormant projects?

2011-10-13 Thread sebb
stylesheet. Besides, we've not agreed the new format yet. > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:19 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 13 October 2011 16:00, Donald Whytock wrote: >>> So...a url attribute that takes precedence when present, otherwise the >>> link is derived from the podl

Re: [SITE] navigation

2011-10-13 Thread sebb
On 13 October 2011 23:00, David Crossley wrote: > sebb wrote: >> David Crossley wrote: >> > >> > Here is a solution which should meet the quest for "appealing" >> > and also meet the quest for "usability". >> > >> > T

Re: [SITE] change to relative links + change to use id for anchors

2011-10-13 Thread sebb
On 14 October 2011 01:02, David Crossley wrote: > sebb wrote: >> I think it would be useful to use relative links where possible >> throughout the Incubator site. >> >> Also, by switching to using rather than > name="anchor"> will avoid having to dis

Re: Mailing list teething pains

2011-10-15 Thread sebb
On 15 October 2011 20:08, Benson Margulies wrote: > The startup of accumulo has been, from my point of view, strangely > painful for mailing list moderation. I'd like to learn something from > this for the next time around. > > Here's what I think is the relevant history: > > 1) The initial commit

Re: svn commit: r1185456 - /incubator/public/trunk/clutch.py

2011-10-18 Thread sebb
On 18 October 2011 03:02, wrote: > Author: crossley > Date: Tue Oct 18 02:02:39 2011 > New Revision: 1185456 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1185456&view=rev > Log: > Fix typo. Oops, sorry! > Modified: >    incubator/public/trunk/clutch.py > > Modified: incubator/public/trunk/clutch.p

[clutch.py] Split into data and presentation?

2011-10-18 Thread sebb
At present, clutch.py generates the output HTML directly. This means embedding HTML in the python code, which is awkward to read, and a bit more difficult to update. Would it be worth changing this so the python code only creates the raw data as several XML/HTML entities (like current.ent/dormant

Website redirects for graduated projects

2011-10-18 Thread sebb
The incubator site has an .htaccess file containing redirects for many of the graduated podlings. However, not all graduated podlings are in the file; the following are missing: abdera beehive buildr cassandra chemistry felix ftpserver httpd-cli jackrabbit jaxme juddi log4cxx log4net log4php merl

Re: Website redirects for graduated projects

2011-10-19 Thread sebb
On 19 October 2011 09:44, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin > wrote: > >>> Going by my experience running Clutch, it is mainly because >>> people do not completely follow the documentation that >>> has evolved for incubation. Not sure why. There

Re: Website redirects for graduated projects

2011-10-19 Thread sebb
On 19 October 2011 09:40, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:55 AM, David Crossley wrote: >> sebb wrote: >>> The incubator site has an .htaccess file containing redirects for many >>> of the graduated podlings. >>> >>> Howeve

Re: [clutch.py] Split into data and presentation?

2011-10-19 Thread sebb
On 19 October 2011 01:18, David Crossley wrote: > sebb wrote: >> >> At present, clutch.py generates the output HTML directly. > > To clarify for others (i know that sebb knows): > It generates the whole xml into site-author, using some > fragments of html that are hard-

Re: manage the ReportingSchedule

2011-10-20 Thread sebb
On 20 October 2011 09:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > David Crossley wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 19:00:58 +1100: >> This reporting stuff is getting harder to manually manage. >> We now have sixty (yes 60) podlings currently in incubation. >> >> Can anyone see a way to improve this process? Maybe we

Re: [VOTE] Publish Apache Sling Release

2009-05-12 Thread sebb
On 12/05/2009, Craig L Russell wrote: > > On May 12, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Brian Fox wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think it's OK to expect users to have to trawl through all the > > > NOTICE and LICENSE files to find all the required information. IMO, > > > the top-level L & N files

Re: [VOTE] Publish Apache Sling Release

2009-05-13 Thread sebb
On 13/05/2009, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:09 AM, sebb wrote: > > Of course external dependencies - to first level at least - *ought* to > > be documented to ensure the consumer knows what else is needed to use > > the product,

Re: [VOTE] Approve the M1 release of Apache Stonehenge

2009-05-14 Thread sebb
On 14/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache Stonehenge community has voted for the M1 release of Apache > Stonehenge. We are now asking the approval from the Incubator PMC to publish > the release. > > Stonehenge is a set of example applications for Service Oriented >

Re: [VOTE] Approve the M1 release of Apache Stonehenge

2009-05-14 Thread sebb
On 14/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Thank you very much for the quick review. > > See my comments inline. > > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM, sebb wrote: > > > On 14/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar > > wrot

Re: Apache JSecurity/Ki rename - please submit suggestions!

