: Re: [newbie] Performance issues with Mandrake 8
On Monday 21 May 2001 14:11, you wrote:
Irv wrote:
From: Pelle Poluha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Performance issues with Mandrake 8
Hello!
I'm working as a developer and needs a stable environment to develop
and test
On Monday 21 May 2001 14:11, you wrote:
Irv wrote:
From: Pelle Poluha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Performance issues with Mandrake 8
Hello!
I'm working as a developer and needs a stable environment to develop
and test deployments in. So I want to switch from Windows
just 2 more cents
i have mdk8 on a PI / 150MHz and it doesn't run as slow as some of the reports i have
seen here. it isn't fast by any means, but considering the speed of that system (and
it's age) i'm happy with the performance.
Adrian Smith
'de telepone dude
Telecom Dept.
x 7042
it for you. I am using and IBM 7200 RPM ATA 100 hard
drive and I'm not getting the performance I should
from it yet.
TC
--- Civileme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 21 May 2001 08:01, Irv wrote:
From: Pelle Poluha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Performance issues
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 13:31, Irv Mullins wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2001, you wrote:
Please let us know as soon as you have the disk
optimizer available for testing, I'll be happy to test
it for you. I am using and IBM 7200 RPM ATA 100 hard
drive and I'm not getting the performance I should
Poluha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Performance issues with
Mandrake
8
Hello!
I'm working as a developer and needs a
stable
environment to develop and
test deployments in. So I want to switch
from
Windows. I need
On Monday 21 May 2001 08:01, Irv wrote:
From: Pelle Poluha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Performance issues with Mandrake 8
Hello!
I'm working as a developer and needs a stable environment to develop and
test deployments in. So I want to switch from Windows. I need stability
On Monday 21 May 2001 23:42, you wrote:
I have three machines, running 7.2 and kde 2
One is a P2450 with 128mb ram, and it flies with kde2
the other, is a P200mmx with 64 mb of ram,,, this one is a gateway system
but I put kde2 on it anyway, and I'd have to say that one isn't even that
wrote:
From: Pelle Poluha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Performance issues with Mandrake
8
Hello!
I'm working as a developer and needs a stable
environment to develop and
test deployments in. So I want to switch from
Windows. I need stability
but
at the same
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Irv
Sent: Tuesday, 22 May 2001 9:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Performance issues with Mandrake 8
On Monday 21 May 2001 23:42, you wrote:
I have three machines, running 7.2 and kde 2
One is a P2450 with 128mb
On Tue, 22 May 2001, you wrote:
Please let us know as soon as you have the disk
optimizer available for testing, I'll be happy to test
it for you. I am using and IBM 7200 RPM ATA 100 hard
drive and I'm not getting the performance I should
from it yet.
TC
I wonder if the new kernel is
hdparm -Tt /dev/hda or whatever
--- Irv Mullins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2001, you wrote:
Please let us know as soon as you have the disk
optimizer available for testing, I'll be happy to
test
it for you. I am using and IBM 7200 RPM ATA 100
hard
drive and I'm not
it for you. I am using and IBM 7200 RPM ATA 100 hard
drive and I'm not getting the performance I should
from it yet.
TC
--- Civileme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 21 May 2001 08:01, Irv wrote:
From: Pelle Poluha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Performance issues
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 13:23, you wrote:
hdparm -Tt /dev/hda or whatever
Thanks - I ran that on the 8 gig disk I use for Mandrake, first with
8.0, then 7.1. Mandrake 8.0 scored higher than 7.1 - so, it looks like disk
i/o is not the cause of the dramatic slowdown (going from 7.1 to 8.0),
I'm
These results are not for sure, because right now I'm not sure if I have a
defective promise ultra 66 card or a motherboard that is having a conflict
with the promise card.(abit BF6 motherboard, 20 gig 7200 rpm 100ATA Maxtor
Drive, 30 gig 7200 rpm 100ATA Maxtor Drive, promise ultra 66 pci
Of Tazmun
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 2:31 PM
To: Newbie
Subject: Re: [newbie] Performance issues with Mandrake 8
These results are not for sure, because right now I'm not sure if I have a
defective promise ultra 66 card or a motherboard that is having a conflict
with the promise card.(abit BF6
On Monday 21 May 2001 03:07, Pelle Poluha wrote:
Hello!
I'm working as a developer and needs a stable environment to develop and
test deployments in. So I want to switch from Windows. I need stability but
at the same time I want speed and a practical UI (read GUI). I need a
smooth file
Irv wrote:
From: Pelle Poluha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Performance issues with Mandrake 8
Hello!
I'm working as a developer and needs a stable environment to develop and
test deployments in. So I want to switch from Windows. I need stability
but
at the same time I
: [newbie] Performance issues with Mandrake 8
Irv wrote:
From: Pelle Poluha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Performance issues with Mandrake 8
Hello!
I'm working as a developer and needs a stable environment to develop and
test deployments in. So I want to switch from Windows. I need
Hi all,
Do you guys remember the big hubub when MicroSnot released figures that
proved that NT server outperformed redhat in file serving, web serving and
some other stuff on high end servers??
Does anyone know if tests have been done comparing things now that the 2.4.4
kernel (or just 2.4)and
On Sunday 28 January 2001 21:15, you wrote:
I am new to linux. i have mandrake 7.2.
it runs slowlike a p166 in win98!!!
I have a p2 333 with 256mb ram (mem is reported correctly in mandrake)
I have a 243mb swap partition that seems never got get used by the system.
using kde 2.
what
Well if you're judging based on netscape, then you're in for a
disappointment. That's about right for netscape. Try konqueror or
download opera. How's the rest of the apps?
-s
On Sunday 28 January 2001 08:15 pm, you wrote:
I am new to linux. i have mandrake 7.2.
it runs slowlike a
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sandra Sherrill
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] performance issues
I am new to linux. i have mandrake 7.2.
it runs slowlike a p166 in win98!!!
I have a p2 333 with 256mb ram (mem is reported correctly in mandrake)
I have a
can,
and only resort to Netscape if I must.
BobC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sandra Sherrill
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] performance issues
I am new to linux. i have mandrake 7.2
On Sunday 28 January 2001 02:15 pm, Sandra Sherrill wrote:
I am new to linux. i have mandrake 7.2.
it runs slowlike a p166 in win98!!!
I have a p2 333 with 256mb ram (mem is reported correctly in mandrake)
I have a 243mb swap partition that seems never got get used by the
system. using
On Sunday 28 January 2001 14:15, you wrote:
I am new to linux. i have mandrake 7.2.
it runs slowlike a p166 in win98!!!
I have a p2 333 with 256mb ram (mem is reported correctly in mandrake)
I have a 243mb swap partition that seems never got get used by the system.
using kde 2.
what
On Wednesday 29 November 2000 14:02, you wrote:
I am running v7.2 on a 433 Mhz Celeron with 192 MB of RAM
which I recently upgraded from 64 MB. There is an increase in
performance, but not major. It is recognizing the RAM. Is there
any configuring that I can do to increase
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike,
I tried Blackbox, but I can't get the "feel" for it as I do with xfce. To
each his/her own, right?
There's more than one way to do it. The linux way :)
Paul
===
Hey Paul,
I couldn't agree more :o) That's one of the genuine
, November 29, 2000 12:25 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [newbie] Performance...
IMO, Your system no doubt seems slower since you have such a beast at work.
I have a 21" monitor here, when I go home to my paltry 17" it feels like I'm
looking at a 15"... ;-)
My Celeron 400i
rom: "Dave Sherman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 29, 2000 9:00:12 PM GMT
Subject: Re: [newbie] Performance...
There is another possible issue: incorrect (or sub-optimal) choice of X
display driver. I have an IBM ThinkPad i1400 series, 366MHz Celeron, 64MB
RA
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, you wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Mark Johnson wrote:
I'm running 7.2 KDE on a PII400/288MB and it's a slow as crap!
Especially while running with a terminal window, Netscape, Pan, and XMMS.
KDE kills the performance. I use xfce, and things go very fast. 128Mb ram
and the
rolling on the floor
i hope u dont mind if i include this little joke in fiction writing :)
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Primavera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 11:50 AM
To: Newbie List; Expert List
Subject: [newbie] Performance...
Hello
Was your monitor listed as a standard monitor in X or did you have to make
it up yourself? I'm having a similar problem with a Toshiba Laptop.
--Original Message--
From: "Dave Sherman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 29, 2000 9:00:12 PM GMT
Subject: R
ubject: RE: [newbie] Performance...
IMO, Your system no doubt seems slower since you have such a beast at work.
I have a 21" monitor here, when I go home to my paltry 17" it feels like
I'm looking at a 15"... ;-)
My Celeron 400i w/ 64MB RAM seems to run MDK7.2 and KDE2 just fin
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Mark Johnson wrote:
I'm running 7.2 KDE on a PII400/288MB and it's a slow as crap!
Especially while running with a terminal window, Netscape, Pan, and XMMS.
KDE kills the performance. I use xfce, and things go very fast. 128Mb ram
and
On 29 Nov 2000, Michael Scottaline wrote:
KDE kills the performance. I use xfce, and things go very fast. 128Mb ram
and the same processor. 3 netscapes, xmms, Pan, 5 rxvt's (terminals),
wordperfect, burning a cd, all at once, no problem.
Paul
xfce looks rather nice. but
Hello,
I am running v7.2 on a 433 Mhz Celeron with 192 MB of RAM which I recently
upgraded from 64 MB. There is an increase in performance, but not major. It
is recognizing the RAM. Is there any configuring that I can do to increase
performance?
Thank You,
Vincent
]]
Sent: 03 April 2000 05:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Performance differences
Oh, and while I'm at it. Truth be told, I've only read messages that
seemed pertinent, and dumped all the rest. So another question:
Why does Mandrake 7.0 (Linux in general?) seem to run slower
than
Oh, and while I'm at it. Truth be told, I've only read messages that
seemed pertinent, and dumped all the rest. So another question:
Why does Mandrake 7.0 (Linux in general?) seem to run slower
than Windows95 when running the same application? That is, why
does a video file run some much
39 matches
Mail list logo
