- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
Also, if the EOS1v had been a Pentax it wouldn't have been a pro camera
because not a significant number of pro shooters would have used it?
(snip)
If Pentax HAD made the EOS-1v it still wouldn't be a Pentax, because
Hi Bruce,
I recently bought a former version of Tokina AT-X Pro
28-70/2.8. The operation feel is good and it seems sharp
enough for me. It's not plasticky at all, and I have to
admit that it exceeds some (or many) of recent Pentax
lenses in operation feel. It's also good when you focus
Real pros drive medium or large format cars, you know :)
Atvars
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Mark Roberts wrote:
Anyone whose car cost more than $1700 isn't spending nearly as much on
lenses as
they might be...
Unless you really need a pro car...
:-)
- --
-Original Message-
I need to know if anyone out there knows the name of a good piece of
software that stiches pictures together. . .
Hi,
I was looking for the same software some days ago and here is some
links I have found:
PanoramaFactory (shareware, but there is also the free
Doug Brewer writes:
Why does everything have to be adversarial around here?
Because everyone's opinion is different. It's what makes us so interesting :)
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E. (Elec)
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
Why is it that if an adult behaves like a child they lock
Kevin Waterson writes:
Or if you used linux you could use The Gimp
Like Linux itself, it is free
The Gimp is also available for Windows. Personally I think the Win32 GTK
toolkit (which provides the look-n-feel of Gimp) is ugly and slow, but it does
work.
The Windows version is not as
William Robb writes:
In the context of your original post, 60
megabytes of crap is a lot of crap.
What we're basically saying is similar to opening a 1Mb image in Photoshop
and resampling it out to 60Mb. You get more data but not more detail, which is
similar in principle to shooting a
William Robb writes:
I do have a question about film to digital
comparisons. What is the comparative image depth
of film to digital capture? I know the digital
guys talk about 36 bit depth, but how does that
tranlate to the capture depth of a long scale
film such as Portra?
Is 12 bits per
Juan J. Buhler writes:
The H Limited is not a crappy lens though, but a lens specifically
designed to achieve the effects of the power zooming functions with
any K mount camera!
How would you like to try making a coke-bottle lens, and a pepsi-bottle lens,
and tells us which is better? g
Bill Kane writes:
I need to know if anyone out there knows the name of a good piece of
software that stiches pictures together. I think some of them refer to it
as making a panoramic picture . . . .
There's a neat little package available from Hasselblad called Xpan :)
Cheers,
-
Getting back to the original thread:
Artur wrote:
I heard that 28-200 is actually made by Tamron
and the quality of this lens
is very poor.
What exactly do you think is wrong with this lens? The Tamron 28-200 has
been praised by many photography magazines and the Pentax version has the
Mafud asks:
Please explain to us all exactly ~what~ image data is not useful in a well
exposed, 60MB negative?
An unsharp negative will give you less useful data than a tak-sharp one.
There might be no point scanning a soft neg past 2400dpi while a sharp one
will give more and more
A couple of years ago Trevor Wiebe posted that the Pentax flagship was going to be the
LXII. It doesn't seem far fetched anymore in light of the recent interview with the
boss of the camera division. Anyway, Trevor posted a set of specifications and claimed
he had a industry inside friend who
some interesting definitions of professional have been floating down the
list this past week. I admit that I previously wished this thread would die
a quick death but here's another twist:
Looking over the list of prohibited items for a free concert in Centennial
Olympic Park that I plan on
In local.pentax, you wrote:
As always, I'm looking at the shot mostly for pleasure, with just a few
critiques.
And those mild.
If you got what you wanted in the shot, you did well.
If you also found what pleases a few others, you did very well.
Double Helix by Johan Schoone, Netherland
Take an MZ-S with a copy of amateur photographer to show them proof that
it is not professional - Damien days so!
-Original Message-
From: CW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 July 2001 11:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: professional HA!!
some interesting definitions of
Vic wrote:
Pal: you are absolutely right. if Canon or Nikon marketed the MZS it would be
considered brilliant. The perfect backup body for pros looking for a lighter,
professionally built camera with everything they need to get the job done.
pros and amateurs alike would be eating them
Thanks for the comment Nicole. f4 was just a guess, I know I stopped it down
one stop so it would actually be the next click.
