On 2024-08-28 13:45, Edwardo Garcia via mailop wrote:
nobody is unblockable - we have blocked gmail before, and will do it again
if need arise, we are only small in hosting side of business, and our cable
and dsl base is also small with customer numbers in 7 figures range, maybe
our rejecting goo
There are many trusted (android) app stores (f-droid for one).
TL,DR;
If you activate your android w/o a gmail account. You will need to find
a different means of backup, and use different app stores (which also
provide apps to replace Gdrive for phone/account recovery).
HTH
--
On 2024-08-26 22:26, Viktor Dukhovni via mailop wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 06:18:01AM +0200, Bryan Holloway via mailop wrote:
The password is correct, but it insists on verification from this user's no
longer existing cellphone. Yet the back-up account exists. For some reason
gmail refuses
ge config, but now I think there's
better ways to get most of the same stuff done with milters, policy
maps, etc.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
input, do any processing/modifications you need to do, then seal on
output (and not change the message from that point).
Am I misunderstanding, or is this a bug on MS's end? If it's a bug...
any ideas on how to get that through to the right people at MS? I'm
guessing front-line support is
ng on the host OS (I routinely use it remotely, from my
> desktop Linux PC which has a full X desktop running).
Cockpit can provide some basic KVM/libvirt VM management (including
graphical and serial consoles) in a web browser.
--
Chris Adams
___
mai
I also get money transfer notifications
from one bank; they have the typical "only for intended recipient,
notify sender if you aren't" disclaimer... along with the "this is sent
from noreply, do not reply" bit (so there's no way to satis
e tagged enough as spam that Gmail sends them directly to the spam
folder now, hopefully it's dropping the reputation of the sender too
(IPs, domains, etc.) for repeatedly sending such junk.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
th VMs that include a /64. So that's not a good
excuse either.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
artificial limitation; proper network support should not be an
up-sell.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
is actually being transmitted via SMTP, the sender changes
it to:
..example.com
and then the receiver strips the leading dot to make it:
.example.com
as originally written.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
madams.net Submitter:gosecure.net
Report-ID:3E142D0B10BBC11A97A7146A82662F23
I realized I was blocking reports as spam because of the various errors.
Oops.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Once upon a time, Jaroslaw Rafa said:
> Dnia 25.08.2023 o godz. 09:48:35 Chris Adams via mailop pisze:
> >
> > So even for transactional messages, there's usually an account making
> > the purchase, or something is being delivered to an address, or the
> > l
nt transaction to this address and (b)
don't send any mail for future transactions with the same delivery to
the same address without further input. Future orders that would have
transactional emails blocked should pop up and say "hey, this address is
flagg
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 18:43, Michael Grant via mailop
wrote:
> > (You could also try to reset the password, often sent to the registered
> > email address.)
>
> I have this issue with my gmail account. I get literally a TON of
> crap for other people who think they have my gmail account.
> Unfo
(so I'm getting the
family member messages - no Delta account to log in to).
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
t least signal somebody that "something is
wrong"), but everything else should follow at minimum an opt-out system,
if not opt-in.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
ssages and the only one
that can make them stop.
A few vendors manage to put a "this is not me" link in messages (which
is functionally an unsubscribe, even if you don't want to call it that).
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@
), so I know instantly that this is not to me.
Why do vendors think they don't need an unsubscribe in this type of
mail? Just because their customers are dumb and don't know their own
email address doesn't mean they should continue sending personal
information about them to other pe
Once upon a time, Sean Kamath said:
> That’s how I learned BSD4.3’s csh had a fun history expression “bug” (it
> caused csh to coredump):
Yeah well, csh considered harmful. :)
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
vance,
Chris Truitt
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
n protocols for
email, that's a funny hill to die on. The RFC defines the response
format, which doesn't have to be a text file on a POSIX system at all
(could be generated on the fly, could be on a non-POSIX system).
--
Chris Adams
___
m
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 13:19, Atro Tossavainen via mailop
wrote:
> > Neither do I. The response simply describes what is happening. When a
> > third party X complains that Hetzner customer Y is a spammer, I consider
> > it only appropriate that Hetzner passes the complaint along and asks Y
> > for
iko Schlittermann via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Chris Huff via mailop (Fr 27 Jan 2023 22:52:39 CET):
>> I see that a fair number of us wanted help from someone at freenet.de last
> …
>> email won't be accepted anymore and I wanted to at least understand more if
&g
Hello,
I see that a fair number of us wanted help from someone at freenet.de last
year. Now it's my turn. If anyone here either works for or knows the best
path to writing to someone at freenet.de I would appreciate it. We have a
customer who has been told a couple of different reasons as to why t
Yep this is intentional to coerce into pay to play
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023, 10:07 AM Osborne, Richard via mailop
wrote:
> We have been seeing this also for about the last week. Our Verizon reps
> are telling us we need to pay for their EMAG (Enterprise Messaging) service
> to not get blocked.
>
>
>
Came here to say what Matt - who as far as I can tell is always right - has
said: please send anything related to email compliance at Marketo to
ab...@marketo.com and we'll handle it with our customer.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 7:58 AM Matt Vernhout via mailop
wrote:
> CAN-SPAM, CASL and several ot
it. Gmail tried to forward it, but my server's spam filters rejected
the message (reject during SMTP, no bounce generated from my server).
Gmail generated a delivery status notification message... and sent that
directly to the Gmail spam folder.
Oops... :)
rt,
though no business SLAs and occasionally if a severe issue affects you with
many customers, it can take a little while to resolve. This has been
vanishingly rare in the 10+ years I've been a customer. They did recently
migrate my entire web and email hosting after a networking/cluster
nd most. And even the
density of capabale people is way to low to support friends-and-family.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022, 00:25 Dave Lugo via mailop, wrote:
> My fiance's FB account was hijacked by a bad actor today. The bad actor
> changed the email address on the account, and despite multiple attempts to
> recover the account using SMS, the SMS texts don't arrive (dunno if
> her carrier veri
Once upon a time, Ángel said:
> On 2022-08-21 at 15:18 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Also, I believe you can offer both RSA and EC certs, so shouldn't be
> > a negative to getting an EC cert (you just need to have RSA too).
>
> How would you do that?
>
> You cou
Once upon a time, Slavko said:
> BTW, Chris, if ssl-enum-ciphers nmap's script was not updated recently
> (1-3 years -- i do not remember when exactly i tried it last), do not
> rely on it, it doesn't support TLS1.3...
The version included with nmap 7.92 does recognize an
sV --script /usr/share/nmap/scripts/ssl-enum-ciphers -p 25
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
Also, I believe you can offer both RSA and EC certs, so shouldn't be a
negative to getting an EC cert (you just need to have RSA too).
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
sl s_client and gnutls-cli make it
hard to replicate for testing. I will continue to look.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (rsa 2048) - A
So is there a bug on Google's side forcing SHA1, or am I missing
something (which is quite possible, getting into obscure bits of TLS
does trip me up)?
--
Chris Adams
_
rom: line (while recognizing the need to do the
rewrites), I have a script that recognizes a couple of rewrite methods
I've seen and reverses them for messages going into my mailing list
folders. It's very much just done based on what I've seen though, so
probably doesn't
On 2022-05-19 05:41, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:
Couldn't the Do Not Email Registry also be domain-based?...
It could. Rodney Joffe (if my memory serves me right), implemented that
very thing and offered it up for domain owners to use.
AOL and several other majors, including very
On 2022-05-13 12:57, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
I suspect that their $BLOCKING method has progressed to false positives
as a way to get email administrator's attention.
It's progressed to false positives because some people run mail servers
who aren't parsing DNSBL return codes right. The
The policy was implemented in March 2021 over a year ago.
