On 7 November 2011 14:48, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/7/11 3:29 PM, sebb wrote:
On 7 November 2011 09:30, Jörn Kottmannkottm...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is the SVN tag?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/opennlp/tags/opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4/
The KEYS file
On 7 November 2011 18:15, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
Links to both should be provided in the VOTE e-mails please.
The NOTICE file in the binary zip contains the following paragraph:
This product depends on Apache UIMA developed at
The Apache Software Foundation
On 12 November 2011 06:54, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I *suggest* that incubator change the procedure such that all
committers (or at least all committers within a single LDAP
group) have access to all incubator areas and that
think the committer list (currently in
asf-auth-template) belongs in podlings.xml.
I think that might be better as another file, or perhaps as a marker -
or another section - in the PPMC file.
-David
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 12
Just wanted to check what is the procedure for accepting a code donation.
A compamy that uses JMeter has produced a plugin that they would like
to give to JMeter.
I've not seen it yet, but it is apparently about 10 classes written
in-house with no external dependencies.
So what do we need (if
On 14 November 2011 11:39, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:35 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Just wanted to check what is the procedure for accepting a code donation.
A compamy that uses JMeter has produced a plugin that they would like
to give
On 14 November 2011 10:21, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP.
OpenNLP is a machine learning based toolkit for the processing of natural
language text.
OpenNLP should be used as an adjective, not a noun.
It
On 14 November 2011 19:52, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Kafka community is excited to share that RC for release of
Kafka-0.7.0-incubating has been +1'd over at kafka-user@incubator.
Please try it out and vote for the Apache Kafka 0.7.0-incubating release.
This is the
On 14 November 2011 20:17, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Nov 14, 2011, at 6:09 AM, sebb wrote:
On 14 November 2011 10:21, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP.
OpenNLP is a machine learning based
On 15 November 2011 02:12, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
That page is very misleading, and there was a long discussion of this
topic elsewhere.
Look at the example just above the requirement:
The Apache Xerces XML parsing library is easily configurable and
compliant with
On 15 November 2011 11:57, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/15/11 3:20 AM, sebb wrote:
On 15 November 2011 02:12, Benson Marguliesbimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
That page is very misleading, and there was a long discussion of this
topic elsewhere.
Look at the example just above
understand why the RAT jar is in SVN; normally one
would expect that to be an external dependency.
Thanks,
Jun
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:37 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 November 2011 19:52, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Kafka community is excited to share
On 15 November 2011 15:41, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-11-15, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
The copyright years stamped onto every incubator page should probably
be updated. For some reason, non-ascii characters are stomped when I
run the site build so I'd be really
On 15 November 2011 16:32, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-11-15, sebb wrote:
On 15 November 2011 15:41, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-11-15, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
The copyright years stamped onto every incubator page should probably
be updated
On 16 November 2011 14:32, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
On 15/11/11 03:22, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:20 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 November 2011 02:12, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
That page is very misleading, and there was a long
On 16 November 2011 20:57, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Deltacloud has graduated and can be put off from your list.
Rat is discussing graduation and should be moved from the list too.
The master list
On 17 November 2011 10:42, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the
Apache Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12
in total now) from
).
The ASF primarily releases source; releases must include full source.
I agree about the KEYS file. We should have uploaded it to the dist
dir as well but at least we have it at some place so it should be easy
to fix.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:07 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote
, 2011 at 13:07, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2011 10:42, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl
wrote:
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the
Apache Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've
this
again. You should be able to build all of the components by using the
-source.jar's that are provided. They contain what is necessary i.e.,
the full source.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:30 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2011 12:29, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com
On 17 November 2011 16:30, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebb,
Just to want to clarify on the source distribution. It seems there are
other Apache projects that release a single distribution with both source
code and jars. For example,
http://mirror.metrocast.net/apache//zookeeper
On 18 November 2011 02:17, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks Sebb and Kevan. This is helpful.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Your svn contains a number of jar files. I don't believe that the
LICENSE/NOTICE file properly reflects
On 18 November 2011 08:10, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:58 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The sponsoring entity is normally the Incubator, sometimes another PMC.
According to podlings.xml the sponsor is the Incubator, so please fix the
site.
Woah, I
On 17 November 2011 21:16, Billie J Rinaldi billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Accumulo
(incubating) version 1.3.5. This will be the first incubator release for
Accumulo.
This candidate has received 4 binding +1 votes (1 IPMC, 3
On 18 November 2011 03:44, cross...@apache.org wrote:
Author: crossley
Date: Fri Nov 18 03:44:37 2011
New Revision: 1203478
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1203478view=rev
Log:
Remove the fixcrlf target (which was added in r463590 and r741205). I reckon
that this is now not needed,
plugin to create source zips was for?
