And let's not pass up:
*Anarchy*
Sites containing information regarding militias, weapons, antigovernment
groups, terrorism, and simliar sites.
So, that's pretty much all of Fox news, right? (well, *all* news sites.)
*Hate/Discrimination*
Sites which target a group of people based on
Y'all are cracking me up.
:D
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list
I don't remember unconfiguring this -- but my system currently doesn't accept mail at
the full name user field like it used to.
I wonder if over time I managed to turn it off.
What's the config option so that sendmail accepts mail to a user's Full Name
field?
(like mine is Ben Kamen -- so
On 2014-10-23 11:29 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/23/2014 11:36 AM, Ben Kamen wrote:
I don't remember unconfiguring this -- but my system currently doesn't accept mail at
the full name user field like it used to.
I wonder if over time I managed to turn it off.
What's the config option so
On 2013-11-25 7:55 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 13:38:56 -0600
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
I don't see any of those in my /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter, where
would I normally see those or do I have to write them?
You'd have to write them, and if you don't need
On 2013-11-22 2:25 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
You should not call read_commands_file from filter_end. It should only
be called from filter_relay, filter_helo, filter_sender or filter_recipient
Hi David,
I don't see any of those in my /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter, where would I
normally see
Thanks for all the replies...
I don't actually need to worry about port number -- 465 or 587... as long as
the user has
authenticated, that's what I'm chasing after.
For Steffen,
I'm looking in /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter and don't see filter_recipient or
filter_sender.
(I'm on mimedefang
On 2013-11-22 12:52 PM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
Just put it in before you do any action_bounce
Joseph Brennan
Got it -- thanks!
-ben
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
On 2013-11-22 1:09 PM, Ben Kamen wrote:
On 2013-11-22 12:52 PM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
Just put it in before you do any action_bounce
Joseph Brennan
Got it -- thanks!
Erm, I don't think that quite worked.
In my /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter, I have
Hey all,
I need a little quick help -- in my mimedefang milter, what can I put in to
bypass checking emails being relayed by my server submitted on 587 by
authorized users??
Thanks,
-Ben
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal
Hey all,
Now that we've see/talked some stats on SPF... I'd be interested to know what
anyone might have to offer on DKIM usefulness.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b...@benjammin.net http
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b...@benjammin.net http://www.benjammin.net
Fortune says:
Romulan women are not like Vulcan females. We are not dedicated to
pure logic and the sterility of non-emotion
Am 25.03.2013 04:42, schrieb Ben Kamen:
The way I understand it, it does neither of the two. You have to
specify them all yourself in the config file as described in the
initial comment of FreeMail.pm:
### Supported .cf clauses:
#
# freemail_domains domain ...
#
#List of domains to be used
, and if the
DKIM rules are enabled.
Mike, that's a most excellent observation|tech tip!
Thanks!
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b...@benjammin.net http://www.benjammin.net
On 2012-08-17 4:29 AM, Nathan Findley wrote:
Is it generally accepted as being ok to directly contact the other servers email administrator in
order to try to resolve an undelivered email? I am finding myself being berated by the other
systems admin for my unconventional methods in trying to
On 2012-08-17 12:05 PM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
Ben wrote on 08/17/2012 12:39:45 PM:
Not a whole lot you can do for them.
Lately, my attitude runs towards Just because you can install Exchange
doesn't mean you know what you're doing.
And I've run into those types...
They're scary.
-Ben
On 2012-08-17 12:41 PM, Jon Rowlan wrote:
As I run exchange and sendmail/MD systems I thought I would see why the
exchange bods were being bashed again ...
Did I miss something?
Sort of. And it's because you run sendmail/MD systems (most importantly, not
exchange).
My best story on
On 2012-08-17 12:41 PM, Jon Rowlan wrote:
Did I miss something?
I forgot to conclude...
For YOU: you sort of did miss something.. but not in a bad way.
You have experience far beyond your Exchange brethren.
It's a good thing. I wouldn't be upset I didn't get that one...
-Ben
p.s. I also
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:08:34 -0400 Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
A) Microsoft's Active Directory Domains pre-date the general concept
of Internet Domains.