2009-05-19 Thread sebb
PANEKANA - apparently means security in Hawaiian. No hits in TESS. Google shows no hits relating to commercial enterprises. On 19/05/2009, Les Hazlewood wrote: > Hi Apache Community. > > It seems as if our recently changed name of Apache Ki is not free from > potential naming conflict problems,

Re: [VOTE] Approve the M1 release of Apache Stonehenge (Second try)

2009-05-21 Thread sebb
On 21/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache Stonehenge community has voted for the M1 release of Apache > Stonehenge. We are now asking the approval from the Incubator PMC to > publish the release. > > Stonehenge is a set of example applications for Service Oriented >

Re: [VOTE] Approve the M1 release of Apache Stonehenge (Second try)

2009-05-22 Thread sebb
On 22/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > > > >> > >> I have uploaded the Apache Stonehenge M1 release artifacts here: > >> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/take3/ > > > > Sigs and hashes OK. >

Re: [VOTE] Approve the M1 release of Apache Stonehenge (Second try)

2009-05-23 Thread sebb
On 23/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > > > >> > >> the source archive does not have the > >> > documentation source files. The generated site files are included > >> > instead. [The binary archi

Re: [VOTE] Approve Release of Apache Sling MIME type mapping support Version 2.1.0-incubator

2009-05-26 Thread sebb
The signing key for 0xF79B7715 is not in the KEYS file: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/trunk/KEYS This must be fixed before release. Otherwise, the hashes and sigs are OK. tgz and zip versions of the archives agree with each other. I assume that the SVN tag is http://svn.apac

Re: [VOTE] Approve Release of Apache Sling MIME type mapping support Version 2.1.0-incubator

2009-05-27 Thread sebb
On 27/05/2009, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > sebb schrieb: > > > The signing key for 0xF79B7715 is not in the KEYS file: > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/trunk/KEYS > > > > This must be fixed before rel

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

2009-05-30 Thread sebb
On 26/05/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi; > > OpenWebBeans will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the Web Beans > Specification which is defined as JSR-299. > > Proposed released artifacts are: > > Plugins repository > -- > > http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/st

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2

2009-05-31 Thread sebb
party licenses. Is it really necessary to put all > of these text lines into the LICENCE text? Is it really block release? > Yes, the user must be able to find all the licences by checking the LICENSE file. See: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

2009-05-31 Thread sebb
vide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. [The combination of the revision and the tag allows the files to be uniquely identified, thus getting round the problem of the mutable tag] > thanks; > > --Gurkan > > > > > > > F

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

2009-05-31 Thread sebb
ral@incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:25:14 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try) > > >>>Please provide the SVN revision which applies to the current tag. > > Current Tag Revision is 780496 > > Than

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

2009-06-01 Thread sebb
bating-M2/?pathrev=780504 > > . > > > > When I opened URL, it shows the > > > > Directory revision: 780477 (of 780556) > > Sticky revision : 780504 > > > > I think this helps; > > > > But last M2 location is undertags/openw

Re: [VOTE] CANCEL Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Second Try)

2009-06-01 Thread sebb
Apache OpenWebBeans :: WebBeans-API Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > Is it OK? I will correct this and create new release tag (rc3) in the > evening. I suggest you start a new e-mail for the vote; please include the SVN tag revision. > Thanks sebb; > >

Re: [VOTE] Approve the M1 release of Apache Stonehenge (third try)

2009-06-01 Thread sebb
+0. There should probably be an AL header in the file: stocktrader/dotnet/trader_client/Trade/Global.asax but IMO this is not a blocker. Please fix for the next release. == The site index.html does not appear to have a link to the license; there is a file called license.html but it does not se

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)

2009-06-01 Thread sebb
+0 Two files don't have AL headers: openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml samples-1.0.0-incubating-M2-site.xml I'm not sure what these files are for. The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins directory tree before deployment, as they serve no useful purpose. The l

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try)

2009-06-01 Thread sebb
sary ? > > -- Gurkan > > > > > > ____ > From: sebb > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 10:21:09 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try) > > > +0 > > Two files don't hav

