>> I think I`ve got wrong informations and this lens was made by Pentacon (I
>> think former CZ Dresden).
If it's a 1.8/80, it's _certainly_ made by Carl Zeiss Jena, which was
part of the famous Carl Zeiss before war (and most lenses of CZ were
made there in Jena I think), and later sacked by USSR
Hi, this is mostly for archives, if somebody is asking about
good and cheap and powerful TTL flash in the future he can just read
this so we can concentrate on more important threads like
"Chemical vs. Digital"; Paal/Pel/Pol; What is Pentax ;-)). About an
inexpensive but powerful and very
Hi Richard,
You are right: setting the lens at f/8 and the distance at the
orange value means exactly that.
I think all the Pentax wide angle lens till the F series offer
this kind of indexing. I don't know about the FA, though.
Gianfranco
Richard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just purcha
Count me in!
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 September 2001 18:47
To: Pentax List
Subject: Re: More London eye shots (Re: This moths PUG photos that
workfor me)
>Hey, maybe we could arrange a PDML international Summit in London
>some time?
>
>Tha
Hi! Just some impressions, nothing more :)
I did some test shooting with NPH and I got prints recently. Guys - I'm
surprised about quality. I exposed that film as 320, skin tones went out
very natural, blacks are black with shades, not "black holes", whites are
white, and that altogether in one
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(snip)
> One thing that I hadn't thought of when I bought the lens is
> it's usefulness for action stopping. With the 1/30th second
> shutter duration on the camera, it is possible to get quite a
> lot o
- Original Message -
From: "David A. Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(snip)
> My ideal camera would see a return to separating the motordrive from
the
> body. There are times when small and quiet are paramount.
(snip)
Economics is the cold hard reason for getting rid of the thumb-lever
from
Peter wrote:
> Why don't you do it at a camera show? Then at least I have a chance to
> sell you guys summat.
Where/when are all the UK camera shows these days? 10 years ago when I
last was heavily into photography there was a huge annual event at
Birmingham NEC, a pretty large event held by Fis
I go there a lot, let me know when...
Norm
Rob Brigham wrote:
> Count me in!
>
> Rob
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 06 September 2001 18:47
> To: Pentax List
> Subject: Re: More London eye shots (Re: This moths PUG photos that
> workfor me)
>
> >H
Love the stuff Cameron.
I particularly like 'Lynn Headwaters Landscape 2', the sunset shot (I
luurve sunsets) and the tulips.
However Finn Slough 1 stands out as being rather odd colourwise. I dont
know if the original slide was like this, but a bit of colourwork on the
PC would produce much mo
Hey, someone had to clean up the language
Norm
John Coyle wrote:
> It was only the somewhat demented Mr. Webster who
> decided, quite unilaterally, to alter the spelling of some words in his famous
> dictionary, which was then adopted as standard American spelling.
-
This message is from the
Check this out
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1271902520
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "dim bulb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: lens covers&filters HELP/ CD touch-ups
> Hey listers...
>
> Ap
> -Original Message-
> From: John Coyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Hey Christian, don't start this one again - we had a long
> series on this just
> recently!
> However, I might just remind you that the English language
> originated in
> England (not the Americas), and that part o
Hi,
On 7 Sep 2001, Robert Harris wrote:
> (http://www.icp.org/exhibitions/capa/capa.html) give it as:
> "If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough."
Yes it's correct.
BTW did you know that Capa was Hungarian, and he's real name
was Friedmann Endre?
Gabor
-
This message
Somebody should have pointed them out to him at the time,
instead of waiting until now to do so. :^)
Len
---
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> David A. Mann
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
Am 2001-09-07, 09:18:04, wrote canislupus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Re: CZJ
80/1,8 with K mount?:
> If it indeed is in K mount, please check how does the lens look. (...).
I`ll meet with a seller in four weeks (the beginning of October).
> Now, Gabor, I am going to Hungary this moment! Even here in
... everywhere. :)
Collin
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit th
Dear Artur,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 10:28:35PM +0200, Artur Ledóchowski wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm in desperate need for buying a second body. I have to do it within next
> twoo weeks, after which I'm going out for my vacation to Slovakia. Since I
> want to buy the MZ-S in the near future and I have the
Dont even think about this comparison.
