Upscene Productions is proud to announce the availability of
the next version of the popular multi-DBMS development tool:
" Database Workbench 5.2 "
This release includes support for PostgreSQL and adds several other features.
Database Workbench 5 comes in multiple editions with
By default Postgresql database encoding in UTF8.
It seems to me by seeing error that database encoding in mysql is
different from it.
--
Cheers,
Dhaval Jaiswal
On 01/03/2011 3:57 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
Dear all,
I want to convert some tables from Mysql database to Postgresql
2011/3/1 Adarsh Sharma :
> Dear all,
>
> I want to convert some tables from Mysql database to Postgresql Database in
> Linux Systems ( Ubuntu-10.4, CentOS ).
[...]
> invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xe3ba27
> HINT: This error can also happen if the byte
Dear all,
I want to convert some tables from Mysql database to Postgresql Database
in Linux Systems ( Ubuntu-10.4, CentOS ).
Can someone Please tell me tool for it that makes it easier.
I am able to done it through FW tools in Windows System but i want to
achieve it in Linux ( CentOS
2011/2/22 Adarsh Sharma :
> Dear all,
>
> Today I need to back up a mysql database and restore in Postgresql database
> but I don't know how to achieve this accurately.
Have a look at: "mysqldump --compatible=postgresql" command:
<http://dev.mysql.com/do
Dear all,
Today I need to back up a mysql database and restore in Postgresql
database but I don't know how to achieve this accurately.
Can anyone kindly describe me the way to do this.
Thanks & best Regards,
Adarsh Sharma
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archi
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 06:36:02 -0400 (EDT), "Robert P. J. Day"
wrote:
> no, i don't want to start a flame war, i just want some feedback on
> a current list of mysql "drawbacks" WRT postgresql.
>
> in the context of a fully open-source, java based ECM
no, i don't want to start a flame war, i just want some feedback on
a current list of mysql "drawbacks" WRT postgresql.
in the context of a fully open-source, java based ECM product, there
is a FAQ entry that summarizes why the developers would prefer their
users to use postgr
Dear all,
Benetl, a free ETL tool for files using MySQL, is out in version 3.2.
This new version is now supporting Java SE 6 and using memory arguments
for JVM.
You can freely download it at : www.benetl.net
You can learn more about ETL tools at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extract,_transf
Dear all,
Benetl, a free ETL tool for files using postgreSQL and MySQL, is out in
version 3.2.
You can freely download it at : www.benetl.net
This new version is now supporting Java SE 6 and using memory arguments
for JVM.
You can learn more about ETL tools at:
http://en.wikipedia.org
Dear all,
Benetl, a free ETL tool for files using postgreSQL (and now MySQL), is
out in version 3.1.
A small correction has been done to Benetl 3.1.
This is now available online.
You can freely download it at : www.benetl.net
This new version brings the support of long as date.
Benetl will
database should have these requirements:
>> >>
>> >> - The schema for this kind of data consists of several arguments
>> >> -latitude,
>> >> longitude, time, speed. etc-, none of them is a text field.
>> >> - The database also should create
sophisticated box - about 3 yr old, 2Mbytes RAM.
- Miles
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:53:45 -0700
> Subject: Performance Spamassin PostgreSQL vs MySQL
> From: mussa...@csz.com
> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
>
> We are using the PostgreSQL currently to store the Bayes information. It
>
rucks-.
> >> - There won't be more than 86400 * 365 rows per table -one GPS position
> >> every second along one year-.
> >> - There won't be more than 10 simultaneously read-only queries.
> >>
> >> The question is: Which DBMS do you think
At 02:53 PM 3/18/2009, you wrote:
We are using the PostgreSQL currently to store the Bayes information. It
seems to periodically spend a lot of time 'vacumming' which of course
drives up disk load. The system admin has adjusted it so it only does
this at low load. I'm curiou
We are using the PostgreSQL currently to store the Bayes information. It
seems to periodically spend a lot of time 'vacumming' which of course
drives up disk load. The system admin has adjusted it so it only does
this at low load. I'm curious if anyone has actually tested th
ry second along one year-.
>> - There won't be more than 10 simultaneously read-only queries.
>>
>> The question is: Which DBMS do you think is the best for this kind of
>> application? PostgreSQL or MySQL?
>
> I think it depends on exactly what you want to do with t
one GPS position
> every second along one year-.
> - There won't be more than 10 simultaneously read-only queries.
>
> The question is: Which DBMS do you think is the best for this kind of
> application? PostgreSQL or MySQL?
I think it depends on exactly what you want to do with the
-.
> - There won't be more than 10 simultaneously read-only queries.
>
> The question is: Which DBMS do you think is the best for this kind of
> application? PostgreSQL or MySQL?
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Juan Karlos.
>
>
> __
stion is: Which DBMS do you think is the best for this kind of
application? PostgreSQL or MySQL?
Thanks in advance
Juan Karlos.
PostgreSQL Conference East is being held at historic Drexel University
on April 3rd through 5th 2009 . This is the second call for papers. The
call for papers ends Feb 23rd and speakers will be notified on the 27th.
You may submit your talk here: http://www.postgresqlconference.org . We
are
Hello,
The talk I gave at MySQCon on this topic is here:
http://www.commandprompt.com/blogs/joshua_drake/2008/04/what_mysql_and_really_sun_can_learn_from_postgresql/
It was an interesting experience. Thanks for the help you guys gave me
via this list and direct email to accomplish the task.
Hello,
I know this is a *little* off topic but it is about Open Source
databases :)
There are only three weeks left to register for the PostgreSQL
Community Conference: East!
The conference is scheduled on March 29th and 30th (a Saturday and
Sunday) at the University of Maryland. Come join us
Hi,
We are developing a Java EE 5 based system in which we run our system using
MySQL on our local test workstation machines. Each night our project is built
and deployed on our test server, which is using PostgreSQL, it's the database
we will be using in our production environment as
At 11:57 AM 1/15/2008, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am an unabashed PostgreSQL user. However i am giving a talk on
MySQL/PostgreSQL shortly. I would like to know from a MySQL user
perspective what MySQL has over PostgreSQL, why is it good? Why would
use use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am an unabashed PostgreSQL user. However i am giving a talk on
MySQL/PostgreSQL shortly. I would like to know from a MySQL user
perspective what MySQL has over PostgreSQL, why is it good? Why would
use use MySQL versus PostgreSQL? Any
er into MySQL's partitioning.
Cheers
- Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 27 July 2007 6:44 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Data Warehousing and MySQL vs PostgreSQL
On 7/26/07, Andrew Armstrong wrote:
> * Table 1: 8
s
are going to cross all partitions partitioning is not going to help
you much, if your queries typically only touch one partition it will
help a lot.
> I am a bit hesitant however to go with PostgreSQL because the partitioning
> system seems a bit less easier to work with than MySQL (5.1's)
&g
007 10:23 AM
To: Andrew Armstrong
Cc: 'Wallace Reis'; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Data Warehousing and MySQL vs PostgreSQL
Wallace is right, Data Warehousing shouldn't delete any data. MySQL
isn't as robust as say, Oracle, for partitioning so you need to fudge
thing
after a week, etc.
I'm more concerned as to why inserts begin to slow down so much due
to the
large table size.
-Original Message-
From: Wallace Reis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 27 July 2007 1:02 AM
To: Andrew Armstrong
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Data War
I'm more concerned as to why inserts begin to slow down so much due to the
large table size.
-Original Message-
From: Wallace Reis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 27 July 2007 1:02 AM
To: Andrew Armstrong
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Data Warehousing and MySQL vs
On 7/26/07, Andrew Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have a suggestion to how this should be implemented?
Data is aggregated over time and summary rows are created.
I think that you didnt design correctly your DW.
It should have just one very larger table (the fact table).
Data should
Warehousing and MySQL vs PostgreSQL
On 7/26/07, Andrew Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Information is deleted from this DW as well, after every five minutes.
> The data being recorded is time sensitive. As data ages, it may be
deleted.
> Groups of samples are aggrega
On 7/26/07, Andrew Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Information is deleted from this DW as well, after every five minutes.
The data being recorded is time sensitive. As data ages, it may be deleted.
Groups of samples are aggregated into a summary/aggregation sample prior to
being deleted.
I
: Re: Data Warehousing and MySQL vs PostgreSQL
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 18:37 +1000, Andrew Armstrong wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am seeking information on best practices with regards to Data
Warehousing
> and MySQL. I am considering moving to PostgreSQL.
> * Table 1: 80,
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 18:37 +1000, Andrew Armstrong wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am seeking information on best practices with regards to Data Warehousing
> and MySQL. I am considering moving to PostgreSQL.
> * Table 1: 80,000,000 rows - 9.5 GB
> * Table 2: 1,0
Hello,
I am seeking information on best practices with regards to Data Warehousing
and MySQL. I am considering moving to PostgreSQL.
I am currently using MySQL as the database of choice. I am now running into
performance issues with regards to large tables.
At the moment, I have the
Rewriting PostgreSQL in another language - from "C" to SmartEiffel
PostgreSQL is very stable, mature and fully grown up and is in
spectacular shape.
But what will the developers do next ? Will they run out of work?
No!!
We can give them more work to do. We can keep them very bus
If you used TOAD in oracle, DBBrowser is similar to that.
Developers need a tool like DBBrowser to work with SQL database.
DBBrowser is excellent tool and is quite useful for developers.
DBBrowser is released under gnu/gpl license.
DBBrowser is quite impressive and in future it will find rapid
ado
http://linux.inet.hr/poll_favorite_database.html
I don't think so. Do something!
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris White wrote:
On Sunday 02 July 2006 12:22 pm, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
I have very little knowledge of either PostgreeSQL or mySQL. Please advise
me as to which of these two software package to use? I need some specific
examples as to superiority of one package over the other. I prefer usi
Chris White wrote:
On Sunday 02 July 2006 12:22 pm, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
I have very little knowledge of either PostgreeSQL or mySQL. Please advise
me as to which of these two software package to use? I need some specific
examples as to superiority of one package over the other. I prefer using
On Sunday 02 July 2006 12:22 pm, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
> I have very little knowledge of either PostgreeSQL or mySQL. Please advise
> me as to which of these two software package to use? I need some specific
> examples as to superiority of one package over the other. I prefer using
> the package wh
Hello List:
I hope my question does not start war of the posts. This question is
genuine. Please answer objectively:
I am test setting a Master Server (MS) with CentOS 4.3, freeRADIUS, DNS,
Apache, (mySQL & PostgreeSQL), PHP, Postfix, etc. This Master Server will
have all the software I we
World-Wide public announcement (every human animal on this planet
must read this announcement) :
The top RDBMS SQL systems are:
Number one: PostgreSQL
Number two: FireBird and MySQL.
Now, which are the top computer languages which you would use to
interface with these SQL servers??
You
PostgreSQL is becoming the World's Financial Capital !!
All the banks in the world are ordered to change their operations to
run on open-source databases like PostgreSQL, MySQL or FireBird.
It means all the banks in 200 countries in the world run on open
source db system.
The heart of the
is there other ways of doing this?
tia,
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 20:33, Gleb Paharenko wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> Have a look here:
> http://solutions.mysql.com/technology/technology/?item=425
>
> SQLPorter supports Postgres according to this page.
>
> JM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
Hello.
Have a look here:
http://solutions.mysql.com/technology/technology/?item=425
SQLPorter supports Postgres according to this page.
JM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all,
>is there a howto on this? or an application for this?
>
> tia,
>
--
For technical sup
hi all,
is there a howto on this? or an application for this?
tia,
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As previously posted to this list.
http://www.fabalabs.org/research/papers/FabalabsResearchPaper-OSDBMS-Eval.pdf
On 6/24/05, stone.wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do you think about PostgreSQL and mysql? want to know which is good? How
> to choose database for the web?
--
M
Félix Beltrán wrote:
> Does any one know how PostgreSQL compares to MySQL regarding stability
> and maintenance?
>
> I have been using MySQL for about two years, and it has proved to be
> very stable and requires almost zero maintenance.
It really depends on what you a
Does any one know how PostgreSQL compares to MySQL regarding stability
and maintenance?
I have been using MySQL for about two years, and it has proved to be
very stable and requires almost zero maintenance.
FB
> Hi Stony,
>
> I didn't use PostgreSQL before, so couldn't
Hi Stone,
if you ask me which is bettet your car or mine, i'll answer mine.
Your question can't be answered here because it's not technical but political.
Better close this thread.
Mathias
Selon "stone.wang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How do you think about Postgr
My choice was based on the fact that web requires a high number of reads
and normally far fewer writes. The speed of MySQL in read is very fast
compared to PostgreSQL. Where it comes to accounting, high transactions
and such applications I will continue to use PostgreSQL till MySQLv5
becommes
Hi Stony,
I didn't use PostgreSQL before, so couldn't comment. For MySQL, you have
to beware of the following:
- Store procedure, views, triggers is supported only in version 5, which
is still in development phase.
- clustering / failover feature is only out for about 9 mont
How do you think about PostgreSQL and mysql? want to know which is good? How to
choose database for the web?
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:49:38 +0900
ninjajs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you think about MySQL vs PostgreSQL ?
Both are great products and have their ups and downs. On a MySQL list
you will not get an un-biases answer to this question.
If you really want to know what peop
, 15 March 2005 8:20 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: MySQL vs PostgreSQL
Hi,
What do you think about MySQL vs PostgreSQL ?
Thanks.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MySQL Gen
Hi,
What do you think about MySQL vs PostgreSQL ?
Thanks.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello.
You should search in archives for such questions. For example see
threads at:
http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/160972
http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/170673
"shabanip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
> just want to know the main benefits of mysql over
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:43:50PM +0100, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Don't you think it is childish to link to documentation from 2003?
I've never seen a child do anything like you describe.
-Rich
--
Rich Lafferty --+
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:21:26 -0600, mos wrote:
>
> http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.mysql.com/doc/en/MySQL-PostgreSQL_features.html
There is a reason this page was removed from the MySQL site: some of
it was never correct in the first place, and the rest was severly
outdated.
Don't you thi
At 05:45 PM 2/24/2005, you wrote:
hi,
just want to know the main benefits of mysql over postgresql.
thanks,
Payam Shabanian
Payam,
The differences between the products are narrowing, especially
with MySQL 5.0 which is still in beta. If I could sum it up in 1 sentence
then MySQL is
hi,
just want to know the main benefits of mysql over postgresql.
thanks,
Payam Shabanian
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> now I managed to dump table schema with pg_dump. However,
> is there any schema converting tool available? I don't want to edit
> each table schema to make it mysql-compliant.
Download yourself a trial of Database Workbench
at www.upscene.com
It has a "Schema Migrator" tool that allows you to
18 Oct 2004 18:08:24 +0800, èææ Patrick Hsieh wrote:
> >
> > I am planing to transfer data from postgresql to mysql. Is there any
> > useful tools, scripts or utilities to achieve this?
>
> pg_dump
>
> First dump the schema, edit that until you have something MySQL
t; Patrick Hsieh wrote:
> >
> > I am planing to transfer data from postgresql to
> mysql. Is there any
> > useful tools, scripts or utilities to achieve
> this?
