day, July 07, 2011 10:19 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: SFS Catalog Storage Pool
>
> On Thursday, 07/07/2011 at 12:35 EDT, "Schuh, Richard"
>
> wrote:
> > Something ought to be done about the instructions regarding
> MAXUSERS.
> > A
&
user that tried to
use
> SFS) with MU of 100, 200, or 300. Upping it to 1000 fixed the problem.
>
> And no, Alan or Mike, I will not open an incident or call the Support
Center
> (Unless I call to say goodbye) :-)
Anyone can send e-mail to mhvr...@us.ibm.com and comment on
Something ought to be done about the instructions regarding MAXUSERS. A few
years ago, I had a small system that only had 64 users in the directory. It had
performance problems (a complete freeze of any user that tried to use SFS) with
MU of 100, 200, or 300. Upping it to 1000 fixed the problem
Thanks kris...
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 11:51:57 +0200
From: kris.buel...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: SFS Catalog Storage Pool
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
The physical space for the catalog is large enough, but SFS also has a notion
of "logical space". SFS is derived from SQL/DS, remember
The physical space for the catalog is large enough, but SFS also has a
notion of "logical space". SFS is derived from SQL/DS, remember DBEXTENTs
and DBSPACEs).
You need to run FILESERV *RE*GENERATE and increase MAXUSERS and/or MAXDISKS,
chapter 11 in the SFS admin manual.
2011/7/
I have a large SFS and monitoring my Catalog Space Information, I observed that
my Percent used index blocks was at 97% I performed a control bata backup and
done a FILESERV REORG. This in turn gave me 94% percent used index blocks. My
Catalog storage pool 1 has the following specifications
elp (the code storing the files was changed at
time x; the code reading the files still found its stuff but via ALIASes,
and I had some extra day to fix the read code).
2011/4/28 clifford jackson
> Hello All, I have a SFS data base with a Hierarchical directory structure
> of File Control
Hello All, I have a SFS data base with a Hierarchical directory structure of
File Control my tree structure currently has one top level directory, this
directory is used for report repository. This directory has grown very large, I
have an application that access this directory by customers
] *On
> Behalf Of *John Hall
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:04 AM
>
> *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: SFS problem
>
> If I recall correctly, DIAG D4 is the one that manipulates the secondary
> ID, aka "Alternate ID". (SECUSER is an old term)
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Hall
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:04 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
If I recall correctly, DIAG D4 is the one that manipulates the secondary ID,
aka "Alterna
VMBATCH workers get initialized, end, and
especially: how the post-job "cleanup" process works. It might be as
simple as changing the program to release the SFS directory before ending
(and perhaps examining the connection and looping until it has been
cleared).
BTW, the other common VMBAT
Interesting problem Nora.
Nothing recorded in the SFS log either.
Please post your POOLDEF statements and your DMSPARMS for the filepool
having the problems.
Also, what is the virtual storage size defined for the sfs server?
Regards,
Jim Hughes
Consulting
I do not believe that this is the problem. I was giving you information
on the failing job that I am most familiar with. Other jobs that fail
are submitted to VMBatch by the ID that also owns the SFS directories.
FYI, "VMBatch" is the IBM VM Batch Facility Version 2.2, I was not
a
is is that DIAG D4 does not change the
userid associated with any existing (already active) SFS connections. This
is because it is a CP function and manipulates the VMDBK. Once set, future
connections (via APPC/VM Connect) will utilize the Alternate ID. ... This is
why severing all connection
* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] *On
> Behalf Of *Kris Buelens
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 14, 2011 4:58 PM
>
> *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: SFS problem
>
> Note: if you use VMBATCH, the worker machine connects to SFS with the
> auth
Isn't that DIAG 88, instead of SECUSER?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Hall
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 6:41 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
Nora,
Batch jobs normally run with the privileges of the "owner" of the job, using
the SECUSER facility in z/VM. With SFS, this can lead to unexpected results
when a prior batch job leaves the worker with a connection to the filepool
under a different user's id. If the job orderi
Jim,
There are basically no messages at all in the console for the SFS
service machine. One of the failures was on April 13. This is the
console for that day--no editing at all of the contents.
