On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:29:47PM -0500, jesse wrote:
I...totally remember that. Perhaps it was Namp! (Linked from
perl.apache.org)
The first two google hits for Namp are North American Meat Processors
and National Association of Mold Professionals. Which cheered me up,
anyway.
--
Bruce
Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:29:47PM -0500, jesse wrote:
I...totally remember that. Perhaps it was Namp! (Linked from
perl.apache.org)
The first two google hits for Namp are North American Meat Processors
and National Association of Mold Professionals. Which cheered me
I got An error has been encountered in accessing this page
-Arun
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Mike Woods m...@geofront.co.uk wrote:
Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:29:47PM -0500, jesse wrote:
I...totally remember that. Perhaps it was Namp! (Linked from
Someone at work has just asked me whether I recall a little mod_perl based
media server where you
* point it at a tree of media files
* request media in various formats
* it guesses the media type from the requested extension and transcodes to that
format on the fly
Does that ring bells
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 04:23:51PM +, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Someone at work has just asked me whether I recall a little mod_perl based
media server where you
* point it at a tree of media files
* request media in various formats
* it guesses the media type from the requested
On 2 Dec 2009, at 17:29, jesse wrote:
I...totally remember that. Perhaps it was Namp! (Linked from
perl.apache.org)
Ah - I reckon that's it. Thanks Jesse :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
In case any mod_perl users here aren't on the list or missed it...
-- Forwarded message --
From: adam.prime
Date: 2008/7/7
Subject: mod_perl users survey
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At the impromptu mod_perl BOF at YAPC::NA, Fred Moyer any myself
hacked together a short mod_perl
Alex McLintock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A slightly different question to the one Simon just asked but does anyone
use mod_gzip with mod_perl? I found that they interfered with each other so
in the end I disabled mod_gzip on mod_perl generated pages.
I haven't looked at this in about a year
The application is an existing (working prototype) web-based campaign
marketing tool which among other things processes both outbound and
inbound email and text messages.
Principal requirements: you will be need to become conversant with the
existing Perl / mod_perl / DBI code and overall
to become conversant with the
existing Perl / mod_perl / DBI code and overall approach, bring some
aspects of the coding (e.g. module structures, object method
approaches) up to professional standard (it was and is a working
prototype), add two new system features to quite precise requirements
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 09:00:52PM +0100, Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[ something that really wasn't supposed to go to the list ]
bugger! bugger! bugger!
Sorry about that.
Dave...
--
Two slightly distorted guitars
Ben wrote:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/libperl.so into server:
/usr/local/apache/libexec/libperl.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Ipatchlevel_ptr
Could it be that you're using an Apache/mod_perl that was built with one
version of Perl, and you've later installed a new version of Perl?
A
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 10:08:27AM +0100, Andy Wardley wrote:
Ben wrote:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/libperl.so into server:
/usr/local/apache/libexec/libperl.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Ipatchlevel_ptr
Could it be that you're using an Apache/mod_perl that was built with one
think it gets perl right at all, or at least not the way I use
it. That's why I typically install into /usr/local/perl*[0] and if I
need it, I build mod_perl against the debian apache as a dso.
[0]
% ls -d /usr/local/perl* | wc -l
14
No, really.
--
Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it doesn't
get right IMNSHO are Apache and Perl.
I don't think it gets perl right at all, or at least not the way I use
it. That's why I typically install into /usr/local/perl*[0] and if I
need it, I build mod_perl against the debian apache as a dso.
Plan. I think I'll do
, apt / dpkg gets a lot of things right. Two of the
things it doesn't
get right IMNSHO are Apache and Perl.