Not possible.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Directory
I had an official internet email address in 1989 when I was on
On 2012-08-17 1:52 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
If you pick a random Exchange admin from the whole population, you're
more likely to end up with an incompetent one than if you try the same
thing with Sendmail admins, for the simple reasons that Sendmail is
less popular than Exchange and it
Curiosity question for Todd and Jon,
At this point in the game with people moving to very web based mail operation,
are there any compelling reasons are there to stick with Exchange in the
future? (other than legacy setup and a new learning curve?)
And have your companies considered moving to
On 2012-08-17 2:08 PM, John Nemeth wrote:
On Jan 7, 7:40am, Ben Kamen wrote:
}
} These were seasoned/experience MAIL ADMINs...
Some people have ten years of experience, others have one year of
experience repeated nine times. Or, in this case, one month of
experience repeated 119 times
On 2012-08-17 2:09 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Hi, all,
I've had a request to end this thread as it's off-topic and I tend to
agree. Let's let it go.
I thought it was interesting - but agree. I have a couple more emails queued
before this one.
This will be my last on the subject.
Cheers,
On 2012-08-02 4:37 PM, John Nemeth wrote:
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2005-April/026563.html
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2005-September/028147.html
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2006-June/030475.html
On 2012-08-01 7:22 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 01:23:33 -0500
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
But what's weird is that I updated /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
with my settings and that seems to be the one in use even
You probably need to do md-mx-ctrl reread to have
Quick yes/no...
when using SA though MD, does SA still check the user_prefs (for
white/blacklisting) in the
destination user's homedir/.spamassassin/ directory?
I whitelisted *@domain.com and just got an email still marked as spam by SA.
Thanks,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P
Just curious -- has anyone written any plugins to plot history information from
mime-defang to Munin?
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b...@benjammin.net http://www.benjammin.net
On 2012-07-16 3:03 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 22:31:05 -0500
Ben Kamen bka...@cornelius.benjammin.net wrote:
So I'd like to do DKIM now and I see where I do the signing part in
sendmail -- but was curious what the best way to do it with
mime-defang was -- through
On 2012-07-16 3:23 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:18:22 -0500
Ben Kamen bka...@cornelius.benjammin.net wrote:
We use Mail::DKIM directly from MIMEDefang to sign messages.
Erm, so if you would please elaborate a little further...
We have a little routine like this in our
SpamAssassin (and then add checks in MD
or let SA do all the work?)
If any of you played and found good/bad things to do/avoid -- I'd like to hear
that too.
Thanks,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b...@benjammin.net
I love Regexp's! And I definitely know people who might like to see this.
Thanks!
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b...@benjammin.net http://www.benjammin.net
since the leak, I've definitely seen an immediate uptick in fishing to my email
address.
Well...
Maybe not.
;)
Has anyone else seen an increase since the breach?
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail: b
On 2012-06-07 1:05 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:41:53 -0500
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
Has anyone else seen an increase since the breach?
Not really. But interestingly, I've seen a few emails to my theoretically
secret former LinkedIn address. These are in my
...
Thankfully, LinkedIn uses a reasonably unique password unlike anywhere else I
run on the web.
But the incompetence.. ugh...
I want to shout, what is wrong with these companies --- but I already know
the answer.
It's not pretty. In fact, it's pretty depressing.
(sigh)
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
On 2011-11-17 3:05 PM, d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
Those people checking for valid MX records for a sender's domain from
within MIMEdefang ... is anybody checking if a sender's one and only MX
record is a fake MX tempfailing service? Has anyone ever seen this type
of setup for legitimate
On 2/22/2011 5:34 PM, James Ralston wrote:
CentOS 5 (rebranded RHEL5) is freely available, and plays reasonably
nicely in a VM:
http://www.centos.org/
I've been running CentOS over the last year and have been looking to replace my
current RH-Fedora server with it.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
(although possibly not a '101' subject) the TXT record
used for things like SPF? (although maybe no longer relevant)
This is nice. I'm going to link it on my website.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen
patchs might fix things... O it might be installing covert
windows software
that allow Microsoft, the NSA, SOME government with monetary stake in MS or, or
even the execs in HOLLYWOOD to wreak control of your PC and it's content.
G...
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P
On 2/16/2010 10:02 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Windows 2000 is a decade old now - and was not even intended to be a
desktop OS. And you need to defrag after making big disk changes. If you
don't already see why this is a bad comparision, try installing a
10-year old Linux server distro and try to
On 2/16/2010 10:51 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Vista is irrelevant. If you read any trade literature at all you would
never have touched it in the first place. Just like any X.0 version of a
linux distribution. But realistically, the problem in Vista was changing
the driver interface, something
zombie child... to something possibly more PC/less offensive.
Ha!
--Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
Fortune says:
Once, there was NO fun
On 1/14/2010 4:12 PM, - wrote:
I had that for a bit where my low priority MX host was routed to self and SBC
(Ameritech)
used to reject any email from as their servers knew the seconday/low-priority
route was bogus.
Poo.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P
of bogus email addy's
-- a lot at domains of known spammers.
Fun!
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
As seen somewhere on the net: My other
to crawl.. I'm screwed.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
As seen somewhere on the net: My other computer is your Windows Server
That reminds me,
I lost my sendmail blackhole script when my server crashed last year...
I think some people asked me for it -- if you still have a copy you could email
me,
I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks,
-Ben
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer
Javascript and looking for a patch that doesn't require downloading iTunes or
QuickTime. (snicker)
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
As seen
David F. Skoll wrote:
I think I'll stick to xpdf for now.
Yay xpdf!!
-ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
As seen somewhere on the net
Rob MacGregor wrote:
On 1/29/07, Ben Kamen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea, I meant to control port 25 egress from nets like Cable/DSL/Dialup
users...
Me, personally, I'd hate it. I can deliver mail faster and more
reliably (from past experience) than my ISP. When that's not an
option I
populous of admins are clueless when it comes to which ones
to block. It's really kinda sad.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
Alex Haley was adopted
of pith only to incite Mark Crispin having to
explain exactly WHY IMAP didn't work so well due
to (specific examples) MS's lack of adherence to
the protocol.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
==
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Why support a free protocol with a quality implementation when you can
*sell* them your proprietary alternative?! (Ie. Exchange.)
The IMAP mail list has eluded to the same thing.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other
Communications www.speed.net
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
The ornaments of our house are the friends that frequent it.
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson
fixed. So I've adjusted the access file accordingly
to not even try...
Has anyone else ever looking into why Qmail has such TLS problems with Sendmail?
Just curious...
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin
greatfull for an example.
Keyword filtering is a VERY dangerous thing.
We can't stress strongly enough how it can generate a LOT of false
positives.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web
I do about it. I've been using sendmail for about 11yrs now.
However, I do like the fact that the link you provided shows a
practical example (I'm sure there's many).. which is always fun
to read.
Anyway - thanks,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
Has anyone noticed this? I'm seeing a lot of open connections in Sendmail like
this:
sendmail: server 71-10-225-162.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com [71.10.225.162] cmd read
They eventually time out... but still... it's consuming connections.
any thoughts?
--
Ben Kamen
that here. The sendmail list is usually clogged with much more neophyte admins
asking how to get sendmail running...
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
Remember
mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
She missed an invaluable
Gary Funck wrote:
Something like that ... Congrats, David, and thanks for
all your work and contributions to MIMEDefang.
http://webcast.sys-con.com/general/registerpenguin.htm
Webinar:
Thursday, November 17, 2006 - 2:00 PM EST
Weird. I thought today was the 16th?
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
Ok, so I just emailed someone at earthlink and got one of those annoying
auto-messages that say I have to go through their verification process to get my email
to the subscriber...
Besides the fact I dislike these mechs, the only reason I can think of that they
are bad is that if I ALSO had
Oh yea, sorry - forwarders for bind.
:D
Jason Bertoch wrote:
In short, I don't know how to configure bind to always query another
nameserver rather than use the root servers. Any hints?
regards,
KAM
Use the forwarders option in named.conf.