...ant
Ant,
You AND Sebb are right, and I was wrong.
Thanks.
So perhaps it is the documentation that is lacking/incomplete/unclear.
Where should this be documented?
Everyone else feel free to join in.
--benson
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:22 PM
On 18 November 2011 15:04, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:10 PM, sebb wrote:
On 17 November 2011 16:30, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebb,
Just to want to clarify on the source distribution. It seems
On 18 November 2011 19:33, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Nov 18, 2011, at 10:01 AM, sebb wrote:
On 18 November 2011 15:04, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:10 PM, sebb wrote:
On 17
On 19 November 2011 01:05, cross...@apache.org wrote:
Author: crossley
Date: Sat Nov 19 01:05:40 2011
New Revision: 1203933
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1203933view=rev
Log:
Argh, it does need FixCRL on macosx too. So now use this task on all systems
again. I see where they are
On 19 November 2011 08:33, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 4:27 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
Even if the problem is fixed for some or all systems, I suggest we
keep the target so it can be invoked directly.
i.e
, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:30 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2011 12:29, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure what this has to do with the graduation vote. The release
as such has been accepted by the incubator pmc and there only need to
be one release. The source for each
On 21 November 2011 07:40, Bilung Lee b...@apache.org wrote:
This will be the first incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
1.4.0-incubating.
We got two IPMC votes from our dev list and are looking for a third.
Thanks!
*** Please cast the vote by November 23, 2011 ***
Dev list vote
On 21 November 2011 13:23, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
+1 on redefining the Champion role as described in this thread
(without assuming existing Champions will be happy with this new
responsibility - if a mentor is not willing to take on the role then
the podling has a
the requirement for a single source release doesn't seem
totally clear, I've said I think you should have one and so has sebb,
it would be good to hear what other Incubator PMC people think. I
think you need one for two main reasons:
1) The ASF deals with source and the releases are how users get
On 21 November 2011 13:54, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
We also don't always document the Champion - it is on the initial
proposal, but only some status pages seem to include the information.
Perhaps we should
On 21 November 2011 15:08, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:53 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 November 2011 13:54, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
If we agree
. Is that the resolution
then? All we have to do is a do a micro release with the source
distribution configured on a per artifact level?
I agree the requirement for a single source release doesn't seem
totally clear, I've said I think you should have one and so has sebb,
it would be good to hear
is a do a micro release with the source
distribution configured on a per artifact level?
I agree the requirement for
a single source release doesn't seem
totally clear, I've said I think you should have one and so has sebb,
it would be good to hear what other Incubator PMC people think. I
On 21 November 2011 18:22, Scott Deboy scott.de...@gmail.com wrote:
What about getting rid of the word 'champion'? Seems like there are two
roles: the Member(s) which backed the proposal to enter the incubator, and
a Coordinator.
I think Champion is a good name, especially for the pre-podling
On 21 November 2011 19:25, Arvind Prabhakar arv...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:15 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 November 2011 07:40, Bilung Lee b...@apache.org wrote:
This will be the first incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
1.4.0-incubating.
We got two IPMC
the required incubator disclaimer.
This needs to be fixed ASAP please.*
Updated by Arvind.
Thanks!
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:15 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 November 2011 07:40, Bilung Lee b...@apache.org wrote:
This will be the first incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
, with not much digestive activity in between.
In this sense I guess I'm trying to agree with you, but I wonder how
to get a giant committee of people, most of whom signed up just to
mentor one project, to actually step up and exercise more oversight.
Of course we've got a few people like Sebb who
On 23 November 2011 05:17, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
All,
I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and
ready for your testing and voting.
Release candidate artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/
Given the expansion in the Champion role that is being proposed, I
think it would make sense to include an entry for the champion role in
podlings.xml.
Also, it would make sense to publish the name of the champion in the
listing of podlings:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
Not
Just wondering whether it would be useful to add a link to the board
minutes that establish podlings and create TLPs?
So for example, Libcloud was established in [1]; this could be added
to podlings.xml and added as a link in Start Date column in the list
of podlings [2].
Similarly for graduated
On 23 November 2011 20:29, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
sebb wrote on Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 20:19:47 +:
Just wondering whether it would be useful to add a link to the board
minutes that establish podlings
The IPMC creates podlings.
Doh!
[Sorry, brian farted!]
and create
:
sebb wrote on Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 20:38:51 +:
I suppose an alternative would be to create an index to the board
meeting minutes just showing the TLP creations ordered by TLP name.
That might be more generally useful.
Shane has that in a CSV somewhere I think
On 23 November 2011 22:39, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:05 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Given the expansion in the Champion role that is being proposed, I
think it would make sense to include an entry for the champion role in
podlings.xml.
