Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell00.bisx.prod.on.blackberry...
If I were to set them up from scratch, is the recommendation for a
monoplex to take the default of 8 or should maxsystem be set to 1?? Its
tough to find any information for the smaller monpolex
So, there's no plans at the moment.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
I wonder how long the SUSE preference will survive?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/03/microsoft_novell_suse_linux/
And for a giggle:
http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/6873/983/
Analysts are running around like beheaded chickens ...
http://www.miketheheadlesschicken.org/story.html
Hello,
I'm confused about the number of logical devices address by a Ficon
channel:
1) On Ficon Implementation Guide it's stated that The Ficon
implementation allows up to 16,384 device addresses per Ficon channel so
64 Logical Control Units.
2) On Ficon Native Implementation and Reference
Is it possible to statically call a C routine from a COBOL pgm?
Nothing more simple than that...
If yes can we also return the result of the C routine(statically
called) to the COBOL pgm.
Yes, but not through the RETURN-CODE special register.
Do i need to use #pragma for this?
I use #pragma
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/02/2006
at 03:39 AM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It seems reasonable that the field M1CC is defined as having length
5. If not, the programming is a mess. If so, the L'M1CC+1
specification is stupid.
No.
It's stupid because the expression already indicates
Hi Ed,
To answer your question nothing has been found despite an exhaustive search.
I hope to find something because it is scary. Maybe, some member of this board
had a similar experience and could share it with us. In the meanwhile the hunt
goes on.
Thanks again to all who
More news from PSI on the state of their commercial emulation solution.
The next few months seem to hold the potential for interesting
developments in this area.
Thanks, Sam
-Original Message-
From: Platform Solutions, Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006
Knutson, Sam wrote:
More news from PSI on the state of their commercial emulation solution.
The next few months seem to hold the potential for interesting
developments in this area.
Thanks, Sam
Interesting. Can you do a rough comparison of
PSI's offering to FLEX-ES and Hercules? Can
PWD
The PSI letter is intriguing. Will it reduce software costs? Will it
perform as well as its Big Blue cousin? Will it become a very viable
alternative to the server farm?
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Crawford Company
4680 N. Royal Atlanta
Tucker GA 30084
phone:
I'm currently experiencing the exact same error running the RESTORE job of
my z/OS 1.8 ServerPac install. It appears that the current Temporary File
System mounted at /tmp has too little file space (see PARM on your TFS
mount command in BPXPRMxx). As a workaround, I created a /tmp1 directory
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 6:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: The PSI Letter V4
Knutson, Sam wrote:
More news from PSI on the state of their
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 6:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Static IP or DHCP?
We're a fairly small shop toying with the idea of
implementing DHCP.
I'm
You don't even have to go to IBM first.
If you Google for LOOKAT, you get the URL
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chris Mason
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
snip
Thus I keyed www.ibm.com and entered
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:58:42 -0800, Mark Prince
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'No servers in the access plan carry this newsgroup'.
To verify that your server is in the news access plan check two
locations:
Tools | servers and accounts | news servers | your server
[x]enable server for online
Thanks to everyone who responsed to our Receive Order problem.
We added GLOBALTCPIPDATA, GLOBALIPNODES, and COMMONSEARCH for RESOLVER.
It fixed the problem and our Receive Order ran fine.
Also, we authorized the PING command by added it to AUTHCMD in IKJTSOxx.
Dick
Very helpful information
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:10:02 -0600, Cal McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mount command in BPXPRMxx). As a workaround, I created a /tmp1 directory
and mounted a new '/tmp1/' TFS to it with a much larger amount of file
space.
Correction: should be '/tmp1' TFS (no slash at the end).
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 07:18:16 -0700, Jeffrey D. Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't understand is if IBM won't allow z/OS to run on
a Hercules system, then why would IBM allow z/OS to run on
a PSI system?
Better legal representation and past history. Remember a company
called Amdahl?
In a message dated 11/3/2006 7:14:10 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To answer your question nothing has been found despite an exhaustive
search. I hope to find something because it is scary. Maybe, some member of
this
board had a similar experience and could
John McKown said
We definately use DHCP.
