Re: Question about Linux shutdown

2011-08-05 Thread Rich Smrcina
CP SIGNAL SHUTDOWN causes the standard Linux shutdown process to be executed, through the init scripts. If the software you mention contains quiesce or shutdown commands in the init scripts, it will be executed with SIGNAL SHUTDOWN. The big question then is of the time frame. Is 90 seconds

Re: Question about Linux shutdown

2011-08-05 Thread Lu GL Gao
Subject ARK.EDU Re: Question about Linux shutdown 2011-08-05 16:28

Re: Question about Linux shutdown

2011-08-05 Thread Rich Smrcina
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 2011-08-05 16:28 Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Question about Linux shutdown CP SIGNAL

Re: Question about Linux shutdown

2011-08-05 Thread Michael MacIsaac
you'll be waiting over 9 hours for a machine to just be logged off. *up to* more than 9 hours, right? If the machine shuts down in two minutes for example, won't it halt and signal back to z/VM that it's done? (whether it then gets logged off is another matter) I would normally set the

Re: Question about Linux shutdown

2011-08-05 Thread Rich Smrcina
is another matter) Yes, of course. But his question was related to if there's a problem during shutdown and a termination process hangs or something sinister like that. -- Rich Smrcina Velocity Software, Inc. http://www.velocitysoftware.com Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org WAVV 2012

Re: Question about Linux shutdown

2011-08-05 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com wrote: I would normally set the default to 600 seconds We just moved from 5 minutes (SET SIGNAL SHUTDOWN 300) to 10 minutes (SET SIGNAL SHUTDOWN 600) as some of our systems were not shutting down within 5 minutes. Systems

Re: Question about Linux shutdown

2011-08-05 Thread David Boyes
SIGNAL SHUTDOWN (if configured in the Linux guest) will run the equivalent of shutdown -h now, so as long as you provide the Linux guest time enough to execute a normal shutdown, it's safe to do that. 90 seconds may not be enough time - do a test shutdown manually to determine a rough idea of

Re: DASD utilization question

2011-08-05 Thread Ticona, Luis
Of Barton Robinson Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 10:11 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: DASD utilization question would you be looking for something from a really good performance monitor: Screen: ESAHST2 Velocity Software - VSIVM4 ESAMON 3.808 08/04 1 of 1 LINUX HOST

Re: DASD utilization question

2011-08-04 Thread Barton Robinson
would you be looking for something from a really good performance monitor: Screen: ESAHST2 Velocity Software - VSIVM4 ESAMON 3.808 08/04 1 of 1 LINUX HOST Storage Analysis Report NODE R* LIMIT 500 -Utilization- -Storage--

Question about Linux shutdown

2011-08-04 Thread Lu GL Gao
/Linux boots again? The reason why I ask this question is that I need to automatically backup linux system by Operation Manager for z/VM, before backing-up, linux should be shutdowned. I just wonder how to automatically stop softwares running on linux to be backup. Best Regards! Gao Lu (高路) I/T

Re: DASD utilization question

2011-08-03 Thread Scott Rohling
Linux and CMS use disks completely differently..Linux will use a minidisk as a partition either directly (such as /dev/dasda1 being mounted as a filesystem) -- or as part of an LVM volume group. It also may not use the minidisk at all.. On Linux -- a 'df -h' command should show you usage

Re: page pack question

2011-07-19 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
[mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Rich Smrcina Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:50 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: page pack question As long as they're not in use at the same time... no problem at all. On 07/12/2011 09:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote: I installed release

page pack question

2011-07-12 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
I installed release 6.1 of z/vm but I don't have enough mod 3's to label as page packs to match the 5.4 system. Is there any reason that I can't use the 5.4 page packs when I ipl 6.1 on level 1? On z/os, this is what I always do but on z/vm I usually define new page packs (ie 610pag,

Re: page pack question

2011-07-12 Thread Dave Jones
Hi, Anne. Yes, you can use the old 5.4 page packs when you IPL 6.1 on first level. Just make usre you add them to 6.1's SYSTEM CONFIG file as cpowned. DJ On 07/12/2011 09:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote: I installed release 6.1 of z/vm but I don’t have enough mod 3’s to label as page packs

Re: page pack question

2011-07-12 Thread Rich Smrcina
As long as they're not in use at the same time... no problem at all. On 07/12/2011 09:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote: I installed release 6.1 of z/vm but I don’t have enough mod 3’s to label as page packs to match the 5.4 system. Is there any reason that I can’t use the 5.4 page packs when I

