Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

regards, Alexei Fedotov, Intel Middleware Products Division >-Original Message- >From: Anton Luht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 2:01 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure > >Alexei

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Now everything is ok, thanks! Regards, 2006/9/29, Anton Luht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Alexey, I was configuring site at that time :) I hope I've solved the problems with connection pool settings - sorry for the inconvenience. On 9/29/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Anton, > >

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Alexey, I was configuring site at that time :) I hope I've solved the problems with connection pool settings - sorry for the inconvenience. On 9/29/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Anton, I hate to tell you this but it is down again (12:00 MSK). I'm not complaining, just want

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hi Anton, I hate to tell you this but it is down again (12:00 MSK). I'm not complaining, just want to look at the site. :) Regards, 2006/9/28, Anton Luht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello, The problem could be that hoster uses Mysql 4 while the app was configured for Mysql 5 - I've changed the setti

RE: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Thursday, September 28, 2006 2:01 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure > >Alexei, > >VM hanged in the process of test execution - I killed it and tests >proceeded - I'm not sure whether this crash is recorded as error

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hello, The problem could be that hoster uses Mysql 4 while the app was configured for Mysql 5 - I've changed the settings - it's up again - I'll be watching it... On 9/28/06, Anton Luht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Seems like the real-life testing broke the app :) Sorry for the inconvenience - I'

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Seems like the real-life testing broke the app :) Sorry for the inconvenience - I'm going to investigate it and bring it bask asap. On 9/28/06, Anton Luht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alexei, Thanks for the info - fixed. -- Regards, Anton Luht, Intel Middleware Products Division -- Regards,

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Alexei, Thanks for the info - fixed. -- Regards, Anton Luht, Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

> search options by the right margin of my screen. I would suggest > reordering table rows in a way fixed width fields go first. > http://www.harmonytest.org/testapp.do?method=showrun&id=4&name=&result=1 > &jira=0 > > >-Original Message- > >From: A

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 7:44 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure > >> I think we'd want this to be "registered user can add user" > >Done. I'm still the only person with

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 7:44 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure > >> I think we'd want this to be "registered user can add user" > >Done. I'm still the only person with

RE: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure > >> I think we'd want this to be "registered user can add user" > >Done. I'm still the only person with login - sen

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Cool! I think we'd want this to be "registered user can add user" On Sep 26, 2006, at 10:00 AM, Anton Luht wrote: Hello, The features were implemented - now it's an app backed up by database (mysql). The app was deployed at http://www.harmonytest.org . If you want to have a login/password

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hello, The features were implemented - now it's an app backed up by database (mysql). The app was deployed at http://www.harmonytest.org . If you want to have a login/password to be able not only view but also modify test results (add comments, add JIRA issues numbers to failing tests) - please s

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

I think we'd want this to be "registered user can add user" Done. I'm still the only person with login - send me your login/password to register. -- Regards, Anton Luht, Intel Middleware Products Division - Terms of use : http

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hello, Seems like nobody is using this test results storage - the problem may be that it has very few features. I'm going to implement something I think will be useful - please make comments if you have any. Features are: - autorization - authorized users can modify tests results, for example, l

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Thanks, These were remains of setup experiments - removed from the list. On 9/4/06, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Seems, that links upload60551 Europe/Moscow 11.2.0 x86 Wi

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Seems, that links upload60551 Europe/Moscow 11.2.0 x86 Windows XP 5.1 upload60552

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hello, I've deployed the test infrastructure app to http://harmonytest.org . It is mostly for demo purpose - the disk space is not too large - I hope it will move somewhere else after evaluation. Please try to upload your test results there and send comments/wishes about the app - I'll try to i

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure > >On 7/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> That's what the buildtest subproject is for. Have you loo

RE: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

rom: Vladimir Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:56 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure > >On 7/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> &g

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hello, I've uploaded a proto of a proto for test infrastructure to http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1062 . At least it allows to upload test results to a server. Unfortunately I haven't found a server to deploy it yet so I can't send URL that contains test installation. The screenshot

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Anton Luht wrote: > Hello, > > I'm all open for any suggestions and wishes - I'm not an architect but > a humble coder :) > An architect is a coder with "architect" on their business card :) > Regarding Struts: putting logic in JSP looks ugly for me. Puttind > 'out.println(' to Java code look

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hello, Alexei. There are many ways in which you can achieve the separation of business logic from presentation layer. Have you heard about MVC (or Model-View-Controller) paradigm? . However, this is a hand-made variant of the MVC-framework. :) Yes, that's why I've chosen Struts. It's an MV

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

IMHO to make the concrete choice of web application framework we need to answer the question: do we plan to develop more web-based scripts/apps for Harmony in the future? Any suggestions? Regards, 2006/8/3, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Anton, > Regarding Struts: putting logic in JSP

