Interesting, I would be happy to test on 32bit Ubuntu or 32bit Win. I've
had a couple of tricky mosaic procjets a couple of years ago, but gave up
on Hugin. the problem with the (IMHO) wrong axis was one of the issues I
belive. This sounds better.
Cheers
/O
2013/2/22 Terry Duell
Great!
Has anyone built a windows test version of this that could be shared for
playing around with?
Cheers
/O
2012/5/15 Jim Watters jwatt...@photocreations.ca
On 2012-05-14 7:45 PM, Margaret Wong wrote:
Personally I think of the Assistant as 'beginner', and anything to do
with
Yes that one looks fun, fairly cheap too. It fuses gyro,accelerometer and
magnetometer so it gives a stable solution. Resolution does not mean
accuracy ;-), but it should be good enogh for playing around.
I wish a digital camera could catch and save some data over USB at the
moment of shooting,
How are you doing with the Attitude in EXIF-experiments?
Cheers
/O
2011/12/11 Geoff G8DHE geoff.mat...@gmail.com
The Solmeta refers to it as Tilt, aircraft refer to it as Pitch - take
your pick ;-) No real preference to be honest!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Quality wise, it will not be good enough for stiching, but as starting
values for the estimation process, it should be helpful.
If extended to the mosiac mode where the solution is more ambiguous, it
should help limiting the solution space.And for other photogrammetry
applications it should
Cool! Just a question, why tilt and not just pitch? Keep us posted.
Cheers
/O
2011/12/7 Geoff G8DHE geoff.mat...@gmail.com
OK, just been trying out the idea of creating a couple of UserDefined
fields in ExifTools and it seems to work OK;
I created GPSRoll and GPSTilt within the GPS section
Good that I could incite some action ;-)
That board looks interesting.
Look at:
http://www.sparkfun.com/products/10736
http://www.x-io.co.uk/node/9 (which i considered as i want logging to
memory card)
Cheers
O
2011/12/7 Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com
Ok,
I think I'm going to go
Right, I was going to say the same. Most iphone and andorid phone has this
capability, soon every little gadget will too. The camera producers need to
se the benefit though. Which I think instant panorama, 3D application etc
would be.
With GPS there are add ons to e.g. Lightroom that correlates
...@googlemail.com
On 5 Dec 2011 13:29, Oskar Sander wrote:
Allright, Is there documentation on how this logics works somwhere to
read.
I'm guessing by the name that it is assuming a single flat plane that
the images is should be projected on in order for the CP to match. Right?
'hom' isn't a special
Well, using timestamp correlating photos and a correlated track of
angles could be trivial.
Does the EXIF standard permitt custom data fields (like in this case
adding heading, rotation, pitch and yaw). In that case it would be
possible to use this infor to generate starting ypr values in
Allright, Is there documentation on how this logics works somwhere to read.
I'm guessing by the name that it is assuming a single flat plane that the
images is should be projected on in order for the CP to match. Right?
So if the reality is different, it is better to search for CP in groups of
Thats really nice Bruno!
Is is rightly understood that you optimize all ZYX at once together (for
all viewpoints) then ypr for all together? Is that always stable?
I've missed the fact you should give different parameters for mosaic CP
find, what does that do?
Cheers
/O
2011/11/16 Bruno
Is there any cameras out there today that record the camera attitude in
EXIF?
Most cameras have at least one tilt sensor (r), but it would be nice to
have tilt around all axis and heading. This could be used as initial values
for optimizations for hand held panoramas (mosaics in my case)
Cheers
/Hugin_Scripting_Interface.html
[2]
http://hugin.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/hugin/hugin/file/a36935eda2d9/src/hugin_script_interface/demo_plugin.py
2011/9/5 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com
Thanks,
I've seen a lot of discussions about the hsi here, what is the status?
Not yet stable i suppose? Any plugins ready
-Aug-2011 at 12:58 +0200, Oskar Sander wrote:
I want to start my mosaic-mode projects by dragging around the images
first,
but for this it would be good to have the deck spread out first instead as
all stacked on the same position like a deck of cards. It would be good
to
just spread them out
I've played around with it and this is a really nice application, thanks
guys!
