I wish there were an AF-C custom function setting available wherein I could
disallow the shutter's releasing unless focus is achieved. Still, for special
affects, re-focus or.. I'd like to retain a shutter priority option.
Make sense to anyone else?
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Di
...the horse farm we are associated with had asked for
pictures for their web site ~before~ I got rid of the PC,.
I'm now in back up heaven.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML P
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> I wish there were an AF-C custom function setting available wherein I could
> disallow the shutter's releasing unless focus is achieved. Still, for special
> affects, re-focus or.. I'd like to retain a shutter priority o
I knew I could count on you, Dave. Actually calmed my fears. :)
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, David J Brooks wrote:
> From: David J Brooks
> Subject: Re: I Wish
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 7:48 AM
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:21
There isn't one? It's an option on the higher-end Canon and Nikon bodies.
-Adam
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> I wish there were an AF-C custom function setting available wherein I could
> disallow the shutter's releasing unless focus is achieve
Jack Davis wrote:
I wish there were an AF-C custom function setting available wherein I could
disallow the shutter's releasing unless focus is achieved. Still, for
special affects, re-focus or.. I'd like to retain a shutter priority
option.
Make sense to anyone else?
The K-5 has
Jack Davis wrote:
>I wish there were an AF-C custom function setting available wherein I could
>disallow the shutter's releasing unless focus is achieved. Still, for special
>affects, re-focus or.. I'd like to retain a shutter priority option.
>Make sense to anyone else
The K-5 allows you to prioritize focus or shooting speed in continuous
autofocus. Choosing focus priority tends to make focus lock more likely in
continuous shooting, although it's no guarantee that every frame will be in
focus.
Paul
On Dec 10, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
I haven't purchased the K-5..yet(?) I'm using the K10&20
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, Adam Maas wrote:
> From: Adam Maas
> Subject: Re: I Wish
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 8:32 AM
> There isn't one? It
On Dec 10, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Jack Davis wrote:
>
>> I wish there were an AF-C custom function setting available wherein I could
>> disallow the shutter's releasing unless focus is achieved. Still, for
>> special affects, re-focus or..
GOOD! Thanks, Dario.
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, Dario Bonazza wrote:
> From: Dario Bonazza
> Subject: Re: I Wish
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 8:42 AM
> Jack Davis wrote:
>
> > I wish there were an AF-C custom func
It would need sufficient AF speed to allow refocusing tweaks.
So, is Dario wrong about the K-5 having said feature?
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, Mark Roberts wrote:
> From: Mark Roberts
> Subject: Re: I Wish
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, December 10
Thanks, Paul. I get that. Increased possibility of focus is the idea.
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, paul stenquist wrote:
> From: paul stenquist
> Subject: Re: I Wish
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 8:55 AM
> The K-5 allows you
berts wrote:
>
>> From: Mark Roberts
>> Subject: Re: I Wish
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 8:45 AM
>> Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>> >I wish there were an AF-C custom function setting
>> available wherein I
Not in the K20 manual.;) I hope to be reading the K-5 manual in not too long.
Awaiting a couple more reviews and additional feed back from the PDML.
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> From: Steven Desjardins
> Subject: Re: I Wish
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail
Jack Davis wrote:
It would need sufficient AF speed to allow refocusing tweaks.
So, is Dario wrong about the K-5 having said feature?
From K-5 manual, page 123:
AF.C Continuous Mode
1 Focus priority - Takes pictures giving priority to keeping the subject in
focus during Continuous Shooti
wrong about the K-5 having said feature?
>
> Jack
>
> --- On Fri, 12/10/10, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> From: Mark Roberts
>> Subject: Re: I Wish
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 8:45 AM
>> Jack Davi
Thanks again, Dario! I could look these things up I know, but a final question;
does the K-5 also retain the AF.S focus lock feature?
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, Dario Bonazza wrote:
> From: Dario Bonazza
> Subject: Re: I Wish
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Dat
Thanks once again, Paul! Dario, also, confirmed "focus priority."
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, paul stenquist wrote:
> From: paul stenquist
> Subject: Re: I Wish
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 9:24 AM
> No, Dario is
Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks again, Dario! I could look these things up I know, but a final
question; does the K-5 also retain the AF.S focus lock feature?
Of course! Focus priority is the default setting for AF.S, with the
alternative choice of Release priority.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discus
Thank you, Dario. Guess I wasn't the first to want such a feature. ;)
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, Dario Bonazza wrote:
> From: Dario Bonazza
> Subject: Re: I Wish
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 9:40 AM
> Jack Davis wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
> There isn't one? It's an option on the higher-end Canon and Nikon bodies.
>
> -Adam
I'll look in my manuals, but i'm positive I can do that on my Nikons.
Dave
>
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Jack Davis
0, Steven Desjardins wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins
Subject: Re: I Wish
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 9:08 AM
Isn't there a custom setting for
something like that?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf
Sounds like the wife is dutifully reminding you of AAA the other
"important" things that need money before you get a new toy.
Wives tend to be so damned practical. hurmpth!!
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, Bruce Walker wrote:
> From: Bruce Walker
> Subject: Re: I Wish
>
On 2010-12-10 11:42, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
I wish there were an AF-C custom function setting available wherein I
could disallow the shutter's releasing unless focus is achieved.
Still, for special affects, re-focus or.. I'd like to retain a shutter
priority option.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:40:37PM -0500, Doug Franklin wrote:
> On 2010-12-10 11:42, Dario Bonazza wrote:
> >Jack Davis wrote:
> >
> >>I wish there were an AF-C custom function setting available wherein I
> >>could disallow the shutter's releasing unless foc
On 2010-12-10 16:23, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:40:37PM -0500, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2010-12-10 11:42, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
I wish there were an AF-C custom function setting available wherein I
could disallow the shutter's releasing unless foc
w
On 10-12-10 12:11 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Not in the K20 manual.;) I hope to be reading the K-5 manual in not
too long.
Awaiting a couple more reviews and additional feed back from the PDML.
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, Steven Desjardins wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins
Subject: Re: I Wish
bmw
> >
> >
> >On 10-12-10 12:11 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> >>Not in the K20 manual.;) I hope to be reading the K-5 manual in
> >>not too long.
> >>Awaiting a couple more reviews and additional feed back from the PDML.
> >>
> >>Jack
> &
x27;s setting us back.
>>>
>>> -bmw
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10-12-10 12:11 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>>> Not in the K20 manual.;) I hope to be reading the K-5 manual in
>>>> not too long.
>>>> Awaiting a couple mo
> >On 10-12-10 12:11 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> >>Not in the K20 manual.;) I hope to be reading the K-5 manual in
>> >>not too long.
>> >>Awaiting a couple more reviews and additional feed back from the PDML.
>> >>
>> >>Jack
>> &
>>>>
>>>> The only reason there won't be one under my Xmas tree this year is
>>>> that "we" are getting a new floor for the house. I could have
>>>> bought a 645D for what that's setting us back.
>>>>
>>>>
om: Paul Sorenson
> Subject: Re: I Wish
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 2:56 PM
> I feel your pain. Some time
> before the end of the year we're supposed to be getting new
> windows. That's *four* K-5s that could have be
I know you agree that you got a real bargain and certainly the best possible
outcome.
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, paul stenquist wrote:
> From: paul stenquist
> Subject: Re: I Wish
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 3:37 PM
> I cou
> I know you agree that you got a real bargain and certainly the best possible
> outcome.
>
> Jack
>
> --- On Fri, 12/10/10, paul stenquist wrote:
>
>> From: paul stenquist
>> Subject: Re: I Wish
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Date
agree that you got a real bargain and certainly the best
> > possible outcome.
> >
> > Jack
> >
> > --- On Fri, 12/10/10, paul stenquist wrote:
> >
> >> From: paul stenquist
> >> Subject: Re: I Wish
> >> To: "Pentax-Discu
legal action is
>> indefensible. And having to compete with the UK
>> s financial resources makes it less than a bargain.
>> Paul
>> On Dec 10, 2010, at 7:08 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>>> I know you agree that you got a real bargain and certainly the best
>&g
t possible
outcome.
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, paul stenquist wrote:
From: paul stenquist
Subject: Re: I Wish
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 3:37 PM
I could have had six 645Ds for what
it cost me to save Grace from her drunken wife-beating
father and t
Your success in "rescuing" your grand daughter for your daughter as well as
yourself is priceless. I completely get that the cost/funds imbalance was
extremely unfair and difficult to understand.
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, paul stenquist wrote:
> From: paul stenquist
> Sub
On Dec 11, 2010, at 5:58 AM, paul stenquist wrote:
> I don't think continuous autofocus is predictive. It just continues to adjust
> focus as the shutter button is held down at least half way. I think that if
> it were predictive, it would work only for one rate of subject movement.
The Z-1p ha
ouch... what a long list of unhappened 645Ds. I'll add that I am one
behind because my insurance company gave me bad advice and my sick pay
was € 9900 too low over the past 11 months which pretty much makes
/my/ 645D a non-reality... grrr
Ecke
2010/12/11 David Mann :
> On Dec 11, 2010, at 5:58 AM,
aughter as well as
> yourself is priceless. I completely get that the cost/funds imbalance was
> extremely unfair and difficult to understand.
>
> Jack
>
> --- On Fri, 12/10/10, paul stenquist wrote:
>
>> From: paul stenquist
>> Subject: Re: I Wish
>> To:
gt;> long.
>>> Awaiting a couple more reviews and additional feed back from the PDML.
>>>
>>> Jack
>>>
>>> --- On Fri, 12/10/10, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Steven Desjardins
>>>> Subject: Re: I Wish
>>>&g
From: John Francis
It's a philosophical difference, and no more "indefensible"
than the US system of "one law for the rich, one for the poor"
which allows those with deep enough pockets to buy their way
out of just about any situation.
My understanding is the British law in this case is sort o
> > It's a philosophical difference, and no more "indefensible"
> > than the US system of "one law for the rich, one for the poor"
> > which allows those with deep enough pockets to buy their way
> > out of just about any situation.
>
> My understanding is the British law in this case is sort of i
From: "Bob W"
It's a philosophical difference, and no more "indefensible"
> > than the US system of "one law for the rich, one for the poor"
> > which allows those with deep enough pockets to buy their way
> > out of just about any situation.
>
> My understanding is the British law in this case
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 09:39:07AM -0500, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: John Francis
>
> >It's a philosophical difference, and no more "indefensible"
> >than the US system of "one law for the rich, one for the poor"
> >which allows those with deep enough pockets to buy their way
> >out of just about
It's my understanding that, in the British system, unlike in the US,
the loser of the case is responsible for the legal fees and court costs
of the winner. That would tend to make their system more workable, an d
would almost certainly make them more likely to foot the bill for the
highest-pa
John Sessoms wrote:
[...]
Gateway2000 had the money, and were able to buy the court. Their lawyers
shopped around until they found a judge who would grant the injunction.
Bankrupted him. Gateway used their financial muscle to buy "justice"; or
more properly, to deny justice to my acquaintanc
It's my understanding (in some cases I know to be correct) that in USA civil
cases, court costs and attorney's fees are included in the award. How common
this is, is not known to me.
Jack
--- On Sat, 12/11/10, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> From: Walter Gilbert
> Subject: Re: I Wi
fees are included in the award. How common
this is, is not known to me.
Jack
--- On Sat, 12/11/10, Walter Gilbert wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
Subject: Re: I Wish
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Date: Saturday, December 11, 2010, 10:16 AM
It's my understanding that, in the
British
From: Walter Gilbert
It's my understanding that, in the British system, unlike in the US,
the loser of the case is responsible for the legal fees and court costs
of the winner. That would tend to make their system more workable, an d
would almost certainly make them more likely to foot the bi
From: Jack Davis
It's my understanding (in some cases I know to be correct) that in
USA civil cases, court costs and attorney's fees are included in the
award. How common this is, is not known to me.
Jack
I believe that applies to some cases brought in federal courts. May also
apply in some
2011/1/20 David J Brooks :
> I'm now in back up heaven.
Must be better than backup hell, at least?
Hope you retrieve the images smoothly.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdm
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:30 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
> 2011/1/20 David J Brooks :
>> I'm now in back up heaven.
>
> Must be better than backup hell, at least?
> Hope you retrieve the images smoothly.
>
> Jostein
Retrieving smoothly, but my early archives are not as organized as my
recent ones, if you
Here's a fairly extensive preview of the GR Digital:
http://www.letsgodigital.org/html/review/ricoh/gr/
digital_camera_EN1.html
Godfrey
All,
I haven't looked at Pentax patents for awhile, so I did a search at the U.S.
Patent Office website. I found these extremely cool Pentax Patents:
6311022 "Film-Back Exchangeable Camera"
Maybe a new version of their 645, but with exchangeable backs? Cool
6318912 "Adapter Hav
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Here's a fairly extensive preview of the GR Digital:
http://www.letsgodigital.org/html/review/ricoh/gr/digital_camera_EN1.html
I thought you had no brand affection :-)
On the advice of fellow-PDMLer John Whittingham I bought an old Ricoh
5300 and
Based on the Pixel density, I think it will have a hard time living up
to the quality images produce by the GR2. It'll probably be very noisy
at high ISO.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Here's a fairly extensive preview of the GR Digital:
http://www.letsgodigital.org/html/review/ricoh/gr/
digital_
digital_camera_EN1.html>
Here's a camera I wish Pentax made:
<http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/epson-rd1.shtml>
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Here's a camera I wish Pentax made:
>
><http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/epson-rd1.shtml>
Oddly enough, film rangefinders cameras have never excited me, yet I
find the prospect of a decent digital rangefinder most interes
ricoh/gr/digital_camera_EN1.html>
Here's a camera I wish Pentax made:
<http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/epson-rd1.shtml>
At US$3000 ?
No thanks...
Love the camera, hate the bucks...
keith
Cheers,
Cotty
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's a camera I wish Pentax made:
<http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/epson-rd1.shtml>
Oddly enough, film rangefinders cameras have never excited me, yet I
find the prospect of a decent digital
;==> "Expert Proof"
---
Cotty wrote:
Here's a camera I wish Pentax made:
<http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/epson-rd1.shtml>
On Sep 24, 2005, at 11:56 AM, Cotty wrote:
<http://www.letsgodigital.org/html/review/ricoh/gr/
digital_camera_EN1.html>
Thanks for fixing the link.
Here's a camera I wish Pentax made:
<http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/epson-rd1.shtml>
I played with one of t
On Sep 24, 2005, at 9:47 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Here's a fairly extensive preview of the GR Digital:
http://www.letsgodigital.org/html/review/ricoh/gr/
digital_camera_EN1.html
I thought you had no brand affection :-)
Just because I don't have any brand loyalty doesn't mean that I
- Based on the test images I've seen, it will have no trouble living
up to the image quality of the GR1.
- Based on the sensor size, I expect it will produce noisy results at
ISO 200 and above, yes. With an f/2.6 lens and the small sensor, I'd
just lock it to ISO 100 and leave it there (jus
I've got a set of greycards (white, grey, & black) that are a bit larger than a
business card. I frequently use them to get a white balance reference, since
I'm more likely to shoot in weird lighting than in "standard" light, such as
sunlight, or flash. I recently realized that it would be rea
Hello Larry, just take a fine point permanent marker, a millimeter
scale and mark your own scale on the card. To make it look pro, first
mark 3-horizontal guide lines with a pencil. Use the outer lines for
the centimeter mark and the top + center lines for the millimeter
mark.
And presto you have w
We talked about lenses but there is something needed in bodires.
I was remimded of this recently when my son got his hands
on a Fiji GA645. I had forgotten how nice that vertical frame
was for shooting people.
What Pentax could do is (a) rotate the frame to a vertical
orientation or (b) create a s
The cal fire plane flew directly over me about a second before it
dropped the retardant on the fire about 200m away. My K20D took what
seemed like forever to lock focus.
It's probably a good thing for my productivity that I don't have
anything that'll convert K20 raw files at the office.
I did ap
White balance lens cap...
http://www.adorama.com/searchsite/default.aspx?searchinfo=vivicap
and of course, there's ExpoDisc...but that's not cheap.
-p
On 1/8/2013 12:29 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I've got a set of greycards (white, grey, & black) that are a bit larger than a business
card. I fr
On Jan 7, 2013, at 11:02 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
> White balance lens cap...
>
> http://www.adorama.com/searchsite/default.aspx?searchinfo=vivicap
I've got something like that, but I find reflective white balance cards work a
lot better for me.
>
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i
How about
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/716958-REG/WhiBal_WB7_KC_G7_Key_Chain_White.html
On 8/01/2013 5:29 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I've got a set of greycards (white, grey, & black) that are a bit larger than a business
card. I frequently use them to get a white balance reference, s
On Jan 8, 2013, at 2:59 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
>
> How about
>
> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/716958-REG/WhiBal_WB7_KC_G7_Key_Chain_White.html
That looks good, though I'd probably want the slightly larger one:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/768395-REG/WhiBal_WB7_PC_G7_White_Bal
From: Larry Colen
I've got a set of greycards (white, grey, & black) that are a bit
larger than a business card. I frequently use them to get a white
balance reference, since I'm more likely to shoot in weird lighting
than in "standard" light, such as sunlight, or flash. I recently
realized th
pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Photo gadgets that I wish they made
I've got a set of greycards (white, grey, & black) that are a bit larger
than a business card. I frequently use them to get a white balance
reference
age=product_info&cPath=53&products_id=391
Excellent! Thanks!
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message - From: "Larry Colen"
> Subject: Photo gadgets that I wish they made
>
>
>> I've go
On Jan 8, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
> Hello Larry, just take a fine point permanent marker, a millimeter
> scale and mark your own scale on the card. To make it look pro, first
> mark 3-horizontal guide lines with a pencil. Use the outer lines for
> the centimeter mark and the top + ce
On Sep 11, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> We talked about lenses but there is something needed in bodires.
> I was remimded of this recently when my son got his hands
> on a Fiji GA645. I had forgotten how nice that vertical frame
> was for shooting people.
You can rotate the cam
I think the discussion of bodies is a good direction.
If Pentax could take everything they have learned and executed up
until now (in the K-5) and add a few features:
USB 3.0 connectivity
A second card slot
A built-in intervalometer
An articulating live view screen
The most radical idea (that NO
Sony had the "night mode" on several fixed lens video and still
cameras in the early 2000s which flipped the IR-block filter out of
the way of the sensor. Then the product liability suits rolled in when
users discovered that nylon fabrics are essentially transparent to IR
illumination and thousands
Hm. The K-5 already has the intervalometer. See pg 152 in the manual)
http://www.pentaximaging.com/support/manuals-and-literature/
The second card slot would be nice, the articulating screen even better.
Not so sure about USB 3 - card readers are cheap.
-p
On 9/12/2011 1:15 PM, Darren Add
As long as we are WISHING, wouldn't it be cool if Pentax would take
the knowledge they achieve from building the 645D and offer a 645
digital back for the 67?
Obviously, 67 equipment prices would rise but I think there would be a
not-insignificant number of people who would pay $3k-4k to make a 6
Larry Colen wrote:
The cal fire plane flew directly over me about a second before it
dropped the retardant on the fire about 200m away. My K20D took what
seemed like forever to lock focus.
It's probably a good thing for my productivity that I don't have
anything that'll convert K20 raw files at
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:08:42PM -0700, Keith Whaley wrote:
> Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> Where is your office?
South San Jose,
855 embedded way, San Jose CA, 95138
>
> Where was the fire?
Along coyote creek trail between blossom hill/silver creek to about
the park (Hellyer park?)
http://ti
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 03:58:46PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
> The cal fire plane flew directly over me about a second before it
> dropped the retardant on the fire about 200m away. My K20D took what
> seemed like forever to lock focus.
I never even heard the plane, and Larry's office is only a co
> That's right, an FA 85mm F2 lens in black, Without LTD written on
> the barrel. That way it would cost around $350 US like the N
> or C 85mm F1.8 lenses do. I bet it would be a hot seller.
Yes, "it would be a hot seller" indeed. I know the thread is about
I'd so get one of these
--- Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's right, an FA 85mm F2 lens in black, Without
> LTD written on
> > the barrel. That way it would cost around $350 US
> like the N
> > or C 85mm F1.8 lenses do. I bet it would be a
> hot seller.
>
___
> I'd love to get a Kmt version. And I'd love to get this new(?)
> 85/1.4 if indeed it is kmt They are M42, manual diaphram,
> right?
No, Christopher, the Zenitar 85/1.4 is a true K-mount lens. It not
only has a permanent K-mount flange (and not just an M42-to-K-mount
adapter), it also has t
So I've been using Firefox for years as my email client, and suddenly an
annoyance from the past returned.
The attachment reminder. Use a word that includes the string "attach"
and Firefox used to annoyingly ask if you forgot to attach something.
Back then it wasn't that easy to turn off, bu
It's really too bad that there isn't some part of the Internet made
out of metal and wood, like vintage cameras. Stuff that is well built
and made to last, that you learn how to use and then they become
automatic in your hands.
The older I get, the more I agree with your complaint, PJ.
btw, I as
Peter, this attachment things exists like forever... It saved my arse few
times. Though if course I manage to forget to attach the attachment anyway.
Speaking of UX in general, it's mostly improving with some occasional
hiccups...
Just my cents...
On 26 Feb 2017 16:45, "P. J. Alling" wrote:
>
Yes that's right Thunderbird. It's been divorced from Firefox for
years, but you still remember they were once family.
On 2/26/2017 10:18 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
It's really too bad that there isn't some part of the Internet made
out of metal and wood, like vintage cameras. Stuff that is well
Yes, but it's annoying when something you've used literally for years
starts working differently.
I was just forced by circumstance to get a smart phone. I've only had
it for about a month and already an update removed an "unimportant"
feature that I'd found to be amazingly convenient in one
Yes.
how did you turn it off ? I have Thuderbird too
ann
On 2/26/2017 9:44 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
So I've been using Firefox for years as my email client, and suddenly
an annoyance from the past returned.
The attachment reminder. Use a word that includes the string "attach"
and Firefox use
AnnSan :-), I've just replied to you off-list, as I had to include the
screen-shot that shows what has to be done in order to turn this
feature off.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:23 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
> Yes.
> how did you turn it off ? I have Thuderbird too
>
> ann
>
>
> On 2/26/2017 9:44 AM, P
Peter, I find it worth my while to spend the time and get to know the
marvels of modern engineering that I live with - be it a cell phone or
any other thing for that matter. Having said that, I do admit that if
I have to switch from one appliance to another, say the same cell
phone - I always feel
so I saw.. and replied.. of course it asked me if I forgot when I did
that reply!
and as I said privately, I probably should leave it on since I'm
actually quite likely to forgot to attach and attachment
ann
On 2/26/2017 1:28 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
AnnSan :-), I've just replied to you off-
Boris probably sent you the same information. But just in case, on the
Menu, go to Tools->Options which opens a dialog box. Choose the
Composition tab, un-check "Check for missing attachments. Click OK.
The first time i did that I had to edit an ".ini" file, but of course
Thunderbird called
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
