Hi Steve and all Vivitar users,
yes it's normal and due to the floating element. IIRC, the rear element is
the floating one. If you turn the focus ring, you can see that from a
specific point, the rear element is moving ( or was it the front element ?).
As it gets hold in normal position by
Hi,
Fernando wrote:
Sorry, but I couldn't see where the paradox is..
and Bob S. wrote:
Think about the opposite.
amongst others.
My apologies for not making myself clear.
The paradox for me is at least two fold. I cannot represent
what I see as well as I see it, either because I have to
I have been casually looking out for a SMC 35/3.5 in K-mount for months, and have not
seen hide nor hair of it. I bought one in M42, and have seen 3 others for really
decent prices. But in K-mount this thing must be fairly rare. Same story for the SMC
85/1.8. I just bought one of those in M42
on 25.05.02 5:43, William Robb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must concur with Brother Bruce on this. Have you looked that
the Nikon F100 and the Nikkor lens line.
Much better AF than the PZ1p, and much faster operation than the
MZ-S.
And F100 has over 300 g of weight more than MZ-S... it
On a related issue (I have still boxes of 120 E-6 in the freezer and
they came out perfectly even after quite old),
I was told it's paramount to shoot and process freezed film as soon as
possible after getting it out of the fridge (with E-6 pro film which
has been already aged in the factory).
Don't give up! It took me years to find mine. Present owners are reluctant
to give them up. Be happy with the Takumars and mount and use them on your K
equipment.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: smcforme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:14 PM
Bob Rapp wrote:
Don't give up! It took me years to find mine. Present owners are
reluctant
to give them up. Be happy with the Takumars and mount and use them on
your K
equipment.
I stumbled across mine in a pawn shop a couple of years ago. I wasn't even
looking for it but I remembered some
In a message dated 12/06/02 08:05:39 GMT Daylight Time, Bob writes:
Does anybody out there use a Phoenix ringlight flash?
Does it link up to TTL metering in the LX or Super Program.
Or the PZ-1 for that matter...
If this is the same as the Vivitar 6000AF P, then yes it does. I used it with
Steve
We have them, in spades. However they are still £4 ie $6 apiece. I have
shipped plenty to US before and never had a problem.
Kind regards
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
Hello Bernd!
Now that makes perfect sense. I think you`re right that the rear element
floats, because my K-mount specimen had a loose filter ring on it,
Dean (my repairman) took it apart and told me to hold the front
element group while he tightened some screws, and I don`t
remember him fighting
Hi Frank.I have two choices in my area,one is the
Rapid Photo at Markville Mall and the other is Accent
Photo 14th Ave and Woodbine(Aaron being the third):)
I usually take it to Accent over Rapid as the latter
does not do 120 film or E-6,so if i have a roll
of each i can do it at one place
Just wondering if this has happened to anyone on
the list.
Received my latest 2 IR rolls back Tuesday.The second
roll(last shot)was all scratched,and badly,like a cat
sharpened its claws on the negs.This was a roll
i had winding troubles with from frame one.
I really had to pull hard on the wind
I say the same auction Garry but the deceased friend thing
had me concerned.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's sort of what I figured, but at the same time, he says that he's
selling it for a deceased friend.
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
Mike,
Do you mean that there is only one way to see a
subject/scene? Are you saying that the act of
observation doesn't change the subject/scene?
Very curious.
Bob
--- mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Fernando wrote:
Sorry, but I couldn't see where the paradox is..
and Bob S.
Sometimes.If your ISP is off line for repairs etc,
the messages bounce back to our list overseer and you'll get
unsubscribed.Happens to me with this free account about
3-4 times a year.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: smcforme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:45:43 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's OT since it's Rolleiflex TLR, not Pentax, but I think this guy's work
is great.
Enjoy...
http://www.pyke-eye.com/main.html
Albano
Great portraits. I thought the images were very strong.
Made me think though.
My husband just came back from a trip
In a message dated 12/06/02 17:18:08 GMT Daylight Time, Bernd writes:
Hi all,
during a flight to Asia next way, I have a 3 hour stay at Tokyo Airport. Is
there a possibilty to buy Pentax stuff in one of the Airport shops? I am
looking for Limited lenses, especially the black ones which are
Just wondering what the general consciences is on APS film format.
A few years ago, it was introduced with great fan fare as the next
revolution in film. Doesn't seem to have made much of an impact and it is
not that easy to get at times. In its defense, I purchased a Canon ELPH Jr.
a while back
Oliver,
You've got to send along the ebay seller's name.
The link you supplied only works from your ebay account.
Regards, Bob S.
I found some shop that is closing, and is putting MANY spare parts (mostly covers
and bodies) for 35mm Spotties and also 67 Pentax bodies.
-
This message is
The listed weight difference is a bit less than 300 g
(255g). This is without batteries though; the MZ-S uses
those little toy ones and the F100 uses AA. With
batteries the difference is more. Unless, of course, you
don't like little toy batteries, and you get the battery
grip for the MZ-S.
In a message dated 6/11/2002 10:32:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've heard that they don't last very long?
That I'm not sure about.
-Brendan MacRae
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
John,
My guess is that digital is killing APS off much faster than it is
killing off 35mm. I believe that the biggest benefit to the smaller
format is size of body and lens. So you can get a fairly compact
camera that produces reasonable PS pictures. Some of the digital
models are equally
Minolta has stopped producing cameras for APS. Our minilab (totally
outdated Konica) can only 35mm and 110. Customers who wish to have APS
processed, nearly all complain about the $8.99 charge from Qualex. I'd say
give it 5 years at the most before it goes the way of Discfilm.
Bill KG4LOV
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Subject: Re: Re[4]: What is the most quiet body?
I must concur with Brother Bruce on this. Have you looked
that
the Nikon F100 and the Nikkor lens line.
Much better AF than the PZ1p, and much faster operation than
the
MZ-S.
And F100
John,
It will probably end up like disc, 110, and other formats.
I, too, have used APS. I have used the N Pronea APS SLR. It hase
autofocus (of course) and uses interchangeable lenses, albeit only zooms. I
was very impressed with the photos got with the camera but at the same time
As most of you know, I'm somewhat of an Agfa fanatic. In my last order from
BH, I had them send me a roll of the RSX II ISO 50. Has anyone else tried
it, and if so, what's your opinion?
Thanks
Bill
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
I wonder what calculations the photographer used to get the nearly pefect spacing of
each exposure?
Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a great photo of this
week's eclipse on today's Astonomy Picture of
the Day:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
--
Daniel J.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Delano Mireles
With the onset of summer here in Texas I find myself having
a difficult time
controlling the temperature of my developing chemicals and
so I come to
y'all (Like I said - I'm from
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Brooks
Tom.I only wish.It was scracthed from frame 1 to were i stopped
at frame 25 or 26.There were about 10 to 15 horizontal lines
through out from 1 to 25.
So it was evenly scratched from
- Original Message -
From: Delano Mireles
With the onset of summer here in Texas I find myself having a
difficult time
controlling the temperature of my developing chemicals and so
I come to
y'all (Like I said - I'm from Texas) for any tips on keeping
your soup at a
consistent temp.
To me high drive speed and fast AF are really not that important unless
your covering sports or other high speed action.
DG
At 11:32 AM 6/12/02 -0600, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Subject: Re: Re[4]: What is the most quiet body?
I must concur with
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Eclipse Photo
There is a great photo of this week's eclipse on today's Astonomy Picture of
the Day:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
That is a brilliant photo!
Wish I'd got to see it :-(
There are a couple of good ones in
dick,
That is exactly what the original poster said was important. That is
why the whole discussion occurred. The MZ-S was ruled out in favor of
the PZ-1p because of high drive speed. Then I said that Pentax is not
strong in this venue. The PZ-1p has winder speed but single sensor AF
and the
An interval timer that took a picture every n seconds.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: smcforme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Eclipse Photo
I wonder what calculations the photographer used to get the nearly
Brendan wrote:
It will probably end up like disc, 110, and other formats.
Driving around on vacation recently, I noticed sereral touristy sort of
places stocked 35mm film but no APS...but they *did* have some 110 film!
(I got excited when I first saw the boxes because I thought it might be
120
Bill.
I have only tried 1 roll of 100 and 1 roll of 200.As i'm
shooting slide film for the first time in a while,these are
just my opinions.
Using only a light table and no loupe,i see little differences
but am impressed with the colour.It seems accurate to what i
shot.
My second roll of 100
Begin Original Message
Dave scribed
Tom.I only wish.It was scracthed from frame 1 to were i stopped
at frame 25 or 26.There were about 10 to 15 horizontal lines
through out from 1 to 25.
Then Tom
So it was evenly scratched from the start to where it jammed?
I wasn't refer to the consistency of the spacing, but the degree of spacing. As in how
did he/she know how long to make each exposure so that each image of the sun did not
overlap or be too far apart.
Paris, Leonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An interval timer that took a
picture every n
Thanks, Tom. I have the bath but I just have a difficult time dialing it in
at around 68 degrees. Sometimes I overshoot and get it down to 62 and then
have a hard time getting it back up without overshooting. Then again, I'm
probably not being patient enough :-)
Thanks again,
Delano
on
Nearly all modern Pentax filters are SMC, and marked accordingly, although I found an
old non-SMC 49mm Pentax flood filter (looks like an 80A, maybe for floodlights at
sports events?) at a yard sale.
However, I read somewhere that polarizing filters are usually not multi-coated. Does
someone
Bill,
Thanks for the suggestion. I had not thought about using the fridge to cool
the chemistry. Now I just need to get clearance from my wife :-)
Delano
on 6/12/02 12:57 PM, William Robb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Delano Mireles
With the onset of
If the scratches continued past where you had stopped shooting, I would say
it was very possible that the photo lab had scratched your film. Possible
from dirty racks in the film processor. However, since only the section of
the film you ran through the camera is damaged, I would agree that
I'd like to buy a circular polarizing filter, and had
a few questions:
1. BH sells the Pentax Circular Polarizer, but
doesn't specify that it is multi-coated. Does Pentax
sell non-SMC filters?
I don't think the Pentax polarizers are multicoated, at least the Japanese
web site doesn't say so.
Hi, Bill.
In my experience, the RSX II 50 will behave differently when processed
by different labs. From two labs here in Oslo, I have received images
with a noticeable magenta cast which was not at all nice. However, I
have also found a lab that do a decent job on this film.
Last winter I tried
You don't have to go that far. Just stay right here and read about digital.
You'll get all the denial you can handle.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: APS Film
For an
Hi Jenny.
I looked at the neg's and the scratching stops at the last
frame shot.Both rolls were done together so the lab
felt it was a camera problem.
I was going to mention to them about the stiff winding
but thought it should not matter.I will advise them in the
future and hopfully IR roll
Wendy Beard wrote:
The picture of the day in Daniels's link looks like it was taken normally
without any filters - otherwise how else would the golden gate bridge
appear on the photo? [Snip] How do you do it?
Hi Wendy,
The picture on the NASA site is described in the caption as a
bill,
i have shot a few rolls of iso 100 film (120 roll), and liked it very
much. cannot say anything negative about it. in fact, after the first
roll was out, i went back to that store and bought two dozen more, so
now it is what i shoot exclusively.
oh, yes: it was a few months past expiration
There is no paradox. Although it's impractical to fully record any event as
experienced (sight, sound, smell, temperature, cultural connections, emotional
connections, etc.), an acceptable approximation would be a video or film record (with
stereo binaural sound) made with a movie camera
You'll notice that the actual image of the sun is completely blown. So no filter
needed if you don't mind that. As far as eye protection, you could easily compose the
photo by shielding the sun with your hand in front of the lens. It also appears to be
a fairly wide angle lens. So if you did
Hello all,
I am looking for a fully functional MX, with or without winder.
Please contact me off list if you have something for sale.
Thanks, Eric
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
Well,
Since the apparent motion of the sun is constant, all the
photographer had to do was take a picture every X minuites. He took 18
frames (counting the number of suns in the picture), and the eclipse in
San Fransiscio took T time. All he had to do to find X is simple math:
T/18 = X
Hi,
I read up on this stuff before the total eclipse of 1999 in
Pasachoff's book, and although I didn't get any decent photos of my
own I did learn a few things. The book includes examples similar to
this one. The moon and the sun move at reasonably constant speeds relative
to the earth, so we
Whoops!
the ebay ID of the seller is is jpd19 - or to go there copy all lines of
the following URL into your browser: including the 'lude...25 bit :)
http://cgi6.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItemsuserid=jpd19
inc
lude=0since=-1sort=3rows=25
Enjoy!
Oliver
- Original
Wednesday, June 12, 2002, 3:31:15 PM, Antti-Pekka wrote:
APV At 06:17 12.6.2002 -0700, Jeff wrote:
I'd like to buy a circular polarizing filter, and had
a few questions:
1. BH sells the Pentax Circular Polarizer, but
doesn't specify that it is multi-coated. Does Pentax
sell non-SMC filters?
APV
Hey gang...
I currently have the M version of the 100mm f2.8. I really enjoy the results
this lens produces. However, I'm in the market for a macro lens and I want to
know how the f2.8 100mm Macro does for non-macro/portrait work. Is it as
sharp or sharper that the m and a series lenses?
I live in Derry, NH and work in Needham, Ma.
Jim Fellows
- Original Message -
From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:56 PM
Subject: any pdmlers in boston area?
subj. -- just curious
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
Aside from the bulk, the 100 f2.8 macro is a much sharper lens. Macro
requires high correction, low distortion and flatness of field. The end
result is a fantastic general purpose lens.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, I'm in the market for a macro lens and I
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae
Subject: 100mm 2.8 Macro vs. 100mm 2.8
Hey gang...
I currently have the M version of the 100mm f2.8. I really
enjoy the results
this lens produces. However, I'm in the market for a macro
lens and I want to
know how the f2.8 100mm Macro
brendan,
one thing for sure: it's a hell of a lot more
(1) heavier
(2) expensive (i'd gess ~$700)
(3) difficult to find
i don't own it, but i used to have m100/2.8 and i'd guess any decent
macro lens would be sharper.
there are tons of very good used 3rd party macro lenses (i personally
have a
This warning would be a tad late for me now since my film often stays in the
camera a week or three...if it's not good to do this with frozen film, I'm
in a heap o trouble...
Cory
- Original Message -
From: Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Use one ... compare the results to the $135.00 lens. Then tell us what
you think. Oh, make a print larger than 4x6 ...
Mishka wrote:
there are tons of very good used 3rd party macro lenses (i personally
have a pka vivitar ser. 1 100/2.5 -- terrific glass, terrific build,
does 1:1, and $135
harald_nancy wrote:
Last time I used black and white, it was less expensive than color.
Does anyone know a more cost effective lab for bw film processing?
I'm not planning to develop and print my own bw.
Back on May 21, I received an email from Mystic Color Labs that included this
bit:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, smcforme wrote:
I have been casually looking out for a SMC 35/3.5 in K-mount for
months, and have not seen hide nor hair of it. I bought one in
M42, and have seen 3 others for really decent prices. But in
K-mount this thing must be fairly rare. Same story for the SMC
Bob,
The pictures are gorgeous. But that shows how good the photographer is.
At this resolution it tells next to nothing about the lens (except that
it focuses really close :)
But then again, for $300 (as was the target price), I would be
tempted...
Mishka
From: Rfsindg
Subject: Re: 100mm
I actually like the effect of the sratches on Moon and Stars.
Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Did the ghostless filters come in any sizes except for 49mm? all the ones
i've seen are 49mm.
- Original Message -
From: Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Antti-Pekka Virjonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: Are all Pentax Filters SMC?
At 15:41 12-6-2002 -0400, you wrote:
Wednesday, June 12, 2002, 9:46:27 AM, you wrote:
BJ Just wondering what the general consciences is on APS film format.
BJ A few years ago, it was introduced with great fan fare as the next
BJ revolution in film. Doesn't seem to have made much of an impact
Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
The pictures are gorgeous. But that shows how good the photographer is.
At this resolution it tells next to nothing about the lens (except that
it focuses really close :)
But then again, for $300 (as was the target price), I would be
tempted...
I bought my
Cantabridgian myself.
-Jeff
--- John Mullan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 18:07:37 -0400, Jim Fellows
wrote:
I live in Derry, NH and work in Needham, Ma.
Jim Fellows
- Original Message -
From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June
Hi,
Are there any listers who read german that i could send a couple of lines of
german text to, so they could tell what it means?
The online translators are making a mess of it.
Please contact me offlist at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Mishka wrote: According to photodo.com the MTF ratings are
Grade: 4.6 35mm/MF Tokina AT-X 90/2,5 macro
Grade: 3.9 35mm/AF Pentax SMC-FA Makro 100/2,8
Grade: 4.3 35mm/AF Pentax SMC-F 100/2,8 macro
Grade: 4 35mm/MF Vivitar 105/2,5 Macro Series 1
so, yes, pentax has a lens that is a tad better than
Mishka,
I agree about the resolution. You can't tell much over the internet.
Still, I was surprised at how many of my PUG shots were with the macro.
I believe that I chose these photos because the slides were special.
They were exceptionally sharp, and drew my attention.
...And some of us
I bought this lens several years ago and really enjoy it. One of the real
joys of the lens I found was that it had a beautifully finished aluminum
tripod mount custom-made for the lens. It really adds to the value and the
usefulness of the lens..
Vic
In a message dated 6/11/02 11:19:39 PM,
I stumbled across mine at a local camera shop several years ago. I think I
paid 35-40 Cdn. About $20 American. And it's mint...
Good luck in your search...
In a message dated 6/12/02 3:17:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have been casually looking out for a SMC 35/3.5 in K-mount for months,
On my two passes through Narita, I was able to find Pentax gear in the duty
free shops. As Peter says, not much for serious Pentaxers. Also, the prices
are a bit higher than U.S. retail, about 40% over BH on the few items I
looked at closely.
Stan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Jun
Little bit of a cheap shot here. I'm with Mishka. A Vivitar or Tokina is
going to give you just as good results as the Pentax. The feel might be
different but the end result is not. The vivitar Series One, Tokina ATX and
the Kiron 105mm macros were all excellent lenses in their day and they
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard
Subject: Re: APS Film
A year or three back I bought a Canon Ixus (Elph?) in APS
because of the
small size and gorgeous looks.
When the Digital Ixus came out I bought that because I loved
the size and
the design of it.
I have since sold the
- Original Message -
From: Paul Jones
Subject: Re: Are all Pentax Filters SMC?
Did the ghostless filters come in any sizes except for 49mm?
all the ones
i've seen are 49mm.
I recall asking this a while back. I am pretty sure the answer
was only 49mm.
William Robb
-
This message is
I'm with you Paul. I have both the Pentax 100mm F4 macro and the Tokina ATX
90 F2.5. Both are excellent lenses but the Tokina gets more use primarily for
its speed.
Vic
In a message dated 6/12/02 9:18:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, the Tokina AT-X 90/2.5 is the same as the
Bob: I think there are lots of reasons photographers gravitate to one or two
lenses. It's not necessarily that the lens is better than the other lenses in
their arsenal, it's often because they feel comfortable with that lens. A 100
F2.8 is a great lens whether it's a macro or not. I'll bet
I have a Pentax M 150mm F3.5 SMC lens that I would like to sell. It is beautiful
condition. I can confidently say rate it as EX+. Even the inspection sticker looks
good. The coating on this lens is amazing as expected. I'd like $145.00. If you're
interested I can E-mail you a some pics
Uh... I've got to start proof reading my messages. Sorry to anyone who had to wade
through the grammer of my last message!
smcforme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a Pentax M 150mm F3.5 SMC lens that I
would like to sell. It is beautiful condition. I can confidently say rate it as EX+.
Even
Revuenon 55mm 1.2 lens, from description:
This lens was made in Japan, most likely at the glass foundry of
Tomioka that has also produced high-quality lenses for Yashica, Contax
and Chinon. It was sold in Germany by the photo retail chain of Photo
Quelle under their brand name Revuenon.
Yahoo!
can't get mine to do it
-Brendan MacRae
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Original Message -
From: smcforme
Subject: FS:SMC-M 150/3.5
I have a Pentax M 150mm F3.5 SMC lens that I would like to
sell. It is beautiful condition. I can confidently say rate it
as EX+. Even the inspection sticker looks good. The coating on
this lens is amazing as expected. I'd
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: 100mm 2.8 Macro vs. 100mm 2.8
Little bit of a cheap shot here. I'm with Mishka. A Vivitar or
Tokina is
going to give you just as good results as the Pentax. The feel
Mine just did it three times in a row.
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 11:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can't get mine to do it
--
Kenneth Archer, San Antonio, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
Well, I lucked out. My b-day present came today and this one is no
paperweight!
My source rated this one an 8+...it's more like a 9+! Almost perfect...what a
gem.
I'm thrilled. I saw that Richard Tillis was selling one for $549 not long
ago. Mine was only $269 plus shipping.
I love wides.
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae
Subject: Pentax-A 20mm f2.8...ohhh, ahhh
Well, I lucked out. My b-day present came today and this one
is no
paperweight!
Welcome to the Brotherhood of the Glass...
Brother William
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Just got back from shooting a family portrait. Outdoors in somewhat
shady surroundings. I debated between the 90 or 165 leaf shutter so I
could do some fill flash. I ended up using only the 165 for 5 rolls
(50 frames). I can say that after working some with the 90 and now
the 165, that the
Got second place!
http://www.fotoforum.com/assignwinner.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I just got back some rolls shot at my daughter's 8th grade graduation.
All in all, I shot 1 roll of Kodak Portra 800, 2 rolls of Agfa
Portrait 160, 1 roll of Fuji NHG II and one 220 roll of Konica
Portrait 160. I shot this variety due to changing light conditions
and wanting to test the Agfa and
on 07/10/02 13:01, Oliver Raymond shared with me:
Whoops!
the ebay ID of the seller is is jpd19 - or to go there copy all lines of
the following URL into your browser: including the 'lude...25 bit :)
http://cgi6.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItemsuserid=jpd19
inc
94 matches
Mail list logo