I don't think it gets perl right at all, or at least not the way I use
it. That's why I typically install into /usr/local/perl*[0] and if I
need it, I build mod_perl against
Hi,
Anyone know anything about this load error from mod_perl:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/libperl.so into server:
/usr/local/apache/libexec/libperl.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Ipatchlevel_ptr
I'm running apache 1.3.28 and mod_perl 1.28 and the build seems to happen fine, but it
just
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:43:27PM +0100, Phil Lanch wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:38:57PM +0100, Joel Bernstein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:30:03AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
you don't want $r-pathinfo (which won't be set during trans). you
want $r-uri, which will be
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:58:39AM +0100, Joel Bernstein wrote:
Doesn't seem to be. We've currently gone for a custom ErrorDocument 404
page, which does some processing and either 404s or redirects to the
user page, having done a db lookup to check if it's a valid user. Which
is a bit cracky,
Hi,
I would not be surprised if this problem has arisen due to me expecting
more from Apache+mod_perl than it's capable of.
The server is running Apache 1.3.mumble with mod_perl and mod_php. The
site has been entirely built in PHP, by somebody else. They want the
facility for http://foo.bar.com
you don't want $r-pathinfo (which won't be set during trans). you
want $r-uri, which will be something like /THISBITHERE.
Then again, it's early here, so this could all be wrong. :)
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rather than a mod_perl thing - does
trans seem like the appropriate stage for this to run at?
Also, even if it's failing on this count, then none of the cases should
probably work, and it should be catching the return DECLINED; final
catch-all case, no? In which case, for non-/name type pages (eg
At 13:38 +0100 6/17/03, Joel Bernstein wrote:
This one is really really bugging me - can anybody suggest an
alternative way to do this redirection (I think it's too complicated a
case for mod_rewrite)?
I don't think so. I think this should do the trick:
RewriteRule ^/david
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:57:48PM +0200, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 13:38 +0100 6/17/03, Joel Bernstein wrote:
This one is really really bugging me - can anybody suggest an
alternative way to do this redirection (I think it's too complicated a
case for mod_rewrite)?
I don't think so. I
At 16:35 +0100 6/17/03, Joel Bernstein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:57:48PM +0200, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
RewriteRule ^/david
http://foo.bar.com/?page=publicprofile.phpname=david [R,L]
or possibly even:
RewriteRule ^/david /?page=publicprofile.phpname=david [R,L]
I
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:38:57PM +0100, Joel Bernstein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:30:03AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
you don't want $r-pathinfo (which won't be set during trans). you
want $r-uri, which will be something like /THISBITHERE.
The only difference that makes is
On Saturday, Dec 14, 2002, at 00:17 Europe/London, Dirk Koopman wrote:
Nice article, but doesn't really answer the question, which is: is
FastCGI as scalable as mod_perl?
I suspect the answer depends on what exactly you mean by scalable.
Usually the answer to questions like this is FastCGI
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:54:24PM +0100, Robin Berjon wrote:
Gzip and Apache::Clean are your friends.
Gzip because it's actually net faster to compress the outgoing data to get
rid of outgoing connections sooner? Or just because CPU is cheaper than
bandwidth?
Usually
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 12:17:27AM +, Dirk Koopman wrote:
Let's not mess about, our victim (says he) needs 300 page views a
second. This isn't a matter of opinion here, this is solid number
territory.
Well, quantified estimate territory. But that's not the important part - we
have a
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Having looked at some of the crap in HTML, it seems to be lots of font and
colo(u)r tags, things more tersely done once in a CSS, especially if the
spec is allowed to say we're aiming at $modern browser where modern is
defined to mean CSS works. And
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 04:04:28PM +, Simon Wilcox wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Having looked at some of the crap in HTML, it seems to be lots of font and
colo(u)r tags, things more tersely done once in a CSS, especially if the
spec is allowed to say we're aiming
Without going into lots of detail about what this is, since I'm trying
to be generic, has anyone here been involved with mod_perl sites that
do a substantial amount of full HTML page (i.e. non-banner-ad)
traffic? There'll be some SQL and Template Toolkit business going on
as well. I'm trying
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:58:20PM +, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Without going into lots of detail about what this is, since I'm trying
to be generic, has anyone here been involved with mod_perl sites that
do a substantial amount of full HTML page (i.e. non-banner-ad)
traffic? There'll be some
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:58:20PM +, Paul Makepeace wrote:
The draft at the moment is wanting to support 2000 simultaneous users
with approx 1m page views/*hour* (300/s ish) i.e. each of those users
hitting about one page every six or seven seconds (by my calculations).
Is this totally
Cluster of 12 dual 1GHz pentium machines with 1 or 2Gb memory running
mod_perl on *BSD or Linux. Layer7 load balancing switches to
distribute the traffic in a sensible manner. Pair of big, fat Solaris
servers running Oracle. Another pair of PCs to serve static content.
If it dosen't go fast
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 15:58, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Without going into lots of detail about what this is, since I'm trying
to be generic, has anyone here been involved with mod_perl sites that
do a substantial amount of full HTML page (i.e. non-banner-ad)
traffic? There'll be some SQL
David Cantrell wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:58:20PM +, Paul Makepeace wrote:
The draft at the moment is wanting to support 2000 simultaneous users
with approx 1m page views/*hour* (300/s ish) i.e. each of those users
hitting about one page every six or seven seconds (by my
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Steve Keay wrote:
Cluster of 12 dual 1GHz pentium machines with 1 or 2Gb memory running
mod_perl on *BSD or Linux. Layer7 load balancing switches to
distribute the traffic in a sensible manner. Pair of big, fat Solaris
servers running Oracle. Another pair of PCs
dual 1GHz pentium machines with 1 or 2Gb memory running
mod_perl on *BSD or Linux. Layer7 load balancing switches to
distribute the traffic in a sensible manner. Pair of big, fat Solaris
servers running Oracle. Another pair of PCs to serve static content.
Sounds the closest to a real
the
implication of the word Oracle here?
Dirk
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 16:55, the hatter wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Steve Keay wrote:
Cluster of 12 dual 1GHz pentium machines with 1 or 2Gb memory running
mod_perl on *BSD or Linux. Layer7 load balancing switches to
distribute
I am going to try again, this time (hopefully) I have read the question!
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 15:58, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Without going into lots of detail about what this is, since I'm trying
to be generic, has anyone here been involved with mod_perl sites that
do a substantial amount
Wow - thank you everyone (including essuu and Dirk who helped offlist)!
Very reassuring hearing basically the same numbers and thoughts coming
up. I had an idea of around 30/s and this seems to confirm it with
bells, hints, tips on.
FWIW, it's a collaborative project mgmt site (lots of dynamic,
OK, so this is part II I suppose. The perl webapp mantra seems to be
use mod_perl! but IM[OE] it's a dog of an environment. Sure, lots of
people love it, but I think that's mostly because they've suffered
through trauma and it has developed that appeal of a
conquered-but-has-it-got-something-up
Paul Makepeace wrote:
Has anyone else used FCGI recently? (I heard it was a bit shabby in
yonder days.) In particular what situations is mod_perl a real win, and
worth putting up with the pain?
I haven't used it in a while, but back when I tried it you had no access to
Apache's API. IOW
On Friday 13 December 2002 15:58, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Without going into lots of detail about what this is, since I'm trying
to be generic, has anyone here been involved with mod_perl sites that
do a substantial amount of full HTML page (i.e. non-banner-ad)
traffic? There'll be some SQL
Steve Keay wrote:
Cluster of 12 dual 1GHz pentium machines with 1 or 2Gb memory running
mod_perl on *BSD or Linux. Layer7 load balancing switches to
distribute the traffic in a sensible manner. Pair of big, fat Solaris
servers running Oracle. Another pair of PCs to serve static content.
You
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:54:24PM +0100, Robin Berjon wrote:
Gzip and Apache::Clean are your friends.
Gzip because it's actually net faster to compress the outgoing data to get
rid of outgoing connections sooner? Or just because CPU is cheaper than
bandwidth?
To keep IO at sane(r) levels, at
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 17:53, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Has anyone else used FCGI recently? (I heard it was a bit shabby in
yonder days.) In particular what situations is mod_perl a real win, and
worth putting up with the pain?
Did goole not find the paper wot I wrote for Emap?
http
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:54:24PM +0100, Robin Berjon wrote:
Gzip and Apache::Clean are your friends.
Gzip because it's actually net faster to compress the outgoing data to get
rid of outgoing connections sooner? Or just because CPU is cheaper
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 22:33, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 17:53, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Has anyone else used FCGI recently? (I heard it was a bit shabby in
yonder days.) In particular what situations is mod_perl a real win, and
worth putting up with the pain?
Did goole
Alistair Francis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi All,
As I mentioned to Dave Hodgkinson, and the london.pm list in the process
(!), I have just taken over responsibility for the development team for
the Olympics project.
I had assumed that I had seen all of the CVs which were submitted via
] mod_perl engineer
Alistair Francis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi All,
As I mentioned to Dave Hodgkinson, and the london.pm list in the process
(!), I have just taken over responsibility for the development team for
the Olympics project.
I had assumed that I had seen all of the CVs which
Hi,
Ticketmaster UK are looking for a mod_perl developer with the skills
listed below. The position has previously been posted on jobs.perl.org but
as of yet we have not found a suitable candidate.
If you are interested in applying for the role, please reply to me with a
copy of your CV (ascii
Alistair Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Ticketmaster UK are looking for a mod_perl developer with the skills
listed below. The position has previously been posted on jobs.perl.org but
as of yet we have not found a suitable candidate.
Some replies to resumes that were directly
,
Alistair
On 1 Oct 2002, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Alistair Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Ticketmaster UK are looking for a mod_perl developer with the skills
listed below. The position has previously been posted on jobs.perl.org but
as of yet we have not found a suitable candidate
Alistair Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I sincerely apologise for us not getting back to you. I have just joined
the project and am taking responsibility for getting the team together.
I don't have a copy of you CV (even though I have been through many of the
CVs from jobserve) and, if
A job! A job!
- Forwarded message from Perl Jobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Perl Jobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Perl Jobs] OO Perl / mod_perl programmer for Web CMS (onsite),
United Kingdom, Sheffield
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 5 Jul 2002 15:56:05 -
Online URL for this job
Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Forwarded for anyone currently searching for a job who doesn't mind
dodgy hotmail accounts]
Can anyone say perfect job?
Smells like sports.com.
--
Dave Hodgkinson, Wizard for Hire http://www.davehodgkinson.com
Editor-in-chief, The Highway
[Forwarded for anyone currently searching for a job who doesn't mind
dodgy hotmail accounts]
Can anyone say perfect job?
Leon
- Forwarded message from Perl Jobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Perl Jobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Perl Jobs] Perl Developer - Perl/mod_perl/ Template
Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Forwarded for anyone currently searching for a job who doesn't mind
dodgy hotmail accounts]
Can anyone say perfect job?
No. The rate's terrible. And I mean *really* terrible.
--
Piers
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 08:54:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Forwarded for anyone currently searching for a job who doesn't mind
dodgy hotmail accounts]
Can anyone say perfect job?
No. The rate's terrible. And I mean *really* terrible.
Paul Makepeace [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 08:54:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Forwarded for anyone currently searching for a job who doesn't mind
dodgy hotmail accounts]
Can anyone say perfect job?
No. The
No. The rate's terrible. And I mean *really* terrible.
That's what I was thinking. They're paying bad salary rates but for a
contract-length period.
Hell yes.
£2033 after tax per month for three months. Some people would love to be
earning that much lately (i.e. better than £0 per
Matthew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What makes it worse is that some user on a slow connection on the other side
of the world can effectively block the entire server while it 'slowly' sends
and receives data.
Which is why you never, _ever_ do that. you put a lite apache or squid
on
Alex McLintock wrote:
In theory this is ok - Apache and mod_perl should run ok on Windows 2000
shouldn't it?
I run Apache 1.3.22 / mod_perl 1.26 on a 2000 box for development purposes
only, and it works fine ... for a single client, that is ...
Unfortunately when even ultra simple cgi scripts
mod_perl doesn't run multi-threaded. You can only ever run one mod_perl
process on windows which means all mod_perl calls have to be serialised.
This really kills performance.
Arg. Is perl threadsafe? I'm sure I read somewhere either that it wasn't
or else that 90% of CPAN wasn't
Alex,
You best bet is probably FastCGI; you should then be able to set up a
number of back-end FastCGI processes serving pages.
Converting mod_perl CGI scripts to FastCGI is pretty easy, as long as you
stayed away from the Apache API. See the man page for CGI::Fast for an
example, or http
Jonathan Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the way Apache is going, I'd have thought dealing with threading
would be quite a priority for mod_perl, no?
Look out for it in mod_perl 2.0, so I've heard. It will keep a pool of
interpreter threads for creating dynamic pages.
--
Sam
Hi folks,
I've been contacted about a site which is an Apache/mod_perl website. The
problem
is that the live production server is Windows 2000 and not negotiable :-(
In theory this is ok - Apache and mod_perl should run ok on Windows 2000
shouldn't it?
Unfortunately when even ultra simple
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Alex McLintock wrote:
Hi folks,
I've been contacted about a site which is an Apache/mod_perl website. The
problem
is that the live production server is Windows 2000 and not negotiable :-(
In theory this is ok - Apache and mod_perl should run ok on Windows 2000
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Alex McLintock wrote:
I've been contacted about a site which is an Apache/mod_perl website.
The problem is that the live production server is Windows 2000 and not
negotiable :-(
In theory this is ok - Apache and mod_perl should run ok on Windows 2000
shouldn't
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 10:33:37PM +, Alex McLintock wrote:
I've been contacted about a site which is an Apache/mod_perl website.
The problem is that the live production server is Windows 2000 and not
negotiable :-(
Put linux inside a virtual machine (e.g. vmware) with port 80 exposed. I
Simon Wilcox wrote on Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:12 AM
Apache runs as a multi-threaded process under windows, not the *nix multi
process model.
mod_perl doesn't run multi-threaded. You can only ever run one mod_perl
process on windows which means all mod_perl calls have to be serialised
* Jonathan Peterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Tony Bowden wrote:
I can understand that in terms of adding more skills, but adding length
of experience is strange. What would someone with 6 years experience
have over someone with 5? Or 4?
Funnily enough I think experience counts for
Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This employer has aimed high with 6 years experience, however I am
sure they are not going to turn away someone with 4 or 5 years of
really good experience.
You just have no idea, do you?
--
David Hodgkinson, Wizard for Hire
* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This employer has aimed high with 6 years experience, however I am
sure they are not going to turn away someone with 4 or 5 years of
really good experience.
You just have no idea, do you?
It's ok
Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This employer has aimed high with 6 years experience, however I am
sure they are not going to turn away someone with 4 or 5 years of
really good
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 09:41:01AM +, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Funnily enough I think experience counts for a lot in computer jobs.
It depends on what that experience is. And I'm not convinced that after
a couple of years, just having experience of a certain thing is that
relevant. To pick
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:53:57PM +, Tony Bowden wrote:
Then ask for for experience in those things specifically. Not for
something as bland as years experience in the industry.
Because it would be quite truthful to say that you had N years experience
whilst conveniently editing the fact
Jon Nangle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave == Dave Hodgkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave You said:
I am sure they are not going to turn away someone with 4 or
5 years of really good experience.
Dave The FACT is that they have, so you are patently wrong.
* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What Greg said! Read what he wrote...he said they're not going to turn
someone down with the experience. They have, at _least_ twice, maybe
more.
if i wanted to express my opinion more formally, i might of stated it
along the lines of ...
Greg == Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greg more anecdotally, you could have 7 years of excellent experience
Greg and get turned down because you decided to masturbate during the
Greg interview - i know this has lost me a few interviews over the
Greg years ;-)
Exactly
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:17:57PM +, Steve Mynott wrote:
The position is likely to remain unfilled (does anyone know how long
its been advertised?)
I first heard about it last June, though that was in a slightly
different form.
Roger
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 10:29:39PM +, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
People were advertising for two years of Java experience in 1995 as well
...
It was showing up on CVs, too.
Though my personal favourite was the company that mistyped its ad, so
that it ended up asking for COBOC programmers. Sure
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Roger Burton West wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 10:29:39PM +, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
People were advertising for two years of Java experience in 1995 as well
...
It was showing up on CVs, too.
Though my personal favourite was the company that mistyped its ad, so
* Roger Burton West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
that it ended up asking for COBOC programmers. Sure enough, a goodly
percentage of the CVs offered many years' experience at COBOC...
I once had an argument with someone claiming they were being taught C+
at Uni (well it was actually a jumped up
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:38:43AM +, Steve Campbell wrote:
6 or more years in the internet industry??
Definitely not impossible, as I've been beneficially employed by the
Internet since '95, but it's just quite am impressive thing to
require...
You guys confusing the WWW for
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:00:35AM -0500, Andy Williams wrote:
Role: SOFTWARE DEVELOPER / MOD_PERL / LINUX / MYSQL
Skills required: ...
6+ years experience as a software developer in the internet industry.
6 or more years in the internet industry??
Tony
* at 04/01 12:55 + Tony Bowden said:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:00:35AM -0500, Andy Williams wrote:
Role: SOFTWARE DEVELOPER / MOD_PERL / LINUX / MYSQL
Skills required: ...
6+ years experience as a software developer in the internet industry.
6 or more years in the internet
Ivor == Ivor Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ivor Skills required: Degree with 6+ years experience as a software developer
Ivor in the internet industry. At least 4 years must be with Linux, Apache,
Ivor Perl (must be primarily mod_perl), MySql, and XML.
4 years with mod_perl and XML
Struan Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* at 04/01 12:55 + Tony Bowden said:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:00:35AM -0500, Andy Williams wrote:
Role: SOFTWARE DEVELOPER / MOD_PERL / LINUX / MYSQL
Skills required: ...
6+ years experience as a software developer in the internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:
Ivor == Ivor Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ivor Skills required: Degree with 6+ years experience as a software developer
Ivor in the internet industry. At least 4 years must be with Linux, Apache,
Ivor Perl (must be primarily mod_perl
On 4 Jan 2002, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:
Ivor Skills required: Degree with 6+ years experience as a software developer
Ivor in the internet industry. At least 4 years must be with Linux, Apache,
Ivor Perl (must be primarily mod_perl), MySql
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Ivor == Ivor Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ivor Skills required: Degree with 6+ years experience as a software developer
Ivor in the internet industry. At least 4 years must be with Linux, Apache,
Ivor Perl (must be primarily mod_perl), MySql, and XML
Andy williams wrote:
I just spoke to the agent, and he claims that the company are being really
insistent on the experience
I don't think they are paying too much either...
Oh and his email address appears to be wrong :)
A case of www.avatingpork.com methinks
Ivor.
* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There's quite a few people hereabouts who have interviewed for this
one and given the spread and style of us all NONE got an offer, I
don't think the person exists who would get the job.
tongue_in_cheek,_and_lots_of_smileys
Well, I haven't
Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There's quite a few people hereabouts who have interviewed for this
one and given the spread and style of us all NONE got an offer, I
don't think the person exists who would get the job.
, Apache,
Ivor Perl (must be primarily mod_perl), MySql, and XML.
4 years with mod_perl and XML
Not even Doug MacEachern or Tim Bray would qualify!
Only the XML bit though?
I dug through email archives a couple of weeks back (mainly to find out *when*
my first message to p5p
Tony Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 01:10:28PM +, Struan Donald wrote:
6 or more years in the internet industry??
well amazon started hiring in '94 so it's certainly possible.
improbable but not impossible :)
Definitely not impossible, as I've been
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:17:57PM +, Steve Mynott wrote:
I really can't see any reason at all why it would be a requirement.
My guess is the potential employer was stung by a poor previous
employee who promised much and delivered little and they reacted by
overspecing the requirements
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