I even use it on my 4 PC LAN at home. But my Router/Firewall has a
DHCP
server built into it. I have hard coded my MAC addresses into the
DHCP
server, so a particular PC always gets the same IP address. Why do I
do
it this way? Centralized control of
Sounds good, but how do I specify a large amount of space for the /tmp1 and
its TFS.
John Norgauer
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING.. Guilty, until proven innocent !! JN 2004
In a recent note, John Norgauer said:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 3 08:42:21 2006
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 07:34:03 -0800
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
From: John Norgauer
In a recent note, John Norgauer said:
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 07:34:03 -0800
Sounds good, but how do I specify a large amount of space for the /tmp1 and
its TFS.
If you have SMP/E v3r2 or higher, use SMPWKDIR instead.
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
I'm not sure how many receive the PSI Newsletter, but in case you don't, I've
appended the V4
text. There's nothing new in it - it's amazing how many people think they can
re-boil old
material and dupe gullible reporters.
(One copy is enough, guys!)
I may be proved wrong. I believe it's
--snip-
Suffice to say that it was once proposed that the Add Register
instruction code, X'1A', could be used as a positive packed
decimal 1
Perhaps in ASCII mode, which no longer exists. Certainly not in EBCDIC
mode.
Jeffrey D. Smith wrote:
What I don't understand is if IBM won't allow z/OS to run on
a Hercules system, then why would IBM allow z/OS to run on
a PSI system?
Perhaps because PSI is an established company, like FSI (Flex/ES) and UMX.
If a company was marketing a packaged solution based on
In a recent note, Paul Gilmartin said:
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:48:01 -0700
In a recent note, John Norgauer said:
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 07:34:03 -0800
Sounds good, but how do I specify a large amount of space for the /tmp1 and
its TFS.
If you have SMP/E v3r2 or
snip
Interesting. Can you do a rough comparison of PSI's offering to FLEX-ES
and Hercules? Can PWD people get the software at low cost for all three
platforms (well, I know right now that Hercules cannot legally run z/OS
without some special dispensation).
Clever term open mainframe, but what
Phil, I thought you'd give them a bit longer than that based on your
earlier post. Even Mike the Chicken got 18 months!!! :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Phil Payne
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:44 AM
To:
I rarely bother with the Search box on www.ibm.com, because it only
rarely comes up with what I'm looking for. I usually get either nothing or
several thousand hits in no particular order. Maybe what I'm looking for
is burried in there somewhere, but can I find it before retirement?
Tim
On
On 11/3/06, Phil Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nothing adds up with PSI. Nothing. I hear random, unsupported comments -
supposedly from IBM executives - about PSI never getting license agreements
because we don't deal with patent infringers.
On 3 Nov 2006 08:09:13 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pommier, Rex
R.) wrote:
Apparently their definition of open mainframe means it runs on an
Intel processor. From their press release it is running on an
industry-standard Intel Itanium 2. Since when was the Itanic an
industry standard?
Define
And everyone wondered why Charles retired so soon (he's a decent basketball
player), and his brother
Tony just up and quit years ago.
I just hope that orange jump-suits remain in style for several years!
Sincerely,
Scott Barry
SBBWorks, Inc.
-- ex-JSI, Morino/LEGENT (and twice acquired by CA
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:18:37 -0800, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious what most corporate networks look like. Are most of you on
this list doing DHCP? Or are most of you using static IP?
A mixed of both
All our 300+ servers ( Sysplex ,AIX, Windows,Linux) are using fixed addresses
Tim
I hope you know not to accept the first selection but to redefine your
Search by clicking on Advanced Search - advanced is relative - and
replace the any of the words option with the the exact phrase option -
unless of course, you have entered only one word, in which case it had
better be
The Hipersockets is strictly internal, and requires the user to point with
the actual IP address.
The FTP is using the external 10.x.x.x links, and those are connected to a
DNS. We can actually get from one LPAR to another LPAR using the domain
names, but that does not use the Hipersockets.
The
Antonio,
Both limit applies independently.
FICON support 16k devices, however FICON attached CU can contain max 256
LCUs. Theoretically it gives you (256*25616K) more than FICON can support.
The same story with ESCON: 1024 devices, but up to 16 LCUs.
Last but not least: using director (switch)
Craddock, Chris wrote:
?snip
Most of my house guests bring their laptops (they're usually geeks too)
and they can choose between wired or wireless access. It would be a
royal PITA to have to add/remove their MAC addresses to the firewall
before they could get access.
?snip
CC
It is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 10:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: The PSI Letter V4
On 3 Nov 2006 08:09:13 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pommier, Rex
R.) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ramiro Camposagrado
I didn't see right away that you were trying to invoke the
64bit version JAVA 1.4. I found this APAR on IBMLINK: PK24855
[ snip ]
LOCAL FIX:
Increase your REGION size. That is, when
Great! I've been hitting the same wall for the last two days. Same reason
as everyone else.
After some fumbling, I finally figured out it was the /tmp filesystem
causing the problem.
I created a new one with 2500 cylinders primary, and 500 cylinder
secondaries G. Mounted it at the /tmp
So, how do you explain the fact that they have demonstrated
running z/OS on one of their machines. Where did that licence
come from.
Giggle.
This is part of the fun. One of three licenses (allegedly) purchased online
via a loophole in
IBM's sytems and somewhat questionably transnationally
Hello:
The manual
z/OS DFSMSdfp Storage Administration Reference Publication No. SC26-7402 in
chapter 7 'Defining Data Classes' there is this statement:
However, SMS does not retroactively apply your changes to previously
allocated data sets.
I have an example that contradicts this:
I
Every year, we FTP some files from the mainframe to an ASCII Unix server
where the zip software is Gzip.The feds though want to pick up these
files in either WinZip or PKZip format (in ASCII), so we FTP the files
to a PC, zip them by hand, then put them back on the server.
Last year the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Zip problems
Every year, we FTP some files from the mainframe to an ASCII
Unix server
where
I'm seeing a situation where my full volume dump tapes are not being
returned to scratch. I have exit ARCTVEXT in place for CA-TLMS but no dump
tapes are being returned to scratch. I have the dumpclass set up with
autoreuse and the tapedeletion value is scratch. When does HSM actually do
the
Hello all,
I want to get a list of RACF records that shows what
profiles (user, dataset, etc.) were delete on a daily
basis.
I'm assuming (yes, I know how you spell that) that one
gets that information out of SMF...some how.
Would any one have some JCL which would help me fast
path my way to
Paul,
Perhaps, the manual doesn't explain this well. If you activate DVC in
an existing dataclass, then the datasets that currently exist that have
that dataclass defined will not benefit. However, once the DVC has been
activated in the dataclass, then any new allocations will be able to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 12:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Need Help With to Extract SMF RACF Records
Hello all,
I want to get a list of RACF records
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Hello all,
I want to get a list of RACF records that shows what profiles
(user, dataset, etc.) were delete on a daily basis.
I'm assuming (yes, I know how you spell that) that one gets
that
Why not just install gzip on z/OS? There's a USS version available.
Tim Hare
Senior Systems Programmer
Florida Department of Transportation
(850) 414-4209
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
On 11/3/2006 1:36 PM, Howard Rifkind wrote:
I want to get a list of RACF records that shows what
profiles (user, dataset, etc.) were delete on a daily
basis.
I'm assuming (yes, I know how you spell that) that one
gets that information out of SMF...some how.
Would any one have some JCL which
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Hare
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Zip problems
Why not just install gzip on z/OS? There's a USS version available.
Tim Hare
Good afternoon everyone.
I am looking for the JES2 Data Area manuals for z/OS 1.7 or 1.8. Does anyone
know where I can find them or are they unchanged from the previous version of
the manuals? I've search library server and z/OS 1.7 Book Manager disks to no
avail. They don't appear in the
If you ever have to expand, it's a SYSPLEX wide cold-start.
Really, I don't think so
It was when we had to do it!
I only had to do it once, and that was one time too often.
I always recommend going with 32.
(PS: Why would I want to have to re-allocate everything?
A little up front planning,
On 3 Nov 2006 11:42:30 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Why not just install gzip on z/OS? There's a USS version available.
The feds don't want ASCII WinZIP or PKZIP format, they can't read gzip
format.
--
For
MEMLIMIT changed to 2G, this resolved the problem.
Thanks
Matt Dazzo
Technical Services
Publishers Clearing House
516-944-4816
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/2/2006 4:36 PM
I just tried it with MEMLIMIT set to 256M and it worked !!!
(I had MEMLIMIT set to 128M on my sand-box LPAR)
I'm not quite sure about the direction of this thread, but if you have
java installed on the mainframe, you can use jar to zip up your files.
jar files are the same type along the lines of desktop winzip stuff. Yes,
the terminology is confusing. A lot of the flags are the same as for tar.
On Friday, 11/03/2006 at 05:43 GMT, Phil Payne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I''m sure aßhole (an IBM lawyer) would be happy to tell you more.
Can the juvenile name-calling, Phil. You made the same comment
previously. It was offensive then, and it remains so now, esp. since I
work with IBM
Phil, I thought you'd give them a bit longer than that based on your earlier
post
I did. A couple of years ago I gave them two years. Tick, tock.
There's a whole mash of stuff in this.
Marketing - against what ever IBM decides to do - is always gonna be tough.
You're not taking
on a
In a recent note, Matthew Stitt said:
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:17:05 -0600
The problem dataset (first one) is the SMPPTS. Get past that and everything
else should be no problem.
? But that's not a HFS file.
Great list! First I've heard of the SMPWKDIR file. I'll use it next
In a recent note, Howard Brazee said:
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:51:19 -0700
Every year, we FTP some files from the mainframe to an ASCII Unix server
where the zip software is Gzip.The feds though want to pick up these
files in either WinZip or PKZip format (in ASCII), so we FTP
We frequently receive the $HASP050 JQES shortage message.
*$HASP050 JES2 RESOURCE SHORTAGE OF,JQES,- 90% UTILIZATION REACHED
It starts out at 85% and goes up to as high as 92% before going back
down.
I have done some reading and searching on the subject and found that
What would be the best way to zip these files for the feds?
I've got a project just like that. IRS FIRE System. Sound familiar ???
What I'm thinking about now is NFS the zServer file so I can get at it from
a Windows box and ZIP it from there. I just dreamt this up yesterday
though, so I'm
On 3 Nov 2006 12:41:38 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Gilmartin)
wrote:
A way (best is subject to discussion) is use /bin/cp to copy
them to an HFS directory structure conformant with the recipients'
requirements; /bin/pax to convert to ASCII, info-zip to zip,
then FTP to server. Only the last
Howard,
We use infozip for this kind of thing. It will convert the data to ascii
and write
out a fixed length dataset. We then ftp using binary (image) mode to
whereever.
The install file is xmit format. I just ftp'ed it to my system, did a
receive and
away we went.
Regards,
John
I have a job on z/OS 1.4 which uses tape (3490). The step runs a user
program which appears to run to competition OK, but the job steps ends as
follows:
IEF142I USTXISOP USTXISOP ISOATEDG - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE 3592
I am having difficulty finding what this condition codes means. It
Group,
This might seems like a funny question.
How do you move the command line in SDSF to the top. This isn't the
same as the ISPF PDF settings (option '0').
Thanks,
Martin Strudwick
NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is
intended by the
Issue command SETTINGS, and remove the slash from Command line at
bottom. This works for any ISPF application.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Strudwick, Martin
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 4:36 PM
To:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ten Eyck
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 3:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: COND CODE 3592
I have a job on z/OS 1.4 which uses tape (3490). The step runs a user
program
OUTDEF relates to JOES not JQES (note that the value displayed is JOENUM).
JOBDEF parameter JOBNUM is associated with JQES. There should be some info
on these commands in the JES2 Commands manual for your version of OS/390.
Bill
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 15:52:25 -0500, Sabo, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:35:39 -0800, Strudwick, Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Group,
This might seems like a funny question.
How do you move the command line in SDSF to the top. This isn't the
same as the ISPF PDF settings (option '0').
Not funny... but it has been asked many
I went back and looked at my ServerPac variables, and the SMPWKDIR is
listed. It defaults to /tmp.
Not knowing the impact of this variable then, I left it as is. Next time
I'll change it.
And yes, you will need to mount a filesystem at the mountpoint you define
for the variable. A VERY LARGE
Is it possible the program is not clearing register 15 to zero before
returning to the operating system?
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 15:32:48 -0600, Peter Ten Eyck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a job on z/OS 1.4 which uses tape (3490). The step runs a user
program which appears to run to competition
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/03/2006
at 09:44 AM, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anyone who has spent a significant time looking at dumps of
application code will verify: quite often, instruction streams can
be confused with data areas,
Not in this case. You won't see 1A in a packed
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/02/2006
at 10:31 AM, Greg Shirey [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
When I started HZSPROC again, I was surprised to see no changes.
Message IEFC001I stated:
PROCEDURE HZSPROC WAS EXPANDED USING INSTREAM PROCEDURE DEFINITION
You have an instream proc in your JCL, and that
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 11/02/2006
at 09:43 PM, Lindy Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Correct me, please, if I am wrong, but if you telnet to port 25 you
get to TSO, but if you rlogin to port 513 you get to USS. No?
No. Unformatted System Services[1][2] determines what application you
get
On 2 Nov 2006 16:18:47 -0800,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Jaffe) wrote:
We're a fairly small shop toying with the idea of implementing DHCP.
I'm not uncomfortable with the static IP network we have now. But, I
agree DHCP would be nice. There seem to be some challenges associated
with it, not the
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 13:35 -0800, Strudwick, Martin wrote:
How do you move the command line in SDSF to the top. This isn't the
same as the ISPF PDF settings (option '0').
Happens after exiting ish ???.
Just drop out of SDSF and get back in.
settings settings have no effect.
Easy fix is to
I ran into what looked like this sometime last week.
My mistake was compressing a load library with such a module from my
z/OS 1.7 system. As this library was shared with my systems still on
z/OS 1.4, they were also broken.
Dave Gibney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System
I've noticed IBM's default CTIx parmlib members have TRACEOPTS On. Should
I be going into these members and turning traceopts to off? I doubt I need all
of the tracing overhead. What do others do? Thanks for any help.
In the early days of SMS, the data class mainly provided defaults for
things like RECFM/LRECL/BLKSIZE, VSAM attributes, space attributes,
etc. Those were used at allocation time but never used again.
Since then various things have been added to the data class which are
not stored in the
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 15:32:48 -0600, Peter Ten Eyck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a job ... The step runs a user
program which appears to run to competition OK, but the job steps ends as
follows:
IEF142I USTXISOP USTXISOP ISOATEDG - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE 3592
I am having difficulty
Well, you might, if you were debugging a S0C7.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Assembler question
Not in this
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 08:33 -0500, Knutson, Sam wrote:
More news from PSI on the state of their commercial emulation solution.
The next few months seem to hold the potential for interesting
developments in this area.
Saw this first thing this morning, and thought - Sam letting us
all
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:40:58 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/19/2006
at 10:34 AM, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The issue is that AC=1 programs expect to be called as job-step
programs and may not completely clean up after
Peter
John McKown and Matthew Stitt have almost certainly provided the explanation
of what has happened.
It's always worth taking a good close look at the explanation of the message
which is puzzling you before panicking.
Since this is a user program it's almost certain that the user was
Hi all,
Our shop plan to replace the 2 sets of IBM model 2064-2C5 machine and we
are connected by parallel sysplex with sysplex timer 9037-002. I found
the model S18 with two books will be a good choice but I have the following
question?
S18 model
MCMs=2
available PUs=24
Max availabel
On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 01:37 -0500, Alan Altmark wrote:
Before making any assumptions, a customer with questions about IBM
software may want to contact IBM.
Pity customer(s) are perceived to be so bloody stupid that this even
needs to be stated.
I not necessarily disagreeing mind you, just
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 01:37:33 -0500, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please note that no PSI machines are listed at
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/library/swpriceinfo/hardware.html
. Before making any assumptions, a customer with questions about IBM
software may want to
90 matches
Mail list logo
