And let's not pass up:
*Anarchy*
Sites containing information regarding militias, weapons, antigovernment
groups, terrorism, and simliar sites.
So, that's pretty much all of Fox news, right? (well, *all* news sites.)
*Hate/Discrimination*
Sites which target a group of people based on ra
Y'all are cracking me up.
:D
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDe
On 2014-10-23 1:31 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/23/2014 2:01 PM, Kees Theunissen wrote:
define(`confMATCH_GECOS',`true')dnl
Don't use that! It is way too fuzzy and error prone. At least it was
a long time ago on a Silicon Graphics Irix 5.x system.
Sounds like some sed/awk parsing of pas
On 2014-10-23 11:29 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/23/2014 11:36 AM, Ben Kamen wrote:
I don't remember "unconfiguring this" -- but my system currently doesn't accept mail at
the "full name" user field like it used to.
I wonder if over time I managed to t
I don't remember "unconfiguring this" -- but my system currently doesn't accept mail at
the "full name" user field like it used to.
I wonder if over time I managed to turn it off.
What's the config option so that sendmail accepts mail to a user's "
On 2013-11-25 7:55 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 13:38:56 -0600
Ben Kamen wrote:
I don't see any of those in my /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter, where
would I normally see those or do I have to write them?
You'd have to write them, and if you don't need them yo
On 2013-11-22 2:25 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
You should not call read_commands_file from filter_end. It should only
be called from filter_relay, filter_helo, filter_sender or filter_recipient
Hi David,
I don't see any of those in my /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter, where would I
normally see t
On 2013-11-22 1:09 PM, Ben Kamen wrote:
On 2013-11-22 12:52 PM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Ben Kamen wrote:
Just put it in before you do any action_bounce
Joseph Brennan
Got it -- thanks!
Erm, I don't think that quite worked.
In my /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter, I have:
sub filte
On 2013-11-22 12:52 PM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Ben Kamen wrote:
Just put it in before you do any action_bounce
Joseph Brennan
Got it -- thanks!
-ben
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL
Thanks for all the replies...
I don't actually need to worry about "port number" -- 465 or 587... as long as
the user has
authenticated, that's what I'm chasing after.
For Steffen,
I'm looking in /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter and don't see filter_recipient or
filter_sender.
(I'm on mimedefang
Hey all,
I need a little quick help -- in my mimedefang milter, what can I put in to
bypass checking emails being relayed by my server submitted on 587 by
authorized users??
Thanks,
-Ben
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate
Hey all,
Now that we've see/talked some stats on SPF... I'd be interested to know what
anyone might have to offer on DKIM usefulness.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b...@benjammin.net
On 2013-03-27 8:49 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Welcome to the IT industry... a giant pile of fail.
Amen to that!
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b...@benjammin.net http://www.benjammin.net
Am 25.03.2013 04:42, schrieb Ben Kamen:
The way I understand it, it does neither of the two. You have to
specify them all yourself in the config file as described in the
initial comment of FreeMail.pm:
### Supported .cf clauses:
#
# freemail_domains domain ...
#
#List of domains to be used
(through sa "learn")..
Thanks,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b...@benjammin.net http://www.benjammin.net
Fortune says:
Romulan women are not like Vulcan females. We are not dedicated to
pur
outers, and if the
DKIM rules are enabled.
Mike, that's a most excellent observation|tech tip!
Thanks!
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b...@benjammin.net http://www.be
On 2012-08-17 2:09 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Hi, all,
I've had a request to end this thread as it's off-topic and I tend to
agree. Let's let it go.
I thought it was interesting - but agree. I have a couple more emails queued
before this one.
This will be my last on the subject.
Cheers,
-
On 2012-08-17 2:08 PM, John Nemeth wrote:
On Jan 7, 7:40am, Ben Kamen wrote:
}
} These were seasoned/experience MAIL ADMINs...
Some people have ten years of experience, others have one year of
experience repeated nine times. Or, in this case, one month of
experience repeated 119 times
Curiosity question for Todd and Jon,
At this point in the game with people moving to very web based mail operation,
are there any compelling reasons are there to stick with Exchange in the
future? (other than legacy setup and a new learning curve?)