--
Ben Kamen
MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
--
Ben Kamen
=
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
Tonight's the night: Sleep
While I realize it wouldn't kill a lot of Spam, I still get ones
that are dated more than +-2weeks. (more like 1year)
Is anyone doing this, do you think it's worth while and would you be willing to
share your filter code for this?
-Ben
___
NOTE:
Kris Deugau wrote:
I regularly horrify *myself* with code I wrote six months ago.
What was I smoking, and where can I get a fresh supply?!?
Don't worry - I've seen expert PERL programmers horrified by code they wrote 3
weeks prior...
PERL is just like that.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen
As a sidenote, I do remember reading (although I can't remember where)
that it's considered bad form to assign an IP address to a domain.
IP's should be assigned to hosts...
Anyone else ever read that? I can't remember if it was an RFC or what.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P
(port based mapping)
as well as a full IP to IP mapping just fine.
But I don't know all the needs you have - just thought I would mention it.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
==
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http
modem.
My Solution: I cancelled my account. I spend enough time on the computer at
work. :)
We won't even get into the whole process of canceling my service and all the
problems I had there.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P
a
person who enjoys paying taxes.)
Happy Trails,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.benjammin.net
___
NOTE
://antispam.imp.ch/03-wormlist.html, ${client_addr} is infected with a
virus or worm !', `t', `127.0.0.4.')
The comma after .html shouldn't be there. Sendmail barks about too many args for
`len'.
Just FYI,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P
a discussion going on over at Google about this
problem. ...
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/24/1538205
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.benjammin.net
on your cubicle.. (ala
Geek Squad in not so sheik bugs)
I could see an ISP just blocking you out until you fix it...
And in all three, maybe they just stop your port 587 submissions and make you
use some form of web mail.
shrug
Lots of potentials for that one,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P
to deliver your email
Let AOL and Yahoo email each other. ;)
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.benjammin.net
___
NOTE
No need to apologize. You're hosting the list and we are just happy as can be
that you do so and that we have access your brain. ;)
Thanks as always,
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T, S.P.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Check the permissions and mode bits of the directory...
then compare that to what user your sendmail system is running as and if that
user has
rwx access to the dir.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
==
Email: bkamen
David F. Skoll wrote:
Web browsing, P2P and FTP probably swamp e-mail.
FTP? You mean people still use that?
;)
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit
As I read these emails and look at the measures which we must take to
prevent/ward-off the chaos inflicted on our systems I think to myself,
Oh yea.. those anti-spam laws in the US are working just fabulous!
(sigh)
My sympathies to all of us out there having to cope with this.
-Ben
--
Ben
Speaking of which, I saw these in my logs today...
POST /xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1 500 256
POST /blog/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1 500 256
POST /blog/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1 500 256
POST /blogs/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1 500 256
POST /drupal/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1 500 256
POST /phpgroupware/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 17:13 -0600, Ben Kamen wrote:
Speaking of which, I saw these in my logs today...
POST /xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1 500 256
POST /blog/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1 500 256
POST /blog/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1 500 256
POST /blogs/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1 500
Ben Kamen wrote:
I don't run PGP on this box... (laffin)
Er, that's PHP... (hey, I was one letter off... you all knew what I meant! :) )
-Ben
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID
Lisa Casey wrote:
I think moving /var/spool/MIMEDefang onto a RAMdisk is a good idea. I've
not set up a RAMdisk before, but I've done some googling and think I can
get it done.
Question: I have 512 MG RAM on the system. Say I decrease MX_MAXIMUM to
15, how big should I make the RAMdisk?
Does anyone know of any TLS issues with Qmail Servers talking to Sendmail?
I seem to have 1 server I send emails to that consistently have TLS handshake
problems.
It's the ONLY server I see problems like that with.. So I'm not thinking it's
me.
Thoughts?
-Ben
John Barton wrote:
Ben Kamen wrote:
Does anyone know of any TLS issues with Qmail Servers talking to
Sendmail?
I seem to have 1 server I send emails to that consistently have TLS
handshake problems.
It's the ONLY server I see problems like that with.. So I'm not
thinking it's me.