HCPMID6001I TIME IS 00:00:00 EDT WEDNESDAY 04/13/11
Mgmt chose the latter.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Graves Nora E
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 7:43 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
Mike,
Yes, I checked out the message. The thing is, th
Jim,
I didn't think to look there, I will.
Our regular backups are VMBACKUP, which is scheduled to run 90 minutes
after this job runs. This job runs only 2 minutes maximum, so I know
that isn't the problem. But the SFS console may have some good
indications. I'll see what I
Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 4:58 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
Note: if you use VMBATCH, the worker machine connects to SFS with the
authority of the job submitter.
You say "This user i
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
On Thursday, 04/14/2011 at 03:47 EDT, Graves Nora E
wrote:
> DMSOPN1258E You are not authorized to write to file XX 20110413
Z1
:
> I've issued QUERY ACCESSED. The directory shows that is accessed
R/W.
>
> When the
il 14, 2011 4:13 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
Nora,
Did you issue: HELP DMSOPN1258E
The response from the msg indicates an SFS authorization problem.:
--
(c) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2008
DMS1258E to
write
(to)
file
Explanation
Nora,
Have you looked at the SFS service machine's console log for any odd
messages?
Could the SFS server being doing some sort of control backup?
Jim Hughes
Consulting Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Group
Department of Information Technology
State o
Note: if you use VMBATCH, the worker machine connects to SFS with the
authority of the job submitter.
You say "This user is the owner of most of the directories" You mean: the
submitter is userid ABC, the dirids are all named "fpoolid:ABC.something"?
2011/4/14 Graves Nora E
On Thursday, 04/14/2011 at 03:47 EDT, Graves Nora E
wrote:
> DMSOPN1258E You are not authorized to write to file XX 20110413 Z1
:
> I've issued QUERY ACCESSED. The directory shows that is accessed R/W.
>
> When the write is unsuccessful, the program then loops through 5 tries
of
>
Nora,
Did you issue: HELP DMSOPN1258E
The response from the msg indicates an SFS authorization problem.:
--
(c) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2008
DMS1258E to write
(to)
file
Explanation: You attempted to write to a file for which you do not have
write
:46
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: SFS problem
We are having an intermittent problem with SFS and I'm hoping someone
may have some ideas of what to pursue next.
We have several batch jobs that run under VMBATCH overnight. Sometimes
they are not able to create a file in a directory,
We are having an intermittent problem with SFS and I'm hoping someone
may have some ideas of what to pursue next.
We have several batch jobs that run under VMBATCH overnight. Sometimes
they are not able to create a file in a directory, even though most
times it is successful. The
, March 31, 2011 3:16 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS management question
I some release it became less "required" to run SFS reorganisations. You can
run a FILEPOOL REORG, that will only reorganise storage pool 1, that is, the
SFS DB2-like catalog. There is
I some release it became less "required" to run SFS reorganisations. You
can run a FILEPOOL REORG, that will only reorganise storage pool 1, that is,
the SFS DB2-like catalog. There is no tool to reorganise the other storage
groups (apart from a backup & restore).
2011/3/3
It's been a long time since I managed a production SFS system so I need
a little refresher.
On our development system, I ran out of space on my SFS pool, but was
able to reduce the usage down to just 45% by deleting a bunch of stuff
we no longer needed. Now the SFS seems 'slow'. D
On Wednesday, 03/30/2011 at 06:00 EDT, clifford jackson
wrote:
> If I allocate x amount of storage to a SFS file pool and the tree
structure is
> such that I have x subdirectories under my top directory, will my
> subdirectories have access to all allocated storage within that
If I allocate x amount of storage to a SFS file pool and the tree structure is
such that I have x subdirectories under my top directory, will my
subdirectories have access to all allocated storage within that specific
storage pool, say for instance storage pool 3.
Also will my subdirectories
tting all work
>> that is pending in that workunit.
>>
>> Some other thing when using SFS: if you'd use the sequence COPY into
>> tempfile, followed by a RENAME to install a new version of "MY FILE" note
>> then that the auhtories granted to the origna
ere is no *need* to use other than the deafult
workunit with DMSFILEC or DMSRENAM if you can afford committing all work
that is pending in that workunit.
Some other thing when using SFS: if you'd use the sequence COPY into
tempfile, followed by a RENAME to install a new version of "MY
t
workunit with DMSFILEC or DMSRENAM if you can afford committing all work
that is pending in that workunit.
Some other thing when using SFS: if you'd use the sequence COPY into
tempfile, followed by a RENAME to install a new version of "MY FILE" note
then that the auhtories granted t
On Tuesday, 03/22/2011 at 12:18 EDT, Les Koehler
wrote:
> So with FILE CONTROL you can't replace co-dependent files in one atomic
> operation, as one would do with the 'copyfile two-step' (love that
phrase!)?
Yes, you can (and in DIRECTORY CONTROL directories, too), but you need to
become fami
trick to update a few files in one atomic operation: you had it
almost right, except that COPYFILE has no NOUPDIRT option, but that isn't
needed. The use of temp files and the RENAMEs with NOUPDIRT that care of
that.
With SFS however, RENAME does not honor the NOUPDIRT option.
I never trie
that isn't
needed. The use of temp files and the RENAMEs with NOUPDIRT that care of
that.
With SFS however, RENAME does not honor the NOUPDIRT option.
I never tried but you can use the CSL routine DMSFILEC, it has a NOCOMMIT
option. At the end of the DMSFILEC calls, you then call DMSCO
version k (noupdir
rename old2 version k save2 version k (noupdir
rename pseudo1 name k old1 version k (noupdir
rename pseudo2 name k old2 version k
(hope I got that right!) to avoid impacting other users?
You never get ERROR 3 READING FILE with SFS and you don't use the
"copyfile twos
version k
>
> (hope I got that right!) to avoid impacting other users?
You never get ERROR 3 READING FILE with SFS and you don't use the
"copyfile twostep" with SFS. You just change the files. If someone
accesses the directory while you're updating, then they will see
03/21/2011 at 05:50 EDT, clifford jackson
wrote:
What are the major differences between filecontrol and directorycontrol
in a
SFS structure
DIRECTORY CONTROL directories have two important attributes:
1. You don't seen any changes to any files until you re-ACCESS the
directory.
2. Au
On Monday, 03/21/2011 at 05:50 EDT, clifford jackson
wrote:
> What are the major differences between filecontrol and directorycontrol
in a
> SFS structure
DIRECTORY CONTROL directories have two important attributes:
1. You don't seen any changes to any files until you re
did I miss something.
> Steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
> Behalf Of David Boyes
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 2:51 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Temp SFS environment
>
>&
> Wasn't the original poster trying to do this with virtual disk(s)? And
> if that's the case it has a high potential of being in memory anyway?
> Or did I miss something.
> Steve
In this case, it probably doesn't matter at all, but that's the reason the XC
mode setting is in the VMSERVx directo
With Dataspaces, the SFS end-user can directly read the CMS file data,
without APPC communication to the SFS server. Only at ACCESS time, the
end-user of a "dataspaced" DIRC must talk to the SFS server.
2011/3/17 Gentry, Stephen
> Wasn't the original poster trying to do this
avid Boyes
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 2:51 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Temp SFS environment
> All that brings a subsidiary question : is it important to preserve
the machine xc
> in the VMSERVx directories (I should read the doc I think...) ?
You need the XC mode setting if
> All that brings a subsidiary question : is it important to preserve the
> machine xc
> in the VMSERVx directories (I should read the doc I think...) ?
You need the XC mode setting if you want SFS to use VM dataspaces to map parts
of the data into memory (which would be consistent
my previous tests. I decided to
> freely supersede¹ Alan¹s directives to go back with my v-disk and check again
> the directory...
> and I got a idea. I had copied a VMSERVx directory to create my own SFS user.
> VMSERVx come with a MACHINE XC definition. I removed that line. And it w
V-disks stay around until the last user releases them, so could you have
them linked read-only by a second user as well to keep them alive until
you¹re done with them?
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OC-1-18 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Roc
I don't know about detach, but re-link definitely happens. File pool
minidisks can be defined in the directory with linkmode R and they still
become linked R/W when the server starts and remain R/W after the server
terminates.
Ivica Brodaric
BNZ
Thank you for sharing your reasoning. Makes sense to me.
Thank you,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Alain Benveniste
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:47 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Temp SFS
used to migrate 3380 to
3390.
Alain
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 16 mars 2011 à 23:12, "Wandschneider, Scott"
a écrit :
> My curious mind wants me to ask. . . Why would you want a temporary SFS
> Directory in memory?
>
> Thank you,
> Scott
>
>
> -Original
I am not sure about this, but I think it might be that the mdisks
get detached and re-linked, which would kill your SFS server
if they were TDISK.
See what response you get to:
#cp q v 301-305
immediately after the failure.
The reason I think I remember this is that years ago I once
tried to
On Wednesday, 03/16/2011 at 06:01 EDT, Alain Benveniste
wrote:
> DMS5FE3040E File pool server system error occurred - DMS4FK 02
That error code indicates a failure of the MAPMDISK IDENTIFY function (see
CP Programming Services), and the likely candidate error is "V-DISK not
supported".
I thi
My curious mind wants me to ask. . . Why would you want a temporary SFS
Directory in memory?
Thank you,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Alain Benveniste
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 5:01 PM
To: IBMVM
Hi,
I tried to create a Temp SFS environment in using FB-512 VDSK.
Part of my directory looks like this:
MDISK 0191 3390 11 1 VM0HVF MR
MDISK 0301 FB-512 V-DISK 64000
MDISK 0302 FB-512 V-DISK 64000
MDISK 0303 FB-512 V-DISK 64000
MDISK 0304 FB-512 V-DISK 64000
MDISK 0305 FB-512 V-DISK 64000
The
You CAN put TSAF in between SFS and AVS+VTAM, but it's not necessary.
Mark Wheeler
UnitedHealth Group
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:13:28 -0400
From: rhamil...@cas.org
Subject: Re: Old codger question: Can SFS be networked across systems?
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Yep; I used
export the content to his machines. (There are various
ways people have tried to close the gap in NFS, wth varying results
and varied satisfaction, all very confusing.) Similarly, if you don't
trust the sysadmin of the other VM system(s), don't play SFS with
them.
Rob mentions username
Wheeler
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 12:57 PM
To: IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu
Subject: Re: Old codger question: Can SFS be networked across systems?
In the unlikely situation where you run VTAM on your z/VM systems, you
can config your AVS gateways and connect the two SFS's via LU6.2.
Mark Wh
In the unlikely situation where you run VTAM on your z/VM systems, you can
config your AVS gateways and connect the two SFS's via LU6.2.
Mark Wheeler
UnitedHealth Group
> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:38:33 +0100
> From: rvdh...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Old codger question: Can SF
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Les Koehler wrote:
> A friend and I were (dis)cussing SFS and he thinks it can be networked
> cross-country. Possible? I would guess that it would be an authentication
> nightmare at the user level. Thoughts?
If you share via ISFC that means both sides m
A friend and I were (dis)cussing SFS and he thinks it can be networked
cross-country. Possible? I would guess that it would be an authentication
nightmare at the user level. Thoughts?
Les
Ivica and others. Thank you for the help. Increasing the size of the
control disk fixed the problem.
Steve
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Ivica Brodaric
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 8:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS
Stephen,
Do I understand the formula and definitions correctly?
>
> You do, but that's just to get you started. It really all depends on how
many objects are going to be created in that file pool. So, take that
formula as an attempt to predict the future.
MAXUSERS determines the logical size of t
> Do I understand the formula and definitions correctly?
>
> Steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Sue Farrell
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 8:56 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Sub
March 11, 2011 8:56 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS question
Steve,
You need to increase your MAXUSERS setting by doing a FILESERV
REGENERATE
for the file pool.
Although it's buried, the 51010 reason code is mentioned in Chapter 5 of
the CMS File Pool Planning,
Steve,
You need to increase your MAXUSERS setting by doing a FILESERV REGENERATE
for the file pool.
Although it's buried, the 51010 reason code is mentioned in Chapter 5 of
the CMS File Pool Planning, Administration, and Operation manual:
What Happens When the Limit is Reached: Logical cat
How large is the catalog?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 3:40 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS question
Hi, Steve.
Yes, you need to expand your storage group 1
Do QUERY FILEPOOL CATALOG to see the amount of catalog data blocks and
catalog index blocks used. Total number of catalog space blocks (data+index)
is MAXUSERS*85. Maybe your MAXUSERS value is too small?
Ivica Brodaric
BNZ
the mod3's and thus I
get this message. Due to the nature of SFS, I assume it would spread
the load across the 16 drives.
Steve
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 4:43 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV
Yes.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Gentry, Stephen
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:33 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: SFS question
I'm getting the following error
Thta's what I'd conclude too.
Try Q FILEPOOL STORGRP (or use SFSULIST, it shows the summary too)
2011/3/10 Gentry, Stephen
> I’m getting the following error on a DMSCLOSE:
>
> 51010 - No space for data left in catalog space.
>
> I am writing a group of files, 73
733 of them, to an SFS pool
>
> Does the error message mean that I don’t have enough room in storage
> group 1?
>
> TIA
>
> Steve
>
--
Dave Jones
V/Soft Software
www.vsoft-software.com
Houston, TX
281.578.7544
I'm getting the following error on a DMSCLOSE:
51010 - No space for data left in catalog space.
I am writing a group of files, 733 of them, to an SFS pool
Does the error message mean that I don't have enough room in storage
group 1?
TIA
Steve
TSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Les Koehler
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 2:07 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: CMS SFS Question
>
> That's NOT the scenario you gave in your original note! You
> wrote about deleting Richard when you wrote:
>
> It is pos
is not enrolled
Richard grants Les some SFS authorities.
DELETE USER LES is issued without enrolling LES (or no DELETE USER is issued
for LES)
The authorities granted to LES by RICHARD are left hanging and will be applied to any newly created LES regardless of the identity of the owner.
If LES
It is permissions granted to users who are not enrolled that is the issue. Here
is the scenario:
User Richard is enrolled
User Les is not enrolled
Richard grants Les some SFS authorities.
DELETE USER LES is issued without enrolling LES (or no DELETE USER is issued
for LES)
The authorities
I guess there's something implied there that I don't get. Scenario, from your
note:
Your task is to delete LES, who is enrolled, from the SFS system
LES has granted rights to RICHARD but RICHARD is not enrolled
How does enrolling LES for 0 blocks do anything about the granted r
I simply enroll any user to be deleted for 0 blocks. The alternative is to scan
the sfs directories and files looking for such users. It is much easier to
attempt the enroll. If it fails, it is because the user is already enrolled.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
> -Original Mess
I'm curious: How do you find the user who is not enrolled, but granted rights to
the target user to be deleted?
Les
Schuh, Richard wrote:
The Pipe is the easiest.
PIPE < user list | spec /delete user/ 1 w1 nw | cms | > delete log a
Note, however, that if you have an SFS that h
The Pipe is the easiest.
PIPE < user list | spec /delete user/ 1 w1 nw | cms | > delete log a
Note, however, that if you have an SFS that has a lot of files and permissions,
each DELETE USER can take a long time, so you do not want to do this on an id
that you might need soon after you
ocity Software
http://www.velocitysoftware.com/
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Rich Smrcina wrote:
> REXX?
>
> On 03/01/2011 12:35 PM, Wandschneider, Scott wrote:
> > Is there a way to delete multiple users at once or create a "batch" job to
> > delete multiple users that ar
REXX?
