Me neither. Nothing on VSE-L. Strange.
Michael Horlick
CGI Montreal
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Frank M. Ramaekers
Sent: Wed 29/06/2011 9:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: VSE-L ListServ dead?
There hasn't been any postings on
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM TCP/IP I/O error?
On Friday, 05/20/2011 at 02:02 EDT, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
This morning we received the following message on the console of a TCPIP
machine:
DTCPKT089I Device LCS3: LAN task net type 1 adapter number 0
Greetings,
This morning we received the following message on the console of a TCPIP
machine:
DTCPKT089I Device LCS3: LAN task net type 1 adapter number 0 was interrupted;
restarting device
I was told by IBM that this is a hardware issue presumably on the OSA card. How
can I find out the
Sent: Fri 20/05/2011 2:09 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM TCP/IP I/O error?
Call your IBM CE!
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 11:00 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Mark Pace
Sent: Fri 20/05/2011 2:35 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM TCP/IP I/O error?
Do you process your EREP data? It should be there.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Horlick, Michael michael.horl
Greetings,
We have a problem with OSPF/MPROUTE which could be some sort of I/O error (at
least that what the EZZ messages seems to indicate and what IBM has determined).
Has anyone used the DEBUG/TRACE with MPROUTE? It says in the TCP/IP Diagnosis
Guide for the trace/debug
1.
We use absloute shares for all our VSEs to guarentee them CPU time, no
LIMITHARD. I manually do a LIMITHARD on a VSE machine when the CPU is close to
100% due to probably many batch jobs running in one VSE. This is done so that
our CMS users get some time. Once the CPU goes down, usually
Greetings,
Just a little update on a question/problem I had last month. I had an issue
that when I changed my CPU I couldn't communicate using one of my TCP/IP stacks
to the clients network using VIPA/MPROUTE.
Last night we did a successful migration and it seems that what was needed to
here: http://listserv.uark.edu/ARCHIVES/IBMVM.HTML
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: January 25, 2011 11:17
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: An update on an earlier issue and how to search VMESA
engineers have had to clear ARP cache in similar situations.
Its now a standard item in our migration plans.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 11:17 AM
To: IBMVM
Greetings,
I have a user who would like to have his userid displayed instead of the system
identifier in the status area at the bottom of the screen. Is that possible?
He has quite a few 3270 VM/CMS sessions open and would like to quickly identify
who is logged on to what screen.
Thanks,
PM, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
Greetings,
I have a user who would like to have his userid displayed instead of the
system identifier in the status area at the bottom of the screen. Is that
possible?
He has quite a few 3270 VM/CMS sessions open and would like to quickly
Greetings,
A couple of days ago we tried to migrate from our current CPU (Z800 - Model
2066) to a z9BC Mode R07 (2096).
We had this new machine for a couple of weeks and we created a copy of our z/VM
5.4 system on it (XXXRES = 540RES, XXXPAG = 540PAGetc...). I was able to test
z/VM 5.4
network
and firewall people involved.
Larry Davis
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:21 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Problems with MPROUTE going from z800 to z9BC
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:21 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Problems with MPROUTE going from z800 to z9BC computer
Greetings,
A couple of days ago we
together then you will have routing issues.
Just get a new set of IP's to test with on the new box, and get your =
network and firewall people involved.
Larry Davis
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
=
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent
Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:21 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Problems with MPROUTE going from z800 to z9BC computer
Greetings,
A couple of days ago we tried to migrate from our current CPU (Z800 -
Model
not be in the routing
tables.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems with MPROUTE going from z800 to z9BC computer
computer
On Wednesday, 12/15/2010 at 08:21 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
Come migration time however, we could not get the VIPA/MPROUTE
functionality
working. I could not ping from within the mainframe to anything beyond
the OSA
card. Tried both QDIO and non-QDIO mode
: Problems with MPROUTE going from z800 to z9BC computer
On Wednesday, 12/15/2010 at 08:21 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
Come migration time however, we could not get the VIPA/MPROUTE
functionality
working. I could not ping from within the mainframe to anything beyond
the OSA
,
Mike Horlick
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tue 14/12/2010 5:03 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: New messages from TCP/IP after going from z/VM 5.2 to 5.4
On Tuesday, 12/14/2010 at 04:19 EST, Horlick, Michael
Greetings,
We went from z/VM 5.2 to 5.4 (and TCP/IP for VM 520 to 540) at the end of
November. I didn't notice it at first but I see that I am getting the following
type extra messages on the spooled console for each of my TCP/IP stacks that I
have:
04:09:23 DTCARP049I An ARP packet was
, 12/14/2010 at 04:19 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
We went from z/VM 5.2 to 5.4 (and TCP/IP for VM 520 to 540) at the end
of
November. I didn't notice it at first but I see that I am getting the
following
type extra messages on the spooled console for each of my TCP/IP
Greetings,
My client is trying to FTP a file from VSE to a z/OS system through an
intermediary NT server. Since I do not have a z/OS system to play with I have
been trying to get the file from this server from VM/CMS.
