Hi Bill:
The MZ-S prints the exposure data above the frame, in the spaces between the
sprocket holes.
My suggestion too would be to reconstruct the film and see if the problem is
with camera or processing.
I have not had any problems with frame spacing at all with any Pentax.
HTH
John Coyle
Trapped !! - Geoffrey Stevens
Nice! I like the shine on the fence.
Thanks for your comments.
I think your critique is excellent!
Regards,
Geofff
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
Hi,
the problem would be that the afterglow is mostly in invisible or
hardly visible spectrum radiation, to which film and paper is most
sensitive, but you don't see it. I would be extremely warry when
loading film into tank, and I would do some tests with paper, or at
least wait 5
NG camera. The company claims that enlargements from the SD9 exceed the
NG quality of 35mm film.
IIRC the Foveon chip is so far only 3.4 MP or such, even if true
megapixels and not interpolated megapixels from normal digicams.
I don't see how it could be better than film as even with 2700
Just thought I'd add a very positive note on Pentax Service in the UK -
bearing in mind that their service location is the edge of Slough (you have
to have been there), I wasn't necessarily expecting great things. My MZ-S
'died' a couple of weeks ago with the shutter sticking open and an Err
Hi all!
Again I'm seeking your advice. I've been assigned a task at work
and have some doubts about it. I have to go to client's place
and make photos of ice-cream and cakes. I can use my MZ-M or MX
(but I guess it's the least important) A50/1.7, FA35-80/4-5.6,
A135/2.8 and Mir20/3.5 (the
As there appears to be some dispute over the colour of the barrels, I will be
able to let you know about the current production middle of next week.
I dare not provide a photo - still have not yet worked out the white balance
on our digicam.
Kind regards from sunny Brighton
Peter
-
This
Maciej,
I'm no expert at it but I'd say you should avoid (hot) studio lights with the ice
creams and work very fast...
Aside for that I think you'll need an adequate set (backdrop, workbench, etc.). Being
yours not particularly reflective subjects you shouldn't have problems with the flash
My information is strictly unofficial, word of mouth. I do know that it's less
grainy yet has more apparent sharpness than it did when I first used it in the
late sixties. In any case, I would expect the changes to be beneficial. Even a
new base might affect development times, but I would think
Hi all,
What can I do against this:
http://cgi.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1334153963
I don't mean legally, but I would appreciate ideas on how to place the
copyright notices so that they are not so easy to remove. Am I dreaming
when thinking of images that do not allow
Cotty, you made my day! Thank you so much for the kind and encouraging
comments. I am trying very hard to become a really good photographer,
because anything worth doing is worth doing well. Your comments really help.
I may have said it before, but I think you take really wonderful photos,
Hi,
On 25 Feb 2002 at 19:33, Peter Smekal wrote:
I have a copied manual.
It says a red LED will glow next to LT, B2 when there is no
sufficient light or when the camera has selected a long exposure time.
How does on know which of these two alternatives the actual one at the
moment?
Both
I see the weird characters in Eudora 5.1 on Windows NT.
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
13 Selby Court
Poolesville, Maryland 20837-2410
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
H (301) 349-5243
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Bojidar Dimitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
What can I do against this:
http://cgi.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1334153963
That is a copyright infringment. The serial # says all.
I don't mean legally, but I would appreciate ideas on how to place the
copyright notices
I've enjoyed shooting with my new KX. With MLU engaged, the camera is as
vibration-free as my Yashica rangefinder. And even without it, vibration is
much lower than my Super Program's.
Manual exposure has its merits: Once you set it for the environment, you
needn't worry about dialing in
Boz,
You could do what BH does with their photos.
They have a big, but faint BH superimposed over the product.
That or you could put KMP Site in smaller white lettering
over some black portion of the item like the focusing grip.
In any case, I would complain to the offender and then let it go.
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was hoping I could use my Tamron lenses with the ME. It seems that
although the lens mounts OK, changing aperture has no effect on the
metering. Are the ME and adaptall for PK not compatible?
The mount and camera are perfectly compatible. Working
As expected the new 33-55 is quite expensive. In japan it's priced at
250.000 yen. That's somewhat less than the FA645 400/5.6 and somewhat more
than the FA645 300/5.6, for comparison.
Prices might of course vary from market to market but these prices give the
general idea. The 33-55 will be
No,looked like he did not have the battery pack on.
