:19 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
Janis,
I may not completely understand exactly what you're trying to do.
What happens when you choose Edit Detail? Can you then copy your
detail?
Dede
/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:09:33 +0100
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail
Message -
From: Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 3:09 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
ronald ferguson wrote
I'm afraid that I have only loosely been following
Elizabeth,
Precisely. I think the conversation long ago passed the point of being about
_trying_ to do it (did you see my most recent post?) and became a
conversation about clarifying exactly what _did_ happen when they merged.
In point of fact, I several days ago evolved a plan for replacing
Dede Holden wrote
Based on what Geoff and Dave B have said, I think my source and details
were pretty clear cut - no conflicts so everything combined like it was
supposed to.
If you did indeed do exactly what you described in your original post,
you merged the *new* Source into the *old*
Jenny,
My newly combined source does have the bullet beside it. That's one
of the first questions I posted after I combined the sources and Geoff
responded that the bullet means the source was created with the new
Source Writer. I thought that in itself is a great feature so that
you will know
I think what Janis and I were talking about has to do with what
happens to the source detail. When you merge an old master source
(which has one or more details attached to it) into a new sourcewriter
source, the new source does replace the old one as expected. The
source details associated with
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged Master
Sources
I think what Janis and I were talking about has to do with what
happens to the source detail. When you merge an old master source
(which has one or more details attached to it) into a new sourcewriter
@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
I think what Janis and I were talking about has to do with what
happens to the source detail. When you merge an old master source
(which has one or more details attached to it) into a new
situation.
Janis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gail Nestor
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 7:27 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
I think what Janis
Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
Janis Gilmore wrote
Nothing, however, will enable access to the old source detail, in spite
of the fact that it is partially visible.
(Gee, this is hard to describe!)
It is quite normal that you cannot access that old detail because you
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 7:55 AM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated
with newly Merged
Master Sources
Gail,
I'm a little puzzled - have you
Going to the Assigned Sources Screen, where do you see
the 'lost words'? Go to Text/Comments, or other
choices. You cannot edit the info, but you can copy it
all and move it to the new correct place.
I am not sure if this is your spot. Some of them, can
be copied in scroll mode (?name?) so in this
- but there is no
way to copy it for pasting.
Is that more clear?
Janis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RICHARD
SCHULTHIES
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 5:36 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated
RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote
Going to the Assigned Sources Screen, where do you see the 'lost
words'? Go to Text/Comments, or other choices. You cannot edit the
info, but you can copy it all and move it to the new correct place. I
am not sure if this is your spot. Some of them, can be copied in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RICHARD
SCHULTHIES
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 5:36 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
Going to the Assigned Sources
Of Dede Holden
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 7:19 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
Janis,
I may not completely understand exactly what you're trying to do.
What happens when you choose Edit Detail? Can you
-Australia
--
From: Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 8:59 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote
Going
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Janis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, Dede, you cannot copy the detail. When you choose Edit Detail, you get
the new (and empty) Source Writer detail screen. The details of the citation
are nowhere to be seen. They are not accessible.
Janis
Janis -- I
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
Janis,
I may not completely understand exactly what you're trying to do.
What happens when you choose Edit Detail? Can you then copy your
detail?
Dede
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008
. They are not accessible.
Janis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dede Holden
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 7:19 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
it for pasting.
Is that more clear?
Janis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of RICHARD
SCHULTHIES
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 5:36 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated
with newly
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dede Holden
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 9:20 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
I guess, like Rich, I don't understand where it is you can see the
detail that you can't
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dede Holden
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 4:52 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
Gail and Janis,
I have done the same thing. I took a source that had lots of
different
: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 4:52 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
Gail and Janis,
I have done the same thing. I took a source that had lots of
different source details for several generations. I created
that DeDe was successful at this.
Janis Walker Gilmore
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dede Holden
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:00 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
DeDe (and Gail),
That's exactly what I did, except with a census source. Gail, is that what
you did when you tried to combine an old source with a new source, and lost
the citation detail?
Just
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
DeDe (and Gail),
That's exactly what I did, except with a census source. Gail, is that what
you did when you tried to combine an old source with a new source, and lost
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janis
Gilmore
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:39 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
I just tried merging it the opposite
, June 19, 2008 9:07 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
DeDe (and Gail),
That's exactly what I did, except with a census source. Gail, is that what
you did when you tried to combine an old source
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff
Rasmussen
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 11:54 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
Janis,
In one of the emails I wrote yesterday I included Dave B.'s (programmer
, June 19, 2008 11:54 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged
Master Sources
Janis,
In one of the emails I wrote yesterday I included Dave B.'s (programmer)
comments about this, he basically said that this won't work
Gail Nestor wrote
I decided to start a new topic here for this question. I created a new
master source for a census. Then I merged an existing master source
used by 5 individuals into the new master source. The master source
looked good and the source detail does seem to have stayed
Gail,
This is exactly what happened to me when I merged two census sources.
Any thoughts, Geoff?
Janis Walker Gilmore
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gail Nestor
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 5:48 PM
To: Legacy User Group
Subject:
Gail,
I asked Dave about this last night and this was his response:
Well, it makes a body think... I don't think we have even looked at the
combine master sources code on the master source list. If someone chooses
an old master source (with various detail citations using it) and then
combines
Gail and Janis,
I have done the same thing. I took a source that had lots of
different source details for several generations. I created a new
Master Source using the Source Writer. I combined the two. My
details stayed exactly where they were supposed to! I did not have to
re-enter any of
From: Dede Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 3:52:03 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Source Detail associated with newly Merged Master
Sources
As soon as they tweak the subsequent citation problem, this is going
to be the best thing
] Old Source Detail associated
with newly Merged Master Sources
As soon as they tweak the subsequent citation
problem, this is going
to be the best thing to happen to us since the
GEDCOM!
Dede Holden
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
38 matches
Mail list logo