+1
On 23 November 2011 23:52, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Kafka community is excited to share that RC for release of
Kafka-0.7.0-incubating has been +1'd over at kafka-user@incubator. Please
try it out and vote for the Apache Kafka 0.7.0-incubating release. This is
the
On 24 November 2011 03:29, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I'm sorry. I did not mean to suggest that the champion of the PPMC of which
I am a member is any of those cases. I'm certain our champion is
On 24 November 2011 12:01, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:52 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 November 2011 11:34, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:00 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 November 2011
On 24 November 2011 15:18, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Coordination problems (getting everyone here on the same page)
require community documentation and constant pointers to said
documentation in order to be fully resolved.
Whenever we find ourselves making contradicting
NUnit but it's not in the NOTICE file.
Quoting sebb and Kafka's champion (Chris C) discussed this in the last
vote
-
4) Your NOTICE file includes lot's of This product includes X,
developed by X.org Your notice file should only include notices that you
are *required* to have. Don't include
On 28 November 2011 02:56, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I think you missed a very important part of what I said, let me quote
the para you refer to:
[snip]
My point is we can't expect the mentors to
As people may have seen, I added a champion entry to podlings.xml.
In the case of current podlings only, the entry is listed in the
sponsor column under the sponsor name.
The entries were extracted from the podling status files that listed
their champion (not all do), and hopefully gradually
On 28 November 2011 11:40, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
...Assuming this goes ahead in some form:
Do we want to list both the initial champion (prior to acceptance) and
the current champion (during
On 28 November 2011 19:21, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 11/28/2011 1:00 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth re-cutting.
We have been assuming that it is the rule of Apache to cut another RC even
if it
. Since cutting RCs is a significant
time investment, we'd appreciate if you could list all the concerns you
have once.
I do not hold back my concerns hand them out in piecemeal fashion. I
overlooked the DLL in earlier release candidate reviews; I made a mistake. :)
2. Sebb, if you have
On 28 November 2011 19:22, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 28, 2011 7:01 PM, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth
On 29 November 2011 16:26, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
This specifically says that a majority is NOT required.
This does seem odd.
This does mean that a release (for example due to a security issue)
cannot
On 29 November 2011 16:37, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2011, Alan D. Cabrera
wrote:
... It is not a requirement that the NOTICE file be minimal. Let's worry
about this for the 0.7.x or 0.8.0 release
It think it *is* a requirement, according
On 29 November 2011 16:59, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2011, Alan D. Cabrera
wrote:
... It is not a requirement that the NOTICE file be minimal. Let's
On 29 November 2011 18:34, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
No committee can take action without a majority on that committee
approving the action. The VP might take action by fiat (they are
given that authority) - I can't imagine that would ever happen
except in consultation
On 29 November 2011 22:25, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:30 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
But if the team already agrees that the changes need to be made, why
not do so and re-roll?
I'd just leave that up to the release manager to decide
I've done a short trawl of the pages that relate to release voting.
There are two pages that I think need updating - please read on.
The Httpd release description [1] says:
For the ASF to release the candidate tarball/archive, at least three
project members must vote affirmatively for release,
On 30 November 2011 14:11, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Yupyup. I thought I'd add a little background rant here, that I wrote
for the jena podling a bit ago. Purely optional reading but maybe
illuminating for some.
cheerio,
- Leo
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Leo Simons
On 1 December 2011 06:16, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I notice that the NOTICE has this incomplete statement:
This product includes the scala runtime and compiler
(www.scala-lang.org) developed by EPFL, which includes
the following license:
There is not any
On 1 December 2011 02:29, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Kafka community is hoping to get some feedback on the updated NOTICE
and LICENSE files for Kafka, before we post a new vote for it.
http://people.apache.org/~nehanarkhede/NOTICE
There are spurious === lines at
On 1 December 2011 21:58, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
I took a quick look at some of these artifacts. I definitely see licenses
missing from the LICENSE file. For example:
paranamer-2.2.jar --
On 29 November 2011 14:24, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Accumulo, with the artifacts
versioned as 1.3.5-incubating.
VOTE:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00939.html
RESULT:
On 2 December 2011 09:33, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have generated your list of jars from looking at
kafka-0.7.0-incubating.tar.gz, the binary distribution that has been
built as a
On 2 December 2011 10:50, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 November 2011 14:24, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Accumulo, with the artifacts
versioned as 1.3.5-incubating.
VOTE:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accumulo-dev
On 2 December 2011 10:50, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 November 2011 14:24, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Accumulo, with the artifacts
versioned as 1.3.5-incubating.
VOTE:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accumulo-dev
On 2 December 2011 13:11, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
Marvin says... supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date
(Wed, Dec 7th).
That's Incubator Marvin, who requires podlings to provide an extra week's notice
The December report[1] says... reports are due here by the
On 2 December 2011 13:38, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 December 2011 13:11, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
Marvin says... supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date
(Wed, Dec 7th).
That's
On 2 December 2011 14:12, Billie J Rinaldi billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote:
On Friday, December 2, 2011 7:11:36 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Cannot find KEYS file to verify the sigs.
It's here: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/accumulo/KEYS
Thanks, please include the link in future
On 1 December 2011 23:24, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
OK?
Wow, thanks for that effort. Please do.
Now done.
Had to make minor tweaks for readability.
If there are any complaints with my changes, please raise ASAP so they
can be fixed
On 4 December 2011 20:18, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Accumulo
(incubating) version 1.3.5. This will be the first incubator release for
Accumulo.
This release candidate fixes the minor issues found in rc8:
* Added the
On 8 December 2011 10:14, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
The vote on Release ace version 0.8.1-incubator subprojects has been
running for 72h and we didn't see any more votes from IPMC members
other than the 4 votes we already have from the vote on the ace dev
list. Given that this
On 8 December 2011 10:39, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 10:14, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
The vote on Release ace version 0.8.1-incubator subprojects has been
running for 72h and we didn't see any more votes from IPMC members
other than the 4 votes we already have
On 8 December 2011 14:30, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 10:39, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 10:14, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
The vote on Release ace version 0.8.1-incubator
On 8 December 2011 15:28, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 14:30, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 10:39, sebb seb
On 8 December 2011 16:54, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:17 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 15:28, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:21 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2011 14:30, Karl Pauls karlpa
On 9 December 2011 05:45, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Have we made any actionable plans for dealing with
the podling reports this month, or are we content
letting the board reject yet another rollup of all
the raw reports?
You are now :-) Thanks.
I would
On 13 December 2011 17:47, lut...@apache.org wrote:
Author: lutter
Date: Tue Dec 13 17:47:07 2011
New Revision: 1213805
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1213805view=rev
Log:
Redirect Deltacloud to its new post-graduation site
I assume you are going remove the
On 13 December 2011 23:29, David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:23 -0800, David Lutterkort wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 19:19 +, sebb wrote:
On 13 December 2011 17:47, lut...@apache.org wrote:
Author: lutter
Date: Tue Dec 13 17:47:07 2011
New
On 13 December 2011 15:27, sebawag...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebawagner
Date: Tue Dec 13 15:27:36 2011
New Revision: 1213736
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1213736view=rev
Log:
Update OpenMeetings committers account names
Modified:
On 16 December 2011 08:47, Devin Han devin...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
(incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
ODF Toolkit in Apache.
This release candidate fixes the following issues
; there are a lot of incorrect NL
files around and it may be one of them.
2011/12/16 sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 16 December 2011 08:47, Devin Han devin...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
(incubating) version 0.5
On 20 December 2011 18:51, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Kafka community is excited to share that RC 8 for release of
Kafka-0.7.0-incubating has been +1'd over at kafka-user@incubator.
Please try it out and vote for the Apache Kafka 0.7.0-incubating
release. This is the
On 28 December 2011 19:15, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
This is the fifth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts being
versioned as 0.6-incubating.
We are requesting at least one additional IPMC member vote, as we have
received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes
On 3 January 2012 18:41, Eric Yang eric...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear IPMC members,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release.
The artifacts are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc0/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
The SVN
On 4 January 2012 19:45, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 14:33, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Someone created
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/site/trunk/?p=1227271
before the devicemap-commits@ list was created. I expect no list
On 6 January 2012 19:21, Eric Yang eric...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
Agrees with the SVN tag, which is
On 8 January 2012 21:04, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Dear IPMC, dear Community!
The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation
of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE
on graduating as a TLP.
The podling is in the
On 9 January 2012 04:41, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
This has been the subject of prior conversations, but I'm opening a
thread in some hope of reaching a definitive resolution.
Some of our
-
From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfrank...@mitre.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 12:19 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:06 AM
On 9 January 2012 19:40, Eric Yang eric...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
Documents are available at:
On 10 January 2012 02:29, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
[to: general@, cc: callback-dev@]
As discussed during the Callback proposal phase [1], the podling
community wasn't too certain about the Callback name and thus after
some discussion they recently voted [2] on
On 10 January 2012 10:13, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:48 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On a related matter, how is the rename being handled for the various
incubator data files, web-pages, mailing lists etc.?
We're still working
401 - 500 of 1541 matches
Mail list logo