Don't think buy AA batteries is a problem eh. ;-)
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:47:00 -0600 (CST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Walter's N - was: Hockey
Five prominent photo industry members received the PMA Distinguished
Service Award today during the PMA 2002 Annual International Convention
and Trade Show in Orlando, Fla., USA. The award is given each year to
individuals whose exemplary, lifelong careers and dedication to the
photo imaging
On 26 Feb 2002 at 0:52, ryan brooks wrote:
And the 6mp Contax full-frame is real:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02022505contaxndigitalinhand.asp
I had heard within the last week that it was delayed.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
On Sunday, February 24, 2002, at 01:20 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
When it comes to scanning at 4000dpi, however, you can see how
the lens on the SLR camera gives you cleaner, sharper photos,
than those on the point-and-shoot.
I'd be interested to know whether this agrees with the collective
On Sunday, February 24, 2002, at 03:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is conceivable that Pentax might choose to go the same way without
a lens with aperture ring as an option as they now have no manual
focus old tech SLR in the 35mm range.
Even the MZ-S relies on the aperture
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 07:45 AM, David Brooks wrote:
Although this switch does come loose on occasion,like
for instance, on my first job with the D1.I turned the
camera on and all i got was a blinking FEE.Major
panic as i see my carrer hit the tubes.Thank God
i had the manual in
Thanks for sharing your impressions, Paul.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Pentax UK - excellent.
A few years ago - alright, quite some time ago, a good friend of mine sent
his 200mm F2.5M in to Pentax UK for some adjustment or other. Couple of weeks
later - gets grovelling letter from Pentax about the fact that they had had a
fire in the service department and
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 12:55 PM, Debra Wilborn wrote:
Let's not forget the women's match. Now THAT was a
game! I was cheering for the home team (USA! USA!
USA!), but apparently nobody knows ice like the
Canucks. :) And all that after being 0-8 against the
US!
Yep. Having
Simon wrote:
...and remember I only made a single comment about it - I didn't put up a
web page devoted to them! :-)
Those are some hideous fungi's (but nicely shot).
I do have to ask though - what were you doing in the Great Swamp Wildlife
Refuge?
What do you mean? I thought everyone spent
On 26 Feb 2002 at 12:41, Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
Hi all,
What can I do against this:
http://cgi.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1334153963
I don't mean legally, but I would appreciate ideas on how to place the
copyright notices so that they are not so easy to remove. Am I
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 12:14 AM, Peter Alling wrote:
Yes that's true but the reserve hasn't been met yet. So he/she/it
doesn't
have to buy it.
$15,000 before the reserve and a seller with no feedback...yikes!
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
At 08:43 26.2.2002 -0500, you wrote:
If, as I've read here earlier, Sigma has exclusive rights to the Fovean chip
for 5 years, they will become a major player in the digital field.
Bill
If they do, they certainly will.
I do not, however, find such an agreement very wise move from the Fovean
I think the difference is that one uses UPS and the other uses Fedex. One
nice thing with BH's web-site that they do indicate whether an item is
in-stock or not before you have ordered it.
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Even though i'v had t go to power zoom spectacles,
those look very nice indeed.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:10:57 -0800
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Foveon Fotos
Aaron wrote:
Yep. Having been at our last win against the US and then a couple of
pretty bad losses, I was just a little nervous. No work was done at the
store for those two hours on Thursday and again on Sunday for the men's
game.
I stopped by a friend's house on Sunday and he had the game
Maybe,just maybe,this is what Pentax was waiting for
to see the results of this technology.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Antti-Pekka Virjonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, Pentax, please make the MZ-D with this (or future) Foveon chip.
Antti-Pekka
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 05:59 AM, Pål Audun Jensen wrote:
Ultraweitwinkel Pentax SMC-FA 645
Dazzling price increase Fully automatic Fully automatic
I LOVE machine translation. Dazzling price increase, eh? ;)
Does anyone know if the 75mm f2.8 AL for 67 has ghostless coating? I
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 08:21 AM, Paris, Leonard wrote:
Do I hear a Brotherhood of The Green Lens starting to form?
Yeah, I want a green lens for my 67!
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Is there a correct shutter speed to adjust a mechanical
camera to when you are not using it 1/60, 1/125 or whatever.
I thought I once read a long time ago that there are speeds you
should not leave it on, on account of the tension on a mechanical
shutter spring.
I use Pentax MX and KX mechanical
I'd try burning a second identical roll and putting it through another lab
too.
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of wendy beard
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 02:51 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Nothing at the show, no press releases of future possibilities, etc.