Re: page pack question

2011-07-12 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 07/12/2011 at 10:38 EDT, Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote: I installed release 6.1 of z/vm but I don?t have enough mod 3?s to label as page packs to match the 5.4 system. Is there any reason that I can?t use the 5.4 page packs when I ipl 6.1 on level 1? On

Re: page pack question

2011-07-12 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
Blvd East Charleston, WV 25305 (304)558-5914 ext 58292 (304)558-1441 fax -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Rich Smrcina Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:50 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: page pack question

Re: page pack question

2011-07-12 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: page pack question As long as they're not in use at the same time... no problem at all. On 07/12/2011 09:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote: I installed release 6.1 of z/vm but I don't have enough mod 3's to label as page packs to match the 5.4 system

Re: page pack question

2011-07-12 Thread Bob Bates
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: page pack question How about I bring up 6.1 with the couple of 6.1 page packs I can define and then add the 5.4 ones on the fly? (attach them to system, define cpowned, etc) That way they would not be in the system config and I could still bring 6.1 up on second

Re: page pack question

2011-07-12 Thread Tom Huegel
, WV 25305 (304)558-5914 ext 58292 (304)558-1441 fax -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Rich Smrcina Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:50 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: page pack question As long

Re: page pack question

2011-07-12 Thread Rich Smrcina
Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Rich Smrcina Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:50 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: page pack question As long as they're not in use at the same time... no problem at all. On 07/12/2011 09:38

Re: page pack question

2011-07-12 Thread gclovis
question Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu You need to beable to access your 6.1 CF! disk from youe 1st level 5.4 machine to change the SYSTEM CONFIG file back to what you need for the 2nd level IPL... At least that is what I would do. On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:50 AM

Re: page pack question

2011-07-12 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
(304)558-1441 fax -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Rich Smrcina Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 11:07 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: page pack question That's reasonable. As long as the 5.4 system isn't using

Re: page pack question

2011-07-12 Thread Kris Buelens
Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Rich Smrcina Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 11:07 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: page pack question That's reasonable. As long as the 5.4 system isn't using them at the same time

EDEVICE Question

2011-06-30 Thread John Hanley
Hello, When setting up EDEVs, is it preferable to use a unique FCP subchannel per EDEV or to use a single FCP subchannel for multiple EDEVs? I multi path each EDEV across all my FCP CHPIDS and they are used in a single LPAR, so I'm not sure it matters? Thanks. John Hanley

Re: EDEVICE Question

2011-06-30 Thread Daniel Bewley
Hi John, I can't speak as to what's absolutely best, but I can tell you that in our environment we use a single set of multipathed FCP subchannels with access to multiple LUNs for our EDEVs. The EDEVs are then shared between 60 or so guests per LPAR without any issue. -Daniel Bewley On Thu,

Re: EDEVICE Question

2011-06-30 Thread John Hanley
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 06/30/2011 10:12 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: EDEVICE Question Hi John, I can't speak as to what's absolutely best, but I can tell you that in our environment we use a single set

Re: EDEVICE Question

2011-06-30 Thread Richard Troth
For scalability, no. In fact, since the I/O is per channel and not per subchannel, you gain little from spearding EDEVs across subchannels. At one point early in a prior life, I tried pinning each EDEV on its own pair of FCP subchans. Was a pain! -- R; Velocity Software

Re: Question on SHUTDOWNTIME

2011-06-24 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 06/23/2011 at 07:06 EDT, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote: The default is 30 seconds (Q SHUTDOWNTIME) for the CP's portion of the shutdown process. I recall hearing that is good default. We are seeing systems exceed that - 33 seconds in this one that seemed

Re: Question on SHUTDOWNTIME

2011-06-24 Thread Marcy Cortes
, June 24, 2011 12:23 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Question on SHUTDOWNTIME On Thursday, 06/23/2011 at 07:06 EDT, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote: The default is 30 seconds (Q SHUTDOWNTIME) for the CP's portion of the shutdown process. I recall hearing

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-23 Thread David Booher
=== From: David Booher david.boo...@quest.com To: IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu Date: 09/06/2011 12:25 Subject: Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu 09:40:56 XAUTOLOG CFCC4 09:40:56

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-23 Thread David Boyes
As a follow-up to this (for those interested), this turned out to be a hardware problem. The HMC's hard drive had crashed and communications was totally messed up. The CE promptly got things under control Suddenly I had a flash of the scene in Monty Python's Life of Brian after Brian

Question on SHUTDOWNTIME

2011-06-23 Thread Marcy Cortes
The default is 30 seconds (Q SHUTDOWNTIME) for the CP's portion of the shutdown process. I recall hearing that is good default. We are seeing systems exceed that - 33 seconds in this one that seemed to come with bonus messages (that is our SW seemed to capture the HCPWRP963I's on this one).