Norm
Nicole Vincent wrote:
Norm
That's a very relaxing shot. I think it captures a really peaceful
moment - or at least that's how it comes across to me.
Anyway,
Located just East of Columbus.
They're laying of 900.
Materials should be cheap. :)
Collin
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:05:49 -0500
From: John Mustarde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mark Cassinos Website
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 09:19:23 -0400, you wrote:
Anyone know where
I can purchase
Wm. R. wrote:
Not inclusive enough. We had this discussion
already regarding the LX Gallery. I won't go
anywhere near a theme that requires a particular
piece of equipment to participate in. I am
thinking of raiding the clichéd pictures thread
for ideas though..
You see, I was
- Original Message -
From: David A. Mann
Subject: Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital
Camera
William Robb writes:
I do have a question about film to digital
comparisons. What is the comparative image
depth
of film to digital capture? I know the
digital
guys talk about 36
I agree, actually enjoyed reading Pal's last post.
Norm
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
John F. wrote:
Pål Jensen wrote:
Its not important to me that the MZ-S is a professional camera.
In that case, why on earth are you spending so much time arguing
that *your* definition of professional is the
I think your right. And I think I cropped to much, I'm looking at the
original uncropped print and I have to say in my opinion it's nicer.
Evan
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 7:31 PM
Subject: July
Hi, I have a program that does what you want. It's called MGI Photovista.
I tested some time ago, and I think it worked ok.
I don't remember from where I downloaded it but it has 6.4 MB. Try searching
photovista.exe
HTH
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 06:30:28 -0600, William Robb wrote:
What I would like to know is what sort of
dynamic range in stops (a concept I do
understand) does a CCD chip have? Is it variable
based on software or is it hardware limited?
Based on the ads I've seen for film scanners, it appears
Why, I believe tv ranks it as his favorite lens. I liked it as well, but he's had far
more experience with it.
Doug
At 10:26 PM -07007/26/01, Bruce Dayton wrote, or at least typed:
Mark,
Thanks for the advice. I have to admit, that flare is certainly one of my
concerns. I will also be
Nenad Djurdjevic wrote:
Getting back to the original thread:
Artur wrote:
I heard that 28-200 is actually made by Tamron
and the quality of this lens
is very poor.
What exactly do you think is wrong with this lens? The Tamron 28-200 has
been praised by many photography
Pål Jensen wrote:
Maybe the MZ-S can be considered a 2001 equivalent of the ME Super or perhaps a
fusion of the ME Super and the MX? That is, they may fill a similar role as those
cameras in the future Pentax line-up.
I think that you're right here. Also, it explains my attraction to the
Create a Panorama in PSP? That's easier than doing a screen capture.
Scoot
How do you do that? I couldn't find it in the help files.
Hernán.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
Some months ago I asked to the list for uses of a
backup body. I got several responses (thank you) and,
logically, the most repeated was the obvious meaning
of backup 'to be used when the main body is broken'.
This was the less important aspect for me then
(actually, I wanted to ask for second
Tom C wrote Imagine how boring the list would be if we all agreed with each
other!
Yes, you're right!
Jim (tic)
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated from the sender
The GIMP has been ported to Win32, workjs pretty well there too.
http://www.gimp.org/~tml/gimp/win32//
Mike Y.
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Digital Software
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:40:40 +1000
Scooterman wrote:
Actually I don't need your 'enablement' (curious use
of this word, never heard this way outside the PDML),
I do pretty well myself, look:
1 year ago: A50/2, A28-80/3.5-4.5, Sigma 70-210/4-5.6
Today: A24/2.8 (the most used), A50/1.4, M50/1.7 (it
was so cheap, I couldn't resist), AF 28-70/4 AL
Check out the top deck of this LX on auction
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1259107015
--Mark
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery
Take an MZ-S with a copy of amateur photographer to show them
proof that it is not professional - Damien days so!
