hi,
i am using Enterprise 4500.
i cant boot disk0 or 1,2... and when i tried to installa solaris 10 i couldnt .
it said " there is no disk to install solaris on"
i checked the devalias and the it did show 6 disks disk0,disk1
physicaly i have 2 hard disk but i dont know what is the problem
a
Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey,
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 21:44 -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
John, I misunderstood and made the reports available elsewhere
(RSS/XML feed) in addition to here because so many people prefer to
forgo this list; but I see now that you were suggesting posting them
elsewhere
Hey,
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 21:44 -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> John, I misunderstood and made the reports available elsewhere
> (RSS/XML feed) in addition to here because so many people prefer to
> forgo this list; but I see now that you were suggesting posting them
> elsewhere instead of here...
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:44:32PM -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> Also, in another post, John Levon wrote:
>
>== I thought you'd agreed these should go somewhere else than a
>widely-read
>== general opensolaris mailing list...
>
> John, I misunderstood and made the reports available
Glynn Foster wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 13:25 -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
Couple changes I'm going to try with this:
- Doing them semi-monthly instead of bi-weekly. Therefore, the ones
that I'm about to post will cover from 02/19 (picking up where the
last ones left off) to 02/28 (the
The Sun Studio 10 license for OpenSolaris participants allows one to use
the free software for any type of development- whether
OpenSolaris-related or not.
The reason the license is worded the way it is, is b/c:
- Sun Studio 10 was an established fee-based product prior to
OpenSolaris
-
Since I have not seen it show up. I am forwarding Frank's reply.
--- Begin Message ---
[ ... ]
> But metadb reside on non ufs slices so I am guesing the block size refer
> to sector sizes (512 bytes).
>
> Thus one metadb would be 8192 * 512 bytes = 4k?
Yes.
It's all about terminology, and th
That seems broken, but I suppose that's my non-ON point of view, coming
from consolidations where the engineer marks the bug "fix available" when
they submit the fix for code review and "integrated" when they putback to
the master gate. Perhaps ON needs to reconsider how it uses the fields.
(Of
I will back this up from the request sponser POV. In my case an RPE
engineer had already fixed the bug and putback into Nevada. However we
don't require people to update the "fixed" in bugster. The fixed,
committed and integrated fields get updated only when the build closes.
So during
Felix Schulte wrote:
>
> On 3/6/06, Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:09:32PM +0100, Felix Schulte wrote:
> >
> > > We only have Studio 11 installed as it is the only "free" version -
> > > Studio 10 is not free of charge.
> >
> > We've been over this bef
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "Felix Schulte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I asked a simple question and described my problem. Why are you beating me?
>
> You did claim that Studio 10 is not free of charge.
Moreover he is unable to read his email correctly. My original list
posting about the issue s
"Gerard J. Cerchio" wrote:
>
> Hi Frankho,
>
> Has there been any progress or discussion porting FUSE to Solaris?
Well, first I'd like to see FUSE revamped a little bit. Last time I
checked (note: My knowledge is almost a year old so I could be wrong) it
was very difficult to write FUSE servers
Hey,
So we seem to have a couple of initiatives for everything, but I figured
the locations map was fun enough to put it on the genunix wiki -
http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/OpenSolaris_Worldwide
I'm currently manually syncing the images, but hopefully will have that
automated in the futu
* Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-06 15:58]:
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Sam Falkner wrote:
> > Community could be either NFS or DTrace; perhaps it should be independent,
> > since it spans both. I expect both communities to affiliate with the
> > project,
> > if it gets approved.
>
> If it had
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Sam Falkner wrote:
> I have been doing some work on making a DTrace provider for NFSv4. See this
> blog entry for more details:
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/samf?entry=a_dtrace_provider_for_nfs
>
> I would like to make this into an OpenSolaris project. This would al
Hi!
