2008/9/30 narendra sisodiya [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Can somebody make a script based on this command to take screenshot while
installation of any Linux OS
* Press Ctrl+Alt+F2
* mount a external drive or any unused partition
* xwd -root | xwdtopnm | pnmtopng Screenshot1.png
* You need to modify
On Tuesday 30 Sep 2008, narendra sisodiya wrote:
[snip]
PS1: Do anybody has any wired thought for X screenrecording while
installation, You may need to install packages to the running OS by
which you are installing,
For base Linux installation for clients I take digicam photos at each
prompt
Hi,
--- On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Sandip Bhattacharya
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I actually find this kind of intra-community bickering in the Linux
| community very disturbing.
\--
It takes only two people to have a misunderstanding.
---
| What is the problem with all you folks ?
\--
Hi Yatnatti,
On face of it, I can see what your objection is.
but brother, remember that since Linux is Open Source RedHat is bound to
release the source codes of whatever they sell--- and if someone wants--
s/he can have/distribute for zero or very low price (even 1 cent) what
RedHat sells for
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 14:25:47 narendra sisodiya wrote:
debian-installer has such a thing built in.
http://wiki.debian.org/ScreenShots#debian-instsaller-gui
Cool, I was not aware of this fact, never noticed, ( as I am a fedora
guy )
AFAIR, Anaconda has screenshot capability for
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 06:18:32 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
And Ubuntu's effort in feeding back patches to Debian have
not really impressed the Debian developers that much (apart, perhaps,
from those being paid by Mark).
So, let me get this straight. You find the efforts of full-time
Hi People...
A QUick question; for some basics.
Assume I have a ubuntu (or ubuntu studio) linux install.
Also, assume that I have a JAR file--- in which there's a class exposing a
main() function--- which runs perfectly-- on a system with latest JDK---
when I click the JAR file.
How to create a
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 15:59:49 Nalin Savara wrote:
Is there some script or package--- with which I can package it the
way one packages MSI files on windows-- so that the script/installer
copies the jar file into appropriate directories-- and creates
desktop and
Applications-menu
Hi Swapnil
I recently installed Debian Lenny (network install), but I am unable to play
DivX or avi files. It could play mpeg files though.
AVI files play by default for vlc. There is however an issue with
certain divx files (also real media files) whose support is an issue.
Install w32codecs
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Nalin Savara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi People...
A QUick question; for some basics.
Assume I have a ubuntu (or ubuntu studio) linux install.
Also, assume that I have a JAR file--- in which there's a class exposing a
main() function--- which runs
Hi All
I am trying to make a local debian archive mirror using the
anonftpsync script got from http://www.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror
The exact script I am using for making the rsync mirror is given at
end of post. It basically is expected to run rsync for whichever
architectures I want. I just
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
As far as being a good FOSS citizen, I have always believed that helping
fixing bugs upstream is better than having distro specific patches. I
must admit, I cannot say how well Ubuntu does in this regard, however I
have seen many launchpad bugs referencing the
Hi,
Install vmware or virtual box in your host..Then using the virtualbox
install the operating system(guest) you want to take screenshotWhile
installing just take screenshot from your host operating system..If you want
to live capture use camstudio2.0 (its a freesoftware) incase of windows
I read some where in the internet that, canonical is not contributing back
to its mother distribution debian.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Parthan SR [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
As far as being a good FOSS citizen, I have always believed that helping
fixing
You have created an application in java and combined all the classes to
create a jar file..If you double click it the application is working well
and good...
Now you want to create a installer or something for that jar file so that
it creates application short cut on the desktop and add
hi everyone
i have a problem with ldap serverconfiguration..
problem facing in the root.ldif file
after adding new entry: uid=root,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
i.e. ldap_add: No such object (32)
==
file : root.ldif
==
dn: uid=root,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
uid: root
Arun SAG wrote:
I read some where in the internet that, canonical is not contributing back
to its mother distribution debian.
Leaving the debate whether the underlying accusation is true or false,
please when you are making a statement do state the following,
[1] completely describe
I came across this blog..What are your comments..
http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/
--
-Fighting 4 Freedom-
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Arun SAG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have created an application in java and combined all the classes to
create a jar file..If you double click it the application is working well
and good...
Now you want to create a installer or something for that jar file so
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Arun SAG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came across this blog..What are your comments..
http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/
This blog is very educative and it is a valuable resource in that it
tells a person like me, the things a certain type of customer
yeah sure..sorry for that...By the way here is the link
http://lwn.net/Articles/293906/
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Parthan SR [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Arun SAG wrote:
I read some where in the internet that, canonical is not contributing
back
to its mother distribution debian.
I think , 50% of our mailing topics can be discussed at debatepedia,
for example like this -
http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Debate:Open_source_software
;)
Because of day by day increasing demand of debates on our mailing list, I
will suggest, we should start using idebate for this purpose, or
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 03:57:44PM +0800, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 06:18:32 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
And Ubuntu's effort in feeding back patches to Debian have
not really impressed the Debian developers that much (apart, perhaps,
from those being paid
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 20:14:50 Arun SAG wrote:
I came across this blog..What are your comments..
http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/
I think it is quite an interesting perspective, presented in a ...
uh ... very temperate manner. ;) Well, it would be good for the Linux
community
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 20:14:50 Arun SAG wrote:
I came across this blog..What are your comments..
http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/
With the help of the site above, I came across another - which seems
quite a bit less foul and juvenile, and where the author somewhat knows
more
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 20:12:50 tarun singhal wrote:
problem facing in the root.ldif file
after adding new entry: uid=root,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
i.e. ldap_add: No such object (32)
==
file : root.ldif
==
dn: uid=root,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
uid:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 20:36:02 Arun SAG wrote:
yeah sure..sorry for that...By the way here is the link
http://lwn.net/Articles/293906/
Strange that you quote that article for the accusation about Ubuntu and
the only takeaway that you had was that it is not contributing. Maybe
you
On Tue, Sep 30 2008, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 06:14:31 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I don't think that anyone is arguing that canonical, and
ubuntu, do not provide a useful product, nor that the product they
provide is popular.
The point is whether
On Tue, Sep 30 2008, Parthan SR wrote:
Arun SAG wrote:
I read some where in the internet that, canonical is not contributing back
to its mother distribution debian.
Leaving the debate whether the underlying accusation is true or false,
please when you are making a statement do state
On Tue, Sep 30 2008, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 06:18:32 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
And Ubuntu's effort in feeding back patches to Debian have
not really impressed the Debian developers that much (apart, perhaps,
from those being paid by Mark).
So, let me
On Tue, Sep 30 2008, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 20:36:02 Arun SAG wrote:
yeah sure..sorry for that...By the way here is the link
http://lwn.net/Articles/293906/
Strange that you quote that article for the accusation about Ubuntu and
the only takeaway that
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30 2008, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
There is nothing that requires it, no. But then, we are not
talking about requirements, we are talking about whether Ubuntu fits
into the free software
narendra sisodiya wrote:
I think , 50% of our mailing topics can be discussed at debatepedia,
for example like this -
http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Debate:Open_source_software
;)
I had a look.
The 'Yes' and 'No' tag on that requires ''inconvenient reformulation
of possible questions''.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is said that all the users are testing the software. What is
the point of having testers when the benefit is not passed on upstream
to benefit everyone? That is the critical point in Greg's talk. Ubuntu
On Tue, Sep 30 2008, Gaurav Mishra wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is said that all the users are testing the software. What is
the point of having testers when the benefit is not passed on upstream
to benefit everyone? That is
On Tue, Sep 30 2008, Gaurav Mishra wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30 2008, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
There is nothing that requires it, no. But then, we are not
talking about requirements, we are talking about whether
Gaurav Mishra wrote:
GPL doens`t says that when you use some code , Go spoonfeed the
changes back to developers, The code is open all there , And the point
made by canonical not to make it upstream for each project is valid
and practical. No way some company go behind 1000`s bugzilla to track
On Tuesday 30 Sep 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
[snip]
Frankly, I do not buy the statement that Ubuntu can't do what
Fedora does. I think perhaps it is to Ubuntu's competitive advantage
to be the only distro with the fixes they create?
Actually any distribution that doesn't feed
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Nalin Savara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assume I have a ubuntu (or ubuntu studio) linux install.
Also, assume that I have a JAR file--- in which there's a class exposing a
main() function--- which runs perfectly-- on a system with latest JDK---
when I click the
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Mehul Ved [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, you can use build.opensuse.org to do that thus have
readily installable binaries for all distribution,
Hi Mehul,
Thanks.
I did visit build.opensuse.org and read some pages on that site.
Based on my first glance there
I did visit build.opensuse.org and read some pages on that site.
Based on my first glance there are quite a few open loops in my
understanding of the same.
If you have used build.opensuse.org; then can you please take a moment to
talk a bit about the steps you went through, to build a
I came across this blog..What are your comments..
http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/
I absolutely love this blog. Whoever is behind the blog actually knows
what he's talking about. He's not a random cribbing user. It'd
actually do the community a lot of good if we take the person's
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:41:05 -0500
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
There is nothing that requires it, no. But then, we are not
talking about requirements, we are talking about whether Ubuntu fits
into the free software ecosystem, instead of leeching off it.
[...]
I
On Tue, Sep 30 2008, Gora Mohanty wrote:
I did not want to get involved in this thread, as I have
little direct knowledge of the topics being discussed.
However, can I ask everyone who is against Ubuntu about
their viewpoints on BossLinux? I do not mean to pick a
fight here, but would really
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:47 AM, M.S.Yatnatti CEO KPN UNLIMITD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Every Body,
Could you dare to challenge if redhat puts its logo and art work at
your property and products and claim trademark ownership rights ? in
the similar way would you object redhat which has
PJ wrote:
how many open source projects have they been
working on that are now gold ?
So, ubuntu is not contributing back upstream into debian.
ahem... well, the point was more about Canonical, not Ubuntu.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manoj,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I don't agree to this point at all. Ubuntu is where it is because of
it's community.
Absolutely, and the technical community around Ubuntu is called Debian.
And Ubuntu's effort in feeding back patches to Debian have not
really impressed the Debian
47 matches
Mail list logo