Of course a publication with a name such as _Amateur_ Photographer
probably has a vested interested in not calling things professional...
(Is it simply Friday, or is this just
I recently ran across a K2 in bargain condition for $75... couldn't pass
it up, even though I wasn't too sure how well it worked. Though it's
certainly seen better days cosmetically (scratches on the body and the
leather is peeling), it's in working order. The back has a little play in
it when
Thanks, Jeff! I'm working on a website update to feature landscapes shot
in the U.P. last month - should add a little variety to the site.
Forget about the basket weaving and stick with photography - fewer
splinters under the fingernails!
- MCC
At 09:19 AM 7/26/01 -0400, you wrote:
Mark, my
William Robb (for it is he) writes:
already regarding the LX Gallery. I won't go
anywhere near a theme that requires a particular
piece of equipment to participate in. I am
thinking of raiding the clichÈd pictures thread
for ideas though..
William Robb
Having only been on the PDML for a
Hi,
I quite like the idea Bill (I think) floated of having a cliche PUG.
This gives us the opportunity to shoot an unashamedly cliched photo,
if we want ('string of puppies'), or to do something ironic and postmodern
(Jeff Koons' version of 'string of puppies'), or to take a cliche and show
it
Hernan wrote:
I just read this at Boris's site
(http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/extras/K-mount/Kaf.html):
Speaking about multi-segment metering: (...) since algorithm is rather
complex, it is very difficult to judge when it will fail and in which
direction. Hence, it is not advisable to use
Even though it was a strictly non-pro situation, I did have
an interesting response to my honkin' Big Black SuperProgram,
winder, SMCK 45-125 f4 w/ hood from my 85mm f1.9 Spertak wierd
old SunPak 4-AA flash unit last nite. Since today is Friday
I
thanks Collin,
Nice to see that someone else saw the coolness of my Don't
Try This at Home, Kids shot. The way everything just barely
fits so well into the frame is what I really liked about that
one. No cropping, btw - just an ever so slight rotation and
The timing is perfect, boys and girls.
In this week's column, Frank van Riper has a very
funny, slightly sardonic take on the many of the
issues we, myself included, have been endlessly
rehashing this week.
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/essays/vanRiper/index.htm
If the link doesn't
And the 28-80 doesn't even have this problem; you can switch from MF to AF
and back at any point in the focus collar's travel.
An astoudingly good lens for the money; build quality is very high.
I second the heavy sentiment. Big and heavy is exactly what it is. Not a
stealth lens.
-
I have an older, one-touch version of this lens. I think this was the
first version produced, and at least two others were made. I don;t know if
the later ones were available in K Mount or not.
I've been back and forth on this lens. Several times my results have been
less than
Blondes, God Bless 'em!
--- Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even though it was a strictly non-pro situation, I did have
an interesting response to my honkin' Big Black SuperProgram,
winder, SMCK 45-125 f4 w/ hood from my 85mm f1.9 Spertak wierd
old
Hey Cotty,
Thanks for the reading material. I guess my concerns revolve around the
flare control and close focus ability. Something to think about.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27,
Bob Walkden wrote:
Hi,
I quite like the idea Bill (I think) floated of having a cliche PUG.
This gives us the opportunity to shoot an unashamedly cliched photo,
if we want ('string of puppies'), or to do something ironic and postmodern
(Jeff Koons' version of 'string of puppies'), or to
Great article ... and in light of our thread on durability and
disposable cameras:
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/essays/vanRiper/010615.htm
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why should I use a meter? What if the darn thing broke on me
when I was out making a photograph? Then
Hi,
I was taking photos in Ethiopia once with 3 LXs. A German woman came up
to me and asked if I was working for National Geographic, then asked if
I had any spare batteries. She said they'd be bound to fit her camera
because it was the same brand as mine, but she'd run out. She had an
MZ-
Bob Walkden wrote:
... take a cliche and show
it in a new way without any puppies at all.
Sure. Some people will submit photos of their kittens.