Can I use it also when focal length/fov is not quite known, or must I get
that in some other way? (Hugin for example)
The thing is ´my camera has a focal length of 5.1mm eqv to 24 mm on 35mm
film, alright. But then I
2011/9/1 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com
I've played around with it and this is a really nice application, thanks
guys!
Can I use it also when focal length/fov is not quite known, or must I get
that in some other way? (Hugin for example)
The thing is ´my camera has a focal length
I think these CP strategies are interesting. APSC tended to give me 5 points
in a corner a bit too often. So CPfind seems to be the way forward even if
it will need some more options.
It should be fairly straghtforward to limit the number of CP's per image
pair by some more or less clever
Hi
I'm starting to use Hugin again after a year's break or so.
I wonder what options I have to do the following:
I want to start my mosaic-mode projects by dragging around the images first,
but for this it would be good to have the deck spread out first instead as
all stacked on the same
Hi Windows builders!
Maybe anyone of you would like to publicise a test-binary somewhere for us
building-impared to test on?
Cheers
/O
2011/8/21 Jeff boydj...@gmail.com
I had the same problem trying to compile Hugin after being away from it for
a couple months (see
A recent mosaic of hidden rooms in the great pyramid, see link below.
However they should have used Hugin, lousy blending!
http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/zooms/pyramids-hieroglyphs-robot-mystery-110526.html
This is a bit OT I know, but it would be interesting to hear from some more
Cool, I got to try that! These can be independant images, as long as there
are straight lines at same focal length, or? The more the better?
/O
2011/5/18 T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de
On 18 Mai, 04:18, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hullo All,
I have just committed a patch to the
But is it right to say that you still do need to indicate to Hugin how you
would like to projet the images, i.e. what view you want. In a case where
all the immages have been at an angle, I've done this by in one image
indcate a straight vertical and horizontal line for hugin to include in
Maybe a stupid question, what happens when ypr are not the most significant
parameters like in a mosaic?Will any of the RANSAC models work (I
would assume one has to use the old version if anything...)
/O
2011/2/8 kfj _...@yahoo.com
On 7 Feb., 23:10, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com
.
Let us know how it goes,
Aron
On Nov 10, 2:44 am, Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What's the current status if you want to play with building hugin for
windows?
I've been following the discussions about this:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_SDK_%28MSVC_2010%29
So if I
Hi,
What's the current status if you want to play with building hugin for windows?
I've been following the discussions about this:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_SDK_%28MSVC_2010%29
So if I want to set up the structure myself in order to play with the
code of the Hugin GUI, I would use
Yes, agree. The idea with deliberate selections sounds really good.
Is there a way today to make an image to end up on top in the
preview? This would help draging as well as verifying
alignment/contribution of one specific image without having to turn
off adjacent images.
Cheers
/O
Cool Darko, should I enter a bug for it?
How about the translation ratio? Is that an effect of the x,y movement from
the mouse translating to something different on the panosphere?
Cheers
/O
2010/10/29 Darko Makreshanski dmakreshan...@gmail.com
Hi,
On 10/29/2010 10:22 AM, voschix wrote:
I've played a bit with some of the mosaic mode features and some thoughts
comes to my mind.
*Background*
I'm working on a project I'm expanding with several lines of mosaic-style
photos. This is an example using 40 images in 3 vertical lines out of 20
lines[1], I have up to now only focues on
Is the SURF scale and orientation independent per each identified feature
or ar they somehow liked within an image? Is distorsion somehow factored
in?
A thought on unevenly placed CP that often turns out to be a problem for
me. Maybe look at what align_image_stack does. It seems to divide the
Cool, what's new in 2010.3 part from the cpfind as compared to the .2 just
released?
Cheers
O
2010/10/19 Henk Tijdink h.tijd...@gmail.com
I've downloaded and tested this version of Hugin.
Downloaded cpfind too.
Found the following shortcomings.
CPfind works OK in this build and in
Hi!
I must admitt i am not the best in class reading READMEs.Installing that
runtime library fixed my enblend problem.
However, I had the same problem with *both *enblend_openmp.exe and
enblend.exe
So it seems like there is a dependency (wrong?) also with the ordinary
enblend version?
Hey there!
I just sucessfully downloaded your 32b installer with all controll point
generators and it seems to work perfectly so far! Tanks alot!