Re: asc.md5 and asc.sha1 (Was: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans 1.0.0-incubating-M2(Third Try))

2009-06-02 Thread sebb
ted: 23/Feb/08. > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Jukka Zitting > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:21 PM, sebb wrote: > > > The .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files should be deleted from the plugins > > > directory tree befor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)

2009-06-04 Thread sebb
On 04/06/2009, Ian Boston wrote: > Hi, > > Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache > Shindig version 1.0-incubating. > Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations > of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial > applications.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.0 (RC4)

2009-06-04 Thread sebb
/O. > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian Boston wrote: > > > > > > On 4 Jun 2009, at 16:21, sebb wrote: > > > > On 04/06/2009, Ian Boston wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Please review and vote on appro

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wink 0.1

2009-08-06 Thread sebb
On 06/08/2009, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote: > The Wink community has started the voting to release Wink 0.1. > The voting mail thread can be viewed at > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wink-dev/200908.mbox/<2c60aa1b234ac84d8486dc6ba56275fc508a3ca...@gvw1163exb.americas.hpqcorp.ne

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wink 0.1

2009-08-06 Thread sebb
On 06/08/2009, sebb wrote: > On 06/08/2009, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote: > > The Wink community has started the voting to release Wink 0.1. > > The voting mail thread can be viewed at > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wi

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wink 0.1

2009-08-09 Thread sebb
> martin > > -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 6:32 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: wink-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Releasing Wink 0.1 > > > On 06/08/2009

Re: [VOTE] Wink Release 0.1

2009-08-13 Thread sebb
On 13/08/2009, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote: > The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 0.1 > > We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this > release. > > Podling voting thread can be viewed at http://tiny.cc/JNjGq > > The Maven staging area i

Re: [VOTE] Wink Release 0.1

2009-08-13 Thread sebb
On 13/08/2009, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote: > The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 0.1 > > We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this > release. > > Podling voting thread can be viewed at http://tiny.cc/JNjGq > > The Maven staging area i

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1

2009-08-15 Thread sebb
On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote: > The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache > Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the > Incubator PMC for this release. > > Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed, > struct

Re: Thrift release legal issues

2009-08-17 Thread sebb
On 17/08/2009, ant elder wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Robert Burrell > Donkin wrote: > > >> You can put all the licenses or references to the licences in the > >> LICENSE file. > > > > AIUI this is only best practice, not normative. every third party > > library MUST have a lic

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1

2009-08-17 Thread sebb
On 17/08/2009, ant elder wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote: > >> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache > >> Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of t

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1

2009-08-17 Thread sebb
On 17/08/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 17/08/2009, ant elder wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebb wrote: > > > > > > >> Given whats being said in the "Thrift release >

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1

2009-08-17 Thread sebb
On 17/08/2009, ant elder wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > > Hi Ant, > > > > On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > >>>

Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1

2009-08-18 Thread sebb
On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote: > > The vote is now closed with the following results: > > * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman) > * 0 votes: 0 > * -1 votes: 0 > > The vote passes. I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries in the binary re

Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1

2009-08-18 Thread sebb
On 18/08/2009, ant elder wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb wrote: > > > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans wrote: > >> > >> The vote is now closed with the following results: > >> > >> * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian

Re: Making up policy on the fly

2009-08-18 Thread sebb
On 18/08/2009, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Aug 18, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > > > > Hi Ant, > > > > I didn't intend to make up stuff on the fly, especially policy. > > > > After having been through the fine points of LICENSE vs. NOTICE so many > times, I thought the consensus was t

Re: Making up policy on the fly

2009-08-18 Thread sebb
On 19/08/2009, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Aug 18, 2009, at 4:11 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > On 18/08/2009, Ralph Goers wrote: > > > > > > > > On Aug 18, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wink 0.1 (RC-3)

2009-08-19 Thread sebb
On 19/08/2009, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote: > The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 0.1 > > The voting mail thread can be viewed at: http://tiny.cc/es4Zu > > > > We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this > release. > > > > The Maven stag

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-08-20 Thread sebb
On 20/08/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery > > application including a content repository for the images, a display > > piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. T

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing poddling release voting process

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
s. > Hence my opinion is: > -1 for the first release > +1 for subsequent releases > > Rainer > > > Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > Re: [DISCUSS] Changing poddling release voting process > > > > > -1 > > > > I try to check my podlings'