Re: Question on SHUTDOWNTIME

2011-06-23 Thread Scott Rohling
What's ME8PROX2? That seems to be taking a full 30 seconds to terminate.. Scott Rohling On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote: The default is 30 seconds (Q SHUTDOWNTIME) for the CP's portion of the shutdown process. I recall hearing that is good

Re: Question on SHUTDOWNTIME

2011-06-23 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 16:05 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: [IBMVM] Question on SHUTDOWNTIME The default is 30 seconds (Q SHUTDOWNTIME) for the CP's portion of the shutdown process. I recall hearing

Re: Question on SHUTDOWNTIME

2011-06-23 Thread Marcy Cortes
we need to change if everything is operating normally. Marcy From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Scott Rohling Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 4:20 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Question on SHUTDOWNTIME What's ME8PROX2

Re: Question on SHUTDOWNTIME

2011-06-23 Thread Marcy Cortes
, Dennis L Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 4:33 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Question on SHUTDOWNTIME I think I saw one of our systems take 78 seconds to shut down recently, but AFAIK, we don't have software to capture the shutdown messages. If I'm thinking of the right system

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-14 Thread gclovis
: David Booher david.boo...@quest.com To: IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu Date: 09/06/2011 12:25 Subject: Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu Yes, I see what you see on my zVM 4.4 system running on my z800 here in Chicago

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-14 Thread David Booher
: Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR David, I don't have access to a Z10, so it is only speculation. Something to check: * Are the CF Processors dedicated to CF LPAR? * The VM LPAR have access to at least one CF processor? * Is VM LPAR running in Mode VM? Follow

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-14 Thread gclovis
: 14/06/2011 10:44 Subject: Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Forgive my ignorance, but is this all defined in the IOCP? Because the IOCP is very generic and most of the stuff is SHARED. I don’t see anything

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-14 Thread David Booher
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR Hi, David. No, the processors and LPAR modes are defined into HMC (Hardware Management Console), function Configure Activation Profiles. It is not IOCP. Regards, __ Clovis From

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-14 Thread Mike Walter
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR Forgive my ignorance, but is this all defined in the IOCP? Because the IOCP is very generic and most of the stuff is SHARED. I don?t see anything in the current IOCP that sets any

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-14 Thread David Booher
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Walter Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 10:53 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR David, Isn't the problem that the virtual CF machines are not responding? If that is the case, then I don't understand why

Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-09 Thread David Booher
Am I understanding correctly that the CFUSER virtual machines that you can run when z/VM is running natively and now be run in zVM when running in an LPAR? This was added in zVM 5.4?

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-09 Thread Mike Walter
Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 06/09/2011 09:10 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR Am I understanding correctly that the CFUSER virtual machines that you

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-09 Thread David Booher
TO ERRORS. Dave Booher Quest Software From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Walter Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:31 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR We've been running CFUSER virtual

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-09 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 06/09/2011 at 10:12 EDT, David Booher david.boo...@quest.com wrote: Am I understanding correctly that the CFUSER virtual machines that you can run when z/VM is running natively and now be run in zVM when running in an LPAR? This was added in zVM 5.4? There has never been a

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-09 Thread David Booher
Yes, I see what you see on my zVM 4.4 system running on my z800 here in Chicago, but the z10 in the UK runs zVM in an LPAR and gives the strange messages indicated below. I saw Alan's response, but I'm unsure how to proceed. I know they are running CFs in LPARs on the z10, so I don't think

Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR

2011-06-09 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 06/09/2011 at 11:14 EDT, Mike Walter mike.wal...@aonhewitt.com wrote: I'm not sure if this will be of any help, but here are the CF-related console messages extracted from our most recent IPL of a z/VM 5.4 system running in an LPAR on a z10: You can find sample output and other

EXECIO DISKW Question

2011-06-01 Thread Sergio Lima
Hello List, We want write a REXX EXEC , that do a Update in place. Another words, I need, read the record 1 from the file, and then rewrite the same record. Is possible? Thanks, Sergio