One problem i seem always have lately with the hugin kits, is the
enblend.exe doesnt run on my XP. The system cannot execute the specified
Thanks,
My computer is running XP Professional SP2, Intel Core2 Duo P8600, 2.4GHz
Before adding that to the list of non-supported CPUs, shoudnt that
generation have the SSE2?
Cheers
2010/9/28 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch
Hi Oskar,
On September 28, 2010 06:50:42 am Oskar Sander wrote:
One
Hi!
No, it is yet another format, I think they call it photomerge composition
file, see here for example:
http://graphicssoft.about.com/cs/photoshop/qt/csphotomerge.htm
Cheers
/O
2010/9/25 Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au
Hullo Oskar,
On Sep 25, 5:03 am, Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com
Hi,
Does anyone heare have a clue about the adobe photomerge file format for
panoramas? The suffix is pmg for these files. I would be interested to look
at a conversion...
Cheers
O
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic
That sounds great!
It woold be cool to see some screenshots of the panorama overview. It souns
really cool but is hard to mentally visualize.
Cheers
O
2010/9/20 T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de
Project 1: Panorama overview by Darko Makreshanski
This adds new functionality to the fast preview
Hi Yuv,
Nice walk though! I picked up a couple of nice features that I didn't used
before, like use only control point from images visible... that was a
good one i think i will use a lot going forward!
A few assorted questions come to my mind:
* Is there something inherent in CP detection
Hello,
Nice thankyou!
Is this using the new windows installer, any experiences on the list using
this build?
/O
2010/9/16 Matthew Petroff matt...@mpetroff.net
A Hugin 2010.2.0 rc1 build for Windows can be found here:
http://www.box.net/shared/k5zn0d9bsh
A Windows installer can be found
Well, it sure isn't foolproof. I have a feeling there are so many local
optimas so that it easy to throw the optimization off when there are errors
in CP etc. Maybe there are some fulats in there to contribute to the
instability too. It is quite a new function.
I've had some sucess by only
Kudos Tom!
I got stuck twice on installing SDKs the last year. Please let the list know
if you need some testing assistance!
Cheers
/O
2010/6/27 Tom Glastonbury t...@tomglastonbury.com
Note also that I am in the process of producing an set of Perl scripts
which will download and prepare all
I took a stab at this one and just updated the wiki for *Layout tab*
I just realized the *Move/drag* description on the same page does not
mention what *normal/mosaic* mode means. So I also added something short
here.
Btw these are new undefined concepts that may require proper definitions...
Hello!
I just downloaded the latest enblend/enfuse from SF:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/enblend/files/enblend-enfuse/enblend-enfuse-4.0/enblend-enfuse-4.0-win32.zip/download
However when running enblend.exe or enfuse.exe I get an error The system
cannot execute the specified program
Am I
- Works
well.
What are the limitation of using a GPU variant? Someone here suggested that
translation wasn't supported, but maybe that was nona...
/O
2010/6/21 Bruno Postle brunopos...@googlemail.com
On 21 June 2010 13:25, Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com wrote:
However when running
I've played with the layout mode (thanks to ZZ's builds), and must say that
it is quickly progressing.
I have come to think about some feature improvements that I'd like to
discuss. Consider this project with a few images in a row [1]. The images
are scaled down in order to examine the CP
2010/6/11 James Legg lankyle...@gmail.com
a) It would be good if the connections also was hidden when the
corresponding images are hidden.
Good suggestion. I didn't think it made sense to show connections to
hidden images, so I just implemented this in trunk.
Excellent!
b) Maybe
Helmut,
That sounds excellent! We would really appreciate if you would like to open
that souce. I hope you find it :-)
/O
2010/6/3 H.Dersch d...@fh-furtwangen.de
On 3 Jun., 08:47, Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com wrote:
For old-scool Hugin, it may sound far-fetched. But as you may
Hello Helmut!
It sounds great to revive this functionality booth, in panotools and if you
like to open up PTstereo source too.
For old-scool Hugin, it may sound far-fetched. But as you may have seen,
Hugin (with panotools) has evolved into also providing a basic mosaic mode
wiich includes
Oh I forgot about those, I need to test...
* How about a corresponding CP-search strategy that would use overlapping
instead of adjacent? This could use the
layout drag mode to build the structure.
To compare with Adobe's photomerge.