I
that don't use multiple recipients in one
transaction... they figured that one out... so they do one per connection...
That's why I added it to the null route program instead.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
==
Email: bkamen
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 03:05:45PM -0600, Alex Moore wrote:
A spammer tries many times to find a user with something like a
dictionary attack or a list of commonly used user names.
How can I setup a rule in MIMEDefang to define those transactions? Say
when a smtp
Hahahahahahahha... You are very funny...
You forgot the this disclaimer trumphs all times infinity part...
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
==
Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net
Mack wrote:
What about changing the SMTP Greeting to say that by communicating with this
server you accept it's terms and conditions and by communicating with it you
accept that any other disclaimersr are null and voidified (is that a word?)
O - I like that. What an interesting
I agree with you David. The Disclaimers are getting out of control.
You are right about unsubscribing people from the list who append such
rediculous legalese..
-Ben
begin:vcard
fn:Ben Kamen
n:Kamen;Ben
adr:;;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:O.D.T. - S.P.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
These spammers go through all this trouble to send us this crap...
The bayesian poisoning.
The images with the message.
Inviso-type...
the list goes on...
The one I've been seeing lately is a big text of jargon with an .jpg of a
topless lady with a stud in the backround
that says in the
Dave Williss wrote:
The one I've been seeing lately is a big text of jargon with an .jpg
of a topless lady with a stud in the backround
that says in the image She's dreaming about a strong man... click to
find out more and you can't click it!
U And you tried to click on the
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 03:59:10PM -0700, Ben Kamen wrote:
I was mousing over it to point it out to my friend and noticed the cursor
didn't change... i.e. the a href= tag was missing or malformed...
So we laughed.
But have you tried it with the most common
is that's what seems to be crapping on the net lately.
I got few of those - but not too many...
Interesting notes... thanks..
begin:vcard
fn:Ben Kamen
n:Kamen;Ben
adr:;;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:O.D.T. - S.P.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.benjammin.net/
version:2.1
SORBS is presently listing my IP space (/29) inside a TDSmetro static allocation
(69.128.98.0/24).
TDS knows.
SORBS has an email into them.
But other places are now falsely blocking me..
If any of you are having problems for no apparent reason, this might be why and
I thought I would share
I figured it out... works pretty well..
TTFN,
-Ben
begin:vcard
fn:Ben Kamen
n:Kamen;Ben
adr:;;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:O.D.T. - S.P.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.benjammin.net/
version:2.1
end:vcard
___
Visit
Anyone ever do this with vacation?
Please let me know offlist, I can't quite make this work the way it should seem
to do it..
Thanks,
-Ben
begin:vcard
fn:Ben Kamen
n:Kamen;Ben
adr:;;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:O.D.T. - S.P.
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
Has anyone ever written a script to process email's from the aliases file via
| command?
I know this is little OT, but the sendmail list is usually bogged.
I'd like to make a bouncer and another script to forward from a non-user email addy to me and respond back to the
original sender. (which
I've been noticing SPAM coming in tagged with the date of like 1/29/2003
has anyone else been seeing this??
So I thought it might be prudent to have a rule in mimedefang that bounces a
message older than
what most queues would have long since given up on..like a month.
Does this info (the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, this case
http://www.exim.org/pipermail/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20040412/069931.html
is rapidly falling out of favor. In fact, ibase.com has fixed that somewhat.
I'm worried in particular about the novice Exchange admin who has misconfigured
his Active Directory
I have similar online scripts I wrote but included timed posting limits... i.e.
No more than 5 per IP per 24hr period...
You may want to consider implementing similar safeguards..
--Ben
--
Ben Kamen - www.benjammin.net
___
Visit http
I'm noticing a lot more spams coming through base64 encoded lately... does
mimedefang decde and then filter or filter then decode? Otherwise, that
would make all the filters kinda useless...
anyone?
Thanks,
-Ben
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org
David F. Skoll wrote:
Super-Dome wrote:
how can i disallow use of my domain from outside network using *From address
of my domain.
You cannot.
Really... hehehe... that's what SPF was for to a large extent...
but since you can't FORCE ISP's and companies to hire admins instead of
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