Re: EXECIO DISKW Question

2011-06-01 Thread Chip Davis
Yes, but be careful. Try: EXECIO 1 DISKRU ... -Chip- On 6/1/11 14:49 Sergio Lima said: Hello List, We want write a REXX EXEC , that do a Update in place. Another words, I need, read the record 1 from the file, and then rewrite the same record. Is possible? Thanks, Sergio

Re: EXECIO DISKW Question

2011-06-01 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 06/01/2011 at 10:50 EDT, Sergio Lima sergiovm...@hotmail.com wrote: We want write a REXX EXEC , that do a Update in place. Another words, I need, read the record 1 from the file, and then rewrite the same record. Is possible? Yes. There are a few programming considerations:

Re: EXECIO DISKW Question

2011-06-01 Thread Mike Walter
System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 06/01/2011 10:28 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: EXECIO DISKW Question Yes, but be careful. Try: EXECIO 1 DISKRU ... -Chip- On 6/1/11 14:49 Sergio Lima said: Hello List

Re: EXECIO DISKW Question

2011-06-01 Thread David Boyes
We want write a REXX EXEC , that do a Update in place. Another words, I need, read the record 1 from the file, and then rewrite the same record. Is possible? In addition to reading the manuals that Alan suggested, you should look for the RXFILEIO package on the VMWorkshop tapes. It

Dirmaint question

2011-05-20 Thread Karl Kingston
Hi Folks. Yesterday, one of our administators issued a DIRM FOR ONGWW02 PURGE to delete a z/VM user. Checking to see if this was done, he issued DIRM FOR ONGWW02 REV and got the following back: DVHREQ3205E The directory entry for ONGWW02 is scheduled to be purged. I did a DIRM STATUS to see

Re: Dirmaint question

2011-05-20 Thread Hans Rempel
Karl. Is it possible that a user may still have an active link to the ONGWW02 minidisk? Hans From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Karl Kingston Sent: May-20-11 7:46 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Dirmaint question Hi Folks

Dirmaint question

2011-05-20 Thread Michael Wilkins
Greetings Karl, There was an APAR on DirMaint FL540 and FL610 (VM64724 - PURGE CLEAN ON USERID WITH VDISK DOES NOT COMPLETE). PTFs: Release 540 : UV61094 Release 610 : UV61095 When a user entry contains VDISK or TDISK minidisks, DirMaint would not finish PURGE processing correctly. When a

Re: Dirmaint question

2011-05-20 Thread gclovis
:47 Subject: Dirmaint question Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu Hi Folks. Yesterday, one of our administators issued a DIRM FOR ONGWW02 PURGE to delete a z/VM user. Checking to see if this was done, he issued DIRM FOR ONGWW02 REV and got the following back

Re: VM VTAM Question

2011-04-28 Thread Wandschneider, Scott
, Scott -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:46 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: VM VTAM Question I think you are right Ivan. I just tried it. Vtam prefix has

Re: VM VTAM Question

2011-04-28 Thread Marcy Cortes
r 05 ignore ? (or just do TCP/IP :) Marcy -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Wandschneider, Scott Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:07 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VM VTAM Question But - here

Re: VM VTAM Question

2011-04-28 Thread Wandschneider, Scott
Subject: Re: VM VTAM Question r 05 ignore ? (or just do TCP/IP :) Marcy -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Wandschneider, Scott Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:07 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VM VTAM

Re: VM VTAM Question

2011-04-28 Thread Marcy Cortes
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VM VTAM Question Wow the problem was the comma. I removed it and it worked. Thank you very much! Thank you, Scott -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 3:00 PM

DB2 VM/VSE migration question

2011-04-27 Thread Ed Zell
This is being cross posted to the VSE and VM lists. Would anyone care to share their experiences in migrating from DB/2 on VM/VSE to DB/2 on I-series and DB2LUW? We are looking at one option, and I am curious if anyone has opinions (good or bad) about this type of migration. If you prefer, you

VM VTAM Question

2011-04-27 Thread Wandschneider, Scott
Last week we were attempting to activate our NCP from VM/VTAM and received the following message. My question is, how does one respond? I tried 00,ignore or 00 ignore or vtam 00 ignore or net 00 ignore - Nothing worked 00 IST937A NCPNET6 CORRELATOR MISMATCH 04/27/06 21:36:13 - 07/16/08 15:00

