Kevin Waterson wrote:
>
> How many more stops would I gain? 2?
no, would only be 1
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Mark Cassino wrote:
but here's some first impressions:
Mark,
Thanks for that.
Can you confirm that it has the same 6 volt battery booster capability, and
cable fitting, the same as the 500 FTZ's?
Max
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.ne
I have a very low light situation and was going to use an
ilford 3200 but then I though, why not use some of this
Fuji 1600 color film I have in the fridge and set the MZ-S
to 3200 manually?
Any pitfalls of doing this? I can apprciate more grain but
can live with that.
How many more stops would
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
> Chris,
> I'm not in December's PUG. I know we talked (?) about a standing comment
> request but you said to sort through the folks who do want comments and the
> ones who don't this month or are not submitting each month would be too
> much. A
"Tom Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can only rate printers I have seen prints from,
> so send me one from those printers. That is what
> the challenge was from the start. Show me!
I'd love to, but not possible in the time frame you've allowed. I live
in Australia, and who knows how
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> HOWEVER! The idea that the list should be censored because a few of us
> have bad manners is still unacceptable to me.
Off-topic posts will always come up, regardless of how strict the rules
are. Let's try to label them as "OT," okay? It's not idea
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> With three submissions in I have to say that the new generation of inkjet
> printers is far better than I thought they would be. Also it is already
> clear that operator skill is a big factor in print quality.
Sorry if this has been mentioned before, but what size prints
I missed the beginning of this thread.
I have the Epson C80. If you want any prints from that, tell me what papers to use
(the only Epson glossy it works well with is Epson Professional Glossy) and I will
send them.
Maris
P.S. I will need a mailing address
- Original Message -
Fro
Aye
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Thanks to everyone who enlightened me on their approaches to
extention tube aperture calculations (both via the list and by private
E-mail). There are a lot of ways to look at the question but they all
converge to about the same answer -- in my case the f/2 lens
becomes somewhere around f/4 wi
By the way
I believe I'm going to stop agitating in favor of digital now. I've made my
points _ad nauseam_ . I don't really want to become the List's official
digital booster. I will say that if I had the money I'd get a D30 right now.
And I'll be waiting for PMA this February. But if an
Graywolf wrote:
> I want to apologize to the list for my bad manners. My issue with Kent
> should have been discussed privately and respectfully with him.
Now see, isn't this a great list? You all are a great bunch of folks. Where
else on the internet do people apologize like civilized men and
I've not examined this little trove of software and information, but you
might find something of interest or value here:
http://www.digitaltruth.com/software.html
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/pow/enter.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/c
On Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 02:35 PM, Patrick White wrote:
> This makes the images produced on a
> Mac appear too light (or is it too dark?) on PCs.
> Basically, there are three apropaches to dealing with this: 1)
> make it look
> goon on a Mac and forget about the PC users, 2) ma
> Adelheid wrote...some of my efforts can be viewed at
> http://www.kirschten.de
I found your work quite delightfful and skillfully executed. I hope you will
choose to submit to the PUG. Thanks for taking on the task.
Paul Stenquist
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubsc
PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> I missed the beginning of this thread. Where can I send my submission?
> Paul
Oops, it was in the next message. Thanks.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
vis
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> HOWEVER! The idea that the list should be censored because a few of us have
> bad manners is still unacceptable to me.
>
I agree wholeheartedly. Censorship could turn this list into dull, greay
pablum. If it wasn't for the occasional outburst (a few of which I can lay
cl
Hi Tom,
I missed the beginning of this thread. Where can I send my submission?
Paul
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> With three submissions in I have to say that the new generation of inkjet
> printers is far better than I thought they would be. Also it is already
> clear that operator skill is a big fa
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote in regard to MX variations:
>
> 1) The rectangular film holder on the back is the same *BUT* the
> "Asahi Opt. Co., Japan" writing on the holder is smaller on the
> 9450593 body (22,5x1,5mm vs. 29x1,9mm);
I have two MX bodies. 9158140 and 4325254. Both have rectangular f
Thanks for steeping up and taking the job.
Good luck and don't be afraid to ask (not me ,of course :)) for help if you
need it.
Cory Waters
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:16 PM
Subject: OT: PUG News - Intro
>
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 10:52 PM, dave o'brien wrote:
> >
> > There's a place for flames about various hot-button topic and it's
> > called:
> > Not Here!
>
> I thought you were going to say Usenet.
I thought about it, but decided that
--- Bob Poe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Quiberon" by Juame Lahuerta contains a beatiful
> atmosphere, a celebratory feeling, enhanced by the
> reaching skyward figure. I wonder if it would be
> stronger from a lower camera angle, placing the
> reaching figure more in the clouds?
Thanks Bob.
Of all the places there should be a pop-up warning against doing what you
don't intend, this should be among them.
Sorry for the mass post, list.
- Original Message -
From: "Cory or Brenda Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:59 PM
Subj
--- Gianfranco Irlanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> First, I'm sorry for being (again) so late with my
> assignment.
Don't worry, better late than never... ;-)
> " Quiberon " by Jaume Lahuerta;
>...
> The only
> thing I don't like in this picture is the separation
> between the
> sky and the
Hi Lasse,
I just saw your post today, I havent' had too much time to read the
list thoroughly lately...
Thanks for your comments and suggestions. I'm not sure I like the
cropping you suggest, but I agree with you regarding the contrast. I
was agitating too much those days...
j
On Wed, 21 Nov
Hi Flavio,
i've added your site.
Thanks,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Flavio Minelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: PDML Members Web Sites List has moved
> Hi Paul and thanks for your effort.
>
> I hope you'll
That WOULD be cool.
I'm so often disappointed with images on one screen and then slightly
suppressed when they look better (or worse) elsewhere.
I often wonder what my images look like on other people's screens.
I KNOW they looked much darker on my screen at work until I got a little
too distract
Chris,
I'm not in December's PUG. I know we talked (?) about a standing comment
request but you said to sort through the folks who do want comments and the
ones who don't this month or are not submitting each month would be too
much. Anyway, I missed the equinox thingie so
Also, I got assign
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:35:27 -0800, Patrick White wrote:
> One of these days, some bright person will get around to designing a
> popular image encoding format that stores the image data and the gamma that
> that data was encoded with.
TIFF can do that, but very few TIFF writers put gamma
Asking that people don't discuss religion, politics, and
taxation on a photography discussion list is a far cry from
censorship. There are lots of places where certain subjects are
inappropriate.
Stating that you will leave the group if folks don't want to
discuss these things is closely akin to
At 12:52 28-11-2001 -0500, you wrote:
>From: "Peifer, William [OCDUS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Leonid Meteor pic
>
>Wendy wrote:
> > And here's my solitary meteor
>
> > http://members.home.net/wbeard11/leonids.html
>
>Hi Wendy,
>
>This is an odd-looking meteor. On my monitor, at least,
Hi and good luck with your new position.
Now you'll have to start making some submissions to the PUG :)
Cya
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:16 AM
Subject: OT: PUG News - Intro
> *LOL*
> I have been so quiet, be
Everbody makes mistakes. It takes class to apologize.
>I want to apologize to the list for my bad manners. My issue with Kent
>should have been discussed privately and respectfully with him. It was
>neither. I have no acceptable excuse for my behavior.
Don't worry. This group's maturity and civi
On Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 03:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Which Firewire scanner though?
Polaroid SprintScan 120. Get beautiful, massive scans from your 67 negs
and trannies.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.ne
Censorship as such wasn't in Mike's original eMail, he simply asked that:
>we, the PDML, agree that this is not a list for
> discussing taxes, taxation, and government fiscal matters.
Which I read as meaning that we should try to stick more closely to the list
topic in our posts, rather than hav
I want to apologize to the list for my bad manners. My issue with Kent
should have been discussed privately and respectfully with him. It was
neither. I have no acceptable excuse for my behavior.
HOWEVER! The idea that the list should be censored because a few of us have
bad manners is still unac
Please send the messages to me directly, to not disturb other
members,thanks.
Also, I've not included 110 and digital cameras, just because I started
this way, and I didn't want to change in the middle of the way.
Also, if you already submited and want to add new items, please put clearly
in your
I received this from Tom today.Now i'm red faced
Cotty.
Thanks again Tom for the input
Dave
Some snipping from original personal data
Begin Original Message
From: "Tom Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:25:16 -0500
To: "David Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subjec
1- You must choose JUST ONE Pentax brand body of any era and format.
2- You must have personal experience with it, no matter if you own it,
owned it, borrowed it, rented it. You must have used it (it's not a wish
list).
3- Again, you must choose JUST ONE.
4- Send the answers OFF-LIST, TO ME, to do
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list exclusively. On-list votes will not be
included.
2 - You must choose Your Favorite Pentax Lens. ONLY ONE. Yes, ONLY ONE.
3 - It must be original, no third-party allowed.
4 - Primes and zooms.
5 - You must specifiy: Tak, Super Tak, SMC Tak, K,
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list, right to me.
2 - You must choose your favorite emulsion (35 and 120/220 allowed. Color
and b
and w)
3 - You must choose ONLY ONE (color print OR slide OR b and w, etc).
4 - You must have personal experience with it.
WINNER by now: Tri-X and
Nope mine.
Dave Brooks
Begin Original Message
From: tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:01:55 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PDML Digiital Printing Challenge
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
>
> With three submissions in I have to say that the new generation of
inkje
*LOL*
I have been so quiet, because my client refused to post to the PDML so I
lurked most of the time. But since I took on this task I persuaded it to
behave...
I used to have a ME super bought around 1981, it has been a very good camera
travelling with me all around the world. But one day it di
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
>
> With three submissions in I have to say that the new generation of inkjet
> printers is far better than I thought they would be. Also it is already
> clear that operator skill is a big factor in print quality.
I bet. The Canon is Mike's, right?
tv
>
> Printer rating
There is still time to get your submission in before the 15th of December.
REPOST:
Ok, I have given Aaron's expansion of my challenge some thought. I just
wanted to see a truly photographic quality digital print from a consumer
inkjet. I have never seen one though I have seen many that I was t
With three submissions in I have to say that the new generation of inkjet
printers is far better than I thought they would be. Also it is already
clear that operator skill is a big factor in print quality.
Printer ratings:
Epson Photo 1270. D+
Epson Photo EX.E
Canon S-800. E+
PRI
Hi Luis,
Thanks for the kind words. I agree with you about the background -- it is
quite distracting. I was somewhat restricted on vantage points on this
shot, and I wonder if DOF would have been shallow enough at f/4 to blur the
background sufficiently? To maintain the 1/125 sec shutter speed
I decided in favor of USB2 and Firewire for my next round of peripherals,
including a new scanner.
Which Firewire scanner though?
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Aye to Dan.
Frits Wüthrich
Dan Scott wrote:
>
> Aye.
>
> I'd like to include religion, politics in general, characterization of
> nations and peoples, and which OS is the least poor copy of the Mac OS
> among the topics best left for off list or relegated to other lists.
>
> Dan Scott
> [EMAIL
In a message dated 11/28/01 12:13:52 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> But it can hardly be used to selectively focus on one subject, with a
> blurred background. It has strengths, it has weaknesses, just like any
> other format. But the basic quality of the images is eve
Michael Beacom wrote:
>Thanks for the input.
>Thats a vote in favor of the minolta.
>I agree, I would prefer USB if possible but if everyone told me the scsi
>model was superior I would go for it. I have read mixed reviews of the
>minolta.
>I think the biggest complaint was the lack of ICE or
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list, right to me.
2 - You must choose your favorite emulsion (35 and 120/220 allowed. Color
and b
and w)
3 - You must choose ONLY ONE (color print OR slide OR b and w, etc).
4 - You must have personal experience with it.
WINNER by now: Tri-X and
Patrick White wrote:
>"Dan Scott" wrote:
>>(sometimes shifting her monitor to my Mac), but it isn't the same. Text
>>and graphics on her 17" are crisp and clear, but some photos in various
>>web galleries are now very "blah"-- but were quite nice viewed on my old
>>monitor.
>One of these days
In a message dated 11/28/01 12:08:09 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> It's
> a
> > lot tougher to take good pictures with a 6x7 than with a 35mm. That's why
> > the vast majority of us use 35mm.
> >
>
> I wonder why that would be the case. Are you saying it's because they
Michael,
Only having seen ICE in action and not owning a scanner that uses it,
my comments must be taken with a grain of salt. When scanning with
ICE on, the scan time is longer. It has to scan one more pass to get
the surface defects. I am also told and have read that it softens the
image sli
Thanks bud.
tv
William Robb wrote:
>
> Greetings:
> The December 2001 gallery will be the last gallery I work on as
> maintainer. Adelheid Kirschten will be taking over stewardship
> of the PUG after I have the next gallery finalized.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To uns
Michael,
I used to have the HP S20 and now own the Minolta Scan Dual II. Of
the two, I prefer the Minolta. Both scanners have benefited by using
Hamrick's Vuescan software (www.hamrick.com) - especially with slides.
Sorry I can't comment on the Canon. For me, one of the pluses to the
Minolta w
After looking at the specs of the coming Canon EOS-1D I can see that anybody
currently using a D30 in an action environment will immediately sell it to
get the new one. There is a big difference between 3fps at a 5 frame burst
compared to 8fps at a 16-21 frame burst.
With my current investment in
Key thing in a lot of specs is the dynamic range. A lot of the earlier
scanners were 3.6 and below which would not always capture the full range of
a negative or slide. Right now 4.2 seems to be the best and according to
something I read this is right about the range of slide film I think. I
thin
Your advice still matters Tom
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: "Tom Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:22:47 -0500
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Take cover!
My flame was not about subject matter but about attitude. Obviously
you can
not see the diffe
--- John Fieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Executive summary: SuperProgram chronically under
> exposes (read: load
> 400 film, set camera to 200 to get decent exposures)
> and great
> inconsistency in shutter priority or full program
> modes. I suspect
> something amiss with the aperture cou
Hi Mark ...
While the results I've seen don't cause me to wax ecstatic over digital
camera/print combinations, I have to agree with your comments wrt
quality. If you like it, and gets the job done for you, all the
technical reasons in the world why it can't be are meaningless. Whether
I, or any
Now, if we could get together and buy a good monitor calibration package, we
could send it around and all get our monitors calibrated. Probably wouldn't
work for all of us, though. The kind I mean isn't just software but
includes a colorimeter, too.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Dan
Bob Walkden wrote:
> I seem to recall that some Fox Talbot photographs were 'saved for the
> nation' recently. This is confirmed by Hansard (the proceedings of the
> House of Commons):
>
>http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199697/cmhansrd/vo970319/text/70319w16.htm
> There i
On the subject of scanners.
Does anyone have any experience with the Canoscan FS2720U or FS2710.
I am new to this list (as well as new to digital scanning), so if this has recently
been discussed I
apologize.
I plan on scanning mostly color slides and some color negs.
I think I have narrowed it
I using digital and getting excellent results. I really don't care about
the sophistry that's being bandied about: I'm doing large prints (13 x 19)
taken with digitals, and they are not just good enough, the quality is great.
You can advance the personal insult argument and claim that I have l
At 08:58 AM 11/15/01 -0500, Cory Waters wrote:
>Just a poll:
>Where do you buy your film?
I buy slide film in bulk from B&H - several bricks ordered in the winter
(to assure transport in cold weather) and then it goes into the deep
freeze. I save several dollars per roll purchasing it this way
>Does this scanner just scan 35 mm or will it do 2 1/4
Just 35mm. It's the baby of the line...
HTH
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads
http://www.macads.co
Hey Mike, I hope I'm not torqueing you off on this thread. We're arguing,
but good-naturedly I hope.
Mike Johnston wrote:
>
> The bigger the camera, the better the technical quality
That is the only point I'm trying to make.
> , and the harder it
> is to get dynamic, interesting pictures.
Wendy wrote:
> And here's my solitary meteor
> http://members.home.net/wbeard11/leonids.html
Hi Wendy,
This is an odd-looking meteor. On my monitor, at least, it appears like a
dotted line instead of a solid streak. Is this a scanning artifact, or were
you shooting through a moving fanblade o
Hi,
well, since there are a number of important photographic collections
in public galleries in the UK, including Tate Modern, the V&A, the
National Museum of Film, Photography and Television (or is it the
other way round), the RPS collection, the Royal Geographical Society
collection, the Scienc
My faithful monitor, a 6+ year old NEC XV17+, excited its last electron a
week or so a go. I've been making do with my wife's mid-level pc since then
(sometimes shifting her monitor to my Mac), but it isn't the same. Text and
graphics on her 17" are crisp and clear, but some photos in various web
Hi Jan,
I must say that I hardly believe that!
I'd like to trust you, but... there are clearly two light
sources that light the grapes (the natural light shadows are
longer and lighter that the black shadows that appear to be the
consequence of a closer light). There is no other way I can
think u
My flame was not about subject matter but about attitude. Obviously you can
not see the difference, but then again you censors want to cut in and run
everybody elses life. Probably because you don't have one of your own. I do
regret having put my respose to Kent on the list, because I had promised
Ok, here's the reminder. We're keeping it nice and simple. If you want
your PUG photo commented on, feel free to send me a letter *off-list* at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] saying "Hey, this is and I
want to have my photo commented on for this PUG" or something like that,
and it'll be done. If you send t
Dan Scott wrote:
>I'd like to include religion, politics in general, characterization of
>nations and peoples, and which OS is the least poor copy of the Mac OS
>among the topics best left for off list or relegated to other lists.
Hear Hear Dan! Well said!
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is
Dan Scott wrote:
> Aye.
>
> I'd like to include religion, politics in general, characterization of
> nations and peoples, and which OS is the least poor copy of the Mac OS
> among the topics best left for off list or relegated to other lists.
Let's not go overboard here. That might take much o
You may have followed my ordeal a while back.
I was getting scratches using a PZ-1p. They were intermittent, not on all
rolls, not on all frames. Yet, when they occurred it was for long
stretches.
I wasted a couple of rolls of film and traced it down to the metal "springy
thing'' inside the ca
There is an interesting BBC story today reporting the following about
some photos made by Lewis Carroll, a 19th century English mathematician,
writer and photographer who seemed to specialize in photographing little
girls (see PDML standard reference book, p. 363.) He is best known,
probably,
Aaron wrote:
>> When I was working at Sterling we had a guy who brought in a camera (a
>> Pentax MZ-50, actually) that had a badly deformed shutter with a
>> thumbprint in the middle of it. He insisted for about fifteen minutes
>> that it had just been that way when he opened the camera and that
Tom C. wrote:
> I understand your point...I would guess that these are all exceptions to the
> rule.
Okay. I don't agree.
> My point is that for YEARS and YEARS AND YEARS a larger negative/film
> size has been seen as way to increase the quality (I know you resist that
> term) of one's work,
Slacker. Pansy. Quitter! :-)
Tom C.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:06 PM
> Subject: PUG News
>
>
> > Greetings:
> > The December 2001 gallery will be the last gall
Aye.
I'd like to include religion, politics in general, characterization of
nations and peoples, and which OS is the least poor copy of the Mac OS
among the topics best left for off list or relegated to other lists.
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Okay, since opening salvos in a gathering flame
Thanks for the comment Gianfranco,
But There was no flash used in this shot at all ...
It is the sun only, still quite low, early in the morning.
Regards, JvW
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 06:43:19 -0800 (PST), Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
>
>" Sunlit Grapes at Daybreak " by Jan van Wijk;
>If I mus
On Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 10:52 PM, dave o'brien wrote:
>
> There's a place for flames about various hot-button topic and it's
> called:
> Not Here!
I thought you were going to say Usenet.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.p
On Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 04:16 AM, Cotty wrote:
> without the plastic
> feel the Sprintscan had,
I was stunned at the difference in build quality between the SprintScan
4000 and the SprintScan 120. The 120 makes the 4000 look like a cheap
toy.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the P
AYE.
Mike Johnston wrote:
> Okay, since opening salvos in a gathering flame war have now been fired by
> both sides, I move that we, the PDML, agree that this is not a list for
> discussing taxes, taxation, and government fiscal matters.
>
> All in favor say "aye."
-
This message is from the Pe
On Tuesday, November 27, 2001, at 10:37 PM, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> That's a Grafmatic Magazine, Aaron. They are actually pretty reliable as
> long as the sepiums don't get bent. Robert White in the UK was
> advertising a
> plastic equivalent from Fuji. Came loaded but the ad said they were
>
Hi everybody,
First, I'm sorry for being (again) so late with my assignment.
Every month I would like to comment on many shots, but as usual
I have so little time so I postpone, postpone and then... the
month is over...
BTW, here they are:
" Dozers at the ready " by César Matamoros II;
This i
Aye!
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Take cover!
Okay, since opening salvos in a gathering flame war have now been fired by
both sides, I move that we, the PDML, agree tha
Aye
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I think the best multi format film scanner I've seen is the Minolta Scan
Pro. 4800dpi in 35mm, 4.2 dynamic range and does up to 6x9 I think. Not
cheap however.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Brooks
Sent: Wednesday, Nov
Aye
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Johnston
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Take cover!
Okay, since opening salvos in a gathering flame war have now been fired by
both sides, I
Correct. It is based on fractions of a wavelength of sodium light (sodium
about 500nm I think). It's actually possible to detect the difference
between a 1/4 wave optical system and one that is say 1/8 wave by looking at
the diffraction ring pattern from a point light source inside and outside of
Aye!
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads
http://www.macads.co.uk
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
To John,
If I read your initial mail correctly, your Super Program is having problem
when the lenses were set to 'A', and only. If so, the problem can be cured
easily. What happened was the electical contacts (6 silver contacts, the
springs and the circuit board underneath) underneath the "cam
John Fieber wrote:
>There is a black ring just inside the lens mount that
>rotates with the aperture ring on the camera. I'm guessing
>this is the rotating part of a variable resistor on the
>circumference.
This is certainly true of a parts SF1 that I have disassembled right now.
the resistor y
I've just been contacted by the Product Manager at Eastman Kodak who's responsible
for the RFS3600 film scanner. He wants to send me one to try out for a while.
This doesn't seem like an offer to turn down but I seem to recall that some
list members tried this scanner and had problems with it. If
John,
I think you have a good handle on the problem.
As for repair, I don't know where or who could do it.
Regards, Bob S.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery a
aye
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:32:15 -0600
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Take cover!
Okay, since opening salvos in a gathering flame war have now been
fired by
both sides, I move that we, the PDML, agree that thi
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