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
Tom Rittenhouse mused:
Actually, I understand that film is capable of recording about
10,000 dots per inch. Of course if you scan it at that
resolution you would be scanning individual grains of silver. I
imagine much image data would be lost in moire patterns.
Not at all. Moire patterns
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list, right to me.
2 - You must choose your favorite emulsion (35 and 120/220 allowed. Color
and b
and w)
3 - You must choose ONLY ONE (color print OR slide OR b and w, etc).
4 - You must have personal experience with it.
WINNER by now: Tri-X
Please send the messages to me directly, to not disturb other
members,thanks.
Also, I've not included 110 and digital cameras, just because I started
this
way, and I didn't want to change in the middle of the way.
Also, if you already submited and want to add new items, please put clearly
in
Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Even though it was a strictly non-pro situation, I did have
an interesting response to my honkin' Big Black SuperProgram,
winder, SMCK 45-125 f4 w/ hood from my 85mm f1.9 Spertak wierd
old SunPak 4-AA flash unit last nite. Since
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list exclusively. On-list votes will not be
included.
2 - You must choose Your Favorite Pentax Lens. ONLY ONE. Yes, ONLY ONE.
3 - It must be original, no third-party allowed.
4 - Primes and zooms.
5 - You must specifiy: Tak, Super Tak, SMC Tak,
Bob Walkden wrote:
Anyway, the only things that matter are
good photographer/bad photographer.
And as far as cameras are concerned:
fitness for purpose. Everything else
is just bollocks.
Nonsense, Bob. A well worn Domke bag is essential, and one's cameras
must be black and show a
Nenad Djurdjevic wrote-
Does anybody know anything about this lens? I think
it would be a very interesting lens to use and own.
Also where can I get one? I imagine that it's very
rare.
---
As far as I remember, the construction of this lens is
identical to
Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, geeze, I didn't tell you that I got rid of mine? Yup, traded it
for a Tamron 28-200. Figure I'll never have to change lenses again.
Doug
just kidding
You don't say...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Oh, geeze, I didn't tell you that I got rid of mine? Yup, traded it for a Tamron
28-200. Figure I'll never have to change lenses again.
Doug
just kidding
At 2:22 PM -04007/27/01, Mark Roberts wrote, or at least typed:
Well, I just bit the bullet and spent $919.00 on a used FA*80-200/2.8
Since the sun right outside the frame, I doubt a hood would of helped too
much. I don't know if a hood would help too much with this lens at all, as
hoods for an extreme wide angle don't provide much protection.
Todd
At 10:53 AM 7/27/01 +0930, you wrote:
Allright,
But what would that shot
Hi,
A well worn Domke bag is essential, and one's cameras
must be black and show a reasonable degree of wear, including
brassing. Black painted metal film cans taped to the neck strap are
very helpful, too. One must carry at least two cameras, preferably
three, each with a well-used prime
Hi everybody!
I'm competing for a short film contest on-line, the title of
which is The First Kiss, with a movie in which I took part as
director of photography.
You can see it on
http://www.shortvillage.com/english/Premio/index.htm
The short is Smack, directed by Alessandro de Cristofaro, and
Bob Walkden wrote:
yea, you're right. That John Francis, he'd run backwards in front of
Schumacher's car if he was a real photographer.
Well, at least he could chase it down the track ...
Hey, John ... put on those jogging shorts and Reeboks, grab your 600,
and get movin'
Bob ('I've got a
A special offer to list members only.
For a limited time, you have the once in a lifetime
chance to comment on my PUG entry for July (Penguins,
by Jody Wintringham).
But wait, there's more...
A special limited edition reply for the first 100
customers.
But don't send any money now. I'll bill
Shel Belinkoff declaimed:
A long tele lens is the mark of an amateur as it
indicates a fear of getting close to the action,
Tongue-in-cheek, I know. So, in the same spirit, I offer:
In my line a fear of getting close to the action is the mark
of a seasoned professional. Amateurs will
From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yea, you're right. That John Francis, he'd run backwards in front of
Schumacher's car if he was a real photographer.
Boy, that sure gave me a visual...