The 127.255.255.254 is the return code, not the IP queried. From
https://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/807/using-our-public-mirrors-check-your-return-codes-now.
A reminder
As of March 2021, we will begin the implementation of the f
use afraid.org premium account for external DNS, keeping an eye
on any occasional changes they might make to hosting or mail infrastructure
(as they will sometimes update default records automatically on the
assumption you are hosting DNS for your domains on their NS). DH will still
notify in advance if critical things like MX or IMAP access is changing,
which itself is a rare occurrence. For most people Dreamhost's DNS
management panel will be more than adequate.
Protonmail also support inbound plus/sub-addressing as I believe does
Outlook/Hotmail.
Cheers
Chris
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 17:27, Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
> On 2022-03-03 at 10:17:11 UTC-0500 (Thu, 3 Mar 2022 07:17:11 -0800)
> Michael Peddemors via mailop
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > whois emailsvr.net
> > No match for domain "EMAILSVR.NET"
> >
> > Time to register a domain?
>
> No, beca
On 2022-02-28 10:06, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
It strikes me this is really a question you should be asking the bank.
It’s very likely that the bank did pass the address along, for whatever
reason, but they are the only group that’s going to be able to answer
“why did this check processin
Is there anybody from EarthLink who can contact me off-list?
We are seeing emails sent to EarthLink recipients have the From header
domain overwritten with the CNAME the domain points to and would like to
discuss.
Thanks.
~ Chris
___
mailop mailing list
On 2021-12-16 10:59 a.m., Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
Well, I'm sure this'll be a popular opinion, but I'm giving it anyway.
Maybe let's try not to do something that'll screw up that college
kid's life forever over their bit of stupidity. It's wrong, they
shouldn't be doing it, but it's not for
On 2021-12-15 10:53 a.m., Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
On 12/15/21 6:27 AM, Larry M. Smith via mailop wrote:
The list of domains being used appears to be here;
https://measurement.cs.princeton.edu/privacystudy/
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I feel like the student and the
professor
I'm pretty sure I've seen some negative scoring in for multiple Froms in
spamassassin both as multiple From: headers or just values.
I also think I saw it in Lyris Mailshield.
Multiple From: headers was(/is?) was relatively common in email spambots.
On 2021-12-13 12:19 p.m., Alessandro Vesely
Mailops, is the listing of myshopify.com on AbuseIPDB a cause for concern?
Many small firms use links to x.myshopify.com &
asking if the AbuseIPDB listing impacts on email delivery.
https://www.abuseipdb.com/check/myshopify.com
Thanks
Chris
https://sensorpr
The /128 issue with Linode (insofar as it relates to Spamhaus) has been
percolating for at least 5 years if I recall correctly, but no shorter
than the strong RFC-level guidelines of /64.
Linode will allocate at /64 on request, and has being doing so for about
just as long.
On 2021-11-25 2:
d) settings. IIRC
I've seen that behavior from some (but not all) Google Home products and
the Netflix app on various devices.
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
On 2021-11-10 9:58 p.m., Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
On 2021-11-10 11:47 a.m., Rob McEwen via mailop wrote:
Already, the source/git are in too many multiple places. Whatever
happened to giving back to opensource? I think you are building on
other's 'hard-earned expertise' as well.
On 2021-11-10 10:09 p.m., Collider via mailop wrote:
Wait - Spamhaus dnsd is in C++?
No.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
I've checked. The Spamhaus publicly distributed version of rbldnsd does
not support multiple DQS-style keys.
But, like any other DNS server, you *can* implement a single key by
putting your DNSBL zone under a name like ".example.com", and as
long as the mail servers that are supposed to *know
The spamhaus supported version of rbldnsd may understand the use of keys
in this fashion.
If an ordinary DNS server is configured correctly, it should return
NXDOMAIN for those who don't know the key (the DNS server is SOA'd to
the base name, not the base+key. But this will be a problem if yo
Larry,
Thanks for pointing this out.