Well, don't you think they know that trumpeting their D-SLR and then
discovering that they couldn't really make it the way they had planned
hurt them,
Are you referring to this link?
http://www.pentax.com/docstore/index.cfm?show=6
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:10:43 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Using tamron lenses with ME super
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
Hi all,
What can I do against this:
http://cgi.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1334153963
The Internet Remote Cattle-Prod Transmission Protocal. It transmits a
short, sharp electric shock to spammers and people who steal your images
This is one of the 2 reasons i picked up a list members
Super Program that was for sale.Vet respectable indoor
jumping flash shots with the 280t on TTL and camera
on Auto.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Paul F. Stregevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now that I've seen how easily I can use
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Well, don't you think they know that trumpeting their D-SLR and then
discovering that they couldn't really make it the way they had planned
hurt them, credibility-wise?
Yes.
In light of that, do you think they're going to announce any details
of their new D-SLR
How worried should I be about light leaks from my enlarger (Beseler 23CII)?
I have a few, some it seems must have always been there from new; like a
glow from the top of the lamp house or around the filter drawer. But also
there is some light escaping around the negative carrier which may be from
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 07:07 PM, William Robb wrote:
I am disturbed that Canada Post has decided to try to compete
with United Parcel Service for the stupid driver award.
They left about 500 bucks in equipment just sitting outside
in -25ºC weather, where anyone could have walked
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 08:57 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Got the 105mm F2.4 SMCT for the P67 today and
snapped a few test shots. This lens is
AWESOME!
I have the SMC-P version, and I wholeheartedly agree. An excellent
performer, especially at wide apertures.
-Aaron
-
This
Hi Mick,
Some light leaks are normal. Be sure to have the area around the
enlarger painted a flat black, or covered with a black cloth that will
absorb, rather than reflect, the light. As long as the light doesn't
reflect on to the paper, you should be OK. Of course, test for fogging,
IAC.
Wasn't that an issue with the first MZ-Ses off of the line? That they
needed a software upgrade because of irregular frame spacing? I recall
something about this.
Wendy, get on the horn to Pentax Canada. What province are you in? If
it's Ontario, I can give you the number for their
David Brooks wrote:
Are you referring to this link?
http://www.pentax.com/docstore/index.cfm?show=6
That's the rascal. MES manual in PDF format, in case Alisair is
without.
Thanks,
mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Paul,
My Russian-born wife would say that dumb Yank is a tautology.
Paul M. Provencher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if I got your first and last names switched. I'm just a dumb Yank!
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
13 Selby Court
Poolesville, Maryland 20837-2410
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
H (301) 349-5243
-
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 11:57 PM, ryan brooks wrote:
What is the difference between the Late (modern) lenses and the older
6x7
lenses that seem to always be floating around used?
Is there a limitation related to the AE of the 67II? Better coatings?
Different designs in some
On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 01:10 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://www.sjphoto.com/web-special/index.htm
Can't tell a thing from these...
http://www.sjphoto.com/web-special/pages/0022matt.htm shows evidence of
either a heavy hand on the unsharp mask tool or an overzealous
sharpening
unless the big name players use their muscles and keep sigma out. In
which case fovean could die too.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:43:11AM -0500, Bill Owens wrote:
If, as I've read here earlier, Sigma has exclusive rights to the Fovean chip
for 5 years, they will become a major player in the
On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 01:53 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
And your point is?
That perhaps it isn't vaporware, that perhaps there will actually be a
camera produced using the full frame 6MP Phillips chip that Pentax was
supposed to be using in their D-SLR before they canned it.
Wow! Rough question. There will probably be as many answers as
there are people. My opinion, and it's just that, *my opinion*,
is that it is never wrong to leave a mechanical shutter
un-cocked. And, if it's left un-cocked, there is no better or
worse shutterspeed. Un-cocked is un-cocked.
What can I do against this:
http://cgi.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1334153963
I don't mean legally, but I would appreciate ideas on how to place the
copyright notices so that they are not so easy to remove.
Place a large copyright notice across the image making it visible
On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 07:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In any case, I would complain to the offender and then let it go.
I would suggest putting fine print on the site about what you charge for
use of your images, including an outrageous fee for commercial use (i.e.
to sell a
Shel wrote:
Seemingly not ... although an announcement saying that they are working
on something would be nice, but that's only from the perspective of an
interested consumer.
But they already did say so. The press release for the shelved 6mp MZ-D
state that they will be working on a more
I posted this Feb. 21 at $150; I've just dropped the price $25:
Bought it in September 1999 from Ritz Online, which had rated it a 9 after
a just-completed CLA. It's in great shape optically, mechanically, and
aesthetically. Original rear cap and SMC Pentax spring-loaded hood. For
front cap,
It has been bookmarked for emergencies as thusg
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:27:16 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Using tamron lenses with ME super
David Brooks wrote:
Are you referring to this link?