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote: > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is now > looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. > So far the release has been approved by Empire-db committers, but due to > vacation time and other circumstances the Me

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, sebb wrote: > On 21/08/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote: > > > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is now > looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. > > So far the release has been approved by Empire-d

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
a problem with the name. > Francis > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:56 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 21/08/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote: > >> > >> The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publi

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebb wrote: > > There is only a combined source/binary archive, which is not standard > practise. > > All other projects release a source archive; almost all also release a > > separate bi

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing poddling release voting process

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, ant elder wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM, sebb wrote: > > -1 > > > > AIUI, all proposed releases must be voted on by the IPMC, not just by > > the podlings. > > > > > And they still would be as the only binding votes are fro

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > So sebb, what tool are you using there to come up with all those issues ;-) Scripts to download and unpack the archives. Scripts to check sigs and hashes. WinMerge and https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/releases/compare_dirs

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing poddling release voting process

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:21 PM, ant elder wrote: > > Also, if we do the making best practices a graduation requirement > > instead of a release requirement that might alleviate the poor mentor > > issue as its easy enough to check the latest release at

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, sebb wrote: > On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > > > So sebb, what tool are you using there to come up with all those issues ;-) > > > Scripts to download and unpack the archives. > Scripts to check sigs and hashes. > > WinMerge and >

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
be possible to recreate the jars from the source archive, without needing to go back to SVN. > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:39 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >> So sebb, what tool are you using there to come up with all those issues > ;-) > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 21/08/2009, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > There is only a combined source/binary archive, which is not standard

Re: Making up policy on the fly

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Joe Schaefer wrote: > - Original Message > > > From: ant elder > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 2:32:39 AM > > Subject: Re: Making up policy on the fly > > > > Several improvements have been suggested on this thread so far, the >

Re: Making up policy on the fly

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Joe Schaefer wrote: > - Original Message > > > From: sebb > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 10:15:44 AM > > Subject: Re: Making up policy on the fly > > > > > On 21/08/2009, J

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:05 AM, sebb wrote: > > > > On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > > > > > About that assembly issue, running mvn assembly:assembly on the > > > assembly... I don't really think th

Re: RM procedural docs

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Joe Schaefer wrote: > I wrote some procedural docs for the RM role: > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#glossary-release-manager > > Comments/criticisms/flames welcome. Generally agree, but not sure what you mean by "the project's release documentatio

Re: RM procedural docs

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Joe Schaefer wrote: > - Original Message > > > From: sebb > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 11:02:12 AM > > Subject: Re: RM procedural docs > > > > > On 21/08/2009, Joe Schaefer wrote

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-08-22 Thread sebb
On 22/08/2009, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:16 PM, sebb wrote: > > Sigs and hashes OK; tgz and zip agree with each other. > > > > However, the source archive does not agree with the SVN tag - the > > versions are different in various pom.xml f

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db version 2.0.5-incubating (take 2)

2009-09-01 Thread sebb
On 31/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Hi, > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. > So far the release has been approved by Empire-db committers, but due > to vacation time and other circum

Location of Incubator releases

2009-09-01 Thread sebb
Just noticed that (some) Incubator releases are being made from personal directories on people (minotaur). That does not seem right to me, but perhaps I'm being too picky? Example: http://incubator.apache.org/empire-db/downloads/downloads.htm

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db version 2.0.5-incubating (take 2)

2009-09-01 Thread sebb
On 01/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > [inline reply] > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM, sebb wrote: > > > The new release candidate uses exactly the same name for the artifacts > > and the SVN tag. > > > > This makes it very difficult to det

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db version 2.0.5-incubating (take 2)

2009-09-01 Thread sebb
On 31/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Hi, > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. > So far the release has been approved by Empire-db committers, but due > to vacation time and other circum

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db version 2.0.5-incubating (take 2)

2009-09-01 Thread sebb
On 01/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > > Also, just noticed that there is another version of the tutorial in > > Word format (tutorial.doc). > > > > This is stored in SVN alongside tutorial.pdf, but for some reason in > > the archive the doc file is stored in one of the subdirectories,

Re: Location of Incubator releases

2009-09-01 Thread sebb
ectory and > >> then copy into position from there. > >> > >> > >> The first paragraphs shows the location of the dist directory on p.a.o > >> > >> Martijn > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Francis De &

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >