Hello,
It's just for testing ...
Bye.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
Hi, sorry for my late reply.
Andreas, The current eGK contains fully crypto functionality such as
decryption and signing. But the card is still in development and this
version will not be identical to the distributed one. Nevertheless
interface modifications may be few.
Alon, how to start openct
/etc/init.d/openct start seems to be right but has no effect. The same
messages appear as posted before.
Alon Bar-Lev schrieb:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Stefan X stefa...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi, sorry for my late reply.
Andreas, The current eGK contains fully crypto functionality such as
I guess you need to start openct init script.
On 1/23/09, Stefan X stefa...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi!
Right now I tried the current German health card (eGK) with opensc but
it failed unfortunately. I am not a developer and have no experience
with OpenSC. Nevertheless I would like to support
Hello All,
I modified OpenCT-CCID to enable event handling instead of polling.
I will appreciate anyone (also if not using ccid) can provide some feedback.
Sources are available at [1].
Thank you,
Alon Bar-Lev.
[1]
http://www.opensc-project.org/svn/openct/branches/alonbl/usb-ccid-reduce-busy
Hi Stanislav,
acos5: there is no working driver, only some WIP that stalled many months ago.
gemxpresso: that card isn't supported at all, as far as I know.
oberthur: The oberthur driver supports Oberthur 64k Java-cards in the
Versions v4/2.1.1, v5 and v5/2.2.0 and CosmopolIC v5.2/2.2, that
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
oberthur: The oberthur driver supports Oberthur 64k Java-cards in the
Versions v4/2.1.1, v5 and v5/2.2.0 and CosmopolIC v5.2/2.2, that contains
applet AuthentIC. (pasted from our wiki)
so only very special oberthur cards with only those special applets are
Strange!
Which version of autoconf/automake/libtool do you use?
I use:
sys-devel/autoconf-2.61
sys-devel/automake-1.10
sys-devel/libtool-1.5.26
And:
$ autoreconf -i -v -f
On 3/18/08, Jan Just Keijser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alon,
I've downloaded [1], [2] and [3]; I tried to run
Hi Alon,
success!
I have
- reinstalled msys 1.0.11 + mingw 5.1.3
- added the openssl, zlib and libtool packages from the mingw.org site
- exported all required env vars ({OPENSSL,LTDL,ZLIB}_{CFLAGS,LIBS}
- ran ./configure + make
and the thing just built :-)
The resulting pkcs11-tool.exe can even
On 2/27/08, Douglas E. Engert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to build the off the SVN source using msys and mingw and
have some questions.
Thanks for trying!
I need OpenSSL and Zlib and ltdl (until you change the code) and would
like to use the versions that were built for Windows
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 2/27/08, Douglas E. Engert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to build the off the SVN source using msys and mingw and
have some questions.
Thanks for trying!
I need OpenSSL and Zlib and ltdl (until you change the code) and would
like to use the versions
On 2/27/08, Douglas E. Engert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PIV cards are being issued with compressed certificates, and so they need
to be decompressed. (Its in the NIST-800-73 specs, I don't think they
gain much be compressing ASN.1, but that is out of my control.)
I've created a binary bundle
Hi Alon,
finally had some time to test your new build system on my Windows XP box
with both Cygwin and MingW installed.
./configure + make ran fine on cygwin; the resulting pkcs11-tool (which
is all I really use) was working fine
./configure ran on MingW after I added libtool to my MingW
Hello,
Thank you for testing!
The pkcs15-piv.c should not have included openssl... I guess this is
leftover from some other work.
Can you please try to remove these includes and continue building?
Alon.
On 2/25/08, Jan Just Keijser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alon,
finally had some time to
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for testing!
The pkcs15-piv.c should not have included openssl... I guess this is
leftover from some other work.
No that is not left over, but maybe it should have been ifdefed.
The PIV is for the new card the U.S. government is issuing to most
On 2/25/08, Douglas E. Engert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No that is not left over, but maybe it should have been ifdefed.
The PIV is for the new card the U.S. government is issuing to most
government employees and contractors.
The leftover is the #include directives.
Alon.
Hi Alon!
On Feb 13, 2008, at 10:09 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
I've been working on a new build system for OpenSC.
Cool! This has needed attention for a while now.
Please provide feedback or review branch [4], so I can request merge.
I've not yet had the time to test it on a Debian box but I'll try
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. openct, pcsc and nsplugins features are disabled by default.
I don't think it's a good idea to by default disable most used reader
interfaces by default, as I'd expect most software to behave nicely
after a
hi Alon,
sorry for not responding any sooner (I saw your previous plea for
Windows testers) but I won't get around to testing your new MingW builds
until next week. It's definitely on my list, as we are still making
extensive use of (parts of) opensc with our Aladdin eTokens (and with
the
On 2/6/08, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:00:48PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
well, itis more about which libraries the dll depends on. don't
know too much about mingw, and if they are 99.9% compatible or
100%.
100%
Yep. MinGW is a full win32 gcc, so
On 2/4/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
If you are Windows OpenSC user, I need your help!
I've modified the OpenSC build to use alternative compiler for
Windows. I need acknowledgment that it works the same as always.
I will be gratefull to receive some feedback!
Hello
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 2/4/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
If you are Windows OpenSC user, I need your help!
I've modified the OpenSC build to use alternative compiler for
Windows. I need acknowledgment that it works the same as always.
I will be gratefull to receive
On 2/4/08, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most important for me would be: can the resultung binary be used with CSPs?
The result binary is a standard PKCS#11... So it should work... :)
BTW: Why didn't you enabled the selection of the PKCS#11 library of
the CSP11 to be configurable
On Feb 5, 2008 9:02 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 13:43:58 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
On 2/4/08, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most important for me would be: can the resultung binary be used with
CSPs?
The result binary is a
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2008 22:29:49 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
Major Changes:
1. Cleanup current build system, (Andreas, I hope you will not be
completely mad). All optional components are disabled now by default,
use --enable-X to enable them if required.
2. Make build system support mingw.
3.
On 2/3/08, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I think about it now, a system_xyz.c file (much like pcsc-lite)
with direct wrappers for win32 api would be a better choice than
'require libtool on windows'.
That would be a reimplementation of libltdl, wouldn't be?
I do not use
OK, builds perfect on StartCom MultiMedia 5 and StartCom Enterprise 5
(RHEL). On ML5 all options are enabled:
Host:i686-pc-linux-gnu
Compiler:gcc
Compiler flags: -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2
Preprocessor flags:
Linker flags:
Libraries:
zlib support:
Actually I didn't knew that there is such a flag now...of course there
is readline, will try it with it next time ;-)
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Thanks!
Do you actually don't have readline? Or is it an error?
Alon.
On 2/3/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, builds
On 2/3/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually I didn't knew that there is such a flag now...of course there is
readline, will try it with it next time ;-)
It should had been autodetected...
Next time, please send me the config.log too, so I know what is wrong.
Alon.
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I think about it now, a system_xyz.c file (much like pcsc-lite)
with direct wrappers for win32 api would be a better choice than
'require libtool on windows'.
I think so too...
Thanks!
___
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that OpenSC and the primary interface (PKCS#11) is
actually executed with system privileges
unless you use it in tandem of some system-privileges software (like
CSP11 for example)
CSP also is loaded into the context of an
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:11 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Using Manifests requires to be more dependent on Microsoft
technologies. Also it has nothing to do with security. A simpler
solution would be to create a new DLL name for each release.
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Yes. I don't want to do this on compile time, but on Runtime, there
must be
some way to get version or some other feedback to distinguished
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Yes. I don't want to do this on compile time, but on Runtime, there
must be
some way
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
I still don't understand why building a working release using MinGW is
a bad idea...
I hope other people can assists in their view.
Generally I support your view, but being also a pragmatist most of the
times, I go with what works best too. Apparently /many/some/ of us
On 2/2/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I get why I don't receive your mails correctly.. You are using HTML mail...
Thanks for the info.
(BTW, Sun, AIX and others do have the gcc compiler so I don't see a problem
here, except that one can build it on Linux)
MinGW
On 2/2/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However if there are enough builders and developers for the MS platform and
it works better with MS compiler etc. then why not? But if nobody maintains
the code within reasonable time, I prefer to rely on MinGW or other OSS
tools.
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 2/2/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I get why I don't receive your mails correctly.. You are using HTML mail...
Well, yes, TB has that feature ;-)
...what's wrong with that?
(BTW, Sun, AIX and others do have the gcc compiler so I don't see
On 2/1/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5. No version and other resources for DLLs and EXEs, it may be added
in future if important.
Finished with this one.
The only noticeable change is the lack of manifests as mingw does not
support these.
Alon.
On 2/2/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only active system I know where pcsc-lite has less arguments is on
Mac OS X Tiger currently. On Linux I believe most up to date
distributions ship with a newer pcsc-lite. There are some but very-
very seldom e-mails to lists or personal
On 2/1/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows binaries are available at [1], source tarball is available at [2].
As far as I know this should work. I need people to test this.
Updated binaries and source are available for testing, include totally
dynamic pcsc support, and resource
Testing the proposed opensc from
http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-0.11.4-svn.tar.gz
Configure works on ML-5 (StartCom MultiMedia) with ./configure
--enable-openct --enable-pcsc-lite --enable-nsplugin, however PCSC isn't
picked up:
OpenSSL support: yes
PC/SC support:
On 2/3/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Testing the proposed opensc from
http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-0.11.4-svn.tar.gz
Configure works on ML-5 (StartCom MultiMedia) with ./configure
--enable-openct --enable-pcsc-lite --enable-nsplugin, however PCSC isn't
Hello All,
It all started as result of OpenSSL incompatibility between an
application and OpenSC PKCS#11 provider.
I quickly learned that OpenSC is built for Windows only using
Microsoft compiler.
Requiring Microsoft compile for free software is somewhat strange... :)
Also, it required OpenSC
On 2/1/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Alon, this sounds like a good deal! So I'm afraid I can't help with
Winedoze and can't voice an opinion on that part...I didn't even knew that
it requires MS compilers ;-)
Thanks!
You can check if the new tarball compiles and
On 2/1/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It took some effort, but at the end I have a test release that uses a
single autoconf/automake/libtool build system for all operating
systems.
Forgot to describe how to build for Windows...
I build using cross compile on Linux to mingw32
On 2/2/08, Douglas E. Engert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? Using the vendor's compiler is common on many platforms,
especially if your code is in the kernel, or is security
related, like OpenSC and runs with operating system privileges.
I disagree completely, and believe the other way around.
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Hello All,
It all started as result of OpenSSL incompatibility between an
application and OpenSC PKCS#11 provider.
I quickly learned that OpenSC is built for Windows only using
Microsoft compiler.
Requiring Microsoft compile for free software is somewhat
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
2. Download latest libtool for win32 [3].
[[[Does someone know why is this used for Windows, I believe a simple
LoadLibrary(), GetProcAddress() should do.]]]
There used to be scdl
Hi!
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:06 AM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Requiring Microsoft compile for free software is somewhat
strange... :)
Why? Using the vendor's compiler is common on many platforms,
especially if your code is in the kernel, or is security
related, like OpenSC
Hi.
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Ludovic, I need some help in reader-pcsc:
1. How can I detect if SCardControl is old or new? I am sure I can do
this by detecting some other fact.
Do you mean the number of parameters passed to SCardControl? I believe
you just have to
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:11 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Using Manifests requires to be more dependent on Microsoft
technologies. Also it has nothing to do with security. A simpler
solution would be to create a new DLL name for each release.
Windows is Windows is owned by Microsoft and this is a sad
I updated the opensc server to etch (and the xen0 to edge) over the weekend.
so far everything I tested seems to work. if you notice any problems, please
let me know.
Thanks, Andreas
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
Am Samstag, 13. Mai 2006 21:08 schrieb Juan Carlos Borrás:
Even though I am able to retrieve ATRs using the wbeiuu I wonder if
someone could provide me with a complete assortment of test cases in
order to check driver robustness, stability and (let's face it)
correctness of my code.
with
Dear all,
Even though I am able to retrieve ATRs using the wbeiuu I wonder if
someone could provide me with a complete assortment of test cases in
order to check driver robustness, stability and (let's face it)
correctness of my code.
I've got plenty of smart cards for testing, but I'm gonna play
55 matches
Mail list logo