* In the start the photos are all in a unused pane
* You
I agree it would be useful. If so, I'd laminate the target for use in the
pool :-)
Well this one got some math in it:
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/lensprofile_creator/lensprofile_creator_cameramodel_dataconversion.pdf
But why not try it out empirically? Calibrate your lens with
Please. expand on the linear panorama stub anyone. I needed to illustrate
for myself how the model works, in order to understand how to optimize and
build projects.
A 1, 2 3 how-to would be a very useful additon.
2010/5/11 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net
To prememt experimentation (optimizer
Cool. I suppose this also rely on some fairly good internal gyro
accelerometer readings as well, or does it do all this from onlt feature
matching?
/O
2010/5/11 dkloi dkl...@googlemail.com
Actually, it's quite a neat trick. As you sweep the camera around, the
sensor does capture scene
There should be ways to get around that, at least for true mosaics.
The limitation is that the panorama camera and mosaic projection plane is
fixed. A mosaic can have unlimited FOV if you add up the individual mosaic
images, however the panorama camera can only have a max FOV of the plane
180.
Right. Thanks, I'm with you. It makes sense to have a little more advanced
drag-pane so that individual and group trnasformations/drags are selectable.
Cheers
O
2010/4/29 Darko Makreshanski dmakreshan...@gmail.com
Oskar Sander wrote:
I don't quite understand what you mean with consistency so
And please review and expand on my stub below as you go too. I see now
that I got the Z-axis direction wrong for instance. I'll fix images
later
2010/4/27 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com
I've started on the wikipage stub, please fill in:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Stiching_a_photo
I suppose the answer on this question was no, right?
Last time the SDK was discussed (when I also begun to install it myself, but
stalled on a computer replacement), my impression was that
the moving target was the panotools lib itself. My question is if that is
fairly stable for the moment? So
Now worries Darko, rather than confuse things now with a change , I think
its better to do as you suggest to later add some more controls in the
Drag-pane all at the same time.
I don't quite understand what you mean with consistency so I'd appreciate if
you explained to me when you have time.
I've started on the wikipage stub, please fill in:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Stiching_a_photo-mosaic
The more I think about it, I think the roll in both drag modes are wrong.
Why is the roll around the Z-axis and not around the optical axis of the
camera, as described in the Wiki?
Cheers
/O
--
Excellent thanks!
One problem i experience that may be because I have removed and replaced
installations now for many hugin installation is that enblend.exe give me
the following when trying to start from the command line: The system
cannot execute the specified program this makes hugin make
Is there something written illustrated on the subject on how to
understand these parameters?
I know I've seen on the list quite recently a link to another forum with a
drawing to illustrate this, but I can't seem to find it again. (I think it
was Pablo's drawing)
What I am trying to do is to
2010/4/26 Bruno Postle brunopos...@googlemail.com
Yes your diagram agrees with my understanding. Some refinements would be
that:
The Hugin virtual 'camera' always points straight-ahead in the Z
direction, so your picture plane (in red) would be symmetrical about
the Z axis.
By default
(or like I do to lay out a complete panorama without CPs)
Cheers
/O
2010/4/26 Darko Makreshanski dmakreshan...@gmail.com
Oskar Sander wrote:
So this begs a question though: I've played with Darko's excellent patch
(some of my projects are actually almost better manually laid out) And my
Cool, I'll play with that once I get hold of a testing version.
Did you mean that the optimization doesn't converge if you first didn't drag
photos roughly in place first? Mentally picturing the mosaic
mode-optimization, my (not so scientific) feeling is that it would always
not be an unambiguous
Much appreciated Zoran. Check the credits in the about splash screen
though. It credits TSharples and SVN4920 (It could be me stuffing up the
install, so please confirm another tester too)
Cheers
/O
2010/3/15 Zoran Zorkic zo...@gmx.net
Grab it while it's hot from
Any conclusions on including in trunk?
Cheers
2010/4/12 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com
2010/4/10 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net
It is probably ok as is, but I'm not sure if it needs the option to switch
modes. My understanding is that rotating the scene makes no sense when
2010/4/10 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net
It is probably ok as is, but I'm not sure if it needs the option to switch
modes. My understanding is that rotating the scene makes no sense when
there are XYZ offsets, similarly XY translation makes no sense when there
are no XY offsets. I think I
Sounds like an excellent addition! When could it be allowed into trunk?
I thought that yaw and pitch would be consistent also with non-zero X,Y,Z. I
thought these angles would be applied around the
camera position, not the (0,0,0) coordinate. Which way is it?
A suggestion for changing Z.
Cheers mate
2010/2/10 brian_ims im...@netspace.net.au
Oskar
Search for General Panini by Tom Sharpless
Brian
Oskar Sander wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but I though I saw recently someone posting a win
test-build on the list. However, I can't find it searching. Is there one
out
Nice, but what does final file format section give you then?
Wouldn't you like to have a check box there to disable making the final
panorama stitch in the case you would like to process the intermediate files
or layered tiff in another work flow and don't care about a final file?
Cheers
O
Sounds interesting Thomas. ould it do all thos setps as a part of the
align then you mean? Is this Trunk?
/Cheers
2010/1/11 T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de
I implemented this algorithm inside hugin. To use it please create a
new cp detector setting and set type to multi-row.
I added also a
Stephen
On Jan 3, 10:56 pm, Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com wrote:
Cheers, please bear with my newbie questions:
I'm running through the procedure of [1], adding the tools and adding
glut.
Starting with checking out HEAD from trunk (4847).
Now I'm running through the cmakesetup of [1
Seems like someone added a new lens to the DB yesterday, so Lensfun seems to
be in some use still.What would it take to integrate it w hugin?
There was an interesting comment on the lensfun site. Photozone-de
publicize distortion parameters with their lens reviews, this would be
useful if
Nice indeed,
Substituting, yaw, pitch with X, and Y, this flow should work with mosaics
as well.
About manual movements via GUI, an interface for dragging need to be able to
distinguish between different kinds of moving For example moving a picture
to the right could be described as a Yaw
Cheers
Oskar Sander wrote:
Hi Brian,
How far off is the SDK for building hugin from trunk? I suppose enblend
does
not need to be built as described here [1] as there is a released (or
RC)
4.0 now, right?
[1] http://wiki.panotools.org/Build_Hugin_for_Windows_with_SDK
I have a need to zoom in in the preview window, especially when using the
new layout view, but also sometimes when previewing a classical panorama
with many images.
Is this something already there that I have missed?
Basically the only way to zoom in that i have found, is to change the
vertical
Well, not sure if it is the same problem or not but I had some stability
issues with layouts that puzzled me a bit.
In your case this was a ordinary panorama w.o. XYZ i assume, right?
I had a stability problem recurring in some (4) layout projects. A couple
of images get *completly *wrong
Sweet!
About the variables. When testing the beta-version, I conclude that there
will be a need to change the presentation of the variables. I.e. the
images positions are really camera positions, and for example while lens
distortion characteristics may be linked across all shots, the tripod
Allright, that could be it.
I'm a newbie on perl, but as it's a script language, would it work to
install ActivePerl instead and run the script engine instead of the
precompiled windows binaries? In that case, is there any constraint on perl
version, ie. do i have to run 5.8?
Btw Brunu, your
Hi Brian,
How far off is the SDK for building hugin from trunk? I suppose enblend does
not need to be built as described here [1] as there is a released (or RC)
4.0 now, right?
[1] http://wiki.panotools.org/Build_Hugin_for_Windows_with_SDK
Cheers
2009/12/13 brian_ims im...@netspace.net.au
I'm reading the code [1] to learn how this feature is used, am i
understanding it correctly that it outputs a pto-file with calculated lens
caracteristics based on the input pto whitch contains the calibration
pictures?
Should I look elsewhere for this information?
[1]
://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/calibration/en.shtml
2009/12/16 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net
On Wed 16-Dec-2009 at 14:19 +0100, Oskar Sander wrote:
I'm reading the code [1] to learn how this feature is used, am i
understanding it correctly that it outputs a pto-file with calculated
lens
I'm looking to merge 2 and more separate project(layout model) into one big
project. The projects are vertical lines of images, and they overlap
horizontaly. So the projects does not contain the same image once. I'm
looking to merge those, and then run another CP to find overlap between the
2009/12/9 T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de
Gerry wrote
thought that code that was known to break things wasn't going to be
merged into trunk until it works first. Perhaps you were being
sarcastic
Well, I heard cheerful irony here
There are some bugs regarding the layout mode already
I've been playing with the layout branch, using a test project with
UW-footage [1]
Because this project was done with too little overlap between lines, i have
made separate projects for each line first, to see if there is enough
overlap anywhere to run it through Hugin, the three first lines are
Isn't the circular fisheye projecting a circle on the sensor with the rest
of the sensore rectangle black? The HFOV is the sensor long-side field of
view, so it could be correct if you would imagine the lens would be
projecting outside the circle too.
How does hugin handle all this black void
Actually if you have a 2/3 format and circular fisheye that perfectly fills
the format, the short side FOV is 180deg and the longside theoretical FOV
is then 3*180/2=270. So your figure there sounds perfectly all right
2009/12/3 Oskar Sander oskar.san...@gmail.com
Isn't the circular fisheye
I agree it would be good to limit the search between relevan groups of
images, When I tested the layoutbranch when that was requested from the
community at the beginning of October. I had some CP issues in my projects
then, and I was thinking along you lines too.
I used APSCpp and I manually
Thanks for your Windows build Allard! I'm using it currently (alternating
with Yuv's layout-branch test build) and it works great so far for me.
I think it is good to get something out there for windows like you've
done, and then we can perfect the releases based on that. The wiki and
2009/10/22 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net
Also, added photos inherit the same position as the first photo in
the project, so they are always hidden in the Preview initially - A
fixed drag-and-drop would use the mouse location to place the photo.
A nice way to handle this is to let
2009/10/22 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net
The preferred interface for specifying input to control point
generators is to supply a .pto project. There would be no problem
also supplying any masks in this project file, the control point
generator would have to be able to read them though.
2009/10/23 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net
On Fri 23-Oct-2009 at 12:37 +0200, Oskar Sander wrote:
Have there ever been a discussion on showing dependencies in the pto files
to help CP-generators. I.e. image 1 overlaps image 2,3,4 without
specifying positions?
Specifying approximate
2009/10/19 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net
My understanding is that calibrate_lens produces output in a new
non-polynomial lens calibration system. It shouldn't be too
difficult to convert to Hugin/Panotools a,b,c format, but this
hasn't been done yet.
What documentation is available on the
is almost a scaling factor, and there is nothing
really controlling that the two groups end up on the same scale.
Cheers
O
2009/10/18 James Legg lankyle...@gmail.com
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:23 +0200, Oskar Sander wrote:
I have now tested with a bit bigger project, and get a very strange
I have now tested with a bit bigger project, and get a very strange result,
I need some help to see If I am doing something wrong, or it's a bug.
Iseems like there are phantom CP's in optimization that stuffs up the
result. These are visible in the layout-view but not in the CP-list.
(reported
Hi Pablo, in my quest to visualize the model I go on with a couple of
questions if you don't mind.
In the XYZ model an example w 3 cameras can look like in *illustration1 *
attached.
It is a 2D illustration, disregarding the Y dimension for the moment.
* 3 cameras with different Z X, and
Sounds like great ideas Yuv.
V
* Maximize effective image area within these windows regardless of full
screen or not is used(My intepretation of maximize footprint)
* Hey, these functions could even all coexist open as parallel V-window
instances!
W
* Concentrate condense controls and
That's a known bug (see previously in the thread). A workaround is to build
your project in Ad's version first, then copy the new binaries.
2009/10/12 Zoran Zorkic zo...@gmx.net
Crashes for me while adding photos (Nikon D90 jpegs) on Xp 32bit and
Vista 64bit.
I just copied your files over
I'd like to set up a Windows hugin development environment, but the
terrifying length of this thread is somewhat deterrent.
Do you recon your moving target is closing in?
/O
2009/10/11 J. Schneider j-schn...@gmx.de
First something you mentioned at the end of your mail:
I am starting to
to PrincipalPoint or Nadir?
http://www.r-s-c-c.org/rscc/v1m6images/pitch.jpg
Cheers
2009/10/10 Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de
Oskar Sander schrieb:
Pablo, when you said that you are working on this, did you refer to
the optimization strategy above, or the image-load-bug
So what I was getting at is that could it be that most of the problems of
the layout branch like: windows-image-read-crash, EXIF-bug,
cropfactor-FOV-bug, are actually code-baseline issues for that track that
would be mostly overcome after a merge into a more mature code-track.
While the really
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
