-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: First ipl of z/OS 1.9
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
>
>
> No work wait.
>
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Language Environment runtime options and system dumps
Interesting, but it doesn't really help except to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 12:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: REXX HI vs HE
This is a hare-brained idea, but I wonder if there could be something
in my shop (my las
I've run into a problem where I have TN3270 sessions attached to a VTAM
session manager.
The problem is this: When the system, where the VTAM session manager is
running, is at 100% for extended periods (5 minutes or more), AND, you
have a TSO session on the system where the session manager is, AND
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: TCP Settings for KeepAlive
Hmmm.. almost sounds like QWS3270 may be getting impatient when waiting
for
Yes, the common item to this problem is the Session manager. We were
just discussing this among ourselves just a few minutes ago.
If QWS is connected directly to the TSO APPLIDs (as opposed to going
through the session manager first), then these timeouts do not happen.
However, because of a few
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 4:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Another one bites the dust
IBM used to give huge discounts to universities. About 15-20 or so years
a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Bill Klein
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Fw: Language Environment runtime options and system dumps
I would check with any vendor as to whether this
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Michael Knigge
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 5:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Question about REUS=NONE
But I wonder how to migrate the ASM-Subs nearly painless I could
rewrite al
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 3:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Planned IBMLink Outage July 10-11
On 8 Jul 2009 10:01:22 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>
Sent from my Dick Tracy Two-Way Wrist Radio.
Nanny Nanny Boo Boo!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Johnson, Larry W.
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 12:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 10 Jul 2009
-Original Message-
I had something to do with that. My concern is that system
programs are usually reading that book at a time when they are
dealing with the gravity of some problem, and may not be in a mood
to appreciate its opposite, levity.
And we all know how humorless those "
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 11:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Article Mainframe Stolen
>From the Palistine Herold in Palestine TX. This was repeated in the
Enterpr
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Bob Woodside
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 3:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Find the computer error
On Wednesday 15 July 2009, Roach, Dennis (N-GHG) wrote:
> One too many digits
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 12:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM error messages getting worse?
--- On Thu, 7/9/09, Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
From: Patrick O'Keefe
Subj
Sorry, that "reply" was the result of a comedy of errors.
Suffice to say that having multiple displays and M/S deciding that it
will take focus... Well it resulted in the focus changing to Outlook
with the mouse over the wrong "SEND" button (I had more than one reply
screen up)...
And my thought
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 2:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Article Mainframe Stolen
There is no more worse than worst.
So does that mean that wurst is chop
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 2:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Find the computer error
Ted MacNEIL pisze:
>> Well, my understanding is that American English uses terms
>> a l
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 4:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Submit a JCL from within another JCL
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:17:38 +0200, CUNY Yann wrote:
>You can u
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Arthur Gutowski
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 7:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Article Mainframe Stolen
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:19:08 -0400, Thompson, Steve
wrote:
>-Origi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: LE options
There appears to be (at least) two ways to change LE runtime options
system wide.
There's the a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Chris Mason
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Mainframe hacking
The interpretation Howard, Jim and Bruno arrived at is, of course, total
nonsense, c
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Anthony Giorgio
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Offload work to zIIP with zPRIME
Hal Merritt wrote:
> Old days? Still very much so today here in the
quot;
I
have no idea - perhaps the writer didn't checking the wind direction ...
Perhaps considering "listiquette" before posting is to be recommended.
As long as I am attacked on this point, I will repel with equal vigour.
Chris Mason
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:33:15 -0400, Thompson, St
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Bott, Steven
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 4:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Operator Validation before Executing Command
We recently experienced an outage due to an operator command
bei
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of esst...@juno.com
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 8:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Mainframe Utility for EBCDIC to ASCII conversion
This may have been discussed before,
Is anyone aware o
However, I was unable to find this on the US PTO site. That makes me
think that this is filed in the area that is not available for
publication for some months (I forgot the legally mandated number).
So, it appears to not be viewable by the public at this point.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-Orig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: DASD: to share or not to share
As part of our migration to z/OS from z/VSE we have started a discuss
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Scott Rowe
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DASD: to share or not to share
I think the real question here is: Why don't you have a SYSPLEX? There
n message
<45d79eacefba9b428e3d400e924d36b902557...@iwdubcormsg007.sci.local>,
"Thompson,
Steve" wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Scott Rowe
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:44 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.e
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 1:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DASD: to share or not to share
>
It is VSAM Record Level Sharing (not Locking).
Within CICS it
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 4:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: USS misuse (was Re: Mainframe hacking)
>Ted
>> Even IBM used USS ...