Te 80-320 is beaten comprehensively by the Sigma 70-300 (either DL or
APO - there is some debate over which of the two models is sharpest
though with some saying the DL is better than the more expensive APO).
The 70-200 F2.8 is a whole other ballgame!
Rob
I like the shot of Lee Van Cleef.
Doug
At 4:18 PM -07009/5/01, Juan J. Buhler wrote, or at least typed:
>Last night I was batch scanning some rolls (this is how I do proofs)
>and for a few frames didn't realize that the selection in Silverfast
>was limited to a thin vertical part of the image,
Most labs will charge about $10 to put a roll of film on CD... if the negs
are uncut. I don't think that the lab I go to will even agree to do it if
the negs are cut. Just because he gave you an index sheet does not mean that
he has your pivtures on file...
Nick
--
>From: dim bulb <[EMAI
Sas Gabor wrote:
> BTW did you know that Capa was Hungarian, and he's real name
> was Friedmann Endre?
Sure. Everybody knows that. :)
At one point during WWII he apparently was parachuted into some place in
Europe and wound up n a tree, where he didn't dare call out for help. He
later wrote: "W
Hi,
I wrote:
> > Here in Hungary it's about 14000-2HUF, aprox. 50-70USD.
> > I've seen some above $200 on eBay... Gabor
Frantisek replied:
> Now, Gabor, I am going to Hungary this moment! Even here in Czech
> republic they are more than double your amount! And the prices rise...
> Is the pr
Hi all,
is there a more or less simple repair for the releaser button of a Pentax
Super-A?
The problem: the button should offer two levels: the first one to display
the choice of time and aperture, the second level to release the shutter.
The information of the first level should remain display
Hi all,
is there any 'phictionary' around, that is a dicitionary for photography?
I maintain a dictionary project for bicycles, called 'bictionary' on
www.fa-technik.adfc.de (offering English, German, French, Dutch and some
more languages).
Since I don't know the proper English terms for many p
Double YES Not to mention going light. The future does not look
good for the film advance lever. It seems like good business sense to make
a modular camera, you get sucked in by the body, then you want the
winder/motordrive. I imagine the MZ-s would be quite a bit smaller if you
could
I picked up an MX last night on eBay for $100. The lister states that the shutter
speed in the viewfinder does
not change but that the shutter speeds and the rest of the camera function fine. Would
this be an "easy" fix or
does anyone have an idea as to what may or maynot be wrong with it?
An
Gary,
I have never had an MX apart far enough to get into the shutter speed display
dial so I can't say for certain how easy a fix it might be. There could,
in fact, be several different failures which would give this symptom. Download
the service manual for the MX from my web site at http://www.
A scroll of mail from "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:30:21 +1000
Read it? y
>All future cameras need is a slow, silent winding mode (can't be too
>hard if Canon can do it) and non auto rewind (I noticed recently that
>Nikon F4s retained a manual rewind crank, don't know i
A scroll of mail from Collin Brendemuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri,
07 Sep 2001 07:15:32 -0500
Read it? y
>... everywhere. :)
They don't know they're umlauts?
dàáâäåvèéë
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
A scroll of mail from "David A. Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri,
7 Sep 2001 08:20:02 +1200
Read it? y
>Dave O'Brien writes:
>
>> Pentax could easily make an F5 killer from the Z-1p if they gave up on
>> small size. Just upgrade the AF and the fps, and add the interval
>> timer back.
>
> I'm not
Mark Roberts wrote:
> What Mike spent on his setup is a lot less than some people spend for one camera
> or one lens. One should also take note of the fact that a lot of his gear can be
> used for printing scans of negatives or slides. I have a similar setup only with
> a film scanner instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I exposed that film as 320, skin tones went out
> very natural, blacks are black with shades, not "black holes", whites are
> white, and that altogether in one frame, perfect. I didn't believe it's
> possible.
Hey, good luck!
If you're happy with NPH, NPS (160 speed)
You're probably right so far as what will be available from now on,
nevertheless...
From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "David A. Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> (snip)
> > My ideal camera would see a return to separating the motordrive from
> the
> > body. There are times when smal
I use a program called ACDC and print out my
thumbnails (from the D1)from this.I can manipulate the size and
print them out on hi res Epson paper for viewing
at shows.So far reactions have been positive
Dave
Begin Original Message
My colour darkroom has been shut down. My black and
Kids? I resemble that comment ;p
--- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> >
> > I'll second that, evey PDMLer I have personally
> met has been a wonderful person.
>
> Thirded. You all rock, kids.
>
> -Aaron
> -
Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yah
Something is bothering me a bit...
I have heard repeated references to Pentax cameras vs.
other brands in relation to admirably smaller size.
For instance, the N F5 and C EOS-1V are
decried as monsters and behemoths - as though, of
course, we wouldn't one of those. And a post of
perhaps
Ok this was a very informal test, I got 4 radio shack
1600 mha nimh AA batteries and brand new kodak
photolife batteries, put them in the AF330 and tried
it, recharge time was 5-6 sec and I fired 200 test
shots with no drop in recharge time at full power ( MH
manual mode ) then put the photo life
From: Chaso DeChaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm drawn to Pentax for the same reason I was drawn to
> Konica - for the optics I enjoy. The Konica and
> Pentax 50mm lenses are my favorites. I love Pentax
> lenses. Am I alone here? When we discuss bodies on
> this list, I feel like I'm with the wr
Martin wrote:
> The problem: the button should offer two levels: the first one to display
> the choice of time and aperture, the second level to release the shutter.
> Since I just learned about someone else, observing the same failure, I
> guess it's a frequent problem. Any idea?
No
- Original Message -
From: "Francis Tang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Manual back-up bodies
| |
| When I read the title, I assumed you wanted a MANUAL camera, but I
| guess you already know that the MESuper and SuperA don't aren't such.
OK, perhaps I should have said "manual focusi
I have a digipower charger and 4 aa batteries that
someone gave me for xmas.I charged them up for the 14 hours
as stated and put them in a Vivitar 285.Charge time after a dozen
or so shots was in the 15-20 sec range.(I have not tried with
regular aa from a store yet.)I recharged them an seemed to
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Scoot Doggy Dogg wrote:
> What I'd like to do is have the photoshop guy burn me a CD with the
> pics in question so I can take em home & fiddle with em under ADOBE
> Photoshop/Paintshop Pro... then take em back so he can print em.
>
> Does this sound like something YOU would
Has anyone tried this with an AF500FTZ ?
What was the outcome ?
Regards
Patrick
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I may just be dense, but I don't see the advantage. Can someone explain it to me well
enough that I will feel compelled to devote time to it? Before you get started,
"because the Nikon group has it" is not a valid reason.
Doug
yes, I'm that dense
At 12:55 PM -04009/7/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
Hey folks. Something's wonky with my ZX-5n when I mount my Sigma lenses
on it. I got 3 Sigma lenses now, and all exhibit the same sort of
problem.
The 75-200 f/2.8~3.5 consistently reports the f/stop as 1/2 stop higher
numerically than on the ring, except at the 2.8, 16, 19, and 22
positions whe
Just got back from Don's Used Photo with a (new to me) FA* 300/4.5... Seems
like a great lens, will be shooting high school football tonight. Will let
you know how it goes. :)
Nick
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the direc
I'm guessing they would be better than nicads but the
real draw back of the nimh is when they die they just
die, not like alkalines where they gradually drain
away these won't power the flash at all once drained
and there is no warning. I'd say borrow them and see.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Doug Brewer wrote:
> I may just be dense, but I don't see the advantage. Can someone
> explain it to me well enough that I will feel compelled to devote
> time to it? Before you get started, "because the Nikon group has
> it" is not a valid reason.
Now, I'm going to get flame
John wrote:
> Hey folks. Something's wonky with my ZX-5n when I mount my Sigma lenses
> on it. I got 3 Sigma lenses now, and all exhibit the same sort of
> problem.
Nah, something's "wonky" w/ the Sigma lenses -- stories like
yours abound. Incompatability w/ manufacturer's sp
Sounds like you're about as good with superglue as me.
As far as Asahi Photo are concerned, the rewind crank came loose on my LX,
and I sent it back to themfor a repair and service. The turnaround was
amazing. I posted the camera on a Thursday, and a cardboard box arrived back
home on the Monday.
Fishwick's of St Helens is a name that brings back some memories. Does
anyone know what became of them? They seem to have disappeared from view.
Peter (not that one)
- Original Message -
From: Chris Stoddart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>
> Aaron,
> Which inks are you using in the Epson printers?
The 7500 uses the same pigment set as the 2000P. I haven't decided
which monochrome inkset to go with yet for the 1200.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http
Doug, could you to print out the messages that are of personal interest
to me and FedEx them?
I want to borrow your 80-200 too.
Thanks.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
I think we could all do the numbering ourselves without any effort on the
part of the list maintainer. We just need to establish a specific number
code for subject lines and use it consistently. Then instead of laboriously
typing in a subject we could simply enter the appropriate number:
The "Fil
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1272710850
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Hi,
photojournalism has good reason to be grateful to Hungary for many
reasons. I have the catalogue from an exhibition held in 1987 at the
UK's National Museum of Photography, Film and Television, Bradford
called "The Hungarian Connection - the Roots of Photojournalism". It
features a great many
I've got dibs on his FA100/2.8 Macro.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Doug, could you to print out the messages that are of personal interest
> to me and FedEx them?
>
> I want to borrow your 80-200 too.
>
> Thanks.
>
> tv
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubs
My Pz-20 and MZ-M do the same thing with sigmas. It
will still expose correctly but I really wish the lens
was a F1.2 70-300mm zoom. If you set the aperture
manually it reads correctly.
Think of it as an undocumented sigma feature.
--- "Bill D. Casselberry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> John wrot
Doug Brewer wrote:
> I may just be dense, but I don't see the advantage. Can someone
> explain it to me well enough that I will feel compelled to devote time
> to it?
Hi Doug,
Hey -- don't be so hard on yourself! I don't read the digest anymore, but I
used to when Pentax was still the official
I have a problem counting past 10 (gotta take off my shoes), could be a
problem...
Norm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think we could all do the numbering ourselves without any effort on the
> part of the list maintainer. We just need to establish a specific number
> code for subject lines and use
Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I may just be dense, but I don't see the advantage. [...]
What would really be advantageous, is if people who communicate using
mailing lists like this one could use a common standard for that
communication, say, for example, plain text with < 80 charac
Oh wait now I see, this is also not a problem. My
Vivitar 28mm F2.8 reads weird apertures to as did my
old 20-210 AF. On the Zoom it was the fact it was
variable so the printed F was not always the actuall
value, on the 28mm it was a sloppy ring on the lens
but a Sigma 24mm just plain reported all
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1270850045
Woof!
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.ko
Hi,
> Something is bothering me a bit...
[...]
> design objective. All this has made me wonder: am I
> perhaps missing the point of Pentax cameras?
yes, you probably are. Their traditional philosophy has been to produce
compact bodies with a good feature set, quality build and at a price
that b
Hi,
all photo mailing lists have the same threads, only the brand names
are changed, so perhaps somebody should submit an rfc to the w3c so
that the threads are standardised across all lists. In fact, the
opinions are also all the same, and there are exactly 3 for each
thread. So communication ca
Let me start out by saying that there aren't a lot of folks here
that were photographers before 35mm cameras came along.
To keep things modern, let's consider doing a ten or twelve hour
day shooting a wedding and its ensuing reception with an RB-67
(or an RZ-67) a Stroboframe bracket, with a flas
Chaso wrote:
>Something is bothering me a bit...
>
>SNIP
>...two months ago mentioned that one fairly
>consistent commonality amongst Pentaxers is a
>penchant for compact bodies. The PZ bodies have
>been called here an attempt of Pentax to be like
>N. The MZ-S,as well as both the LX and t
To all Pug-sters:
I've been so thoroughly thrilled by shooting 35mm that I've been casually
mentioning my enjoyment to various friends. I assure all that this was done
w/o any intentions other than "talking photography".
Lo and behold, family and friends have been unearthening pentax bodies.
"Daniel J. Matyola" wrote:
> Dan { LFYBBK }
Damn! Those letters in parentheses were my name in Cyrillic! a copy I sent to
someone else came out fine, but they were "cleansed" from my email on this list. Just
the sort of ethnic bias I was complainibg about!
Dan
--
Daniel J. Matyola
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 10:23:00 -0400, David J Brooks wrote:
> I use a program called ACDC and print out my
> thumbnails (from the D1)from this.I can manipulate the size and
> print them out on hi res Epson paper for viewing
> at shows.So far reactions have been positive
I think that's ACDSee, Dave
Interesting image processing technique by NASA. Some of the example
images are impressive, although some of them seem too have been
overprocessed.
http://dragon.larc.nasa.gov/retinex/pao/news/
I guess it won't be long until there's a Photoshop plugin...
j
--
--
On Fri, 07 Sep 2001 13:05:59 -0400, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> [...] the Cyrrillic (Russian) alphabet, with 33 letter, [...]
I thought the Cyrrillic alphabet had 52 letters?
TTYL, DougF
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow t
A few days ago I questioned trying to cram so many features into the
small MZ-S, making (for me) a body that is hard to use because the
controls are tiny and stiff. Then I got dumped on by another list member
who likes the camera.
I have two 1p bodies and like them very much. They have spoiled me
Darn! I missed it! Well, maybe next time, when the price is
more in line with reality. ;-)
Len
---
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: D
I have fairly average sized hands (maybe a bit on the
smaller side) and the feel of the early M/ZX bodies
(the 50 and the 10) were good, although a little small
and fairly plasticky. They were better feeling than
the C the N or the M** equivilant. With
the FG battery pack on my ZX-50
At 12:32 7-9-2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Subject: MX Question
>
>I picked up an MX last night on eBay for $100. The lister states that the
>shutter speed in the viewfinder does
>not change but that the shutter speeds and the rest of the camera function
>fine. Would this be an "easy" fix or
>does any
I guess I am dense too. Why not just sort the list into threads before posting it on
the server?
--graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I think we could all do the numbering ourselves without any effort on the
> part of the list maintainer. We just need to establish a specific number
> code f
I have never even touched a Program Plus, but I would wager it is telling you there is
no film in
it.
--graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> To all Pug-sters:
>
> I've been so thoroughly thrilled by shooting 35mm that I've been casually
> mentioning my enjoyment to various friends. I assure
> So I put a new set of two durecell A76 batteries. I put the batteries
> one on top of another with the positive (plus+) showing. No shutter,
> no meter. I reversed the batteries with both positives (plus+) not
> showing.
>
> Now with the camera set to manual I get a flashing "E" in the left
>
Anyone interested in these?
Chinon K-mount 50/1.9 lens; takes 49mm filters. It seems to function
perfectly. Excellent cosmetically.
Spiratone viewfinder magnifier -- slips into slots on viewfinder. Fits okay
on Spotmatic, but the frame has been fiddled with in someone's clumsy effort
to make
Robo,
Try using MS76 batteries. The A76's are too weak to run the camera.
The shutter won't fire without electricity - electromagnetic release.
The first 2-3 shots on a Super Program register at 1/1000th and I suppose the
Program Plus does this too. It's a feature that prevents the tyro from
I'm disappointed that less than half of the PUG commentators have posted
remarks. And I can say this without being selfish because my photo was
commented on in depth by a number of people. I appreciate that. But I
enjoy the discussions of other members photographs and of the debates
about photogra
From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My colour darkroom has been shut down. My black and white darkroom is
> still quite active, for two reasons:
>
> 1) it's a pain in the ass to do a contact sheet digitally,
> 2) without a printer that has been converted for monochrome printing,
> digital
I do my BW contact sheets digitally. I scan them on an Agfa Duoscan 2500
T we have at work and print them on an Epson 1200. Just fine for
contacts. But my experiments with printing digital BW photos have been
just so-so. The darkroom is still the best place for that. I have had
good success scanni
I put a few filters up, red, yellow, blue, fog
(all 52mm)
check out my things _ i don't have a lot of stuff listed
so the filters will come p quickly -
I'm annsan on ebay as a seller, too.
Got a couple of bids on the fog and blue filters already.
Thanks to all who have offered me shelter from
Hi, Paul,
You're right. Last month was a case in point. Three or four people had my
image on their list of images to comment upon, yet I didn't see one
comment. It was disappointing, because that particular photo is a favourite
of mine, and I was anxious to see what others on this list thought
From: "Chaso DeChaso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I do just happen to love Pentax optics, but actually might consider
switching to Contax if it weren't for the prices and for the
> backwards compatability issues with their changing mounts.
As long as you're willing to stay between 28 and 100, the pric
Paul S. brought up an issue worth discussing or being pointed out:
> I'm disappointed that less than half of the PUG commentators have posted
> remarks.
Well, so far it's only the 8th of this month. But I'd agree that the sooner the
better. (How did the commentators do last month? Seem to remem
89 matches
Mail list logo