On 03/01/2011 12:35 PM, Wandschneider, Scott wrote:
Is there a way to delete multiple users at once or create a "batch" job to
delete multiple users that are enrolled in SFS?
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Systems Programmer 3|| Infocrossing, a Wipro Company || 11707 Mir
Is there a way to delete multiple users at once or create a "batch" job to
delete multiple users that are enrolled in SFS?
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Systems Programmer 3|| Infocrossing, a Wipro Company || 11707 Miracle Hills
Drive, Omaha, NE, 68154-4457|| : 40
Not really true Dave: the SFSULIST panel is complete when not being SFS
admin. Only the Catalog stats are not available to non-admins (upper right
corner).
But, yes, using PF11 to start DIRLIST of the user pointed too will only list
the subdirs one is authorized to.
2011/1/4 Dave Jones
> St
SULIST already downloaded just didn't know
> that's what it would/could do.
> Steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
> Behalf Of Dave Jones
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 9:20 AM
> To: IB
January 04, 2011 9:20 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: SFS question
>
> Steve, grab Kris Buelen's SFSULIST tool from the VM download page; it
> does exactly what you are looking for.
>
> Have a good one.
>
> On 01/04/2011 08:13 AM, Gentry, Stephen wrote:
&
Dave Jones
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 9:20 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS question
Steve, grab Kris Buelen's SFSULIST tool from the VM download page; it
does exactly what you are looking for.
Have a good one.
On 01/04/2011 08:13 AM, Gentry, Stephen wrote:
> How can I t
Steve, grab Kris Buelen's SFSULIST tool from the VM download page; it
does exactly what you are looking for.
Have a good one.
On 01/04/2011 08:13 AM, Gentry, Stephen wrote:
> How can I tell what users and/or what files are in a storage group? I'd
> prefer to know users but can trace it back if I
How can I tell what users and/or what files are in a storage group? I'd
prefer to know users but can trace it back if I know what files.
Thanks,
Steve
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:44:04 +0100, Berry van Sleeuwen wrote:
>Would PIPSTOP cancel the SFS command (or any CP/CMS command for that
>matter)? If so then you could use PIPSTOP to end the pipeline. Just a
>theory, not tested in any way...
As John Hartmann explained:
>> From:
ssage until the
RC = 55, 18 hours after the
hang started. At that point the problem is gone.
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:20:52 -0500, Alan Altmark wrote:
>John was right, you can't set a timeout for sfs commands. Having anothe
r
>ID hx your ID after a too-long wait is about it. That said
If anyone is interested, I have a TIMEBOMB module that lets a CMS user
set the CP command(s) to be executed and the amount of time to wait
before the timebomb 'explodes'.
Drop me a note off list if anyone would like a copy.
Merry Christmas to all
DJ
On 12/24/2010 07:44 AM, Ronald van der La
Would PIPSTOP cancel the SFS command (or any CP/CMS command for that
matter)? If so then you could use PIPSTOP to end the pipeline. Just a
theory, not tested in any way...
'PIPE (end \) command LISTDIR ...', /* execute command */
'| stem',/* sto
On 12/24/2010 8:44 AM, Ronald van der Laan wrote:
Or use the CP timebomb to issue a timed CP command within your own userid.
Ronald van der Laan
What about doing an async dmsconn csl call, and then if you get no
response in several iterations of dmscheck, then close the workunit ???
John
Or use the CP timebomb to issue a timed CP command within your own userid.
Ronald van der Laan
John was right, you can't set a timeout for sfs commands. Having another
ID hx your ID after a too-long wait is about it. That said, you're better
off trying to find out why your workunit is hanging and solve the *real*
problem. Maybe the server is hung up on a backup.
Depending
John was right, you can't cause an sfs command to time out.
- Original Message -
From: Alan Ackerman [alan.acker...@bankofamerica.com]
Sent: 12/23/2010 06:09 PM CST
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Time out an SFS command
Moving this question from CMS-PIPELINES to
1 - 100 of 570 matches
Mail list logo