>Sadly, some IBMers are as carele
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 4:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Concatenations and blocksizes
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:20:53 -0500, Mark Zelden
wrote:
>...
>"CONCA
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 1:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IBM Satisfaction surveys (Was: The "Shame" Approach)
[Patrick O'Keefe Kicks open the door]
The one
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 4:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Multi-file tape
This worked OK on a virtual tape. Now I must make
it work on a physical tape. My EXEC s
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 11:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Multi-file tape
Thanks. Easy enough. An off-list communication described this:
MOUNT [dev
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 3:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM halves mainframe Linux engine prices
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:24:56 -0600, Mark Post wrote:
He als
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 6:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: The Death of Servers and Software
Hewlett-Packard reported its 3Q earnings earlier today:
http://h3026
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 7:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF Counter
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:56:07 -0400, Dave Salt wrote:
>
>The only way you could get the t
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 8:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF Counter
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:21:46 -0400, Thompson, Steve wrote:
>
>Why is the sky blu
Duly ignored.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Anthony Fletcher
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 5:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Test Posting, please ignore
Test only
-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Chris Mason
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 8:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ist663i suppression
You may or may not be familiar with the English expression, "using a
sledgehammer
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Chris Mason
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 1:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Catering for ESLs (was Re: ist663i suppression)
Steve
Well, I had hoped it was clear that a simple, surgica
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Doc Farmer
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 8:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Dumb Question - Credit Card Number Scanner
Okay, this one came to me yesterday. Somebody asked me if the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 11:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: LLA Update
Peter Relson wrote:
> LLA manages only load libraries (whether PDS or PDSE).
>
Is
Seems that Eloqua is Firefox unfriendly, so this link can only be read
from a computer system running Windows and IE.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-- Opinions expressed by this poster may not reflect those of poster's
employer --
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Andreas F. Geissbuehler
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 9:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: [turnkey-mvs] turnkey mvs and cobol/jcl environment
I second Jo on this and URGE YOU t
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Umamaheshwar Iyer
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 7:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 33 Years In IT/Security/Audit
I started mine on a WANG-VS which was user friendly. After the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Is there any concern when added real memory from 5G to 7G
Apples and oranges.
The only meaningf
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 2:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Long parms ... again (was: Reading DD card information)
Whatever technique used to pass a long par
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 10:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Long parms ... again (was: Reading DD card information)
You are missing the point.
The APF
"Thompson, Steve"
wrote:
:>-Original Message-
:>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
:>Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
:>Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 10:07 AM
:>To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:>Subject: Re: Long parms ... again (was:
, Thompson, Steve <
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com> wrote:
>
> Might I suggest that you are being a bit myopic? Or perhaps suffering
> from tunnel vision?
>
> APF programs are to be written to a higher standard.
>
> From what you have written, you believe that if someone passe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Dave Day
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Ownership of PC routines---what I will do
Has been an interesting discussion. What I originally wanted to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Michael Knigge
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 3:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Does a DD-Statement "waste memory" after dealloc?
All,
I currently try to find a obscure memory leak i
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Eric Chevalier
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 3:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Calulators or Computers? (Was: Outsourcing your Computer Center
to IBM ?)
On 13 Oct 2009 07:30:14 -0700
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 8:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: PSW question
"Packed ASCII"? That sounds "interesting", do you know where I could
find a definati
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM book prices
>) It's easier to take hardcopy to the bathroom, and it has all these
chapters you'l
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of larry macioce
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 6:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
Who else produces mainframes What is the
Congrats.
I've been working with different people who are looking. It is really
tough out there.
Hopefully you will be able to continue to have access to IBM-Main.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 3:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Fwd: Is There Such a Thing as a Mainframe Monopoly?
-
...@stercomm.com (Thompson,
Steve) wrote:
>Please tell me what you consider to be malicious actions.
>
>Would suing a company and then buying them out to keep from losing the
>case meet your definition?
Not mine.You can't buy a company that doesn't accept your bid.
If t
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John P. Baker
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 9:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: big iron mainframe vs. x86 servers
The big advantages of the IBM mainframe architecture have alway
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 1:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
I've been doing this almost since my first PC. Since I've always
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC - DELL CUSTOMER SUPPORT
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:40:44 -0400, Thompson, Steve
wrote
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 9:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Secret Service plans IT reboot
Why is it called a memory leak? I think that's a distributed term. We
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Joe Reichman
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: EZASMI Concurrent Server cann't handle mutiple open connections
in the same port
Hi,
All regarding
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Gabe Goldberg
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: web: Global CIO: As IBM Preps For Justice's Probe, Who Started
This Nonsense? -- ...
Here's a slant on
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 12:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: asynchronous file open?
This is likely a crazy question. But I'm wondering if anybody has come
up w=
it
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 3:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What SVCs are in use?
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:23:55 -0600, Andy Wood
wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:16
This reminds me of PL/1. Designed and implemented by committee.
How about writing it up, and if you are a SHARE member, submitting it
for a vote. Let IBM decide how they are going to deal with it (they will
any way, given my experience with JES2 development).
But, this is just one person's opin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 12:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: An Alternative Modest PARM Proposal
On 4 Nov 2009 09:02:35 -0800, cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca (Cla
I have been searching manuals, books (MVS Power Programming, Invitation
to MVS), searching the red books site, etc. and I can not find where an
ESTAE (or ESTAEX) gets anchored.
Does anyone know where these get anchored in a task structure?
When looking at a dump under IPCS, I can see the SC
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ESTAE/ESTAEX are anchored, where?
TCBSTAB points to the SCB stack.
Thanks.
Right after send
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ESTAE/ESTAEX are anchored, where?
One possibility - your program set an ESTAE, then called anoth
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 5:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IPv6 or Regional registry IPv4 address exhaustion...
How many of you have implemented IPv6? Time grows
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John Dawes
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SIGNIFICANCE OF (+0),DISP=OLD
I am trying to trouble shoot a problem.=A0 The user's job received a :
bba...@iwdubcormsg007.sci.local>,
on
11/11/2009
at 03:16 PM, "Thompson, Steve" said:
>I have been searching manuals, books (MVS Power Programming, Invitation
>to MVS), searching the red books site, etc. and I can not find where an
>ESTAE (or ESTAEX) gets anchored.
Does FESTAE stil
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 7:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBM driving mainframe systems programmers into the ground
>From this, what IBM wants is for the z t
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 9:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Opinion time: SMF data in XML format?
Thank you very much for that information. I wonder why managem
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 1:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Mainframe running 1,500 Linux servers?
IIRC, an experiment was done a few years back to see how ma
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of David Shein
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Reentrant Programs and Protected Storage
I grew up believing that if a program is link edited as reent
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Alex UMX
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Check out Computer glitch to cause flight delays across
U.S. - Mar ketWatch
Well, 99.999% reliability
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of HUTCHISON Gregory
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to
Accenture
Accenture is out for Accen
age-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
>
>
>
> I am so glad you brought this up.
>
> Does anyone remember who Accenture was?
Arthur Andersen, IIRC.
Arthur Anderson Consulting, and one should then ask/remember why they
changed their
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 11:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Small Server Mob Advantage
Chase, John wrote:
> Frequently the problem is not that the informat
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 9:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to
Accenture
>And it is no longer
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Anne & Lynn Wheeler
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 11:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Now is time for banks to replace core system according to
Accenture
The following message is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 5:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: file definition
This may or may not be a weird question, but...
Is there a utility where I can give it
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 9:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEC143I 213-30
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:53:26 -0500, Scott Rowe wrote:
>I don't believe that's true,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lloyd Fuller
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 2:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: "Portable" data centers (was RE: Small Server Mob
Advantage)
What do you mean Sun was the first?
The
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Joe Aulph
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 2:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Write JES data to an external data set?
Hello all,
I have a user that want to, as part of a batch process,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 1:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Small Server Mob Advantage
Before Samuel Morse, they were all wireless.
We are coming to a t
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Martin Kline
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Could DSNAME length restriction be bypassed if catalog allowed
longer ALIAS names?
I'm just throwing thi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Kline, Martin
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 3:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Could DSNAME length restriction be bypassed if catalog
allowed longer ALIAS names?
I'm glad you p
I was looking back in the archives at posts discussing PSATOLD being
zero.
The one thing pointed out is, in a dump, when processing by IPCS, one
could see PSATOLD for a processor being zero.
The problem is, we are examining PSATOLD while running. We are not using
SRBs directly, so our code
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: PSATOLD = 0 when under "PRB" !?!?
Thompson, Steve wrote:
> So the question that I h
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: PSATOLD = 0 when under "PRB" !?!?
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:56:58 -0500 "Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: PSATOLD = 0 when under "PRB" !?!?
Steve
There is that pseudo-SRB mode state that Peter Relson talke
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 8:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: PSATOLD = 0 when under "PRB"
While "pseudo-SRB" mode does exist, it basically applies only to use o
101 - 200 of 984 matches
Mail list logo