In VSE I specified
// EXEC FTPBATCH,SIZE=1M,PARM='ID=01,UNIX=BIN'
try ftping something text from your pc to mvs and see if it accepts
it
Good luck
mace
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 2:56 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Greetings,
I would like to determine a date in the future through an EXEC.
Example: We IPL VM every 28 days. Last time was Sept 8,2010. I would like to
determine the date of the next VM IPL. Have the same need for VSE IPL and CICS
re-boot times.
Thank you,
Mike Horlick
CGI Montreal
Thanks to all who responded.
Mike
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Mon 20/09/2010 10:25 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Calculating a date in the future
On 09/20/2010 09:18 AM, Horlick, Michael wrote
EXPRESSED AS JULIAN
' DYEAR||NDAYS
exit
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-363-5050
ext 35050
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 9:19 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Thanks to all who responded to my question(s). Much appreciated.
Mike Horlick
Greetings,
We are currently running z/VM 5.2 and have z/VM 5.4 under test in a second
level machine. We are pretty stable in our environment.
There is a possibility within a year or so that we will be getting a z10.
Should we go to 5.4 or 6.1?
Are they any advantages in waiting for the new
AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 5.4 or 6.1 on new z10
Mike,
zVM 6.1 requires a z10, so you can't go to 6.1 until you have a z10.
5.2 is unsupported, so the decision is do I run unsupported until I
get a z10?.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl
Greetings,
I have a character field for example 0001A735 (PRK)
I have record like this 'DATA DATA '. I want to replace '' with
x'0001A735'.
Tried :
String = '||PRK||'x
JCL.J = Overlay(String,Record,WORK,4)
Where work = position of '' in record
Not working.
Thanks, That did it.
Mike Horlick
Conseiller
CGI Gestion Intégrée des Technologies
1350 Boul. René-Lévesque Ouest
Montréal, Qc, H3G 1T4
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Mark Wheeler
Sent: April 30, 2010
Greetings,
Yesterday afternoon we had one of our tape operators accidently FORCE off a VSE
machine. We noticed he had Class A in his directory.
If we remove class A what CP commands will he now be unable to perform? Is
there a list of CP Class A commands somewhere?
Thanks,
Mike
MDISKBLK READ' fm dop '!Var DopRec'
'PIPE VAR DOPREC!CHOP 64!FMTFST ISO!cons'
2010/3/9 Horlick, Michael michael.horl...@cgi.com
Greetings,
I would like to know if there is a CMS command/program out there that can
AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Checking if a CMS disk has changed
On Tuesday, 03/09/2010 at 09:57 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
So, I?m looking for a (super)quick resident CMS module that given a
virtual
disk address can tell if that CMS disk needs to be re
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] De la part
de Horlick, Michael
Envoyé : lundi 1 mars 2010 20:52
À : IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Objet : Re: Trapping output right after LOGON
What do you mean by « Changing LINK to COMMAND LINK may help, that's for sure.
I have MDISK statements for my VSE minidisks
it.
I plan to use it to capture z/Linux NIC errors when a GRANT has been missed,
for starters.
Regards, Doug
From: Horlick, Michael michael.horl...@cgi.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Tue, March 2, 2010 9:50:31 AM
Subject: Re: Trapping output right
of problem?
Mike Horlick
Conseiller
CGI Gestion Intégrée des Technologies
1350 Boul. René-Lévesque Ouest
Montréal, Qc, H3G 1T4
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: March 2, 2010 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: Trapping output right after LOGON
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Horlick, Michael michael.horl...@cgi.com
wrote:
Well , I told me my automation guy to use VMOPER to trap messages starting with
'HCP' and ending with an 'E' and I got an unexpected side effect.