Mark
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Dan Scott wrote:
j, waiting for the first you forgot 43 and 77 post.
Hey Juan,
I think you forgot the 31 ...
Ouch.
--
---
Juan J. Buhler | Sr. FX Animator @ PDI | Photos at
- Original Message -
From: Nenad Djurdjevic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT cars (was Re: Which Pentax is Pentax...)
| Getting back to the original thread:
|
| Artur wrote:
|
| I heard that 28-200 is actually made by Tamron
| and the quality of this lens
| is very poor.
|
| What
Hi,
I use exposure compensation with my MZ-7 pretty often. I must say I don't
like matrix metering at all, but have no choice except for mounting my SMC M
50/f2 on, which turns my matrix into center-weighted metering. But since
it's true that one never knows, what the matrix is exactly going to
Hi,
how about this for dumb then:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/asia-pacific/newsid_1456000/1456831.stm
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, July 27, 2001, 9:29:19 PM, you wrote:
The single silliest thing I saw was at Long Beach. This is a
temporary street circuit, so a
martin tammer wrote:
Blondes, God Bless 'em!
Only one was blonde - musta been the leader :^)
actually, all three were friends, happily attached - so no
hanky-panky hopefulness, just fun fotography. One was of the
cameras steal the soul persuasion, but the
Hi,
Thanx. Your right about your cropping suggestion. In fact I couldn't have
decided in what way the photo should be cropped so I put it whole.
Greetz
Artur
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 2:31 AM
Subject:
At 05:12 28/07/01, you wrote:
Hi,
how about this for dumb then:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/asia-pacific/newsid_1456000/1456831.stm
I think I should go back to my old tag line, Danger is nature's way of
eliminating stupid people. I suppose one could always say Only in
Australia..
Thanks for the reading material. I guess my concerns revolve around the
flare control and close focus ability. Something to think about.
Hmm, I must admit that I do *not* use a filter with this lens. I find it
much much better with flare that way. Having said that, if I ever shoot
with sun
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Jon Hope wrote:
[...]
So the next time you hear of legislation being passed that makes it illegal
to pat your head whilst rubbing your stomach, or something equally as
absurd, think It could only happen in Australia. :-)
It could happen in the US too.
This might as
I was taking photos in Ethiopia once with 3 LXs. A German woman came up
to me and asked if I was working for National Geographic, then asked if
I had any spare batteries.
I was taking photos in Kenya with two MXs. A Kenyan man approached me and
asked me to give one to him, since I had two, so
OK, let's see if this sucker is plain text or not.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , this should please you.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I strongly agree with Pal on this one... this also harkens back to the same
arguments that have been passing through this lists. The biggest complaint
that manual camera users have against auotmated cameras is that it does
everything for you and ppl do not know what the camera is doing. The thing
You know, I'd heard so many horror stories about matrix metering that I'd never
used it until last weekend. Then I found myself needing to get a lot of photos
in a short time in difficult lighting conditions: many subjects in shaded areas
with lots of bright backgrounds and all kinds of
I just sent my LX (bought about 6 mos ago -well worn- off to Colorado for
the CLA to cure the sticky mirror syndrome. My last experience with Pentax
USA was on an old K1000 about 3 years ago, and they acquitted themselves
nicely on that try (if I recall, phone call within 7 days of shipping and
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Suggestion for a PUG
Having only been on the PDML for a couple of
months, has there aver been
a 'self-portrait' themed month? I would have
thought that would be fairly
interesting!
http://pug.komkon.org/00augu/index.html
FWIW, noodling
Ahh, Australia, land of the rugged individual.
Jon Hope wrote:
At 05:12 28/07/01, you wrote:
Hi,
how about this for dumb then:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/asia-pacific/newsid_1456000/1456831.stm
I think I should go back to my old tag line, Danger is nature's way of
Chris Niesmertelny wrote:
Been bouncing around ISP's, too, and trying to figure out how to send plain
text messages on MSN. I guess I failed, so I'm back with Earthlink. Tom V,
thanks again for your help. If I'd seen a note from someone named
??s ??@msn.com, there's no way I would've
Last winter I went shooting lighthouses in the ice with a guy who was
packing a Nikon F-5. We're talking black steel catwalk, red lighthouse,
gray sky, white snow and ice. I shot the Pz-1p in centerweighted mode with
+0.7 stops of exposure compensation, based on a couple of spot meter
LOL, Mark - you are starting to sound like a shrink or something here... ;-)
- MCC
At 04:07 PM 7/26/01 -0400, you wrote:
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've always felt great owning a Pentax.
one would hope...
It's just nice to gloat over the fact that a C user finds it to be
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 22:45:07 -0400
To: Anand DHUPKAR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: snowflakes
It probably depends on you local weather patterns. I live about 35 miles
form lake Michigan and we get a lot of lake effect snow. Usually the
flakes are all
Does anyone know where I can order
the remote shutter release for the
MZ-S?
I did notice that the remote for the
Pentax
90WR "point and shoot" works on the
MZ-S,
but my wife uses that camera and said
I
couldn't have the remote. After buying
the
MZ-S I'm not in a position to be asking
any
Bruce, the Tokina 28-80/2.8 is outstanding. I've tested it extensively and
holds it's own against many primes. Much better than the Tokina 28-70/2.8,
not a bad lens either.
Robert James
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
Mike wrote:
P.S. The MZ-S is one fine camera and worth
a few months of cold beans and hot tongue
from my wife.
That really doesn't sound that bad.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
Seriously, once you start shooting with it, you'll be surprised just how good it is.
John Francis has reported some light fall off at 2.8, and I think he's right, but it's
quite slight. You'd be hard pressed to find any other fault with it. Just don't expect
to do much hand-held Velvia work
Hi Mike,
I don't have a 50/1.4. Would it be ok if I submitted half a shot taken with
a 100/2.8?
Actually, it does make a good excuse for adding a 50/1.4 to my A 50/1.7 and
A 50/2.
Dan Scott (this place sure looks familiar)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike wrote:
I have a suggestion for a PUG. How
William Robb Wrote:
Not inclusive enough. We had this discussion
already regarding the LX Gallery. I won't go
anywhere near a theme that requires a particular
piece of equipment to participate in. I am
thinking of raiding the clichéd pictures thread
for ideas though..
William Robb
When was
Geez,
This would show up in my inbox at the same time my replies to the previous
posts went out.
Dan Scott (I'm not really an idiot, although I play one far too often)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You see, I was thinking didactically again: it would be good for any Pentax
shooter who doesn't own a
Cotty suggests:
Having only been on the PDML for a couple of months, has there aver been
a 'self-portrait' themed month? I would have thought that would be fairly
interesting!
Cheers,
Cotty
I like this theme, too. I'd want to exclude shots of cameras in front of
peoples' faces, though.
Dan
Thankyou for commenting. I agree about the dang fence.
I'm sure it must have jumped into the photo after I
posted it to the PUG. I never even saw it.
Jody.
Penguin Family by Jody Wintringham
Dang fence. Just needs more penguin face.
At 11:56 AM 7/24/01 -0700, you wrote:
The revised format (thanks Chris) will be:
Country:
Theme: (street-urban, nature, landscape, wildlife, etc)
[State or Province:]
[City:]
Location:
Description: (a short description of why this place is worthwhile)
[Related Link:] (a web site with pictures of
Curiouser and curiouser. Where do you think the
desciption comes from? It has a peculiar resemblance
to this one:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewItemitem=1255311711
Different sellers, different locations, and different
LX - I hope. What is going on?
Jody.
--- Mark
It didn't take long.
-Original Message-
From: Creature's Comfort [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:23 PM
To: Pentax List
Subject:Pentax Photos at National Geographic
Here's a fun way to spend some time:
Go to http://www.nationalgeographic.com
The other day I was driving to work and was passed by a truck pulling a trailer like I
see a lot of sheetrock contractors pull--Maybe 5'x8' or so. I was surprised to see
the lettering on the side of the trailer say it was a photographer. He advertised
himself as an event
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