I'm hitting some problems with Solaris guest installations in VMware
(e.g. Solaris being the guest in a VMware VM):
Sometimes the clock is going out-of-sync. I configured "xntpd" to
counteract these issues - but suddenly at one point all hell breaks
loose:
-- snip --
Mar 4 08:41:33 s10
James Carlson wrote:
Having engineers rather than gatekeepers marking bugs as "integrated,"
as Alan describes for non-ON gates, seems broken to me.
Well, it is admittedly for gates with no gatekeepers. When you have
a fraction of the developers ON does, you get by with a fraction of the
ove
I have been doing some work on making a DTrace provider for NFSv4.
See this blog entry for more details:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/samf?entry=a_dtrace_provider_for_nfs
I would like to make this into an OpenSolaris project. This would
allow me to better collaborate with interested pa
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:47:26PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Sanjay Nadkarni wrote:
> >I will back this up from the request sponser POV. In my case an RPE
> >engineer had already fixed the bug and putback into Nevada. However we
> >don't require people to update the "fixed" in bugster.
Keith M Wesolowski writes:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:47:26PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
> > That seems broken, but I suppose that's my non-ON point of view, coming
> > from consolidations where the engineer marks the bug "fix available" when
> > they submit the fix for code review and "in
Sanjay> ... we don't require people to update the "fixed" in bugster. The
Sanjay> fixed, committed and integrated fields get updated only when the build
Sanjay> closes.
Alan> That seems broken, but I suppose that's my non-ON point of view, coming
Alan> from consolidations where the engineer marks
I have noticed that on the SVOSUG page ->
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/os_user_groups/svosug/
That the videos are sometimes hard to follow slide wise
with lighting issues, etc. While I appreciate the videos I
was wondering if PDF files of the slides sets could be posted
there as well?
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:47:26PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> That seems broken, but I suppose that's my non-ON point of view, coming
> from consolidations where the engineer marks the bug "fix available" when
> they submit the fix for code review and "integrated" when they putback to
> the
Sanjay Nadkarni wrote:
I will back this up from the request sponser POV. In my case an RPE
engineer had already fixed the bug and putback into Nevada. However we
don't require people to update the "fixed" in bugster. The fixed,
committed and integrated fields get updated only when the build
Community/project proposal update.
Jim
*COMMUNITY PROPOSALS*
Immigrants Community
* Proposed 10/27/05 by Adam Leventhal
* Community consensus: yes
* CAB vote: approved
* Opening date: TBD
CIFS Community
* Proposed 1/11/06 by Mark Sweeney
* Community consensus: no consensus yet
* CAB vote: no
Thanks, Ashok. I think Stephen has addressed this:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=24014&tstart=0
Jim
Ashok Nair wrote:
Jim,
Can you pls comment on the "wiki" aproach? It will be absolute stunner if we can get
"wiki" the source code, so anyone with some C experience can
Hey,
I wonder if it's worth creating a new list for this, especially if
you've got the process almost automated? Perhaps opensolaris-summaries
or something?
Glynn
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 13:25 -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> Couple changes I'm going to try with this:
>
> - Doing them semi-monthly
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> * For those who are thinking about contributing code, what can we do to
>help you get started? Would more oss-bite-size bugs help?
More oss-bite-size would be nice. I also have a couple of suggestions for
the bug list. One is to make sure the bug s
Hi Frankho,
Has there been any progress or discussion porting FUSE to Solaris?
What filesystem centric list are you refering to?
Thanks
Gerard J. Cerchio
www.circlesoft.com
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
The request-sponsor program has been in place for eight months, and
things are going well. It's great to have 89 contributions offered by 18
community members with 39 putbacks into the ON consolidation so far.
Additionally, there are more than 20 fixes in progress and a few have
generated ARC c
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
Solaris lags considerably in terms of removable media and hotpluggable
device management on the desktop. A detailed problem statement and some
recommendations can be found in the Solaris Desktop Gap Analysis:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/desktop/communities
Coy Hile wrote:
Speaking from experience, there James? :)
Shush, you! I'm sure Mike Sullivan remembers :|
*cough* freeing a kernel buffer with the wrong size
isn't a good thing to do.
cheers,
James C. McPherson
--
Solaris Datapath Engineering
Data Management Group
Sun Microsystems
__
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:31:16PM -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
>
> brandz-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
I thought you'd agreed these should go somewhere else than a widely-read
general opensolaris mailing list :(
john
___
opensola
[Note: This rollup report is for the main list, opensolaris-discuss.
Because this forum doesn't have leaders per se, P-Team members and CAB
members are considered "leaders" for the purposes of this report.]
=
opensolaris-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
===
zfs-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
Threads or announcements originated by leaders during the period:
- None
Size of all threads during period:
Thread size Topic
---
=
tools-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
=
Threads or announcements originated by leaders during the period:
- SCM usage notes; evaluation harness
- Evaluation notes on bzr-0.7
- Evaluation notes on hg-0.8
- Evaluation notes on monotone-0.25
- Reposito
=
smf-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
=
Threads or announcements originated by leaders during the period:
- None
Size of all threads during period:
Thread size Topic
---
=
powerpc-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
=
Threads or announcements originated by leaders during the period:
- Polaris tasks
by Cyril Plisko
- Updated Polaris Task
by Tom Riddle
==
perf-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
Threads or announcements originated by leaders during the period:
- None
Size of all threads during period:
Thread size Topic
---
networking-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
Threads or announcements originated by leaders during the period:
- Packet Filtering Hooks Design Document Review
by darren.reed at sun.com (Darren Reed)
===
=
laptop-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
=
Threads or announcements originated by leaders during the period:
Subject: New version (v0.3) of ipw and iwi wireless drivers
by Andrei Dorofeev
=
dtrace-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
Threads or announcements originated by leaders during the period:
- None
Size of all threads during period:
Thread size Topic
=
desktop-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
=
Threads or announecments originated by leaders during the period:
- None
Size of all threads during period:
Thread size Topic
-
brandz-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
Threads or announcements originated by leaders during the period:
- BrandZ build 33 re-released
by Nils Nieuwejaar
Size of all threads duri
approach-discuss 02/19 - 02/28
Threads or announcements originated by leaders during the period:
- None
Size of all threads during period:
Thread size Topic
--
Hi Steven -
> Problem Two
> --
>
> The idea is to restrict all the above "zone admins" to a single "admin"
> project in the GZ and grant them 10 shares of CPU in this project via
> FSS and /etc/project entries, like so...
>
> admin:100::admin::project.cpu-shares=(privileged,10,none
Couple changes I'm going to try with this:
- Doing them semi-monthly instead of bi-weekly. Therefore, the ones
that I'm about to post will cover from 02/19 (picking up where the
last ones left off) to 02/28 (the last day of Feb). Then the next
batch will cover 03/01 to 03/15, etc...
- Follo
Solaris lags considerably in terms of removable media and hotpluggable
device management on the desktop. A detailed problem statement and some
recommendations can be found in the Solaris Desktop Gap Analysis:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/desktop/communities/jds/roadmap/solaris_gaps
"Felix Schulte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked a simple question and described my problem. Why are you beating me?
You did claim that Studio 10 is not free of charge.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
On 3/6/06, Andy Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there not an OpenSolaris vmware image / pre-built Virtual Machine for
> > Intel architectures available for download yet? All the big Linux
> > distributions have one available at
> >
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:46:39PM +0100, Felix Schulte wrote:
> > 1. Use gcc instead. There are 22 open bugs that affect ON when built
> > with gcc, most of which cause compilation failure and are trivial to
> > fix. Use the gcc 3.4.3 delivered with Solaris Express build 22 or
> > later. I can
On 3/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there not an OpenSolaris vmware image / pre-built Virtual Machine for
> Intel architectures available for download yet? All the big Linux
> distributions have one available at
> http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/ and there are plenty
>On 3/6/06, Jasse Jansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 6, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Felix Schulte wrote:
>>
>> > On 3/6/06, Michael Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> It's recommended that you use Studio 10; perhaps you should try
>> >> that first.