And have your companies considered moving to
On 2012-08-17 1:52 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
If you pick a random Exchange admin from the whole population, you're
more likely to end up with an incompetent one than if you try the same
thing with Sendmail admins, for the simple reasons that Sendmail is
less popular than Exchange and it requires
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:08:34 -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
A) Microsoft's Active Directory Domains pre-date the general concept
of Internet Domains.
Not possible.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Directory
I had an official internet email address in 1989 when I was on GEnie
Informatio
On 2012-08-17 12:41 PM, Jon Rowlan wrote:
Did I miss something?
I forgot to conclude...
For YOU: you sort of did miss something.. but not in a bad way.
You have experience far beyond your Exchange brethren.
It's a good thing. I wouldn't be upset I didn't "get that one"...
-Ben
p.s. I als
On 2012-08-17 12:41 PM, Jon Rowlan wrote:
As I run exchange and sendmail/MD systems I thought I would see why the
exchange bods were being bashed again ...
Did I miss something?
Sort of. And it's because you run sendmail/MD systems (most importantly, not
exchange).
My best story on exchange
On 2012-08-17 12:05 PM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
Ben wrote on 08/17/2012 12:39:45 PM:
Not a whole lot you can do for them.
Lately, my attitude runs towards "Just because you can install Exchange
doesn't mean you know what you're doing."
And I've run into those types...
They're scary.
-Ben
On 2012-08-17 4:29 AM, Nathan Findley wrote:
Is it generally accepted as being ok to directly contact the other servers email administrator in
order to try to resolve an undelivered email? I am finding myself being berated by the other
systems admin for my "unconventional" methods in trying to
dentify the username.
I looked at the PDF and there's banners obscuring some of the article body
(just an FYI)
but I'll read it more closely.
Thanks again KAM,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eM
On 2012-08-02 4:37 PM, John Nemeth wrote:
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2005-April/026563.html
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2005-September/028147.html
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2006-June/030475.html
http://lists.roaringpen
On 2012-08-01 7:22 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 01:23:33 -0500
Ben Kamen wrote:
But what's weird is that I updated /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
with my settings and that seems to be the one in use even
You probably need to do "md-mx-ctrl reread" to hav
On 2012-08-01 1:23 AM, Ben Kamen wrote:
On 2012-08-01 12:55 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
If _you_ (aka your filter) pass ~dest_user/.spamassassin/user_prefs as
userprefs_filename to SpamAssassin, yes.
If not, no.
Per default MIMEDefang uses a global config file, one for all:
if (!defined
't see any place explicitly calling out
~dest_user/.spamassassin/userprefs in any form (still looking)
is it normally a default that it's added to SA or does it need to be specified?
Thanks Steffen,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
-
Quick yes/no...
when using SA though MD, does SA still check the user_prefs (for
white/blacklisting) in the
destination user's homedir/.spamassassin/ directory?
I whitelisted *@domain.com and just got an email still marked as spam by SA.
Thanks,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T.
Just curious -- has anyone written any plugins to plot history information from
mime-defang to Munin?
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b...@benjammin.net http://www.benjammin.net
On 2012-07-16 3:23 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:18:22 -0500
Ben Kamen wrote:
We use Mail::DKIM directly from MIMEDefang to sign messages.
Erm, so if you would please elaborate a little further...
We have a little routine like this in our filter:
sub dkim_sign
On 2012-07-16 3:03 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 22:31:05 -0500
Ben Kamen wrote:
So I'd like to do DKIM now and I see where I do the signing part in
sendmail -- but was curious what the best way to do it with
mime-defang was -- through SpamAssassin (and then add checks
-- through SpamAssassin (and then add checks in MD
or let SA do all the work?)
If any of you played and found good/bad things to do/avoid -- I'd like to hear
that too.
Thanks,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b..
sions
I love Regexp's! And I definitely know people who might like to see this.