Boz asked:
What can I do against this:
http://cgi.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1334153963
I don't mean legally, but I would appreciate ideas on how to place the
copyright notices so that they are not so easy to remove. Am I dreaming
when thinking of images that do not allow
Doug Franklin wrote:
I was really wondering if any of the PS cameras had optics that
approached (or surpassed) SLR optics. On average, or something, I
guess.
Well, the results I get from my Pentax Zoom90WR show no
sign of the Hoover Effect; and the slides, especially,
Boz, it's very expensive to go after folks that copy web
pictures. If you try legal action, the defending lawyer has a
right to ask you to prove that the images are actually yours.
You'd have to produce negatives or slides to prove it. If you
acquired the images from friends that sent them to
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 12:06 AM, David A. Mann wrote:
And I still haven't sold the RB kit, so no 75mm f/2.8 for me yet :(
Keep trying, Dave, it'll happen. :)
Just to spur you along, I may post a new image from the 75mm this
afternoon. Shot a spur of the moment portrait of
On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 09:24 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Anyone else able to read Wayne Gretsky's (it was him, right?) lips when
the Canadians scored the goal that put them up 4-2? g I can understand
why they didn't have a microphone on him!
HAR! Yeah, Wayne has this reputation for
Thanks for the advice Shel! I don't think I would have ever thought about
the color of what I was wearing, but it's a damn good point. I'll do some
fogging tests around the same time as the safelight tests to be sure.
Hopefully I should be fully up and running with this project by the end of
the
And if javascript is turned off?
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: KMP Copyright Infringement(s)
On 26 Feb 2002
The US men's coach, Herb Brooks, made the comment that the Canadian team
played a terrific game and that the US team didn't have any legs left after
their tough semi final game against the Russians while the Canadians had a
relatively easy walk through to the finals. You could tell that the US
Nikon: D1 original, D1X/D1H, D100. These don't include the older Kodak/Nikon
DSLR's. Canon was late with a Pro level DSLR, but ahead of Nikon at the lower
end with the D30, and now on par. There's also the years of experience with
fixed lens, non SLRs and film scanners that these companies have.
Cheers Kath. Does this mean we'll have to get married now?
;-)
Cotty, you made my day! Thank you so much for the kind and encouraging
comments. I am trying very hard to become a really good photographer,
because anything worth doing is worth doing well. Your comments really
help.
I may
Your need to contact that store and tell them to cease and desist, invoice
them for the use of your photos up to that time too, makes them realize they
are stealing something valuable. Since this is a commercial firm, you are
dealing with a bigger issue here, you should talk to a copyright
I went back to the link a few minutes ago and the main
picture is now blank.The second one is still there.
Maybe Boz's on a roll.
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Aaron suggested:
It seems that the current eBay seller is not the person who manipulated
the image, rather it was a professional photo dealer with a store in
Berlin.
Send them a bill. Call the store and demand payment. Ask them so
explain their actions. Ask them if their store allows
I have won a second Ebay auction, for an Pentax SP and SMC Takumar 1:1.8/55
for US $71.16 + $7 shipping. I did not expect to win both.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1334082883ed=1014696
884
This takes my list of cameras to:
1 x SP(plus one given to my son)
2 x SPFs
1 x
I posted this lens last week for $100. Maybe at $80 someone will bite.
Glass is clean, all functions are smooth. No wear on focusing
ring. Includes generic rear cap, Vivitar Series One front cap, which falls
right off. Add $6 for a snap-in Tamron 72mm cap that stays on.
This lens close
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks, Debra,
That was a great game, and just as much of a
nail-biter, too. And
terrific hockey, I must say. In some ways I feel
better about that one
than the men's gold. There's the adversity of being
underdogs, but
also, they are true
On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 12:52 PM, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
Nikon: D1 original, D1X/D1H, D100.
...but you're not slagging Nikon for being 5 or 6 generations behind
Kodak?
Come on, be serious.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Paul,
I had not thought thru the ramifications of what I suggested, especially the
commercial opportunities. I think you are very right with the suggestion to
agressively defend your content.
Regards, Bob S.
I wrote: In any case, I would complain to the offender and then let it go.
Paul
On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 12:58 PM, T Rittenhouse wrote:
Unfortunately for them ignorance of the law is not a legal excuse. On
the
other you are not going to be able to collect damages unless you can
show
realistically that there is a money issue involved. If someone stole
your
At 10:26 PM 2/25/02 -0800, you wrote:
I guess it depends on where you live, or perhaps some other factor or
factors, but I've found that sometimes Adorama gets delivered to me
faster than items from BH.