>
> pg_dump
>
> First dump the schema, edit that until you have
> something MySQL
> unders
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:08:24 +0800, èææ Patrick Hsieh wrote:
>
> I am planing to transfer data from postgresql to mysql. Is there any
> useful tools, scripts or utilities to achieve this?
pg_dump
First dump the schema, edit that until you have something MySQL
understands. Then dump
Hello list,
I am planing to transfer data from postgresql to mysql. Is there any
useful tools, scripts or utilities to achieve this? Any infomation is
highly appreciated!
---
Patrick Hsieh(èææ) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ: 97133580
Skype: pahud_at_pahud.net
> -w, --where=nameDump only selected records; QUOTES mandatory!
>
> :)
The more options the merrier for MySQL and the end-users :)
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"SciBit MySQL Team" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> select * from accounts; -- as an example
>
> but because you can customize the source sql script for MyRun, you can go like:
>
> select * from accounts where AccountDate>YEAR(CURDATE()); --
>
> i.e. limit the inserts you going to get to that whic
> Great, MyCon produces "SQL statements ready to recreate just your schema and/or all
> data as well", now did I miss something, or does MyCon actually write the SQL one
> needs to create and populate a set of system tables for the schema?
>
> PB
> .
Nope Peter, you didn't miss a beat ;)
Jus
> mysqldump --no-data --all-databases
>
>
> Eamon Daly
Yeap Eamon, as mentioned MyRun is not the only utility on earth with the
functionality. The difference between mysqldump and MyRun is that while MyRun
includes all the mysqldump
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 4:34 PM
Subject: RE: Re: [OT] PostgreSQL / MySQL Data Dictionary
> > In MySQL, by parsing the output of SHOW CREATE TABLE.
> >
> > It would be a boon if someone were to write a utility,
> In MySQL, by parsing the output of SHOW CREATE TABLE.
>
> It would be a boon if someone were to write a utility, in an OS-independent
> language, which does that parsing for all tables in a MySQL database and
> returns SQL output that's suitable for creating a set of system tables.
> Obviously
> SHOW TABLES does not make sense. How are you going to join the
> output of SHOW TABLES against the output of SHOW COLUMNS and
> SHOW INDEXES?
In MySQL, by parsing the output of SHOW CREATE TABLE.
It would be a boon if someone were to write a utility, in an OS-independent
language, which does th
e nice for doing this.
> The MySQL set of "SHOW" commands is pretty painful for any serious development.
>
> Does PostgreSQL have a set of information schema tables to query against like Oracle
> does (e.g. SELECT table_name FROM user_tables)?
It does have a system that is prett
sense.
>
>
> And as for easy remembering: I prefer to remember just one standard,
> instead of the idiosyncracies of each product.
Yes, a queryable (sp?) set of dictionary tables/views would be nice for doing this.
The MySQL set of "SHOW" commands is pretty painful for any
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:00:32 -0500, Josh Trutwin wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:34:49 +0200 Jochem van Dieten wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:00:12 -0500, Josh Trutwin wrote:
>>>
>>> MySQL's command line interface and programming API also are nicer
>>> for newer users. Why in the world do I need
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:34:49 +0200
Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:00:12 -0500, Josh Trutwin wrote:
> >
> > One area where MySQL beat Postgres is in Windows installation.
> > Installing postgres on Windohs is like pulling your fingernails
> > off slowly.
>
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:40:39 +0200
Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:49:26 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, since you admitted to being a newbie, I would suggest that
> > you learn with MySQL. It supports several types of data stor
1 2004-10-10 NULL NULL
Generally in results values repeate for all records in fields of joined tables except
last joined table, where is NULL.
$ mysql --version
mysql Ver 12.22 Distrib 4.0.18, for pc-linux-gnu (i686)
Same behaviour in :
mysql Ver 12.22 Distrib 4.0.20, for pc-linux-gnu (i3
Foundation or a lawyer as appropriate.
Lachlan
-Original Message-
From: mos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 August 2004 7:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Difference between PostgreSQL and MySQL
At 03:35 PM 8/10/2004, you wrote:
>Hi all, mr.super newbie here, what
At 03:35 PM 8/10/2004, you wrote:
Hi all, mr.super newbie here, what is the best for cold fusion development?
I know that NASA uses MySQL but I have also been told that more
'professionals'(???) use PostgreSQL. Let the flaming begin!!
One thing that wasn't mentioned is MySQL req
Thanks Emmett and Martijn!!
- Original Message -
From: "EWAGW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Difference between PostgreSQL and MySQL
> Thank Jochem as well interesting reply got me thinking
&
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:49:26 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, since you admitted to being a newbie, I would suggest that you learn
> with MySQL. It supports several types of data storage (memory only, ISAM,
> full-relational) and both transacted and non-transacted executi
at a time.
> I hear they are close to full Windows support though in the 8.x branch.
The current BETA offers identical features on Windows and Linux. But
don't use beta software in production (neither PostgreSQL nor MySQL).
> MySQL's command line interface and programming API
Thank Jochem as well interesting reply got me thinking
- Original Message -
From: "Jochem van Dieten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Difference between PostgreSQL and MySQL
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2
Thanks a lot Shawn, Josh and Brad for your great advice. The command line
interface you talk about is that in MySQL administrator?
MySQL's command line interface and programming API also are nicer for newer
users. Why in the world do I need to remember to type "\d" to show my
tables?
>
> That
> > No need for flames. I think the two are converging.
>
> One area where MySQL beat Postgres is in Windows installation. Installing
postgres on Windohs is like pulling your fingernails off slowly. I hear
they are close to full Windows support though in the 8.x branch.
>
FYI:
http://archives.p
Subject: Re: Difference between PostgreSQL and MySQL
> Well, since you admitted to being a newbie, I would suggest that you learn
> with MySQL. It supports several types of data storage (memory only, ISAM,
> full-relational) and both transacted and non-transacted execution models.
Ehm
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:45:29 -0400
Brad Tilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No need for flames. I think the two are converging.
One area where MySQL beat Postgres is in Windows installation. Installing postgres on
Windohs is like pulling your fingernails off slowly. I hear they are close to fu
for cold fusion
development?
> I know that NASA uses MySQL but I have also been told that more
> 'professionals'(???) use PostgreSQL. Let the flaming begin!!
>
>
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
L PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: Difference between PostgreSQL and MySQL
> EWAGW wrote:
> > Hi all, mr.super newbie here, what is the best for cold fusion
development?
> > I know that NASA uses MySQL but I have also been told that more
> >
the only consideration, go with PostgreSQL: ColdFusion MX is
Java based and PostgreSQL has a stable release with Unicode support.
But I am sure that in an answer you will give us many more
requirements which may or may not change my recommendation :)
Jochem
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archi
EWAGW wrote:
Hi all, mr.super newbie here, what is the best for cold fusion development?
I know that NASA uses MySQL but I have also been told that more
'professionals'(???) use PostgreSQL. Let the flaming begin!!
No need for flames. I think the two are converging.
PostgreSQL started
Hi all, mr.super newbie here, what is the best for cold fusion development?
I know that NASA uses MySQL but I have also been told that more
'professionals'(???) use PostgreSQL. Let the flaming begin!!
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To u
ics.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Braithwaite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 May 2004 14:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Running MySQL and PostgreSQL on the same hardware
Thanks Kevin,
I am comfortable with the software installs etc.. I was more concerned
with hardware bottlenec
10:53
To: Andrew Braithwaite; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Running MySQL and PostgreSQL on the same hardware
Andrew
I've done it but only in a test environment. I actually had 3 different
versions of Mysql running plus Postgres.
Each of the Mysql's and Postgress were installed to
/op
or over a
month.
Kevin Cowley
R&D
Tel: 0118 902 9099 (direct line)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.alchemetrics.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Braithwaite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 May 2004 10:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Running MySQL and PostgreSQL o
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo