Nick Tonkin wrote:
>
> No one doubts your commitment to mod_perl, or your hard -- and unpaid
> -- work on the guide and many other things. But if you want to be a leader
> who inspires people to collaborate and work as a team under your
> direction, you'd do well to work on bringing your people s
Nick Tonkin wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>Antoine Quint wrote:
>>
>> >> If you[1] don't like the way the site is now,
>> >> don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge.
>> >
>> > Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing
>
One of the reasons you should probably not have a persistent/global CGI
object is that
upon a "new" the CGI module reads in numerous environment variables and
setups up its
internal structures for that particular query. If $q (in $q=new CGI) was
persistent/global
you would possibly have the wrong
actually all the subroutines are under TestRuntime.pm
I have used "use TestRuntime".
Is it solve this problem
or still something is there to configure..
Any suggestions..
Thanx,
Pratiksha
-Original Message-
From: Ged Haywood [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 November 2001 21:36
T
At 10:44 AM -0800 11/14/01, Nick Tonkin wrote:
>No one doubts your commitment to mod_perl, or your hard -- and unpaid
>-- work on the guide and many other things. But if you want to be a leader
>who inspires people to collaborate and work as a team under your
>direction, you'd do well to work on b
Hi there!
I'm trying to compile apache_1.3.22+mod_perl-1.26 on a redhat 7.1
linux box. I replace the original gcc 2.xx with gcc version 3.0.2
and perl 5.6.0 with perl 5.6.1 both compiled in the same box.
Any help will be highly appreciated
_ Jose Albert
These are the last lines of the outpu
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Manjrekar Pratiksha wrote:
> [Wed Nov 14 21:14:05 2001] [error] [Wed Nov 14 21:14:05 2001] null:
> Undefined subroutine &Apache::ROOT::vswap1_2e1_2e5::index_2eeml::my_start
> called at /apps/vswap1.1.5/index.eml line 13.
[snip]
> what might be reason for the above problem..
Hi...,
As per ur suggestion, I have installed Apache 1.3.20 and mod_perl 1.26.
It seems, the environement is OK..
whenever I am running some simple PERL scripts, it ran.
But whenever I am running my project, I got the following error in the
apache error log file.
[Wed Nov 14 21:14:05 2001] [err
"Jonathan E. Paton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please don't flame me, I'll go away... honest :P
I wonder if you're trying to do too much too soon?
If you're concerned about hosting then *gulp* PHP might server you
better. I rent a dedicated server because I want absolute control and
the abi
> Seemingly I can do Apache handlers though, so I *might* be
> okay.
If you look at http://perl.apache.org/guide/, there's information on how to
determine if you're really running mod_perl or not. If you can get a
PerlHandler directive to work, you have mod_perl.
> I rather ambigously asked the
Hi,
> > Perrin Harkins wrote:
> >
> > 2. Do most hosting companies allow
> > authentication/authorization handlers? (Using
> > HostRocket at the moment).
>
> Most hosting companies don't allow mod_perl.
>
I had fears about that one, since I thought Perl might not
mean mod_perl - as I know mo
At 10:44 am -0800 14/11/01, Nick Tonkin wrote:
>No one doubts your commitment to mod_perl, or your hard -- and unpaid
>-- work on the guide and many other things. But if you want to be a leader
>who inspires people to collaborate and work as a team under your
>direction, you'd do well to work on b
> 1. Can this be done (nicely) as a
> authentication/authorization handlier?
Sure, or you could do it as part of another phase if it's easier for you.
There are good exmples on CPAN or in the Eagle book.
> 2. Do most hosting companies allow
> authentication/authorization handlers? (Using HostRo
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Antoine Quint wrote:
>
> >> If you[1] don't like the way the site is now,
> >> don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge.
> >
> > Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing
> > the site with AxKit? C
Hi there,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Manjrekar Pratiksha wrote:
> Could you please suggest me a apache version as well as a mod_perl version
> compatible to it in the Solaris environment?
If you search the mod_perl mailing list I'm sure you will find many
references to Apache and mod_perl being used
Hi there,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, [iso-8859-1] Jonathan E. Paton wrote:
> I am trying to create a website [snip]
> NB - Whilst my preferred answer to these questions is a
> coded solution, [snip]
We like people to think for themselves on this list. :)
> I'm sure I've missed a few questions...
Re
Julian Martin wrote:
>
> Hi
> I am new to perl and would like to make a asp page with a script that will
> find all files in a given directory and create links to different files in
> another directory. The two sets of files are images (thumbnails and big
> pics) so I would also like to show the
I am trying to create a website with predominantly dynamic
content (mod_perl + DBI + mySQL) for an online community.
I can manage Perl and mySQL fairly proficently, however
I've no idea how to successfully create what I want using
mod_perl and Apache (actually, I know next to nothing about
them).
> That's usually pretty accurate, so I guess it really takes
> that long on your system. Try Apache::Request! Or even one
> of the lighter CGI modules like CGI_Lite.
>
> > in my case it means up to 4 connections per process, cause
> in fact it
> > is not one module but 2 (input and output)
Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 November 2001 17:48, Antoine Quint wrote:
>
>>> If you[1] don't like the way the site is now,
>>> don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge.
>>>
>>Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing
>>the site with AxK
> > If it was running under CGI, it would be compiling CGI.pm on each
request,
> > which I've seen take .3 seconds. Taking that long just to create the
new
> > CGI instance seems unusual. How did you time it? Are you using
> > Apache::DProf?
> >
>
> Wouldnt it be compiled at the use-statement ?
Hello again,
As you suggested I have used apache1.3.22 version..
However I have the following problem:
1. While installing modperl v1.24, i got a warning message that apache1.3.0
is recommended..Should I go ahead with it?(since you recommended
apache1.3.22)
2. I also tried apache v1.3.0 .During
Antoine Quint wrote:
>> If you[1] don't like the way the site is now,
>> don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge.
>
> Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing
> the site with AxKit? Coding websites with it is so easy!
Antoine, reread my o
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 17:48, Antoine Quint wrote:
> >If you[1] don't like the way the site is now,
> >don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge.
>
> Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing
> the site with AxKit? Coding websites with i
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 10:39:36AM -0500, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > its definitely running under mod_perl. But imho the time it takes to
> > create a new cgi-object should not depend too much wheter its running
> > under mod_perl or not, cause the CGI-module is loaded before. (In fact
> > I load i
sorry for the derangement, i solved it today
thanks anyway!
Thomas Bach
<><><><><>
think karo... bkaro.net
At 23:59 13/11/01 +0100, Thomas Bach wrote:
>Hello
>
>We're running a cobalt raq4 and have some problems with the apache
>configuration. the configuration over the web-interface works all
>If you[1] don't like the way the site is now,
>don't bitch about it but change it completing the challenge.
Well, I'd be up to having a crack at it... Would you be ok publishing
the site with AxKit? Coding websites with it is so easy!
Robin, are you with me on that one?
Antoine
Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 November 2001 16:55, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>>Robin Berjon wrote:
>>
>>>On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:27, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>>>
Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart...
Once there is a design that people are satisf
Check out the docs at:
http://stein.cshl.org/WWW/software/CGI/#mod_perl
There's specific notes on how to make CGI.pm play nicely with mod_perl.
--
===
"If you put three drops of poison into a 100 percent pure Java, you ge
Hi,
I just found that one of our Perl scripts used CORE::exit, I changed that
and found a whole bunch of problems. The biggest one is, that
Apache::PerlRun doesn't seem to like prototypes. It runs the script some
times but will eventually fail with
[Wed Nov 14 17:05:00 2001] [error] PerlRun: `[W
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 16:55, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Robin Berjon wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:27, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> >>Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart...
> >>
> >>Once there is a design that people are satisfied with, you are more than
> >>
here is a list of install procedures ive used for getting these all
going
http://drfrog.fdns.net/x3d/howto.html
Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:27, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
>>>What about an additional requirement:
>>>
>>>The site should be validated sucessfully by validator.w3.org
>>>
>>Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart...
>>
>>Once there is a design tha
> its definitely running under mod_perl. But imho the time it takes to
> create a new cgi-object should not depend too much wheter its running
> under mod_perl or not, cause the CGI-module is loaded before. (In fact
> I load in httpd.conf using PerlModule-Directive)
If it was running under CGI, i
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 03:27, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > What about an additional requirement:
> >
> > The site should be validated sucessfully by validator.w3.org
>
> Maybe we should give the horse a chance to catch up to the cart...
>
> Once there is a design that people are satisfied with
Hi All,
I am expriencing a problem using apache 1.3.20 binary distribution for
win32.
This problem both occurs on Windows98 as well as WindowsNT Server (SP6a).
I also use HTML::Mason 1.25 and the XML::parser.
Inside one of the modules there is an eval block.
In the code executed withing this eva
This rings a bell. I recently had to isntall libxml2-2.45 with
libxslt-1.04 on a solaris box. I remember getting warnings when trying to
install libxslt telling me that the version of libxml was not up to date.
Fix to this involved using the:
" --with-libxml-prefix=[PFX]Specify l
You also need libxml2-devel, same for libxslt. This is covered in the
INSTALL file.
PS: PLEASE! Stop posting in HTML format. It makes it incredibly difficult at
this end.
Matt.
--
<:->Get a smart net
-Original Message-
From: SubbaReddy M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2001
At 08:03 PM 11/14/01 -0800, SubbaReddy M wrote:
Maybe a question for the libxml2 list instead of mod_perl?
So, while installing libxslt-1.0.6
i am getting error atlast, that is " checking for libxml libraries >= 2.4.7... ./configure: xml2-config: command not found "
Did you make install l
I am very sorry to apache mail list, becuase of
posting the not related query.
So, i am epxecting help from successfully work
one.
And Daniel is the author of this, so i am directly
posting him.
I apologise for inconvenience.
I am trying to install XML::LibXML
but for that, first I need
> -Original Message-
> From: Miroslav Madzarevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> PPerl is written in C and from a superficial look at the
> source code I'd say it's not very difficult to understand.
The stub is written in C. That's the point. You need a very fast, light C
stub, because t
PPerl is written in C and from a superficial look at the source code I'd say it's not
very difficult to understand.
If you want a pure perl solution take a look at POE (its being worked on ithreads
these days but can use event
driven fork) or consider writing something yourself. I guess the whol
You need select the option for dso on configuring.
See the docs for your required installation, may help you.
http://perl.apache.org/guide/install.html#Build_mod_perl_as_a_DSO_inside_t
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/dso.html
Currently, i am doing it for Linux 6.2 (Redhat).
Best of luck.
-SubbaR
Hello,
I have a Solaris machine
System Configuration:
OS: SUN Solaris
I have installed Apache ver 1.3.9
I have also installed mod_perl -1.26.
However when I make the mod_perl package I do not get the mod_perl.so file.
Could anyone tell the reason for this?
regards,
Pratiksha
**
I am getting these error messages when I restart apache on a new mod perl
install.
Starting httpd: Subroutine export redefined at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux/Apache/Constants.pm line 35.
Subroutine name redefined at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux/Apache/Constants.pm line
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 09:18:04PM -0500, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > One run of my script takes about 2 seconds. This includes a lot of
> > database-queries, calculations and so on. about 0.3 seconds are used
> > just for one command: $query=new CGI;
>
> That's really awfully slow. Are you posit
46 matches
Mail list logo