That may be. I live in Chicago so that may be a major factor. I recently
ordered a lens from
Cotty,
Yes, I admit that I am one of those that, like you,
scan all PUG comments looking for his/her name.
An this time I found it:
-
Cadaques
Juame Lahuerta
It's the shot we all want to take one day, just
that most of us don't
quite make it to these quaint
Nikon and Canon aren't. Kodak is barely hanging in there with competive
products, let alone leading. Have you looked at the DCS720x and DCS760 (both
based on the F5)? Class leading technology is fueled with cubic dollars; Nikon
and Canon are willing and able to do so.
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL
I like all the petty little get even tricks I have seen in this thread. But,
as has been said, if Boz has commercial possibilities with his images,
allowing copyright infringements degrades the value. If someone feels it is
easier to copy a photo than to take one themselves they are admitting to
Thanks for your effort. Your critique is great...
since you picked my picture. ;-)
Seriously, I used to participate in Chris' organized
comments, but now that it is not working, I became
lazy. I have to figure out how to comment offline
having all the images stored previously (or suscribe
to an
Bojidar Dimitrov writes:
What can I do against this:
http://cgi.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1334153963
I don't mean legally, but I would appreciate ideas on how to place the
copyright notices so that they are not so easy to remove. Am I dreaming
when thinking of images that do not
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Let me warn you, the print from a Canon D30 Mike Johnson sent into
the Challenge, the one that made me ask if I should use such prints
to rate the printers, was so good it made my eyes blink.
Let that be a lesson to the pixel counters; there's a lot more to image
The closet cleaning continues:
Pentax SMC-A 50/1.4 in excellent condition. $80.00 to the list before it
goes on eBay. This is a *great* lens :-)
The SMC-F 70-210 is also still available.
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Can't handhold the 6x7, shutter vibration, etc. etc. HAR!!
Norm
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
These were shot handheld at 1/30 f5.6, lit just by the lamps in the
living room. The top left corner has been slightly burned in.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Yep, that is why I said Boz should contact a copyright attorney in that
case.
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:35 PM
No I don't .. I have no memory. That coupled with paying very little
attention to the discussions of the MZ-D, leaves me essentially ignorant
of circumstances surrounding the camera.
Len Paris wrote:
The full-frame MZ-D could have been real too.
You have a short memory, Shel.
--
Shel
Vanessa's parents were dressing up for a retro costume party last week
when it was decided that a portrait was needed. Luckily, I had the 67,
the 75mm and a roll of Delta 3200 in my bag.
Here's my favourite:
Hi,
Thank you all for your comments and suggestions. Sadly, I have had to
watermark all KMP images that I own, and now you all have to pay the
price of seing the lower-quality images.
If anyone needs a good image that I own, drop me a line.
I am going to pursue the issue a bit more with the
The Contax camera is only arriving now, in March. It was supposed to be
on the market last November, and now it's also going to be a really
tough sell (even for Zeiss fans with deep pockets) when compared to 6Mp
cameras from the Japanese (Pentax excluded, naturally :-( ).
Personally, I think
And the pics I received from Mike looked like crap, in that it was clear
they were digital, highlights were burnt out, there was color fringing,
and some other problems. Either we received different prints, or you
need new glasses g. I'd have to pull out the prints to be very
specific wrt each
Unless there's another, he's probably referring to Archbishop Desmond
Tutu, the South African churchman who campaigned for years to release
Nelson Mandela from prison.
(Hey, two posts, and both off topic...)
--
Kristian
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 07:02 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, [iso-8859-1] Mark Roberts wrote:
Pentax SMC-A 50/1.4 in excellent condition. $80.00 to the list before it
goes on eBay. This is a *great* lens :-)
Sign me up!
Contact me off list, please, to follow up.
--
http://www.infotainment.org
The destructive character is
On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 02:17 PM, Patrick White wrote:
As for copyright notice location, just paste it over a nondescript
part of
the barrel. There is still no guarantee that they can't retouch it
out, but
all you are really after is making it so much work that they go
On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 01:57 PM, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
Nikon and Canon aren't. Kodak is barely hanging in there with competive
products, let alone leading. Have you looked at the DCS720x and DCS760
(both
based on the F5)? Class leading technology is fueled with cubic
Apologies if you're reading this by mistake. You may lash me a hundred
times with the petrified vomit of a Tasmanian Devil for being so OT.
I'm embarking on a typically insane project, namely building a PowerBook
G3 (Lombard) from scratch. It will be documented over the coming weeks on
the
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