Re: VM VTAM Question

2011-04-27 Thread Lizette Koehler
Did you try R 00,ignore Lizette -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Wandschneider, Scott Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:30 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: VM VTAM Question Last week we were attempting

Re: VM VTAM Question

2011-04-27 Thread Marcy Cortes
VTAM Question Did you try R 00,ignore Lizette -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Wandschneider, Scott Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:30 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: VM VTAM Question Last week we

Re: VM VTAM Question

2011-04-27 Thread Ivan Warren
On 4/28/2011 5:46 AM, Marcy Cortes wrote: I'm pretty sure it's vtam r 00,ignore It's been a long while though! Marcy Isn't 'reply' a standard GCS command (part of the OS emulation in GCS) In which case, it would definitely be 'r 00,ignore' issued from the virtual machine hosting VTAM.

Re: VM VTAM Question

2011-04-27 Thread Marcy Cortes
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VM VTAM Question On 4/28/2011 5:46 AM, Marcy Cortes wrote: I'm pretty sure it's vtam r 00,ignore It's been a long while though! Marcy Isn't 'reply' a standard GCS command (part of the OS emulation in GCS) In which case, it would definitely be 'r 00,ignore

Re: VM question - QIDLE

2011-04-11 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
Redirect... Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. From: owner-vs...@lehigh.edu [mailto:owner-vs...@lehigh.edu] On Behalf Of Wakser, David Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 10:41 AM To: VSE Discussion List Subject: VM question - QIDLE Since our email addresses were

Re: VM question - QIDLE

2011-04-11 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
[mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank M. Ramaekers Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 08:47 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] VM question - QIDLE Redirect... Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. From: owner-vs...@lehigh.edu [mailto:owner-vs

Re: VM question - QIDLE

2011-04-11 Thread Barton Robinson
] *On Behalf Of *Frank M. Ramaekers *Sent:* Monday, April 11, 2011 08:47 *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU *Subject:* Re: [IBMVM] VM question - QIDLE Redirect… Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. *From:* owner-vs

DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Karl Kingston
Hi All. Just noticed something when we did a DIRM FREEXT to see what free extents were and we got this on one of our systems: VOLUME DEVTYPE -- FREE EXTENTS --- $$ 3380 START= 1 AVAIL= 500 $$ 3380 START= 503 AVAIL= 382 VM1L0A 3390 START= 1 AVAIL= 1112 VM1L06 3390 START=

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread william JANULIN
Karl,     Are they in your SYSTEM CONFIG file?   Bill J. --- On Fri, 4/8/11, Karl Kingston karlkings...@ongov.net wrote: From: Karl Kingston karlkings...@ongov.net Subject: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: Friday, April 8, 2011, 10:28 AM Hi All. Just

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Karl Kingston
Bill, They are not.. Only volumes I have in the SYSTEM CONFIG is the PAGING and Spool volumes as well as SYSRES. From: william JANULIN wjanulin0...@yahoo.com To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 04/08/2011 10:34 AM Subject:Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD Sent

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Joe . DiPippo
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 04/08/2011 10:39 AM Subject:Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Bill, They are not.. Only volumes I have in the SYSTEM CONFIG is the PAGING and Spool volumes as well as SYSRES

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Karl Kingston
Joe, Searched the directory but didn't find them. From: joe.dipi...@frit.frb.org To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 04/08/2011 10:44 AM Subject:Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Karl, I believe

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Joe . DiPippo
Karl, Did you run a DIRM DIRMAP? Joseph Di Pippo Operating Systems Programmer III FRIT Computing Services z/OS, z/VM, Hardware Support 1-201-531-3820 From: Karl Kingston karlkings...@ongov.net To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 04/08/2011 10:47 AM Subject:Re: DIRMAINT question

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Karl Kingston
...@frit.frb.org To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 04/08/2011 10:54 AM Subject:Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Karl, Did you run a DIRM DIRMAP? Joseph Di Pippo Operating Systems Programmer III FRIT

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Joe . DiPippo
From: Karl Kingston karlkings...@ongov.net To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 04/08/2011 10:57 AM Subject:Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Yes, the DIRMAP shows: VM1L0A 3390

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Karl Kingston
VCONTROL file? where do I find this? From: joe.dipi...@frit.frb.org To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 04/08/2011 11:00 AM Subject:Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Karl, You are saying

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Joe . DiPippo
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 04/08/2011 11:05 AM Subject:Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU VCONTROL file? where do I find this? From:joe.dipi...@frit.frb.org To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Karl Kingston
Found them. So how do I get rid of them? From: joe.dipi...@frit.frb.org To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 04/08/2011 11:08 AM Subject:Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Karl, The VCONTROL files