I manage Deliverability for WhatCounts and I'm in contact with the appropriate
parties to get this sorted out and fixed ASAP.
Thank you,
Chris Truitt
From: mailop on behalf of Larry M. Smith via mailop
Sent: S
Thanks Lili,
Replied off-list - I just hope it got there!
Regards,
Chris
On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 07:51 -0400, Lili Crowley via mailop wrote:
> Hi Chris-
>
> I can help. Please contact me off list.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 4:56 AM Chris Malton via mailop <
&g
e" providers (Gmail, Hotmail) - but are still struggling with
these two.
Thanks in advance for any assistance/pointers that can be given.
Regards,
Chris Malton
--
Delta V Technologies Limited
0 402 402www.deltav-tech.co.uk
Office: Unit J1, Daedalus Park, Daedalus Drive, Lee-on-t
tunnel and
need port 25 opened, please send an email to i...@he.net explaining your
situation. We will normally require completion of the Sage level of the
IPv6 certification prior to removing this filter.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Chris Malton
--
Delta V Technologies Limited
03
Wow. I’m used to weird text from some source being copied and pasted, and I’m
used to obvious phishing language, but I think this is the first time I’ve seen
both in one email. It’s very jarring.
> On Sep 11, 2021, at 8:23 PM, John R Levine via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Today's phish, sent directly
Not an FP, that IP has been caught attempting to break into POP accounts
on a trap server.
On 2021-08-31 10:52 a.m., Suresh Ramasubramanian via mailop wrote:
It is an xbl listing and that usually catches bot spam traffic. So
unless some botnet found a way to abuse farmed or infected gmail
acco
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 at 19:35, Ken Johnson via mailop
wrote:
> I recently needed to send a software key to a remote colleague who needed
> to
> reinstall some commercial software after re-installing Windows. However,
> after the key failed to authorize, an investigation determined that the key
> w
Someone inside web.de land got infected with a variant of Gamut spewing
bitcoin extortion scams, and for one reason or other, they routed thru
web.de's mail servers INSTEAD of going MX-direct (perhaps a port 25
redirector).
The raw emails have all the fingerprints of gamut, except that it went
There's also the notion of Canspam Act. Where *both* the notion of
spamming, and no unsubscribe options are illegal.
A few years ago, I constructed a complaint that resulted in a fairly
large company receiving a fine.
I've got lots of samples in domains defunct for 20+ years, and others
whe
On 2021-07-18 9:46 p.m., Patrick via mailop wrote:
Wow. A fake auth module would seem to invite spam storms. Which for some might
be handle-able and a good way to learn interactively with botnets?
Has anyone implemented such a thing? Thanks!
I've been doing it for at least 5 years. When a co
While I know that this is a different administration I’d still like to note
that when it was happening to non profits and hospitals this wasn’t the
response. But mess with our oil or beef? No, the U.S. will not abide by that!
> On Jun 4, 2021, at 1:26 PM, Kevin A. McGrail via mailop
> wrote:
>
Hi --
We are seeing some odd behavior with emails delivered to recipient
mailboxes protected by Carrierzone (https://carrierzone.com/).
Emails leaving our platform have a proper From header. However, when they
are received by Carrierzone, both the From and Return-Path headers have had
the domain
On 2021-05-01 3:34 a.m., Heiko Schlittermann via mailop wrote:
> I forgot the "selling point" that hooked me: The specification.
>
>http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/index.html
>
> It simply contains everything you need. But the reader has to
> understand, that setup/operat
Heh. You've never used Qpsmtpd or Haraka, I can tell. Haraka and
qpsmtpd are basically skeletons where you can insert plugins to
do/redefine anything you want pre/during/post any step of SMTP. Want to
extend/redefine SMTP? Sure. Parallelize queries to any kind of
database? Fine. Regexp subje
x27;t explain what's been
going on in their heads.
Cheers,
Hans-Martin
Am 30. April 2021 16:55:45 schrieb Chris Kolbenschlag via mailop
:
I got an email from a small receiver that they are blocking one of our /24s
because of spam. I looked up the email address they referenced and found
they block
the /24.
Any idea the thought process here?
Chris K
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
ur causes the MTA's, let alone the sysadmin's notice,
you've lost already.
At this point I can only suggest figuring out whether it's "just you" or
not, by trying to send someone there an email from somewhere completely
unrelated.
Then try to contact their sysadmin.
Aside from the possibility that the message is simply wrong, or the
implementation broken, is your mail server acting like most other
servers when presented with a failure (soft or hard)?
Your posting seems to be that you give up after the second try.
Most servers will try at least 5 times for su
On 2021-02-14 01:42, André Peters via mailop wrote:
Hi,
Have you guys already read this?
https://blog.sucuri.net/2021/02/uceprotect-when-rbls-go-bad.html
I have seen the discussion and found it fits. Will you remove UCL from
your servers?
I did a bit of research and there's a couple of thi
On 2021-02-08 21:09, Dave Warren via mailop wrote:
\
You could always turn on + addressing on M365...
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/recipients-in-exchange-online/plus-addressing-in-exchange-online
Admittedly it is fairly new, and opt-in for reasons described on the
link above, b
On 2021-02-02 12:12, John Levine wrote:
Me neither.
Wanna issue an addenda? ;-)
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
/8 or
thru 0/0?
If you got caught by spamcop returning random A records outside of 127/8
treated as positive (or indeed, any of the published return values), you
need a better DNSBL client/configure it properly.
On 2021-02-02 05:28, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
Dnia 1.02.2021 o godz. 23:54:
As per the RFCs, DNSBLs should only be returning 127/8 values, anything
else must be considered an error by the filter and ignored instead of
being a listing.
This is how you avoid DNSBLs blowing up on you when their domains
accidentally expire and are wild-carding with fixed advertising IPs.
On 2021-01-21 07:26, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 13:08 +0100, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:
So yes, perhaps it's not extortion. We may call it demanding money with
menaces, exaction, extraction, blackmail...
Lot's of things in life require payment(s), or purc
On 2021-01-20 05:10, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
On one hand, UCEPROTECT is relatively aggressive, and their unlisting policy is
at least questionable. However, running
a blacklist incurs costs in terms of server time and admin time, so if they
provide access for free, how should they
If anyone is receiving abuse complaints from "spamhaus.me", could you
fling me a verbatim copy of a couple of them?
It isn't Spamhaus - I somehow doubt it has operations in Russia. It
doesn't even have a web site.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mail
On 2020-12-21 22:15, Jay Hennigan via mailop wrote:
On 12/21/20 18:55, John Levine via mailop wrote:
The politest term I have for Sendgrid's actions here is deeply
irresponsible.
Agreed, but not solely because of the content of the message. It, like
much of what comes from Sendgrid, is bulk
On 2020-12-20 14:00, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
The original quote, IIRC, was talking about Henry Spencer at UT Zoology, who
got Usenet that way for a while.
More likely it was in relation to Australia's Usenet "feed" which was a daily
FedEx air shipment of 9-track tapes. At the time, FedEx Air w
For a couple of years, the Usenet link to/from Australia were magtape
exchanges on a routine NASA flight out of, if I remember right, NASA
Ames. It was piggybacked on the shipment of data to/from joint
NASA-Australia projects. I used to correspond occasionally with the guy
involved in doing th
On 2020-12-19 16:43, John Levine via mailop wrote:
In article <12329a9a-11a7-eda4-c88a-3dc352aea...@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net>
you write:
On 12/18/20 12:29 PM, John Levine via mailop wrote:
As I recall some sites were getting stuck on the nolist host for
every message.
Odd.
Perhaps it ha
On 2020-12-15 18:04, Chris Wedgwood via mailop wrote:
things break, it happens...
but why 5xx (vs 4xx) in this case?
this means means emails are being lost, some of won't/can't be resent
and recovered
with 4xx most of them would be delivered once things come right
the confidence
On 2020-12-17 18:17, L. Mark Stone via mailop wrote:
Hi John,
Unfortunately, many sending clients (newsletters, announcements, etc.) do not
retry if the initial delivery fails. So if your primary MX has network issues,
doesn't comprise a load balancer in front of multiple MTAs and you are doin
On 2020-12-17 18:21, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
[paraphrased]
> I'd think the best way to deliver spam is via a properly configured >
> mail server.
Well yeah, but including a copy of, say, Exchange or Sendmail in a
traditional bit of Desktop or Server malware is easier said than done.
modern mailers handle things
(haven't had need to look at that in a while).
--
Chris Adams
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Caution brain bending ahead:
Secondary MXes have a role as your main mail server. Long experience
with spambotnets reveals that most of them are pretty stupid, because
their MX capabilities are limited. In fact, many spambots infections
don't do any DNS lookups at all, and rely on pre-record
On 2020-12-17 11:12, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
I don't know if they are giving up, finally realizing that generating
spam for IoT devices isn't getting through, but it seems that we are at
a 12 month low for that form of attack.
Don't get me wrong, still averaging 25% of all inbound
things break, it happens...
but why 5xx (vs 4xx) in this case?
this means means emails are being lost, some of won't/can't be resent
and recovered
with 4xx most of them would be delivered once things come right
the confidence in a hard-bounce in this instance seems misplaced
___
> Gmail was (and still is) sending out false ‘unknown address’
> responses. One person ever reported their own (working, logged into)
> gmail address bouncing.
can confirm
a quick twitter search indicates large numbers of people experiencing
the same
fwiw, i saw dead-air (messages accepted but
We are seeing it also.
On Dec 14, 2020, at 5:12 PM, David Landers via mailop wrote:
Yes, it started about an hour or so ago for us. Accounts that had delivered
yesterday or even earlier today in some cases are now seeing that error.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 7:00 PM Bez Thomas via mailop
mai
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 12:30, Paul Waring via mailop
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:37:35AM +, Rob Kendrick via mailop wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:21:19AM +, Paul Waring via mailop wrote:
> > > Before I change any more settings, I was wondering if there was a time
> > > per
(Sorry for double reply...)
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 13:29, Chris Woods <
christopherwoods+list-mai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Correct the PTR, it's currently "romana.vs.mythic-beasts.com".
>>
>
Unless it's out of preference you're leaving it like that -
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 13:58, Paul Waring wrote:
> No, they say:
>
> SPF:PASS with IP 2a00:1098:82:b3:0:0:0:1
> DKIM: 'PASS' with domain xk7.net
> DMARC: 'PASS'
>
> There is no warning about no authentication (and there shouldn't be).
>
> > My SPFs tend to be slightly more verbose, remembe
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, 17:58 Brandon Long, wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 8:08 AM Chris Woods via mailop
> wrote:
>
>> Tangentially, while not a bounce-after-accept, one user has been seeing
>> this 5.7.1 NDR when emailing a contact's GSuite account.
On 2020-10-30 04:43, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
The mail server ingress needs to decide whether to accept a mail message
based on criteria that are relatively fast to evaluate. DNSBL lookups,
SPF-checks etc can be done fast. Part of this is applying heuristics do
reject mails with ap
Tangentially, while not a bounce-after-accept, one user has been seeing
this 5.7.1 NDR when emailing a contact's GSuite account. It does seem
similar to an organisational bounce or incorrectly configured forward,
frankly I'm not sure what to make of it. Typically you can't reach a
Workspace support
?
Thanks in advance,
Chris Truitt
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