>> >> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/communit
On 3/6/06, Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:09:32PM +0100, Felix Schulte wrote:
>
> > We only have Studio 11 installed as it is the only "free" version -
> > Studio 10 is not free of charge.
>
> We've been over this before on IRC. Studio 10 is free of char
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:09:32PM +0100, Felix Schulte wrote:
> We only have Studio 11 installed as it is the only "free" version -
> Studio 10 is not free of charge.
We've been over this before on IRC. Studio 10 is free of charge. See
the license terms at
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/t
>On 3/6/06, Michael Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's recommended that you use Studio 10; perhaps you should try that first.
>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/sun_studio_tools/
>We only have Studio 11 installed as it is the only "free" version -
>Studio 10 is not free of charge
On 3/6/06, Jasse Jansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Felix Schulte wrote:
>
> > On 3/6/06, Michael Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> It's recommended that you use Studio 10; perhaps you should try
> >> that first.
> >> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/s
On Mar 6, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Felix Schulte wrote:
On 3/6/06, Michael Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's recommended that you use Studio 10; perhaps you should try
that first.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/sun_studio_tools/
We only have Studio 11 installed as it is the only "
Felix Schulte wrote:
On 3/6/06, Michael Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's recommended that you use Studio 10; perhaps you should try that first.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/sun_studio_tools/
We only have Studio 11 installed as it is the only "free" version -
Studio 10 is not
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:53:01AM -0800, Nickolay Dalmatov wrote:
> Does anyone know the answer?
>
> P.S CGL stands for Carrier Grade Linux - an effort to create an open
> architecture for telecom area based om Linux kernel with Carrier Grade
> characteristics .
A quick glance at these speci
On 3/6/06, Michael Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's recommended that you use Studio 10; perhaps you should try that first.
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/sun_studio_tools/
We only have Studio 11 installed as it is the only "free" version -
Studio 10 is not free of charge.
--
Nickolay Dalmatov wrote:
Does anyone know the answer?
P.S CGL stands for Carrier Grade Linux - an effort to create an open
architecture for telecom area based om Linux kernel with Carrier Grade
characteristics .
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 3/6/06, Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The onnv C-team is working to switch to Studio 11. An announcement
> will be made when this happens. Until then, use the recommended
> compiler or be prepared to fix compile-time and runtime errors on your
> own.
Is there already a fixed
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 04:22:51PM +0100, Felix Schulte wrote:
> Is anyone building the kernel with Studio 11? I am having serious
No one who expects it to work is doing so. Use the specifically
provided Studio 10 compiler; others are either known not to work
(Studio 11) or have not been tested
Nickolay Dalmatov wrote:
Hello All,
I got some questions from friends of mine working for telecom. They are asking
HA services are implemented in OpenSolaris...
I think you really mean in Sun's Solaris, in which case here's a good
place to start:
http://www.sun.com/software/solutions/h
It's recommended that you use Studio 10; perhaps you should try that first.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/sun_studio_tools/
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there not an OpenSolaris vmware image / pre-built Virtual Machine for
> Intel architectures available for download yet? All the big Linux
> distributions have one available at
> http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/ and there are plenty of communit
Does anyone know the answer?
P.S CGL stands for Carrier Grade Linux - an effort to create an open
architecture for telecom area based om Linux kernel with Carrier Grade
characteristics .
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
Hello All,
I got some questions from friends of mine working for telecom. They are asking
HA services are implemented in OpenSolaris.
Does amyone have an answer? I am looking forward to hearing from you...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
ope
As yet, Solaris is unable to cap the memory usage of a zone as an container,
only the individual projects/tasks/users from within the zone.
That's correct.
Is the above facility upcoming?
Yes, it is. Both the ability to cap physical memory (memory sets) as
well as the ability to cap virtual
Jeff,
I think it is because of the "Making CRITICAL warning crash" in
gnome session. Please take a look at:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2005-November/msg6.html
and
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-session/gnome-session/main.c?r1=1.70&r2=1.71
So if you run your
maybird1776 wrote:
Schillix 0.5.1 represents an the release of a
OpenSolaris Live-CD distro now based on Sun's Nevada
build 35 and Xorg's X11 6.9.0.
Me too. I fired up Schillix 0.5.1 LiveCD over the weekend on a Thinkpad
T40 with equally good results. (e.g. X worked fine as did DHCP and N
> The build infrastructure is fairly straighforward.
> What's not straightforward,
> is the development process. OpenSolaris process is
> based on the Solaris process,
> you can read about it here:
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/onnv/os_dev_process/
Just a minor clarification - alt
Stephen Hahn posted a good blog entry recently detailing this:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/sch?entry=gates_projects_and_developers_in
complete with pretty graphics. ;-)
cheers,
steve
UNIX admin wrote:
Reading the blogs of Sun folks, one can gather reading between the lines, that
there i
Is there not an OpenSolaris vmware image / pre-built Virtual Machine for
Intel architectures available for download yet? All the big Linux
distributions have one available at
http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/ and there are plenty of community
built ones at http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
The last step (putback) of the last development phase (integration) is
when your project goes into the gate. And if you mess it up, gatekeepers
will kick your butt :)
That's easy to avoid - come work in a consolidation without gatekeepers!
8-)
--
-Alan Cooper
Nils Nieuwejaar wrote:
A "gate" is just a shared source tree. There is a master Solaris gate, and
most projects have one or more gates of their own.
Solaris actually has two main trees: "the gate" and "the clone". All
putbacks are done to the gate and all bringovers are done from the clone.
Th
Artem Kachitchkin wrote:
OpenSolaris process is based on the Solaris process, you can read about it here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/onnv/os_dev_process/
And that page references the ARC -- Architectural Review Committee
(which is currently evolving into the OpenSolaris Syst
Steven Sim wrote:
Gurus;
It has been my impression for some time now that any scripts written to
be CRONned has to be sh shell scripts, like so;
...
This is because the CRON daemon simply shells the scripts using sh and
does not actually fork a seperate shell script process to run the script
Gurus;
It has been my impression for some time now that any scripts written to
be CRONned has to be sh shell scripts, like so;
#!/bin/sh
If the script is based on a shell other than sh, e.g. C shell or Korn
shell, then the appropriate CRON entry should be
* * * * * /usr/bin/ksh
or
* * *
Speaking from experience, there James? :)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Is anyone building the kernel with Studio 11? I am having serious
trouble getting it working as the built fails at many many places.
I tried to build the kernel the following way:
bzcat on-src-20060222.tar.bz2 | tar -xf -
bzcat on-closed-bins-20060222.i386.tar.bz2 | tar -xf -
// edit opensolaris.sh
Steven Sim wrote:
Hello;
Problem One.
---
The idea is simple. Setup multiple zones in a Solaris 10 box (Sparc
based 490), have each individual zone administered by a seperate admin
and make them responsible for the zone.
Leave the GZ untouchable by the zone admins with one e
Hello;
Problem One.
---
The idea is simple. Setup multiple zones in a Solaris 10 box (Sparc
based 490), have each individual zone administered by a seperate admin
and make them responsible for the zone.
Leave the GZ untouchable by the zone admins with one exception.
The only
[ ... ]
> But metadb reside on non ufs slices so I am guesing the block size refer
> to sector sizes (512 bytes).
>
> Thus one metadb would be 8192 * 512 bytes = 4k?
Yes.
It's all about terminology, and there are too many things in storage
management meaning "a piece of data on your medium". Ma
hello Gurus;
In Sun Info Doc 72063, it clearly says that Solaris 9 SVM metadbs are
8192 blocks in size while earlier version of SDS have metadb which are
1034 blocks in size.
I am guessing the incorrect terminology was used?
It should be 8192 sectors and 1034 sectors instead of 8192 blocks a
86 matches
Mail list logo