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hi Anton, Regarding Struts: putting logic in JSP looks ugly for me. Puttind 'out.println(' to Java code looks ugly, too. I remember There are many ways in which you can achieve the separation of business logic from presentation layer. Have you heard about MVC (or Model-View-Controller) paradig

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Alexei Zakharov wrote: > Anton, > > How many pages do you plan to have in your application? I mean that > Struts is probably too heavy solution for couple of pages (if this is > your case). *IMHO* I was thinking the same thing, but was going to keep quiet unless someone else spoke up. However,

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Anton, How many pages do you plan to have in your application? I mean that Struts is probably too heavy solution for couple of pages (if this is your case). *IMHO* Best Regards, 2006/8/2, Anton Luht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello, > > I believe that there are more installations that can execute C

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Jetty or Tomcat will handle this fine. geir Alexei Zakharov wrote: > Hi Geir, > > Well, if we will have a java-based webserver then there is no problem. As > far as I understand Anton wasn't sure we have one. > > Regards, > > 2006/8/2, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> Alexei Za

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hello, > I believe that there are more installations that can execute CGI than > those that can run servlets. I'm sure that for the first time the test > infrastructure will be deployed to an existing installation but not to > a dedicated server - that's why I decided that CGI suites better. Bu

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hi Geir, Well, if we will have a java-based webserver then there is no problem. As far as I understand Anton wasn't sure we have one. Regards, 2006/8/2, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Alexei Zakharov wrote: > Anton, > > I have no objections here, just thinking about Harmony-hosted Ha

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Alexei Zakharov wrote: > Anton, > > I have no objections here, just thinking about Harmony-hosted Harmony > web site - it can become really good self explanatory reliability > test. Not today, I agree. But may be some day. Well, I have objections if I understand things correctly. There is no r

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Anton Luht wrote: > Hello Alexei, > > I believe that there are more installations that can execute CGI than > those that can run servlets. I'm sure that for the first time the test > infrastructure will be deployed to an existing installation but not to > a dedicated server - that's why I decide

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Anton Luht wrote: > Hello, > > I know why this thread is so lazy - it's because everybody dislikes QA > & testing :) > >> OK, now let me add my $0.02 about my vision about reporting of test >> results. I believe it's better to do this using HTTP rather than mail >> because some people may not h

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Anton, I have no objections here, just thinking about Harmony-hosted Harmony web site - it can become really good self explanatory reliability test. Not today, I agree. But may be some day. With Regards, 2006/8/1, Anton Luht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello Alexei, I believe that there are more ins

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hello Alexei, I believe that there are more installations that can execute CGI than those that can run servlets. I'm sure that for the first time the test infrastructure will be deployed to an existing installation but not to a dedicated server - that's why I decided that CGI suites better. When

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hi Anton, I believe that most common server-side engine is CGI (not PHP or J2EE) so I'd like to implement this using Perl CGI scripts. (just thinking about) there are several good Java-oriented technologies - servlets, JSP, JSF - why not to use them? I don't like to say that servlets are more

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

On 7/29/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's not what the HDK is intended for. (I was afraid of this when it was named... I also ran into the same thing explaining it to people this week... The HDK is not analogous to the JDK - it's really an SDK to assist in the developm

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > On 7/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> We already have a script for building the HDK and JRE. The publishing >> part should be fairly straightforward. I imagine we'll have volunteers >> that produce the designated nightly snapshots for a gi

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > On 7/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> That's what the buildtest subproject is for. Have you looked at it? > > > > Yes. When I tried to run it for the first time I saw problems with > and > commands - they did not work in my environ

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > On 7/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> ... >> >> Who would want to use HDK and not run tests? I would assume you'd want >> to run tests of other modules that depend on the thing you are working >> on. >> >> >> geir > > > > I use SUN and BEA

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hello, I know why this thread is so lazy - it's because everybody dislikes QA & testing :) OK, now let me add my $0.02 about my vision about reporting of test results. I believe it's better to do this using HTTP rather than mail because some people may not have access to SMTP port (for example,

RE: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

>-Original Message- >From: Vladimir Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 5:05 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure > >On 7/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

On 7/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We already have a script for building the HDK and JRE. The publishing part should be fairly straightforward. I imagine we'll have volunteers that produce the designated nightly snapshots for a given platform so we can get the widest va

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

On 7/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... Who would want to use HDK and not run tests? I would assume you'd want to run tests of other modules that depend on the thing you are working on. geir I use SUN and BEA JDK's and both were without tests (but with demo's). I th

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

On 7/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's what the buildtest subproject is for. Have you looked at it? Yes. When I tried to run it for the first time I saw problems with and commands - they did not work in my environment due to: - no proxy settings for and comm