After
Greetings,
I would like to trap all the CP console output from a virtual machine from its
initial XAUTOLOG/LOGON. I have several z/VSE machines which are XAUTOLOGed on
by the operator. Reason? In rare instances, maybe a pack is not attached to
the system which contains some minidisks used
suggestion.
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
Horlick, Michael michael.horl...@cgi.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
03/01/2010 12:41 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM
START
Only CP commands may be entered into the CP Directory for users. You may
specify any CP command argument. More details in the manual.
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
Horlick, Michael michael.horl...@cgi.com
Sent by: The IBM
= RC
EXIT RC
==
Regards, Doug
- Original Message -
From: Horlick, Michael mailto:michael.horl...@cgi.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
and datesubtract CSL
functions (usable from Rexx as well). You should be able to
do what you want with the functions they provide. They're
documented in the CMS Application Multitasking document.
HTH
DJ
- Original Message -
From: Horlick, Michael michael.horl...@cgi.com
To: IBMVM
, display args and Return w/o args *
* *
/
Horlick, Michael michael.horl...@cgi.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
09/24/2009 10:10 AM
Hi,
Occasionally we have had a request to add an authorised operator for
RSCS. We usually change the RSCS CONFIG and wait till the next VM IPL
(the only time we re-cycle RSCS). Is there a way to dynamically add an
authorised operator for RSCS?
Thanks,
Mike Horlick
CGI Montreal
cooperation.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:36 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Dynamically adding an authorised operator for RSCS
Hi,
Occasionally we
Subject: Re: Dynamically adding an authorised operator for RSCS
On 4/3/09 10:35 AM, Horlick, Michael michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
We are at z/VM 5.2. We have a pretty busy RSCS system during the day.
I was
hoping without a bounce.
Create a DVM running PROP, and authorize the DVM in the RSCS
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: January 29, 2009 3:44 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Need ideas for checking current terminal response time
On Thursday, 01/29/2009 at 02:26 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
I hardcap DEV and QUALITY
System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: January 28, 2009 2:39 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Need ideas for checking current terminal response time
On Wednesday, 01/28/2009 at 02:09 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
I agree that when
Greetings,
Here is the situation.
We are running z/VM 5.2 and 5 z/VSE 4.1.0 guest systems (3 production, 2
development machines) on an IBM 2066 (z800). In 2 of these VSEs there is
a heavy duty CICS/TS system running.
We use SET SHARE ABS to give them a minimum target of CPU, no limits,
TCPIP in z/VM has metrics that can be used to show network response
time. z/VM provides transaction data. As a performance monitor that
analyzes both, ESAMON will cost you less than 1% of a cpu. Could
probably do what you want with just zMON at $1200/month.
Horlick, Michael wrote:
Greetings
]on Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:27 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Need ideas for checking current terminal response time
Greetings,
Here is the situation.
We are running z/VM 5.2
ideas for checking current terminal response time
ESAMON will let you know that minute. It analyzes the data every
minute, alerts are set to check values every minute. So if that is after
the fact, then yes
Horlick, Michael wrote:
Hi,
Right now most users are still connected as SNA
terminal response time
Hi Mike,
Do you give the VM VTAM userid any sort of preference? We've given
VTAM a SHARE ABS 3%.
Ron
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
Greetings,
Here is the situation.
We are running z/VM 5.2 and 5 z/VSE 4.1.0 guest
: January 28, 2009 12:03 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Need ideas for checking current terminal response time
On Wednesday, 01/28/2009 at 11:27 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
I?m toying with creating a REXX EXEC which uses RXLDEV to create a
logical 3270
at 02:31 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
The client is supposed to be getting a new version of their software
and
I have been looking at all the DLOGMOD's that I can use for a
dialled
terminal. So far, nothing in the IBM ISTINCLM modetab works for them
(it
works fine for my
: December 12, 2008 12:42 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
On Friday, 12/12/2008 at 10:13 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
Actually , it has nothing to do with TPX.
For one virtual terminal (4D0) I changed the Logappl to VM:
Try
, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
For my emulator (myExtra!) it works fine but fails for their emulator.
However,
under SNA it works.
And so I state again for the record: You must gather diagnostic data
from
CA-TPX to see the difference in the data streams flowing to/from TCP/IP
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
Hello Alan et all,
Just a little update. I created a 24 record file with 1234567890
repeated for 80 characters and asked the client to test
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 03:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
Hello Alan et all,
Just a little update. I created a 24 record file with 1234567890
repeated for 80 characters and asked
Hello Alan et all,
Just a little update. I created a 24 record file with 1234567890
repeated for 80 characters and asked the client to test.
This time he says the file transfer doesn't issue messages but also
doesn't upload the file to the host. It completes but the CMS file is
not
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: December 4, 2008 3:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
On Thursday, 12/04/2008 at 02:40 EST, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The client has asked me about TN3270E and claims
are mine alone and do not necessarily
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.
Horlick, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
12/04/2008 01:40 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Greetings,
My client is moving away from SNA to TCP/IP. We use CA-TPX as our
session manager and the client uses a terminal emulator called
'Proclient OnWeb Web to Host'.
They use IND$FILE and are getting error - TRANS13 when uploading a file
from their PC to their CMS A-disk. It doesn't
are currently using and see if that could be the problem.
Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
and test it.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms731913.aspx
It appears that specifying a buffered transfer works but a write
structured field does not.
Mike
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Foundation
330-588-4723
ext 40441
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:39 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: IND$FILE fails through CA-TPX and TCP/IP for VM
aliases have not been initialized yet by the
host
operating system.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 3:15 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: CP Entered; Disabled Wait PSW
messages anymore, we were getting abends soon after IPL) and
they were able to put us on an older machine which made the abends go
away. We had to put a service pack on our VM before the next test!
Ron
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello David,
Thanks
is a list of the zSeries processors:
# Model
2064 z900
2066 z800
2084 z990
2086 z890
2094 z9-EC (enterprise class)
2096 z9-BC (business class)
2097 z10-EC
2098 z10-BC
So a 2084 is a z990 and not a z900.
Doug Breneman z/VM Development IBM Endicott, NY
Inactive hide details for Horlick, Michael
Hi,
I'm at DRP site and we restored our system packs. However at VM IPL we get:
HCPGIR450W CP entered; disabled wait PSW 00020 9025
Any idea why?
Thanks,
Mike
Greetings,
We are starting to migrate a lot of our users from SNA to TCP/IP.
I have the SCEXIT EXEC set up to do a DIAL into VTAM in order to access
our CA-TPX session manager.
I am having problems with getting the terminal definitions passed
through. For example, if I create a 3278
, 2008 12:21 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TCP/IP and VTAM definition
On Thursday, 10/30/2008 at 12:06 EDT, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having problems with getting the terminal definitions passed
through. For
example, if I create a 3278 Model 5 terminal with my
On Thursday, 10/30/2008 at 12:31 EDT, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, they get a Model 5 if not dialled. It looks like you're right
about the logmode. I'm a little rusty on VTAM. Need to investigate
what
to use.
Use D4B3290. A snippet from my non-SNA USSTAB:
UNDIAL USSCMD
Greetings,
We have an interesting problem. We are using CA-VMLIB and have been
getting an error on the VMLIB service machine comme ca:
VMLSRV001I - CA-VMLIB 3.2 9604 DATE 05/02/96 COPYRIGHT (C) 1996 COMPUTER
ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
VMLIB READY FOR
Acceleration
A cat will accelerate at a constant rate, until he gets good and
ready to stop.
Horlick, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/23/2008 2:08 PM
Hi Tom,
This is what we have for our busiest VSE system:
PRTYXCM MIKE
AR 0015 PRTY G=T
Cross-posted to both VMESA-L and VSE-L mailing lists
Greetings,
We have just converted the last of our 5 VSE machines to z/VSE 4.1.0
(from VSE/ESA 2.6.1) and are experiencing performance issues. My peak
times are 98-100% utilization and people are complaining about poor
response times.
the SRM
STORBUFF setting to allow more overcommittment of real storage.
Monitor
your paging activity and page space usage carefully.
Mike
C. M. (Mike) Hammock
Sr. Technical Support
zFrame IBM zSeries Solutions
(404) 643-3258
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Horlick,
Michael
?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 12:55 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Using SET SHARE, performance problem
The VSE guests are usually 'Q0 PS', sometimes 'Q0 RUN
. Technical Support
zFrame IBM zSeries Solutions
(404) 643-3258
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Horlick,
Michael
michael.horlick@
To
cgi.com IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent by: The IBM IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Unfortunately the guy with the EXPLORE/VM stats is off today.
I have added them all up and the total VSEs add up to 90%. That's the
minimum. There not capped.
I have CICS/TS highest priority in all my VSEs. All the batch partitions
are lowest in priority.
We are going to have do some
.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
Law of Cat Acceleration
A cat will accelerate at a constant rate, until he gets good and
ready to stop.
Horlick, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/23/2008 1:29 PM
Unfortunately the guy with the EXPLORE/VM stats is off today.
I have added them all up and the total
I backed out the change to CICS data tables. I also reviewed the manual
you have pointed me too. I should have read it while doing the
conversion.
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: April 23, 2008
Greetings,
FYI, I opened a PMR regarding the issue of directory entry shuffling
that was happening to me. Some responses from IBM:
quote
Well this behavior is built into DirMaint. DirMaint has to sort entries
is some order mostly based upon CP rules. DirMaint tries to associate
LINK and
Ok, will do.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: February 15, 2008 10:29 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: How comments treated by DIRMAINT
On Friday, 02/15/2008 at 10:10 EST, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL
Greetings,
Hopefully you can see the attachments. I created a user, got its
directory entry from DIRMAINT, saw that it was shuffled a bit, put in
back in the way I wanted (see ESAMGH BEFORE) and did a DIRM REPLACE
followed by DIRM GET NOLOCK. Did a RECEIVE as ESAMGH AFTER. These are
the actual
Hi,
Is there a command that can tell what these parameters are set to or do I need
to check all the mdisks that DIRMAINT has access to.
I started this thread and what we want is simple. For our VSE machines what we
want is WYSIWYG. When I want to do a 'DIRM REPLACE', DIRMAINT should
by DIRM REP. All comments stay where I put them.
Jim
Horlick, Michael wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--_=_NextPart_001_01C86CCF.63555168
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
=20
Is there a command
have
SORT_BY_DEVICE_ADDRESS=YES? If so, you probably want to change it to
no. I think the comments are moving when the directory entry is
sorted. There are some other sorting options that can be specified -
you may want to look at those.
On Feb 7, 2008 11:30 AM, Horlick, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello Kris,
I don't have RACF. What is the logic behind the shuffling that is done
by DIRMAINT regarding comment and MDISK statements?
Also, is there a command to DIRMAINT that tells you what its' settings
are (for example, what the SORT_BY_DEVICE_ADDRESS is set at)?
Thanks,
Mike
statements cannot be inserted
at the old places with some extra REXX logic in DIRMAINT, but it
wouldn't be easy to make it bulletproof.
--
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support
2008/2/8, Horlick, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Kris,
I don't have RACF. What is the logic behind the shuffling
Greetings,
We have a situation that has been annoying us for quite awhile now with regards
to DIRMAINT. When we add MDISKs for a user (especially for a VSE user) we
usually add comment statements just before the new MDISK. No problem, except
when we later GET the directory entry the
#2 is easier to code as you only have one substitution variable
instead of two for the GET.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VMOperating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Horlick,Michael
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 10:27 AM
To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Greetings,
I am trying to create an associative array of some sort that will be
preserved across EXEC invocations. I thought the best way of doing this
is using the GLOBALV command.
I have a list of printers and their IP addresses. For example, printers
A, B, C with IP addresses
Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 10:24 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: GLOBALV question
I am a little confused in the difference between a SETS , for
example and a PUTS.
My question is really about speed of retrieval. Is it faster
searching one group
Hello,
I am trying to use the ftp command on the mainframe to put a CMS file on
a Unix box. I am able to login to this machine, cd to the proper
subdirectory but I get '530 User access denied' when I do the put
command.
I can do the operation from the Command Prompt on my PC.
Why
Thank you all for your replies. It looks like I will have to speak to
the admin of that box. I am not 100% sure what type of box it is but
from the message 220 whmm0232 Microsoft FTP Service (Version 5.0) can
I assume that it is some sort of PC and not what I thought as a Unix
machine?
Mike
Thanks
Mike
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hughes, Jim
Sent: October 29, 2007 11:20 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: User access denied
Looks like a windoze box on the other end. You need to see
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