Thanks!
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b...@benjammin.net http://www.ben
On 2012-06-07 1:05 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:41:53 -0500
Ben Kamen wrote:
Has anyone else seen an increase since the breach?
Not really. But interestingly, I've seen a few emails to my theoretically
secret former LinkedIn address. These are in my logs from b
since the leak, I've definitely seen an immediate uptick in fishing to my email
address.
Well...
Maybe not.
;)
Has anyone else seen an increase since the breach?
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMa
tence...
Thankfully, LinkedIn uses a reasonably unique password unlike anywhere else I
run on the web.
But the incompetence.. ugh...
I want to shout, "what is wrong with these companies" --- but I already know
the answer.
It's not pretty. In fact, it's pretty depressing.
(sigh
On 2011-11-17 3:05 PM, d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
Those people checking for valid MX records for a sender's domain from
within MIMEdefang ... is anybody checking if a sender's one and only MX
record is a fake MX tempfailing service? Has anyone ever seen this type
of setup for legitimate e-mai
On 2/22/2011 5:34 PM, James Ralston wrote:
CentOS 5 (rebranded RHEL5) is freely available, and plays reasonably
nicely in a VM:
http://www.centos.org/
I've been running CentOS over the last year and have been looking to replace my
current RH-Fedora server with it.
-Ben
--
Ben
(although possibly not a '101' subject) the TXT record
used for things like SPF? (although maybe no longer relevant)
This is nice. I'm going to link it on my website.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
E
On 2/16/2010 10:51 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Vista is irrelevant. If you read any trade literature at all you would
never have touched it in the first place. Just like any X.0 version of a
linux distribution. But realistically, the problem in Vista was changing
the driver interface, something that
On 2/16/2010 10:02 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Windows 2000 is a decade old now - and was not even intended to be a
desktop OS. And you need to defrag after making big disk changes. If you
don't already see why this is a bad comparision, try installing a
10-year old Linux server distro and try to up
hings.
Windows patchs might fix things... O it might be installing covert
windows software
that allow Microsoft, the NSA, SOME government with monetary stake in MS or, or
even the execs in HOLLYWOOD to wreak control of your PC and it's content.
Grrrr...
-Ben
--
Ben
Sorry for my delay'd jump in...
I agree with the concept of not having a linux system around, but I can also see how it's
possible to have a system without a GUI around. The GUI's suck a lot of performance and
while on a sort of "admin only" box, it's nice to save the space.
So I have a mix.
lling off zombie child..." to something possibly more PC/less offensive.
Ha!
--Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
Fortune says:
Once, there
I've been using spampoison.com of late.
Kinda makes me laugh.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammi
On 1/14/2010 4:12 PM, - wrote:
I had that for a bit where my low priority MX host was routed to self and SBC
(Ameritech)
used to reject any email from as their servers knew the seconday/low-priority
route was bogus.
Poo.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P
;ll
run into a honeypot sooner or later and get DNS-BL'd by one of the bigger
lists. (and then trickle down)
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benja
). Coupled
with the fact that their directory listing is so easy to crawl.. I'm screwed.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
As se
and they get endless pages of bogus email addy's
-- a lot at domains of known spammers.
Fun!
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
As seen so
That reminds me,
I lost my sendmail blackhole script when my server crashed last year...
I think some people asked me for it -- if you still have a copy you could email
me,
I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks,
-Ben
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer o
David F. Skoll wrote:
I think I'll stick to "xpdf" for now.
Yay xpdf!!
-ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
As seen somew
;
Turning off Javascript and looking for a patch that doesn't require downloading iTunes or
QuickTime. (snicker)
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.
Again, wider general populous of admins are clueless when it comes to which ones
to block. It's really kinda sad.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.ne
Rob MacGregor wrote:
On 1/29/07, Ben Kamen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yea, I meant to control port 25 egress from nets like Cable/DSL/Dialup
users...
Me, personally, I'd hate it. I can deliver mail faster and more
reliably (from past experience) than my ISP. When that's
David F. Skoll wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Err, How would my server deliver normal, legitimate email to your
servers addressed to you, etc.