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Hello, Here are the results of testing CC script on Linux and Windows A problem for both platforms: fetching classlib dependencies behind proxy doesn't work. Setting ANT_OPTS doesn't help. Setting in Windows ANT_OPTS in System->...->Environment variables (I thought they should have been passed t

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > The more I go further with build&testing infrastructure and think about it > the more the following overall picture is drawing in my mind. > Let me share it to see the whole picture and what I see should be next in > build and testing infrastructure: > > Goal: Harmony qu

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > On 7/24/06, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 7/21/06, Mark Hindess < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > I was planning to jar up tests from modules just as I have with the >> test >> > support classes (in build/test/support.jar) and >> >>

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

The more I go further with build&testing infrastructure and think about it the more the following overall picture is drawing in my mind. Let me share it to see the whole picture and what I see should be next in build and testing infrastructure: Goal: Harmony quality Objectives: - Set-up regula

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

On 7/24/06, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/21/06, Mark Hindess < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I was planning to jar up tests from modules just as I have with the test > support classes (in build/test/support.jar) and I created issue 984 with simple patch that jars modu

RE: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

> -Original Message- > From: Anton Luht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 5:32 AM > To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure > > Geir, > > I've managed to get CC running on

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Geir, I've managed to get CC running on Windows. I had no problems with checkout of classlib - maybe you've stepped on the long paths problem - I've made a testing build directory close to root. The start.win target didn't work for me - I've changed it according to Ant FAQ.

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

On 7/21/06, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was planning to jar up tests from modules just as I have with the test support classes (in build/test/support.jar) and I'd expect those to remain in the hdk. Seems, that it will enough to pack all modules\\bin\test directories into one j

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

On 7/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > I tried to use it. It is OK, but I have some comments on it. First of all, > let me describe as I see the testing process: > > - for developers: > Before the commit of new feature/ fix the developer should run so

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

On 21 July 2006 at 9:09, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > > I tried to use it. It is OK, but I have some comments on it. First of all, > > let me describe as I see the testing process: > > > > - for developers: > > Before the commit of new feature/ fix th

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > I tried to use it. It is OK, but I have some comments on it. First of all, > let me describe as I see the testing process: > > - for developers: > Before the commit of new feature/ fix the developer should run some > 'pre-integration tests' (it may be unit tests) to be s

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

I tried to use it. It is OK, but I have some comments on it. First of all, let me describe as I see the testing process: - for developers: Before the commit of new feature/ fix the developer should run some 'pre-integration tests' (it may be unit tests) to be sure that workspace will not broken b

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Alex Blewitt wrote: > FWIW Mac OS X doesn't have tools.jar in $JAVA_HOME/lib. Instead, the > tools are in the classes.jar file (no, it's not called rt.jar either) > in $JAVA_HOME/../Classes/classes.jar. It's a bit unfortunate that it > has both the run-time libraries and the tools in one place, b

Re: Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

FWIW Mac OS X doesn't have tools.jar in $JAVA_HOME/lib. Instead, the tools are in the classes.jar file (no, it's not called rt.jar either) in $JAVA_HOME/../Classes/classes.jar. It's a bit unfortunate that it has both the run-time libraries and the tools in one place, but essentially it means that

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Richard Liang wrote: It seems that JAVA_HOME is required by cc/cruisecontrol.sh on my Ubuntu :-) Do I miss something? Thanks a lot. That seems to be the case :) If you set it, does it work? Yes, It works :-) It seems to want it for two things, tools.

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Richard Liang wrote: > > It seems that JAVA_HOME is required by cc/cruisecontrol.sh on my Ubuntu > :-) Do I miss something? Thanks a lot. That seems to be the case :) If you set it, does it work? It seems to want it for two things, tools.jar (for it's JSPs?) and where to find java executable

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Thanks for all the comments - I know this will be an exciting part of our project ;) (There were no comments...) Anyway, I checked in into enhanced/buildtest. In trunk, you should be able to : ant setup and have the almost the thing install and ant just kicks

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Aside from being distracted by my new macbook pro dual core intel wonderbox, I was playing with seeding a build/test/ci infrastructure, and want to solicit comments before I check in something. I call this a seed because I know there's a lot of interest in a richer

Re: [build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Thanks for all the comments - I know this will be an exciting part of our project ;) (There were no comments...) Anyway, I checked in into enhanced/buildtest. In trunk, you should be able to : ant setup and have the almost the thing install and ant just kicks it off and runs it. I say "

[build-test-infra] Build Test Infrastructure

Aside from being distracted by my new macbook pro dual core intel wonderbox, I was playing with seeding a build/test/ci infrastructure, and want to solicit comments before I check in something. I call this a seed because I know there's a lot of interest in a richer framework for perf/stabil