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Joe . DiPippo
:Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Found them. So how do I get rid of them? From:joe.dipi...@frit.frb.org To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date:04/08/2011 11:08 AM Subject

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Scott Rohling
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date:04/08/2011 11:11 AM Subject:Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU -- Found them. So how do I get rid of them? From:joe.dipi...@frit.frb.org

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Scott Rohling
Kingston karlkings...@ongov.net To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date:04/08/2011 11:11 AM Subject:Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU -- Found them. So how do I get rid

Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD

2011-04-08 Thread Karl Kingston
Thanks guys. It's fixed.All I did was a DIRM RLDE to reload the extents file. I think that took care of it. From: Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 04/08/2011 11:37 AM Subject:Re: DIRMAINT question regarding DASD Sent

Re: XEDIT question

2011-04-07 Thread Les Koehler
- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Les Koehler Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:23 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: XEDIT question You can do it IF you're willing to change the file itself just to display it. Then, of course, you can't

Re: XEDIT question

2011-04-07 Thread Tom Huegel
. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Les Koehler Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:23 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: XEDIT question You can do it IF you're willing to change the file itself just to display

Re: XEDIT question

2011-04-07 Thread David Boyes
Have a look at XCOL from the vm download library. You could probably use that as a starting place. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Huegel Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 9:50 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: XEDIT question Yes I

Re: XEDIT question

2011-04-07 Thread Kris Buelens
that as a starting place. *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Tom Huegel *Sent:* Thursday, April 07, 2011 9:50 AM *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU *Subject:* Re: XEDIT question Yes I have toyed with IOS3270 in the past. This application just isn't worth

XEDIT question

2011-04-06 Thread Tom Huegel
I don't do XEDIT macro's that often so this may be obvious to some, but I can't seem to find the 'how to' answer. Is there a way, (how to do it?) to set screen attributes on a file? The SET RESERVED is fine it I want to affect the whole row, but I want to highlight-skip columns of data from the

Re: XEDIT question

2011-04-06 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: XEDIT question I don't do XEDIT macro's that often so this may be obvious to some, but I can't seem to find the 'how to' answer. Is there a way, (how to do it?) to set screen attributes on a file? The SET RESERVED is fine it I want to affect the whole row

Re: XEDIT question

2011-04-06 Thread Tom Huegel
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Tom Huegel *Sent:* Wednesday, April 06, 2011 9:34 AM *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU *Subject:* XEDIT question I don't do XEDIT macro's that often so this may be obvious to some, but I can't seem to find the 'how to' answer. Is there a way, (how to do it?) to set screen

Re: XEDIT question

2011-04-06 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Huegel Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 10:07 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: XEDIT question Is there an example somewhere you can point me to? Basically all I

Re: XEDIT question

2011-04-06 Thread Maxim Bochagov
Tom, the best way is a practice, just try to explore how it works. As example you can use existing highlights, like: *help perfkit tasks* and compare the output and source file: PERFKIT HELPTASK. The keyword is QUERY CTLCHAR. 2011/4/6 Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com Can anyone point me in the

Re: XEDIT question

2011-04-06 Thread Les Koehler
You can do it IF you're willing to change the file itself just to display it. Then, of course, you can't make text changes and save it in its original form. There are better tools available if that's what you want to do. Les Tom Huegel wrote: I don't do XEDIT macro's that often so this may

Re: XEDIT question

2011-04-06 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
Of Les Koehler Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:23 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: XEDIT question You can do it IF you're willing to change the file itself just to display it. Then, of course, you can't make text changes and save it in its original form. There are better tools

Re: XEDIT question

2011-04-06 Thread Les Koehler
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Les Koehler Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:23 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: XEDIT question You can do it IF you're willing to change the file itself just to display it. Then, of course, you can't make text changes and save it in its original form

Re: XEDIT question

2011-04-06 Thread Tom Huegel
] On Behalf Of Les Koehler Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:23 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: XEDIT question You can do it IF you're willing to change the file itself just to display it. Then, of course, you can't make text changes and save it in its original form. There are better

Re: DDR Question

2011-03-31 Thread Maxim Bochagov
And plus. Please do not forget about contents of backuped data, it may be not compressable at all ;) So, this DASD requires maximum tape count. And a big number of clear DASDs (just formatted) may fit into one tape at the same time. The software compression case permits to calculate estimated

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >