Paul == Paul A Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul The new interface looks nice, but at my age adaptation takes
Paul time. (You can in fact teach an old dog new tricks, but
Paul typically a rolled-up newspaper is involved.)
Note that you can revert to the old interface by selecting classic
in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Paul == Paul A Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul The new interface looks nice, but at my age adaptation takes
Paul time. (You can in fact teach an old dog new tricks, but
Paul typically a rolled-up newspaper is involved.)
Note that you can revert to the old
It doesn't look like the problem with Aspell binaries is going to be
solved before the release of LyX 1.4.0 for Windows, so here are the
installer scripts that provide all files for applications like LyX that
are statically linked to Aspell.
Note that the new aspell_dict script requires one
> "Paul" == Paul A Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> The new interface looks nice, but at my age adaptation takes
Paul> time. (You can in fact teach an old dog new tricks, but
Paul> typically a rolled-up newspaper is involved.)
Note that you can revert to the old interface by
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Paul" == Paul A Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> The new interface looks nice, but at my age adaptation takes
Paul> time. (You can in fact teach an old dog new tricks, but
Paul> typically a rolled-up newspaper is involved.)
Note that you can revert to the
It doesn't look like the problem with Aspell binaries is going to be
solved before the release of LyX 1.4.0 for Windows, so here are the
installer scripts that provide all files for applications like LyX that
are statically linked to Aspell.
Note that the new aspell_dict script requires one
Using the latest CVS version of Aspell should improve the situation.
However, I cannot get it to compile. Msybe you can have a look at it?
Joost
Using the latest CVS version of Aspell should improve the situation.
However, I cannot get it to compile. Msybe you can have a look at it?
Joost
Joost Verburg wrote:
Thanks for building all 80 Aspell dictionary installers, but it was
maybe a better idea to test one first (as I said in my previous post the
installer script was untested).
When testing your installers I noticed that the uninstaller user
interface is broken, this should
Stephen Harris wrote:
I'll have a go at the installation with a newly minted dict.
The installer offered the correct default folder for installation.
However, I encountered the same problem as before, there
are missing files. The spellchecker could not be started,
the file
Angus Leeming wrote:
Thanks for this report, Stephen. Joost are you reading?
These data files are indeed also required. It looks like we have to
create an installer for Aspell itself as well.
Joost
Joost Verburg wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Thanks for this report, Stephen. Joost are you reading?
These data files are indeed also required. It looks like we have to
create an installer for Aspell itself as well.
I see an installer at http://aspell.net/win32 for aspell 0.5. Can you reuse
Angus Leeming wrote:
I see an installer at http://aspell.net/win32 for aspell 0.5. Can you
reuse that or would it be easier to start afresh with NSIS?
I wrote an installer for Aspell 0.6 and an updated dictionary installer.
However, things seem to be a little more difficult.
The
Joost Verburg wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I see an installer at http://aspell.net/win32 for aspell 0.5. Can you
reuse that or would it be easier to start afresh with NSIS?
I wrote an installer for Aspell 0.6 and an updated dictionary installer.
However, things seem to be a little more
Joost Verburg wrote:
Thanks for building all 80 Aspell dictionary installers, but it was
maybe a better idea to test one first (as I said in my previous post the
installer script was untested).
When testing your installers I noticed that the uninstaller user
interface is broken, this should
Stephen Harris wrote:
I'll have a go at the installation with a newly minted dict.
The installer offered the correct default folder for installation.
However, I encountered the same problem as before, there
are missing files. "The spellchecker could not be started,
the file
Angus Leeming wrote:
Thanks for this report, Stephen. Joost are you reading?
These data files are indeed also required. It looks like we have to
create an installer for Aspell itself as well.
Joost
Joost Verburg wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Thanks for this report, Stephen. Joost are you reading?
These data files are indeed also required. It looks like we have to
create an installer for Aspell itself as well.
I see an installer at http://aspell.net/win32 for aspell 0.5. Can you reuse
Angus Leeming wrote:
I see an installer at http://aspell.net/win32 for aspell 0.5. Can you
reuse that or would it be easier to start afresh with NSIS?
I wrote an installer for Aspell 0.6 and an updated dictionary installer.
However, things seem to be a little more difficult.
The
Joost Verburg wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I see an installer at http://aspell.net/win32 for aspell 0.5. Can you
reuse that or would it be easier to start afresh with NSIS?
I wrote an installer for Aspell 0.6 and an updated dictionary installer.
However, things seem to be a little more
Angus Leeming wrote:
We don't use aspell.exe. We link aspell.lib statically into lyx.exe. It's
perfectly possible to install (and use) the dictionaries without installing
aspell.exe.
Then I don't really understand why Windows users should install their
dictionaries in
Joost Verburg wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
We don't use aspell.exe. We link aspell.lib statically into
lyx.exe. It's perfectly possible to install (and use) the
dictionaries without installing aspell.exe.
Then I don't really understand why Windows users should
install their dictionaries in
Angus Leeming wrote:
I think that the Aspell dictionaries aren't our business. We shouldn't
package them with LyX. Uwe can throw them into his installer if he likes
(it's his installer after all :)) but LyX itself shouldn't have to look
for these dictionaries in a hard-wired location. The
Joost Verburg wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I think that the Aspell dictionaries aren't our business. We shouldn't
package them with LyX. Uwe can throw them into his installer if he likes
(it's his installer after all :)) but LyX itself shouldn't have to look
for these dictionaries in a
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I'm still mulling over what to do with aspell.
FWIW, I installed 1.4.0pre2. Installation was smooth, and the
configuration script ran when it was supposed to (unlike with 1.37).
File-Import lists three options, including LaTeX, so that's fixed.
Angus Leeming wrote:
So you're not interested in fixing things? I guess I misunderstood you.
I mean that there is no point in a workaround (putting dictionaries in
the LyX directory) if it's not easier than a good solution (making it a
configuration option).
Angus wrote:
Hi, Paul. Hi, Stephen.
Does it really bomb or are you just missing a dictionary? If so, try
grabbing one from http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/Aspell6
-
SH: The problem I experienced was that C:\Aspell\lib\aspell-0.60
was not created
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: LyX/Win 1.4.0
Angus wrote:
Hi, Paul. Hi, Stephen.
Does it really bomb or are you just missing a dictionary
Angus Leeming wrote:
We don't use aspell.exe. We link aspell.lib statically into lyx.exe. It's
perfectly possible to install (and use) the dictionaries without installing
aspell.exe.
Then I don't really understand why Windows users should install their
dictionaries in
Joost Verburg wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> We don't use aspell.exe. We link aspell.lib statically into
>> lyx.exe. It's perfectly possible to install (and use) the
>> dictionaries without installing aspell.exe.
> Then I don't really understand why Windows users should
> install their
Angus Leeming wrote:
I think that the Aspell dictionaries aren't our business. We shouldn't
package them with LyX. Uwe can throw them into his installer if he likes
(it's his installer after all :)) but LyX itself shouldn't have to look
for these dictionaries in a hard-wired location. The
Joost Verburg wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> I think that the Aspell dictionaries aren't our business. We shouldn't
>> package them with LyX. Uwe can throw them into his installer if he likes
>> (it's his installer after all :)) but LyX itself shouldn't have to look
>> for these dictionaries in
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> I'm still mulling over what to do with aspell.
> FWIW, I installed 1.4.0pre2. Installation was smooth, and the
> configuration script ran when it was supposed to (unlike with 1.37).
> File->Import lists three options, including LaTeX, so that's
Angus Leeming wrote:
So you're not interested in fixing things? I guess I misunderstood you.
I mean that there is no point in a workaround (putting dictionaries in
the LyX directory) if it's not easier than a good solution (making it a
configuration option).
>
Angus wrote:
Hi, Paul. Hi, Stephen.
Does it really "bomb" or are you just missing a dictionary? If so, try
grabbing one from http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/Aspell6
-
SH: The problem I experienced was that C:\Aspell\lib\aspell-0.60>
was not
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: LyX/Win 1.4.0
Angus wrote:
Hi, Paul. Hi, Stephen.
Does it
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I'm still mulling over what to do with aspell. If we go for aspell 0.6
then it looks like I'll have to supply the dictionaries too. Would make
Kevin Atkinson happy :)
I just tested the new Aspell. Version
Angus wrote:
Hi, Stephen.
This problem with the path_prefix stuff should now be fixed. Perhaps you'd
like to test it out?
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX137/lyx-1.3.7_win32_setup_v4.exe
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX140pre/lyx-1.4.0pre_win32_setup_v2.exe
I'm still mulling
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Angus,
I can confirm that on my side. I have always compiled 1.4cvs with aspell
0.6 and it worked fine so far. I confirm also Joost experience with the
compilation of the dictionaries.
Hi, Abdel.
That's great news.
However, before we
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This problem with the path_prefix stuff should now be fixed.
I think that might be 137_v3. Both of these files installed splendidly.
No more sh configure; I hope no improvements needed to be sacrificed.
Great!
The dictionary doesn't seem too hard to
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Angus,
I can confirm that on my side. I have always compiled 1.4cvs with aspell
0.6 and it worked fine so far. I confirm also Joost experience with the
compilation of the dictionaries.
Hi, Abdel.
That's great news.
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, before we release either flavour of LyX/Win compiled with
aspell 0.6 to the wider world, we should ensure that people have
access to the dictionaries. I.e., replace the dictionaries at
http://aspell.net/win32/ with their 0.6 equivalent.
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, before we release either flavour of LyX/Win compiled with
aspell 0.6 to the wider world, we should ensure that people have
access to the dictionaries. I.e., replace the dictionaries at
http://aspell.net/win32/ with
Angus Leeming wrote:
I'm not sure about concurrent LyX137 and LyX140 spellchecking
without alternating or changing the name of the folder called C:\Aspell
What is the reason of this hardcoded path? Although C is a common drive
letter, there are systems that do not use it or where people do
Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I'm not sure about concurrent LyX137 and LyX140 spellchecking
without alternating or changing the name of the folder called C:\Aspell
What is the reason of this hardcoded path? Although C is a common drive
letter, there are
Angus Leeming wrote:
IIRC, it was a question of priorities. The path was hard-coded in Ruurd's
original port and when I integrated his work into the official LyX sources I
just used his code. It is certainly possible to set this path dynamically; we'd
have an entry in lyxrc.defaults/preferences
Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When LyX looks for sh, convert or other applications, it just looks
inside the PATH environment variable.
Having set the PATH environment variable as appropriate, using the contents of
the \path_prefix entry from lyxrc.defaults/preferences...
That
Angus Leeming wrote:
shrugTry it out and supply me with the details of what you did and I'll write
you a shell script to automate the process/shrug
My idea is:
PART 1 (SHELL SCRIPT)
-
* Extract the dictionary (say, aspell6-en-6.0-0.tar.bz2) in a separate
directory (for
Angus Leeming wrote:
Hi, Stephen.
This problem with the path_prefix stuff should now be fixed. Perhaps
you'd like to test it out?
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX137/lyx-1.3.7_win32_setup_v4.exe
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX140pre/lyx-1.4.0pre_win32_setup_v2.exe
I'm
Joost Verburg wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
shrugTry it out and supply me with the details of what you did and
I'll write you a shell script to automate the process/shrug
My idea is:
PART 1 (SHELL SCRIPT)
[snip instructions...]
Now you end up with a large set of zip files in your output
Angus Leeming wrote:
Can't you script this step? If you can, then tell me how and I'll add it
to the script. Unless, of course, you take this and run with it...
Since your shell script already extracts the language code, it's indeed
a lot easier to script everything.
Attached you'll find
Joost Verburg wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
shrugTry it out and supply me with the details of what you did and
I'll write you a shell script to automate the process/shrug
My idea is:
PART 1 (SHELL SCRIPT)
[snip instructions...]
Now you end up with a large set of zip files in your output
Stephen Harris wrote:
SH: I this packaging scheme adaptable?
The dict files went to C:\Aspell\data
Regards,
Stephen
You really don't want to package 80 languages manually. Using Angus'
shell script and my installer script all dictionaries will be
downloaded, compiled and packaged with an
Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Can't you script this step? If you can, then tell me how and I'll add it
to the script. Unless, of course, you take this and run with it...
Since your shell script already extracts the language code, it's indeed
a lot easier
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SH: I this packaging scheme adaptable?
I don't think that it's any better than the 'official' aspell 0.5 installer at
http://aspell.net/win32/files/testing/dictgen/setup.iss.in
The dict files went to C:\Aspell\data
That's no longer the case for aspell
Angus Leeming wrote:
Just thoughts, but I'm sure that they would be things that Kevin Atkinson would
raise. (The plan is to submit this stuff to Kevin, right?)
First of all they should be somewhere when LyX 1.4.0 is released. If you
want to submit them for the official site that's fine.
Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
About dictionary uninstall:
In order to be able to uninstall a dictionary, you'll need to keep track
of all filenames of that dictionary. If your shell script can write some
temporary file that contains:
${COMMAND} ${DIRECTORY}dicfile1
${COMMAND}
Angus Leeming wrote:
Just to be certain I understand, given a directory, so: (..)
Right? If that's the case then the command below would look in directory 'de'
and output a file 'ls_de' containing all the files in 'de':
ls de | sed 's/^/${COMMAND} ${DIRECTORY}/;s/$//' ls_de
Exactly what I
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SH: I this packaging scheme adaptable?
Angus: I don't think that it's any better than the 'official' aspell 0.5
installer at http://aspell.net/win32/files/testing/dictgen/setup.iss.in
SH: The dict files went to C:\Aspell\data
Angus: That's no
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I'm still mulling over what to do with aspell. If we go for aspell 0.6
then it looks like I'll have to supply the dictionaries too. Would make
Kevin Atkinson happy :)
I just tested the new Aspell. Version
Angus wrote:
Hi, Stephen.
This problem with the path_prefix stuff should now be fixed. Perhaps you'd
like to test it out?
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX137/lyx-1.3.7_win32_setup_v4.exe
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX140pre/lyx-1.4.0pre_win32_setup_v2.exe
I'm still mulling
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Angus,
> I can confirm that on my side. I have always compiled 1.4cvs with aspell
> 0.6 and it worked fine so far. I confirm also Joost experience with the
> compilation of the dictionaries.
Hi, Abdel.
That's great news.
However, before we
Stephen Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This problem with the path_prefix stuff should now be fixed.
> I think that might be 137_v3. Both of these files installed splendidly.
> No more sh configure; I hope no improvements needed to be sacrificed.
Great!
> The dictionary doesn't seem too
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello Angus,
I can confirm that on my side. I have always compiled 1.4cvs with aspell
0.6 and it worked fine so far. I confirm also Joost experience with the
compilation of the dictionaries.
Hi, Abdel.
That's great news.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, before we release either flavour of LyX/Win compiled with
> > aspell 0.6 to the wider world, we should ensure that people have
> > access to the dictionaries. I.e., replace the dictionaries at
> > http://aspell.net/win32/ with their 0.6
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
However, before we release either flavour of LyX/Win compiled with
aspell 0.6 to the wider world, we should ensure that people have
access to the dictionaries. I.e., replace the dictionaries at
http://aspell.net/win32/ with
Angus Leeming wrote:
I'm not sure about concurrent LyX137 and LyX140 spellchecking
without alternating or changing the name of the folder called C:\Aspell
What is the reason of this hardcoded path? Although C is a common drive
letter, there are systems that do not use it or where people do
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I'm not sure about concurrent LyX137 and LyX140 spellchecking
> > without alternating or changing the name of the folder called C:\Aspell
>
> What is the reason of this hardcoded path? Although C is a common drive
> letter,
Angus Leeming wrote:
IIRC, it was a question of priorities. The path was hard-coded in Ruurd's
original port and when I integrated his work into the official LyX sources I
just used his code. It is certainly possible to set this path dynamically; we'd
have an entry in lyxrc.defaults/preferences
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When LyX looks for sh, convert or other applications, it just looks
> inside the PATH environment variable.
Having set the PATH environment variable as appropriate, using the contents of
the \path_prefix entry from lyxrc.defaults/preferences...
>
Angus Leeming wrote:
Try it out and supply me with the details of what you did and I'll write
you a shell script to automate the process
My idea is:
PART 1 (SHELL SCRIPT)
-
* Extract the dictionary (say, aspell6-en-6.0-0.tar.bz2) in a separate
directory (for example,
Angus Leeming wrote:
Hi, Stephen.
This problem with the path_prefix stuff should now be fixed. Perhaps
you'd like to test it out?
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX137/lyx-1.3.7_win32_setup_v4.exe
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX140pre/lyx-1.4.0pre_win32_setup_v2.exe
I'm
Joost Verburg wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Try it out and supply me with the details of what you did and
I'll write you a shell script to automate the process
My idea is:
PART 1 (SHELL SCRIPT)
[snip instructions...]
Now you end up with a large set of zip files in your output directory.
Angus Leeming wrote:
Can't you script this step? If you can, then tell me how and I'll add it
to the script. Unless, of course, you take this and run with it...
Since your shell script already extracts the language code, it's indeed
a lot easier to script everything.
Attached you'll find
Joost Verburg wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Try it out and supply me with the details of what you did and
I'll write you a shell script to automate the process
My idea is:
PART 1 (SHELL SCRIPT)
[snip instructions...]
Now you end up with a large set of zip files in your output directory.
Stephen Harris wrote:
SH: I this packaging scheme adaptable?
The dict files went to C:\Aspell\data
Regards,
Stephen
You really don't want to package 80 languages manually. Using Angus'
shell script and my installer script all dictionaries will be
downloaded, compiled and packaged with an
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Can't you script this step? If you can, then tell me how and I'll add it
> > to the script. Unless, of course, you take this and run with it...
>
> Since your shell script already extracts the language code, it's indeed
> a
Stephen Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SH: I this packaging scheme adaptable?
I don't think that it's any better than the 'official' aspell 0.5 installer at
http://aspell.net/win32/files/testing/dictgen/setup.iss.in
> The dict files went to C:\Aspell\data
That's no longer the case for
Angus Leeming wrote:
Just thoughts, but I'm sure that they would be things that Kevin Atkinson would
raise. (The plan is to submit this stuff to Kevin, right?)
First of all they should be somewhere when LyX 1.4.0 is released. If you
want to submit them for the official site that's fine.
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> About dictionary uninstall:
> In order to be able to uninstall a dictionary, you'll need to keep track
> of all filenames of that dictionary. If your shell script can write some
> temporary file that contains:
> ${COMMAND} "${DIRECTORY}dicfile1"
>
Angus Leeming wrote:
Just to be certain I understand, given a directory, so: (..)
Right? If that's the case then the command below would look in directory 'de'
and output a file 'ls_de' containing all the files in 'de':
ls de | sed 's/^/${COMMAND} "${DIRECTORY}/;s/$/"/' > ls_de
Exactly what I
Stephen Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SH: I this packaging scheme adaptable?
Angus: I don't think that it's any better than the 'official' aspell 0.5
installer at http://aspell.net/win32/files/testing/dictgen/setup.iss.in
SH: The dict files went to C:\Aspell\data
Angus: That's no
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Grab it from:
| http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX140pre/lyx-1.4.0pre_win32_setup_v1.exe
|
| I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
| version since the installer code is little different to the previous
| version. (The
Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
| version since the installer code is little different to the previous
| version. (The one real change being that I've removed all tests for
| Perl in the installer.)
Does
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus wrote:
I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
version since the installer code is little different to the previous
version. (The one real change being that I've removed all tests for
Perl in the installer.)
I
Angus Leeming wrote:
Grab it from:
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX140pre/lyx-1.4.0pre_win32_setup_v1.exe
I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
version since the installer code is little different to the previous
version. (The one real change being that
Stephen Harris wrote:
Angus wrote:
I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
version since the installer code is little different to the previous
version. (The one real change being that I've removed all tests for Perl
in the installer.)
Angus Leeming wrote:
I'm still mulling over what to do with aspell. If we go for aspell 0.6
then it looks like I'll have to supply the dictionaries too. Would make
Kevin Atkinson happy :)
I just tested the new Aspell. Version 0.6 works fine and more recent
dictionaries are available compared
Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I'm still mulling over what to do with aspell. If we go for aspell 0.6
then it looks like I'll have to supply the dictionaries too. Would make
Kevin Atkinson happy :)
I just tested the new Aspell. Version 0.6 works fine and
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Grab it from:
| http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX140pre/lyx-1.4.0pre_win32_setup_v1.exe
|
| I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
| version since the installer code is little different to the previous
| version.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
> | version since the installer code is little different to the previous
> | version. (The one real change being that I've removed all tests for
> | Perl in the installer.)
>
Stephen Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Angus wrote:
> I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
> version since the installer code is little different to the previous
> version. (The one real change being that I've removed all tests for
> Perl in the installer.)
Angus Leeming wrote:
Grab it from:
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX140pre/lyx-1.4.0pre_win32_setup_v1.exe
I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
version since the installer code is little different to the previous
version. (The one real change being that
Stephen Harris wrote:
Angus wrote:
I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
version since the installer code is little different to the previous
version. (The one real change being that I've removed all tests for Perl
in the installer.)
Angus Leeming wrote:
I'm still mulling over what to do with aspell. If we go for aspell 0.6
then it looks like I'll have to supply the dictionaries too. Would make
Kevin Atkinson happy :)
I just tested the new Aspell. Version 0.6 works fine and more recent
dictionaries are available compared
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I'm still mulling over what to do with aspell. If we go for aspell 0.6
> > then it looks like I'll have to supply the dictionaries too. Would make
> > Kevin Atkinson happy :)
> I just tested the new Aspell. Version 0.6 works
Grab it from:
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX140pre/lyx-1.4.0pre_win32_setup_v1.exe
I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
version since the installer code is little different to the previous
version. (The one real change being that I've removed all tests
Angus wrote:
I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
version since the installer code is little different to the previous
version. (The one real change being that I've removed all tests for
Perl in the installer.)
Grab it from:
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX140pre/lyx-1.4.0pre_win32_setup_v1.exe
I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
version since the installer code is little different to the previous
version. (The one real change being that I've removed all tests
Angus wrote:
I anticipate that the installer will have the same bugs as the 1.3.x
version since the installer code is little different to the previous
version. (The one real change being that I've removed all tests for
Perl in the installer.)
100 matches
Mail list logo