I suspect Ben meant: "What's the consensus on blocking outbound
port 25 for home users? (DSL/Cable-Modem/Dialup)"
Yea, I meant to control port 25 e
odd? the telco's are some
of the worst for sourcing spam.)
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
The trouble with doing something right the first time is th
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Why support a free protocol with a quality implementation when you can
*sell* them your proprietary alternative?! (Ie. Exchange.)
The IMAP mail list has eluded to the same thing.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other l
ith some
amount of pith only to incite Mark Crispin having to
explain exactly WHY IMAP didn't work so well due
to (specific examples) MS's lack of adherence to
the protocol.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
==
Email: bk
Communications
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
The ornaments of our house are the friends that frequent it.
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson
uessing TLS
with qmail still hasn't been fixed. So I've adjusted the access file accordingly
to not even try...
Has anyone else ever looking into why Qmail has such TLS problems with Sendmail?
Just curious...
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
==
very greatfull for an example.
Keyword filtering is a VERY dangerous thing.
We can't stress strongly enough how it can generate a LOT of false
positives.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net
;what can I do about it". I've been using sendmail for about 11yrs now.
However, I do like the fact that the link you provided shows a
practical example (I'm sure there's many).. which is always fun
to read.
Anyway - thank
d thanks for putting up with a post like
that here. The sendmail list is usually clogged with much more neophyte admins
asking how to get sendmail running...
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net
Has anyone noticed this? I'm seeing a lot of open connections in Sendmail like
this:
sendmail: server 71-10-225-162.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com [71.10.225.162] cmd read
They eventually time out... but still... it's consuming connections.
any thoughts?
--
ingpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.ben
Gary Funck wrote:
Something like that ... Congrats, David, and thanks for
all your work and contributions to MIMEDefang.
http://webcast.sys-con.com/general/registerpenguin.htm
Webinar:
Thursday, November 17, 2006 - 2:00 PM EST
Weird. I thought today was the 16th?
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
Ok, so I just emailed someone at earthlink and got one of those annoying
auto-messages that say I have to go through their verification process to get my email
to the subscriber...
Besides the fact I dislike these mechs, the only reason I can think of that they
are bad is that if I ALSO had such
Oh yea, sorry - forwarders for bind.
:D
Jason Bertoch wrote:
In short, I don't know how to configure bind to always query another
nameserver rather than use the root servers. Any hints?
regards,
KAM
Use the "forwarders" option in named.conf.
iling list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
Tonight's the ni
While I realize it wouldn't kill a lot of Spam, I still get ones
that are dated more than +-2weeks. (more like >1year)
Is anyone doing this, do you think it's worth while and would you be willing to
share your filter code for this?
-Ben
___
NOTE: I
Kris Deugau wrote:
>
> I regularly horrify *myself* with code I wrote six months ago.
>
> "What was I smoking, and where can I get a fresh supply?!?"
>
Don't worry - I've seen expert PERL programmers horrified by code they wrote 3
weeks prior...
PERL is ju
As a sidenote, I do remember reading (although I can't remember where)
that it's considered bad form to assign an IP address to a domain.
IP's should be assigned to hosts...
Anyone else ever read that? I can't remember if it was an RFC or what.
-Ben
--
Ben
les this method (port based mapping)
as well as a full IP to IP mapping just fine.
But I don't know all the needs you have - just thought I would mention it.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
==
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT
ail - see
http://antispam.imp.ch/03-wormlist.html, $&{client_addr} is infected with a
virus or worm !', `t', `127.0.0.4.')
The comma after .html shouldn't be there. Sendmail barks about too many args for
`len'.
amusement than anything) to call the
phone company to let them know they are transmitting bad CallerID data.
Wanna know how many people understood what I was talking about? (I spoke to like
3 supervisors).
You guess it - Zero.
Hahaha...
-Ben
--
Ben Kam
finding a
person who enjoys paying taxes.)
Happy Trails,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.benjammin.net
___
NOTE: If
ir solution: I should buy a new DSL modem.
My Solution: I cancelled my account. I spend enough time on the computer at
work. :)
We won't even get into the whole process of canceling my service and all the
problems I had th
pretty far reaching
problem. There is also a discussion going on over at Google about this
problem. ...
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/24/1538205
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
raining down on your cubicle.. (ala
"Geek Squad" in not so sheik bugs)
I could see an ISP just blocking you out until you fix it...
And in all three, maybe they just stop your port 587 submissions and make you
use some form of web mail.
Lots of potentials for that one,
-Ben
US to deliver your email
Let AOL and Yahoo email each other. ;)
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.benjammin.net
___
NOTE: If
No need to apologize. You're hosting the list and we are just happy as can be
that you do so and that we have access your brain. ;)
Thanks as always,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROT
Check the permissions and mode bits of the directory...
then compare that to what user your sendmail system is running as and if that
user has
rwx access to the dir.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
==
Email: bkamen AT
David F. Skoll wrote:
Web browsing, P2P and FTP probably swamp e-mail.
FTP? You mean people still use that?
;)
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http:
is.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.benjammin.net
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
mess
Ben Kamen wrote:
I don't run PGP on this box... (laffin)
Er, that's PHP... (hey, I was one letter off... you all knew what I meant! :) )
-Ben
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NUL
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 17:13 -0600, Ben Kamen wrote:
Speaking of which, I saw these in my logs today...
"POST /xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1" 500 256
"POST /blog/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1" 500 256
"POST /blog/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1" 500 256
"
Speaking of which, I saw these in my logs today...
"POST /xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1" 500 256
"POST /blog/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1" 500 256
"POST /blog/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1" 500 256
"POST /blogs/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1" 500 256
"POST /drupal/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1" 500 256
"POST /phpgroupware/xmlrpc.ph
good chuckle this morning. :)
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.benjammin.net
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerp
Lisa Casey wrote:
I think moving /var/spool/MIMEDefang onto a RAMdisk is a good idea. I've
not set up a RAMdisk before, but I've done some googling and think I can
get it done.
Question: I have 512 MG RAM on the system. Say I decrease MX_MAXIMUM to
15, how big should I make the RAMdisk?
W
John Barton wrote:
Ben Kamen wrote:
Does anyone know of any TLS issues with Qmail Servers talking to
Sendmail?
I seem to have 1 server I send emails to that consistently have TLS
handshake problems.
It's the ONLY server I see problems like that with.. So I'm not
thinking it&
Does anyone know of any TLS issues with Qmail Servers talking to Sendmail?
I seem to have 1 server I send emails to that consistently have TLS handshake
problems.
It's the ONLY server I see problems like that with.. So I'm not thinking it's
me.
Thoughts?
-Ben
Well, besides being completely off-topic for this list, you should set speed and duplex to AUTO if
available.
Unless you have a 100Mbs SWITCH (not hub, there's a difference) to plug it into,
manually setting the duplex to full will gain you nothing and possibly wreak havoc on
the network.
For
lot of attacks that don't use multiple recipients in one
transaction... they figured that one out... so they do one per connection...
That's why I added it to the "null route" program instead.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 03:05:45PM -0600, Alex Moore wrote:
A spammer tries many times to find a user with something like a
dictionary attack or a list of commonly used user names.
How can I setup a rule in MIMEDefang to define those transactions? Say
when a smtp serv
Mack wrote:
What about changing the SMTP Greeting to say that by communicating with this
server you accept it's terms and conditions and by communicating with it you
accept that any other disclaimersr are null and voidified (is that a word?)
O - I like that. What an interesting concept..
Hahahahahahahha... You are very funny...
You forgot the "this disclaimer trumphs all times infinity" part...
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
==
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.ben
I agree with you David. The Disclaimers are getting out of control.
You are right about unsubscribing people from the list who append such
rediculous legalese..
-Ben
begin:vcard
fn:Ben Kamen
n:Kamen;Ben
adr:;;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:O.D.T. - S.P.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
u
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
